Nimbarka

Last updated • 6 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

‹ The template Infobox religious biography is being considered for merging. ›
Nimbarka
Nimbarkacharya's holy icon at Ukhra Mahanta Asthal(West Bengal).JPG
An icon of Nimbarkacharya at Ukhra Mahanta Asthal, West Bengal.
Personal life
Born
Niyamananda

Pratiṣṭḥāna, India [1]
Parents
  • Jagannath and Sarasvati
  • or
  • Aruna Rishi and Jayanti devi [2]
HonorsJagadguru, Pravakta acharya
Religious life
Religion Hinduism
Order Vedanta
Founder of Nimbarka Sampradaya
Philosophy Dvaitadvaita Vedanta
Religious career
Disciples
Influenced
Quotation

To the left hand side of Goloka Bihari is the daughter of King Vrishabhanu, Sri Radha, who is as beautiful as the Lord and is worshipped by thousands of handmaidens. She fulfills the wishes of all. Sri Kishori is eternally remembered as Sri Ji.

Contents

Nimbarka, also known as Nimbarkacharya, Nimbaditya or Niyamananda, was a Hindu philosopher, theologian and the chief proponent of the theology of Dvaitādvaita (dvaita–advaita) or dualistic–non-dualistic sometimes known as Svābhāvika bhedābheda. He played a major role in spreading the worship of the divine couple Radha and Krishna, and founded the Nimbarka Sampradaya. [5] [6]

Nimbarka is believed to have lived around the 12th century, [7] but this dating has been questioned, suggesting that he lived somewhat earlier than Shankaracharya, in the 6th or 7th century CE. [1] Born in Southern India in a Telugu Brahmin family, [6] he spent most of his life in Mathura, Uttar Pradesh. He is sometimes identified with another philosopher named Bhaskara, [8] but this is considered to be a misconception due to the differences between the spiritual views of the two saints. [3] [9]

Etymology and epithets

The word 'Nimbārka' (निंबार्क) is derived from two Sanskrit words — nimba (निम्ब) and arka (अर्क). It is believed that Nimbarka was given the name 'Niyamananda' at his birth. According to a folk tale, Niyamananda achieve the name Nimbarka because he trapped some rays of sunlight (arka) in the leaves of Neem (nimba). He was also referred as Nimbaditya by his followers. [10] Sometimes Bhaskara is also considered his epithet because of the identification of Nimbarka with the philosopher Bhaskara. [11] The tradition which he founded is named after him.

Datings

Nimbarka's traditional followers believe that he appeared in 3096 BCE, but this dating is controversial as historians believe that he lived between 7th and 11th century CE. [10] According to Roma Bose, Nimbarka lived in the 13th century, on the presupposition that Nimbarkacharya was the author of the work Madhvamukhamardana. [12] Meanwhile, Vijay Ramnarace concluded that the work Madhvamukhamardana has been wrongly attributed to Nimbarkacharya. [13] This view is also supported by traditional scholars, who hold a similar perspective. [14] Bhandarkar places Nimbārka after Rāmānuja, suggesting 1162 CE as the approximate date of his demise, [15] though he acknowledged that this estimation is highly speculative. [16] S.N. Dasgupta, on the other hand, dates Nimbārka to the mid-14th century. [17] Dasgupta bases this dating on the absence of Nimbārka's mention in the Sarvadarśanasaṅgraha, a doxography by 14th-century author Mādhava Vidyāraṇya. [18] However, it is important to note that none of the Bhedābhedins—whether Bhartṛprapañca, Nimbārka, Bhāskara, or Yādavaprakāśa—are referenced in the Sarvadarśanasaṅgraha. [19] While S. A. A. Rizvi assigns a date of c.1130–1200 CE. [20]

According to Satyanand, Bose's dating of the 13th century is an erroneous attribution. [21] Malkovsky, following Satyanand, notes that in Bhandarkar's own work it is clearly stated that his dating of Nimbarka was an approximation based on an extremely flimsy calculation; yet most scholars chose to honour his suggested date, even until modern times. [5] According to Malkovsky, Satyanand has convincingly demonstrated that Nimbarka and his immediate disciple Srinivasacharya flourished well before Ramanuja (1017–1137 CE), arguing that Srinivasacharya was a contemporary, or just after Sankaracarya (early 8th century). [5] According to Ramnarace, summarising the available research, Nimbarka must be dated in the 7th century CE. [22]

