Moduli of algebraic curves

Last updated

In algebraic geometry, a moduli space of (algebraic) curves is a geometric space (typically a scheme or an algebraic stack) whose points represent isomorphism classes of algebraic curves. It is thus a special case of a moduli space. Depending on the restrictions applied to the classes of algebraic curves considered, the corresponding moduli problem and the moduli space is different. One also distinguishes between fine and coarse moduli spaces for the same moduli problem.

Contents

The most basic problem is that of moduli of smooth complete curves of a fixed genus. Over the field of complex numbers these correspond precisely to compact Riemann surfaces of the given genus, for which Bernhard Riemann proved the first results about moduli spaces, in particular their dimensions ("number of parameters on which the complex structure depends").

Moduli stacks of stable curves

The moduli stack classifies families of smooth projective curves, together with their isomorphisms. When , this stack may be compactified by adding new "boundary" points which correspond to stable nodal curves (together with their isomorphisms). A curve is stable if it is complete, connected, has no singularities other than double points, and has only a finite group of automorphisms. The resulting stack is denoted . Both moduli stacks carry universal families of curves.

Both stacks above have dimension ; hence a stable nodal curve can be completely specified by choosing the values of parameters, when . In lower genus, one must account for the presence of smooth families of automorphisms, by subtracting their number. There is exactly one complex curve of genus zero, the Riemann sphere, and its group of isomorphisms is PGL(2). Hence the dimension of is equal to

Likewise, in genus 1, there is a one-dimensional space of curves, but every such curve has a one-dimensional group of automorphisms. Hence, the stack has dimension 0.

Construction and irreducibility

It is a non-trivial theorem, proved by Pierre Deligne and David Mumford, [1] that the moduli stack is irreducible, meaning it cannot be expressed as the union of two proper substacks. They prove this by analyzing the locus of stable curves in the Hilbert scheme of tri-canonically embedded curves (from the embedding of the very ample for every curve) which have Hilbert polynomial . Then, the stack is a construction of the moduli space . Using deformation theory, Deligne and Mumford show this stack is smooth and use the stack of isomorphisms between stable curves , to show that has finite stabilizers, hence it is a Deligne–Mumford stack. Moreover, they find a stratification of as

,

where is the subscheme of smooth stable curves and is an irreducible component of . They analyze the components of (as a GIT quotient). If there existed multiple components of , none of them would be complete. Also, any component of must contain non-singular curves. Consequently, the singular locus is connected, hence it is contained in a single component of . Furthermore, because every component intersects , all components must be contained in a single component, hence the coarse space is irreducible. From the general theory of algebraic stacks, this implies the stack quotient is irreducible.

Properness

Properness, or compactness for orbifolds, follows from a theorem on stable reduction on curves. [1] This can be found using a theorem of Grothendieck regarding the stable reduction of Abelian varieties, and showing its equivalence to the stable reduction of curves. [1] section 5.2

Coarse moduli spaces

One can also consider the coarse moduli spaces representing isomorphism classes of smooth or stable curves. These coarse moduli spaces were actually studied before the notion of moduli stack was introduced. In fact, the idea of a moduli stack was introduced by Deligne and Mumford in an attempt to prove the projectivity of the coarse moduli spaces. In recent years, it has become apparent that the stack of curves is actually the more fundamental object.

The coarse moduli spaces have the same dimension as the stacks when ; however, in genus zero the coarse moduli space has dimension zero, and in genus one, it has dimension one.

Examples of low genus moduli spaces

Genus 0

Determining the geometry of the moduli space of genus curves can be established using deformation Theory. The number of moduli for a genus curve, e.g. , is given by the cohomology group

With Serre duality this cohomology group is isomorphic to

for the dualizing sheaf . But, using Riemann–Roch shows the degree of the canonical bundle is , so the degree of is , hence there are no global sections, meaning

showing there are no deformations of genus curves. This proves is just a single point, and the only genus curves is given by . The only technical difficulty is the automorphism group of is the algebraic group , which rigidifies once three points [2] on are fixed, so most authors take to mean .

Genus 1

The genus 1 case is one of the first well-understood cases of moduli spaces, at least over the complex numbers, because isomorphism classes of elliptic curves are classified by the J-invariant

where . Topologically, is just the affine line, but it can be compactified to a stack with underlying topological space by adding a stable curve at infinity. This is an elliptic curve with a single cusp. The construction of the general case over was originally completed by Deligne and Rapoport. [3]

Note that most authors consider the case of genus one curves with one marked point as the origin of the group since otherwise the stabilizer group in a hypothetical moduli space would have stabilizer group at the point given by the curve, since elliptic curves have an Abelian group structure. This adds unneeded technical complexity to this hypothetical moduli space. On the other hand, is a smooth Deligne–Mumford stack.

