Paul A. Engelmayer | |
|---|---|
 Engelmayer in 2017 | |
| Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York | |
| Assumed office July 27, 2011 | |
| Appointed by | Barack Obama |
| Preceded by | Gerard E. Lynch |
| Personal details | |
| Born | April 12,1961 New York City,New York,U.S. |
| Education | Harvard University (AB,JD) |
Paul Adam Engelmayer (born April 12,1961) is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Born and grew up in New York City,Engelmayer attended Harvard College,where he studied Government and was the Editorial Chairman of The Harvard Crimson [1] In 1983,he graduated Harvard summa cum laude and was inducted into Phi Beta Kappa during his junior year. [1] Immediately after college,Engelmayer spent a year working as a staff reporter for The Wall Street Journal in the paper's Philadelphia bureau. He then attended Harvard Law School,where he was treasurer of the Harvard Law Review ,and graduated magna cum laude in 1987. [2] After law school,Engelmayer clerked for Judge Patricia Wald on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 1987 until 1988, [2] and then for Justice Thurgood Marshall on the Supreme Court of the United States from 1988 until 1989. [2] [3]
From 1989 until 1994,Engelmayer served as a federal prosecutor for the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. He served as an Assistant United States Attorney from 1989 until 1994,and as the Deputy Chief Appellate Attorney in 1994. [4]
From 1994 until 1996,Engelmayer served as an Assistant to the United States Solicitor General Drew S. Days III in Washington D.C. [2] In that role,he argued four cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. As of taking the bench,he had argued over 20 appellate cases. [5]
In 1996,Engelmayer returned to the United States Attorney's Office in Manhattan,serving as the Chief of the Major Crimes Unit. [2] He led the prosecution of Lawrence X. Cusack III,who created and sold $7 million worth of forged documents claiming that President John F. Kennedy paid hush money to conceal a supposed affair with Marilyn Monroe. [6] Engelmayer also received the U.S. Attorney's Director's Award for Superior Performance in 1998 in connection with his prosecution of William F. Duker,a prominent New York City lawyer who defrauded the FDIC and the Resolution Trust Corporation of $1.4 million in overbillings. [4] [7] Engelmayer,along with Lewis Liman,a future colleague on the Southern District of New York bench,also prosecuted three defendants for a scheme to extort $40 million from the actor Bill Cosby by using threats to publicly claim that one of them was Cosby's illegitimate daughter. [8]
In 2000,Engelmayer joined the law firm Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr in Manhattan as a partner. [2] He was the partner in charge of the New York office from 2005 until he was appointed as a federal judge in 2011. [3]
Engelmayer is an elected member of the American Law Institute. [9] He has lectured or taught at numerous law schools and professional conferences. [4] He is a trustee of the Harvard Law Review. [10] In a Wall Street Journal op-ed in 2001,he discussed the challenges faced by prosecutors investigating President Clinton's pardons of Marc Rich and others. [11] In a keynote speech in 2015,he called on Congress to pass an insider trading law. [12]
On February 2,2011,President Barack Obama nominated Engelmayer to fill the judicial seat vacated by Judge Gerard E. Lynch,who was elevated to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [13] The American Bar Association rated Engelmayer as Unanimously Well Qualified. [14] On March 16,2011,Engelmayer attended a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. [15] On March 31,2011,Senator Charles Grassley placed Engelmayer's nomination on hold,along with two other nominations. [16] Grassley later lifted the holds,and the Senate Judiciary Committee referred Engelmayer's nomination to the full Senate. [17] On July 26,2011,the Senate confirmed Engelmayer by a 98–0 vote. [18] He received his commission on July 27,2011. [3]
In 2012,in American Freedom Defense Initiative v. Metropolitan Transit Authority, [19] Engelmayer held that the MTA violated the First Amendment in refusing to permit a pro-Israel advertisement to appear on New York City subways and buses. The plaintiff advocacy organization had sought to place,in response to ads it viewed as anti-Israel,an ad which read:“In any war between the civilized man and the savage,support the civilized man,”adding:“Support Israel. Defeat Jihad.” The MTA blocked the ad based on a policy banning ads that demeaned people based on specified characteristics,including race,color,religion,and national origin. Engelmayer held that the ad was protected political speech. And he held,because the MTA’s demeaning-speech policy was selective,banning such speech only when aimed at certain categories of people,it was content-based without justification. [20] [21] The MTA permitted the ad to run,with a disclaimer. [22]