Biography

Little is known about Nimbarka's life. He is said to have been born into a Telugu Brahmin family [6] on the 3rd bright half of the month Vaisakha and his parents were Jagannath, a Bhagavata saint, and his wife Sarasvati, who lived in Pratiṣṭḥāna, which is in present-day Paithan, Maharashtra. [1] [23] However, some other versions suggest that the name of his parents were Aruna Rishi and Jayanti Devi, [2] who lived in a place near the river Godavari, which may be in Maharashtra. Nimbarka's followers believe him as the incarnation of Vishnu's weapon, Sudarshana Chakra. [10] [24]

It is believed that Nimbarka was given the name Niyamananda at his birth, but sometimes Bhaskara is considered as his birth name. [11] [25] During Nimbarka's early years, it is described that his family moved to Vrindavan, but there is no historical recorded account. [26]

Works of Nimbarka

Vedanta Parijata Saurabha

The Vedānta Pārijāta Saurabha composed by Nimbārka is extremely concise and does not refute the views of others. This form of commentary undoubtedly indicates it's antiquity. [27] The Vedānta Pārijāta Saurabha represents an earlier style of Brahmasūtra commentary in the manner of the authors that preceded Śaṅkara. [28] It supports the bhedābheda school of Vedānta, [27] which advocates the view of a relationship of simultaneous unity and diversity between Brahman, the individual soul (jīva) and the universe (jagat). [29]

Vedānta Pārijāta Saurabha is further commented by Srinivasacharya in his Vedanta kaustubha [30] [31]

Vedanta kamadhenu dashashloki

The dashashloki is very simple, suited to a devotee who does not want to be bothered with abstract logical theories and hair-splitting wranglings, but wants to have the truth immediately in a nut-shell. [32] [33]

The Vedānta kāmadhenu Daśaślokī have been extensively commented upon by several scholars. Among them, the three primary commentaries [34] are:

Mantrarahasyaṣoḍaśī and Prapannakalpavallī

Mantrarahasyaṣoḍaśī is a work consisting of 18 verses, with the first 16 dedicated to exposition of the revered 18-syllable Gopāla Mantra, a central element of the Nimbārka tradition. Sundara bhaṭṭācharya has authored a commentary on this work titled Mantrārtharahasya. [39]

The Prapannakalpavallī explains the mukunda śaraṇāgati mantra. On this, Sundara bhaṭṭācharya has written an extensive commentary titled Prapannasuratarumañjarī. [39]

Philosophy

Nimbarka's Dvaitadvaita philosophy emphasizes a dualistic non-dualism where the soul is both distinct and non-distinct from God. His teachings emphasize devotion to Krishna and Radha. [40]

Brahman

According to Nimbarka, the ultimate reality or Brahman is Krishna, recognized by various names such as Purushottama, Hari, and Bhagavan. He is accompanied by Radha. Brahman, as described by Nimbarka, is flawless, possessing auspicious qualities and transcending the influence of karma, and with attributes such as knowledge, power, and compassion; Brahman is also both the material and efficient cause of creation, likened to a sovereign emperor engaging in playful activities without specific outcomes in mind. [41]

Jiva

Nimbarka considered the jiva to possess inherent knowledge (jnana), which distinguishes it from non-sentient elements such as the body, sense organs, and mind. This inherent knowledge permeates every state of the jiva, including waking, dreaming, and deep sleep. Nimbarka explains that the jiva is both knowledge and knower, likening their relationship to that of a gem and its radiance, where they are distinct yet inseparable, existing in a relationship of substrate and attribute. [42]

Difference and Non-difference

Nimbarka's philosophy distinctively outlines the differences between jiva and Brahman by emphasizing their intrinsic relationship as cause and effect, part and whole. Brahman is portrayed as the ultimate cause and the whole, whereas jiva, the individual soul that experiences pleasure and pain, is seen as an effect or a transformation of Brahman. This relationship is analogous to clay transforming into pottery or a tree bearing leaves and fruits, showing differences between the source material and its derivatives. Using scriptural references, Nimbarka asserted that jiva, as a part of the omnipotent Brahman, lacks independence and fullness of power. [43]

Relation to other Vedanta schools

Like Nimbarka, acharyas of other Vedanta schools also accept the concepts of difference and non-difference between Jiva and Brahman as real, but they explain and reconcile these ideas in various ways: [44]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adi Shankara</span> 8th-century Indian Vedic scholar

