Brahman

Last updated

The (Om) Brahman_The Universal Soul symbol in Devanagari Aum Om black.svg
The (Om) Brahman_The Universal Soul symbol in Devanagari
A drop in the ocean: an analogy for Atman merging into Brahman Wassertropfen.jpg
A drop in the ocean: an analogy for Ātman merging into Brahman

In Hinduism, Brahman connotes the highest Universal Principle, the Ultimate Reality in the universe. [1] [2] [3] In major schools of Hindu philosophy, it is the material, efficient, formal and final cause of all that exists. [2] [4] [5] It is the pervasive, genderless, infinite, eternal truth and bliss which does not change, yet is the cause of all changes. [1] [3] [6] Brahman as a metaphysical concept is the single binding unity behind diversity in all that exists in the universe. [1] [7]

Contents

Brahman is a Vedic Sanskrit word, and it is conceptualized in Hinduism, states Paul Deussen, as the "creative principle which lies realized in the whole world". [8] Brahman is a key concept found in the Vedas, and it is extensively discussed in the early Upanishads. [9] The Vedas conceptualize Brahman as the Cosmic Principle. [10] In the Upanishads, it has been variously described as Sat-cit-ānanda (truth-consciousness-bliss) as well has having a form (Sakar) [11] [12] and as the unchanging, permanent, highest reality. [13] [14] [note 1] [note 2]

Brahman is discussed in Hindu texts with the concept of Atman (Self), [9] [17] personal, [note 3] impersonal [note 4] or Para Brahman, [note 5] or in various combinations of these qualities depending on the philosophical school. [18] In dualistic schools of Hinduism such as the theistic Dvaita Vedanta, Brahman is different from Atman (soul) in each being. [5] [19] [20] In non-dual schools such as the Advaita Vedanta, Brahman is identical to the Atman, is everywhere and inside each living being, and there is connected spiritual oneness in all existence. [6] [21] [22]

Sanskrit Brahman (an n-stem, nominative bráhmā) from a root bṛh- "to swell, expand, grow, enlarge" is a neuter noun to be distinguished from the masculine brahmán —denoting a person associated with Brahman, and from Brahmā, the creator God in the Hindu Trinity, the Trimurti. Brahman is thus a gender-neutral concept that implies greater impersonality than masculine or feminine conceptions of the deity. Brahman is referred to as the supreme self. Puligandla states it as "the unchanging reality amidst and beyond the world", [23] while Sinar states Brahman is a concept that "cannot be exactly defined". [24]

In Vedic Sanskrit:

In later Sanskrit usage:

These are distinct from:

History and literature

Vedic

Brahman is a concept present in Vedic Samhitas, the oldest layer of the Vedas dated to the 2nd millennium BCE. For example, [27]

The Ṛcs are limited (parimita),
The Samans are limited,
And the Yajuses are limited,
But of the Word Brahman, there is no end.

Taittiriya Samhita VII.3.1.4, Translated by Barbara Holdrege [27]

The concept Brahman is referred to in hundreds of hymns in the Vedas. [28] For example, it is found in Rig veda hymns such as 2.2.10, [29] 6.21.8, [30] 10.72.2 [31] and in Atharva veda hymns such as 6.122.5, 10.1.12, and 14.1.131. [28] The concept is found in various layers of the Vedic literature; for example: [28] Aitareya Brahmana 1.18.3, Kausitaki Brahmana 6.12, Satapatha Brahmana 13.5.2.5, Taittiriya Brahmana 2.8.8.10, Jaiminiya Brahmana 1.129, Taittiriya Aranyaka 4.4.1 through 5.4.1, Vajasaneyi Samhita 22.4 through 23.25, Maitrayani Samhita 3.12.1:16.2 through 4.9.2:122.15. The concept is extensively discussed in the Upanishads embedded in the Vedas (see next section), and also mentioned in the vedāṅga (the limbs of Vedas) such as the Srauta sutra 1.12.12 and Paraskara Gryhasutra 3.2.10 through 3.4.5. [28]

Jan Gonda states that the diverse reference of Brahman in the Vedic literature, starting with Rigveda Samhitas, convey "different senses or different shades of meaning". [32] There is no one single word in modern Western languages that can render the various shades of meaning of the word Brahman in the Vedic literature, according to Jan Gonda. [32] In verses considered as the most ancient, the Vedic idea of Brahman is the "power immanent in the sound, words, verses and formulas of Vedas". However, states Gonda, the verses suggest that this ancient meaning was never the only meaning, and the concept evolved and expanded in ancient India. [33]

Barbara Holdrege states that the concept Brahman is discussed in the Vedas along four major themes: as the Word or verses (Sabdabrahman), [34] as Knowledge embodied in Creator Principle, as Creation itself, and a Corpus of traditions. [35] Hananya Goodman states that the Vedas conceptualize Brahman as the Cosmic Principles underlying all that exists. [10] Gavin Flood states that the Vedic era witnessed a process of abstraction, where the concept of Brahman evolved and expanded from the power of sound, words and rituals to the "essence of the universe", the "deeper foundation of all phenomena", the "essence of the self (Atman, soul)", and the deeper "truth of a person beyond apparent difference". [36]

Upanishads

Swan (Hansa, hNs) is the symbol for Brahman-Atman in Hindu iconography. Mozzercork - Heart (by).jpg
Swan (Hansa, हंस) is the symbol for Brahman-Atman in Hindu iconography.

The primary focus on the early Upanishads is Brahmavidya and Atmavidya, that is the knowledge of Brahman and the knowledge of Atman (self, soul), what it is and how it is understood. [39] The texts do not present a single unified theory, rather they present a variety of themes with multiple possible interpretations, which flowered in post-Vedic era as premises for the diverse schools of Hinduism. [9]

Paul Deussen states that the concept of Brahman in the Upanishads expands to metaphysical, ontological and soteriological themes, such as it being the "primordial reality that creates, maintains and withdraws within it the universe", [40] the "principle of the world", [40] the "absolute", [41] the "general, universal", [42] the "cosmic principle", [43] the "ultimate that is the cause of everything including all gods", [44] the "divine being, Lord, distinct God, or God within oneself", [45] the "knowledge", [46] the "soul, sense of self of each human being that is fearless, luminuous, exalted and blissful", [47] the "essence of liberation, of spiritual freedom", [48] the "universe within each living being and the universe outside", [47] the "essence and everything innate in all that exists inside, outside and everywhere". [49]

Gavin Flood summarizes the concept of Brahman in the Upanishads to be the "essence, the smallest particle of the cosmos and the infinite universe", the "essence of all things which cannot be seen, though it can be experienced", the "self, soul within each person, each being", the "truth", the "reality", the "absolute", the "bliss" (ananda). [36]

According to Radhakrishnan, the sages of the Upanishads teach Brahman as the ultimate essence of material phenomena that cannot be seen or heard, but whose nature can be known through the development of self-knowledge ( atma jnana ). [50]

The Upanishads contain several mahā-vākyas or "Great Sayings" on the concept of Brahman: [51]

TextUpanishadTranslationReference
अहं ब्रह्म अस्मि
aham brahmāsmi
Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 1.4.10"I am Brahman" [52]
अयम् आत्मा ब्रह्म
ayam ātmā brahma
Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 4.4.5"The Self is Brahman" [53]
सर्वं खल्विदं ब्रह्म
sarvam khalvidam brahma
Chandogya Upanishad 3.14.1"All this is Brahman" [54]
एकमेवाद्वितीयम्
ekam evadvitiyam
Chandogya Upanishad 6.2.1"That [Brahman] is one, without a second" [55]
तत्त्वमसि
tat tvam asi
Chandogya Upanishad 6.8.7 et seq."Thou art that" ("You are Brahman") [56] [57]
प्रज्ञानं ब्रह्म
prajnānam brahma
Aitareya Upanishad 3.3.7"Wisdom is Brahman" [58]

The Upanishad discuss the metaphysical concept of Brahman in many ways, such as the Śāṇḍilya doctrine in Chapter 3 of the Chandogya Upanishad, among of the oldest Upanishadic texts. [59] The Śāṇḍilya doctrine on Brahman is not unique to Chandogya Upanishad, but found in other ancient texts such as the Satapatha Brahmana in section 10.6.3. It asserts that Atman (Soul, Self inside man) exists, the Brahman is identical with Atman, that the Brahman is inside man—thematic quotations that are frequently cited by later schools of Hinduism and modern studies on Indian philosophies. [59] [60] [61]

This whole universe is Brahman. In tranquility, let one worship It, as Tajjalan (that from which he came forth, as that into which he will be dissolved, as that in which he breathes).

Chandogya Upanishad 3.14.1 [59] [62]

Man is a creature of his Kratumaya (क्रतुमयः, will, purpose). Let him therefore have for himself this will, this purpose: The intelligent, whose body is imbued with life-principle, whose form is light, whose thoughts are driven by truth, whose self is like space (invisible but ever present), from whom all works, all desires, all sensory feelings encompassing this whole world, the silent, the unconcerned, this is me, my Self, my Soul within my heart.

