Firewall (physics)

Last updated

A black hole firewall is a hypothetical phenomenon where an observer falling into a black hole encounters high-energy quanta at (or near) the event horizon. The "firewall" phenomenon was proposed in 2012 by physicists Ahmed Almheiri, Donald Marolf, Joseph Polchinski, and James Sully [1] as a possible solution to an apparent inconsistency in black hole complementarity. The proposal is sometimes referred to as the AMPS firewall, [2] an acronym for the names of the authors of the 2012 paper. The potential inconsistency pointed out by AMPS had been pointed out earlier by Samir Mathur who used the argument in favour of the fuzzball proposal. [3] [4] The use of a firewall to resolve this inconsistency remains controversial, with physicists divided as to the solution to the paradox. [5]

Contents

The motivating paradox

According to quantum field theory in curved spacetime, a single emission of Hawking radiation involves two mutually entangled particles. The outgoing particle escapes and is emitted as a quanta of Hawking radiation; the infalling particle is swallowed by the black hole. Assume that a black hole formed a finite time in the past and will fully evaporate away in some finite time in the future. Then, it will only emit a finite amount of information encoded within its Hawking radiation. For an old black hole that has crossed the half-way point of evaporation, general arguments from quantum-information theory by Page [6] [7] and Lubkin [8] suggest that the new Hawking radiation must be entangled with the old Hawking radiation. However, since the new Hawking radiation must also be entangled with degrees of freedom behind the horizon, this creates a paradox: a principle called "monogamy of entanglement" requires that, like any quantum system, the outgoing particle cannot be fully entangled with two independent systems at the same time; yet here the outgoing particle appears to be entangled with both the infalling particle and, independently, with past Hawking radiation. [5]

AMPS initially argued that to resolve the paradox physicists may eventually be forced to give up one of three time-tested principles: Einstein's equivalence principle, unitarity, or existing quantum field theory. [9] However, it is now accepted that an additional tacit assumption in the monogamy paradox was that of locality. A common view is that theories of quantum gravity do not obey exact locality, which leads to a resolution of the paradox. [10] [3] On the other hand, some physicists argue that such violations of locality cannot resolve the paradox. [11]

The "firewall" resolution to the paradox

Some scientists suggest that the entanglement must somehow get immediately broken between the infalling particle and the outgoing particle. Breaking this entanglement would release large amounts of energy, thus creating a searing "black hole firewall" at the black hole event horizon. This resolution requires a violation of Einstein's equivalence principle, which states that free-falling is indistinguishable from floating in empty space. This violation has been characterized as "outrageous"; theoretical physicist Raphael Bousso has complained that "a firewall simply can't appear in empty space, any more than a brick wall can suddenly appear in an empty field and smack you in the face." [5]

Non-firewall resolutions to the paradox

Some scientists suggest that there is in fact no entanglement between the emitted particle and previous Hawking radiation. This resolution would require black hole information loss, a controversial violation of unitarity. [5]

Others, such as Steve Giddings, suggest modifying quantum field theory so that entanglement would be gradually lost as the outgoing and infalling particles separate, resulting in a more gradual release of energy inside the black hole, and consequently no firewall. [5]

The Papadodimas–Raju proposal [12] [13] [14] [15] posited that the interior of the black hole was described by the same degrees of freedom as the Hawking radiation. This resolves the monogamy paradox by identifying the two systems that the late Hawking radiation is entangled with. Since, in this proposal, these systems are the same, there is no contradiction with the monogamy of entanglement. Along similar lines, Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind suggested in the ER=EPR proposal [16] that the outgoing and infalling particles are somehow connected by wormholes, and therefore are not independent systems. [17] [18]

The fuzzball picture resolves the dilemma by replacing the 'no-hair' vacuum with a stringy quantum state, thus explicitly coupling any outgoing Hawking radiation with the formation history of the black hole. [19] [20]

