During the 2006 July War, a number of international incidents occurred in Lebanon, largely involving United Nations personnel who have come under a number of attacks by Israeli forces.
Most notably on 25 July 2006, four unarmed United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO) peacekeepers were killed during an Israeli air strike on a UN observation post in southern Lebanon. Israel later stated that the attack was an error due to the incorrect identification of the UN position as a militant enemy post. The observation post was built in 1948, had clear UN markings, and UN staff (including Deputy Secretary-General Mark Malloch Brown) had contacted the IDF at least 14 times telling them to call off the attack. [1]
The United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO) was created on 29 May 1948 following the founding of the state of Israel on 14 May 1948. Massive civil unrest and armed resistance from Palestinians against Zionism, alongside the immediate outbreak of war between Israel and Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Egypt in support of Palestine, led the UN Security council to adopt UN Security Council Resolution 50 calling for an immediate truce and establishing a military force to oversee that it be carried out. [2] The first Peacekeepers arrived in Palestine in June 1948, and saw their first casualty in July while investigating an alleged violation of the truce provisions by Israeli forces. [3] Since then, UNTSO command structure was expanded to support UNIFIL and other similar operations in the region. [4]
The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, or UNIFIL, was created by the United Nations through Security Council Resolution 425 and 426 on 19 March 1978. UNIFIL's objective was to confirm Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, to restore international peace and security, and to help the Lebanese Government restore effective authority in the area. [5] The first UNIFIL troops to arrive in the area on 23 March 1978 were reassigned from other UN peacekeeping operations in the area (namely UNEF and UNDOF). [5] During the 1982 Lebanon War, U.N. positions were overrun, primarily by the South Lebanon Army forces under Major Saad Haddad. These were the indigenous Lebanese forces supported by the IDF. [6] During the occupation, UNIFIL's function was mainly to provide humanitarian aid.
In 1999, Israel undertook a full withdrawal, which concluded in 2000 and enabled UNIFIL to resume its military tasks. The UN Security Council extended UNIFIL's mandate until 31 August 2006. [7] About 50 members of the unarmed UNTSO were evacuated to lightly armed UNIFIL positions for security reasons during the 2006 July War in Lebanon. [8] During this time (as in past conflicts) the peacekeeping force mainly came under attack from Israeli forces. [9]
On 15 July 2006, the IDF unilaterally established a "security zone" along the Blue Line and informed the UNIFIL that any person or vehicle entering and approaching the Blue Line, including United Nations personnel, would be shot. This zone was directly within UNIFIL's area of operation, enveloped multiple UNIFIL positions, and Israeli policy made it impossible for UNIFIL positions to be evacuated or carry out their oversight role for either side of the conflict. [10]
On 25 July 2006, the UNIFIL Khiyam base, which was primarily a simple white three-story building with UN markings, faced heavy artillery and aerial bombardment by the IDF over a period of 6 hours. According to the IDF, this was meant to target Hezbollah positions some 150 meters away, who were reportedly firing on them. A UN investigation found that no Hezbollah attack had taken place in that area that day. [10] According to the UN, the post called an Israeli liaison officer at least 14 times throughout the day to call off the bombardment and an Israeli official promised to halt the bombing each time. [11] [12] [13] [14] [1] [10] The site of the observation post was well known, having been built in 1948 and clearly marked. [1] [15] Both sides in the conflict had the coordinates of the compound. [10]
At 6:30pm, four artillery shells impacted and exploded within the position, destroying the main building and damaging the shelter underneath. The four unarmed United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO) peacekeepers from Austria, China, Finland and Canada who manned the post at the time were forced to flee to the damaged shelter underneath the building. [16] At 7:25pm a 500 kilogram precision-guided bomb struck and destroyed both the base and bunker underneath, burying and killing everyone inside. [10]
A UNIFIL rescue team of Indian soldiers was immediately dispatched to the scene. They recovered the bodies of three observers from the rubble while there was still active hostilities. [17] Danny Ayalon, Israel's ambassador to the United States, said that "UNIFIL obviously got caught in the middle" of a gunfight between Hezbollah guerillas and Israeli troops. "We do not have yet confirmation what caused these deaths. It could be [Israel Defense Forces]. It could be Hezbollah," he said. [18]
By 8 August 2006, the bodies of observers were retrieved and identified. The four victims of the attack, from UNTSO Team Sierra, were:
Secretary-General Kofi Annan initially stated that he was "...shocked and deeply distressed by the apparently deliberate targeting by Israeli Defence Forces." [24] "This coordinated artillery and aerial attack on a long-established and clearly marked U.N. post at Khiyam occurred despite personal assurances given to me by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that U.N. positions would be spared Israeli fire," he said in a statement. "Furthermore, General Alain Pellegrini, the U.N. force commander in south Lebanon, had been in repeated contact with Israeli officers throughout the day, stressing the need to protect that particular U.N. position from attack." [25]
