Religious interpretations of the Big Bang theory

Last updated

Since the emergence of the Big Bang theory as the dominant physical cosmological paradigm, there have been a variety of reactions by religious groups regarding its implications for religious cosmologies. Some accept the scientific evidence at face value, some seek to harmonize the Big Bang with their religious tenets, and some reject or ignore the evidence for the Big Bang theory. [1]

Contents

Background

The Big Bang itself is a scientific theory, and as such, stands or falls by its agreement with observations. [2] However, as a theory which addresses the nature of the universe since its earliest discernible existence, the Big Bang carries possible theological implications regarding the concept of creation out of nothing. [3] [4] [5] Many atheist philosophers have argued against the idea of the Universe having a beginning – the universe might simply have existed for all eternity, but with the emerging evidence of the Big Bang theory, both theists and physicists have viewed it as capable of being explained by theism; [6] [7] a popular philosophical argument for the existence of God known as the Kalam cosmological argument rests in the concepts of the Big Bang. [8] [9] In the 1920s and 1930s, almost every major cosmologist preferred an eternal steady state universe, and several complained that the beginning of time implied by the Big Bang imported religious concepts into physics; this objection was later repeated by supporters of the steady-state theory, [10] who rejected the implication that the universe had a beginning. [11] [12]

Hinduism

The view from the Hindu Puranas is that of an eternal universe cosmology in which time has no absolute beginning, but rather is infinite and cyclic, as opposed to a universe which originated from a Big Bang. [13] [14] However, the Encyclopædia of Hinduism , referencing Katha Upanishad 2:20, states that the Big Bang theory reminds humanity that everything came from the Brahman which is "subtler than the atom, greater than the greatest." [15] It consists of several "Big Bangs" and "Big Crunches" following each other in a cyclical manner. [16] [17] [18]

The Nasadiya Sukta , the Hymn of Creation in the Rigveda (10:129), mentions the world beginning from nothing through the power of heat. [19] [20] This can be seen as corresponding to the Big Bang theory.

THEN was not non-existent nor existent: there was no realm of air, no sky beyond it. What covered in, and where? and what gave shelter? Was water there, unfathomed depth of water?

Rig Veda X.129.1

Death was not then, nor was there aught immortal: no sign was there, the day's and night's divider. That One Thing, breathless, breathed by its own nature: apart from it was nothing whatsoever

Rig Veda X.129.2

Several prominent modern scientists have remarked that Hinduism (and also Buddhism and Jainism by extension as all three faiths share most of these philosophies) is the only religion (or civilization) in all of recorded history, that has timescales and theories in astronomy (cosmology), that appear to correspond to those of modern scientific cosmology, e.g. Carl Sagan, [21] Niels Bohr, Erwin Schrödinger, Werner Heisenberg, [22] [23] [24] Robert Oppenheimer, [25] George Sudarshan, [26] Fritjof Capra [27] etc. Sir Roger Penrose is among the present-day physicists that believe in a cyclical model for the Universe, wherein there are alternating cycles consisting of Big Bangs and Big Crunches, and he describes this model to be "a bit more like Hindu philosophy" as compared to the Abrahamic faiths. [28]

Christianity

The Big Bang theory was partly developed by a Catholic priest, Georges Lemaître, who believed that there was neither a connection nor a conflict between his religion and his science. [29] At the November 22, 1951, opening meeting of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Pope Pius XII declared that the Big Bang theory does not conflict with the Catholic concept of creation. [30] [31] Some Conservative Protestant Christian denominations have also welcomed the Big Bang theory as supporting a historical interpretation of the doctrine of creation; [32] however, adherents of Young Earth creationism, who advocate a very literal interpretation of the Book of Genesis, tend to reject the theory. [33]

