Jervis Bay Nuclear Power Plant

Last updated

Jervis Bay Nuclear Power Plant
Jervis Bay nuclear plant site.JPG
East end of the proposed site of the Jervis Bay Nuclear Power Plant, 2014
Jervis Bay Nuclear Power Plant
Country Australia
Location Jervis Bay Territory
Coordinates 35°07′34″S150°45′11″E / 35.126°S 150.753°E / -35.126; 150.753
StatusCancelled
Decommission date
  • 1971
Owners Government of New South Wales
Operators The Electricity Commission of NSW (Elcom)
Nuclear power station
Reactor type Steam-Generating Heavy Water Reactor (SGHWR)
Reactor supplierThe Nuclear Power Group Ltd. (TNPG)
Cooling source Jervis Bay, South Pacific Ocean
Power generation
Units cancelled1 x 600 MWe

The Jervis Bay Nuclear Power Plant was a proposed nuclear power reactor in the Jervis Bay Territory, an Australian federal territory adjoining the South Coast of the state of New South Wales. It would have been Australia's first nuclear power station, and is the only proposal to have received serious consideration by governments as of May 2023. Some environmental studies and site works were completed, and two rounds of tenders were called and evaluated, but the Australian Government ultimately decided not to proceed with the project, owing both to the perceived cost, and to the discovery of new mineral and hydrocarbon resources.

Contents

Background to the project

In 1969, the Australian government proposed to the New South Wales government that a 500 MWe nuclear power station should be built on Commonwealth territory and connected to the New South Wales grid, with electricity generation and distribution being a state responsibility under the Australian constitution. Possible sites were the Australian Capital Territory and Jervis Bay. The plan, supported by the Australian Atomic Energy Commission, was for a reactor design that could generate weapons-grade plutonium, possibly reflecting Australia's long-term post-World War II interest in acquiring nuclear weapons. [1] [2] [3]

In December 1969, invitations to express interest in the construction of a nuclear power plant at Jervis Bay were sent to fourteen organisations. Tender documents were issued in February 1970, with tenders closing in June. Fourteen tenders were received, from seven different organisations. About 70 staff were involved full-time in evaluating tenders, principally from the Australian Atomic Energy Commission and the Electricity Commission of New South Wales. More than 150 other staff had a significant part-time role. As a result, a recommendation was written for the acceptance of a tender to supply a 600 MWe Steam generating heavy water reactor (SGHWR), from the British organisation, The Nuclear Power Group. [4]

Proposed site layout for a 500 MW reactor at Murrays Beach (c.1970) Murrays Beach NPP.png
Proposed site layout for a 500 MW reactor at Murrays Beach (c.1970)
Proposed site layout for a 500 MW reactor at Scottish Rocks (c.1970) Scottish Rocks NPP.png
Proposed site layout for a 500 MW reactor at Scottish Rocks (c.1970)

The abandonment of the proposal

Part of the Murrays Beach car park in 2020. The car park occupies part of the site cleared for the nuclear power station. Part of Murrays Beach Carpark December 2020.jpg
Part of the Murrays Beach car park in 2020. The car park occupies part of the site cleared for the nuclear power station.

Before this recommendation was made, there was a change of prime minister, although not of government. John Gorton had been a supporter of the project. In March 1971, Gorton was replaced as prime minister by William McMahon. McMahon opposed the nuclear power program, and the project was deferred for a year, citing financial constraints – Treasury prepared the first comprehensive comparative cost analysis in 1971 and concluded that nuclear was going to be far more expensive than a conventional coal plant. [5] [6] [7]

Following the discovery of natural gas and oil in Bass Strait, and the development of economic coal resources, most of the energy security incentive had evaporated. Tenders were re-called, only to be again deferred and in practical terms cancelled in June 1971. Organisations like the World Union for Protection of Life, the Ecology Action and the Society for Responsibility in Science had reported about the dangers connected with the nuclear power plant. [8]

Some land clearing was done in preparation for the construction, and concrete footings were installed. The footings are visible to this day.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jervis Bay Territory</span> Territory in Australia

The Jervis Bay Territory is an internal territory of Australia. It was established in 1915, from a part of New South Wales (NSW), in order to give the landlocked Australian Capital Territory (ACT) access to the sea.

Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) is a Canadian Crown corporation and the largest nuclear science and technology laboratory in Canada. AECL developed the CANDU reactor technology starting in the 1950s, and in October 2011 licensed this technology to Candu Energy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Australian Atomic Energy Commission</span>

The Australian Atomic Energy Commission (AAEC) was a statutory body of the Australian Government devoted to nuclear science, engineering and research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant</span> Nuclear power plant in Maryland, US

The Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (CCNPP) is a nuclear power plant located on the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay near Lusby, Calvert County, Maryland, in the Mid-Atlantic United States. It is the only nuclear power plant in the state of Maryland.

Nuclear Power Demonstration was the first Canadian nuclear power reactor, and the prototype for the CANDU reactor design. Built by Canadian General Electric, in partnership with Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) and the Hydro Electric Power Commission of Ontario it consisted of a single 22 MWe pressurized heavy water reactor (PHWR) unit located in Rolphton, Ontario, not far from AECL's Chalk River Laboratories. NPD was owned by AECL and operated by Ontario Hydro.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant</span> Nuclear power plant in Guangdong, China

Daya Nuclear Power Plant is a nuclear power plant located in Daya Bay in Longgang District, along the eastern extremity of Shenzhen, Guangdong, China; and to the north east of Hong Kong. Daya Bay has two 944 MWe PWR nuclear reactors based on the Framatome ANP French 900 MWe three cooling loop design (M310), were both commissioned in 1993 and started commercial operation in 1993 and 1994 respectively.

Nuclear decommissioning is the process leading to the irreversible complete or partial closure of a nuclear facility, usually a nuclear reactor, with the ultimate aim at termination of the operating licence. The process usually runs according to a decommissioning plan, including the whole or partial dismantling and decontamination of the facility, ideally resulting in restoration of the environment up to greenfield status. The decommissioning plan is fulfilled when the approved end state of the facility has been reached.

In Pakistan, nuclear power is provided by six commercial nuclear power plants with a net capacity of 3,262 megawatts (3.262 GW) from pressurized water reactors. In 2020, Pakistan's nuclear power plants produced a total of 133 terawatt-hours of electricity, which accounted for roughly 10% of the nation's total electric energy generation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hallam Nuclear Power Facility</span> Decommissioned nuclear power plant in Nebraska

The Hallam Nuclear Power Facility (HNPF) in Nebraska was a 75 MWe sodium-cooled graphite-moderated nuclear power plant built by Atomics International and operated by Consumers Public Power District of Nebraska. It was built in tandem with and co-located with a conventional coal-fired power station, the Sheldon Power Station. The facility featured a shared turbo generator that could accept steam from either heat source, and a shared control room.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Armenian Nuclear Power Plant</span> Nuclear power plant near Yerevan, Armenia

The Armenian Nuclear Power Plant (ANPP), also known as the Metsamor Nuclear Power Plant, is the only nuclear power plant in the South Caucasus, located 36 kilometers west of Yerevan in Armenia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear power in the Czech Republic</span>

The Czech Republic operates two nuclear power plants: Temelín and Dukovany. As of 2019 the government intends to increase the share of nuclear electricity production from 30 % to 58 %. To this end, a new reactor is to be constructed at the Dukovany site, which will replace older units by 2035. New capacities are also expected to be added at the Temelín site.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant</span> Nuclear power plant in Obninsk, Russia (operates 1954–2002)

Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant was built in the "Science City" of Obninsk, Kaluga Oblast, about 110 km (68 mi) southwest of Moscow, Soviet Union. Connected to the power grid in June 1954, Obninsk was the first grid-connected nuclear power plant in the world, i.e. the first nuclear reactor that produced electricity industrially, albeit at small scale. It was located at the Institute of Physics and Power Engineering. The plant is also known as APS-1 Obninsk. It remained in operation between 1954 and 2002. Its production of electricity for the grid ceased in 2002; thereafter it functioned as a research and isotope production plant only.