Chandogya Upanishad 3.14.1 – 3.14.3 [59] [63]

This is my Soul in the innermost heart, greater than the earth, greater than the aerial space, greater than these worlds. This Soul, this Self of mine is that Brahman.

Chandogya Upanishad 3.14.3 – 3.14.4 [62] [63]

Paul Deussen notes that teachings similar to above on Brahman, re-appeared centuries later in the words of the 3rd century CE Neoplatonic Roman philosopher Plotinus in Enneades 5.1.2. [62]

Discussion

The concept Brahman has a lot of undertones of meaning and is difficult to understand. It has relevance in :

Brahman as a metaphysical concept

Brahman is the key metaphysical concept in various schools of Hindu philosophy. It is the theme in its diverse discussions to the two central questions of metaphysics: what is ultimately real, and are there principles applying to everything that is real? [64] Brahman is the ultimate "eternally, constant" reality, while the observed universe is a different kind of reality but one which is "temporary, changing" Maya in various orthodox Hindu schools. Maya pre-exists and co-exists with Brahman—the Ultimate Reality, The Highest Universal, the Cosmic Principles. [65]

In addition to the concept of Brahman, Hindu metaphysics includes the concept of Atman—or soul, self—which is also considered ultimately real. [65] The various schools of Hinduism, particularly the dual and non-dual schools, differ on the nature of Atman, whether it is distinct from Brahman, or same as Brahman. Those that consider Brahman and Atman as distinct are theistic, and Dvaita Vedanta and later Nyaya schools illustrate this premise. [66] Those that consider Brahman and Atman as same are monist or pantheistic, and Advaita Vedanta, later Samkhya [67] and Yoga schools illustrate this metaphysical premise. [68] [69] [70] In schools that equate Brahman with Atman, Brahman is the sole, ultimate reality. [71] The predominant teaching in the Upanishads is the spiritual identity of soul within each human being, with the soul of every other human being and living being, as well as with the supreme, ultimate reality Brahman. [72] [73]

In the metaphysics of the major schools of Hinduism, Maya is perceived reality, one that does not reveal the hidden principles, the true reality—the Brahman. Maya is unconscious, Brahman-Atman is conscious. Maya is the literal and the effect, Brahman is the figurative Upādāna—the principle and the cause. [65] Maya is born, changes, evolves, dies with time, from circumstances, due to invisible principles of nature. Atman-Brahman is eternal, unchanging, invisible principle, unaffected absolute and resplendent consciousness. Maya concept, states Archibald Gough, is "the indifferent aggregate of all the possibilities of emanatory or derived existences, pre-existing with Brahman", just like the possibility of a future tree pre-exists in the seed of the tree. [65]

While Hinduism sub-schools such as Advaita Vedanta emphasize the complete equivalence of Brahman and Atman, they also expound on Brahman as saguna Brahman —the Brahman with attributes, and nirguna Brahman —the Brahman without attributes. [74] The nirguna Brahman is the Brahman as it really is, however, the saguna Brahman is posited as a means to realizing nirguna Brahman, but the Hinduism schools declare saguna Brahman to be a part of the ultimate nirguna Brahman [75] The concept of the saguna Brahman, such as in the form of avatars, is considered in these schools of Hinduism to be a useful symbolism, path and tool for those who are still on their spiritual journey, but the concept is finally cast aside by the fully enlightened. [75]

Brahman as an ontological concept

Brahman, along with Soul/Self (Atman) are part of the ontological [76] premises of Indian philosophy. [77] [78] Different schools of Indian philosophy have held widely dissimilar ontologies. Buddhism and Carvaka school of Hinduism deny that there exists anything called "a soul, a self" (individual Atman or Brahman in the cosmic sense), while the orthodox schools of Hinduism, Jainism and Ajivikas hold that there exists "a soul, a self". [79] [80]

Brahman as well the Atman in every human being (and living being) is considered equivalent and the sole reality, the eternal, self-born, unlimited, innately free, blissful Absolute in schools of Hinduism such as the Advaita Vedanta and Yoga. [81] [82] [83] Knowing one's own self is knowing the God inside oneself, and this is held as the path to knowing the ontological nature of Brahman (universal Self) as it is identical to the Atman (individual Self). The nature of Atman-Brahman is held in these schools, states Barbara Holdrege, to be as a pure being (sat), consciousness (cit) and full of bliss (ananda), and it is formless, distinctionless, nonchanging and unbounded. [81]

In theistic schools, in contrast, such as Dvaita Vedanta, the nature of Brahman is held as eternal, unlimited, innately free, blissful Absolute, while each individual's soul is held as distinct and limited which can at best come close in eternal blissful love of the Brahman (therein viewed as the Godhead). [84]

Other schools of Hinduism have their own ontological premises relating to Brahman, reality and nature of existence. Vaisheshika school of Hinduism, for example, holds a substantial, realist ontology. [85] The Carvaka school denied Brahman and Atman, and held a materialist ontology. [86]

Brahman as an axiological concept

Brahman and Atman are key concepts to Hindu theories of axiology: ethics and aesthetics. [87] [88] Ananda (bliss), state Michael Myers and other scholars, has axiological importance to the concept of Brahman, as the universal inner harmony. [89] [90] Some scholars equate Brahman with the highest value, in an axiological sense. [91]

The axiological concepts of Brahman and Atman is central to Hindu theory of values. [92] A statement such as 'I am Brahman', states Shaw, means 'I am related to everything', and this is the underlying premise for compassion for others in Hinduism, for each individual's welfare, peace, or happiness depends on others, including other beings and nature at large, and vice versa. [93] Tietge states that even in non-dual schools of Hinduism where Brahman and Atman are treated ontologically equivalent, the theory of values emphasizes individual agent and ethics. In these schools of Hinduism, states Tietge, the theory of action are derived from and centered in compassion for the other, and not egotistical concern for the self. [94]

The axiological theory of values emerges implicitly from the concepts of Brahman and Atman, states Bauer. [95] The aesthetics of human experience and ethics are one consequence of self-knowledge in Hinduism, one resulting from the perfect, timeless unification of one's soul with the Brahman, the soul of everyone, everything and all eternity, wherein the pinnacle of human experience is not dependent on an afterlife, but pure consciousness in the present life itself. [95] It does not assume that an individual is weak nor does it presume that he is inherently evil, but the opposite: human soul and its nature is held as fundamentally unqualified, faultless, beautiful, blissful, ethical, compassionate and good. [95] [96] Ignorance is to assume it evil, liberation is to know its eternal, expansive, pristine, happy and good nature. [95] The axiological premises in the Hindu thought and Indian philosophies in general, states Nikam, is to elevate the individual, exalting the innate potential of man, where the reality of his being is the objective reality of the universe. [97] The Upanishads of Hinduism, summarizes Nikam, hold that the individual has the same essence and reality as the objective universe, and this essence is the finest essence; the individual soul is the universal soul, and Atman is the same reality and the same aesthetics as the Brahman. [97]

Brahman as a teleological concept

Brahman and Atman are very important teleological concepts. Teleology deals with the apparent purpose, principle or goal of something. In the first chapter of the Shvetashvatara Upanishad, these questions are dealt with. It says :

"People who make inquiries about brahman say:

What is the cause of Brahman? Why were we born? By what do we live? On what are we established? Governed by whom, O you who know Brahman, do we live in pleasure and in pain, each in our respective situation?

Svetashvatara Upanishad, Hymns 1.1 [98] [99]

The main purpose of the Brahman and why it exists is a subjective question according to the Upanishads. One can only find out its true purpose when one becomes the Brahman as the 'Brahman' is all the knowledge one can know itself. Hence, complete answers for anything in life can only be determined or obtained when the Brahman is realized as the Brahman is all the complete knowledge itself. This is said in the Aitareya Upanishad 3.3 and Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 4.4.17 and many other Upanishads.

Knowledge is the eye of all that, and on knowledge it is founded. Knowledge is the eye of the world, and knowledge, the foundation. Brahman is knowing.

Aitereya Upanishad, Hymns 3.3 [100] [101]

One of the reasons to why the Brahman should be realized according to the Upanishads is because it removes suffering from a person's life. This is because the person has the ability and knowledge to discriminate between the unchanging (Atman and Brahman) and the ever-changing (Prakrit) and so the person is not attached to the transient. Hence, the person is only content with the self and not his body or anything other than the self.

In Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 3.9.26 it mentions that the atman 'neither trembles in fear nor suffers injury' and in the Isha Upanishad 6-7 it too talks about suffering as non existent when one becomes the Brahman as they see the self in all beings and all beings in the self. Therefore, the apparent purpose of Brahman is in discussion in the Upanishads but the Brahman itself is the only self-contained purpose and true goal according to the Upanishads, so posing the question is redundant. The Upanishads consider the Brahman the only actual worthwhile goal in life and ultimately one should aim to become it as it is the means and an end in and of itself to ultimate knowledge, immortality, etc. So the question of what is the ultimate purpose of everything including the Brahman is answered by realizing or attaining the Brahman as the Brahman itself is ultimate knowledge. Hence, the Brahman is a teleological concept as it is the ultimate purpose and goal of everything possible and permeates everything and is in everything.

