Operation Linebacker

Last updated

Operation Linebacker
Part of the Vietnam War
KC-135A refueling Wild Weasel team Oct 1972.jpg
A 388th TFW SAM hunter-killer team refueling on its way to North Vietnam, October 1972
Date9 May – 23 October 1972
Location
Result Both sides claim victory [1] [2] [3]
Belligerents
Flag of the United States.svg United States
Flag of South Vietnam.svg  South Vietnam
Flag of Vietnam.svg North Vietnam
Commanders and leaders
John W. Vogt Jr. [4]
Damon W. Cooper [5]
Nguyen Van Tien[ citation needed ]
Casualties and losses
Flag of the United States.svg 134 aircraft lost
in combat or operational accidents [6]
Flag of South Vietnam.svg 10 aircraft lost[ citation needed ]
North Vietnamese claim: 651 aircraft shot down, 80 warships sunk or damaged [7]
U.S. claim: 63 aircraft shot down
North Vietnamese claim: 49 aircraft shot down [8]

Operation Linebacker was the codename of a U.S. Seventh Air Force and U.S. Navy Task Force 77 air interdiction campaign conducted against North Vietnam from 9 May to 23 October 1972, during the Vietnam War.

Contents

Its purpose was to halt or slow the transportation of supplies and materials for the Nguyen Hue Offensive (known in the West as the Easter Offensive), an invasion of the South Vietnam by the North Vietnamese People's Army of Vietnam (PAVN) that had been launched on 30 March. Linebacker was the first continuous bombing effort conducted against North Vietnam since the end of Operation Rolling Thunder in November 1968.

Nguyen Hue Offensive

At midday on 30 March 1972, 30,000 PAVN troops, supported by regiments of tanks and artillery, rolled southward across the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) that separated the two Vietnams. [9] This three-division force caught the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) and their American allies unprepared. [10] The PAVN force struck the defensive positions of the ARVN 3rd Division and threw it into disarray. ARVN forces then fell back, and a race began between both belligerents to the bridges at Đông Hà and Cam Lộ. [11] :50–63

By 4 April, ARVN officers had patched together a defensive line that held the PAVN at bay, but it was only a temporary respite. [12] Although the conventional attack by the PAVN, which included the extensive use of armor and heavy artillery, riveted the attention of the allies on the northern provinces, it was only the first of three such operations that were launched that spring. On 5 April, a PAVN force of 20,000 crossed the border from their sanctuaries in Cambodia in another three-division, combined arms force to attack Bình Long Province, north of Saigon. [13] They quickly seized the town of Lộc Ninh and then surrounded the town of An Lộc, cutting the road to the capital. [14]

On 12 April, the PAVN struck again, this time moving in from eastern Laos and seizing a series of border outposts around Đắk Tô in Kon Tum Province in the Central Highlands. [15] The PAVN then proceeded east toward the provincial capital of Kon Tum. Hanoi had initiated the offensive to coincide with the winter monsoon, when continuous rain and low cloud cover made air support difficult. [16]

The initial U.S. response to the offensive was lackadaisical and confused. [17] The Pentagon was not unduly alarmed and the U.S. Ambassador to South Vietnam and Commander, U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, General Creighton W. Abrams, were both out of the country. President Richard M. Nixon's first response was to consider a three-day attack by Boeing B-52 Stratofortress heavy bombers on Hanoi and the port city of Haiphong. His National Security Advisor, Dr. Henry Kissinger, convinced Nixon to reconsider, since he did not want to jeopardize the formalization of the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT I) with the Soviet Union, that was due to be signed in May. [18] Another stumbling block to the plan was Abrams' desire to utilize the available bombers (with their all-weather capability) to support the ARVN defense. [19]

Nixon and Kissinger considered a plan offered by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to be both unimaginative and lacking in aggression. [20] On 4 April, Nixon authorized the bombing of North Vietnam (which had been limited to reprisal raids just above the DMZ) up to the 18th parallel. [21] To prevent a total ARVN collapse and to protect American prestige during the upcoming summit meeting with Soviet general secretary Leonid Brezhnev, Nixon decided to risk a massive escalation of force. [22]

Due to the continuous withdrawal of American forces as part of the policy of Vietnamization, at the time of the invasion fewer than 10,000 U.S. combat troops remained in South Vietnam, and most of them were scheduled to leave within the next six months. [23] The number of combat aircraft stationed in Southeast Asia was less than half that of its peak strength in 1968–1969. At the beginning of 1972, the U.S. Air Force (USAF) had only three squadrons of McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II fighter-bombers and one squadron of Cessna A-37 Dragonfly light attack aircraft, a total of 76 aircraft, stationed in South Vietnam. [24] Another 114 fighter-bombers were located at bases in Thailand. 83 B-52s were stationed at U-Tapao RTAFB, Thailand and at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam. [25] The U.S. Navy (USN)'s Task Force 77 (stationed in the Gulf of Tonkin), had four aircraft carriers assigned to it, but only two were available at any one time to conduct operations. Their air wings had approximately 140 aircraft. [26]

Build-up and air attacks

American and Republic of Vietnam Air Force (RVNAF) aircraft had been supporting the defense (weather permitting) since the beginning of the offensive. These strikes were conducted in support of ARVN forces, and included those of the air wings of the carriers USS Coral Sea and USS Hancock. The bad weather limited the ability of the U.S. aircraft to assist in stemming the North Vietnamese onslaught. By 6 April, at naval and air bases around the globe, American forces were put on alert and ships and aircraft squadrons began moving toward Southeast Asia. [27]

The U.S. began a rapid build-up of airpower. The USAF deployed 176 F-4s and 12 F-105 Thunderchiefs from bases in the Republic of Korea and the U.S. to Thailand between 1 April and 11 May in Operation Constant Guard. [28] Strategic Air Command (SAC) dispatched 124 B-52s from the U.S. to Guam bringing the total B-52 strength available for operations to 209. [29] The USN cut short its port period for the carriers USS Kitty Hawk and USS Constellation and ordered USS Midway, USS America and USS Saratoga to augment the fleet so that four or more carrier air wings could conduct missions simultaneously. 7th Fleet assets in local waters were thereby increased from 84 to 138 ships. [20]

