Irene Khan

Last updated

Irene Khan
Irene Khan 2003.jpg
Khan in November 2003
UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression
Assumed office
July 2020

In 2003, Irene Khan wrote a piece titled Security for Whom? in which she, inter alia, accused the allies of the occupying force in Afghanistan of "mass killings". [19]

"Gulag" controversy

In 2005, Irene Khan penned the introduction to that year's Amnesty International report in which she, inter alia, referred to the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay as "the gulag of our time," accusing the United States of "thumb[ing] its nose at the rule of law and human rights [as] it grants a licence to others to commit abuse with impunity". [20] Much backlash followed in the media. Michael Totten of World Affairs called her a "hysterical heavy-breather". [21] An editorial opinion in the Washington Post referred to it as "[i]t is ALWAYS SAD when a solid, trustworthy institution loses its bearings and joins in the partisan fracas that nowadays passes for political discourse". [22] John Podhoretz of the New York Post said that "[t]he case of Amnesty International proves that well-meaning people can make morality their life's work and still be little more than moral idiots." [23] In his The United Nations, Peace and Security, Ramesh Thakur called Khan's likening of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility to a gulag a "hyperbole" that is "wrong". [24] A former Soviet prisoner of conscience, Pavel Litvinov, told the Amnesty International staffer, who called him to inquire on behalf of Khan whether it would be appropriate to use the word 'gulag' in an Amnesty report and in relation in the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, that there was "an enormous difference" between the gulags and the Guantanamo Bay detention facility. [25] Roger Kimball of Arma Virumque called it "a preposterous remark". [26] The Bush administration responded to it in the following manner: President Bush called it "an absurd allegation;" Vice President Cheney said he was "offended by it;" Defense Secretary Rumsfeld called it "reprehensible" and "those who make such outlandish charges los[ing] any claim to objectivity or seriousness". [27] Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Myers called it "absolutely irresponsible" [28] The White House spokesman Scott McClellan called the characterization "ridiculous". [29] Anne Applebaum, the author of Gulag: A History, found this characterization "infuriating," stating that "Amnesty misus[ed] language [and] discard[ed] its former neutrality" and that it "attack[ed] the American government for the satisfaction of [the Amnesty's] own political faction". [30]

However, not everyone rallied against Khan's 'gulag' characterization. Retired US State Department officer Edmund McWilliams who monitored prisoner abuse committed in the Soviet Union and Vietnam stated the following in support of Khan's characterization: "I note that abuses that I reported on in those inhumane systems parallel abuses reported in Guantanamo, at the Bagram air base in Afghanistan and at the Abu Ghriab prison: prisoners suspended from the ceiling and beaten to death; widespread "waterboarding;" prisoners "disappeared" to preclude monitoring by the International Committee of the Red Cross—and all with almost no senior-level accountability". [31] Aryeh Neier stated that the criticisms of Khan's statement were exaggerations and added, "The flurry of attention to Irene Khan's statement about the gulag probably contributed to a trend that had already been noted in prior years: namely, a decline in the organization's prestige in the United States to a level below its very high standing in Europe." [32]

Pay controversy

In February 2011, newspaper stories in the UK revealed that Khan had received a payment of £533,103 from Amnesty International following her resignation from the organization on 31 December 2009, [33] a fact pointed to from Amnesty's records for the 2009–2010 financial year. The sum paid to her was in excess of four times her annual salary of £132,490. [33] The deputy secretary general, Kate Gilmore, who also resigned in December 2009, received an ex-gratia payment of £320,000. [33] [34] Peter Pack, the chairman of Amnesty's International Executive Committee (IEC), initially stated on 19 February 2011: "The payments to outgoing secretary general Irene Khan shown in the accounts of AI (Amnesty International) Ltd for the year ending 31 March 2010 include payments made as part of a confidential agreement between AI Ltd and Irene Khan" [34] and that "It is a term of this agreement that no further comment on it will be made by either party." [33]

The payment and AI's initial response to its leakage to the press led to considerable outcry. Philip Davies, the Conservative MP for Shipley, decried the payment, telling the Daily Express : "I am sure people making donations to Amnesty, in the belief they are alleviating poverty, never dreamed they were subsidising a fat cat payout. This will disillusion many benefactors." [34] On 21 February Peter Pack issued a further statement, in which he said that the payment was a "unique situation" that was "in the best interest of Amnesty's work" and that there would be no repetition of it. [33] He stated that "the new secretary general, with the full support of the IEC, has initiated a process to review our employment policies and procedures to ensure that such a situation does not happen again." [33] Pack also stated that Amnesty was "fully committed to applying all the resources that we receive from our millions of supporters to the fight for human rights". [33] On 25 February, Pack issued a letter to Amnesty members and staff. In summary, it states that the IEC in 2008 had decided not to prolong Khan's contract for a third term. In the following months, IEC discovered that due to British employment law, it had to choose between the three options of either offering Khan a third term, discontinuing her post and, in their judgement, risking legal consequences, or signing a confidential agreement and issuing a pay compensation. [35]