Baháʼí Faith

Bahá’u’lláh, the founder of the Baháʼí Faith, has taught that the universe has "neither beginning nor ending". [34] In the Tablet of Wisdom ("Lawh-i-Hikmat", written 1873–1874). Bahá'u'lláh states: "That which hath been in existence had existed before, but not in the form thou seest today. The world of existence came into being through the heat generated from the interaction between the active force and that which is its recipient. These two are the same, yet they are different." The terminology used here refers to ancient Greek and Islamic philosophy (al-Kindi, Avicenna, Fakhr al-Din al-Razi and Shaykh Ahmad). [35] [36] In an early text, Bahá’u’lláh describes the successive creation of the four natures heat and cold (the active force), dryness and moisture (the recipients), and the four elements fire, air, water and earth. [35] About the phrase "That which hath been in existence had existed before, but not in the form thou seest today," 'Abdu'l-Bahá has stated that it means that the universe is evolving. [35] He also states that "the substance and primary matter of contingent beings is the ethereal power, which is invisible and only known through its effects... Ethereal matter is itself both the active force and the recipient... it is the sign of the Primal Will in the phenomenal world... The ethereal matter is, therefore, the cause, since light, heat, and electricity appear from it. It is also the effect, for as vibrations take place in it, they become visible...". [35]

Jean-Marc Lepain, Robin Mihrshahi, Dale E. Lehman and Julio Savi suggest a possible relation of this statement with the Big Bang theory. [37] [38] [39] [40]

Islam

Writing for the Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies, Haslin Hasan and Ab. Hafiz Mat Tuah wrote that modern scientific ideas on cosmology are creating new ideas on how to interpret the Quran's cosmogonical terms. [41] In particular, some modern-day Muslim groups have advocated for interpreting the term al-sama, traditionally believed to be a reference to both the sky and the seven heavens, [42] as instead referring to the universe as a whole.

Mirza Tahir Ahmad, head of the Ahmadiyya community, asserted in his book Revelation, Rationality, Knowledge & Truth that the Big Bang theory was foretold in the Quran. He referenced the verse 30 of the Sūrat al-Anbiyāʼ, which says that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity: [43] [44]

Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?

Quran   21:30

This view that the Qu'ran references the initial singularity of the Big Bang is also accepted by many Muslim scholars outside of the Ahmadiyya community such as Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri, who is a Sufi scholar, and Muhammad Asad, who was a nondenominational Muslim scholar. [45] [46] Further, some scholars such as Faheem Ashraf of the Islamic Research Foundation International, Inc. and Sheikh Omar Suleiman of the Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research argue that the scientific theory of an expanding universe is described in Sūrat adh-Dhāriyāt: [45] [47]

And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander.

Quran   51:47

Judaism

"That the universe had a definite starting point" was addressed in a 2014 article with the title "New Big Bang evidence supports Biblical creation, says Orthodox physicist." [48] Harvard's John Kovac called it a "smoking-gun signature." [49]

BBC asked and answered "Is the Big Bang theory compatible with Judaism." [50] Chabad/Lubavitch's website writes that it is science that caught up to the Torah's teachings regarding what today is called Big Bang. [51]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Big Bang</span> Physical theory

The Big Bang is a physical theory that describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature. The notion of an expanding universe was first scientifically originated by physicist Alexander Friedmann in 1922 with the mathematical derivation of the Friedmann equations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Creationism</span> Belief that nature originated through supernatural acts

Creationism is the religious belief that nature, and aspects such as the universe, Earth, life, and humans, originated with supernatural acts of divine creation. In its broadest sense, creationism includes a continuum of religious views, which vary in their acceptance or rejection of scientific explanations such as evolution that describe the origin and development of natural phenomena.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World</span> The totality of existing entities

The world is the totality of entities, the whole of reality, or everything that exists. The nature of the world has been conceptualized differently in different fields. Some conceptions see the world as unique, while others talk of a "plurality of worlds". Some treat the world as one simple object, while others analyze the world as a complex made up of parts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cosmogony</span> Branch of science or a theory concerning the origin of the universe

Cosmogony is any model concerning the origin of the cosmos or the universe.

