Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments

Last updated

Replacing animal Research
AbbreviationFRAME
Formation1969
TypeCharity
PurposeAnimal welfare
Headquarters Nottingham
Region served
United Kingdom
Budget
£800,805 [1]
Staff
6 [1]
Website https://replacinganimalresearch.org.uk/

In October 2024, Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments (FRAME) changed their name to Replacing Animal Research.

Contents

Replacing Animal Research is a charity based in Nottingham, UK, they fund and promotes alternatives to animal testing.

Replacing Animal Research was founded in London in 1969 by animal lover Dorothy Hegarty to promote and assist research into new techniques and valid scientific substitutes to replace animal research in medical, biological and pharmaceutical research.

Now, Replacing Animal Research focuses on three core areas of change: funding research, education, and policy work.

History

Replacing Animal Research was founded as FRAME by Dorothy Hegarty, who was introduced to the Three Rs by the biologist Charles Foister. [2] It was registered as a UK charity in 1969. [1] Replacing Animal Research had a starting fund of £100 and was first based in a room in the Hegarty house in Wimbledon, London. Eventually, money from donations provided a salary for a secretary. Soon, enough funds were available for FRAME to rent a shop in Worple Rd, Raynes Park, London where it was based for almost a decade.

1978 - FRAME held a symposium at the Royal Society on the Use of Alternatives in Drug Research.

1981 - Michael Balls became Chairman of the FRAME trustees and FRAME moved to Nottingham. Soon after, a research programme and links with the University of Nottingham were established.

1979 - The FRAME Toxicity Committee presented its first report on alternatives to using animals for toxicity testing at the Animals and Alternatives in Toxicity Testing conference, organised by FRAME, and held at the Royal Society in 1982.

1983 - ATLA (Alternatives to Laboratory Animals) relaunched With the help of funding from the Maurice Laing Foundation. ATLA, formerly a pamphlet style publication, was relaunched as a peer-reviewed international scientific journal.

1983 - FRAME joined with the British Veterinary Association (BVA) and the Committee for the Reform of Animal Experimentation (CRAE) to advise the government on the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.

1984 - FRAME receives first ever government grant to research replacement methods

1986 - FRAME expanded into new premises on the 1st floor of Eastgate House in the historic Lace Market area of Nottingham. In the same year, FRAME received the first Marchig Animal Welfare Award from the World Society for the Protection of Animals (Now known as World Animal Protection). The following year, Michael Balls became one of the founder members of the Animals Procedures Committee.

1989 - INVITTOX, a collection of protocols for in vitro methods in toxicology, was established. This database is now part of ECVAM's Scientific Information Service.

1991 - The FRAME Alternatives Laboratory (FAL) opened to conduct research into alternatives.

1995 - The FRAME office relocated to the newly built Russell & Burch House, Nottingham.

1998 - FRAME became a founder member of Focus on Alternatives. This body promotes dialogue between all UK groups that focus on replacement alternatives.

1999 - Bill Russell delivered the first annual FRAME Lecture at the Royal Society of Medicine. In 2005, the Annual Lecture was renamed the Bill Annett Lecture in memory of Bill Annett, and in recognition of his lifelong commitment to FRAME.

2000-2003 - EU regulators accepted the first three replacement alternatives to animal-based toxicity testing. One of these, a phototoxicity test, had been validated in a 1997 study that involved the FAL. [3]

2007 - The new FRAME Alternatives Laboratory opened at the University of Nottingham Medical School. [4]

2013 - Dr Anna Cadogan took over as Acting Chair of Trustees following the resignation of Professor Michael Balls.