USAF tactical strikes against North Vietnam north of the 20th parallel were authorized on 5 April under the nickname Freedom Train. [21] The first mass B-52 raid directed against the north was conducted on 10 April when 12 B-52s, supported by 53 attack aircraft, struck petroleum storage facilities around Vinh. [30] By 12 April, Nixon had informed Kissinger that he had decided on a more comprehensive bombing campaign which would include strikes against both Hanoi and Haiphong. [20]

North Vietnamese anti-aircraft defense weapons North Vietnamese Antiaircraft Weapons.jpg
North Vietnamese anti-aircraft defense weapons

The following day 18 B-52s struck Thanh Hóa's Bai Thuong Air Base. Three more days followed before another strike, this time by another 18 bombers in a pre-dawn attack against an oil tank farm outside Haiphong. They were followed by more than 100 tactical aircraft attacking targets around Hanoi and Haiphong during daylight. [21] Between 6 and 15 April, U.S. aircraft also struck and destroyed the Paul Doumer and Thanh Hóa bridges and the Yên Viên railway marshalling yard. This marked the introduction of laser-guided bombs against strategic targets in North Vietnam. Both bridges had previously been attacked unsuccessfully with conventional bombs and even missiles. The B-52s were then withdrawn from operations in the north and when they returned in June, their missions would be limited to South Vietnam. [31]

By mid-month, nearly all of North Vietnam had been cleared for bombing raids for the first time in over three years. Air Force and Navy commanders and pilots were relieved that Nixon (unlike President Johnson) left the operational planning to local commanders and loosened the targeting restrictions that had hampered Operation Rolling Thunder. [32] Between 1 May and 30 June B-52s, fighter-bombers, and gunships had flown 18,000 sorties against formidable anti-aircraft defenses with the loss of 29 aircraft. [33]

The U.S. also now began what North Vietnamese historians have described as "using devious political and diplomatic schemes...to cut back the amount of aid being supplied to us by socialist nations". [34] On 20 April Kissinger met secretly with Brezhnev in Moscow. Unwilling to jeopardize the normalisation of relations with the West and wary of Washington's growing relationship with Beijing, Brezhnev agreed to apply pressure to Hanoi to end the offensive and negotiate seriously. [35]

Brezhnev then arranged for another secret meeting between Kissinger and Hanoi's lead negotiator Le Duc Tho, to be held on 2 May in Paris. On the day, the two men met for a session that Kissinger later described as "brutal and insulting." [36] The North Vietnamese, sensing victory, were in no mood to make concessions. As a result of this meeting and the fall of Quảng Trị City Nixon was prepared to up the ante, stating that "the bastards have never been bombed like they're going to be bombed this time". [37]

Operation Pocket Money

On 27 April, ARVN defenses in Quảng Trị Province began to collapse. Due to conflicting orders from their high command, ARVN units joined an exodus of refugees heading southwards, abandoning Quảng Trị city. [38] PAVN forces entered the city on the same day as the meeting between Kissinger and Le Duc Tho. The PAVN offensive had become a massive conventional military operation that was being conducted on three fronts simultaneously, involving the equivalent of 15 divisions and 600 tanks. [39] As the North Vietnamese continued to gain ground in three of South Vietnam's four military regions, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff updated their contingency plans (drawn up before the bombing halt of 1968) for the resumption of bombing in the north and recommended it to the President, who approved it on 8 May. [40]

Shortly after his inauguration, Nixon had ordered the preparation of a contingency plan, one that would hopefully bring the Vietnam War to an end. [41] Operation Duck Hook was to include an invasion of the North and included a proposal to mine its major harbors. [42] The plan had been shelved at the time as too extreme but it had not been forgotten. The USN had also been updating its own contingency plans for just such a mining operation since 1965. On 5 May, Nixon ordered the Joint Chiefs to prepare to execute the aerial mining portion of the Duck Hook plan within three days under the operational title Pocket Money. [41]

At precisely 09:00 (local time) on 9 May, six US Navy A-7 Corsair IIs and three A-6 Intruders from the USS Coral Sea flew into Haiphong harbor and dropped thirty-six 1,000-pound (450 kg) Mark-52 and Mark-55 naval mines into its waters. They were protected from attacks by Vietnam People's Air Force (VPAF) MiG fighter aircraft by the guided-missile cruisers Chicago and Long Beach, with several destroyers including the guided-missile destroyer USS Berkeley launching Operation Custom Tailor and by supporting flights of F-4 Phantoms. The reason for the precise timing of the strike became apparent when Nixon simultaneously delivered a televised speech explaining the escalation to the American people: "The only way to stop the killing is to take the weapons of war out of the hands of the international outlaws of North Vietnam.". [43] The mines were activated five days after their delivery to allow any vessels then in port to escape without damage. [40] Over the next three days other US carrier-based aircraft laid 11,000 more mines into North Vietnam's secondary harbors, blockading all maritime commerce for the country. [44]

Before and during Pocket Money, Nixon and Kissinger had worried about the Soviet and Chinese reaction to the escalation. Hours before Nixon's speech announcing the mining, Kissinger had delivered a letter to Soviet ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin which outlined the U.S. plan, but which also made clear Nixon's willingness to proceed with the summit. [45] The next day, Nixon shook the hand of Soviet Foreign Trade Minister Nikolai Patolichev at the White House. Although Moscow and Beijing publicly denounced the American operation, they were not willing to jeopardize their thawing relationship with the U.S. and Hanoi's requests for support and aid from its socialist allies met with only cool responses. [43]

Going north

Operation Linebacker, the code name for the new interdiction campaign, would have four objectives: to isolate North Vietnam from its sources of supply by destroying railroad bridges and rolling stock in and around Hanoi and north-eastwards toward the Chinese frontier; the targeting of primary storage areas and marshalling yards; to destroy storage and transshipment points and to eliminate (or at least damage) the North's air defense system. [46] With nearly 85 percent of North Vietnam's imports (which arrived by sea) blocked by Pocket Money, the administration and the Pentagon believed that this would cut its final lines of communication with its socialist allies. China alone shipped an average of 22,000 tons of supplies a month over two rail lines and eight major roads that linked it with North Vietnam. [41]

