Twistor theory

Last updated

In theoretical physics, twistor theory was proposed by Roger Penrose in 1967 [1] as a possible path [2] to quantum gravity and has evolved into a widely studied branch of theoretical and mathematical physics. Penrose's idea was that twistor space should be the basic arena for physics from which space-time itself should emerge. It has led to powerful mathematical tools that have applications to differential and integral geometry, nonlinear differential equations and representation theory, and in physics to general relativity, quantum field theory, and the theory of scattering amplitudes. Twistor theory arose in the context of the rapidly expanding mathematical developments in Einstein's theory of general relativity in the late 1950s and in the 1960s and carries a number of influences from that period. In particular, Roger Penrose has credited Ivor Robinson as an important early influence in the development of twistor theory, through his construction of so-called Robinson congruences. [3]

Contents

Overview

Projective twistor space is projective 3-space , the simplest 3-dimensional compact algebraic variety. It has a physical interpretation as the space of massless particles with spin. It is the projectivisation of a 4-dimensional complex vector space, non-projective twistor space , with a Hermitian form of signature (2,2) and a holomorphic volume form. This can be most naturally understood as the space of chiral (Weyl) spinors for the conformal group of Minkowski space; it is the fundamental representation of the spin group of the conformal group. This definition can be extended to arbitrary dimensions except that beyond dimension four, one defines projective twistor space to be the space of projective pure spinors [4] [5] for the conformal group. [6] [7]


In its original form, twistor theory encodes physical fields on Minkowski space in terms of complex analytic objects on twistor space via the Penrose transform. This is especially natural for massless fields of arbitrary spin. In the first instance these are obtained via contour integral formulae in terms of free holomorphic functions on regions in twistor space. The holomorphic twistor functions that give rise to solutions to the massless field equations can be more deeply understood as Čech representatives of analytic cohomology classes on regions in . These correspondences have been extended to certain nonlinear fields, including self-dual gravity in Penrose's nonlinear graviton construction [8] and self-dual Yang–Mills fields in the so-called Ward construction; [9] the former gives rise to deformations of the underlying complex structure of regions in , and the latter to certain holomorphic vector bundles over regions in . These constructions have had wide applications, including inter alia the theory of integrable systems. [10] [11] [12]

The self-duality condition is a major limitation for incorporating the full nonlinearities of physical theories, although it does suffice for Yang–Mills–Higgs monopoles and instantons (see ADHM construction). [13] An early attempt to overcome this restriction was the introduction of ambitwistors by Isenberg, Yasskin & Green, [14] and their superspace extension, super-ambitwistors, by Edward Witten. [15] Ambitwistor space is the space of complexified light rays or massless particles and can be regarded as a complexification or cotangent bundle of the original twistor description. By extending the ambitwistor correspondence to suitably defined formal neighborhoods, Isenberg, Yasskin and Green [14] showed the equivalence between the vanishing of the curvature along such extended null lines and the full Yang-Mills field equations. [14] Witten [15] showed that a further extension, within the framework of super Yang-Mills theory, including fermionic and scalar fields, gave rise, in the case of N=1 or 2 supersymmetry, to the constraint equations, while for N=3 (or 4), the vanishing condition for supercurvature along super null lines (super ambitwistors) implied the full set of field equations, including those for the fermionic fields. This was subsequently shown to give a 1-1 equivalence between the null curvature constraint equations and the supersymmetric Yang-Mills field equations. [16] [17] Through dimensional reduction, it may also be deduced from the analogous super-ambitwistor correspondence for 10-dimensional, N=1 super Yang Mills theory. [18] [19]

Twistorial formulae for interactions beyond the self-dual sector also arose in Witten's twistor string theory, [20] which is a quantum theory of holomorphic maps of a Riemann surface into twistor space. This gave rise to the remarkably compact RSV (Roiban, Spradlin & Volovich) formulae for tree-level S-matrices of Yang–Mills theories, [21] but its gravity degrees of freedom gave rise to a version of conformal supergravity limiting its applicability; conformal gravity is an unphysical theory containing ghosts, but its interactions are combined with those of Yang–Mills theory in loop amplitudes calculated via twistor string theory. [22]

Despite its shortcomings, twistor string theory led to rapid developments in the study of scattering amplitudes. One was the so-called MHV formalism [23] loosely based on disconnected strings, but was given a more basic foundation in terms of a twistor action for full Yang–Mills theory in twistor space. [24] Another key development was the introduction of BCFW recursion. [25] This has a natural formulation in twistor space [26] [27] that in turn led to remarkable formulations of scattering amplitudes in terms of Grassmann integral formulae [28] [29] and polytopes. [30] These ideas have evolved more recently into the positive Grassmannian [31] and amplituhedron.