2021 - FRAME joins the Alliance for Human Relevant Science [5]

2022 - FRAME joins The Coalition to Illuminate and Address Animal Methods Bias [6]

2024 - As part of The Coalition to Illuminate and Address Animal Methods Bias, FRAME wins a Lush Prize for Major Science Collaboration [7]

Funding

Replacing Animal Research receives no direct funding from local or central government and relies entirely on donations, legacies and corporate support. [8] A list of its current corporate supporters is available in its annual report each year.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Toxicology</span> Study of substances harmful to living organisms

Toxicology is a scientific discipline, overlapping with biology, chemistry, pharmacology, and medicine, that involves the study of the adverse effects of chemical substances on living organisms and the practice of diagnosing and treating exposures to toxins and toxicants. The relationship between dose and its effects on the exposed organism is of high significance in toxicology. Factors that influence chemical toxicity include the dosage, duration of exposure, route of exposure, species, age, sex, and environment. Toxicologists are experts on poisons and poisoning. There is a movement for evidence-based toxicology as part of the larger movement towards evidence-based practices. Toxicology is currently contributing to the field of cancer research, since some toxins can be used as drugs for killing tumor cells. One prime example of this is ribosome-inactivating proteins, tested in the treatment of leukemia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal testing</span> Use of animals in experiments

Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, animal research, and in vivo testing, is the use of non-human animals, such as model organisms, in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. This approach can be contrasted with field studies in which animals are observed in their natural environments or habitats. Experimental research with animals is usually conducted in universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, defense establishments, and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to the industry. The focus of animal testing varies on a continuum from pure research, focusing on developing fundamental knowledge of an organism, to applied research, which may focus on answering some questions of great practical importance, such as finding a cure for a disease. Examples of applied research include testing disease treatments, breeding, defense research, and toxicology, including cosmetics testing. In education, animal testing is sometimes a component of biology or psychology courses.

The Draize test is an acute toxicity test devised in 1944 by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) toxicologists John H. Draize and Jacob M. Spines. Initially used for testing cosmetics, the procedure involves applying 0.5 mL or 0.5 g of a test substance to the eye or skin of a restrained, conscious animal, and then leaving it for set amount of time before rinsing it out and recording its effects. The animals are observed for up to 14 days for signs of erythema and edema in the skin test, and redness, swelling, discharge, ulceration, hemorrhaging, cloudiness, or blindness in the tested eye. The test subject is commonly an albino rabbit, though other species are used too, including dogs. The animals are euthanized after testing if the test renders irreversible damage to the eye or skin. Animals may be re-used for testing purposes if the product tested causes no permanent damage. Animals are typically reused after a "wash out" period during which all traces of the tested product are allowed to disperse from the test site.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cruelty-free</span>

In the animal rights movement, cruelty-free is a label for products or activities that do not harm or kill animals anywhere in the world. Products tested on animals or made from animals are not considered cruelty-free, since these tests are often painful and cause the suffering and death of millions of animals every year.

The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) is a non-profit research and advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C. According to Charity Navigator, the organization works for "compassionate and effective medical practice, research, and health promotion."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing</span>

The Johns Hopkins University Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT) has worked with scientists, since 1981, to find new methods to replace the use of laboratory animals in experiments, reduce the number of animals tested, and refine necessary tests to eliminate pain and distress. CAAT is an academic, science-based center affiliated with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lord Dowding Fund for Humane Research</span>

The Lord Dowding Fund for Humane Research (LDF) – a department of the National Anti-Vivisection Society, the world's first anti-vivisection organisation – awards grants to scientists undertaking medical research which benefits humans, without the use of animals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Festing</span> British research scientist

Michael Festing is a British research scientist best known for his interest in animal testing.

Gillian Rose Langley is a British scientist and writer who specialises in alternatives to animal testing and animal rights. She was, from 1981 until 2009, the science director of the Dr Hadwen Trust for Humane Research, a medical research charity developing non-animal research techniques. She was an anti-vivisection member of the British government's Animal Procedures Committee for eight years, and has worked as a consultant on non-animal techniques for the European Commission, and for animal protection organizations in Europe and the United States. Between 2010 and 2016 she was a consultant for Humane Society International.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foundation for Biomedical Research</span> American animal welfare organization