Genus 2

Affine parameter space

In genus 2 it is a classical result that all such curves are hyperelliptic, [4] pg 298 so the moduli space can be determined completely from the branch locus of the curve using the Riemann–Hurwitz formula. Since an arbitrary genus 2 curve is given by a polynomial of the form

for some uniquely defined , the parameter space for such curves is given by

where corresponds to the locus . [5]

Weighted projective space

Using a weighted projective space and the Riemann–Hurwitz formula, a hyperelliptic curve can be described as a polynomial of the form [6]

where are parameters for sections of . Then, the locus of sections which contain no triple root contains every curve represented by a point .

Genus 3

This is the first moduli space of curves which has both a hyperelliptic locus and a non-hyperelliptic locus. [7] [8] The non-hyperelliptic curves are all given by plane curves of degree 4 (using the genus degree formula), which are parameterized by the smooth locus in the Hilbert scheme of hypersurfaces

.

Then, the moduli space is stratified by the substacks

.

Birational geometry

Unirationality conjecture

In all of the previous cases, the moduli spaces can be found to be unirational, meaning there exists a dominant rational morphism

and it was long expected this would be true in all genera. In fact, Severi had proved this to be true for genera up to . [9] Although, it turns out that for genus [10] [11] [12] all such moduli spaces are of general type, meaning they are not unirational. They accomplished this by studying the Kodaira dimension of the coarse moduli spaces

and found for . In fact, for ,

and hence is of general type.

Geometric implication

This is significant geometrically because it implies any linear system on a ruled variety cannot contain the universal curve . [13]

Stratification of boundary

The moduli space has a natural stratification on the boundary whose points represent singular genus curves. [14] It decomposes into strata

,

where

The curves lying above these loci correspond to

Stratification for genus 2

For the genus case, there is a stratification given by

.

Further analysis of these strata can be used to give the generators of the Chow ring [14] proposition 9.1.

Moduli of marked curves

One can also enrich the problem by considering the moduli stack of genus g nodal curves with n marked points, pairwise distinct and distinct from the nodes. Such marked curves are said to be stable if the subgroup of curve automorphisms which fix the marked points is finite. The resulting moduli stacks of smooth (or stable) genus g curves with n marked points are denoted (or ), and have dimension .

A case of particular interest is the moduli stack of genus 1 curves with one marked point. This is the stack of elliptic curves. Level 1 modular forms are sections of line bundles on this stack, and level N modular forms are sections of line bundles on the stack of elliptic curves with level N structure (roughly a marking of the points of order N).

Boundary geometry

An important property of the compactified moduli spaces is that their boundary can be described in terms of moduli spaces for genera . Given a marked, stable, nodal curve one can associate its dual graph, a graph with vertices labelled by nonnegative integers and allowed to have loops, multiple edges and also numbered half-edges. Here the vertices of the graph correspond to irreducible components of the nodal curve, the labelling of a vertex is the arithmetic genus of the corresponding component, edges correspond to nodes of the curve and the half-edges correspond to the markings. The closure of the locus of curves with a given dual graph in is isomorphic to the stack quotient of a product of compactified moduli spaces of curves by a finite group. In the product the factor corresponding to a vertex v has genus gv taken from the labelling and number of markings equal to the number of outgoing edges and half-edges at v. The total genus g is the sum of the gv plus the number of closed cycles in the graph.

Stable curves whose dual graph contains a vertex labelled by (hence all other vertices have and the graph is a tree) are called "rational tail" and their moduli space is denoted . Stable curves whose dual graph is a tree are called "compact type" (because the Jacobian is compact) and their moduli space is denoted . [2]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Algebraic variety</span> Mathematical object studied in the field of algebraic geometry

Algebraic varieties are the central objects of study in algebraic geometry, a sub-field of mathematics. Classically, an algebraic variety is defined as the set of solutions of a system of polynomial equations over the real or complex numbers. Modern definitions generalize this concept in several different ways, while attempting to preserve the geometric intuition behind the original definition.

In mathematics, in particular algebraic geometry, a moduli space is a geometric space whose points represent algebro-geometric objects of some fixed kind, or isomorphism classes of such objects. Such spaces frequently arise as solutions to classification problems: If one can show that a collection of interesting objects can be given the structure of a geometric space, then one can parametrize such objects by introducing coordinates on the resulting space. In this context, the term "modulus" is used synonymously with "parameter"; moduli spaces were first understood as spaces of parameters rather than as spaces of objects. A variant of moduli spaces is formal moduli. Bernhard Riemann first used the term "moduli" in 1857.