A creator deity or creator god is a deity responsible for the creation of the Earth, world, and universe in human religion and mythology. In monotheism, the single God is often also the creator. A number of monolatristic traditions separate a secondary creator from a primary transcendent being, identified as a primary creator.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Georges Lemaître</span> Belgian scientist and Catholic priest (1894–1966)

Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître was a Belgian Catholic priest, theoretical physicist, and mathematician who made major contributions to cosmology and astrophysics. He was the first to argue that the recession of galaxies is evidence of an expanding universe and to connect the observational Hubble–Lemaître law with the solution to the Einstein field equations in the general theory of relativity for a homogenous and isotropic universe. That work led Lemaître to propose what he called the "hypothesis of the primeval atom", now regarded as the first formulation of the Big Bang theory of the origin of the universe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Old Earth creationism</span> Form of creationism

Old Earth Creationism (OEC) is an umbrella of theological views encompassing certain varieties of creationism which may or can include day-age creationism, gap creationism, progressive creationism, and sometimes theistic evolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Religious cosmology</span> Religious explanation

Religious cosmology is an explanation of the origin, evolution, and eventual fate of the universe from a religious perspective. This may include beliefs on origin in the form of a creation myth, subsequent evolution, current organizational form and nature, and eventual fate or destiny. There are various traditions in religion or religious mythology asserting how and why everything is the way it is and the significance of it all. Religious cosmologies describe the spatial lay-out of the universe in terms of the world in which people typically dwell as well as other dimensions, such as the seven dimensions of religion; these are ritual, experiential and emotional, narrative and mythical, doctrinal, ethical, social, and material.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kalam cosmological argument</span> Philosophical argument for the existence of God

The Kalam cosmological argument is a modern formulation of the cosmological argument for the existence of God. It is named after the Kalam from which many of its key ideas originated. Philosopher and theologian William Lane Craig was principally responsible for revitalizing these ideas for modern academic discourse through his book The Kalām Cosmological Argument (1979), as well as other publications.

<i>Creatio ex nihilo</i> Doctrine that matter was created from nothing

Creatio ex nihilo is the doctrine that matter is not eternal but had to be created by some divine creative act. It is a theistic answer to the question of how the universe came to exist. It is in contrast to creation ex materia, sometimes framed in terms of the dictum Ex nihilo nihil fit or "nothing comes from nothing", meaning all things were formed ex materia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cosmology</span> Scientific study of the origin, evolution, and eventual fate of the universe

Cosmology is a branch of physics and metaphysics dealing with the nature of the universe, the cosmos. The term cosmology was first used in English in 1656 in Thomas Blount's Glossographia, and in 1731 taken up in Latin by German philosopher Christian Wolff in Cosmologia Generalis. Religious or mythological cosmology is a body of beliefs based on mythological, religious, and esoteric literature and traditions of creation myths and eschatology. In the science of astronomy, cosmology is concerned with the study of the chronology of the universe.

In philosophy, theophysics is an approach to cosmology that attempts to reconcile physical cosmology and religious cosmology. It is related to physicotheology, the difference between them being that the aim of physicotheology is to derive theology from physics, whereas that of theophysics is to unify physics and theology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Big Bang theory</span> History of a cosmological theory

The history of the Big Bang theory began with the Big Bang's development from observations and theoretical considerations. Much of the theoretical work in cosmology now involves extensions and refinements to the basic Big Bang model. The theory itself was originally formalised by Father Georges Lemaître in 1927. Hubble's law of the expansion of the universe provided foundational support for the theory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baháʼí Faith and the unity of religion</span> Core teaching of the Baháʼí Faith

Unity of religion is a core teaching of the Baháʼí Faith which states that there is a fundamental unity in many of the world's religions. The principle states that the teachings of the major religions are part of a single plan directed from the same God. It is one of the core teachings of the Baháʼí Faith, alongside the unity of God, and the unity of humanity.

Muslim scholars have developed a spectrum of viewpoints on science within the context of Islam. Scientists of medieval Muslim civilization contributed to the new discoveries in science. From the eighth to fifteenth century, Muslim mathematicians and astronomers furthered the development of mathematics. Concerns have been raised about the lack of scientific literacy in parts of the modern Muslim world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baháʼí cosmology</span> Baháʼí view on reality

In Baháʼí cosmology reality is divided into three divisions. The first division is God, who is preexistent and on whom the rest of creation is contingent. The second division is God's Logos, the Primal Will, which is the realm of God's commands and grace. This realm pervades all created things. The Manifestations of God, Messengers from God, are appearances of the Logos in the physical world. The third division is Creation, which includes the physical world. Creation is not seen as confined to the material universe, and individual material objects, such as the Earth, are seen to come into being at a particular moment and subsequently to break down into their constituent parts. Thus, the current universe is seen as a result of a long-lasting process, evolving to its current state. In the Baháʼí Faith, the whole universe is a sign of God and is dependent on him and humanity was created to know God and to serve his purpose.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to metaphysics:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baháʼí Faith and Hinduism</span>

Hinduism is recognized in the Baháʼí Faith as one of nine known religions. Krishna is included in the succession of Manifestations of God.

