Mexican pronghorn

Last updated

Mexican pronghorn
Mexican pronghorn TX.png
Male in Brewster County, Texas
Status TNC T4.svg
Apparently Secure  (NatureServe) [1]
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Artiodactyla
Family: Antilocapridae
Genus: Antilocapra
Species:
Subspecies:
A. a. mexicana
Trinomial name
Antilocapra americana mexicana
Merriam, 1901

The Mexican pronghorn (Antilocapra americana mexicana) is a pronghorn subspecies which inhabits in Mexico and the United States. It was historically found from Hidalgo and the State of Mexico to the Southwestern United States and Western Texas, but has been reduced from most of its previous range. This subspecies is endangered and is threatened by illegal hunting, overgazing, and habitat loss.

Contents

Terminology

Pedro de Castañeda was one of the earliest Europeans to encounter the pronghorn and the first to describe the animal. He found the artiodactyl in Chichilticale, southeastern Arizona, and referred to the animals as cabras montesas (mountain goats). [2] [3]

The modern term in Mexico, berrendo, originates from a loan word derived from a Celtic language. [4] This word refers to a spotted fur colour of ruminants. [5]

Taxonomy

The Mexican pronghorn is the second of five pronghorn subspecies to be described and was named by Clinton Hart Merriam in 1901.

Evolution

The ancestors of the antilocaprids diverged from the ancestors of the giraffids in the Early Miocene; the okapi and the giraffe are the closest living relatives of the Mexican pronghorn apart from other pronghorns. [6] The sister genus of Antilocapra is the extinct genus Texoceros , with which they form the tribe Antilocaprini. Texoceros first occurs in the late Hemphillian and disappears by the Blancan age. [7] The modern pronghorn first appears in the Early Pleistocene. Due to the occurence of Texoceros and the related antilocaprid Subantilocapra garciae in central Mexico, it is speculated that early evolution of the modern pronghorn took place there. [8]

The earliest potential pronghorn fossils in Mexico come from the Tehuacán Valley and date from the Late Pleistocene. It is unclear if these are referrable to the modern pronghorn or an extinct form, though the author of the fossil's description suggests they are more likely belong to the modern pronghorn. [9] The first remains of pronghorn in Mexico date in between the Late Pleistocene and Holocene and were located in Jimenez Cave, Chihuahua. [10]

Range

The Mexican pronghorn is mostly found in the Chihuahuan Desert Rock outcrops seen from Chihuahuan Desert exhibit.JPG
The Mexican pronghorn is mostly found in the Chihuahuan Desert

In the United States, this subspecies has small populations in New Mexico and Texas (Brewster County), and historically ranged into southeastern Arizona. [11] The Mexican pronghorn is one of three subspecies of pronghorn native to Mexico. [12] Within Mexico, Mexican pronghorn are found to the east of northeastern Sonora and range throughout the rest of the species range in the country. [13] Southwards, Mexican pronghorns were found in eastern Hidalgo and northern State of Mexico. [14]

Mexican pronghorns are typically found in desert grasslands. Most of their habitat has been decreased to the Chihuahuan Desert of northern Mexico. [15]

Reintroduction

With the Mexican pronghorn being an endangered species due to habitat destruction, overgrazing, poaching, and fencing of ranches, efforts have been made to reintroduce them into Mexico. Human intervention may be necessary, such as growing seedlings and transplants of the flora the animals survive on. In Coahuila, it was determined the animals browse mainly on forbs. [16] Further things that can be done to help the reintroduction of this subspecies include setting up clean, reliable water stations (which serve to benefit all area wildlife), reducing the amount of grazing by livestock, and minimizing fence use. Temporary bans on hunting/killing pronghorn will be necessary, until populations stabilize sufficiently.

Conservation

After reintroduction of the Mexican pronghorn, the next step is to start the conservation process. Historically, poaching was one of the factors that led them to become endangered. Only when the population is self-sustaining and thriving, can establishment of a hunting season (by permit) be considered for practical conservation. Unfortunately pronghorn numbers aren't anywhere near, for example, those of white-tailed deer or mule deer, so this concept is still rather in its infancy. Once sustainable herds are re-established, management plans can be implemented by the states where the animals are found. This allows a “survival-of-the-fittest” approach to aid in the population's genetic variability, as well as money going to the state. Other ways are contributing money and service to conservation organizations like the National Wildlife Federation.