Brahman as a soteriological concept: Moksha

The orthodox schools of Hinduism, particularly Vedanta, Samkhya and Yoga schools, focus on the concept of Brahman and Atman in their discussion of moksha. The Advaita Vedanta holds there is no being/non-being distinction between Atman and Brahman. The knowledge of Atman (Self-knowledge) is synonymous to the knowledge of Brahman inside the person and outside the person. Furthermore, the knowledge of Brahman leads to a sense of oneness with all existence, self-realization, indescribable joy, and moksha (freedom, bliss), [102] because Brahman-Atman is the origin and end of all things, the universal principle behind and at source of everything that exists, consciousness that pervades everything and everyone. [103]

The theistic sub-school such as Dvaita Vedanta of Hinduism, starts with the same premises, but adds the premise that individual souls and Brahman are distinct, and thereby reaches entirely different conclusions where Brahman is conceptualized in a manner similar to God in other major world religions. [19] The theistic schools assert that moksha is the loving, eternal union or nearness of one's soul with the distinct and separate Brahman (Vishnu, Shiva or equivalent henotheism). Brahman, in these sub-schools of Hinduism is considered the highest perfection of existence, which every soul journeys towards in its own way for moksha. [104]

Schools of thought

Vedanta

The concept of Brahman, its nature and its relationship with Atman and the observed universe, is a major point of difference between the various sub-schools of the Vedanta school of Hinduism.

Advaita Vedanta

Advaita Vedanta espouses nondualism. Brahman is the sole unchanging reality, [71] there is no duality, no limited individual souls nor a separate unlimited cosmic soul, rather all souls, all of existence, across all space and time, is one and the same. [6] [81] [105] The universe and the soul inside each being is Brahman, and the universe and the soul outside each being is Brahman, according to Advaita Vedanta. Brahman is the origin and end of all things, material and spiritual. Brahman is the root source of everything that exists. He states that Brahman can neither be taught nor perceived (as an object of intellectual knowledge), but it can be learned and realized by all human beings. [21] The goal of Advaita Vedanta is to realize that one's Self ( Atman ) gets obscured by ignorance and false-identification ("Avidya"). When Avidya is removed, the Atman (Soul, Self inside a person) is realized as identical with Brahman. [74] The Brahman is not an outside, separate, dual entity, the Brahman is within each person, states Advaita Vedanta school of Hinduism. Brahman is all that is eternal, unchanging and that which truly exists. [71] This view is stated in this school in many different forms, such as "Ekam sat" ("Truth is one"), and all is Brahman.

The universe does not simply come from Brahman, it is Brahman. According to Adi Shankara, a proponent of Advaita Vedanta, the knowledge of Brahman that shruti provides cannot be obtained by any other means besides self inquiry. [106]

In Advaita Vedanta, nirguna Brahman, that is the Brahman without attributes, is held to be the ultimate and sole reality. [71] [75] Consciousness is not a property of Brahman but its very nature. In this respect, Advaita Vedanta differs from other Vedanta schools. [107]

Example verses from Bhagavad-Gita include:

The offering is Brahman; the oblation is Brahman;
offered by Brahman into the fire of Brahman.
Brahman will be attained by him,
who always sees Brahman in action. – Hymn 4.24 [108] [109]

He who finds his happiness within,
His delight within,
And his light within,
This yogin attains the bliss of Brahman, becoming Brahman. – Hymn 5.24 [110]

Bhagavad Gita

Dvaita Vedanta

Brahman of Dvaita is a concept similar to God in major world religions. [19] Dvaita holds that the individual soul is dependent on God, but distinct. [19]

Dvaita propounds Tattvavada which means understanding differences between Tattvas (significant properties) of entities within the universal substrate as follows:[ citation needed ]

  1. Jîva-Îshvara-bheda — difference between the soul and Vishnu
  2. Jada-Îshvara-bheda — difference between the insentient and Vishnu
  3. Mitha-jîva-bheda — difference between any two souls
  4. Jada-jîva-bheda — difference between insentient and the soul
  5. Mitha-jada-bheda — difference between any two insentients

Achintya Bheda Abheda

The Acintya Bheda Abheda philosophy is similar to Dvaitadvaita (differential monism). In this philosophy, Brahman is not just impersonal, but also personal.[ citation needed ] That Brahman is Supreme Personality of Godhead, though on first stage of realization (by process called jnana) of Absolute Truth, He is realized as impersonal Brahman, then as personal Brahman having eternal Vaikuntha abode (also known as Brahmalokah sanatana), then as Paramatma (by process of yogameditation on Supersoul, Vishnu-God in heart)—Vishnu (Narayana, also in everyone's heart) who has many abodes known as Vishnulokas (Vaikunthalokas), and finally (Absolute Truth is realized by bhakti) as Bhagavan, Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is source of both Paramatma and Brahman (personal, impersonal, or both).[ citation needed ]

Vaishnavism

All Vaishnava schools are panentheistic and perceive the Advaita concept of identification of Atman with the impersonal Brahman as an intermediate step of self-realization, but not Mukti, or final liberation of complete God-realization through Bhakti Yoga.[ citation needed ] Gaudiya Vaishnavism, a form of Achintya Bheda Abheda philosophy, also concludes that Brahman is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. According to them, Brahman is Lord Vishnu/Krishna; the universe and all other manifestations of the Supreme are extensions of Him.[ citation needed ]

Bhakti movement

The Bhakti movement of Hinduism built its theosophy around two concepts of Brahman—Nirguna and Saguna. [111] Nirguna Brahman was the concept of the Ultimate Reality as formless, without attributes or quality. [112] Saguna Brahman, in contrast, was envisioned and developed as with form, attributes and quality. [112] The two had parallels in the ancient pantheistic unmanifest and theistic manifest traditions, respectively, and traceable to Arjuna-Krishna dialogue in the Bhagavad Gita. [111] [113] It is the same Brahman, but viewed from two perspectives, one from Nirguni knowledge-focus and other from Saguni love-focus, united as Krishna in the Gita. [113] Nirguna bhakta's poetry were Jnana-shrayi, or had roots in knowledge. [111] Saguna bhakta's poetry were Prema-shrayi, or with roots in love. [111] In Bhakti, the emphasis is reciprocal love and devotion, where the devotee loves God, and God loves the devotee. [113]

Jeaneane Fowler states that the concepts of Nirguna and Saguna Brahman, at the root of Bhakti movement theosophy, underwent more profound development with the ideas of Vedanta school of Hinduism, particularly those of Adi Shankara's Advaita Vedanta, Ramanuja's Vishishtadvaita Vedanta, and Madhvacharya's Dvaita Vedanta. [112] Two 12th-century influential treatises on bhakti were Sandilya Bhakti Sutra—a treatise resonating with Nirguna-bhakti, and Narada Bhakti Sutra—a treatise that leans towards Saguna-bhakti. [114]

Nirguna and Saguna Brahman concepts of the Bhakti movement has been a baffling one to scholars, particularly the Nirguni tradition because it offers, states David Lorenzen, "heart-felt devotion to a God without attributes, without even any definable personality". [115] Yet given the "mountains of Nirguni bhakti literature", adds Lorenzen, bhakti for Nirguna Brahman has been a part of the reality of the Hindu tradition along with the bhakti for Saguna Brahman. [115] These were two alternate ways of imagining God during the bhakti movement. [111]

Buddhist understanding of Brahman

Buddhism rejects the Upanishadic doctrine of Brahman and Atman (soul, permanent self, essence). [note 6] According to Damien Keown, "the Buddha said he could find no evidence for the existence of either the personal soul (atman) or its cosmic counterpart (brahman)". [116] The metaphysics of Buddhism rejects Brahman (ultimate being), Brahman-like essence, soul and anything metaphysically equivalent through its Anatta doctrine. [117] [118] [119]

According to Merv Fowler, some forms of Buddhism have incorporated concepts that resemble that of Brahman. [note 7] As an example, Fowler cites the early Sarvastivada school of Buddhism, which "had come to accept a very pantheistic religious philosophy, and are important because of the impetus they gave to the development of Mahayana Buddhism". [120] According to William Theodore De Bary, in the doctrines of the Yogacara school of Mahayana Buddhism, "the Body of Essence, the Ultimate Buddha, who pervaded and underlay the whole universe [...] was in fact the World Soul, the Brahman of the Upanishads, in a new form". [121] According to Fowler, some scholars have identified the Buddhist nirvana , conceived of as the Ultimate Reality, with the Hindu Brahman/atman; Fowler claims that this view "has gained little support in Buddhist circles." [122] Fowler asserts that the authors of a number of Mahayana texts took pains to differentiate their ideas from the Upanishadic doctrine of Brahman. [note 8]

Brahma as a surrogate for Brahman in Buddhist texts

The spiritual concept of Brahman is far older in the Vedic literature, and some scholars suggest deity Brahma may have emerged as a personal conception and icon with form and attributes (saguna version) of the impersonal, nirguna (without attributes), formless universal principle called Brahman. [123] In the Hindu texts, one of the earliest mention of deity Brahma along with Vishnu and Shiva is in the fifth Prapathaka (lesson) of the Maitrayaniya Upanishad, probably composed in late 1st millennium BCE, after the rise of Buddhism. [124] [125] [126]