Stephen Hawking received widespread mainstream media coverage in January 2014 with an informal proposal [21] to replace the event horizon of a black hole with an "apparent horizon" where infalling matter is suspended and then released; however, some scientists have expressed confusion about what precisely is being proposed and how the proposal would solve the paradox. [22]

Characteristics and detection

The firewall would exist at the black hole's event horizon, and would be invisible to observers outside the event horizon. Matter passing through the event horizon into the black hole would immediately be "burned to a crisp" by an arbitrarily hot "seething maelstrom of particles" at the firewall. [5]

In a merger of two black holes, the characteristics of a firewall (if any) may leave a mark on the outgoing gravitational radiation as "echoes" when waves bounce in the vicinity of the fuzzy event horizon. The expected quantity of such echoes is theoretically unclear, as physicists don't currently have a good physical model of firewalls. In 2016, cosmologist Niayesh Afshordi and others argued there were tentative signs of some such echo in the data from the first black hole merger detected by LIGO; [23] more recent work has argued there is no statistically significant evidence for such echoes in the data. [24]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Black hole</span> Astronomical object that has a no-return boundary

A black hole is a region of spacetime where gravity is so strong that nothing, including light or other electromagnetic waves, has enough energy to escape its event horizon. The theory of general relativity predicts that a sufficiently compact mass can deform spacetime to form a black hole. The boundary of no escape is called the event horizon. Although it has a great effect on the fate and circumstances of an object crossing it, it has no locally detectable features according to general relativity. In many ways, a black hole acts like an ideal black body, as it reflects no light. Moreover, quantum field theory in curved spacetime predicts that event horizons emit Hawking radiation, with the same spectrum as a black body of a temperature inversely proportional to its mass. This temperature is of the order of billionths of a kelvin for stellar black holes, making it essentially impossible to observe directly.

The holographic principle is an axiom in string theories and a supposed property of quantum gravity that states that the description of a volume of space can be thought of as encoded on a lower-dimensional boundary to the region — such as a light-like boundary like a gravitational horizon. First proposed by Gerard 't Hooft, it was given a precise string-theory interpretation by Leonard Susskind, who combined his ideas with previous ones of 't Hooft and Charles Thorn. Leonard Susskind said, “The three-dimensional world of ordinary experience––the universe filled with galaxies, stars, planets, houses, boulders, and people––is a hologram, an image of reality coded on a distant two-dimensional surface." As pointed out by Raphael Bousso, Thorn observed in 1978 that string theory admits a lower-dimensional description in which gravity emerges from it in what would now be called a holographic way. The prime example of holography is the AdS/CFT correspondence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum entanglement</span> Correlation between measurements of quantum subsystems, even when spatially separated

Quantum entanglement is the phenomenon that occurs when a group of particles are generated, interact, or share spatial proximity in a way such that the quantum state of each particle of the group cannot be described independently of the state of the others, including when the particles are separated by a large distance. The topic of quantum entanglement is at the heart of the disparity between classical and quantum physics: entanglement is a primary feature of quantum mechanics not present in classical mechanics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hawking radiation</span> Thermal radiation emitted outside the event horizon of a black hole

Hawking radiation is theoretical black body radiation that is theorized to be released outside a black hole's event horizon because of relativistic quantum effects. It is named after the physicist Stephen Hawking, who developed a theoretical argument for its existence in 1974. Hawking radiation is a purely kinematic effect that is generic to Lorentzian geometries containing event horizons or local apparent horizons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">No-hair theorem</span> Black holes are characterized only by mass, charge, and spin

The no-hair theorem states that all stationary black hole solutions of the Einstein–Maxwell equations of gravitation and electromagnetism in general relativity can be completely characterized by only three independent externally observable classical parameters: mass, electric charge, and angular momentum. Other characteristics are uniquely determined by these three parameters, and all other information about the matter that formed a black hole or is falling into it "disappears" behind the black-hole event horizon and is therefore permanently inaccessible to external observers after the black hole "settles down". Physicist John Archibald Wheeler expressed this idea with the phrase "black holes have no hair", which was the origin of the name.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Black hole thermodynamics</span> Area of study