VA-195 A-7E bombing the Hai Duong bridge, 10 May 1972 A-7E VA-195 bombing Hai Duong bridge 1972.jpg
VA-195 A-7E bombing the Hải Dương bridge, 10 May 1972

On 10 May Operation Linebacker began with mass bombing operations against North Vietnam by tactical fighter aircraft of the Seventh Air Force and Task Force 77. Their targets included the railroad switching yards at Yên Viên and the Paul Doumer Bridge, on the northern outskirts of Hanoi. [47] A total of 414 sorties were flown on the first day of the operation, 120 by the Air Force and 294 by the Navy and they encountered the heaviest single day of air-to-air combat during the Vietnam War, with 11 VPAF MiGs (four MiG-21s and seven MiG-17s) and two Air Force F-4s shot down. [48] Anti-aircraft artillery and over 100 surface-to-air missile firings also brought down two USN aircraft (one of which was flown by aces Duke Cunningham and William P. Driscoll). [48]

By the end of the month, American aircraft had destroyed 13 bridges along the rail lines running from Hanoi to the Chinese border. Another four were destroyed between the capital and Haiphong, including the notorious Thanh Hóa Bridge. Several more bridges were brought down along the rail line leading to the south toward the DMZ. Targets were then switched to petroleum and oil storage and transportation networks and North Vietnamese airfields. [49] There was an immediate impact on the battlefield in South Vietnam. Shelling by PAVN artillery dropped off by one-half between 9 May and 1 June. This slowdown was not due to an immediate shortage of artillery shells, but rather to a desire to conserve ammunition. U.S. intelligence analysts believed that PAVN had enough stockpiled supplies to sustain their campaigns throughout the autumn. [50]

The intensity of the bombing campaign was reflected by the sharp increase in the number of strike and support sorties flown in Southeast Asia as a whole: from 4,237 for all services, including the RVNAF, during the month preceding the invasion, to 27,745 flown in support of ARVN forces from the beginning of April to the end of June (20,506 of them flown by the Air Force). [51] B-52s provided an additional 1,000 sorties during the same period. [51] The North was feeling the pressure, admitting in the official PAVN history that "between May and June only 30 percent of supplies called for in our plan actually reached the front-line units." [52] In total, 41,653 Linebacker missions dropped 155,548 tons of bombs. [53]

In addition to interdicting the road and rail system of North Vietnam, Linebacker also systematically attacked its air defense system. The VPAF, with approximately 200 interceptors, strongly contested these attacks throughout the campaign. Navy pilots, employing a mutually supporting "loose deuce" tactical formation and many with TOPGUN training, enjoyed a kill ratio of 6:1 in their favor in May and June, such that after that the VPAF rarely engaged them thereafter. [54] In contrast, the USAF experienced a 1:1 kill ratio through the first two months of the campaign, as seven of its eventual 24 Linebacker air-to-air losses occurred without any corresponding VPAF loss in a twelve-day period between 24 June and 5 July. [55] USAF pilots were hampered by use of the outdated "fluid four" tactical formations (a four-plane, two element formation in which only the leader did the shooting and in which the outside wingmen were vulnerable) dictated by service doctrine. Also contributing to the parity was a lack of air combat training against dissimilar aircraft, a deficient early warning system, and ECM pod formations that mandated strict adherence to formation flying. [56] During August the introduction of real-time early warning systems, increased aircrew combat experience and degraded VPAF ground control interception capabilities reversed the trend to a more favorable 4:1 kill ratio. [57]

Linebacker saw several other "firsts". On the opening day of the operation, USN Lieutenant Duke Cunningham and his radar intercept officer, Lieutenant (j.g.) William P. Driscoll became the first U.S. air aces of the Vietnam War when they shot down their fifth MiG. [58] On 28 August, the USAF gained its first ace when Captain Richard S. Ritchie downed his fifth enemy aircraft. Twelve days later, Captain Charles B. DeBellevue (who had been Ritchie's backseater during four of his five victories) downed two more MiGs, bringing his total to six. On 13 October another weapons officer, Captain Jeffrey S. Feinstein, was credited with his fifth MiG, making him the final Air Force ace. [58]

Operation Lion's Den

Although Linebacker was largely carried out by air, naval forces were also deployed to provide counter-battery fire against enemy targets along the coast and other important logistical areas and in support of ground troops. One such operation was Operation Lion's Den, or "The Battle of Haiphong Harbor". On 27 August 1972, Vice Admiral James L. Holloway III took with him his ship, the heavy cruiser USS Newport News, the guided missile cruiser USS Providence, and the destroyers USS Robison and USS Rowan conducted a brief night raid against the North Vietnamese forces protecting the port of Haiphong. After the bombardment, the ships were threatened by four Soviet-built torpedo boats. Joined by two aircraft from the USS Coral Sea, three of the four torpedo boats were sunk. It was one of the few ship-to-ship naval battles of the war. [59] [60]

Paris Peace Talks and conclusion

The stalled offensive in the South and the devastation in North Vietnam had helped to convince Hanoi to return to the bargaining table by early August. [58] The meetings produced new concessions from Hanoi which promised to end the deadlock that had plagued negotiations since their inception in 1968. Gone were Hanoi's demands for the ouster of South Vietnamese President Nguyễn Văn Thiệu and his replacement by a coalition government in which the Viet Cong would participate. [61] The U.S. on its part agreed to a cease fire in place which conceded that PAVN soldiers could remain in South Vietnam after a peace agreement. [62] The diplomatic impasse was broken and Nixon ordered a halt to all bombing above the 20th parallel on 23 October and on 26 October Kissinger announced that "peace is at hand." This once again placed Hanoi and Haiphong off-limits, and halted Linebacker operations. [62]

Air Force historian Earl Tilford has written that Linebacker was "a watershed in aerial warfare...it was the first modern aerial campaign in which precision guided munitions changed the way in which air power was used." [63] It succeeded, where Rolling Thunder had failed, he claimed, for three reasons: Nixon was decisive in his actions and gave the military greater latitude in targeting; American airpower was forcefully and appropriately used; and the immense difference in the technology utilized made Linebacker the first bombing campaign in a "new era" of aerial warfare. [64]