The early Buddhists attacked the concept of Brahma, states Gananath Obeyesekere, and thereby polemically attacked the Vedic and Upanishadic concept of gender neutral, abstract metaphysical Brahman. [127] This critique of Brahma in early Buddhist texts aim at ridiculing the Vedas, but the same texts simultaneously call metta (loving-kindness, compassion) as the state of union with Brahma. The early Buddhist approach to Brahma was to reject any creator aspect, while retaining the value system in the Vedic Brahmavihara concepts, in the Buddhist value system. [127] According to Martin Wiltshire, the term "Brahma loka" in the Buddhist canon, instead of "Svarga loka", is likely a Buddhist attempt to choose and emphasize the "truth power" and knowledge focus of the Brahman concept in the Upanishads. [128] Simultaneously, by reformulating Brahman as Brahma and relegating it within its Devas and Samsara theories, early Buddhism rejected the Atman-Brahman premise of the Vedas to present of its own Dhamma doctrines (anicca, dukkha and anatta). [129]

Brahman in Sikhism

Ek onkar.svg
Om devanagari.PNG
Ik Onkar (left) is part of the Mul Mantar in Sikhism, where it means "Onkar [God, Reality] is one". [130] The Onkar of Sikhism is related to Om—also called Omkāra [131] —in Hinduism. [130] [132] The ancient texts of Hinduism state Om to be a symbolism for the Highest Reality, Brahman. [133] [134]

The metaphysical concept of Brahman, particularly as nirguni Brahman—attributeless, formless, eternal Highest Reality—is at the foundation of Sikhism. [135] This belief is observed through nirguni Bhakti by the Sikhs. [136] [137]

In Gauri, which is part of the Guru Granth Sahib, Brahman is declared as "One without a second", in Sri Rag "everything is born of Him, and is finally absorbed in Him", in Var Asa "whatever we see or hear is the manifestation of Brahman". [138] Nesbitt states that the first two words, Ik Onkar, in the twelve-word Mul Mantar at the opening of the Sikh scripture Guru Granth Sahib, has been translated in three different ways by scholars: "There is one god", "This being is one", and as "One reality is". [130]

Similar emphasis on "One without a second" for metaphysical concept of Brahman, is found in ancient texts of Hinduism, such as the Chandogya Upanishad's chapter 6.2. [139] [140] The ideas about God and Highest Reality in Sikhism share themes found in the Saguna and Nirguna concepts of Brahman in Hinduism. [135] [141]

The concept of Ultimate Reality (Brahman) is also referred in Sikhism as Nam, Sat-naam or Naam, and Ik Oankar like Hindu Om symbolizes this Reality. [142] [143]

Brahman in Jainism

Scholars contest whether the concept of Brahman is rejected or accepted in Jainism. The concept of a theistic God is rejected by Jainism, but Jiva or "Atman (soul) exists" is held to be a metaphysical truth and central to its theory of rebirths and Kevala Jnana. [144]

Bissett states that Jainism accepts the "material world" and "Atman", but rejects Brahman—the metaphysical concept of Ultimate Reality and Cosmic Principles found in the ancient texts of Hinduism. [145] Goswami, in contrast, states that the literature of Jainism has an undercurrent of monist theme, where the self who gains the knowledge of Brahman (Highest Reality, Supreme Knowledge) is identical to Brahman itself. [146] Jaini states that Jainism neither accepts nor rejects the premise of Ultimate Reality (Brahman), instead Jain ontology adopts a many sided doctrine called Anekantavada . This doctrine holds that "reality is irreducibly complex" and no human view or description can represent the Absolute Truth. [147] [148] Those who have understood and realized the Absolute Truth are the liberated ones and the Supreme Souls, with Kevala Jnana. [147]

Comparison of Brahma, Brahman, Brahmin and Brahmanas

Brahma is distinct from Brahman. [149] Brahma is a male deity, in the post-Vedic Puranic literature, [150] who creates but neither preserves nor destroys anything. He is envisioned in some Hindu texts to have emerged from the metaphysical Brahman along with Vishnu (preserver), Shiva (destroyer), all other gods, goddesses, matter and other beings. [151] In theistic schools of Hinduism where deity Brahma is described as part of its cosmology, he is a mortal like all gods and goddesses, and dissolves into the abstract immortal Brahman when the universe ends, thereafter a new cosmic cycle (kalpa) restarts again. [150] [152]

Brahman is a metaphysical concept of Hinduism referring to the ultimate unchanging reality, [149] [153] [154] that, states Doniger, is uncreated, eternal, infinite, transcendent, the cause, the foundation, the source and the goal of all existence. [151] It is envisioned as either the cause or that which transforms itself into everything that exists in the universe as well as all beings, that which existed before the present universe and time, which exists as current universe and time, and that which will absorb and exist after the present universe and time ends. [151] It is a gender neutral abstract concept. [151] [155] [156] The abstract Brahman concept is predominant in the Vedic texts, particularly the Upanishads; [157] while the deity Brahma finds minor mention in the Vedas and the Upanishads. [158] In the Puranic and the Epics literature, deity Brahma appears more often, but inconsistently. Some texts suggest that god Vishnu created Brahma (Vaishnavism), [159] others suggest god Shiva created Brahma (Shaivism), [160] yet others suggest goddess Devi created Brahma (Shaktism), [161] and these texts then go on to state that Brahma is a secondary creator of the world working respectively on their behalf. [161] [162] Further, the medieval era texts of these major theistic traditions of Hinduism assert that the saguna [note 9] Brahman is Vishnu, [164] is Shiva, [165] or is Devi [166] respectively, they are different names or aspects of the Brahman, and that the Atman (soul, self) within every living being is same or part of this ultimate, eternal Brahman. [167]

Brahmin is a varna in Hinduism specialising in theory as priests, preservers and transmitters of sacred literature across generations. [168] [169]

The Brahmanas are one of the four ancient layers of texts within the Vedas. They are primarily a digest incorporating myths, legends, the explanation of Vedic rituals and in some cases philosophy. [170] [171] They are embedded within each of the four Vedas, and form a part of the Hindu śruti literature. [172]

See also

Notes

  1. "not sublatable", [14] the final element in a dialectical process which cannot be eliminated or annihilated (German: "aufheben").
  2. It is also defined as:
  3. Saguna Brahman, with qualities
  4. Nirguna Brahman, without qualities
  5. Supreme
  6. Merv Fowler, Zen Buddhism: Beliefs and Practices (Brighton: Sussex Academic, 2005), p. 30: "Upanisadic thought is anything but consistent; nevertheless, there is a common focus on the acceptance of a totally transcendent Absolute, a trend which arose in the Vedic period. This indescribable Absolute is called Brahman [...] The true Self and Brahman are one and the same. Known as the Brahman-Atman synthesis, this theory, which is central to Upanisadic thought, is the cornerstone of Indian philosophy. The Brahman-Atman synthesis, which posits the theory of a permanent, unchanging self, was anathema to Buddhists, and it was as a reaction to the synthesis that Buddhism first drew breath. Merv Fowler p. 47: "For the Upanisadic sages, the real is the Self, is Atman, is Brahman. [...] To the Buddhist, however, any talk of an Atman or permanent, unchanging Self, the very kernel of Upanisadic thought, is anathema, a false notion of manifest proportion."
  7. Merv Fowler, Buddhism: Beliefs and Practices (Brighton: Sussex Academic, 1999), p. 34: "It was inevitable that the non-theistic philosophy of orthodox Buddhism should court the older Hindu practices and, in particular, infuse into its philosophy the belief in a totally transcendent Absolute of the nature of Brahman."
  8. Merv Fowler, Buddhism: Beliefs and Practices (Brighton: Sussex Academic, 1999), p. 82: "The original writers of these Mahayana texts were not at all pleased that their writings were seen to contain the Brahman of the Upanisads in a new form. The authors of the Lankavatara strenuously denied that the womb of Tathagatahood, [...] was in any way equatable with the 'eternal self', the Brahmanical atman of Upanisadic thought. Similarly, the claim in the Nirvana Sutra that the Buddha regarded Buddhahood as a 'great atman' caused the Yogacarins considerable distress."
  9. representation with face and attributes) [163]

Related Research Articles

The Upanishads, a part of the Vedas, are ancient Sanskrit texts that contain some of the central philosophical concepts and ideas of Hinduism, some of which are shared with religious traditions like Buddhism and Jainism. Among the most important literature in the history of Indian religions and culture, the Upanishads played an important role in the development of spiritual ideas in ancient India, marking a transition from Vedic ritualism to new ideas and institutions. Of all Vedic literature, the Upanishads alone are widely known, and their central ideas are at the spiritual core of Hinduism.

Ātman is a Sanskrit word that means inner self, spirit or soul. In Hindu philosophy, especially in the Vedanta school of Hinduism, Ātman is the first principle, the true self of an individual beyond identification with phenomena, the essence of an individual. In order to attain liberation (moksha), a human being must acquire self-knowledge, which is to realize that one's true self (Ātman) is identical with the transcendent self Brahman.