References

  1. "NatureServe Explorer 2.0". explorer.natureserve.org.
  2. Seymour, Deni J. (2025). "A Multi-evidential Approach to Locating Chichilticale of the 1539–1542 Coronado Expedition". American Antiquity. 90 (1): 32–69. doi:10.1017/aaq.2024.41. ISSN   0002-7316.
  3. White, Richard S. (2022-12-09). "The American Pronghorn and its Ancient Relatives - The Mammoth Site" . Retrieved 2025-08-02.
  4. Corominas, John (1956-01-01). "New Information on Hispano-Celtic from the Spanish Etymological Dictionary". Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie (in German). 25 (1): 30–58. doi:10.1515/zcph.1956.25.1.30. ISSN   1865-889X.
  5. González-Cano, Rafael; Gonzalez-Martinez, Ana; Muñoz-Mejias, Maria Eva; Valera, Pablo; Rodero, Evangelina (2022-03-01). "Removal of undesirable MC1R gene alleles from 'Berrenda en Negro', an endangered Spanish cattle breed, to enhance breed conservation programs". Livestock Science. 257: 104844. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104844. ISSN   1871-1413.
  6. Chen, L.; Qiu, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, K. (2019). "Large-scale ruminant genome sequencing provides insights into their evolution and distinct traits". Science. 364 (6446): eaav6202. Bibcode:2019Sci...364.6202C. doi: 10.1126/science.aav6202 . PMID   31221828.
  7. Lucas, Spencer G.; Estep, John W.; Williamson, Thomas E.; Morgan, Gary S. (1997). New Mexico's Fossil Record 1: Bulletin 11. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science. p. 108.
  8. Carranza-Castañeda, Oscar; Jiménez-Hidalgo, Eduardo (2021-12-01). "Pliocene Antilocapridae (Mammalia: Artiodactyla) from San Miguel de Allende, Guanajuato, central Mexico". Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 112: 103571. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103571. ISSN   0895-9811.
  9. Coe, Michael D. (1969-08-01). Byers, Douglas S. (ed.). "The Prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley. Vol. I: Environment and Subsistence. Vol. II: The Non-Ceramic Artifacts". Hispanic American Historical Review. 49 (3): 520–522. doi:10.1215/00182168-49.3.520. ISSN   0018-2168.
  10. Messing, Henry J. (1986). "A Late Pleistocene-Holocene Fauna from Chihuahua, Mexico". The Southwestern Naturalist. 31 (3): 277–288. doi:10.2307/3671832. ISSN   0038-4909.
  11. Turbak, Gary (1995). "The Other Antelope". Pronghorn : portrait of the American antelope. Flagstaff, Arizona: Northland Publishing. pp. 126–127. ISBN   978-0-87-358595-8.
  12. Ceballos, Gerardo (2014-01-15). Mammals of Mexico. JHU Press. p. 599. ISBN   978-1-4214-0879-8.
  13. Valdez, Raul; Ortega-Santos, José Alfonso (2019-01-23). Wildlife Ecology and Management in Mexico. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN   978-1-62349-723-1.
  14. García, Manuel Edmundo. Charlas de cacería (in Spanish). 1972. p. 67.
  15. Pool, Duane B.; Panjabi, Arvind O.; Macias-Duarte, Alberto; Solhjem, Deanna M. (2014-02-01). "Rapid expansion of croplands in Chihuahua, Mexico threatens declining North American grassland bird species". Biological Conservation. 170: 274–281. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.019. ISSN   0006-3207.
  16. M.A. Martinez, R.E.P. Miranda, S.J.I. Uvalle, R.R. Aranda, S. Chakeredza, U. Meulen. "Monitoring a Pronghorn (Antilocapra americana mexicana) Population Reintroduced to the North-East of Mexico." Journal of Agriculture in the Tropics and Subtropics (Archives: 2000 - 2002/1). 101(2), 141-161.