During and immediately following the PAVN offensive, U.S. Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps aviators had flown 18,000 sorties in the four northern provinces of South Vietnam and dropped 40,000 tons of ordnance in the Battle of An Lộc. Between March and May, B-52 sortie rates had climbed from 700 to 2,200 per month and they had dropped 57,000 tons of bombs in Quảng Trị Province alone. [65] During Freedom Train and Linebacker proper, B-52s had dropped 150,237 tons of bombs on the North while Air Force and Navy tactical aircraft had flown 1,216 sorties and dropped another 5,000 tons of ordnance. [66]

From the beginning of Freedom Train in April to the end of June 1972 the United States lost 52 aircraft over North Vietnam: 17 to missiles; 11 to anti-aircraft weapons; three to small arms fire; 14 to MiGs; and seven to unknown causes. [67] During the same time period, the RVNAF lost ten aircraft. [68] 63 VPAF aircraft were destroyed during the same time period. [69] North Vietnam claimed that it had shot down 651 aircraft and sunk or set on fire 80 U.S. warships during the operation. [7]

Linebacker had played a crucial role in blunting the northern offensive by drying up its vital sources of supply. PAVN had evolved into a conventional military force, and such a force depended upon a complex logistical system, which made it vulnerable to aerial attack. [70] By September, imports into North Vietnam were estimated at 35 to 50 percent below what they had been in May, bolstering claims that the campaign had been successful in its interdiction effort. [71] USAF General Robert N. Ginsburgh, of the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, summed up the attitudes of U.S. commanders by remarking that Linebacker had "a greater impact in its first four months of operation than Rolling Thunder had in three and one-half years." [72] Although Kissinger may have announced that peace was at hand, it was not going to come easily. American bombers would once again return to the skies of North Vietnam in 1972 during Operation Linebacker II before the American commitment to the Vietnam War came to an end. [73]

North Vietnamese aircraft losses

(Air-to-air losses only) [74] [75]

DatesService MiG-21 MiG-19 MiG-17 Total
5 April – 9 MayUSAF415
USN224
10 May – 23 OctoberUSAF30737
USN321116
USMC11
VPAF Total40101363

U.S. aircraft losses during Linebacker

Between 10 May and 23 October 1972, the United States lost a total of 134 aircraft either over the north or as a direct result of Linebacker missions. 104 were lost in combat and 30 were destroyed in operational accidents. Losses by service were: [6]

USAF: – 70 total

USN: – 54 total

USMC: – 10 total

U.S. air order of battle

Task Force 77

USS Constellation; 1 October 1971 – 30 June 1972 [77]
Air WingSquadronAircraft Type
CVW-9 VF-92 F-4J Phantom II
VF-96 F-4J Phantom II
VA-146 A-7E Corsair II
VA-147 A-7E Corsair II
VA-165 A-6A & KA-6D Intruder
USS Coral Sea; 12 November 1971 – 17 July 1972 [78]
Air WingSquadronAircraft Type
CVW-15 VF-51 F-4B Phantom II
VF-111 F-4B Phantom II
VA-22 A-7E Corsair II
VA-94 A-7E Corsair II
VMA(AW)-224 A-6A & KA-6D Intruder
USS Hancock; 7 January 1972 to 3 October 1972 [79]
Air WingSquadronAircraft Type
CVW-21 VF-24 F-8J Crusader
VF-211 F-8J Crusader
VA-55 A-4F Skyhawk
VA-164 A-4F Skyhawk
VA-212 A-4F Skyhawk
USS Kitty Hawk; 17 February 1972 to 28 November 1972 [80]
Air WingSquadronAircraft Type
CVW-11 VF-114 F-4J Phantom II
VF-213 F-4J Phantom II
VA-192 A-7E Corsair II
VA-195 A-7E Corsair II
VA-52 A-6A & KA-6D Intruder
USS Midway; 10 April 1972 to 3 March 1973 [81]
Air WingSquadronAircraft Type
CVW-5 VF-151 F-4B Phantom II
VF-161 F-4B Phantom II
VA-56 A-7B Corsair II
VA-93 A-7B Corsair II
VA-115 A-6A & KA-6D Intruder
USS Saratoga; 11 April 1972 to 13 February 1973 [82]
Air WingSquadronAircraft Type
CVW-3 VF-31 F-4J Phantom II
VF-103 F-4J Phantom II
VA-37 A-7A Corsair II
VA-105 A-7A Corsair II
VA-75 A-6A & KA-6D Intruder
USS America; 5 June 1972 to 24 March 1973 [83]
Air WingSquadronAircraft Type
CVW-8 VF-74 F-4J Phantom II
VMFA-333 F-4J Phantom II
VA-82 A-7C Corsair II
VA-86 A-7C Corsair II
VA-35 A-6A & KA-6D Intruder
USS Oriskany; 5 June 1972 to 30 March 1973 [84]
Air WingSquadronAircraft Type
CVW-19 VF-191 F-8J Crusader
VF-194 F-8J Crusader
VA-153 A-7A Corsair II
VA-155 A-7B Corsair II
VA-215 A-7B Corsair II

USMC

1st Marine Aircraft Wing, Marine Aircraft Group 15
BaseSquadronAircraft TypeNotes
: Danang AB, RVN April 1972 to June 1972; [85] Nam Phong RTAB, Thailand June 1972 to August 1973 [86] Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 115 F-4B Phantom IIDeployed from MCAS Iwakuni; 6 April 1972 – 31 August 1973 [87] [85]
Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 212 F-4J Phantom IIDeployed from MCAS Kaneohe Bay; 14 April 1972 – 20 June 1972 [87] [88]
Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 232 F-4J Phantom IIDeployed from MCAS Iwakuni; 6 April 1972 – 1 September 1973 [87] [85]
Marine All-Weather Attack Squadron 533 A-6A IntruderDeployed from MCAS Iwakuni; 21 June 1972 – August 1973 [89]
Marine Aircraft Group 12
BaseSquadronAircraft TypeNotes
Bien Hoa Air Base, RVN [90] Marine Attack Squadron 211 A-4E SkyhawkDeployed from Naha Air Force Base, Okinawa; 17 May 1972 – 30 January 1973 [90]
Marine Attack Squadron 311 A-4E SkyhawkDeployed from MCAS Iwakuni; 17 May 1972 – 30 January 1973 [90]

