Intrauterine device

Last updated

Intrauterine device
Mirena IUD with hand.jpg
Mirena IUD with hand
Background
TypeIntrauterine
First use1800s [1]
Synonyms Intrauterine system
Failure rates (first year)
Perfect use<1% [2]
Typical use<1% [2]
Usage
User remindersNone
Advantages and disadvantages
STI protectionNo
PeriodsDepends on the type
WeightNo effect

The intrauterine device (IUD), also known as an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD or ICD), [3] is a small, T-shaped birth control device that is inserted into the uterus to prevent pregnancy. IUDs are a form of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). [4]

Contents

IUDs are a safe and effective birth control method that can be divided into two major categories based on the mechanism the device uses to prevent pregnancy: hormonal (levonorgestrel) IUDs and copper IUDs. Both types of IUDs can be used in most people with uteruses, including adolescents, those who have never been pregnant, and those who have previously had children. [5] [6] They do not affect breastfeeding and can be inserted immediately after delivery. [7] They may also be used immediately after an abortion. [8] Globally, 19.4% of women of reproductive age use intrauterine contraception according to 2019 data. [9] The IUD has a more invasive insertion procedure than other birth control methods. However, among birth control methods, IUDs, along with other contraceptive implants, result in the greatest satisfaction among users. [10]

Both hormonal and copper IUDs have failure rates of <1%, meaning less than 1 in 100 individuals with an IUD have an unintended pregnancy. [11] In comparison, combined hormonal contraception methods (oral pill, vaginal ring, transdermal patch, etc.) have a failure rate of about 2% with perfect use and 4-7% with typical use. [11] Barrier methods, such as the male condom, have a failure rate of approximately 13% and fertility awareness methods (often referred to as natural family planning or the rhythm method), have a failure rate of 22%. [11] Once an IUD is removed, even after long-term use, fertility returns to normal rapidly. [12]

Hormonal IUDs often reduce menstrual bleeding by up to 90% or stop menstruation altogether. [13] Users may experience daily spotting following insertion, and it can take up to six months to see a decrease in bleeding. [11] Copper IUDs are preferred by some as a non-hormonal birth control option, but they can increase the amount and duration of menstrual bleeding by approximately 50% and lead to worsening of menstrual cramps. [11] More serious potential complications of both types of IUD include expulsion (3–5%) and perforation of the uterus (one in 1,000). [14] [15]

IUDs can also be used as emergency contraception for the prevention of pregnancy immediately following unprotected sex. [16] Copper IUDs are considered the most effective form of emergency contraception, with only 0.1% of those with a copper IUD placed within 5 days of unprotected sex becoming pregnant. [11] Hormonal IUDs are also an acceptable method for emergency contraception, however there is less data regarding effectiveness. [17]

History

The first IUD was developed in 1909 by the German physician Richard Richter of Waldenburg. [18] Unlike modern intrauterine devices, early interuterine (from Latin inter- , meaning "between", as opposed to intra- ) devices crossed both the vagina and the uterus, causing a high rate of pelvic inflammatory disease.

Ernst Gräfenberg, another German physician (after whom the G-spot is named), created the first Ring IUD, Gräfenberg's ring, made of silver filaments. His work was suppressed during the Nazi regime, when contraception was considered a threat to Aryan women. [18] He moved to the United States, where his colleagues H. Hall and M. Stone took up his work after his death and created the stainless steel Hall-Stone Ring. [18]

Jack Lippes helped begin the increase of IUD use in the United States in the late 1950s. In this time, thermoplastics, which can bend for insertion and retain their original shape, became the material used for first-generation IUDs. Lippes also devised the addition of the nylon string to facilitate IUD removal. His trapezoid-shaped Lippes Loop IUD became one of the most popular first-generation IUDs. In the following years, many different-shaped plastic IUDs were invented and marketed. [18] One of these first-generation IUDs was the Dalkon Shield, whose poor design caused bacterial infection and led to thousands of lawsuits. Although it was removed from the market, the Dalkon Shield had a lasting, negative impact on IUD use and reputation in the United States. [19]