In physics, black hole thermodynamics is the area of study that seeks to reconcile the laws of thermodynamics with the existence of black hole event horizons. As the study of the statistical mechanics of black-body radiation led to the development of the theory of quantum mechanics, the effort to understand the statistical mechanics of black holes has had a deep impact upon the understanding of quantum gravity, leading to the formulation of the holographic principle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Juan Maldacena</span> Argentine physicist (born 1968)

Juan Martín Maldacena is an Argentine theoretical physicist and the Carl P. Feinberg Professor in the School of Natural Sciences at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton. He has made significant contributions to the foundations of string theory and quantum gravity. His most famous discovery is the AdS/CFT correspondence, a realization of the holographic principle in string theory.

In theoretical physics, an extremal black hole is a black hole with the minimum possible mass that is compatible with its charge and angular momentum.

Micro black holes, also called mini black holes or quantum mechanical black holes, are hypothetical tiny black holes, for which quantum mechanical effects play an important role. The concept that black holes may exist that are smaller than stellar mass was introduced in 1971 by Stephen Hawking.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Black hole information paradox</span> Mystery of disappearance of information in a black hole

The black hole information paradox is a puzzle that appears when the predictions of quantum mechanics and general relativity are combined. The theory of general relativity predicts the existence of black holes that are regions of spacetime from which nothing — not even light — can escape. In the 1970s, Stephen Hawking applied the rules of quantum mechanics to such systems and found that an isolated black hole would emit a form of radiation called Hawking radiation. Hawking also argued that the detailed form of the radiation would be independent of the initial state of the black hole and would depend only on its mass, electric charge and angular momentum. The information paradox appears when one considers a process in which a black hole is formed through a physical process and then evaporates away entirely through Hawking radiation. Hawking's calculation suggests that the final state of radiation would retain information only about the total mass, electric charge and angular momentum of the initial state. Since many different states can have the same mass, charge and angular momentum this suggests that many initial physical states could evolve into the same final state. Therefore, information about the details of the initial state would be permanently lost. However, this violates a core precept of both classical and quantum physics—that, in principle, the state of a system at one point in time should determine its value at any other time. Specifically, in quantum mechanics the state of the system is encoded by its wave function. The evolution of the wave function is determined by a unitary operator, and unitarity implies that the wave function at any instant of time can be used to determine the wave function either in the past or the future.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum field theory in curved spacetime</span> Extension of quantum field theory to curved spacetime

In theoretical physics, quantum field theory in curved spacetime (QFTCS) is an extension of quantum field theory from Minkowski spacetime to a general curved spacetime. This theory treats spacetime as a fixed, classical background, while giving a quantum-mechanical description of the matter and energy propagating through that spacetime. A general prediction of this theory is that particles can be created by time-dependent gravitational fields (multigraviton pair production), or by time-independent gravitational fields that contain horizons. The most famous example of the latter is the phenomenon of Hawking radiation emitted by black holes.

In black hole physics and inflationary cosmology, the trans-Planckian problem is the problem of the appearance of quantities beyond the Planck scale, which raise doubts on the physical validity of some results in these two areas, since one expects the physical laws to suffer radical modifications beyond the Planck scale.

A sonic black hole, sometimes called a dumb hole or acoustic black hole, is a phenomenon in which phonons are unable to escape from a region of a fluid that is flowing more quickly than the local speed of sound. They are called sonic, or acoustic, black holes because these trapped phonons are analogous to light in astrophysical (gravitational) black holes. Physicists are interested in them because they have many properties similar to astrophysical black holes and, in particular, emit a phononic version of Hawking radiation. This Hawking radiation can be spontaneously created by quantum vacuum fluctuations, in close analogy with Hawking radiation from a real black hole. On the other hand, the Hawking radiation can be stimulated in a classical process. The boundary of a sonic black hole, at which the flow speed changes from being greater than the speed of sound to less than the speed of sound, is called the event horizon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Event horizon</span> Region in spacetime from which nothing can escape

In astrophysics, an event horizon is a boundary beyond which events cannot affect an observer. Wolfgang Rindler coined the term in the 1950s.