Vedanta or Uttara Mīmāṃsā is the most prominent of the six (āstika) schools of Hindu philosophy. Literally meaning "end of the Vedas", Vedanta reflects ideas that emerged from the speculations and philosophies contained in the Upanishads, specifically, knowledge and liberation. Vedanta contains many sub-traditions, ranging from dualism to non-dualism, all of which developed on the basis of a common textual connection called the Prasthanatrayi - the Upanishads, the Brahma Sutras and the Bhagavad Gita.

Yajnavalkya legendary sage of Vedic India

Yajnavalkya was a Hindu Vedic sage. He is mentioned in the Upanishads, and likely lived in the Videha kingdom of northern Bihar approximately between the 8th century BCE, and the 7th century BCE. Yajnavalkya is considered one of the earliest philosophers in recorded history. Yajnavalkya proposes and debates metaphysical questions about the nature of existence and impermanence, and expounds the epistemic doctrine of neti neti to discover the universal Self and Ātman. His ideas for renunciation of worldly attachments have been important to Hindu sannyasa traditions.

Advaita Vedanta School of Hindu philosophy, a classic path to spiritual realization

Advaita Vedanta, also known as Mayavāda, is a school of Hindu philosophy, and originally known as Puruṣavāda, is a classic system of spiritual realization in Hindu tradition. The term Advaita refers to its idea that the true self, Atman, is the same as the highest metaphysical Reality (Brahman). The followers of this school are known as Advaita Vedantins, or just Advaitins or Mayavadins, and they seek spiritual liberation through acquiring vidyā, meaning knowledge, of one's true identity as Atman, and the identity of Atman and Brahman.

Hindu philosophy various systems of thought in Hinduism

Hindu philosophy refers to philosophies, world views and teachings that emerged in ancient India. These include six systems (ṣaḍdarśana) – Sankhya, Yoga, Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Mimamsa and Vedanta. These are also called the Astika (orthodox) philosophical traditions and are those that accept the Vedas as an authoritative, important source of knowledge. Ancient and medieval India was also the source of philosophies that share philosophical concepts but rejected the Vedas, and these have been called nāstika Indian philosophies. Nāstika Indian philosophies include Buddhism, Jainism, Cārvāka, Ājīvika, and others.

The Brahma sūtras is a Sanskrit text, attributed to Badarayana, estimated to have been completed in its surviving form in approx. 400-450 CE. The text systematizes and summarizes the philosophical and spiritual ideas in the Upanishads. It is one of the foundational texts of the Vedānta school of Hindu philosophy.

Satchitananda or Sacchidānanda representing "existence, consciousness, and bliss" or "truth, consciousness, bliss", is an epithet and description for the subjective experience of the ultimate, unchanging reality in Hinduism called Brahman.

<i>Brihadaranyaka Upanishad</i> One of the oldest Upanishads of Hinduism

The Brihadaranyaka Upanishad is one of the Principal Upanishads and one of the first Upanishadic scriptures of Hinduism. A key scripture to various schools of Hinduism, the Brihadaranyaka Upanisad is tenth in the Muktikā or "canon of 108 Upanishads".

Smarta tradition a tradition in Hinduism linked to Advaita Vedanta

Smarta tradition (स्मार्त) is a movement in Hinduism that developed during its classical period around the beginning of the Common Era. It reflects a Hindu synthesis of four philosophical strands: Mimamsa, Advaita, Yoga, and theism. The Smarta tradition rejects theistic sectarianism, and it is notable for the domestic worship of five shrines with five deities, all treated as equal – Shiva, Vishnu, Surya, Ganesha and Devi (Shakti). The Smarta tradition contrasted with the older Shrauta tradition, which was based on elaborate rituals and rites. There has been considerable overlap in the ideas and practices of the Smarta tradition with other significant historic movements within Hinduism, namely Shaivism, Brahmanism, Vaishnavism, and Shaktism.

<i>Shvetashvatara Upanishad</i> One of the ancient Sanskrit scriptures of Hinduism

The Shvetashvatara Upanishad is an ancient Sanskrit text embedded in the Yajurveda. It is listed as number 14 in the Muktika canon of 108 Upanishads. The Upanishad contains 113 mantras or verses in six chapters.

<i>Katha Upanishad</i> One of the ancient Sanskrit scriptures of Hinduism

The Katha Upanishad is one of the mukhya (primary) Upanishads, embedded in the last short eight sections of the Kaṭha school of the Krishna Yajurveda. It is also known as Kāṭhaka Upanishad, and is listed as number 3 in the Muktika canon of 108 Upanishads.

Brahmā (Buddhism) deva and heavenly king in Buddhism; lord of the heavenly realm Brahmaloka; not regarded as a creator deity (unlike the deity of the same name in Hinduism)

Brahmā is a leading god (deva) and heavenly king in Buddhism. He was adopted from other Indian religions such as Hinduism that considered him a protector of teachings (dharmapala), and he is never depicted in early Buddhist texts as a creator god. In Buddhist tradition, it was the deity Brahma Sahampati who appeared before the Buddha and urged him to teach, once the Buddha attained enlightenment but was unsure if he should teach his insights to anyone.

The concept of God in Hinduism varies in its diverse traditions. Hinduism spans a wide range of beliefs such as henotheism, monotheism, polytheism, panentheism, pantheism, pandeism, monism, atheism and nontheism.

Maitreyi was an Indian philosopher who lived during the later Vedic period in ancient India. She is mentioned in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad she is estimated to have lived around the 8th century BCE. In the Hindu epic Mahabharata and the Gṛhyasūtras, however, Maitreyi is described as an Advaita philosopher who never married. In ancient Sanskrit literature, she is known as a brahmavadini.

Para Brahman (Sanskrit:परब्रह्मन्) is the "Highest Brahman" that which is beyond all descriptions and conceptualisations. It is described in Hindu texts as the formless spirit (soul) that eternally pervades everything, everywhere in the universe and whatever is beyond.

Aruni, also referred to as Uddalaka or Uddalaka Aruni, is a revered Vedic sage of Hinduism. He is mentioned in many Vedic era Sanskrit texts, and his philosophical teachings are among the center piece in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad and Chandogya Upanishad, two of the oldest Upanishadic scriptures. A famed Vedic teacher, Aruni lived a few centuries before the Buddha, during the times of 23rd Jina Parshvanatha, and attracted students from far regions of the Indian subcontinent; some of his students such as Yajnavalkya are also highly revered in the Hindu traditions. Both Aruni and Yajnavalkya are among the most frequently mentioned Upanishadic teachers in Hinduism.

<i>Paingala Upanishad</i>

The Paingala Upanishad is an early medieval era Sanskrit text and is one of the minor Upanishads of Hinduism. It is one of the 22 Samanya (general) Upanishads, and its manuscripts survive in modern times in two versions. The shorter version of the manuscript is found attached to the Atharvaveda, while the longer version is attached to the Shukla Yajurveda. It presents a syncretic view of Samkhya and Vedanta schools of Hindu philosophy.

<i>Mahavakya Upanishad</i> Hindu text on Yoga

The Mahavakya Upanishad is a Sanskrit text and one of the minor Upanishads of Hinduism. It is attached to the Atharvaveda, and is classified as one of the 20 Yoga Upanishads. The text describes the nature of Atman and Brahman, then asserts that they are identical and liberation is the state of fully understanding this identity.