The invention of the copper IUD in the 1960s introduced the capital T-shaped design used by most modern IUDs. U.S. physician Howard Tatum determined this shape would work better with the space of the uterine cavity. He predicted this would reduce rates of IUD expulsion. [18] Further, Tatum and Chilean physician Jaime Zipper discovered that copper could be an effective spermicide and developed the first copper IUD. Improvements by Tatum led to the creation of the TCu380A (ParaGard), which is currently the preferred copper IUD. [18]

The hormonal IUD was also invented in the 1960s and 1970s with the goal of mitigating the increased menstrual bleeding associated with copper and inert IUDs. The first model, Progestasert, lasted for one year of use and was quickly discontinued. [19] [20] The Mirena hormonal IUD was released in 1976. [18]

China

In China, the use of IUDs by state health services was part of the government's efforts to limit birth rates. From 1980 to 2014, 324 million women were inserted with IUDs, in addition to the 107 million who had tubal ligation. Until the mid-1990s, the state-preferred IUD was a stainless steel ring, [21] [22] which had a higher rate of complications compared to other types of IUD. It gave rise to the idiom shànghuán (上环), meaning "insert a loop". Nowadays, the IUDs include T and V shapes, the former being the most common and easiest to remove.

Mechanism

Illustration of intrauterine device Blausen 0585 IUD.png
Illustration of intrauterine device

The main mechanisms of action of IUDs occur before fertilization, by preventing sperm from ever reaching the egg. [23] The specific mechanism for preventing sperm from reaching the egg differs by type of IUD.

Hormonal

Hormonal IUDs (referred to as intrauterine systems in the UK) work by releasing a small amount of levonorgestrel, a progestin. The progestin released by hormonal IUDs primarily acts locally within the uterus, resulting in much lower systemic progestin levels than other progestogen only contraceptives. [24] Each type of hormonal IUD varies in size, amount of levonorgestrel released, and duration of effectiveness. The predominant mechanism of action of progestin in the uterus is thickening the cervical mucus to prevent sperm from reaching the fallopian tubes, and ultimately the egg. Hormonal IUDs can also thin the endometrial (uterine) lining and potentially impair implantation, but this is not their usual function. [25] [26] Because they thin the endometrial lining, hormonal IUDs often reduce or entirely stop menstrual bleeding. As a result, they are often used to treat menorrhagia (heavy menses), once pathologic causes of menorrhagia (such as uterine polyps) have been ruled out. [27]

Non-hormonal

Copper

A copper T-shaped IUD with removal strings Tete de sterilet.jpg
A copper T-shaped IUD with removal strings

Copper IUDs acts as a spermicide. Copper ions released from the IUD damage sperm and disrupt their ability to move, preventing sperm from traveling through the cervical mucus or destroying them as they passes through so that they never meet the egg. [28] They also start a local inflammatory reaction that causes the uterus and fallopian tubes to produce a fluid that contains white blood cells, enzymes, and prostaglandins, which are toxic to sperm. [29]

While not the main mechanism of action, studies have found that copper can also alter the endometrial (uterine) lining. This alteration can prevent implantation of a fertilized egg ("blastocyst"), but it cannot disrupt a fertilized egg that has already been implanted in the uterine lining. [30]

Inert

Inert IUDs are not approved for use in the United States, UK, or Canada. Inert IUDs do not have a bioactive component. They are made of inactive materials like stainless steel or plastic. Their primary mechanism of action is causing a local foreign body reaction, which makes the uterine environment hostile both to sperm and to implantation of an embryo. [28] They may have higher rates of preventing pregnancy after fertilization, instead of before fertilization, compared to copper or hormonal IUDs. [31]

Types

The types of intrauterine devices available, and the names they go by, differ by location. The WHO ATC labels both copper and hormonal devices as IUDs. In the United Kingdom, there are more than 10 different types of copper IUDs available. In the United Kingdom, the term IUD refers only to these copper devices. Hormonal intrauterine contraception is labeled with the term intrauterine system (IUS). [32] [33]

In the United States, there are two types available: [34]