In mathematics, an algebraic stack is a vast generalization of algebraic spaces, or schemes, which are foundational for studying moduli theory. Many moduli spaces are constructed using techniques specific to algebraic stacks, such as Artin's representability theorem, which is used to construct the moduli space of pointed algebraic curves and the moduli stack of elliptic curves. Originally, they were introduced by Grothendieck to keep track of automorphisms on moduli spaces, a technique which allows for treating these moduli spaces as if their underlying schemes or algebraic spaces are smooth. But, through many generalizations the notion of algebraic stacks was finally discovered by Michael Artin.

In mathematics, a gerbe is a construct in homological algebra and topology. Gerbes were introduced by Jean Giraud following ideas of Alexandre Grothendieck as a tool for non-commutative cohomology in degree 2. They can be seen as an analogue of fibre bundles where the fibre is the classifying stack of a group. Gerbes provide a convenient, if highly abstract, language for dealing with many types of deformation questions especially in modern algebraic geometry. In addition, special cases of gerbes have been used more recently in differential topology and differential geometry to give alternative descriptions to certain cohomology classes and additional structures attached to them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch theorem</span>

In mathematics, specifically in algebraic geometry, the Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch theorem is a far-reaching result on coherent cohomology. It is a generalisation of the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem, about complex manifolds, which is itself a generalisation of the classical Riemann–Roch theorem for line bundles on compact Riemann surfaces.

In mathematics, specifically in symplectic topology and algebraic geometry, one can construct the moduli space of stable maps, satisfying specified conditions, from Riemann surfaces into a given symplectic manifold. This moduli space is the essence of the Gromov–Witten invariants, which find application in enumerative geometry and type IIA string theory. The idea of stable map was proposed by Maxim Kontsevich around 1992 and published in Kontsevich (1995).

In mathematics, specifically in symplectic topology and algebraic geometry, Gromov–Witten (GW) invariants are rational numbers that, in certain situations, count pseudoholomorphic curves meeting prescribed conditions in a given symplectic manifold. The GW invariants may be packaged as a homology or cohomology class in an appropriate space, or as the deformed cup product of quantum cohomology. These invariants have been used to distinguish symplectic manifolds that were previously indistinguishable. They also play a crucial role in closed type IIA string theory. They are named after Mikhail Gromov and Edward Witten.

In mathematics a stack or 2-sheaf is, roughly speaking, a sheaf that takes values in categories rather than sets. Stacks are used to formalise some of the main constructions of descent theory, and to construct fine moduli stacks when fine moduli spaces do not exist.

In mathematics, a stable vector bundle is a vector bundle that is stable in the sense of geometric invariant theory. Any holomorphic vector bundle may be built from stable ones using Harder–Narasimhan filtration. Stable bundles were defined by David Mumford in Mumford (1963) and later built upon by David Gieseker, Fedor Bogomolov, Thomas Bridgeland and many others.

In algebraic geometry, a stable curve is an algebraic curve that is asymptotically stable in the sense of geometric invariant theory.

In mathematics, the ELSV formula, named after its four authors Torsten Ekedahl, Sergei Lando, Michael Shapiro, Alek Vainshtein, is an equality between a Hurwitz number and an integral over the moduli space of stable curves.

This is a glossary of algebraic geometry.

In algebraic geometry, a quotient stack is a stack that parametrizes equivariant objects. Geometrically, it generalizes a quotient of a scheme or a variety by a group: a quotient variety, say, would be a coarse approximation of a quotient stack.

In algebraic geometry, a Deligne–Mumford stack is a stack F such that

In algebraic geometry, the tautological ring is the subring of the Chow ring of the moduli space of curves generated by tautological classes. These are classes obtained from 1 by pushforward along various morphisms described below. The tautological cohomology ring is the image of the tautological ring under the cycle map.

In algebraic geometry, a level structure on a space X is an extra structure attached to X that shrinks or eliminates the automorphism group of X, by demanding automorphisms to preserve the level structure; attaching a level structure is often phrased as rigidifying the geometry of X.

In mathematics, the moduli stack of elliptic curves, denoted as or , is an algebraic stack over classifying elliptic curves. Note that it is a special case of the moduli stack of algebraic curves . In particular its points with values in some field correspond to elliptic curves over the field, and more generally morphisms from a scheme to it correspond to elliptic curves over . The construction of this space spans over a century because of the various generalizations of elliptic curves as the field has developed. All of these generalizations are contained in .