At a later press conference the day after a phone call with Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert, Annan seemed to soften his stance and clarified that "[t]he statement said 'apparently deliberate targeting,'" stressing that the word "apparent is important in this." He added that he spoke to Olmert and accepted his "deep sorrow" for the incident, which he said Olmert "definitely believes" was a mistake that will be investigated. [26]
The United Nations Security Council failed to agree on a statement responding to the Israeli attack after the United States refused to accept language condemning: "any deliberate attack against U.N. personnel." [27] On 27 July, the Security Council issued a statement calling on the Israeli government to conduct a comprehensive inquiry into the incident and stressed that "Israel and all concerned parties" must comply with their obligations under international humanitarian law on the protection of UN personnel. [28] Many within the UN called for a joint UN-Israeli investigation into the incident. Israel refused. [29]
A UN officer stationed in Lebanon would later note that the biggest area to maneuver heavy armor was in the valley directly below the UNIFIL Khiyam base, and if the IDF did not want this observed, they would have to get rid of it. [30]
Danny Ayalon, Israeli ambassador to the United States, called Annan's statement "outrageous". Israel's U.N. ambassador, Dan Gillerman, said he, too, was "deeply distressed" that Annan alleged that the strike was deliberate. "I am surprised at these premature and erroneous assertions made by the secretary-general, who while demanding an investigation, has already issued its conclusions," Gillerman said in a statement. [18] Many right-leaning and Israeli news outlets described Annan’s statement as indicative of the UN's anti-Israel bias. [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36]
An Israeli senior commander stated that Hezbollah forces fired rockets from as little as 30–40 metres (98–131 ft) from UNIFIL bases, seeking to avoid Israeli counter-fire, and had sought refuge in UNIFIL bases on occasion. UNIFIL maintained that Hezbollah fighters were not allowed into any of its bases. However, they reported more than 20 instances of rockets being fired from less than 500m from their positions, as well as a number of cases of small arms and mortar fire from within 100m. Additionally, UNIFIL reported several instances of their positions and vehicles being hit by Hezbollah mortars, small arms fire, or rockets. [37]
On 26 July 2006, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert phoned Kofi Annan and expressed his deep regret over the death of the four UN observers. He promised that Israel would thoroughly investigate the incident and would share the findings with Annan, but said that he was taken aback by secretary general’s statement saying that the Israeli attack on the UN post was "apparently deliberate". [38]
Ambassador Gillerman ruled out major U.N. involvement in any potential international force in Lebanon, deriding the UN peacekeepers in Lebanon, saying that "It has never been able to prevent any shelling of Israel, any terrorist attack, any kidnappings... They either didn't see or didn't know or didn't want to see, but they have been hopeless." On the question of what would replace the UN peacekeepers, Gillerman stated that more "professional" troops "from countries who have the training and capabilities to be effective" were needed for such a volatile situation. [29]
In an interview with Reuters, Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev said that "Israel sincerely regrets the tragic death of the UN personnel in south Lebanon. We do not target UN personnel and, since the beginning of this conflict, we have made a consistent effort to ensure the safety of all members of (the UN peacekeeping force). This tragic event will be thoroughly investigated." [39]
In response to the killing, a Board of Inquiry was convened by Lieutenant Governor J.C.M. Gautier. The board report had found Israel to be at fault for the incident, and noted that Israel had refused to cooperate with the investigation, providing only a "non-paper" summary of its own investigation. [40]
Canada’s prime minister during the conflict, Stephen Harper, a staunch supporter of Israel and critic of the UN, said he did not believe Israel targeted the post, and pointed to the fact that Israel has been "co-operating with us in our evacuation efforts, in our efforts to move Canadian citizens out of Lebanon, and also trying to keep our own troops that are on the ground involved in the evacuation out of harm's way." [41]
Hess-Von Krudener's widow, Cynthia Hess-Von Kruedener said in a 2008 CBC interview the she believed that the bombing was a deliberate act by Israeli forces, due to her husbands reporting of what he suggested were war crimes committed by Israeli forces. [40] She remarked in a letter, in response to the Canadian government's inquiry into the incident: [42]
If 6 hours of artillery shelling was an operational error – and bombing a UN bunker was an operational error – what are the odds that two operational errors (land and air) occurred within an hour of each other and in the same place? ... This was not an accident.