In 2012,in Starr Int’l Co. vs. Federal Reserve Bank of N.Y., [23] Engelmayer dismissed multi-billion-dollar damages claims brought against the Federal Reserve Bank of New York by a major stockholder in American International Group,Inc. [24] The state-law claims,for breach of fiduciary duty,arose from FRBNY’s exercise of emergency rescue powers during the 2008-2009 financial crisis. Engelmayer held that the claims were federally preempted and that the plaintiff had failed to plead that FRBNY had taken control of AIG. [25]
In 2013,Engelmayer upheld New York City’s policy of awarding bridge and tunnel toll discounts to residents of certain neighborhoods. [26] The plaintiffs,non-resident motorists,had claimed an infringement of the right to travel and of the dormant commerce clause. [27]
In 2013 and 2014,in Hart v. Rick’s Cabaret,Intern.,Inc.,Engelmayer issued pretrial decisions holding a Manhattan strip club liable to a class of more than 1,900 exotic dancers for minimum wage,overtime,and other labor law violations. He held that the dancers were employees,not independent contractors,and protected by the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law. [28] [29] These decisions awarded the class $10.8 million in damages,with additional claims set for trial. [30] The case settled shortly before trial,for approximately $15.5 million. [31]
In 2014,Engelmayer presided over a two-week jury trial of copyright infringement and Lanham Act false-endorsement claims brought by the hip-hop group the Beastie Boys against the energy drink company Monster Energy,which had used segments of five Beastie Boys songs to promote its products online. The jury found for the Beastie Boys and awarded $1.7 million in damages. [32] [33] Engelmayer’s post-trial rulings upheld the verdict [34] and awarded the Beastie Boys an additional $668,000 in prevailing party legal fees. [35] [36]
In 2014,Engelmayer sustained conspiracy and monopolization claims under the Sherman Antitrust Act brought by a class of local television broadcast televisions against SESAC,LLC,the nation’s third largest music licensing organization. [37] The case later settled for $58.5 million,with SESAC agreeing henceforth to resolve disputes over royalty rates in arbitration. [38] In approving the class settlement and fee award,Engelmayer equated its terms to the landmark antitrust consent decrees that for decades have bound ASCAP and BMI,the nation’s two largest music licensing organizations. [39]
In 2015,in a closely watched action for injunctive relief,Amarin Pharma,Inc. v. U.S. Food &Drug Administration,Engelmayer held that the First Amendment bars the FDA from prosecuting a pharmaceutical manufacturer for misbranding,where the manufacturer’s conduct consisted only of truthful speech marketing an off-label use of an FDA-approved product. [40] He held that the First Amendment protects truthful speech by a manufacturer about a product’s off-label uses,much as it protects the same speech when made by other speakers,such as doctors. [41] The FDA did not appeal. [42]
Between 2016 and 2019,Engelmayer issued a series of decisions [43] reviewing and approving aspects of the process of valuing and validating customer claims against the bankruptcy estate of Bernard L. Madoff’s company. [44]
In 2017,Engelmayer held that commercial websites qualify as places of public accommodation under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). He upheld a claim by a visually impaired user to have been denied access because the website lacked assistive computer technology. [45]
In 2017,Engelmayer granted summary judgment in favor of parolee John Doe and his family,whose due process claims alleged that five New York State parole officials had wrongly separated Doe from his wife and infant child for a period of 13 months. He rejected the parole officials’qualified immunity arguments. [46]
Between 2016 and 2019,Engelmayer presided over litigation over claims on behalf of severely disabled adults of years of physical abuse and deficient care at the Union Avenue IRA,a state-run group home referred to by staff as the “Bronx Zoo.” In 2019,after Engelmayer sustained the claims of constitutional,statutory,and state-law violations [47] and strongly urged the state to settle,New York State agreed to pay $6 million to the residents and to surrender control of the facility to a private non-profit agency. [48]