Seventh Air Force

8th Tactical Fighter Wing, Ubon RTAFB, Thailand [91]
SquadronAircraft TypeNotes
25th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4D Phantom II [92]
433rd Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4D Phantom II [93]
435th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4D Phantom II [94]
497th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4D Phantom II [95]
Constant Guard I
334th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4E Phantom IIDeployed from 4th TFW, Seymour-Johnson AFB, North Carolina; 11 April 1972 – 5 August 1972; 30 September 1972 – 18 March 1973 [96] [97]
336th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4E Phantom IIDeployed from 4th TFW, Seymour-Johnson AFB, North Carolina; 12 April 1972 – 30 September 1972; 9 March 1973 – 7 September 1973 [98] [97]
Temporary Duty (TDY)
335th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4E Phantom IIDeployed from 4th TFW, Seymour-Johnson AFB, North Carolina; 6 July 1972 – 22 December 1972 [99]
49th Tactical Fighter Wing, Takhli RTAFB, Thailand [100] [101]
Constant Guard III
SquadronAircraft TypeNotes
7th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4D Phantom IIDeployed from Holloman AFB, New Mexico; 11 May 1972 – 12 August 1972 [102] [103]
8th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4D Phantom IIDeployed from Holloman AFB, New Mexico; 12 May 1972 – 2 October 1972 [104] [103]
9th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4D Phantom IIDeployed from Holloman AFB, New Mexico; 13 May 1972 – 5 October 1972 [105] [103]
417th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4D Phantom IIDeployed from Holloman AFB, New Mexico; 10 May 1972 – 30 September 1972 [106] [103]
474th Tactical Fighter Wing, Takhli RTAFB, Thailand [107]
Constant Guard V
SquadronAircraft TypeNotes
429th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-111ADeployed from Nellis AFB, Nevada; 26 September 1972
430th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-111ADeployed from Nellis AFB, Nevada; 26 September 1972
56th Special Operations Wing, Nakhon Phanom RTAFB, Thailand [108]
SquadronAircraft TypeNotes
1st Special Operations Squadron A-1 Skyraider [109]
21st Special Operations Squadron CH-53 Sea Stallion [110]
366th Tactical Fighter Wing, Danang AB, RVN; transferred to Takhli RTAFB, Thailand 27 June 1972 [111] [112]
SquadronAircraft TypeNotes
4th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4E Phantom IITransferred to Takhli RTAFB, Thailand; 27 June 1972 [113]
390th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4D Phantom IITransferred to the 347th TFW, Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho; 30 June 1972 [114]
421st Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4E Phantom IITransferred to Takhli RTAFB, Thailand; 27 June 1972 [115]
Commando Fly
35th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4D Phantom IIDeployed from 3rd TFW, Kunsan AB, Korea; 3 April – 12 Jun 1972; Deployed to Korat RTAFB, Thailand, 13 June – 12 Oct 1972 [116] [117]
388th Tactical Fighter Wing, Korat RTAFB, Thailand [118]
SquadronAircraft TypeNotes
34th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4E Phantom II [119]
469th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4E Phantom IIInactivated 31 October 1972 [120]
17th Wild Weasel Squadron F-105G Thunderchief [121]
Constant Guard I
561st Tactical Fighter Squadron F-105G ThunderchiefDeployed from 23rd TFW, McConnell AFB, Kansas; 11 April 1972 – 27 January 1973 [122] [123]
432d Tactical Reconnaissance Wing, Udorn RTAFB, Thailand [124]
SquadronAircraft TypeNotes
13th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4D Phantom II [125]
14th Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron RF-4C Phantom II [126]
555th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4D Phantom II [127]
Commando Flash
523rd Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4D Phantom IIDeployed from 405th TFW, Clark AB, Philippines; 9 April – 24 October 1972 [128] [129]
Constant Guard II
308th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4E Phantom IIDeployed from 31st TFW, Homestead AFB, Florida; 28 April – 29 July 1972 [130] [131]
58th Tactical Fighter Squadron F-4E Phantom IIDeployed from 33d TFW, Eglin AFB, Florida; 29 April – 14 Oct 1972 [132] [131]
43d Strategic Wing, Andersen AFB, Guam [133] [134]
SquadronAircraft TypeNotes
60th Bombardment Squadron (Provisional)B-52D Stratofortress [134]
63rd Bombardment Squadron (Provisional)B-52D Stratofortress [134]
72d Strategic Wing (Provisional), Anderson AFB, Guam
SquadronAircraft TypeNotes
64th Bombardment Squadron (Provisional)B-52G Stratofortress
65th Bombardment Squadron (Provisional)B-52G Stratofortress
329th Bombardment Squadron (Provisional)B-52G Stratofortress
486th Bombardment Squadron (Provisional)B-52G Stratofortress
307th Strategic Wing, U Tapao RTAFB, Thailand [135] [136]
SquadronAircraft TypeNotes
364th Bombardment Squadron B-52D Stratofortress [136]
365th Bombardment Squadron B-52D Stratofortress [136]