Black hole complementarity is a conjectured solution to the black hole information paradox, proposed by Leonard Susskind, Larus Thorlacius, and Gerard 't Hooft.

Raphael Bousso is a theoretical physicist and cosmologist. He is a professor at the Berkeley Center for Theoretical Physics in the Department of Physics, UC Berkeley. He is known for the Bousso bound on the information content of the universe. With Joseph Polchinski, Bousso proposed the string theory landscape as a solution to the cosmological constant problem.

ER = EPR is a conjecture in physics stating that two entangled particles are connected by a wormhole and is thought by some to be a basis for unifying general relativity and quantum mechanics into a theory of everything.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Samir D. Mathur</span> Indian physicist

Samir Dayal Mathur is a theoretical physicist who specializes in string theory and black hole physics. Mathur is a professor in the Department of Physics at Ohio State University and a member of the University's High Energy Theory Group. He was a faculty member at Massachusetts Institute of Technology from 1991–99 and held postdoctoral positions at Harvard University and the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research.

In quantum information, the Hayden–Preskill thought experiment is a thought experiment that investigates the black hole information paradox by hypothesizing on how long it takes to decode information thrown in a black hole from its Hawking radiation.

Douglas Stanford is an American theoretical physicist. He is an associate professor of physics at Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics of Stanford University. His research interests include quantum gravity, quantum field theory and string theory. Stanford was awarded the 2018 New Horizons in Physics Prize by Fundamental Physics Prize Foundation for his work on improving the understanding of quantum mechanics of black holes via chaos theory.