Twistor string theory was extended first by generalising the RSV Yang–Mills amplitude formula, and then by finding the underlying string theory. The extension to gravity was given by Cachazo & Skinner, [32] and formulated as a twistor string theory for maximal supergravity by David Skinner. [33] Analogous formulae were then found in all dimensions by Cachazo, He & Yuan for Yang–Mills theory and gravity [34] and subsequently for a variety of other theories. [35] They were then understood as string theories in ambitwistor space by Mason & Skinner [36] in a general framework that includes the original twistor string and extends to give a number of new models and formulae. [37] [38] [39] As string theories they have the same critical dimensions as conventional string theory; for example the type II supersymmetric versions are critical in ten dimensions and are equivalent to the full field theory of type II supergravities in ten dimensions (this is distinct from conventional string theories that also have a further infinite hierarchy of massive higher spin states that provide an ultraviolet completion). They extend to give formulae for loop amplitudes [40] [41] and can be defined on curved backgrounds. [42]

The twistor correspondence

Denote Minkowski space by , with coordinates and Lorentzian metric signature . Introduce 2-component spinor indices and set

Non-projective twistor space is a four-dimensional complex vector space with coordinates denoted by where and are two constant Weyl spinors. The hermitian form can be expressed by defining a complex conjugation from to its dual by so that the Hermitian form can be expressed as

This together with the holomorphic volume form, is invariant under the group SU(2,2), a quadruple cover of the conformal group C(1,3) of compactified Minkowski spacetime.

Points in Minkowski space are related to subspaces of twistor space through the incidence relation

The incidence relation is preserved under an overall re-scaling of the twistor, so usually one works in projective twistor space which is isomorphic as a complex manifold to . A point thereby determines a line in parametrised by A twistor is easiest understood in space-time for complex values of the coordinates where it defines a totally null two-plane that is self-dual. Take to be real, then if vanishes, then lies on a light ray, whereas if is non-vanishing, there are no solutions, and indeed then corresponds to a massless particle with spin that are not localised in real space-time.

Variations

Supertwistors

Supertwistors are a supersymmetric extension of twistors introduced by Alan Ferber in 1978. [43] Non-projective twistor space is extended by fermionic coordinates where is the number of supersymmetries so that a twistor is now given by with anticommuting. The super conformal group naturally acts on this space and a supersymmetric version of the Penrose transform takes cohomology classes on supertwistor space to massless supersymmetric multiplets on super Minkowski space. The case provides the target for Penrose's original twistor string and the case is that for Skinner's supergravity generalisation.

Higher dimensional generalization of the Klein correspondence

A higher dimensional generalization of the Klein correspondence underlying twistor theory, applicable to isotropic subspaces of conformally compactified (complexified) Minkowski space and its super-space extensions, was developed by J. Harnad and S. Shnider. [4] [5]

Hyperkähler manifolds

Hyperkähler manifolds of dimension also admit a twistor correspondence with a twistor space of complex dimension . [44]

Palatial twistor theory

The nonlinear graviton construction encodes only anti-self-dual, i.e., left-handed fields. [8] A first step towards the problem of modifying twistor space so as to encode a general gravitational field is the encoding of right-handed fields. Infinitesimally, these are encoded in twistor functions or cohomology classes of homogeneity −6. The task of using such twistor functions in a fully nonlinear way so as to obtain a right-handed nonlinear graviton has been referred to as the (gravitational) googly problem. [45] (The word "googly" is a term used in the game of cricket for a ball bowled with right-handed helicity using the apparent action that would normally give rise to left-handed helicity.) The most recent proposal in this direction by Penrose in 2015 was based on noncommutative geometry on twistor space and referred to as palatial twistor theory. [46] The theory is named after Buckingham Palace, where Michael Atiyah [47] suggested to Penrose the use of a type of "noncommutative algebra", an important component of the theory. (The underlying twistor structure in palatial twistor theory was modeled not on the twistor space but on the non-commutative holomorphic twistor quantum algebra.)