Mirena [35] Liletta [36] Kyleena [37] Skyla [38] ParaGard [39]
Hormone (total in device)52 mg

levonorgestrel

52 mg

levonorgestrel

19.5 mg levonorgestrel13.5 mg

levonorgestrel

None
Initial amount released20 μg/day18.6 μg/day16 μg/day14 μg/dayNone
Approved effectiveness for pregnancy prevention8 years8 years5 years3 years10 years
Predominant mechanism of action
  • Levonorgestrel thickens cervical mucus to prevent sperm from reaching egg
  • Copper ions toxic to sperm
Advantages
  • Various hormone level options
  • Reduction in menstrual bleeding after 3 months; some users experience complete cessation of menstrual periods
  • Non-hormonal option preferred by some
  • Most effective form of emergency contraception
Disadvantages
  • Ovarian cysts (although they can be asymptomatic)
  • More invasive insertion procedure compared to other birth control options
  • Heavier menstrual flow and cramps
  • More invasive insertion procedure compared to other birth control options

Inert

In China, where IUDs are the most common form of contraception, copper IUD production replaced inert IUD production in 1993. [40] However, as of 2008, the most common IUD used by immigrants presenting to Canadian clinics for removal of IUDs placed in China was still the stainless-steel ring (SSR). Because the SSR has no string for removal, it can present a challenge to healthcare providers unfamiliar with IUD types not available in their region. [41]

Insertion and removal

Removal strings of an intrauterine device exiting the cervical canal of a nulliparous woman. Image was taken immediately after insertion and injection of lidocaine. IUD nulliparous cervix.jpg
Removal strings of an intrauterine device exiting the cervical canal of a nulliparous woman. Image was taken immediately after insertion and injection of lidocaine.

IUD insertion can occur at multiple timepoints:

  1. interval insertion, the most common, occurs in separation from any recent pregnancy;
  2. post-abortion or post-miscarriage insertion, occurs following an abortion or miscarriage when the uterus is known to be empty;
  3. postpartum insertion, occurs after a woman gives birth (vaginal or cesarean delivery) either immediately, while the woman is still in the hospital, or delayed, up to 6 weeks following delivery. Insertion timing changes the risk of IUD expulsion. [42] [43] [44] [45] [46]

Experiences during IUD insertion and removal vary. Some patients describe the insertion as intense cramps, some as a pinch, and a small portion of patients report no pain. The most recent clinical consensus from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) states that clinicians should offer options for pain control during IUD insertion to all patients. [47] Both medication (pharmacologic) and non-medication options can help treat both pain and/or anxiety that patients may experience during IUD insertion. A wide array of medications, including anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), anxiety medication, numbing gel applied to the surface of the cervix, and numbing injections around the cervix, are safe and effective for use during IUD insertion. [48] Lidocaine injections (paracervical block) are underutilized in the United States as an effective method to reduce pain associated with insertion. [49]

Procedure

During the insertion procedure, the provider will first insert a speculum into the vagina to get a good view of the cervix (the opening to the uterus). The provider will then cleanse the cervix. Next, the provider will hold the cervix and provide a gentle outward pull with a tool called a tenaculum, [50] which stabilizes the cervix and straightens out entrance of the uterus (which is typically curved at rest). This increases ease of insertion and helps with proper placement of the IUD. A suction cervical stabilizer can be used in place of the standard tenaculum, [51] and they may reduce pain associated with the insertion procedure. [52]

The next step of insertion is measurement of the depth of the uterine cavity with a thin uterine sounding (measuring) device. The provider will then set the measured uterine depth on the IUD insertion device to ensure proper placement. The IUD insertion device will then be inserted through the cervix into the uterus to place the IUD. The procedure itself, if uncomplicated, should take no more than five to ten minutes. [53]

For immediate postpartum insertion, the IUD is inserted following delivery of the placenta. After vaginal deliveries, insertions can be done using placental forceps, a longer inserter specialized for postpartum insertions, or manually. After cesarean deliveries, the IUD is placed in the uterus with forceps or manually during surgery prior to suturing the uterine incision. [46] [43] [54]

Generally, the removal is uncomplicated and reported to be not as painful as the insertion because no instrument is inserted through the cervix. [55] For removal, the provider will find the cervix with a speculum and then use ring forceps to grasp the IUD strings in the vaginal cavity and then pull the IUD out.