Adi Shankara, also called Adi Shankaracharya, was an Indian Vedic scholar, philosopher and teacher (acharya) of Advaita Vedanta. Reliable information on Shankara's actual life is scanty, and his true impact lies in his "iconic representation of Hindu religion and culture," despite the fact that most Hindus do not adhere to Advaita Vedanta. He is seen by Hindus as "the one who restored the Hindu dharma against the attacks of the Buddhists and in the process helped to drive Buddhism out of India." Tradition also portrays him as the one who reconciled the various sects with the introduction of the Pañcāyatana form of worship, the simultaneous worship of five deities – Ganesha, Surya, Vishnu, Shiva and Devi, arguing that all deities were but different forms of the one Brahman, the invisible Supreme Being.

Vedanta, also known as Uttara Mīmāṃsā, is one of the six orthodox (āstika) traditions of textual exegesis and Hindu philosophy. The word Vedanta means 'conclusion of the Vedas', and encompasses the ideas that emerged from, or aligned and reinterpreted, the speculations and enumerations contained in the Upanishads, focusing, with varying emphasis on devotion and knowledge, and liberation. Vedanta developed into many traditions, all of which give their specific interpretations of a common group of texts called the Prasthānatrayī, translated as 'the three sources': the Upanishads, the Brahma Sutras, and the Bhagavad Gita.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Advaita Vedanta</span> Hindu tradition of textual interpretation

Advaita Vedanta is a Hindu tradition of textual exegesis and philosophy which states that jivatman, the individual experiencing self, is ultimately pure awareness mistakenly identified with body and the senses, and non-different from Ātman/Brahman, the highest Self or Reality. The term Advaita literally means "non-secondness", but is usually rendered as "nonduality", and often equated with monism.

Jiva, also referred as Jivātman, is a living being or any entity imbued with a life force in Hinduism and Jainism. The word itself originates from the Sanskrit verb-root jīv, which translates as 'to breathe' or 'to live'. The jiva, as a metaphysical entity, has been described in various scriptures such as the Bhagavad Gita and the Upanishads. Each subschool of Vedanta describes the role of the jiva with the other metaphysical entities in varying capacities. The closest translation into English and Abrahamic philosophies would be the soul.

Dvaita Vedanta ;, is a sub-school in the Vedanta tradition of Hindu philosophy. The term Tattvavada literally means "arguments from a realist viewpoint". The Tattvavada (Dvaita) Vedanta sub-school was founded by the 13th-century Indian philosopher-saint Madhvacharya. Madhvacharya believed in three entities: God, jiva (soul), and jada. The Dvaita Vedanta school believes that God and the individual souls (jīvātman) exist as independent realities, and these are distinct, being said that Vishnu (Narayana) is independent (svatantra), and Souls are dependent (paratantra) on him.

The Brahma Sūtras, also known as the Vedanta Sūtra, Shariraka Sūtra, and Bhikshu-sūtra, are a Sanskrit text which criticizes the metaphysical dualism of the influential Samkhya philosophy, and instead synthesizes and harmonizes divergent Upanishadic ideas and practices about the essence of existence, postulating God-like Brahman as the only origin and essence of everything. It is attributed to the sages Bādarāyaṇa, who is also called Vyāsa (arranger), but probably an accumulation of incremental additions and changes by various authors to an earlier work, completed in its surviving form in approx. 400–450 CE. The oldest version may be composed between 500 BCE and 200 BCE, with 200 BCE being the most likely date.

Jagadguru, literally meaning "guru of the universe", is a title used in Sanātana Dharma. Traditionally, it has been bestowed upon or used for ācāryas belonging to the Vedānta school who have written Sanskrit commentaries on the Prasthānatrayī – the Brahma sūtras, the Bhagavad-gītā and the principal Upaniṣads. Historically, jagadgurus have established a lineage and an institution to spread dharma which has been based in Varanasi, the centre of Sanskrit study.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radha Krishna</span> Divine couple in Hinduism

Radha-Krishna is the combined form of the Hindu god Krishna with his chief consort and shakti Radha. They are regarded as the feminine as well as the masculine realities of God, in several Krishnaite traditions of Vaishnavism.