See also

Notes

  1. Penrose, R. (1967). "Twistor Algebra". Journal of Mathematical Physics . 8 (2): 345–366. Bibcode:1967JMP.....8..345P. doi:10.1063/1.1705200.
  2. Penrose, R.; MacCallum, M.A.H. (1973). "Twistor theory: An approach to the quantisation of fields and space-time". Physics Reports. 6 (4): 241–315. Bibcode:1973PhR.....6..241P. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(73)90008-2.
  3. Penrose, Roger (1987). "On the Origins of Twistor Theory". In Rindler, Wolfgang; Trautman, Andrzej (eds.). Gravitation and Geometry, a Volume in Honour of Ivor Robinson. Bibliopolis. ISBN   88-7088-142-3.
  4. 1 2 Harnad, J.; Shnider, S. (1992). "Isotropic geometry and twistors in higher dimensions. I. The generalized Klein correspondence and spinor flags in even dimensions". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 33 (9): 3197–3208. doi:10.1063/1.529538.
  5. 1 2 Harnad, J.; Shnider, S. (1995). "Isotropic geometry and twistors in higher dimensions. II. Odd dimensions, reality conditions, and twistor superspaces". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 36 (9): 1945–1970. doi:10.1063/1.531096.
  6. Penrose, Roger; Rindler, Wolfgang (1986). Spinors and Space-Time. Cambridge University Press. pp. Appendix. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511524486. ISBN   9780521252676.
  7. Hughston, L. P.; Mason, L. J. (1988). "A generalised Kerr-Robinson theorem". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 5 (2): 275. Bibcode:1988CQGra...5..275H. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/5/2/007. ISSN   0264-9381. S2CID   250783071.
  8. 1 2 Penrose, R (1976). "Non-linear gravitons and curved twistor theory". Gen. Rel. Grav. 7 (1): 31–52. Bibcode:1976GReGr...7...31P. doi:10.1007/BF00762011. S2CID   123258136.
  9. Ward, R. S. (1977). "On self-dual gauge fields". Physics Letters A. 61 (2): 81–82. Bibcode:1977PhLA...61...81W. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(77)90842-8.
  10. Ward, R. S. (1990). Twistor geometry and field theory. Wells, R. O. (Raymond O'Neil), 1940-. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0521422680. OCLC   17260289.
  11. Mason, Lionel J; Woodhouse, Nicholas M J (1996). Integrability, self-duality, and twistor theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN   9780198534983. OCLC   34545252.
  12. Dunajski, Maciej (2010). Solitons, instantons, and twistors. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780198570622. OCLC   507435856.
  13. Atiyah, M.F.; Hitchin, N.J.; Drinfeld, V.G.; Manin, Yu.I. (1978). "Construction of instantons". Physics Letters A. 65 (3): 185–187. Bibcode:1978PhLA...65..185A. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(78)90141-x.
  14. 1 2 3 Isenberg, James; Yasskin, Philip B.; Green, Paul S. (1978). "Non-self-dual gauge fields". Physics Letters B. 78 (4): 462–464. Bibcode:1978PhLB...78..462I. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90486-0.
  15. 1 2 Witten, Edward (1978). "An interpretation of classical Yang–Mills theory". Physics Letters B. 77 (4–5): 394–398. Bibcode:1978PhLB...77..394W. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90585-3.
  16. Harnad, J.; Légaré, M.; Hurtubise, J.; Shnider, S. (1985). "Constraint equations and field equations in supersymmetric N = 3 Yang-Mills theory". Nuclear Physics B. 256: 609–620. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90410-9.
  17. Harnad, J.; Hurtubise, J.; Shnider, S. (1989). "Supersymmetric Yang-Mills equations and supertwistors". Annals of Physics. 193 (1): 40–79. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(89)90351-5.
  18. Witten, E. (1986). "Twistor-like transform in ten dimensions". Nuclear Physics. B266 (2): 245–264. Bibcode:1986NuPhB.266..245W. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90090-8.
  19. Harnad, J.; Shnider, S. (1986). "Constraints and Field Equations for Ten Dimensional Super Yang-Mills Theory". Commun. Math. Phys. 106 (2): 183–199. Bibcode:1986CMaPh.106..183H. doi:10.1007/BF01454971. S2CID   122622189.