Manufacturers and other training facilities can teach IUD placement and removal. [56]

Adverse effects

Transvaginal ultrasonography showing a perforated copper IUD as a hyperechoic (rendered as bright) line at right, 30 mm (1.2 in) away from the uterus at left. The IUD is surrounded by a hypoechoic (dark) foreign-body granuloma. Perforated IUD.jpg
Transvaginal ultrasonography showing a perforated copper IUD as a hyperechoic (rendered as bright) line at right, 30 mm (1.2 in) away from the uterus at left. The IUD is surrounded by a hypoechoic (dark) foreign-body granuloma.

Regardless of the IUD type, some potential side effects are similar for all IUDs. Some of these side effects include bleeding pattern changes, expulsion, and pelvic inflammatory disease (especially in the first 21 days after insertion). The occurrence of IUD migration to another location outside of the uterus is rare, with reported rates in medical literature varying between 0.1% and 0.9%. However, when migration occurs, it can lead to serious complications such as uterine perforation and, in rare cases, bladder perforation. Bladder perforation, while uncommon (affecting only 2% of migrated IUDs), can result in symptoms like urinary frequency, hematuria, and stone formation, often necessitating surgical intervention for removal. [57] Regular monitoring and imaging, such as ultrasound or CT scans, are recommended to detect such complications early and ensure timely treatment. A small probability of pregnancy remains after IUD insertion, and when it occurs, there is a greater risk of ectopic pregnancy. [58]

Hormonal IUDs confer an increased risk of ovarian cysts. [59] Mirena lists common (less than 1 in 10 women) side effects as including ovarian cysts, painful periods, increased vaginal discharge, headaches and depression. [60] [61] Hormonal IUDs have been associated with psychiatric symptoms, including depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation, particularly in adolescents and young women, though evidence remains mixed. Some studies report increased depressive symptoms and anxiety, potentially linked to the sensitization of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and elevated cortisol levels. Others find no association or even reduced symptoms. [62]

Copper IUDs confer an increased risk of longer, heavier, and/or more painful menstrual periods. [63]

Other considerations

According to the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, published by the CDC, women and adolescents under the age of 20 and women who have not given birth are classified in category 2 for IUD use, mainly due to "the risk for expulsion from nulliparity and STIs from sexual behavior in younger age groups." According to the CDC, benefits generally outweigh the risks, and IUDs are recommended for young and nulliparous women, although more careful attention may be required. Women over age 20 and those who have previously given birth are placed in category 1, meaning no special concerns are placed on use. [64] [65]

Modern IUDs do not lead to infertility or make it harder for a woman to become pregnant, and fertility typically returns within days of removal. Some prior studies found an association between infertility and the Dalkon Shield, an early IUD design which is no longer available. [66]

Modern IUDs do not cause increased infection. The earlier Dalkon Shield may have, because it contained multifilament strings, which provided bacteria a space to grow and move up the string. IUDs manufactured after 2008 use monofilament strings to prevent this from happening. [67] However, as with any medical procedure, IUDs can lead to increased risk of infection immediately after the insertion.

Menstrual cup companies recommend that women with IUDs who are considering using menstrual cups should consult with their gynecologists before use. There have been rare cases in which women using IUDs dislodged them when removing their menstrual cups, however, this can also happen with tampon use. [68] Despite reports, as of 2023, there is no scientific agreement on whether using a menstrual cup increases the risk of IUD expulsion; more rigorous studies are needed. [69]

Unlike condoms, the IUD does not protect against sexually transmitted infections. [70]

Prevalence and popularity

Globally, 14.3% of married or partnered women of reproductive age (15–49) use intrauterine contraception as their preferred method of family planning. A study found that female family planning providers choose LARC methods more often (41.7%) than the general public (12.1%). [71] However, the adoption of IUDs varies significantly across different regions. In Asia, IUD is particularly popular, with 27% of contraceptive users relying on it, while in Oceania, the usage rate is much lower at 1.8%. Geographically, the majority of IUD users—over 80% worldwide—are concentrated in Asia, with nearly two-thirds (64%) of these users living in China, according to a 2011 United Nations review. [72]