Ireland's foreign minister Dermot Ahern and its defence minister Willie O'Dea were angered because Irish peace keeping troops had been on duty in the observation post 24 hours before the strike. They also said that a senior Irish soldier working for the UN forces was in contact with the Israeli Defence Force's UNIFIL liaison office six times to warn them that their bombardment was endangering the lives of UN staff. Both Ministers called in the Israeli ambassador to Ireland to express their anger and dissatisfaction. [43]
Ireland has filed an official protest with Israel.
China strongly condemned the action and demanded a thorough investigation and formal apology from Israel for the attack. 180 Chinese military officers and engineers were in Lebanon as part of UN peacekeeping operations at the time. [44] Lt. Colonel Du Zhaoyu's body was brought back to China in a large ceremony attended by PLA Assistant Chief of General Staff Zhang Qinsheng and China's Assistant Foreign Minister Cui Tiankai, along with over 100 Chinese military officers. In 2021, representatives from the Chinese contingent of the UN Peacekeepers and the Chinese embassy to Lebanon took part in a memorial ceremony at the site of the attack. [45]
Austria's foreign minister, Ursula Plassnik, told her Israeli counterpart by telephone that the bombing was unacceptable and urged Israel to stop its attack on the area. [41]
The UN Investigations on the 25th of July incident found no justification for it or the 29 other instances it found of the IDF "directly attacking" UN peacekeeping personnel during the month-long conflict. [10] It additionally found that the IDF justification for these attacks and repeated attacks on Civilian infrastructure, which generally centered around Hezbollah either hiding within/near or utilizing these facilities, was too broad and fell apart under scrutiny. One report summary states that "[b]y using this argument, the IDF effectively changed the status of all civilian objects by alleging that they might be used by Hezbollah. Further, the Commission is convinced that damage inflicted on some infrastructure was done for the sake of destruction." [10]
The report into the wider conflict concludes: [10]
Israel launched an investigation into the bombing and concluded that the incident was a case of "human error". The report says incorrectly copied military maps meant the post was wrongly identified, and Israeli aircraft attacked the post in the belief it was a Hezbollah position. Israel's foreign ministry spokesman, Mark Regev, assured that the report concludes the attack was human error and that the UN and relevant countries had been allowed to read the report. Israel did not make the report public. [1]
In 2008, a Canadian board of inquiry released a report on the attack. The report blamed the Israeli Defence Forces for the incident. It also stated that both the Israeli military and the UN refused to provide requested documents for the investigation, and Israel failed to make their investigation available to Canadian authorities. Instead, Israel provided a summary "which lacked sufficient detail to explore certain issues to their fullest extent." [46] Citing "security reasons", the Canadian report was removed from the Canadian government's website under Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper and has not been restored as of November 2023. [30] Major Paeta Hess-von Kruedener's widow, Cynthia, denounced this decision and accused Prime Minister Harper of shielding Israel. [47]
In an email dated 18 July received by CTV and published 24 July, the deceased Canadian peacekeeper Major Paeta Hess-von Kruedener, stated: "What I can tell you is this: we have on a daily basis had numerous occasions where our position has come under direct or indirect fire from both artillery and aerial bombing. The closest artillery has landed within 2 meters of our position and the closest 1000 lb aerial bomb has landed 100 meters from our patrol base. This has not been deliberate targeting, but has rather been due to tactical necessity." [48]
According to retired Canadian major general Lewis MacKenzie, interviewed on CBC radio on 26 July, Hess-von Kruedener's phrase "due to tactical necessity" was "veiled speech in the military. What he was telling us was Hezbollah fighters were all over his position and the IDF were targeting them." [33] [49] [50] However, von Kruedener's widow stated on 29 July that she blamed the IDF for her husband’s death. She said "Why did they bomb the UN site? In my opinion, those are precision-guided missiles [so] then that it is intentional....And that wasn't the only day they were firing on that base. My information from him [her husband] is that week upon week they had been firing on there, bombing near it." [15]
As of 2023 the base remains in ruins. On its grounds is now a memorial consisting of two T-shaped walls with the portraits of the fallen UN peacekeepers hanging from it. In 2021, a ceremony was held at the site attended by representatives from the UN and the countries of the victims marking the 15th anniversary of the attack. [45]
The UNIFIL press releases mention dozen of attacks and near misses on its presence during the present conflict. [51] UNIFIL recorded a total of 30 instances of direct attacks and 208 "close firings" on UNIFIL positions by the IDF, and 6 direct attacks by Hezbollah. [10]
Country | Civilian | Military |
---|---|---|
Austria | 1 dead | |
Canada | 1 dead | |
China, People’s Republic of | 1 dead 3 wounded | |
Finland | 1 dead | |
Ghana | 5 wounded | |
India | 3 wounded | |
Italy | 1 wounded | |
Nigeria | 1 dead | |
Total | 1 dead | 4 dead 12 wounded |
In the aftermath of the war, aircraft of the Israeli Air Force began fly over Lebanon. In September 2006, Major General Alain Pellegrini of France, commander of UNIFIL, warned that the flyovers violated the cease-fire, and that force might be used to stop the incursions. [65] In October 2006, a number of incidents between the Israeli Air Force and UN peacekeepers took place:
The United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO) is an organization founded on 29 May 1948 for peacekeeping in the Middle East. Established amidst the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, its primary task was initially to provide the military command structure to the peacekeeping forces in the Middle East to enable the peacekeepers to observe and maintain the ceasefire, and in assisting the parties to the Armistice Agreements in the supervision of the application and observance of the terms of those Agreements. The organization's structure and role has evolved over time as a result of the various conflicts in the region and at times UNTSO personnel have been used to rapidly deploy to other areas of the Middle East in support of other United Nations operations. The command structure of the UNTSO was maintained to cover the later peacekeeping organisations of the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) to which UNTSO continues to provide military observers.