Although biological evolution has been vocally opposed by some religious groups, many other groups accept the scientific position, sometimes with additions to allow for theological considerations. The positions of such groups are described by terms including "theistic evolution", "theistic evolutionism" or "evolutionary creation". Of all the religious groups included on the chart, Buddhists are the most accepting of evolution. Theistic evolutionists believe that there is a God, that God is the creator of the material universe and all life within, and that biological evolution is a natural process within that creation. Evolution, according to this view, is simply a tool that God employed to develop human life. According to the American Scientific Affiliation, a Christian organization of scientists:

A theory of theistic evolution (TE) — also called evolutionary creation — proposes that God's method of creation was to cleverly design a universe in which everything would naturally evolve. Usually the "evolution" in "theistic evolution" means Total Evolution — astronomical evolution and geological evolution plus chemical evolution and biological evolution — but it can refer only to biological evolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">A Hidden Treasure</span> Prominent Hadith in Islamic mysticism and philosophy

The Hadith of the Hidden Treasure is a hadith qudsi that has a very prominent role in Islamic mysticism and Islamic philosophy.

References

  1. Wright, E.L (24 May 2009). "Cosmology and". Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial. Retrieved 2009-10-15.
  2. Kragh, Helge (1996). Cosmology and Controversy . Princeton University Press. p.  ?. ISBN   978-0-691-00546-1.[ page needed ]
  3. Ellis, George F. R. (2007). "Issues in the Philosophy of Cosmology". Philosophy of Physics. pp. 1183–1285. arXiv: astro-ph/0602280 . CiteSeerX   10.1.1.338.6650 . doi:10.1016/B978-044451560-5/50014-2. ISBN   978-0444515605. S2CID   118897904.
  4. Alexander, Vilenkin (1982-11-04). "Creation of universes from nothing". Physics Letters B. 117 (1–2): 25–28. Bibcode:1982PhLB..117...25V. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90866-8. ISSN   0370-2693.
  5. Manson, N.A. (1993). God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge. ISBN   978-0-415-26344-3. The Big Bang theory strikes many people as having theological implications, as shown by those who do not welcome those implications.
  6. Harris, J.F. (2002). Analytic Philosophy of Religion. Springer Press. ISBN   978-1-4020-0530-5. Both theists and physicists have seen the big bang theory as leaving open such an opportunity for a theistic explanation.
  7. Eric J. Lerner (2010). The Big Bang Never Happened: A Startling Refutation of the Dominant Theory of the Origin of the Universe. Vintage Books. ISBN   978-0307773548 . Retrieved 2012-03-16. From theologians to physicists to novelists, it is widely believed that the Big Bang theory supports Christian concepts of a creator. In February 1989, for example, the front-page article of the New York Times Book Review argued that scientists argued that scientists and novelists were returning to God, in large part through the influence of the Big Bang.
  8. James Franklin Harris (2002). Analytic Philosophy of Religion. Springer Science. ISBN   978-1402005305. THE KALAM COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT Perhaps the best known and most clearly formulated version of the cosmological argument that incorporates the fundamental concepts of big bang theory is found in the work of William Lane Craig.
  9. McGrath, A.E. (2011). Science and Religion. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-1-4443-5808-7. It will be clear that this type of argument relates directly to modern cosmological research, particularly the "big bang" theory of the origins of the cosmos. This is also true of the kalam version of the cosmological argument, to which we now turn.