Khan's lawyers issued a letter published by the Charity Times "It was not accurate of Amnesty International to record in its 2009/2010 corporate accounts that the amount £532,000 was paid to our client". [36] The published letter detailed the sum as including: a) her salary and contractual benefits until 31 December 2009; b) outstanding back pay and the shortfall arising in her contractual benefits from previous years (in some part going back to 2005); relocation costs for her return abroad from where she had been recruited; d) compensation as well as severance payment (£115,000 gross) in respect of a legal claim and grievances that our client had asserted against Amnesty International Limited pursuant to her UK employment rights). [36] Outgoing IEC Chairman Peter Pack, stated that paying off Khan was "the least worst option" available to IEC. [37] The amount paid out to Khan and her deputy (who was also removed by IEC) amounted to 4% of Amnesty International's budget that year. [38] The organization was hurt by this scandal and by choosing to pay Khan to leave,[ according to whom? ] with Chairman Pack promising to make amends and move the organization forward following Khan's departure. [37]

Family

Zubaida Rahman, the wife of politician Tarique Rahman of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) is the cousin of Irene Khan. [39] Irene Khan's uncle Rear Admiral Mahbub Ali Khan was the Chief of the Naval Staff of Bangladesh during the regime of Ziaur Rahman. [40]

Publications

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Asma Jahangir</span> Pakistani human rights activist and lawyer

Asma Jilani Jahangir was a Pakistani human rights lawyer and social activist who co-founded and chaired the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan and AGHS Legal Aid Cell. Jahangir was known for playing a prominent role in the Lawyers' Movement and served as the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief and as a trustee at the International Crisis Group.

Hooding is the placing of a hood over the entire head of a prisoner. Hooding is widely considered to be a form of torture; one legal scholar considers the hooding of prisoners to be a violation of international law, specifically the Third and Fourth Geneva Conventions, which demand that persons under custody or physical control of enemy forces be treated humanely. Hooding can be dangerous to a prisoner's health and safety. It is considered to be an act of torture when its primary purpose is sensory deprivation during interrogation; it causes "disorientation, isolation, and dread." According to the International Committee of the Red Cross, hooding is used to prevent a person from seeing, to disorient them, to make them anxious, to preserve their torturer's anonymity, and to prevent the person from breathing freely.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Australian immigration detention facilities</span> Facilities used to detain people under Australias policy of mandatory immigration detention

Australian immigration detention facilities comprise a number of different facilities throughout Australia, including the Australian territory of Christmas Island. Such facilities also exist in Papua New Guinea and Nauru, namely the Nauru Regional Processing Centre and the Manus Regional Processing Centre.

Torture, the infliction of severe physical or psychological pain upon an individual to extract information or a confession, or as an illicit extrajudicial punishment, is prohibited by international law and is illegal in most countries. However, it is still used by many governments. The subject of this article is the use of torture since the adoption of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which prohibited it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in Myanmar</span> Overview of human rights in Myanmar

Human rights in Myanmar under its military regime have long been regarded as among the worst in the world. In 2022, Freedom House rated Myanmar’s human rights at 9 out 100.

The human rights record of North Korea has been condemned, with the United Nations and groups such as Human Rights Watch all critical of it. Amnesty International considers North Korea to have no contemporary parallel with respect to violations of liberty.

Ghost detainee is a term used in the executive branch of the United States government to designate a person held in a detention center, whose identity has been hidden by keeping them unregistered and therefore anonymous. Such uses arose as the Bush administration initiated the War on Terror following the 9/11 attacks of 2001 in the United States. As documented in the 2004 Taguba Report, it was used in the same manner by United States officials and contractors of the Joint Interrogation and Debriefing Center at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq in 2003–2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fionnuala Ní Aoláin</span> Irish legal academic and U.N. Special Rapporteur on Human Rights

Fionnuala Ní Aoláin is an Irish academic lawyer specialising in human rights law. She is the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism for the United Nations Human Rights Council since August 1, 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manfred Nowak</span> Austrian human rights lawyer (born 1950)

Manfred Nowak is an Austrian human rights expert, who served as the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture from 2004 to 2010. He is Secretary General of the Global Campus of Human Rights in Venice, Italy, Professor of International Human Rights, and Scientific Director of the Vienna Master of Arts in Applied Human Rights at the University of Applied Arts in Vienna. He is also co-founder and former Director of the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights and a former judge at the Human Rights Chamber for Bosnia and Herzegovina. In 2016, he was appointed Independent Expert leading the United Nations Global Study on Children Deprived of Liberty.