In 2019,Engelmayer granted summary judgment for the defense,ending a nationwide products liability MDL spanning claims by 920 plaintiffs. [49] [50] The plaintiffs claimed that the synthetic hormone secreted by Mirena,an intrauterine contraceptive product made and marketed by Bayer AG and affiliates,caused users to suffer idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH),a condition involving buildup of cerebrospinal fluid around the brain. Engelmayer held that the plaintiffs had not adduced evidence to establish general causation –the capacity of Mirena to cause IIH. He had earlier excluded plaintiffs’seven proposed general causation experts,because their testimony did not satisfy Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals,Inc. and Federal Rule of Evidence 702. [51] [52]
In 2019,in Airbnb,Inc. v. City of New York, [53] Engelmayer enjoined a New York City ordinance which required home-sharing companies to turn over voluminous data each month about hosts,finding it facially invalid under the Fourth Amendment. [54] Describing the scale of the required monthly productions as breathtaking and unprecedented,he wrote:“The city has not cited any decision suggesting that the governmental appropriation of private business records on such a scale,unsupported by individualized suspicion or any tailored justification,qualifies as a reasonable search and seizure.” He added:“An attempt by a municipality in an era before electronic data storage to compel an entire industry monthly to copy and produce its records as to all local customers would have been unthinkable under the Fourth Amendment.” The City and Airbnb later settled the lawsuit. [55]
In 2019,in a ruling on a Freedom of Information Act request, [56] Engelmayer ordered the U.S. Departments of State and Defense each to process at least 5,000 pages per month of materials relating to the killing of Saudi journalist and U.S. resident Jamal Khashoggi. Rejecting the agencies’request for a slower pace of processing,he stated that the request concerned “a matter of exceptional public importance and obvious and unusual time sensitivity.” [57]
In 2019,Engelmayer invalidated a 2019 rule that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services had promulgated to define the statutory conscience rights of federally funded health care entities and providers. [58] The 2019 rule superseded a narrower 2011 rule,adding broadened definitions,new compliance regulations,and a new enforcement mechanism. On a challenge brought by states and cities led by New York State,Engelmayer held that HHS had violated the Administrative Procedure Act. The agency did not have the authority to impose major portions of the rule,he held,and its stated justification for the new rule-making “in the first place —a purported ‘significant increase’in civilian complaints relating to the conscience provisions —was factually untrue.” Engelmayer enjoined the rule’s enforcement on a nationwide basis. [59] [60] [61] Later the same month,courts in the Northern District of California and the Eastern District of Washington issued similar rulings. HHS later dismissed its appeal of the decision and,in 2024,proposed an alternative rule implementing the statutory conscience provisions. [62]
In 2019,following a 10-day bench trial,Engelmayer entered judgment in favor of Nasdaq,Inc.,owner of the world’s second largest stock exchange,on breach-of-contract claims against Exchange Traded Managers Group,LLC,a company that constructed and managed index funds. [63] He held that ETFMG had unlawfully seized and claimed entitlement to the stream of profits generated by a series of index funds,including a successful cybersecurity index fund known as HACK. He awarded Nasdaq more than $78.4 million,plus prejudgment interest. [64]
In 2020,in American Council for the Blind of New York,Inc. v. City of New York, [65] Engelmayer held that New York City had violated the ADA and state and city law,through its longstanding failure to make the City’s pedestrian grid meaningfully accessible to blind and low-vision pedestrians. [66] [67] In 2021,Engelmayer ordered a remedial plan for those violations. [68] It required the City to install accessible pedestrian signals (APS) on a pace that would result in 10,000 signalized intersections being equipped with APS by the end of 2031. [69] In 2022 and 2023,the first two years the remedial plan was implemented,the City’s Department of Transportation installed,respectively,519 and 885 APSs at city intersections,exceeding the targets the remedial plan had set,of 400 and 500 APSs,respectively. [70]
In 2022,Engelmayer dismissed [71] a racketeering lawsuit brought by hedge fund founder Leon Black against his former paramour,her law firm,his former business partner,and a public relations executive,which Black alleged had formed a cabal to destroy him. [72] Engelmayer later denied the law firm’s motion for Rule 11 sanctions against Black, [73] while noting that that motion had presented a substantial question. [74]