The Foundation for Biomedical Research (FBR) is an American nonprofit organization, 501(c)(3), located in Washington, DC. Established in 1981, the organization is dedicated to informing the news media, teachers, and other groups about the need for lab animals in medical and scientific research. The organization, together with its partner, the National Association for Biomedical Research (NABR), argues that promoting animal research leads to improved health for both humans and animals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alternatives to animal testing</span> Test methods that avoid the use of animals

Alternatives to animal testing are the development and implementation of test methods that avoid the use of live animals. There is widespread agreement that a reduction in the number of animals used and the refinement of testing to reduce suffering should be important goals for the industries involved. Two major alternatives to in vivo animal testing are in vitro cell culture techniques and in silico computer simulation; however, some claim they are not true alternatives because simulations use data from prior animal experiments and cell cultures often require animal derived products, such as serum or cells. Others say that they cannot replace animals completely as they are unlikely to ever provide enough information about the complex interactions of living systems.

Michael Balls is a British zoologist and professor emeritus of medical cell biology at the University of Nottingham. He is best known for his work on laboratory animal welfare and alternatives to animal testing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tatsuji Nomura</span>

Tatsuji Nomura was a pioneer in the development of laboratory animals with the aim of assuring reproducibility of experimental results in medical research. He was Director of the Central Institute for Experimental Animals (CIEA), Japan

Rise for Animals is a national, registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit animal rights organization which aims to end nonhuman animal experimentation. It has been described as "one of the oldest and wealthiest anti-vivisection organizations in the United States".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Three Rs (animal research)</span> Principles for ethical use of animals in science

The Three Rs (3Rs) are guiding principles for more ethical use of animals in product testing and scientific research. They were first described by W. M. S. Russell and R. L. Burch in 1959. The 3Rs are:

  1. Replacement:methods which avoid the use of animals in research
  2. Reduction: use of methods that enable researchers to minimise the number of animals necessary to obtain reliable and useful information.
  3. Refinement: use of methods that alleviate or minimize potential pain, suffering, distress, or lasting harm and improve welfare for the animals used.

The Universities Federation for Animal Welfare (UFAW) is an animal welfare science society. It is a UK-registered scientific and educational charity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Directive 2010/63/EU</span> European Union legislation

Directive 2010/63/EU is the European Union (EU) legislation "on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes" and is one of the most stringent ethical and welfare standards worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">W. M. S. Russell</span> British zoologist, originator of the 3Rs concept

William Moy Stratton Russell, also known as Bill Russell, was a British zoologist and animal welfare worker. He was best known for writing, along with R. L. Burch (1926-1996) The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique (1959), a landmark in the humane use of animals in research, education and testing. Russell and Burch introduced the concept of the Three Rs in the scientific community and provided a blueprint for combining animal welfare considerations and quality of research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Uwe Marx</span>

Uwe Marx is a German physician and biotechnologist, and one of the world’s leading researchers in the fields of organ-on-a-chip technology and antibody production.

Björn Ekwall was a Swedish cell toxicologist, known for his pioneering work in in vitro toxicology.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "259464 - THE FUND FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF ANIMALS IN MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS (F R A M E)". The Charity Commission. Retrieved 16 March 2009.
  2. Annett, Bill (20 September 1995). "Obituary: Dorothy Hegarty". The Independent. Retrieved 16 March 2009.[ dead link ]
  3. Clothier, R.H. 2007 Phototoxicity and acute toxicity studies conducted by the FRAME Alternatives Laboratory: a brief review. ATLA 35, 515–519
  4. Utton, Tim (22 June 2007). "Taking Animals out of Laboratory Research". University of Nottingham Public Affairs Office. Retrieved 16 March 2009.
  5. "Who we are". Human Relevant Science. Retrieved 23 January 2024.
  6. "Illuminating and Addressing Animal Methods Bias". www.pcrm.org. Retrieved 23 January 2024.
  7. "COLAAB-orative Effort Led by Physicians Committee Wins Lush Prize". www.pcrm.org. Retrieved 15 October 2024.
  8. Caritas entry

Bibliography