<i>The Road to Guantánamo</i> 2006 British docudrama film by Michael Winterbottom and Mat Whitecross

The Road to Guantánamo, alternatively The Road to Guantanamo, is a British 2006 docudrama film written and directed by Michael Winterbottom and Mat Whitecross about the incarceration of three British citizens, who were captured in 2001 in Afghanistan and detained by the United States there and for more than two years at the detainment camp in Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba. It premiered at the Berlinale on 14 February 2006, and was first shown in the UK on Channel 4 on 9 March 2006. The following day it was the first film to be released simultaneously in cinemas, on DVD, and on the Internet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ian Martin (UN official)</span> UN Official

Ian Martin is an English human rights activist/advisor and sometime United Nations official. His most recent UN assignment was as the Special Representative of the Secretary-General and Head of the United Nations Support Mission in Libya. From 2015 to 2018 he was Executive Director of Security Council Report.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Guantanamo Bay detention camp</span> United States military prison in southeastern Cuba

The Guantanamo Bay detention camp is a United States military prison within the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, also referred to as Gitmo, on the coast of Guantánamo Bay in Cuba. As of April 2023, of the 779 people detained there since January 2002 when the military prison first opened after the September 11 attacks, 740 had been transferred elsewhere, 30 remained there, and nine had died while in custody.

Amnesty International USA (AIUSA) is an American non-profit non-governmental organization that is part of the worldwide Amnesty International organization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amnesty International</span> International non-governmental organisation

Amnesty International is an international non-governmental organisation focused on human rights, with its headquarters in the United Kingdom. The organisation says it has more than ten million members and supporters around the world. The stated mission of the organisation is to campaign for "a world in which every person enjoys all of the human rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights instruments." The organisation has played a notable role on human rights issues due to its frequent citation in media and by world leaders.

Indefinite detention is the incarceration of an arrested person by a national government or law enforcement agency for an indefinite amount of time without a trial. The Human Rights Watch considers this practice as violating national and international laws, particularly human rights laws, although it remains in legislation in various liberal democracies.

In the United States, human rights comprise a series of rights which are legally protected by the Constitution of the United States, state constitutions, treaty and customary international law, legislation enacted by Congress and state legislatures, and state referendums and citizen's initiatives. The Federal Government has, through a ratified constitution, guaranteed unalienable rights to its citizens and non-citizens. These rights have evolved over time through constitutional amendments, legislation, and judicial precedent. Along with the rights themselves, the portion of the population granted these rights has expanded over time. Within the United States, federal courts have jurisdiction over international human rights laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agnès Callamard</span> Secretary General of Amnesty International

Agnès Callamard is a French human-rights activist who is the Secretary General of Amnesty International. She was previously the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary, or arbitrary executions appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council, and the former Director of the Columbia University Global Freedom of Expression project.

Criticism of Amnesty International includes claims of selection bias, as well as ideology and foreign policy bias against either non-Western countries or Western-supported countries. Various governments criticized by Amnesty International have in turn criticized the organization, complaining about what they assert constituted one-sided reporting.

Marjorie Milne Farquharson was a political scientist and human rights worker.

Alice Jill Edwards is an Australian lawyer and scholar. She is the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