In 2022,addressing a question of first impression,Engelmayer denied a facial challenge under the First Amendment to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD). [75] Promulgated in 2000,Reg FD prevents corporations and insiders from making selective disclosures of material non-public information. The challenge arose in a case involving claims by the SEC against the telecommunications company AT&T and three executives. [76] After Engelmayer denied both sides’summary judgment motions,the case settled. [77]
In 2023,in a case arising out of the Trump Administration’s border separation policy,Engelmayer sustained in part and dismissed in part the tort claims of a non-citizen father and son that they had been unlawfully separated at the U.S./Mexico border in 2018. [78] [79]
In 2023,Engelmayer issued a pair of decisions addressing questions of first impression under the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 (EFAA),enacted in 2022. [80] In one,he held that the EFAA’s invalidation of arbitration agreements in cases of sexual assault or harassment extends to the entirety of the case,not merely to the discrete claims that themselves allege or relate to such harassment. [81] [82] In the other,he held the EFAA to require,where a party seeks to invoke the EFAA based on a claim of sexual harassment,that that claim have been plausibly pled. [83]
In 2024,in a closely watched case,Engelmayer dismissed most claims the SEC brought against SolarWinds Corp.,a cybersecurity company,and its chief information security officer,Timothy Brown. In December 2020,SolarWinds had disclosed that it had fallen victim to a large-scale cyber attack,known as SUNBURST. Engelmayer dismissed the SEC’s claim that SolarWinds’disclosures about the attack had been inadequate. He also dismissed the SEC’s claim that the company had inadequate cybersecurity controls,holding that the Securities Exchange Act’s accounting controls provision does not give the SEC authority to regulate cybersecurity controls. [84] However,Engelmayer sustained the securities fraud claims based on a “Security Statement”on the company’s website. The SEC,he held,adequately pled that SolarWinds and Brown,in that statement,had falsely and misleadingly touted the company’s cybersecurity,including its password and access controls,as strong. [85]
Beginning in 2011,Engelmayer presided over the prosecution of 76 members of the Bronx Trinitarios Gang (BTG),a northwest Bronx gang alleged to have been responsible for more than 10 murders,numerous acts of violence,firearms offenses,and narcotics dealing. It resulted in two trials:a 12-week trial of three defendants centered on five murders, [86] and an eight-week trial of two defendants centered on one murder, [87] each resulting in convictions.
Beginning in 2015,Engelmayer presided over the prosecution of 28 members of the 18 Park Gang,a gang based in the Patterson Houses complex in the Bronx alleged to have been responsible for two murders,numerous acts of violence,firearms offenses,and narcotics dealing. It resulted in two trials:of three defendants, [88] and of one defendant, [89] each resulting in convictions. The Government also moved to transfer a juvenile (age-17) gang member for prosecution as an adult,but Engelmayer,after a one-week evidentiary hearing,denied the motion. [90] [91]
Beginning in 2018,Engelmayer presided over the prosecution of 13 members of the Nine Trey gang,a New York City gang alleged to have been a Bloods affiliate and responsible for acts of violence and narcotics dealing. [92] The prosecution resulted in a three-week trial in fall 2019 of two defendants,resulting in convictions. [93] A cooperating witness in the racketeering case was Daniel Hernandez,better known as American rapper 6ix9ine. Engelmayer sentenced 6ix9ine to 24 months in prison,five years of supervised release,and 300 hours of community service. [94]
In 2017,Engelmayer presided over the trial of Hector Rivera,who was convicted of arranging the 2004 murder-for-hire of a diamond dealer,Edouard Nektalov,on 6th Avenue in midtown Manhattan. [95] In 2018,Engelmayer sentenced Rivera to life imprisonment plus 25 years. [96]
In 2019,Engelmayer sentenced Sajmir Alihmehmeti,who was charged with [97] and pled guilty shortly before trial to attempting to provide material support to the terrorist group ISIS,to 22 years in prison. [98]
In 2023,Engelmayer sentenced James Bradley and Arwa Muthana,a husband and wife who each pled guilty to attempting to provide material support to ISIS, [99] to,respectively,11 years [100] and 9 years [101] in prison.