Bhedābheda is more a tradition than a sub-school of Vedānta, which teaches that the individual self (jīvātman) is both different and not different from the ultimate reality known as Brahman.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Krishnaism</span> Group of Hindu traditions that reveres Krishna as the Supreme Being

Krishnaism is a term used in scholarly circles to describe large group of independent Hindu traditions—sampradayas related to Vaishnavism—that center on the devotion to Krishna as Svayam Bhagavan, Ishvara, Para Brahman, who is the source of all reality, not simply an avatar of Vishnu. This is its difference from such Vaishnavite groupings as Sri Vaishnavism, Sadh Vaishnavism, Ramaism, Radhaism, Sitaism etc. There is also a personal Krishnaism, that is devotion to Krishna outside of any tradition and community, as in the case of the saint-poet Meera Bai. Leading scholars do not define Krishnaism as a suborder or offshoot of Vaishnavism, considering it at least a parallel and no less ancient current of Hinduism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nimbarka Sampradaya</span> One of the four Vaiṣṇava Sampradāyas

The Nimbarka Sampradaya, also known as the Kumāra Sampradāya, Hamsa Sampradāya, and Sanakādi Sampradāya, is the oldest Vaiṣṇava sect. It was founded by Nimbarka, a Telugu Brahmin yogi and philosopher. It propounds the Vaishnava Bhedabheda theology of Dvaitadvaita (dvaita-advaita) or dualistic non-dualism. Dvaitadvaita states that humans are both different and non-different from Isvara, God or Supreme Being. Specifically, this Sampradaya is a part of Krishnaism—Krishna-centric traditions.

Bhāskara was an Indian philosopher and proponent of the Bhedabheda school of Vedanta philosophy. He wrote commentaries on the Brahma Sutras, and contested Shankara's doctrine of māyā.

Achintya-Bheda-Abheda is a school of Vedanta representing the philosophy of inconceivable one-ness and difference. In Sanskrit achintya means 'inconceivable', bheda translates as 'difference', and abheda translates as 'non-difference'. The Gaudiya Vaishnava religious tradition employs the term in relation to the relationship of creation and creator, between God and his energies. It is believed that this philosophy was taught by the movement's theological founder Chaitanya Mahaprabhu (1486–1534) and differentiates the Gaudiya tradition from the other Vaishnava Sampradayas. It can be understood as an integration of the strict dualist (Dvaita) theology of Madhvacharya and the monistic theology (Advaita) of Adi Shankara.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ramdas Kathiababa</span> Eighteenth-century Hindu religious leader, Nimbarka saint, philosopher.

Ramdas Kathiababa was a Hindu Spiritual leader of the Dvaitadvaita Nimbarka Sampradaya the 54th Acharya of the Nimbarka Sampradaya Sri Sri 108 Swami Ramdas Kathia Babaji Maharaj was known everywhere as Kathia Baba. He was born about two hundred years ago in the village of Lonachamari in the state of Punjab.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harivyas devacharya</span> Saint from India

Harivyas devacharya also known as Harivyasadeva was an Indian philosopher, theologian and poet. Born into a Gaud brahmin family, he became the 35th āchārya of the Nimbārka Sampradāya. Residing in the sacred town of Vrindavana, he was a disciple of Śrī Śrībhaṭṭa Devāchārya ji and his nom-de-plume was Hari Priyā.He also played a pivotal role in expanding the reach of the Nimbārka Sampradāya by sending twelve main disciples on missionary journeys across Indian Subcontinent, each establishing their own sub-lineage, some of which continue to thrive today.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Srinivasacharya</span> 7th century indian Vedantic Philosopher

Srinivasacharya also known as Srinivasa, was a vedantic philosopher and theologian. He was a disciple of Nimbārkacārya and an acharya of Nimbārka Sampradāya. Srinivasacharya composed Vedānta-Kaustubha at the request of Nimbārkacārya. Srinivasacharya's philosophical framework, known as Svabhāvika Bhedābheda, emphasizes the natural distinction and similarity between the individual soul and the supreme being.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dvaitadvaita Vedanta</span> One of the most popular schools of the Vedanta school of Hindu philosophy

Dvaitadvaita Vedanta, also known as Svabhavika Bhedabheda and as Svabhavika Bhinnabhinna,(Sanskrit: द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त, स्वाभाविक भेदाभेद, स्वाभाविक भिन्नाभिन्न, romanized: Dvaitādvaita Vedānta, Svābhāvika Bhedābheda, Svābhāvika Bhinnābhinna) is the philosophical doctrine of "natural identity-in-difference" or "natural difference cum-non-difference." It was propagated by the medieval Vedānta scholars Nimbarkacharya and Srinivasacharya, as an explication of bhedābheda, difference and non-difference of Atman and Brahman.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Keshav Kashmiri</span> 15th century indian Vedantic Philosopher