The Shaiva Upanishads are minor Upanishads of Hinduism, specific to Shiva theology (Shaivism). There are 14 Shaiva Upanishads in the Muktika anthology of 108 Upanishads. They, along with other minor Upanishads, are generally classified separate from the thirteen ancient Principal Upanishads rooted in the Vedic tradition.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Lochtefeld, James G. (2002). The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism. 1. The Rosen Publishing Group. p. 122. ISBN   978-0823931798.
  2. 1 2 P. T. Raju (2006), Idealistic Thought of India, Routledge, ISBN   978-1406732627, page 426 and Conclusion chapter part XII
  3. 1 2 Fowler 2002, pp. 49–55 (in Upanishads), 318–319 (in Vishistadvaita), 246–248 and 252–255 (in Advaita), 342–343 (in Dvaita), 175–176 (in Samkhya-Yoga).
  4. Mariasusai Dhavamony (2002), Hindu-Christian Dialogue: Theological Soundings and Perspectives, Rodopi Press, ISBN   978-9042015104, pages 43–44
  5. 1 2 For dualism school of Hinduism, see: Francis X. Clooney (2010), Hindu God, Christian God: How Reason Helps Break Down the Boundaries between Religions, Oxford University Press, ISBN   978-0199738724, pages 51–58, 111–115;
    For monist school of Hinduism, see: B. Martinez-Bedard (2006), Types of Causes in Aristotle and Sankara, Thesis – Department of Religious Studies (Advisors: Kathryn McClymond and Sandra Dwyer), Georgia State University, pages 18–35
  6. 1 2 3 Brodd, Jeffrey (2009). World Religions: A Voyage of Discovery (3rd ed.). Saint Mary's Press. pp. 43–47. ISBN   978-0884899976.
  7. Fowler 2002, pp. 50–53.
  8. Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120814684, page 91
  9. 1 2 3 Stephen Philips (1998), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Brahman to Derrida (Editor; Edward Craig), Routledge, ISBN   978-0415187077, pages 1–4
  10. 1 2 Goodman, Hananya (1994). Between Jerusalem and Benares: Comparative Studies in Judaism and Hinduism. State University of New York Press. p. 121. ISBN   978-0791417164.
  11. Raju 1992, p. 228.
  12. Eliot Deutsch (1980), Advaita Vedanta : A Philosophical Reconstruction, University of Hawaii Press, ISBN   978-0824802714, Chapter 1
  13. Fowler 2002, pp. 53–55.
  14. 1 2 Potter 2008, pp. 6–7.
  15. Brodd, Jeffrey (2003). World Religions. Winona, Minnesota: Saint Mary's Press. ISBN   978-0-88489-725-5.
  16. John Bowker (ed.)(2012), The Oxford Dictionary of World Religions, Oxford University Press.
  17. Fowler 2002, pp. 49–53.
  18. Klaus K. Klostermaier (2007), A Survey of Hinduism, Third Edition, State University of New York Press, ISBN   978-0791470824, Chapter 12: Atman and Brahman – Self and All
  19. 1 2 3 4 Michael Myers (2000), Brahman: A Comparative Theology, Routledge, ISBN   978-0700712571, pages 124–127
  20. Thomas Padiyath (2014), The Metaphysics of Becoming, De Gruyter, ISBN   978-3110342550, pages 155–157
  21. 1 2 Arvind Sharma (2007), Advaita Vedānta: An Introduction, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120820272, pages 19–40, 53–58, 79–86
  22. John E. Welshons (2009), One Soul, One Love, One Heart, New World Library, ISBN   978-1577315889, pages 17–18
  23. Puligandla 1997, p. 222.
  24. Sinari 2000, p. 384.
  25. 1 2 Not Masculine or Feminine (see Grammatical gender).
  26. 1 2 Jan Gonda (1962), Some Notes on the Study of Ancient-Indian Religious Terminology, History of Religions, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Winter, 1962), pages 268–269
  27. 1 2 Barbara Holdrege (1995), Veda and Torah: Transcending the Textuality of Scripture, State University of New York Press, ISBN   978-0791416402, page 29
  28. 1 2 3 4 Maurice Bloomfield, A Vedic Concordance, Harvard University Press, pages 656-662
  29. Original: वयमग्ने अर्वता वा सुवीर्यं ब्रह्मणा वा चितयेमा जनाँ अति । अस्माकं द्युम्नमधि पञ्च कृष्टिषूच्चा स्वर्ण शुशुचीत दुष्टरम् ॥१०॥
    Source: ऋग्वेद: सूक्तं २.२ Wikisource
  30. Original: स तु श्रुधीन्द्र नूतनस्य ब्रह्मण्यतो वीर कारुधायः । त्वं ह्यापिः प्रदिवि पितॄणां शश्वद्बभूथ सुहव एष्टौ ॥८॥
    ऋग्वेद: सूक्तं ६.२१ Wikisource
  31. Original: ब्रह्मणस्पतिरेता सं कर्मार इवाधमत् । देवानां पूर्व्ये युगेऽसतः सदजायत ॥२॥
    ऋग्वेद: सूक्तं १०.७२ Wikisource
  32. 1 2 Jan Gonda (1962), Some Notes on the Study of Ancient-Indian Religious Terminology, History of Religions, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Winter, 1962), pages 269–271. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1062054
  33. Jan Gonda (1962), Some Notes on the Study of Ancient-Indian Religious Terminology, History of Religions, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Winter, 1962), pages 271–272. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1062054
  34. See Rigveda Chapter 1.164;
    Karl Potter and Harold Coward, The Philosophy of the Grammarians, Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies: Volume 5, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, ISBN   978-8120804265, pages 34–35
  35. Barbara Holdrege (1995), Veda and Torah: Transcending the Textuality of Scripture, State University of New York Press, ISBN   978-0791416402, page 24
  36. 1 2 Gavin Flood (1996), An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press, ISBN   978-0521438780, pages 84–85
  37. Lindsay Jones (2005), Encyclopedia of religion, Volume 13, Macmillan Reference, ISBN   978-0028657332, page 8894, Quote: "In Hindu iconography the swan personifies Brahman-Atman, the transcendent yet immanent ground of being, the Self."
  38. Denise Cush (2007), Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Routledge, ISBN   978-0415556231, page 697
  39. R. Prasad and P. D. Chattopadhyaya (2008), A Conceptual-analytic Study of Classical Indian Philosophy of Morals, Concept, ISBN   978-8180695445, page 56
  40. 1 2 Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120814677, pages 243, 325–344, 363, 581
  41. Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120814677, pages 358, 371
  42. Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120814677, pages 305, 476
  43. Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120814677, pages 110, 315–316, 495, 838–851
  44. Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120814677, pages 211, 741–742
  45. Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120814677, pages 308–311, 497–499
  46. Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120814677, pages 181, 237, 444, 506–544, 570–571, 707, 847–850
  47. 1 2 Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120814677, pages 52, 110, 425, 454, 585–586, 838–851
  48. Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120814677, pages 173–174, 188–198, 308–317, 322–324, 367, 447, 496, 629–637, 658, 707–708
  49. Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120814677, pages 600, 619–620, 647, 777
  50. Radhakrishnan, S., The Principal Upanisads, HarperCollins India, 1994, page 77
  51. Jones, Constance (2007). Encyclopedia of Hinduism. New York: Infobase Publishing. p. 270. ISBN   978-0816073368.
  52. Sanskrit and English Translation: S. Madhavananda, Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 1.4.10, Brihadaranyaka Upanishad – Shankara Bhashya, page 145
  53. Sanskrit and English Translation: S. Madhavananda, Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 4.4.5, Brihadaranyaka Upanishad – Shankara Bhashya, pages 711–712
  54. Sanskrit: छान्दोग्योपनिषद् १.१ ॥तृतीयॊऽध्यायः॥ Wikisource
    English Translation:Max Muller, Chandogya Upanishad 3.14.1 Oxford University Press, page 48;
    Max Muller, The Upanisads at Google Books, Routledge, pages xviii–xix
  55. Sanskrit: छान्दोग्योपनिषद् १.२ ॥षष्ठोऽध्यायः॥ Wikisource
    English Translation:Max Muller, Chandogya Upanishad 6.2.1 Oxford University Press, page 93;
    Max Muller, The Upanisads at Google Books, Routledge, pages xviii–xix
  56. Sanskrit: छान्दोग्योपनिषद् १.२ ॥षष्ठोऽध्यायः॥ Wikisource
    English Translation:Robert Hume, Chandogya Upanishad 6.8, The Thirteen Principal Upanishads, Oxford University Press, pages 246–250
  57. A. S. Gupta, The Meanings of "That Thou Art", Philosophy East and West, Vol. 12, No. 2, pages 125–134
  58. Sanskrit: ऐतरेयोपनिषद् Wikisource
    English Translation:Max Muller, Aitareya Upanishad 3.3.7, also known as Aitareya Aranyaka 2.6.1.7 Oxford University Press, page 246
  59. 1 2 3 4 Robert Hume, Chandogya Upanishad 3.14.1 – 3.14.4, The Thirteen Principal Upanishads, Oxford University Press, pages 209–210
  60. Chandogya Upanishad with Shankara Bhashya Ganganath Jha (Translator), pages 150–157
  61. For modern era cites:
    • Anthony Warder (2009), A Course in Indian Philosophy, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120812444, pages 25–28;
    • D. D. Meyer (2012), Consciousness, Theatre, Literature and the Arts, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, ISBN   978-1443834919, page 250;
    • Joel Brereton (1995), Eastern Canons: Approaches to the Asian Classics (Editors: William Theodore De Bary, Irene Bloom), Columbia University Press, ISBN   978-0231070058, page 130;
    • S. Radhakrishnan (1914), "The Vedanta philosophy and the Doctrine of Maya", International Journal of Ethics, Vol. 24, No. 4, pages 431–451