References

  1. ↑ Almheiri, Ahmed; Marolf, Donald; Polchinski, Joseph; Sully, James (11 February 2013). "Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2013 (2): 62. arXiv: 1207.3123 . Bibcode:2013JHEP...02..062A. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)062. S2CID   55581818.
  2. ↑ Chowdhury, Borun D.; Puhm, Andrea (2013). "Decoherence and the fate of an infalling wave packet: Is Alice burning or fuzzing?". Physical Review D. 88 (6): 063509. arXiv: 1208.2026 . Bibcode:2013PhRvD..88f3509C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.063509. S2CID   3104184.
  3. 1 2 Raju, Suvrat (January 2022). "Lessons from the information paradox". Physics Reports. 943: 1–80. arXiv: 2012.05770 . Bibcode:2022PhR...943....1R. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.10.001. S2CID   228083488.
  4. ↑ Polchinski, Joseph (31 August 2017). "Memories of a Theoretical Physicist". arXiv: 1708.09093 [physics.hist-ph].
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Merali, Zeeya (2013). "Astrophysics: Fire in the hole!". Nature. 496 (7443): 20–23. Bibcode:2013Natur.496...20M. doi: 10.1038/496020a . PMID   23552926. S2CID   4388169.
  6. ↑ Page, Don N. (1993). "Information in black hole radiation". Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (23): 3743–3746. arXiv: hep-th/9306083 . Bibcode:1993PhRvL..71.3743P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3743. PMID   10055062. S2CID   9363821.
  7. ↑ Page, Don N. (1993). "Average entropy of a subsystem". Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (9): 1291–1294. arXiv: gr-qc/9305007 . Bibcode:1993PhRvL..71.1291P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1291. PMID   10055503. S2CID   17058654.
  8. ↑ Lubkin, Elihu (1 May 1978). "Entropy of an n‐system from its correlation with a k‐reservoir". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 19 (5): 1028–1031. Bibcode:1978JMP....19.1028L. doi:10.1063/1.523763.
  9. ↑ Ouellette, Jennifer (21 December 2012). "Black Hole Firewalls Confound Theoretical Physicists". Scientific American. Retrieved 29 October 2013. Originally published Archived 2014-06-03 at the Wayback Machine in Quanta, December 21, 2012.
  10. ↑ Almheiri, Ahmed; Hartman, Thomas; Maldacena, Juan; Shaghoulian, Edgar; Tajdini, Amirhossein (21 July 2021). "The entropy of Hawking radiation". Reviews of Modern Physics. 93 (3): 035002. arXiv: 2006.06872 . Bibcode:2021RvMP...93c5002A. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.93.035002. S2CID   219635921.
  11. ↑ Guo, Bin; Hughes, Marcel R. R.; Mathur, Samir D.; Mehta, Madhur (15 November 2021). "Contrasting the fuzzball and wormhole paradigms for black holes". arXiv: 2111.05295 [hep-th].
  12. ↑ Papadodimas, Kyriakos; Raju, Suvrat (October 2013). "An infalling observer in AdS/CFT". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2013 (10): 212. arXiv: 1211.6767 . Bibcode:2013JHEP...10..212P. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2013)212. S2CID   53650802.
  13. ↑ Papadodimas, Kyriakos; Raju, Suvrat (29 April 2014). "State-dependent bulk-boundary maps and black hole complementarity". Physical Review D. 89 (8): 086010. arXiv: 1310.6335 . Bibcode:2014PhRvD..89h6010P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.086010. S2CID   119118804.
  14. ↑ Carroll, Sean (5 June 2013). "Firewalls, Burning Brightly". Preposterous Universe.
  15. ↑ Karch, Andreas (21 October 2013). "What's Inside a Black Hole's Horizon?". Physics. American Physical Society. 6: 115. Bibcode:2013PhyOJ...6..115K. doi: 10.1103/Physics.6.115 . Retrieved 10 January 2022.
  16. ↑ Maldacena, J.; Susskind, L. (2 September 2013). "Cool horizons for entangled black holes". Fortschritte der Physik. 61 (9): 781–811. arXiv: 1306.0533 . Bibcode:2013ForPh..61..781M. doi:10.1002/prop.201300020. S2CID   119115470.
  17. ↑ Overbye, Dennis (12 August 2013). "A Black Hole Mystery Wrapped in a Firewall Paradox". New York Times. Retrieved 29 October 2013.
  18. ↑ "The Firewall Paradox". New York Times. 12 August 2013. Retrieved 29 October 2013.
  19. ↑ Mathur, Samir D. (2009). "The information paradox: A pedagogical introduction". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 26 (22): 224001. arXiv: 0909.1038 . Bibcode:2009CQGra..26v4001M. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/22/224001. S2CID   18878424.
  20. ↑ Avery, Steven G.; Chowdhury, Borun D.; Puhm, Andrea (2013). "Unitarity and fuzzball complementarity: "Alice fuzzes but may not even know it!"". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2013 (9): 12. arXiv: 1210.6996 . Bibcode:2013JHEP...09..012A. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2013)012. S2CID   118522176.
  21. ↑ Hawking, Stephen (22 Jan 2014). "Information Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holes". arXiv: 1401.5761 [hep-th].
  22. ↑ "Why some physicists aren't buying Hawking's new black hole theory". Christian Science Monitor . 29 January 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  23. ↑ Mera;o, Zeeya (2016). "LIGO black hole echoes hint at general-relativity breakdown". Nature. 540. doi: 10.1038/nature.2016.21135 . S2CID   125931362.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  24. ↑ Westerweck, Julian; Nielsen, Alex B.; Fischer-Birnholtz, Ofek; Cabero, Miriam; Capano, Collin; Dent, Thomas; Krishnan, Badri; Meadors, Grant; Nitz, Alexander H. (15 June 2018). "Low significance of evidence for black hole echoes in gravitational wave data". Physical Review D. 97 (12): 124037. arXiv: 1712.09966 . Bibcode:2018PhRvD..97l4037W. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.124037 .
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.