See also

Notes

  1. "How Nixon's Operation Linebacker Countered North Vietnam's All-Out Bid to Conquer the South". HistoryNet. 5 April 2022. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
  2. Haun, Phil; Jackson, Colin (2015). "Breaker of Armies: Air Power in the Easter Offensive and the Myth of Linebacker I and II in the Vietnam War". International Security. 40 (3): 139–178. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00226. ISSN   0162-2889. JSTOR   43828564. S2CID   57564546.
  3. Pribbenow, Merle L. (2001). "Rolling Thunder and Linebacker Campaigns: The North Vietnamese View". The Journal of American-East Asian Relations. 10 (3/4): 197–210. doi:10.1163/187656101793645524. ISSN   1058-3947. JSTOR   23613043.
  4. Thompson, p. 257.
  5. Thompson, p. 257.
  6. 1 2 Ed Rasimus (2006). "Appendix I – Linebacker Losses". Palace Cobra: A Fighter Pilot in the Vietnam Air War. St. Martin's Press. ISBN   978-0-312-35356-8., pp. 233–248. Losses are enumerated by date, aircraft type and serial number, and crew members.
  7. 1 2 Van Thai & Van Quang 2002, p. 301.
  8. "Archived copy". old.vko.ru. Archived from the original on 3 February 2014. Retrieved 11 January 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  9. Maj. A.J.C. Lavalle, ed. Airpower and the 1972 Spring Offensive. Maxwell AFB AL: Air University Press, 1976, p. 4.
  10. David Fulghum & Terrance Maitland, et al., South Vietnam on Trial. Boston: Boston Publishing Company, 1984, p. 138.
  11. Melson, Charles (1991). U.S. Marines In Vietnam: The War That Would Not End, 1971–1973. History and Museums Division, Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps. ISBN   9781482384055.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  12. Fulghum and Maitland, p. 141.
  13. Lavalle, p. 6.
  14. Andrade, Dale (1995). Trial by Fire: The 1972 Easter Offensive, America's Last Vietnam Battle. New York: Hippocrene Books. p. 73.
  15. Fulghum and Maitland, pp. 154–158.
  16. Earl H. Tilford, Setup: What the Air Force Did in Vietnam and Why. Maxwell AFB AL: Air University Press, 1991, p. 225.
  17. Fulghum and Maitland, pp. 141–142.
  18. Tilford, p. 234.
  19. Fulghum and Maitland, p. 170.
  20. 1 2 3 Fulghum and Maitland, p. 142.
  21. 1 2 3 Tilford, p. 228.
  22. Tilford, p. 232
  23. Michael Casey, Clark Dougan, Samuel Lipsman, Jack Sweetman, Stephen Weiss, et al., Flags into Battle. Boston: Boston Publishing Company, 1987, p. 182.
  24. Lavalle, p. 12.
  25. Tilford, pp. 223–224.
  26. John Morocco, Rain of Fire. Boston: Boston Publishing Company, 1985, p. 170.
  27. Morrocco, John (1985). Rain of Fire: Air War, 1969–1973 . Boston: Boston Publishing Company. p. 170. ISBN   0-939526-14-X.
  28. Lavalle, pp. 19, 23–25. Also see Morocco, pp. 108–109.
  29. Tilford, p. 224.
  30. Wayne To Hanoi and Back. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 2000, p. 225.
  31. Thompson, p. 229.
  32. Stanley Karnow, Vietnam. New York: Viking, 1983, p. 643.
  33. Casey, Dougan, Lipsman, p. 39.
  34. Van Thai & Van Quang 2002, p. 299.
  35. On 21 February 1972 Nixon had landed in Beijing for his dramatic diplomatic breakthrough with the People's Republic of China. The Chinese, who had previously hoped that a long war in Southeast Asia would bleed both the Americans and their Vietnamese neighbors, now feared that a decline in American power would deprive them of a counterweight to the Soviet Union. Karnow, p. 638.
  36. Fulghum and Maitland, p. 179.
  37. Fulghum and Maitland, p. 168.
  38. Dale Andrade, Trial by Fire. New York: Hippocrene Books, 1995 p. 52.
  39. Dave Richard Palmer, Summons of the Trumpet, New York: Ballentine, 1978, p. 317.
  40. 1 2 Tilford, p. 233.
  41. 1 2 3 Morocco, p. 130.
  42. Fulghum and Maitland, p. 144.
  43. 1 2 Morocco, p. 131.
  44. Andrade, p. 518.
  45. Fulghum and Maitland, pp. 170–171.
  46. William P. Head, War Above the Clouds, Maxwell AFB AL: Air University Press, 2002, p. 65.
  47. Casey, Dougan and Lipsman, p. 39.
  48. 1 2 Thompson, p. 236.
  49. Tilford, p. 235.
  50. Andrade, p. 519.
  51. 1 2 Head, p. 66.
  52. Van Thai & Van Quang 2002, p. 293.
  53. Clodfelter, p. 224.
  54. Morocco, p. 144.
  55. Marshall L. Michel, Clashes: Air Combat Over North Vietnam 1965–1972. Annapolis MD: Naval Institute Press, 1997, p. 244.
  56. Michel, p. 288
  57. Michel. p. 284
  58. 1 2 3 Morocco, p. 145.
  59. Holloway, James L. (2007). Aircraft Carriers at War: A Personal Retrospective of Korea, Vietnam, and the Soviet Confrontation. US Naval Institute Press. ISBN   1-59114-391-8, p. 308
  60. Sherwood, John (2009). Nixon's Trident: Naval Power in Southeast Asia, 1968–1972. Naval Historical Center. pp. 68–9. ISBN   9781505469127.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  61. Lipsman and Weiss, p. 9. See also Karnow, p. 647.
  62. 1 2 "Memoirs v Tapes: President Nixon and the December Bombings". Archived from the original on 12 July 2018. Retrieved 23 June 2015.
  63. Tilford, p. 238.
  64. Tilford, pp. 238–240.
  65. Lavalle, p. 103.
  66. Head, p. 71.
  67. Head, p. 66. One of those aircraft was an EB-66 electronic jamming aircraft with the call sign Bat-21. The EB-66 was shot down over northern South Vietnam on 2 April with only one survivor, Lieutenant Colonel Iceal Hambleton. See Lavalle, pp. 35–43.
  68. Tilford, pp. 231, 251. Linebacker. See also Lavalle, p. 107.
  69. Tilford, p. 245.
  70. Palmer, p. 322.
  71. Tilford, p. 237.
  72. Morocco, p. 136.
  73. Boyne, Linebacker II.
  74. "United States Air Force in Southeast Asia: Aces and Aerial Victories – 1965–1973" (PDF). Air University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 November 2006. Retrieved 15 February 2007., on-line book, pp. 95–102.
  75. Drendel, Lou. (1984). ...And Kill MiGs. Squadron/Signal Publications. ISBN   978-0-89747-056-8.
  76. Michel, p. 317 note 2. An "induced loss" occurred when a MiG was credited with indirectly causing a U.S. aircraft loss, including fuel exhaustion, fratricide, and loss of control while maneuvering.
  77. Francillion, p. 126.
  78. Francillion, p. 131.
  79. Francillion, p. 140.
  80. Francillion, p. 147.
  81. Francillion, p. 150.
  82. Francillion, p. 161.
  83. Francillion, p. 118.
  84. Francillion, p. 155.
  85. 1 2 3 Nicholson, pp. 53–54
  86. Nicholson, pp. 62–63
  87. 1 2 3 Davies, p. 92.
  88. Nicholson, p. 54
  89. Nicholson, p. 63
  90. 1 2 3 Mersky, p. 105
  91. "8th Tactical Fighter Wing".
  92. "25th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  93. "433rd Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  94. "435th Tactical Fighter Squadron". Archived from the original on 22 August 2022. Retrieved 18 November 2019.
  95. "497th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  96. "334th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  97. 1 2 Nicholson, p. 39, p. 44
  98. "336th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  99. "335th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  100. "49th Tactical Fighter Wing".
  101. Nicholson, pp. 49–50
  102. "7th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  103. 1 2 3 4 Nicholson, p. 50
  104. "8th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  105. "9th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  106. "417th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  107. Picinich, A.A., Colonel (21 February 1974). Radzykewycz, D.T., Captain (ed.). "The F-111 In Southeast Asia September 1972 – January 1973". CHECO/CORONA HARVEST Division, DCS/Plans and Operations, HQ PACAF. Project CHECO Report (Special Project). Hq USAF: Department of the Air Force. UNCLASSIFIED.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  108. "56th Special Operations Wing".
  109. "1st Special Operations Squadron".
  110. "21st Special Operations Squadron".
  111. "366th Tactical Fighter Wing".
  112. Nicholson, p. 61
  113. "4th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  114. "390th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  115. "421st Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  116. "35th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  117. Nicholson, pp. 36–37
  118. "388th Tactical Fighter Wing".
  119. "34th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  120. "469th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  121. "17th Wild Weasel Squadron". Air Force Historical Research Agency.
  122. "561st Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  123. Nicholson, p. 40
  124. "432d Tactical Reconnaissance Wing".
  125. "13th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  126. "14th Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron".
  127. "555th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  128. "523rd Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  129. Nicholson, pp. 36–37, p. 46.
  130. "308th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  131. 1 2 Nicholson, pp. 45–46
  132. "58th Tactical Fighter Squadron".
  133. "43rd Strategic Wing".[ permanent dead link ]
  134. 1 2 3 "43rd Bomb Wing - SAC - Andersen AFB - B-52".
  135. "307th Strategic Wing".
  136. 1 2 3 "307th Bombardment Wing - SAC -".