The Qana massacre took place on April 18, 1996, near Qana, a village in then Israeli-occupied Southern Lebanon, when the Israeli military fired artillery shells at a United Nations compound, which was sheltering around 800 Lebanese civilians, killing 106 and injuring around 116. Four Fijian United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon soldiers were also seriously injured.
The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, or UNIFIL, is a United Nations peacekeeping mission established on 19 March 1978 by United Nations Security Council Resolutions 425 and 426, and several further resolutions in 2006 to confirm Hezbollah demilitarisation, support Lebanese army operations against insurgents and weapon smuggling, and confirming Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, in order to ensure that the government of Lebanon would restore its effective authority in the area. The 1978 South Lebanon conflict came in the context of Palestinian insurgency in South Lebanon and the Lebanese Civil War.
The Blue Line is a demarcation line dividing Lebanon from Israel and the Golan Heights. It was published by the United Nations on 7 June 2000 for the purposes of determining whether Israel had fully withdrawn from Lebanon. It has been described as "temporary" and "not a border, but a “line of withdrawal”. It is the subject of an ongoing border dispute between Israel, Lebanon, and Hezbollah.
United Nations Security Council resolution 1583, adopted unanimously on 28 January 2005, after recalling previous resolutions on Israel and Lebanon, including resolutions 425 (1978), 426 (1978) and 1553 (2004), the council extended the mandate of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) for a further six months until 31 July 2005 and condemned violence along the Blue Line.
This is a timeline of events related to the 2006 Lebanon War.
The Israeli–Lebanese conflict, or the South Lebanon conflict, is a long-running conflict involving Israel, Lebanon-based paramilitary groups, and sometimes Syria. The conflict peaked during the Lebanese Civil War. In response to Palestinian attacks from Lebanon, Israel invaded the country in 1978 and again in 1982. After this it occupied southern Lebanon until 2000, while fighting a guerrilla conflict against Shia paramilitaries. After Israel's withdrawal, Hezbollah attacks sparked the 2006 Lebanon War. A new period of conflict began in 2023, leading to the 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon.
The South Lebanon conflict was an armed conflict that took place in Israeli-occupied southern Lebanon from 1982 or 1985 until Israel's withdrawal in 2000. Hezbollah, along with other Shia Muslim and left-wing guerrillas, fought against Israel and its ally, the Catholic Christian-dominated South Lebanon Army (SLA). The SLA was supported militarily and logistically by the Israel Defense Forces and operated under the jurisdiction of the Israeli-backed South Lebanon provisional administration, which succeeded the earlier Israeli-backed Free Lebanon State. Israel officially names the conflict the Security Zone in Lebanon Campaign and deems it to have begun on 30 September 1982, after the end of its "Operation Peace for Galilee". It can also be seen as an extension of the Lebanese Civil War (1975–1990).
The ceasefire attempts during the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict started immediately, with Lebanon calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire already the day after the start of the war. Israel, however, strongly backed by the United States and the United Kingdom, insisted that there could be no ceasefire until Hezbollah's militia had been disarmed or removed from southern Lebanon. The United Nations Security Council held meetings throughout the conflict but failed to agree on a ceasefire resolution.
The 2006 Qana airstrike was an airstrike carried out by the Israeli Air Force (IAF) on a three-story building in the small community of al-Khuraybah near the South Lebanese village of Qana on July 30, 2006, during the 2006 Lebanon War. The strike killed 28 civilians, 16 of whom were children. Israel halted airstrikes for 48 hours following the attack, amid increasing calls for a ceasefire in the conflict between Israel and Lebanon's Hezbollah guerrillas.