IUD use is more prevalent in less developed regions (15.1% of women) compared to more developed regions (9.2% of women). Within continents, there are significant variations. For instance, in Europe, IUD usage ranges from 5% in Southern Europe to 16–28% in countries like France and Scandinavia. In Africa, IUD use is relatively low in sub-Saharan regions (less than 2%) but higher in Northern Africa, particularly in countries such as Egypt (36.1%) and Tunisia (27.8%). [72] In the United States, the use of IUDs increased from 0.8% in 1995 to 7.2% from the period of 2006 to 2014 [73] [74] and to 10.5% in a 2017-2019 survey. [75] IUD usage rates are also influenced by ethnicity within the United States, with Hispanic women more likely to use IUD compared to Caucasian women. [72]

Among birth control methods, IUDs, along with other contraceptive implants, result in the greatest satisfaction among users. [10]

Cost

In the United States, intrauterine devices (IUDs) typically cost between $0 and $1,300, with prices covering medical exams, insertion, and follow-up visits. [76] Under the Affordable Care Act, most insurance plans must cover all FDA-approved birth control methods, including IUDs. Coverage for specific brands may vary. [77]

References

  1. Callahan T, Caughey AB (2013). Blueprints Obstetrics and Gynecology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 320. ISBN   978-1-4511-1702-8.
  2. 1 2 "ParaGard (copper IUD)". Drugs.com. 7 September 2019. Retrieved 3 December 2019.
  3. "IUD (intrauterine device)". Contraception guide. NHS Choices. Archived from the original on 9 August 2017. Retrieved 2 March 2014. the intrauterine device, or IUD (sometimes called a coil)
  4. Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Madden T, Allsworth JE, et al. (May 2012). "Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception". The New England Journal of Medicine. 366 (21): 1998–2007. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110855 . PMID   22621627. S2CID   16812353.
  5. Adeyemi-Fowode OA, Bercaw-Pratt JL (September 2019). "Intrauterine Devices: Effective Contraception with Noncontraceptive Benefits for Adolescents". Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology . 32 (5): S2 –S6. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2019.07.001. PMID   31585615.
  6. Bahamondes MV, Bahamondes L (22 January 2021). "Intrauterine device use is safe among nulligravidas and adolescent girls". Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica . 100 (4): 641–648. doi:10.1111/aogs.14097. ISSN   0001-6349. PMID   33483956.
  7. Gabbe S (2012). Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 527. ISBN   978-1-4557-3395-8.
  8. Roe AH, Bartz D (January 2019). "Society of Family Planning clinical recommendations: contraception after surgical abortion". Contraception. 99 (1): 2–9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.08.016 . PMID   30195718.
  9. Haakenstad A, Angelino O, Irvine CM, Bhutta ZA, Bienhoff K, Bintz C, et al. (23 July 2022). "Measuring contraceptive method mix, prevalence, and demand satisfied by age and marital status in 204 countries and territories, 1970–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019". The Lancet . 400 (10348): 295–327. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00936-9. PMC   9304984 . PMID   35871816.
  10. 1 2 "Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices". Obstetrics and Gynecology. 120 (4): 983–988. October 2012. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723b7d. PMID   22996129. S2CID   35516759.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Teal S, Edelman A (28 December 2021). "Contraception Selection, Effectiveness, and Adverse Effects: A Review". JAMA. 326 (24): 2507–2518. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.21392. ISSN   0098-7484. PMID   34962522.
  12. Girum T, Wasie A (23 July 2018). "Return of fertility after discontinuation of contraception: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Contraception and Reproductive Medicine . 3 (1) 9. doi: 10.1186/s40834-018-0064-y . ISSN   2055-7426. PMC   6055351 . PMID   30062044.
  13. Gemzell-Danielsson K, Kubba A, Caetano C, Faustmann T, Lukkari-Lax E, Heikinheimo O (23 February 2021). "Thirty years of mirena: A story of innovation and change in women's healthcare". Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 100 (4): 614–618. doi:10.1111/aogs.14110. ISSN   1600-0412. PMC   8248365 . PMID   33544887.