  10. Kragh, H. (1996). Cosmology and Controversy . Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. ISBN   978-0-691-02623-7.
  11. Harrison, P. (2010). The Cambridge Companion to Science and Religion. Cambridge University Press. p. 9. ISBN   978-0-521-71251-4. One reason for initial resistance to the Big Bang theory was that, unlike the rival Steady-State hypothesis, it proposed that the universe has a beginning – a proposition that for some had unwelcome religious implications.
  12. Kragh, H. (2008). Entropic Creation. Ashgate Publishing. p. 226. ISBN   978-0-7546-6414-7. Andrei Zhdanov, Stalin's notorious chief ideologue, said in a speech in 1947 that Lemaître and his kindred spirits were 'Falsifiers of science [who] wanted to revive the fairy tale of the origin of the world from nothing ... Another failure of the 'theory' in question consists in the fact that it brings us to the idealistic attitude of assuming the world to be finite.'
  13. Sushil Mittal; G. R. Thursby (2004). The Hindu World. Psychology Press. ISBN   978-0203644706. In the Vedic cosmogonies, the question of what caused the primordial desire does not arise; like the Big Bang of modern cosmology, the primal impulse is beyond all time and causation, so it makes no sense to ask what preceded it or what caused it. However, in the Hindu cosmology which we find in the Puranas and other non-Vedic Sanskrit texts, time has no absolute beginning; it is infinite and cyclic and so is kama.
  14. John R. Hinnells (2010). The Routledge companion to the study of religion. Taylor & Francis. ISBN   978-0415473286. There are also other cosmological models of the universe besides the Big bang model, including eternal universe theories – views more in keeping with Hindu cosmologies than with traditional theistic concepts of the cosmos.
  15. Sunil Sehgal (1999). Encyclopædia of Hinduism: T–Z, Volume 5. Sarup & Sons. ISBN   978-8176250641. The theory is known as the 'Big Bang theory' and it reminds us of the Hindu idea that everything came from the Brahman which is "subtler than the atom, greater than the greatest" (Kathopanishad-2-20).
  16. Moring, G. (1999). The Complete Idiot's Guide to Understanding Einstein. DK Publishing. p. 341. ISBN   978-0786542659 . Retrieved 2015-08-20.
  17. "Hinduism: Where Science and Spirituality Intersect | Gadadhara Pandit Dasa". huffingtonpost.com. 2011-09-20. Retrieved 2015-08-20.
  18. "Are Eastern Religions More Science-Friendly? | Philip Goldberg". huffingtonpost.com. 2010-07-05. Retrieved 2015-08-20.
  19. Kramer, Kenneth (1986). World scriptures: an introduction to comparative religions. Paulist Press. p. 34. ISBN   978-0-8091-2781-8.
  20. Swami Ranganathananda (1991). Human Being in Depth: A Scientific Approach to Religion. SUNY Press. p. 21. ISBN   978-0-7914-0679-3.
  21. "Quote by Carl Sagan: "The Hindu religion is the only one of the world..."". goodreads.com. Retrieved 2015-08-20.
  22. Hammer, O. (2003). Claiming Knowledge: Strategies of Epistemology from Theosophy to the New Age. Brill. p. 283. ISBN   978-9004136380 . Retrieved 2015-08-20.
  23. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 1994. p. 60. Retrieved 2015-08-20.
  24. Diem-Lane, A. (2016-01-11). Spooky Physics. MSAC Philosophy Group. p.  42 . Retrieved 2015-08-20.
  25. Thorpe, C. (2008). Oppenheimer: The Tragic Intellect. University of Chicago Press. p. 54. ISBN   978-0226798486 . Retrieved 2015-08-20.
  26. Narayanan, Anand (2013-01-24). "'All I know is how to do physics' – The Hindu". Chennai, India: thehindu.com. Retrieved 2015-08-20.
  27. "Fritjof Capra - Shiva's Cosmic Dance at CERN". Archived from the original on 2013-12-16. Retrieved 2012-09-30.
  28. McDowell, Adam (December 5, 2010). "What does the Penrose Big Bang theory mean for religions?". National Post.