  62. 1 2 3 Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120814684, pages 110–111 with preface and footnotes
  63. 1 2 Max Muller, Chandogya Upanishad 3.13.7, The Upanishads, Part I, Oxford University Press, page 48 with footnotes
  64. Edward Craig (1998), Metaphysics, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ISBN   978-0415073103, Accessed (13 June 2015)
  65. 1 2 3 4 Archibald Edward Gough (2001), The Philosophy of the Upanishads and Ancient Indian Metaphysics, Routledge, ISBN   978-0415245227, pages 47–48
  66. Roy W. Perrett (Editor, 2000), Indian Philosophy: Metaphysics, Volume 3, Taylor & Francis, ISBN   978-0815336082, page xvii;
    K. K. Chakrabarti (1999), Classical Indian Philosophy of Mind: The Nyaya Dualist Tradition, State University of New York Press, ISBN   978-0791441718 pages 279–292
  67. John C. Plott et al (2000), Global History of Philosophy: The Axial Age, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120801585, pages 60-62
  68. Julius Lipner (2004), The Hindu World (Editors: S. Mittal and G. Thursby), Routledge, ISBN   0415215277, pages 22–23
  69. Laurie Patton (2004), The Hindu World (Editors: S. Mittal and G. Thursby), Routledge, ISBN   0415215277, pages 45–50
  70. J. D. Fowler (1996), Hinduism: Beliefs and Practices, Sussex University Press, ISBN   978-1898723608, pages 135–137
  71. 1 2 3 4 AC Das (1952), Brahman and Māyā in Advaita Metaphysics, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 2, No. 2, pages 144–154
  72. William Indich (2000), Consciousness in Advaita Vedanta, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120812512, page 5
  73. Paul Hacker (1978), Eigentumlichkeiten dr Lehre und Terminologie Sankara: Avidya, Namarupa, Maya, Isvara, in Kleine Schriften (Editor: L. Schmithausen), Franz Steiner Verlag, Weisbaden, pages 101–109 (in German), also pages 69–99;
    Advaita Vedanta - A Bird's Eye View, Topic III: Philosophy of Advaita Vedanta, D. Krishna Ayyar (2011)
  74. 1 2 Rambachan, Anantanand (2001). "Heirarchies in the Nature of God? Questioning the "Saguna-Nirguna" Distinction in Advaita Vedanta". Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies. 14 (7): 1–6. doi:10.7825/2164-6279.1250.
  75. 1 2 3 William Wainwright (2012), Concepts of God, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, (Accessed on: 13 June 2015)
  76. that is things, beings or truths that are presumed to exist for its philosophical theory to be true, and what is the nature of that which so exists?; see: Edward Craig (1998), Ontology, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ISBN   978-0415073103
  77. Edward Craig (1998), Ontology, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ISBN   978-0415073103, Accessed (13 June 2015)
  78. Stephen H. Phillips (2001), Could There Be Mystical Evidence for a Nondual Brahman? A Causal Objection, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 51, No. 4, pages 492–506
  79. K. N. Jayatilleke (2010), Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge, ISBN   978-8120806191, pages 246–249, from note 385 onwards;
    Steven Collins (1994), Religion and Practical Reason (Editors: Frank Reynolds, David Tracy), State Univ of New York Press, ISBN   978-0791422175, page 64; Quote: "Central to Buddhist soteriology is the doctrine of not-self (Pali: anattā, Sanskrit: anātman, the opposed doctrine of ātman is central to Brahmanical thought). Put very briefly, this is the [Buddhist] doctrine that human beings have no soul, no self, no unchanging essence.";
    Edward Roer (Translator), Shankara's Introduction , p. 2, at Google Books, pages 2–4
    Katie Javanaud (2013), Is The Buddhist 'No-Self' Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana?, Philosophy Now
    John C. Plott et al (2000), Global History of Philosophy: The Axial Age, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120801585, page 63, Quote: "The Buddhist schools reject any Ātman concept. As we have already observed, this is the basic and ineradicable distinction between Hinduism and Buddhism".
  80. M. Prabhakar (2012), Review: An Introduction to Indian Philosophy, Philosophy in Review, 32(3), pages 158–160
  81. 1 2 3 Barbara Holdrege (2004), The Hindu World (Editors: S. Mittal and G. Thursby), Routledge, ISBN   0415215277, pages 241–242
  82. Anantanand Rambachan (2014), A Hindu Theology of Liberation: Not-Two Is Not One, State University of New York Press, ISBN   978-1438454559, pages 131–142
  83. Ian Whicher (1999), The Integrity of the Yoga Darsana: A Reconsideration of Classical Yoga, State University of New York Press, ISBN   978-0791438152, pages 298–300;
    Mike McNamee and William J. Morgan (2015), Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Sport, Routledge, ISBN   978-0415829809, pages 135–136, Quote: "As a dualistic philosophy largely congruent with Samkhya's metaphysics, Yoga seeks liberation through the realization that Atman equals Brahman; it involves a cosmogonic dualism: purusha an absolute consciousness, and prakriti original and primeval matter."
  84. Francis Clooney and Tony Stewart (2004), The Hindu World (Editors: S. Mittal and G. Thursby), Routledge, ISBN   0415215277, pages 166–167
  85. Randy Kloetzli and Alf Hiltebeitel (2004), The Hindu World (Editors: S. Mittal and G. Thursby), Routledge, ISBN   0415215277, page 554
  86. Michael Myers (2000), Brahman: A Comparative Theology, Routledge, ISBN   978-0700712571, pages 30–31
  87. R. Prasad and P. D. Chattopadhyaya (2008), A Conceptual-analytic Study of Classical Indian Philosophy of Morals, Concept, ISBN   978-8180695445, pages 56–59
  88. G. C. Pande (1990), Foundations of Indian Culture, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120807105, pages 49–50
  89. Michael W. Myers (1998), Śaṅkarācārya and Ānanda, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 48, No. 4, pages 553–567
  90. Robert S. Hartman (2002), The Knowledge of Good: Critique of Axiological Reason, Rodopi, ISBN   978-9042012202, page 225
  91. T. M. P. Mahadevan (1954), The Metaphysics of Śaṁkara, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 3, No. 4, pages 359–363
  92. Arvind Sharma (1999), The Puruṣārthas: An Axiological Exploration of Hinduism, The Journal of Religious Ethics, Vol. 27, No. 2, pages 223–256
  93. J. L. Shaw (2011), Freedom: East and West, SOPHIA, Vol 50, Springer Science, pages 481–497
  94. Katherine L Tietge (1997), Ontology and Genuine Moral Action: Jñaña (Intuitive Perception) Ethics and Karma-Yoga in Sankara's Advaita Vedanta and Schopenhauer's On the Basis of Morality, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Philosophy, Southern Illinois University (US), Archive Link
  95. 1 2 3 4 Nancy Bauer (1987), Advaita Vedānta and Contemporary Western Ethics, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 37, No. 1, pages 36–50
  96. Arvind Sharma (2000), Classical Hindu Thought: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, ISBN   978-0195644418, pages 57–61
  97. 1 2 N. A. Nikam (1952), A Note on the Individual and His Status in Indian Thought, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 2, No. 3, pages 254–258
  98. "The Svetasvatara Upanishad, An Introduction". Hinduwebsite.com. Retrieved 26 January 2019.
  99. [ permanent dead link ]
  100. "English translation of Aitareya Upanishad" (PDF). Consciouslivingfoundation.org. Retrieved 26 January 2019.
  101. T.N. Sethumadhavan. "Aitareya Upanishad : Transliterated Sanskrit Text Free Translation & Brief Explanation" (PDF). Esamskriti.com. Retrieved 26 January 2019.
  102. Anantanand Rambachan (1994), The limits of scripture: Vivekananda's reinterpretation of the Vedas, University of Hawaii Press, pages 124–125
  103. Karl Potter (2008), The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies: Advaita Vedānta Up to Śaṃkara and His Pupils, Volume 3, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, pp. 210–215
  104. Betty Stafford (2010) "Dvaita, Advaita, And Viśiṣṭadvaita: Contrasting Views Of Mokṣa", Asian Philosophy, pages 215–224
  105. Rosen Dalal (2014), Hinduism: An Alphabetical Guide, Penguin, ISBN   978-8184752779, see article on Brahman
  106. Anantanand Rambachan (1994), The limits of scripture: Vivekananda's reinterpretation of the Vedas. University of Hawaii Press, pages 125, 124
  107. [Sangeetha Menon (2007), Advaita Vedānta], Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  108. Christopher Key Chapple (Editor) and Winthrop Sargeant (Translator), The Bhagavad Gita: Twenty-fifth–Anniversary Edition, State University of New York Press, ISBN   978-1438428420, page 224
  109. Jeaneane D. Fowler (2012), The Bhagavad Gita, Sussex Academic Press, ISBN   978-1845193461, page 83
  110. Christopher Key Chapple (Editor) and Winthrop Sargeant (Translator), The Bhagavad Gita: Twenty-fifth–Anniversary Edition, State University of New York Press, ISBN   978-1438428420, page 266
  111. 1 2 3 4 5 Karen Pechilis Prentiss (2014), The Embodiment of Bhakti, Oxford University Press, ISBN   978-0195351903, page 21
  112. 1 2 3 Jeaneane D. Fowler (2012), The Bhagavad Gita, Sussex Academic Press, ISBN   978-1845193461, pages xxvii–xxxiv
  113. 1 2 3 Jeaneane D. Fowler (2012), The Bhagavad Gita, Sussex Academic Press, ISBN   978-1845193461, pages 207–211