  14. Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell D (16 March 2016). "Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives". Open Access Journal of Contraception . 7: 19–32. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S85546 . ISSN   1179-1527. PMC   5683155 . PMID   29386934.
  15. Marnach ML, Long ME, Casey PM (March 2013). "Current issues in contraception". Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 88 (3): 295–299. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.01.007 . PMID   23489454.
  16. "Emergency Contraception - ACOG". www.acog.org. Retrieved 26 March 2018.
  17. Salcedo J, Cleland K, Bartz D, Thompson I (May 2023). "Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendation: Emergency contraception". Contraception . 121 109958. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2023.109958. PMID   36693445.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Thiery M (March 1997). "Pioneers of the intrauterine device" (PDF). The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 2 (1): 15–23. doi:10.1080/13625189709049930. PMID   9678105. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 August 2006.
  19. 1 2 Thiery M (June 2000). "Intrauterine contraception: from silver ring to intrauterine contraceptive implant". European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 90 (2): 145–152. doi:10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00262-1. PMID   10825633.
  20. Bürger Z, Bucher AM, Comasco E, Henes M, Hübner S, Kogler L, et al. (1 October 2021). "Association of levonorgestrel intrauterine devices with stress reactivity, mental health, quality of life and sexual functioning: A systematic review" . Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 63 100943. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2021.100943. ISSN   0091-3022. PMID   34425187.
  21. "Chinese ring". www.obgyn.net. 14 July 2011. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
  22. "Intrauterine Devices (IUDs)". www.fhi360.org. Archived from the original on 22 February 2015. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
  23. "Myths and facts about... the Intra-Uterine Device (IUD)". IPPF. 17 February 2012. Retrieved 18 January 2021.
  24. Malik S (January 2013). "Levonorgestrel-IUS system and endometrial manipulation". Journal of Mid-Life Health. 4 (1): 6–7. doi: 10.4103/0976-7800.109625 . PMC   3702070 . PMID   23833526.
  25. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group (2008). "Intrauterine devices and intrauterine systems". Human Reproduction Update. 14 (3): 197–208. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn003 . PMID   18400840. Both copper IUDs and levonorgestrel releasing IUSs may interfere with implantation
  26. Hatcher RA (2011). Contraceptive technology (20th rev. ed.). [New York, N.Y.]: Ardent Media. p. 162. ISBN   978-1-59708-004-0. Although the precise mechanism of action is not known, currently available IUCs work primarily by preventing sperm from fertilizing ova.26 IUCs are not abortifacients: they do not interrupt an implanted pregnancy.27 Pregnancy is prevented by a combination of the "foreign body effect" of the plastic or metal frame and the specific action of the medication (copper or levonorgestrel) that is released. Exposure to a foreign body causes a sterile inflammatory reaction in the intrauterine environment that is toxic to sperm and ova and impairs implantation.28,29 The production of cytotoxic peptides and activation of enzymes lead to inhibition of sperm motility, reduced sperm capacitation and survival, and increased phagocytosis of sperm.30,31… The progestin in the LNg IUC enhances the contraceptive action of the device by thickening cervical mucus, suppressing the endometrium, and impairing sperm function. In addition, ovulation is often impaired as a result of systemic absorption of levonorgestrel
  27. Bahamondes L, Bahamondes MV, Monteiro I (July 2008). "Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: uses and controversies". Expert Review of Medical Devices. 5 (4): 437–445. doi:10.1586/17434440.5.4.437. PMID   18573044. S2CID   659602.
  28. 1 2 Ortiz ME, Croxatto HB (June 2007). "Copper-T intrauterine device and levonorgestrel intrauterine system: biological bases of their mechanism of action". Contraception. 75 (6 Suppl): S16 –S30. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2007.01.020. PMID   17531610.
  29. "Understanding the IUD | Center for Research". National Center For Health Research. 15 July 2013. Archived from the original on 8 August 2013. Retrieved 8 August 2013.