In algebraic geometry, convexity is a restrictive technical condition for algebraic varieties originally introduced to analyze Kontsevich moduli spaces in quantum cohomology. These moduli spaces are smooth orbifolds whenever the target space is convex. A variety is called convex if the pullback of the tangent bundle to a stable rational curve has globally generated sections. Geometrically this implies the curve is free to move around infinitesimally without any obstruction. Convexity is generally phrased as the technical condition

Abelian varieties are a natural generalization of elliptic curves, including algebraic tori in higher dimensions. Just as elliptic curves have a natural moduli space over characteristic 0 constructed as a quotient of the upper-half plane by the action of , there is an analogous construction for abelian varieties using the Siegel upper half-space and the symplectic group .

In mathematics, mirror symmetry is a conjectural relationship between certain Calabi–Yau manifolds and a constructed "mirror manifold". The conjecture allows one to relate the number of rational curves on a Calabi-Yau manifold to integrals from a family of varieties. In short, this means there is a relation between the number of genus algebraic curves of degree on a Calabi-Yau variety and integrals on a dual variety . These relations were original discovered by Candelas, de la Ossa, Green, and Parkes in a paper studying a generic quintic threefold in as the variety and a construction from the quintic Dwork family giving . Shortly after, Sheldon Katz wrote a summary paper outlining part of their construction and conjectures what the rigorous mathematical interpretation could be.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Deligne, Pierre; Mumford, David (1969). "The irreducibility of the space of curves of given genus". Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS . 36: 75–109. doi:10.1007/BF02684599. S2CID   16482150.
  2. 1 2 Faber, Carel; Pandharipande, Rahul (2011). "Tautological and non-tautological cohomology of the moduli space of curves". arXiv: 1101.5489 [math.AG].
  3. Deligne, P.; Rapoport, M. (1973), Les schémas de modules de courbes elliptiques, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 349, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 143–316, doi:10.1007/bfb0066716, ISBN   978-3-540-06558-6 , URL: http://publications.ias.edu/node/367
  4. Hartshorne, Robin (29 June 2013). Algebraic geometry. New York. ISBN   978-1-4757-3849-0. OCLC   861706007.
  5. Igusa, Jun-Ichi (1960). "Arithmetic Variety of Moduli for Genus Two". Annals of Mathematics . 72 (3): 612–649. doi:10.2307/1970233. ISSN   0003-486X. JSTOR   1970233.
  6. Larson, Eric (2019-04-17). "The integral Chow ring of ". arXiv: 1904.08081 [math.AG].
  7. Girard, Martine; Kohel, David R. (2006), Hess, Florian; Pauli, Sebastian; Pohst, Michael (eds.), "Classification of Genus 3 Curves in Special Strata of the Moduli Space", Algorithmic Number Theory, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, vol. 4076, pp. 346–360, arXiv: math/0603555 , Bibcode:2006math......3555G, doi:10.1007/11792086_25, ISBN   978-3-540-36075-9, MR   2282935, S2CID   15638167
  8. Penev, Nikola; Vakil, Ravi (2015). "The Chow ring of the moduli space of curves of genus six". Algebraic Geometry . 2 (1): 123–136. arXiv: 1307.6614 . doi:10.14231/ag-2015-006. ISSN   2214-2584. MR   3322200. S2CID   54876684.
  9. Severi, Francesco, 1879-1961. (1915). Sulla classificazione delle curve algebriche e sul teorema d'esistenza di Riemann. Tipografia della R. Accademia dei Lincei. OCLC   881814709.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. Eisenbud, David; Harris, Joe (1987). "The Kodaira dimension of the moduli space of curves of genus ?23". Inventiones Mathematicae . 90 (2): 359–387. Bibcode:1987InMat..90..359E. doi:10.1007/bf01388710. ISSN   0020-9910. S2CID   120642775.
  11. Harris, Joe; Mumford, David (1982), "On the Kodaira Dimension of the Moduli Space of Curves", Selected Papers, New York, NY: Springer New York, pp. 171–234, doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4265-7_8, ISBN   978-1-4419-1936-6
  12. Harris, Joe; Mumford, David (1982), "On the Kodaira Dimension of the Moduli Space of Curves", Selected Papers, New York, NY: Springer New York, pp. 171–234, doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4265-7_8, ISBN   978-1-4419-1936-6
  13. Farkas, Gavril (2009). "The global geometry of the moduli space of curves". Algebraic Geometry. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics. Vol. 80. pp. 125–147. doi:10.1090/pspum/080.1/2483934. ISBN   9780821847022. S2CID   8281102.
  14. 1 2 Arithmetic and geometry: papers dedicated to I.R. Shafarevich on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday (PDF). Shafarevich, Igor Rostislavovich, 1923-2017, Artin, Michael, Tate, John Torrence, 1925-2019. Boston: Birkhäuser. 1983. ISBN   978-1-4757-9286-7. OCLC   681426064.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)

Classic references

Books on moduli of curves

Cohomology and intersection theory