  20. Witten, Edward (2004). "Perturbative Gauge Theory as a String Theory in Twistor Space". Communications in Mathematical Physics. 252 (1–3): 189–258. arXiv: hep-th/0312171 . Bibcode:2004CMaPh.252..189W. doi:10.1007/s00220-004-1187-3. S2CID   14300396.
  21. Roiban, Radu; Spradlin, Marcus; Volovich, Anastasia (2004-07-30). "Tree-level S matrix of Yang–Mills theory". Physical Review D. 70 (2): 026009. arXiv: hep-th/0403190 . Bibcode:2004PhRvD..70b6009R. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.026009. S2CID   10561912.
  22. Berkovits, Nathan; Witten, Edward (2004). "Conformal supergravity in twistor-string theory". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2004 (8): 009. arXiv: hep-th/0406051 . Bibcode:2004JHEP...08..009B. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/08/009. ISSN   1126-6708. S2CID   119073647.
  23. Cachazo, Freddy; Svrcek, Peter; Witten, Edward (2004). "MHV vertices and tree amplitudes in gauge theory". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2004 (9): 006. arXiv: hep-th/0403047 . Bibcode:2004JHEP...09..006C. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/09/006. ISSN   1126-6708. S2CID   16328643.
  24. Adamo, Tim; Bullimore, Mathew; Mason, Lionel; Skinner, David (2011). "Scattering amplitudes and Wilson loops in twistor space". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. 44 (45): 454008. arXiv: 1104.2890 . Bibcode:2011JPhA...44S4008A. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/45/454008. S2CID   59150535.
  25. Britto, Ruth; Cachazo, Freddy; Feng, Bo; Witten, Edward (2005-05-10). "Direct Proof of the Tree-Level Scattering Amplitude Recursion Relation in Yang–Mills Theory". Physical Review Letters. 94 (18): 181602. arXiv: hep-th/0501052 . Bibcode:2005PhRvL..94r1602B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.181602. PMID   15904356. S2CID   10180346.
  26. Mason, Lionel; Skinner, David (2010-01-01). "Scattering amplitudes and BCFW recursion in twistor space". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2010 (1): 64. arXiv: 0903.2083 . Bibcode:2010JHEP...01..064M. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2010)064. ISSN   1029-8479. S2CID   8543696.
  27. Arkani-Hamed, N.; Cachazo, F.; Cheung, C.; Kaplan, J. (2010-03-01). "The S-matrix in twistor space". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2010 (3): 110. arXiv: 0903.2110 . Bibcode:2010JHEP...03..110A. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2010)110. ISSN   1029-8479. S2CID   15898218.
  28. Arkani-Hamed, N.; Cachazo, F.; Cheung, C.; Kaplan, J. (2010-03-01). "A duality for the S matrix". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2010 (3): 20. arXiv: 0907.5418 . Bibcode:2010JHEP...03..020A. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2010)020. ISSN   1029-8479. S2CID   5771375.
  29. Mason, Lionel; Skinner, David (2009). "Dual superconformal invariance, momentum twistors and Grassmannians". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2009 (11): 045. arXiv: 0909.0250 . Bibcode:2009JHEP...11..045M. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/11/045. ISSN   1126-6708. S2CID   8375814.
  30. Hodges, Andrew (2013-05-01). "Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2013 (5): 135. arXiv: 0905.1473 . Bibcode:2013JHEP...05..135H. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2013)135. ISSN   1029-8479. S2CID   18360641.
  31. Arkani-Hamed, Nima; Bourjaily, Jacob L.; Cachazo, Freddy; Goncharov, Alexander B.; Postnikov, Alexander; Trnka, Jaroslav (2012-12-21). "Scattering Amplitudes and the Positive Grassmannian". arXiv: 1212.5605 [hep-th].
  32. Cachazo, Freddy; Skinner, David (2013-04-16). "Gravity from Rational Curves in Twistor Space". Physical Review Letters. 110 (16): 161301. arXiv: 1207.0741 . Bibcode:2013PhRvL.110p1301C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.161301. PMID   23679592. S2CID   7452729.