Nuclear power is the fifth-largest source of electricity in India after coal, gas, hydroelectricity and wind power. As of November 2020, India has 23 nuclear reactors in operation in 8 nuclear power plants, with a total installed capacity of 7,380 MW. Nuclear power produced a total of 43 TWh in 2020–21, contributing 3.11% of total power generation in India. 10 more reactors are under construction with a combined generation capacity of 8,000 MW.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-nuclear movement in Australia</span>

Nuclear weapons testing, uranium mining and export, and nuclear power have often been the subject of public debate in Australia, and the anti-nuclear movement in Australia has a long history. Its origins date back to the 1972–1973 debate over French nuclear testing in the Pacific and the 1976–1977 debate about uranium mining in Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear power in Australia</span>

Nuclear power in Australia has been a topic of debate since the 1930s. Australia has one nuclear reactor at Lucas Heights, New South Wales, although it is only used to produce radionuclides for nuclear medicine, and does not produce electricity. Australia hosts 33% of the world's proven uranium deposits, and is currently the world's third largest producer of uranium after Kazakhstan and Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philip Baxter</span> British chemical engineer

Sir John Philip Baxter was a British-Australian chemical engineer. He was the second director of the University of New South Wales from 1953, continuing as vice-chancellor when the position's title was changed in 1955. Under his administration, the university grew from its technical college roots into the "fastest growing and most rapidly diversifying tertiary institution in Australia". Philip Baxter College is named in his honour.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Small modular reactor</span> Small nuclear reactors that could be manufactured in a factory and transported on site

Small modular reactors (SMRs) are a class of small nuclear fission reactors, designed to be built in a factory, shipped to operational sites for installation and then used to power buildings or other commercial operations. The term SMR refers to the size, capacity and modular construction. Reactor type and the nuclear processes may vary. Of the many SMR designs, the pressurized water reactor (PWR) is the most common. However, recently proposed SMR designs include: generation IV, thermal-neutron reactors, fast-neutron reactors, molten salt, and gas-cooled reactor models. Commercial SMRs have been designed to deliver an electrical power output as low as 5 MWe (electric) and up to 300 MWe per module. SMRs may also be designed purely for desalinization or facility heating rather than electricity. These SMRs are measured in megawatts thermal MWt. Many SMR designs rely on a modular system, allowing customers to simply add modules to achieve a desired electrical output.

Nuclear energy in Portugal is very limited and strictly non-commercial. Portugal has one 1MW research reactor located in the National Nuclear Research Centre at Sacavém, which is in permanent shutdown state. Further nuclear energy activities are not planned in the near future. Other nuclear activities include medical applications such as radiology, radiotherapy and nuclear medicine, as well as use of industrial radioactive sources.

Slovakia has five operational nuclear reactors, with a combined net power capacity of 2,308 MWe, with a sixth coming on line shortly. Within the EU, Slovakia is one of the pro-nuclear Visegrád Group nations.

Currently, Turkey has no operating commercial nuclear reactors. However, four VVER-1200 reactors at the Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant, are currently under construction and expected to come online in October 2024. The government is aiming for 20 GW of nuclear.

References

  1. Cawte, Alice (1992), Atomic Australia : 1944-1990, NSW University Press, ISBN   978-0-86840-388-5, OCLC   647065941
  2. Holland, Ian (2003). "Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel Management in Australia". Chronology. Department of the Parliamentary Library. p. 9. No. 1 2003–04.
  3. "ParlInfo - Radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel management in Australia". parlinfo.aph.gov.au. Retrieved 27 May 2019.
  4. Alder, Keith (1996). Australia's Uranium Opportunities. Sydney: Pauline Alder. ISBN   0-646-29942-5. OCLC   38410139.
  5. Hancock, Ian (2002). John Gorton: He Did It His Way. Hodder. ISBN   0-7336-1439-6. OCLC   49763995.
  6. "Gorton gave nod to nuclear power plant". The Age. 1 January 2000.
  7. "Classic stoush the sub-text to nuclear plan". The Canberra Times. 1 January 2000.
  8. "Letter from Harry F. Kurth, World Union for Protection of Life". The Joshua Lederberg Papers. National Library of Medicine. 8 April 1972.

Further reading