In mathematics, geometric measure theory (GMT) is the study of geometric properties of sets (typically in Euclidean space) through measure theory. It allows mathematicians to extend tools from differential geometry to a much larger class of surfaces that are not necessarily smooth.
Geometric measure theory was born out of the desire to solve Plateau's problem (named after Joseph Plateau) which asks if for every smooth closed curve in there exists a surface of least area among all surfaces whose boundary equals the given curve. Such surfaces mimic soap films.
The problem had remained open since it was posed in 1760 by Lagrange. It was solved independently in the 1930s by Jesse Douglas and Tibor Radó under certain topological restrictions. In 1960 Herbert Federer and Wendell Fleming used the theory of currents with which they were able to solve the orientable Plateau's problem analytically without topological restrictions, thus sparking geometric measure theory. Later Jean Taylor after Fred Almgren proved Plateau's laws for the kind of singularities that can occur in these more general soap films and soap bubbles clusters.
The following objects are central in geometric measure theory:
The following theorems and concepts are also central:
The Brunn–Minkowski inequality for the n-dimensional volumes of convex bodies K and L,
can be proved on a single page and quickly yields the classical isoperimetric inequality. The Brunn–Minkowski inequality also leads to Anderson's theorem in statistics. The proof of the Brunn–Minkowski inequality predates modern measure theory; the development of measure theory and Lebesgue integration allowed connections to be made between geometry and analysis, to the extent that in an integral form of the Brunn–Minkowski inequality known as the Prékopa–Leindler inequality the geometry seems almost entirely absent.
Consider the Gauss map , which sends each point on a smooth surface to the unit vector orthogonal to its local tangent plane. This can be generalized. Let be a closed surface in containing the origin, and enclosing a convex region, then each point on has one or more local supporting planes. For any , define to be the set of orthogonal directions to all local supporting planes to at .
Now we define the multivalued Gauss map defined by where is the intersection of the ray with . This map then maps the uniform measure on to another measure by for any Borel set. This is the Gaussian curvature measure associated with . It is a Borel measure for any .
This then induces the inverse problem: Given a Borel measure on the sphere, is it a Gaussian curvature measure? Alexandrov showed the following: [1] : Thm. 2.21
Such can be constructed as follows: Approximate as the weak limit of a sequence of point-mass measures. Each is the Gaussian curvature measure of a polytope, and the sequence of polytopes converge to .
If has a bounded probability density function (in the sense of a Radon–Nikodym derivative):then is continuously differentiable (that is, its tangent planes are unique and varies continuously over its surface). [1] : Thm. 2.22
Similarly, we define the surface area measure of byfor any Borel set. It is a Borel measure for any . This has an intuitive picture in as follows: Consider an open set with a single connected continuous boundary . For each , produce the supporting plane of perpendicular to . As runs over , the supporting planes rub all over and the contact points produces a -dimensional closed subset of that encloses a -dimensional region of . Then is its measure.
For example, if is a rectangle of side lengths in the plane, then is the sum of four equal point mass measures but is the sum of four point mass measures .
Given a convex function where is an open subset of , its associated Monge–Ampère measure on is defined as , where is the subdifferential function, and is the Lebesque measure on . This has applications in the study of weak solutions to the Monge–Ampère equation. It is a nonnegative, locally finite, Borel measure. [1] : Sec. 2.1