Keshav Kashmiri also known as keshavacharya and Keshava Kashmriri Bhattacharya was an Indian philosopher, theologian and poet. He was a Brāhmana, born in the province of Maharashtra, in the village named Vaidūrya-pattanam, also known as Pratiṣṭhāna. He was disciple of Mukunda and Gāṅgala bhaṭṭāchārya. He became the 33rd ācārya of the Nimbārka Sampradāya. Tradition is that he conquered thrice all learned men of his time. Hence the epithet 'Jagadvijayī is often prefixed to his name.

<i>Vedanta kamadhenu dashashloki</i> Sanskrit hymn

The Vedanta kamadhenu dashashloki is a Sanskrit hymn by the Hindu philosopher Nimbarkacharya of the Nimbarka Sampradaya tradition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Purushottamacharya</span> 9th century indian vedantic philosopher

Purushottamacharya also known as Purushottama, was a vedantic philosopher and theologian. He was a disciple of Viśvācārya and the third after Nimbarka. He was 7th acharya of Nimbarka Sampradaya. Purushottamacharya composed Vedāntaratnamañjūṣā, a commentary on Nimbārkācharya's work Vedanta kamadhenu dashashloki

References

  1. 1 2 3 Ramnarace 2014, p. 113.
  2. 1 2 Saraswati 1997, p. 174.
  3. 1 2 Dalal 2010, p. 129.
  4. ↑ Bhandarkar 1987, p. 85.
  5. 1 2 3 Malkovsky 2001, p. 118.
  6. 1 2 3 "Nimbarka | Indian philosopher | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 14 January 2022.
  7. ↑ Jones & Ryan 2006, p. 312.
  8. ↑ Hoiberg 2000.
  9. ↑ Raju 2013, p. 158.
  10. 1 2 3 Mukundananda 2014.
  11. 1 2 Ph.D 2016, p. 194.
  12. ↑ Bose 1940.
  13. ↑ Ramnarace 2014, p. 76,77.
  14. ↑ SrI Purushottamacharya ji (1950). Vedanta Ratna Manjusha With Kunchika Part 2. pp. 6, 7.
  15. ↑ Bhandarkar 1987, p. 62,63.
  16. 1 2 Bhandarkar 1987, p. 63.
  17. ↑ Dasgupta 1988, p. 400,401.
  18. ↑ Dasgupta 1988, p. 400.
  19. ↑ Ramnarace 2014, p. 79,80.
  20. ↑ Saiyed A A Rizvi- A history of Sufism in India, Vol.1 (Munshi Ram Manoharlal Publishing Private Limited: 1978), page 355
  21. ↑ Satyanand, J. Nimbārka: A Pre-Śaṅkara Vedāntin and his philosophy, Varanasi, 1997
  22. ↑ Ramnarace 2014, p. 180.
  23. ↑ Agarwal 2013, p. 62.
  24. ↑ Bhandarkar 1987.
  25. ↑ Pandey 2008.
  26. ↑ Dalal 2010.
  27. 1 2 upadhyay 1978, p. 300.
  28. ↑ Ramnarace 2014, p. 100.
  29. ↑ Ramnarace 2014, p. 81.
  30. ↑ Agrawal 2013, p. 97.
  31. ↑ Dasgupta 1988, p. 402.
  32. ↑ Bose 2004, p. 920.
  33. ↑ Ramnarace 2014, p. 189.
  34. 1 2 3 4 Dasgupta 1988, p. 403.
  35. 1 2 Agrawal 2013, p. 269.
  36. ↑ Naganath, Dr S. Srikanta Sastri, English Translation by S. (11 May 2022). Indian Culture: A Compendium of Indian History, Culture and Heritage. Notion Press. ISBN   978-1-63806-511-1.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  37. ↑ Upadhyay 1978, p. 305.
  38. ↑ Dasgupta 1988, p. 399.
  39. 1 2 Upadhyay 1978, p. 301.
  40. ↑ Dalal 2010b.
  41. ↑ Agrawal 1957, p. 110-111.
  42. ↑ Agrawal 1957, p. 100-101.
  43. ↑ Agrawal 1957, p. 81-83.
  44. ↑ Agrawal 1957, p. 135.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.