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vietnamization</span> Policy of American withdrawal from South Vietnam near the end of the Vietnam War

Vietnamization was a policy of the Richard Nixon administration to end U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War through a program to "expand, equip, and train South Vietnamese forces and assign to them an ever-increasing combat role, at the same time steadily reducing the number of U.S. combat troops". Brought on by the Viet Cong's Tet Offensive, the policy referred to U.S. combat troops specifically in the ground combat role, but did not reject combat by the U.S. Air Force, as well as the support to South Vietnam, consistent with the policies of U.S. foreign military assistance organizations. U.S. citizens' mistrust of their government that had begun after the offensive worsened with the release of news about U.S. soldiers massacring civilians at My Lai (1968), the invasion of Cambodia (1970), and the leaking of the Pentagon Papers (1971).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation Linebacker II</span> American bombing campaign in the Vietnam war

Operation Linebacker II, sometimes referred to as the Christmas bombings, was a strategic bombing campaign conducted by the United States against targets in North Vietnam from December 18 to December 29, 1972, during the Vietnam War. More than 20,000 tons of ordnance was dropped on military and industrial areas in Hanoi and Haiphong and at least 1,624 civilians were killed. The operation was the final major military operation carried out by the U.S. during the conflict, and the largest bombing campaign involving heavy bombers since World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation Commando Hunt</span> 1968–72 aerial bombing campaign by the United States during the Vietnam War

Operation Commando Hunt was a covert U.S. Seventh Air Force and U.S. Navy Task Force 77 aerial interdiction campaign that took place during the Vietnam War. The operation began on 15 November 1968 and ended on 29 March 1972. The objective of the campaign was to prevent the transit of People's Army of Vietnam (PAVN) personnel and supplies on the logistical corridor known as the Ho Chi Minh Trail that ran from the southwestern Democratic Republic of Vietnam through the southeastern portion of the Kingdom of Laos and into the Republic of Vietnam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Easter Offensive</span> 1972 attempted invasion of South Vietnam by the North during the Vietnam War

The Easter Offensive, also known as the 1972 spring–summer offensive by North Vietnam, or the Red Fiery Summer as romanticized in South Vietnamese literature, was a military campaign conducted by the People's Army of Vietnam against the Army of the Republic of Vietnam and the United States military between 30 March and 22 October 1972, during the Vietnam War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cambodian campaign</span> Invasion of Cambodia by US and South Vietnamese forces (April–July 1970)

The Cambodian campaign was a series of military operations conducted in eastern Cambodia in mid-1970 by South Vietnam and the United States as an expansion of the Vietnam War and the Cambodian Civil War. Thirteen operations were conducted by the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) between April 29 and July 22 and by U.S. forces between May 1 and June 30, 1970.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bien Hoa Air Base</span> Vietnam Peoples Air Force (VPAF) military airfield in South-Central southern Vietnam

Bien Hoa Air Base is a Vietnam People's Air Force (VPAF) military airfield located in South-Central southern Vietnam about 25 km (16 mi) from Ho Chi Minh City, across the Dong Nai river in the northern ward of Tân Phong, and within the city of Biên Hòa within Đồng Nai Province. The boomburb city is densely populated and rings the base, despite significant levels of agent orange toxins simply left there for decades. The base is scheduled to begin cleanup by 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pleiku Air Base</span> Airport