In 2023,Engelmayer sentenced Bashir Kulmiye,a Somali guard who had pled guilty to participating in holding kidnapped American journalist Michael Scott Moore,to 150 months in prison. Two leaders of Moore’s abduction and kidnapping were later each sentenced after a trial in the Eastern District of New York to 30 years imprisonment. [102]
In 2023,Engelmayer upheld,against a challenge based on the Supreme Court’s landmark Second Amendment decision in New York State Rifle &Pistol Ass’n,Inc. v. Bruen,a federal firearms statute,18 U.S.C. §922(n). [103] The statute makes it a crime for a person,while under indictment for a crime of imprisonment exceeding one year,to ship,transport,or receive a firearm that has traveled in interstate commerce. [104]
In 2014,Engelmayer sentenced Nelson Castro,a Bronx assemblyman who was a longtime secret government informant,making recordings of colleagues while twice winning reelection. Calling Castro’s cooperation historic and noting that it had resulted in successful prosecutions including of a fellow assemblyman,Engelmayer sentenced Castro to two years probation and 500 hours community service on his federal false statement charge. “[T]he good that you did by cooperating over a period of years exposed and put an end to far more official corruption and misconduct than you engaged in,”Engelmayer stated. Too often,he said,elected officials “talk a good game about fighting corruption and then they do nothing about it. For all your warts,for all your misdeeds,you did something about it. [105] [106]
In 2015,Engelmayer sentenced Dmitry Braverman,an IT employee at the law firm of Wilson Sonsini,to two years in prison on insider trading charges,based on his trading ahead of mergers underway at the law firm. [107]
In 2016,Engelmayer sentenced Alonzo Knowles,a Bahamian man who had hacked celebrities’email and attempted to sell unreleased movie and television scripts and personal images and videos,to 60 months in prison. The sentence was approximately twice the length recommended by federal sentencing guidelines,in part because Knowles,while awaiting sentencing,had been caught sending emails plotting,upon his release,to sell the scripts and materials. [108]
In 2016,Engelmayer presided over the trial of “Banana King”Thomas Hoey,on charges that he had embezzled nearly $800,000 from the retirement fund of employees of his banana-distribution company. Hoey was convicted at trial. [109] He was sentenced to 84 months imprisonment,66 of which were to run largely consecutive to a separate federal sentence on narcotics and obstruction of justice charges. [110]
In 2017,Engelmayer presided over the trial on insider trading charges of John Afriyie,a Wall Street investment analyst who used his employer’s confidential information relating to a potential acquisition of ADT Corp. as the basis to buy call options,which gained him more than $1.5 million when the acquisition was announced. Afriyie fled on the day of trial but was found and convicted. [111] [112] Engelmayer sentenced him to 45 months in prison. [113]
In 2021 and 2022,Engelmayer presided over the prosecution of five Long Island Railroad officials for a scheme to inflate their overtime hours. Each,in 2018,reportedly received more than $200,000 in overtime pay,with one claiming to have worked 3,864 overtime hours on top of 1,682 regular hours. Engelmayer called the offense “an orgy of overtime fraud carried out on an epic scale.” He imposed sentences ranging from two to eight months in prison. [114] [115] [116]
In 2022,Engelmayer sentenced Hollywood executive William Sadlier to six years imprisonment for defrauding a Blackrock investment fund of more than $30 million,based on two wire fraud schemes in the course of which he fabricated a sham company and posed as a female executive of the company. [117]
In 2022,Engelmayer presided over the trial of Stefan Gillier,a Belgian national who had been extradited to the United States,on wire fraud conspiracy charges based on a scheme to obtain over $6 million in aircraft parts. Gillier was convicted at trial. In 2023,Engelmayer sentenced him to 84 months in prison. [118]
In 2024,Engelmayer presided over the trial of Jonathan Moynahan Larmore,who was convicted of orchestrating a $77 million tender offer fraud. It involved announcing a fake tender offer for shares of WeWork Inc. by a company Larmore had founded,at a price that stood to drive up WeWork’s stock price. Days earlier,Larmore had purchased thousands of WeWork options that stood be worth millions of dollars had the scheme succeeded. [119]
Engelmayer and his wife,Emily Mandelstam,who are both Jewish,live in Manhattan. [120] Engelmayer and Mandelstam have two children,Caroline and William. Engelmayer is a fan of the New York Yankees. [121]
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is a federal trial court whose geographic jurisdiction encompasses eight counties of the State of New York. Two of these are in New York City:New York (Manhattan) and Bronx;six are in the Hudson Valley:Westchester,Putnam,Rockland,Orange,Dutchess,and Sullivan. Appeals from the Southern District of New York are taken to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
The Nonintercourse Act is the collective name given to six statutes passed by the United States Congress in 1790,1793,1796,1799,1802,and 1834 to set boundaries of American Indian reservations. The various acts were also intended to regulate commerce between White Americans and citizens of Indigenous nations. The most notable provisions of the act regulate the inalienability of aboriginal title in the United States,a continuing source of litigation for almost 200 years. The prohibition on purchases of Indian lands without the approval of the federal government has its origins in the Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Confederation Congress Proclamation of 1783.