  29. "Georges Lemaître, Father of the Big Bang". American Museum of Natural History. Archived from the original on 17 January 2013.
  30. Ferris, T. (1988). Coming of age in the Milky Way. Morrow. pp. 274, 438. ISBN   978-0-688-05889-0., citing Berger, A. (1984). The Big bang and Georges Lemaître: proceedings of a symposium in honour of G. Lemaître fifty years after his initiation of big-bang cosmology, Louvainla-Neuve, Belgium, 10–13 October 1983. D. Reidel. p. 387. ISBN   978-90-277-1848-8.
  31. Pope Pius XII (1951-11-02). "Ai soci della Pontificia Accademia delle Scienze, 22 novembre 1951 – Pio XII, Discorsi" (in Italian). Tipografia Poliglotta Vaticana. Retrieved 2012-02-23.
  32. Russell, R.J. (2008). Cosmology: From Alpha to Omega. Fortress Press. ISBN   978-0-8006-6273-8. Conservative Protestant circles have also welcomed Big Bang cosmology as supporting a historical interpretation of the doctrine of creation.
  33. Poole, Michael (2007). "The Scientific Enterprise and Teaching about Creation". Teaching About Scientific Origins: Taking Account of Creationism. Vol. 277. Peter Lang AG. pp. 75–88. JSTOR   42979075.
  34. Esslemont, J.E. (1980). Bahá'u'lláh and the New Era (5th ed.). Wilmette, Illinois: Baháʼí Publishing Trust. ISBN   978-0-87743-160-2.
  35. 1 2 3 4 Rafati, Vahid. Lawh-i-Hikmat: The Two Agents and the Two Patients . `Andalib, vol. 5, no. 19, pp. 29-38.
  36. Taherzadeh, A. (1987). The Revelation of Bahá'u'lláh, Volume 4: Mazra'ih & Bahji 1877-92. Oxford, UK: George Ronald. p. 42. ISBN   978-0-85398-270-8.
  37. Lepain, Jean-Marc (2015) [2002]. The Archeology of the Kingdom of God .
  38. Mihrshahi, Robin (2002). "Ether, Quantum Physics and the Baháʼí Writings". Australian Baháʼí Studies Journal. 4: 3–20.
  39. Lehman, Dale E. (2005). Cosmology and the Baháʼí Writings Archived 2014-11-28 at the Wayback Machine .
  40. Julio, Savi (1989). The Eternal Quest for God: An Introduction to the Divine Philosophy of 'Abdu'l-Bahá (PDF). Oxford, UK: George Ronald. p. 134. ISBN   978-0-85398-295-1.
  41. Hasan, Haslin; Mat Tuah, Ab. Hafiz (2014). "Quranic Cosmogony: Impact of Contemporary Cosmology on the Interpretation of Quranic Passages Relating to the Origin of the Universe" (PDF). Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies: 122–140. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 29, 2016. Retrieved October 28, 2016. Our study shows that modern scientific findings do indeed influence modern Muslims' understanding of the Quran's cosmogonical terms, concepts and narratives by modifying the older Tafsir sources, even deviating from them altogether and offering fresh ideas.
  42. Oliver Leaman, ed. (2005). The Qur'an: An Encyclopedia. Routledge. p. 258.
  43. Ahmad, Mirza Tahir. "The Quran and Cosmology". Al Islam. Retrieved 7 April 2017.
  44. "Big Bang Theory and Religion by Ron Kurtus – Succeed in Understanding Religion: School for Champions". www.school-for-champions.com. Retrieved 2017-01-06.
  45. 1 2 Ashraf, Faheem. "Islamic Concept of Creation of Universe Big Bang and Science-Religion Interaction" . Retrieved 3 March 2017.
  46. Asad, Muhammad (1984). The Message of the Qu'rán (PDF). Gibraltar, Spain: Dar al-Andalus Limited. p. 676. ISBN   978-1904510000.
  47. Guessoum, Nidhal (2010). Islam's Quantum Question: Reconciling Muslim Tradition and Modern Science (PDF). I.B.Tauris. p. 351. ISBN   978-0857730756 . Retrieved 3 March 2017.
  48. David Shamah (19 March 2014). "New Big Bang evidence supports Biblical creation, says Orthodox physicist". The Times of Israel . Retrieved July 11, 2024.
  49. Malcom Ritter (18 March 2014). "Scientists hail a first glimpse of 'the beginning of time'". The Times of Israel .
  50. "Is the Big Bang theory compatible with Judaism".
  51. Daniel Friedmann, How the Universe Came to Be: Torah and Science

Further reading