  30. "Facts are Important: Emergency Contraception (EC) and Intrauterine Devices (IUDs) are Not Abortifacients" (PDF). American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 12 June 2014. Retrieved 14 July 2015. Copper ions released from the IUD create an environment that is toxic to sperm, preventing fertilization.14 Copper can also alter the endometrial lining, but studies show that this alteration can prevent implantation, but not disrupt implantation
  31. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group (April 2008). "Intrauterine devices and intrauterine systems". Human Reproduction Update. 14 (3): 197–208. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn003 . PMID   18400840.
  32. "Contraceptive coils (IUDs)". NetDoctor.co.uk. 2006. Archived from the original on 17 July 2006. Retrieved 5 July 2006.
  33. French R, Van Vliet H, Cowan F, Mansour D, Morris S, Hughes D, et al. (2004). Sorhaindo AM (ed.). "Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2004 (3) CD001776. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001776.pub2. PMC   8407482 . PMID   15266453.
  34. "IUDs--an update" (PDF). Population Reports. Series B, Intrauterine Devices (6): 1–35. December 1995. PMID   8724322. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 February 2006. Retrieved 1 January 2006.
  35. "Mirena: Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system" (PDF). www.accessdata.fda.gov. August 2022. Retrieved 11 November 2025.
  36. "Liletta: levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system" (PDF). www.accessdata.fda.gov. June 2023. Retrieved 13 November 2025.
  37. "Kyleena: Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system" (PDF). www.accessdata.fda.gov. March 2023. Retrieved 13 November 2025.
  38. "Syla: levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system" (PDF). www.accessdata.fda.gov. March 2023. Retrieved 11 November 2025.
  39. "ParaGard (intrauterine copper contraceptive)" (PDF). www.accessdata.fda.gov. June 2024. Retrieved 13 November 2025.
  40. Bilian X (June 2007). "Chinese experience with intrauterine devices". Contraception. 75 (6 Suppl): S31 –S34. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.12.007. PMID   17531613.
  41. Cheung VY (June 2010). "A 10-year experience in removing Chinese intrauterine devices". International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 109 (3): 219–222. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.12.018. PMID   20219193. S2CID   8020802.
  42. "Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Implants and Intrauterine Devices". www.acog.org. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
  43. 1 2 Okusanya BO, Oduwole O, Effa EE (July 2014). "Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014 (7) CD001777. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001777.pub4. PMC   7079711 . PMID   25101364.
  44. "Early Pregnancy Loss". www.acog.org. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
  45. Lopez LM, Bernholc A, Hubacher D, Stuart G, Van Vliet HA (June 2015). "Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015 (6) CD003036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd003036.pub3 . PMC   10777269 . PMID   26115018.
  46. 1 2 Jatlaoui TC, Whiteman MK, Jeng G, Tepper NK, Berry-Bibee E, Jamieson DJ, et al. (October 2018). "Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis". Obstetrics and Gynecology. 132 (4): 895–905. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002822. PMC   6549490 . PMID   30204688.
  47. "Pain Management for In-Office Uterine and Cervical Procedures". www.acog.org. Retrieved 13 November 2025.
  48. Bayer LL, Ahuja S, Allen RH, Gold MA, Levine JP, Ngo LL, et al. (May 2025). "Best practices for reducing pain associated with intrauterine device placement". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology . 232 (5): 409–421. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.039. PMID   39909325.
  49. Murai R. "Why haven't we figured out how to make IUDs less excruciating?". Mother Jones. Retrieved 18 January 2023.
  50. Johnson BA (January 2005). "Insertion and removal of intrauterine devices". American Family Physician. 71 (1): 95–102. PMID   15663031.
  51. Yaron M, Legardeur H, Barcellini B, Akhoundova F, Mathevet P (1 July 2023). "Safety and efficacy of a suction cervical stabilizer for intrauterine contraceptive device insertion: Results from a randomized, controlled study". Contraception. 123 110004. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110004. ISSN   0010-7824. PMID   36914147.