  33. Skinner, David (2013-01-04). "Twistor Strings for N=8 Supergravity". arXiv: 1301.0868 [hep-th].
  34. Cachazo, Freddy; He, Song; Yuan, Ellis Ye (2014-07-01). "Scattering of massless particles: scalars, gluons and gravitons". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2014 (7): 33. arXiv: 1309.0885 . Bibcode:2014JHEP...07..033C. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)033. ISSN   1029-8479. S2CID   53685436.
  35. Cachazo, Freddy; He, Song; Yuan, Ellis Ye (2015-07-01). "Scattering equations and matrices: from Einstein to Yang–Mills, DBI and NLSM". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015 (7): 149. arXiv: 1412.3479 . Bibcode:2015JHEP...07..149C. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)149. ISSN   1029-8479. S2CID   54062406.
  36. Mason, Lionel; Skinner, David (2014-07-01). "Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2014 (7): 48. arXiv: 1311.2564 . Bibcode:2014JHEP...07..048M. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)048. ISSN   1029-8479. S2CID   53666173.
  37. Berkovits, Nathan (2014-03-01). "Infinite tension limit of the pure spinor superstring". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2014 (3): 17. arXiv: 1311.4156 . Bibcode:2014JHEP...03..017B. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2014)017. ISSN   1029-8479. S2CID   28346354.
  38. Geyer, Yvonne; Lipstein, Arthur E.; Mason, Lionel (2014-08-19). "Ambitwistor Strings in Four Dimensions". Physical Review Letters. 113 (8): 081602. arXiv: 1404.6219 . Bibcode:2014PhRvL.113h1602G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.081602. PMID   25192087. S2CID   40855791.
  39. Casali, Eduardo; Geyer, Yvonne; Mason, Lionel; Monteiro, Ricardo; Roehrig, Kai A. (2015-11-01). "New ambitwistor string theories". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015 (11): 38. arXiv: 1506.08771 . Bibcode:2015JHEP...11..038C. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)038. ISSN   1029-8479. S2CID   118801547.
  40. Adamo, Tim; Casali, Eduardo; Skinner, David (2014-04-01). "Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations at one loop". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2014 (4): 104. arXiv: 1312.3828 . Bibcode:2014JHEP...04..104A. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2014)104. ISSN   1029-8479. S2CID   119194796.
  41. Geyer, Yvonne; Mason, Lionel; Monteiro, Ricardo; Tourkine, Piotr (2015-09-16). "Loop Integrands for Scattering Amplitudes from the Riemann Sphere". Physical Review Letters. 115 (12): 121603. arXiv: 1507.00321 . Bibcode:2015PhRvL.115l1603G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.121603. PMID   26430983. S2CID   36625491.
  42. Adamo, Tim; Casali, Eduardo; Skinner, David (2015-02-01). "A worldsheet theory for supergravity". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015 (2): 116. arXiv: 1409.5656 . Bibcode:2015JHEP...02..116A. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)116. ISSN   1029-8479. S2CID   119234027.
  43. Ferber, A. (1978), "Supertwistors and conformal supersymmetry", Nuclear Physics B, 132 (1): 55–64, Bibcode:1978NuPhB.132...55F, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90257-2.
  44. Hitchin, N. J.; Karlhede, A.; Lindström, U.; Roček, M. (1987). "Hyper-Kähler metrics and supersymmetry". Communications in Mathematical Physics. 108 (4): 535–589. Bibcode:1987CMaPh.108..535H. doi:10.1007/BF01214418. ISSN   0010-3616. MR   0877637. S2CID   120041594.
  45. Penrose 2004, p. 1000.
  46. Penrose, Roger (2015). "Palatial twistor theory and the twistor googly problem". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 373 (2047): 20140237. Bibcode:2015RSPTA.37340237P. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0237 . PMID   26124255. S2CID   13038470.
  47. "Michael Atiyah's Imaginative State of Mind" Quanta Magazine