References

  1. 1 2 "Human Rights Council adopts four resolutions, appoints four special procedure mandate holders, and concludes its forty-fourth session". United Nations Human Rights Council.
  2. "Ms. Irene Khan, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of freedom of opinion and expression". United Nations The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved 13 April 2021.
  3. Hassan, Delwar (2012). "Khan, Gaznafor Ali". In Sirajul Islam; Miah, Sajahan; Khanam, Mahfuza; Ahmed, Sabbir (eds.). Banglapedia: the National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh (Online ed.). Dhaka, Bangladesh: Banglapedia Trust, Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. ISBN   984-32-0576-6. OCLC   52727562. OL   30677644M . Retrieved 23 January 2024.
  4. "Irene Khan". Fawcett Society. Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 4 June 2009.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "Amnesty International's Secretary General becomes the University of Salford's new Chancellor". University of Salfor d. 10 July 2009. Archived from the original on 6 January 2011. Retrieved 22 February 2011.
  6. "BRAC International Supervisory Board. Retrieved 29 September 2023".
  7. Pulido, Maki (23 January 2024). "UN special rapporteur Khan meets with NPC officials". GMA New Media .
  8. Domingo, Katrina (22 January 2024). "UN rapporteur on freedom of expression arrives in the Philippines". ABS-CBN News and Current Affairs .
  9. "Document - Irene Khan - Biography". Amnesty International. 6 May 2009.
  10. Advisory Council Transparency International.
  11. "Irene Khan, Member of the Board, HD". hdcentre.org. Archived from the original on 8 March 2015. Retrieved 16 March 2015.
  12. "Irene Khan — The Cast — Soldiers of Peace". Soldiersofpeacemovie.com. Archived from the original on 8 August 2009. Retrieved 18 October 2009.
  13. "Soldati di Pace (Soldiers of Peace)". Soldatidipace.blogspot.com. 18 October 2009. Retrieved 18 October 2009.
  14. "Irene Khan - Biography" (PDF). Amnesty International . Retrieved 1 May 2012.
  15. "Dies Natalis 2007". Over Universiteit Gent. Archived from the original on 19 March 2009. Retrieved 27 December 2008.
  16. "SOAS Honorary Fellows". SOAS. Archived from the original on 1 May 2019. Retrieved 3 August 2014.
  17. "Election of Chancellor: Election Procedure". University of Manchester. 7 May 2008. Retrieved 1 December 2018.
  18. "2006 Irene Khan". Sydney Peace Foundation. Retrieved 14 April 2018.
  19. "Security for Whom?" (PDF). London School of Economics.
  20. "Guantánamo is gulag of our time, says Amnesty". The Guardian. 25 May 2005.
  21. Michael Totten (24 May 2005). "The Gulag of Our Times". World Affairs. Archived from the original on 2 November 2015.{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  22. "'American Gulag'". The Washington Post (Editorial). 26 May 2005.
  23. John Podhoretz (27 May 2005). "Amnesty's Idiocy – Absurd Talk on Detainees". New York Post (Opinion).
  24. Ramesh Thakur (2006). The United Nations, Peace and Security: From Collective Security to the Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge University Press. pp. 107–. ISBN   978-1-139-45694-4.
  25. Pavel Litvinov (25 June 2005). "Amnesty's gulag idiocy". The Age. Melbourne.
  26. Roger Kimball (7 June 2005). "'The gulag of our times'?". The New Criterion.
  27. "Rumsfeld rejects Amnesty's 'gulag' label". CNN. 1 June 2005.
  28. "An American Gulag?". CBS News. 5 June 2005.
  29. "Guantánamo denounced as a "gulag"". The Seattle Times. 26 May 2005.
  30. Anne Applebaum (8 June 2005). "Amnesty's Amnesia". The Washington Post (Op-Ed).
  31. "A U.S. Gulag by Any Name". The Washington Post. 2 June 2005.
  32. Neier, Aryeh (2020). The International Human Rights Movement: A History. Princeton University Press. p. 201. ISBN   978-0-691-20099-6.
  33. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mason, Tania, "Charity Commission has 'no jurisdiction' over board member's payment from Amnesty", civilsociety.co.uk, 21 February 2011. Retrieved 21 February 2011.
  34. 1 2 3 Chapman, John, "Amnesty boss gets secret £500,000 payout", Daily Express, 19 February 2011. Retrieved 21 February 2011.
  35. Pack, Peter. "A letter to all AI members and staff from the International Executive Committee" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 September 2013. Retrieved 25 January 2012.
  36. 1 2 Russell, Jones & Walker (21 March 2011). "Letter from lawyers of Irene Khan" (PDF). Charity Times. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 September 2015.
  37. 1 2 "Paying off Khan was 'least-worst option' according to Amnesty's IEC chair". Civil Society Media.
  38. "Amnesty's pay-offs spark outrage". The Sunday Times. London. 20 February 2011. Archived from the original on 9 October 2015.
  39. "আলোচনায় ডা. জোবাইদা". Jugantor (in Bengali). Retrieved 9 October 2023.
  40. "আলোচনায় ডা. জোবাইদা". Jugantor (in Bengali). Retrieved 9 October 2023.