There were many casualties in the 2006 Lebanon War, leading to condemnation of both sides, however the exact distribution of casualties has been disputed. The Lebanese Higher Relief Council (HRC), UNICEF, and various press agencies and news organizations have stated that most of those killed were Lebanese civilians, however the Lebanese government does not differentiate between civilians and combatants in death toll figures. The Israeli government identified 43 Israeli civilians killed by Hezbollah rocket attacks, including four who died of heart attacks during rocket attacks. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) death toll ranges from 118 to 121, depending on the source and whether or not casualties that occurred after the ceasefire are included. The figures for the Hezbollah fighters killed are the most varying, with Hezbollah claiming 250 of its fighters killed, while Israel claimed to have identified 530 dead Hezbollah fighters. The IDF estimates 600–700 dead Hezbollah fighters. Sources can be conflicting.
The 2006 Lebanon War, also called the 2006 Israel–Hezbollah War and known in Lebanon as the July War and in Israel as the Second Lebanon War, was a 34-day armed conflict in Lebanon, northern Israel and the Golan Heights. The principal parties were Hezbollah paramilitary forces and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). The conflict started on 12 July 2006, and continued until a United Nations-brokered ceasefire went into effect in the morning on 14 August 2006, though it formally ended on 8 September 2006 when Israel lifted its naval blockade of Lebanon.
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701 is a resolution that was intended to resolve the 2006 Lebanon War. The resolution calls for a full cessation of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah, the withdrawal of Hezbollah and other forces from Lebanon south of the Litani, the disarmament of Hezbollah and other armed groups, and the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon, with no armed forces other than UNIFIL and Lebanese military south of the Litani River, which flows about 29 km (18 mi) north of the border. It emphasizes Lebanon's need to fully exert government control and calls for efforts to address the unconditional release of abducted Israeli soldiers.
The 2000–2006 Shebaa Farms conflict was a low-level border conflict between Israel and Hezbollah for control of Shebaa Farms, a disputed territory located on the Golan Heights–Lebanon border. Fighting between the two sides primarily consisted of Hezbollah rocket and mortar attacks on Israel and Israeli artillery barrages and airstrikes on Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. Clashes began a few months after the 2000 Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, which Hezbollah viewed as incomplete due to the presence of the Israel Defense Forces in Shebaa Farms. The conflict culminated in the 2006 Lebanon War; Israel retains control over the territory.
During the 2006 Lebanon War, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and United Nations officials accused both Hezbollah and Israel of violating international humanitarian law. These have included allegations of intentional attacks on civilian populations or infrastructure, disproportionate or indiscriminate attacks, the use of human shields, and the use of prohibited weapons.
The 2010 Israel–Lebanon border clash occurred on August 3, 2010, between the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) and Israel Defense Forces (IDF), after an IDF team attempted to cut down a tree on the Israeli side of the Blue Line, near the Israeli kibbutz of Misgav Am and the Lebanese village of Odaisseh. A high-ranking IDF officer was killed and another wounded when LAF snipers opened fire on an Israeli observation post after receiving authorization from senior Lebanese commanders. IDF soldiers returned fire and responded with artillery shelling and airstrikes on Lebanese positions, killing two Lebanese soldiers and Al Akhbar correspondent Assaf Abu Rahhal, as well as wounding five soldiers and one journalist. This was the most serious escalation on the border since the 2006 Lebanon War.
On the 30 of September 1992, a series of clashes in South Lebanon between Hezbollah and the South Lebanon Army killed 9 people, including one UNIFIL peacekeeper.
Operation Northern Shield was an Israeli military operation that took place from 4 December 2018 until 13 January 2019. The operation's declared goal was to locate and destroy Hezbollah tunnels that cross the Blue Line from Lebanon into northern Israel. According to Israel, this operation is part of the ongoing Iran–Israel proxy conflict. On 17 December 2018, United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) acknowledged the existence of four tunnels near the Israel–Lebanon border and confirmed that two of them cross the Blue Line in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701, which helped end the 2006 Lebanon War.
On 13 October 2024, two Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Merkava tanks destroyed the main entrance to a United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) post in Ramyah and forcibly entered the area. A few hours later, the IDF fired rounds nearby, causing injuries to 15 UNIFIL peacekeepers.
The battle of Ramyah is an ongoing battle in the village of Ramyah between Israel and Hezbollah, amid the 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon. The battle also affected UNIFIL, who have sustained numerous attacks on their facilities by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).