Leonard v. Pepsico,Inc.,88 F. Supp. 2d 116,,aff'd 210 F.3d 88,more widely known as the Pepsi Points case,is an American contract law case regarding offer and acceptance. The case was brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in 1999;its judgment was written by Kimba Wood.
Irwin Allen Schiff was an American libertarian and tax resistance advocate known for writing and promoting literature in which he argued that the way in which the income tax in the United States is enforced upon individuals,as a tax on one's time or wages,is illegal and unconstitutional. Judges in several civil and criminal cases ruled in favor of the federal government and against Schiff. As a result of these judicial rulings Schiff was in a hospital prison serving a sentence of 162 months at the time of his death.
The Pizza Connection Trial was a criminal trial against the Sicilian and American mafias that took place before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in New York City,U.S. The trial centered on a number of independently owned pizza parlor fronts used to distribute drugs,which had imported US$1.65 billion of heroin from Southwest Asia to the United States between 1975 and 1984. The trial lasted from September 30,1985,to March 2,1987,ending with 18 convictions,with sentences handed down on June 22,1987. Lasting about 17 months,it was the longest trial in the judicial history of the United States.
Jed Saul Rakoff is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Richard M. Berman is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Robert James Timlin was a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Henry Warren Goddard was a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Loretta A. Preska is an American lawyer who serves as a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Born in Albany,Preska received law degrees from Fordham University School of Law and New York University School of Law. She practiced law in New York City from 1973 to 1992 at the law firms of Cahill Gordon &Reindel and Hertzog,Calamari &Gleason. President George H. W. Bush appointed her to the district bench in 1992. She served as chief judge of the court for a seven-year term from 2009 to 2016,and took senior status in 2017. President George W. Bush nominated Preska to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 2008,but the Senate did not act on the nomination.
Denise Louise Cote is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Christopher Fitzgerald Droney is an American lawyer who formerly served as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and judge of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut.
Kevin Thomas Duffy was an American lawyer and United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Wilfred Feinberg was a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and previously was a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State,470 U.S. 226 (1985),was a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning aboriginal title in the United States. The case,sometimes referred to as Oneida II,was "the first Indian land claim case won on the basis of the Nonintercourse Act."
Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Pataki,413 F.3d 266,is an important precedent in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the litigation of aboriginal title in the United States. Applying the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling in City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York (2005),a divided panel held that the equitable doctrine of laches bars all tribal land claims sounding in ejectment or trespass,for both tribal plaintiffs and the federal government as plaintiff-intervenor.
Waesche,Sheinbaum &O'Regan was a New York-based law firm focusing on international litigation and arbitration. It was co-founded in 1979 by Donald M. Waesche,Jr.,Louis P. Sheinbaum and Francis M. O'Regan,partners from the Wall Street firm of Bigham,Englar,Jones &Houston.
In United States law,a nationwide injunction is injunctive relief in which a court binds the federal government even in its relations with nonparties. In their prototypical form,nationwide injunctions are used to restrict the federal government from enforcing a statute or regulation.
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