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Loop quantum gravity</span> Theory of quantum gravity, merging quantum mechanics and general relativity

Loop quantum gravity (LQG) is a theory of quantum gravity, which aims to reconcile quantum mechanics and general relativity, incorporating matter of the Standard Model into the framework established for the intrinsic quantum gravity case. It is an attempt to develop a quantum theory of gravity based directly on Einstein's geometric formulation rather than the treatment of gravity as a mysterious mechanism (force). As a theory LQG postulates that the structure of space and time is composed of finite loops woven into an extremely fine fabric or network. These networks of loops are called spin networks. The evolution of a spin network, or spin foam, has a scale above the order of a Planck length, approximately 10−35 meters, and smaller scales are meaningless. Consequently, not just matter, but space itself, prefers an atomic structure. The areas of research, which involve about 30 research groups worldwide, share the basic physical assumptions and the mathematical description of quantum space. Research has evolved in two directions: the more traditional canonical loop quantum gravity, and the newer covariant loop quantum gravity, called spin foam theory. The most well-developed theory that has been advanced as a direct result of loop quantum gravity is called loop quantum cosmology (LQC). LQC advances the study of the early universe, incorporating the concept of the Big Bang into the broader theory of the Big Bounce, which envisions the Big Bang as the beginning of a period of expansion that follows a period of contraction, which one could talk of as the Big Crunch.

String field theory (SFT) is a formalism in string theory in which the dynamics of relativistic strings is reformulated in the language of quantum field theory. This is accomplished at the level of perturbation theory by finding a collection of vertices for joining and splitting strings, as well as string propagators, that give a Feynman diagram-like expansion for string scattering amplitudes. In most string field theories, this expansion is encoded by a classical action found by second-quantizing the free string and adding interaction terms. As is usually the case in second quantization, a classical field configuration of the second-quantized theory is given by a wave function in the original theory. In the case of string field theory, this implies that a classical configuration, usually called the string field, is given by an element of the free string Fock space.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anomaly (physics)</span> Asymmetry of classical and quantum action

In quantum physics an anomaly or quantum anomaly is the failure of a symmetry of a theory's classical action to be a symmetry of any regularization of the full quantum theory. In classical physics, a classical anomaly is the failure of a symmetry to be restored in the limit in which the symmetry-breaking parameter goes to zero. Perhaps the first known anomaly was the dissipative anomaly in turbulence: time-reversibility remains broken at the limit of vanishing viscosity.

The Chern–Simons theory is a 3-dimensional topological quantum field theory of Schwarz type developed by Edward Witten. It was discovered first by mathematical physicist Albert Schwarz. It is named after mathematicians Shiing-Shen Chern and James Harris Simons, who introduced the Chern–Simons 3-form. In the Chern–Simons theory, the action is proportional to the integral of the Chern–Simons 3-form.

In theoretical physics, S-duality is an equivalence of two physical theories, which may be either quantum field theories or string theories. S-duality is useful for doing calculations in theoretical physics because it relates a theory in which calculations are difficult to a theory in which they are easier.

Montonen–Olive duality or electric–magnetic duality is the oldest known example of strong–weak duality or S-duality according to current terminology. It generalizes the electro-magnetic symmetry of Maxwell's equations by stating that magnetic monopoles, which are usually viewed as emergent quasiparticles that are "composite", can in fact be viewed as "elementary" quantized particles with electrons playing the reverse role of "composite" topological solitons; the viewpoints are equivalent and the situation dependent on the duality. It was later proven to hold true when dealing with a N = 4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory. It is named after Finnish physicist Claus Montonen and British physicist David Olive after they proposed the idea in their academic paper Magnetic monopoles as gauge particles? where they state:

There should be two "dual equivalent" field formulations of the same theory in which electric (Noether) and magnetic (topological) quantum numbers exchange roles.

In theoretical physics, Seiberg–Witten theory is an supersymmetric gauge theory with an exact low-energy effective action, of which the kinetic part coincides with the Kähler potential of the moduli space of vacua. Before taking the low-energy effective action, the theory is known as supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory, as the field content is a single vector supermultiplet, analogous to the field content of Yang–Mills theory being a single vector gauge field or connection.

In the domain of mathematics known as representation theory, pure spinors are spinors that are annihilated under the Clifford action by a maximal isotropic subspace of the space of vectors with respect to the scalar product determining the Clifford algebra. They were introduced by Élie Cartan in the 1930s to classify complex structures and were further developed by Claude Chevalley. Pure spinors were a key ingredient in the study of spin geometry and twistor theory, introduced by Roger Penrose in the 1960s. They were further applied to the study of (super) Yang-Mills theory in 10D and to superstrings.