Pleiku Air Base is a former air force base in Vietnam. It was established by the Republic of Vietnam Air Force (RVNAF) in 1962 at an undeveloped airstrip, and was used by the United States Air Force during the Vietnam War in the II Corps Tactical Zone of South Vietnam. It was captured by the People's Army of Vietnam (PAVN) in March 1975 and was abandoned for many years. Today, the facility has just redeveloped as Pleiku Airport。

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phan Rang Air Base</span> Airport in Vietnam

Phan Rang Air Base is a Vietnam People's Air Force (VPAF) (Khong Quan Nhan Dan Viet Nam) military airfield in Vietnam. It is located 5.2 miles north-northwest of Phan Rang – Tháp Chàm in Ninh Thuận Province.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tan Son Nhut Air Base</span> South Vietnamese Air Force base in Saigon during the Vietnam War; now an international airport

Tan Son Nhut Air Base (1955–1975) was a Republic of Vietnam Air Force (RVNAF) facility. It was located near the city of Saigon in southern Vietnam. The United States used it as a major base during the Vietnam War (1959–1975), stationing Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marine units there. Following the Fall of Saigon, it was taken over as a Vietnam People's Air Force (VPAF) facility and remains in use today.

Ubon Royal Thai Air Force Base is a Royal Thai Air Force (RTAF) facility located near the city of Ubon Ratchathani, in Ubon Ratchathani Province. It is approximately 488 km northeast of Bangkok. The Laos border is about 60 kilometres (37 mi) directly east. The facility is also used as a civil airport.

U-Tapao Royal Thai Navy Airfield is a military airfield of the Royal Thai Navy (RTN) approximately 140 kilometres (87 mi) southeast of Bangkok in the Ban Chang District of Rayong Province near Sattahip on the Gulf of Thailand. It is serves as the home of the RTN First Air Wing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1975 spring offensive</span> Final North Vietnamese campaign in the Vietnam War that led to the capitulation of South Vietnam

The 1975 spring offensive, officially known as the general offensive and uprising of spring 1975, was the final North Vietnamese campaign in the Vietnam War that led to the capitulation of Republic of Vietnam. After the initial success capturing Phước Long Province, the North Vietnamese leadership increased the scope of the People's Army of Vietnam's (PAVN) offensive and captured and held the key Central Highlands city of Buôn Ma Thuột between 10 and 18 March. These operations were intended to be preparatory to launching a general offensive in 1976.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation Lam Son 719</span> 1971 Vietnam War military offensive in Laos by the US-backed ARVN

Operation Lam Son 719 or 9th Route – Southern Laos Campaign was a limited-objective offensive campaign conducted in the southeastern portion of the Kingdom of Laos. The campaign was carried out by the armed forces of South Vietnam between 8 February and 25 March 1971, during the Vietnam War. The United States provided logistical, aerial and artillery support for the operation, but its ground forces were prohibited by law from entering Laotian territory. The objective of the campaign was the disruption of a possible future offensive by the People's Army of Vietnam (PAVN), whose logistical system within Laos was known as the Ho Chi Minh Trail.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South Vietnam Air Force</span> Military branch active from 1955 to 1975

The South Vietnam Air Force, officially the Republic of Vietnam Air Force, was the aerial branch of the Republic of Vietnam Military Forces, the official military of the Republic of Vietnam from 1955 to 1975.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Da Nang Air Base</span> Military base in Vietnam

Da Nang Air Base (1930s–1975) was a French Air Force and later Republic of Vietnam Air Force (RVNAF) facility located in the city of Da Nang, Vietnam. During the Vietnam War (1959–1975), it was a major base with United States Army, United States Air Force (USAF), and United States Marine Corps (USMC) units stationed there. Air Vietnam also used the facility from 1951 to 1975 for civilian domestic and international flights within Southeast Asia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1968 in the Vietnam War</span>

The year 1968 saw major developments in the Vietnam War. The military operations started with an attack on a US base by the North Vietnamese People's Army of Vietnam (PAVN) and the Viet Cong (VC) on January 1, ending a truce declared by the Pope and agreed upon by all sides. At the end of January, the PAVN and VC launched the Tet Offensive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1969 in the Vietnam War</span>

The inauguration of Richard Nixon in January led to a reevaluation of the U.S. role in the war. U.S. forces peaked at 543,000 in April. U.S. military strategy remained relatively unchanged from the offensive strategy of 1968 until the Battle of Hamburger Hill in May which led to a change a more reactive approach. The U.S. and South Vietnam agreed on a policy of Vietnamization with South Vietnamese forces being expanded and equipped to take over more of the ground combat from the departing Americans which began to withdraw in late June without any reciprocal commitment by the North Vietnamese. The morale of U.S. ground forces began to fray with increasing racial tensions and the first instances of fragging and combat refusal. The antiwar movement in the U.S. continued to grow and public opinion turned increasingly antiwar when the Mỹ Lai massacre was revealed in November.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1972 in the Vietnam War</span>

1972 in the Vietnam War saw foreign involvement in South Vietnam slowly declining. Three allies, Australia, New Zealand and Thailand, which had each contributed military contingents, left South Vietnam this year. The United States continued to participate in combat, primarily with air power to assist the South Vietnamese, while negotiators in Paris tried to hammer out a peace agreement and withdrawal strategy for the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1973 in the Vietnam War</span> 1973 in the Vietnam War

1973 in the Vietnam War began with a peace agreement, the Paris Peace Accords, signed by the United States and South Vietnam on one side of the Vietnam War and communist North Vietnam and the insurgent Viet Cong on the other. Although honored in some respects, the peace agreement was violated by both North and South Vietnam as the struggle for power and control of territory in South Vietnam continued. North Vietnam released all American prisoners of war and the United States completed its military withdrawal from South Vietnam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phù Cát Air Base</span> Airport

Phù Cát Air Base (1966–1975) was a United States Air Force (USAF) and Republic of Vietnam Air Force (RVNAF) facility used during the Vietnam War (1959–1975). It is located north of the city of Qui Nhơn in southern Vietnam.

References

Published government documents

Secondary sources