  114. Jessica Frazier and Gavin Flood (2011), The Continuum Companion to Hindu Studies, Bloomsbury Academic, ISBN   978-0826499660, pages 113–115
  115. 1 2 David Lorenzen (1996), Praises to a Formless God: Nirguni Texts from North India, State University of New York Press, ISBN   978-0791428054, page 2
  116. Damien Keown, Buddhism (NY: Sterling, 2009), p. 70
  117. David Webster (2004). The Philosophy of Desire in the Buddhist Pali Canon. Routledge. pp. 194–195, 93, 147. ISBN   978-0-203-01057-0.
  118. Richard Francis Gombrich; Cristina Anna Scherrer-Schaub (2008). Buddhist Studies. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 192–193. ISBN   978-81-208-3248-0.
  119. Mark Juergensmeyer; Wade Clark Roof (2011). Encyclopedia of Global Religion. SAGE Publications. pp. 272–273. ISBN   978-1-4522-6656-5.
  120. Merv Fowler, Buddhism: Beliefs and Practices (Brighton: Sussex Academic, 1999), p. 34
  121. William Theodore De Bary, cited in Merv Fowler, Buddhism: Beliefs and Practices (Brighton: Sussex Academic, 1999), p. 98
  122. Merv Fowler, Buddhism: Beliefs and Practices (Brighton: Sussex Academic, 1999), p. 81
  123. Bruce Sullivan (1999), Seer of the Fifth Veda, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120816763, pages 82–83
  124. Hume, Robert Ernest (1921), The Thirteen Principal Upanishads, Oxford University Press, pp. 422–424
  125. K. N. Jayatilleke (1998). Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 68, 374. ISBN   978-81-208-0619-1., Quote: "We may conclude from the above that the rise of Buddhism is not far removed in time from, though it is prior to, the Maitri Upanishad".
  126. Jan Gonda (1968), The Hindu Trinity, Anthropos, Vol. 63, pages 215–219
  127. 1 2 Gananath Obeyesekere (2006). Karma and Rebirth: A Cross Cultural Study. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 177–179. ISBN   978-81-208-2609-0.
  128. Martin G. Wiltshire (1990). Ascetic Figures Before and in Early Buddhism: The Emergence of Gautama as the Buddha. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 248–249, 253–255. ISBN   978-3-11-009896-9.
  129. Martin G. Wiltshire (1990). Ascetic Figures Before and in Early Buddhism: The Emergence of Gautama as the Buddha. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 256–265. ISBN   978-3-11-009896-9.
  130. 1 2 3 Eleanor Nesbitt (2005), Sikhism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, ISBN   978-0192806017, Chapter 4
  131. Jean Holm and John Bowker, Worship, Bloomsbury, ISBN, page 67
  132. Wendy Doniger (2000), Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions, Merriam Webster, ISBN   978-0877790440, page 500
  133. Rangaswami Sudhakshina (2012), Roots of Vendanta, Penguin, ISBN   978-0143064459, page 405
  134. David Leeming (2005), The Oxford Companion to World Mythology, Oxford University Press, ISBN   978-0195156690, page 54
  135. 1 2 S. S. Kohli (1993), The Sikh and Sikhism, Atlantic, ISBN   81-71563368, page 39
  136. Hardip Syan (2014), in The Oxford Handbook of Sikh Studies (Editors: Pashaura Singh, Louis E. Fenech), Oxford University Press, ISBN   978-0199699308, page 178
  137. A. Mandair (2011), Time and religion-making in modern Sikhism, in Time, History and the Religious Imaginary in South Asia (Editor: Anne Murphy), Routledge, ISBN   978-0415595971, pages 188–190
  138. S. S. Kohli (1993), The Sikh and Sikhism, Atlantic, ISBN   81-71563368, page 38
  139. Max Muller, Chandogya Upanishad 6.2.1 Oxford University Press, pages 93–94
  140. Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120814684, pages 156–157, 162–163
  141. N. Mandair (2009), Postcolonial Philosophy of Religion (Editor: Purushottama Bilimoria, Andrew B. Irvine), Springer, ISBN   978-9400791770, pages 145–146
  142. William Owen Cole and Piara Singh Sambhi (1998), The Sikhs: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices, 2nd edition, Sussex Academic Press, ISBN   978-1898723134, pages 70–71
  143. H. S. Singha (2009), Sikh Studies, Vol. 7, Hemkunt Press, ISBN   978-8170102458, page 47
  144. Ray Billington (1997), Understanding Eastern Philosophy, Routledge, ISBN   978-0415129657, page 46
  145. James Bissett, Cultural and Religious Heritage of India, Volume 2: Jainism (Editors: Sharma and Sharma), Mittal, ISBN   81-70999553, page 81
  146. C. Caillat and N. Balbir (2008), Jaina Studies, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-8120832473, pages ix–x
  147. 1 2 P. Jaini (1998), The Jaina Path of Purification, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   81-208-1578-5, pages 90–93
  148. J. Koller (2004), "Why is Anekāntavāda important?", (Editor: Tara Sethia, Ahimsā, Anekānta, and Jainism), Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   81-208-2036-3, pages 400–407
  149. 1 2 Helen K. Bond; Seth D. Kunin; Francesca Murphy (2003). Religious Studies and Theology: An Introduction. New York University Press. p. 231. ISBN   978-0-8147-9914-7.
  150. 1 2 R. M. Matthijs Cornelissen (2011). Foundations of Indian Psychology Volume 2: Practical Applications. Pearson. p. 40. ISBN   978-81-317-3085-0.
  151. 1 2 3 4 Wendy Denier (1999). Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions. Merriam-Webster. p. 437. ISBN   978-0-87779-044-0.
  152. Jeaneane D. Fowler (2002). Perspectives of Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Hinduism. Sussex Academic Press. p. 330. ISBN   978-1-898723-93-6.
  153. William Sweet (2006). Approaches to Metaphysics. Springer. pp. 145–147. ISBN   978-1-4020-2182-4.
  154. H. James Birx (2005). Encyclopedia of Anthropology. SAGE Publications. p. 1279. ISBN   978-1-4522-6536-0.
  155. J. L. Brockington (1998). The Sanskrit Epics. BRILL Academic. p. 256. ISBN   90-04-10260-4.
  156. Denise Cush; Catherine Robinson; Michael York (2012). Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Routledge. pp. 114–115. ISBN   978-1-135-18979-2.
  157. Edward Craig (1998). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Brahman to Derrida. Routledge. pp. 1–4. ISBN   978-0-415-18707-7.
  158. Julius Lipner (1994). Hindus: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices. Routledge. pp. 43–44. ISBN   978-0-415-05181-1.
  159. S. M. Srinivasa Chari (1994). Vaiṣṇavism: Its Philosophy, Theology, and Religious Discipline. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 147. ISBN   978-81-208-1098-3.
  160. Wendy Doniger O'Flaherty (1981). Siva: The Erotic Ascetic. Oxford University Press. p. 125. ISBN   978-0-19-972793-3.
  161. 1 2 David Kinsley (1988). Hindu Goddesses: Visions of the Divine Feminine in the Hindu Religious Tradition. University of California Press. p. 137. ISBN   978-0-520-90883-3.
  162. Stella Kramrisch (1992). The Presence of Siva. Princeton University Press. pp. 205–206. ISBN   0-691-01930-4.
  163. Arvind Sharma (2000). Classical Hindu Thought: An Introduction. Oxford University Press. p. 4. ISBN   978-0-19-564441-8.
  164. Mark Juergensmeyer; Wade Clark Roof (2011). Encyclopedia of Global Religion. SAGE Publications. p. 1335. ISBN   978-1-4522-6656-5.
  165. Stella Kramrisch (1992). The Presence of Siva. Princeton University Press. p. 171. ISBN   0-691-01930-4.
  166. David Kinsley (1988). Hindu Goddesses: Visions of the Divine Feminine in the Hindu Religious Tradition. University of California Press. p. 136. ISBN   978-0-520-90883-3.
  167. William K. Mahony (1998). The Artful Universe: An Introduction to the Vedic Religious Imagination. State University of New York Press. pp. 13–14, 187. ISBN   978-0-7914-3579-3.
  168. Doniger, Wendy (1999). Merriam-Webster's encyclopedia of world religions. Springfield, Massachusetts, US: Merriam-Webster. p. 186. ISBN   978-0-87779-044-0.
  169. James Lochtefeld (2002), Brahmin, The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Vol. 1: A–M, Rosen Publishing, ISBN   978-0823931798, page 125
  170. Brahmana Encyclopædia Britannica (2013)
  171. Klaus Klostermaier (1994), A Survey of Hinduism, Second Edition, State University of New York Press, ISBN   978-0791421093, pages 67–69
  172. "Brahmana". Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary

Bibliography

  • Fowler, Jeaneane D. (2002). Perspectives of Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Hinduism. Sussex Academic Press. ISBN   978-1-898723-93-6.
  • Klostermaier, Klaus K. (2010). "Chapter 12". A Survey of Hinduism: Third Edition. State University of New York Press. ISBN   978-0-7914-8011-3.
  • Michaels, Axel (2004). Hinduism. Past and present. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Potter, Karl H. (2008), The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies: Advaita Vedānta Up to Śaṃkara and His Pupils, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited
  • Puligandla, Ramakrishna (1997), Fundamentals of Indian Philosophy, New Delhi: D. K. Printworld (P) Ltd.
  • Raju, P. T. (1992), The Philosophical Traditions of India, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited
  • Sinari, Ramakant (2000), Advaita and Contemporary Indian Philosophy. In: Chattopadhyana (gen.ed.), "History of Science, Philosophy and Culture in Indian Civilization. Volume II Part 2: Advaita Vedanta", Delhi: Centre for Studies in Civilizations