In theoretical physics, the Penrose transform, introduced by Roger Penrose, is a complex analogue of the Radon transform that relates massless fields on spacetime, or more precisely the space of solutions to massless field equations to sheaf cohomology groups on complex projective space. The projective space in question is the twistor space, a geometrical space naturally associated to the original spacetime, and the twistor transform is also geometrically natural in the sense of integral geometry. The Penrose transform is a major component of classical twistor theory.

In mathematics, and especially gauge theory, Seiberg–Witten invariants are invariants of compact smooth oriented 4-manifolds introduced by Edward Witten (1994), using the Seiberg–Witten theory studied by Nathan Seiberg and Witten during their investigations of Seiberg–Witten gauge theory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MHV amplitudes</span> Maximally helicity violating amplitudes

In theoretical particle physics, maximally helicity violating amplitudes (MHV) are amplitudes with massless external gauge bosons, where gauge bosons have a particular helicity and the other two have the opposite helicity. These amplitudes are called MHV amplitudes, because at tree level, they violate helicity conservation to the maximum extent possible. The tree amplitudes in which all gauge bosons have the same helicity or all but one have the same helicity vanish.

N = 4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills (SYM) theory is a relativistic conformally invariant Lagrangian gauge theory describing fermions interacting via gauge field exchanges. In D=4 spacetime dimensions, N=4 is the maximal number of supersymmetries or supersymmetry charges.

Twistor string theory is an equivalence between N = 4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory and the perturbative topological B model string theory in twistor space.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amplituhedron</span> Geometric structure used in certain particle interactions

In mathematics and theoretical physics, an amplituhedron is a geometric structure introduced in 2013 by Nima Arkani-Hamed and Jaroslav Trnka. It enables simplified calculation of particle interactions in some quantum field theories. In planar N = 4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory, also equivalent to the perturbative topological B model string theory in twistor space, an amplituhedron is defined as a mathematical space known as the positive Grassmannian.

The Britto–Cachazo–Feng–Witten recursion relations are a set of on-shell recursion relations in quantum field theory. They are named for their creators, Ruth Britto, Freddy Cachazo, Bo Feng and Edward Witten.

Higher-spin theory or higher-spin gravity is a common name for field theories that contain massless fields of spin greater than two. Usually, the spectrum of such theories contains the graviton as a massless spin-two field, which explains the second name. Massless fields are gauge fields and the theories should be (almost) completely fixed by these higher-spin symmetries. Higher-spin theories are supposed to be consistent quantum theories and, for this reason, to give examples of quantum gravity. Most of the interest in the topic is due to the AdS/CFT correspondence where there is a number of conjectures relating higher-spin theories to weakly coupled conformal field theories. It is important to note that only certain parts of these theories are known at present and not many examples have been worked out in detail except some specific toy models.

In mathematics, the ring of modular forms associated to a subgroup Γ of the special linear group SL(2, Z) is the graded ring generated by the modular forms of Γ. The study of rings of modular forms describes the algebraic structure of the space of modular forms.

Olaf Lechtenfeld is a German mathematical physicist, academic and researcher. He is a full professor at the Institute of Theoretical Physics at Leibniz University, where he founded the Riemann Center for Geometry and Physics.

In mathematical physics, two-dimensional Yang–Mills theory is the special case of Yang–Mills theory in which the dimension of spacetime is taken to be two. This special case allows for a rigorously defined Yang–Mills measure, meaning that the (Euclidean) path integral can be interpreted as a measure on the set of connections modulo gauge transformations. This situation contrasts with the four-dimensional case, where a rigorous construction of the theory as a measure is currently unknown.

In mathematical physics, four-dimensional Chern–Simons theory, also known as semi-holomorphic or semi-topological Chern–Simons theory, is a quantum field theory initially defined by Nikita Nekrasov, rediscovered and studied by Kevin Costello, and later by Edward Witten and Masahito Yamazaki. It is named after mathematicians Shiing-Shen Chern and James Simons who discovered the Chern–Simons 3-form appearing in the theory.

References

Further reading