  52. Ansanay-Alex S (7 February 2023). "Aspivix receives U.S. FDA Clearance for Carevix™, Their Novel Cervical Stabilizer". BioAlps. Retrieved 5 January 2025.
  53. "What's an IUD insertion like?". www.plannedparenthood.org. Retrieved 29 March 2018.
  54. Whitaker AK, Chen BA (January 2018). "Society of Family Planning Guidelines: Postplacental insertion of intrauterine devices". Contraception. 97 (1): 2–13. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.014 . PMID   28987293.
  55. Barnes Z. "This Is What to Expect After Getting Your IUD Removed". SELF. Retrieved 30 March 2018.
  56. "Clinical Education and Training". www.acog.org. Retrieved 21 August 2019.
  57. Liu G, Li F, Ao M, Huang G (16 August 2021). "Intrauterine devices migrated into the bladder: two case reports and literature review". BMC Women's Health. 21 (1): 301. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01443-w . ISSN   1472-6874. PMC   8365895 . PMID   34399735.
  58. "ParaGard (copper IUD)". Mayo Clinic. Retrieved 30 November 2018.
  59. Bahamondes L, Hidalgo M, Petta CA, Diaz J, Espejo-Arce X, Monteiro-Dantas C (August 2003). "Enlarged ovarian follicles in users of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and contraceptive implant". The Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 48 (8): 637–640. PMID   12971147.
  60. "Mirena: Consumer Medicine Information" (PDF). Bayer. March 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 April 2014. Retrieved 27 April 2014.
  61. "Mirena 20 micrograms/24 hours intrauterine delivery system - Patient Information Leaflet (PIL) - (emc) | 1132". www.medicines.org.uk. Retrieved 25 July 2025.
  62. Elsayed M, Dardeer KT, Khehra N, Padda I, Graf H, Soliman A, et al. (3 July 2023). "The potential association between psychiatric symptoms and the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (LNG-IUDs): A systematic review". The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry. 24 (6): 457–475. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2022.2145354 . ISSN   1562-2975. PMID   36426589.
  63. Kaneshiro B, Aeby T (1 July 2010). "Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine Copper T-380A contraceptive device". International Journal of Women's Health. 2: 211–220. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S6914 . PMC   2971735 . PMID   21072313.
  64. "Classifications for Intrauterine Devices". www.cdc.gov. 9 April 2020. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  65. Curtis KM, Tepper NK, Jatlaoui TC, Berry-Bibee E, Horton LG, Zapata LB, et al. (July 2016). "U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016". MMWR. Recommendations and Reports. 65 (3): 1–103. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6503a1 . PMID   27467196.
  66. Shoupe D, Mishell Jr DR (28 September 2015). The Handbook of Contraception: A Guide for Practical Management. Humana Press. ISBN   978-3-319-20185-6.
  67. Gibbs RS (2008). Danforth's Obstetrics and Gynecology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN   978-0-7817-6937-2.
  68. "Menstrual Cup use and IUDs". Feminine Wear. Archived from the original on 13 July 2017. Retrieved 22 December 2013.
  69. Bowman N, Thwaites A (January 2023). "Menstrual cup and risk of IUD expulsion - a systematic review". Contraception and Reproductive Medicine. 8 (1) 15. doi: 10.1186/s40834-022-00203-x . PMC   9863186 . PMID   36670496.
  70. "What Are the Side Effects & Complications of the IUD?". www.plannedparenthood.org. Retrieved 21 November 2017.
  71. "New Study Finds Women's Health Providers Use IUDs More Than Any Other Method of Birth Control". www.plannedparenthood.org. Retrieved 27 March 2018.
  72. 1 2 3 Buhling KJ, Zite NB, Lotke P, Black K (1 March 2014). "Worldwide use of intrauterine contraception: a review". Contraception. 89 (3): 162–173. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.011 . ISSN   0010-7824. PMID   24369300.
  73. "Products - Data Briefs - Number 188 - February 2015". www.cdc.gov. Retrieved 27 March 2018.
  74. "Contraceptive Use in the United States". Guttmacher Institute. 4 August 2004. Retrieved 19 April 2019.
  75. Kamiya Y, Molitoris J, Roldán RP, Zhang G (April 2024). "World Contraceptive Use 2024". www.un.org. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Retrieved 19 June 2025.
  76. "IUD Birth Control | Info About Mirena & ParaGard IUDs". www.plannedparenthood.org. Retrieved 2 December 2018.
  77. "Where Can I Buy the IUD & How Much Will It Cost?". www.plannedparenthood.org. Retrieved 27 March 2019.