Two-child policy

Last updated

A two-child policy is a government-imposed limit of two children allowed per family or the payment of government subsidies only to the first two children.

Contents

A two-child policy has previously been used in several countries including Iran, Singapore, and Vietnam. In British Hong Kong in the 1970s, citizens were also highly encouraged to have two children as a limit (although it was not mandated by law), and it was used as part of the region's family planning strategies. From 2016 to 2021, it had been implemented in China, replacing the country's previous one-child policy, until it was replaced by a three-child policy to mitigate the country's falling birth rates. [1] [2] [3] [4] In July 2021, all family size limits as well as penalties for exceeding them were removed. [5]

Africa

Egypt

As Egypt faces over population and high densities, the city of Cairo initiated a family planning campaign known as “Two is Enough” in 2017 [6] to encourage Egyptian families to have no more than two children. [7] By April 2021 the program managed to refer 853,643 women to family planning clinics [8] [9]

Asia

East Asia

Hong Kong

In Hong Kong, the Eugenics League was founded in 1936, which became The Family Planning Association of Hong Kong in 1950. [10] The organization provides family planning advice, sex education, and birth control services to the general public of Hong Kong. In the 1970s due to the rapidly rising population, it launched the "Two is Enough" campaign, [10] which reduced the general birth rate through educational means. The organization [11] founded the International Planned Parenthood Federation, with its counterparts in seven other countries. [11] The total fertility rate in Hong Kong is currently 1.04 children per woman, one of the lowest in the world. Although the "Two is Enough" campaign found widespread approval, it does not reflect current government policy in supporting families. Tax allowances of 100,000 HK$ per child can be claimed for up to 9 children. [12] Furthermore, parents who have fallen into hardship can apply for special assistance from the state. This is a means-tested financial benefit, which is not limited to a particular number of children either. [13]

China

From 1979 until 2015, Chinese citizens were generally permitted to have only one child, with certain exceptions. [14] The ongoing Cultural Revolution and the strain it placed on the nation were large factors. During this time, the birth rate dropped from nearly 6 children per woman to just under 3. [15] (The colloquial term "births per woman" is usually formalized as the Total Fertility Rate (TFR), a technical term in demographic analysis meaning the average number of children that would be born to a woman over her lifetime if she were to experience the exact current age-specific fertility rates through her lifetime.) Previously, the fine is so-called "social maintenance fee" and it is the punishment for the families who have more than one child. According to the policy, the families who violate the law may bring the burden to the whole society. Therefore, the social maintenance fee will be used for the operation of the basic government. [16]

As China's youngest generation (born under the one-child policy, which first became a requirement for most couples in 1979) came of age for formation of the next generation, a single child would be left with having to provide support for their two parents and four grandparents. In response to this issue, by 2009 all provinces allowed couples to have two children if both parents were the only children of their parents themselves. [17] After a policy change of the Chinese government in late 2013, most Chinese provinces further relaxed the policy in 2014 by allowing families to have two children if one of the parents is an only child. [18] [19] [20]

Han Chinese living in rural areas were often permitted to have two children, as exceptions existed if the first child was a daughter. [21] Because of cases such as these, as well as urban couples who simply paid a fine (or "social maintenance fee") to have more children, [22] the overall fertility rate of mainland China is, in fact, closer to two children per family than to one child per family (1.8). In addition, since 2012, Han Chinese in southern Xinjiang were allowed to have two children. This, along with incentives and restrictions against higher Muslim Uyghur fertility, was seen as attempt to counter the threat of Uyghur separatism. [23]

On 29 October 2015, Xinhua reported the change in the existing law to a two-child policy citing a statement from the Chinese Communist Party. [3] [4] The new policy allowing Chinese couples to have two children was proposed to help address the ageing issue in China. [24] On 27 December 2015, the new law was passed in the session of the National People's Congress Standing Committee, which governs country's laws, effective from 1 January 2016. [25] [26] [27]

In 2018, about two years after the new policy reform, China is facing new ramifications from the two-child policy. Since the revision of the one-child policy, 90 million women have become eligible to have a second child. [28] According to The Economist , the new two-child policy may have negative implications on gender roles, with new expectations for women to bear more children and to abandon their careers. [29]

After the reform, China saw a short-lived boost in fertility rate for 2016. Chinese women gave birth to 17.9 million babies in 2016 (a record value in the 21st century), but the number of births declined by 3.5% to 17.2 million in 2017, [29] and to 15.2 million in 2018. [30] [31]

In China, men have greater marital power, which increases fertility pressure on their female partners. [28] The dynamic of relationships (amount of "power" held by each parent), and the amount of resources each parent has contributes to the struggle for dominance. [32] Resources would be items such as income, and health insurance. Dominance would be described as who has the final say in pregnancy, who must resign in their career for maternal/parental leave. However, women have shown interest in a second child if the first child did not possess the desired gender. [29]

Chinese couples were also polled and stated that they would rather invest in one child opposed to two children. [28] To add, another concern for couples would be the excessive costs of raising another child; China's childcare system needs to be further developed. [33] The change in cultural norms appears to be having negative consequences and leads to fear of a large aging population with smaller younger generations; thus the lack of workforce to drive the economy. [32]

In May 2018, it was reported that Chinese authorities were in the process of ending their population control policies. [34] In May 2021, the Chinese government announced it would scrap the two-child policy in favour of a three-child policy, allowing couples to have three children to mitigate the country's falling birth rates. [1] [2]

Middle East

Iran

Iran authorities encouraged families in Iran not to have more than two children when conducting family planning in Iran from the early 1990s to late 2006. Iran's government "declared that Islam favoured families with only two children", as one historian put it. [35] When the family planning program was initiated, Iran's Health Ministry launched a nationwide campaign and introduced contraceptives - pills, condoms, IUDs, implants, tubal ligations, and more. [36] Starting in 2006, the government's population control policy changed when Ahmadinejad called for reversal of Iran's existing policy of "two children is enough" [37] and later in 2012 Ayatollah Khamenei also stated that Iran's contraceptive policy made sense 20 years ago, "but its continuation in later years was wrong ... Scientific and experts studies show that we will face population aging and reduction (in population) if the birth-control policy continues." [38]

Southeast Asia

Myanmar

In Myanmar, Rohingya people have been subjected to two-child policies. [39] [40] Aung San Suu Kyi, the UN and Human Rights Watch described the policy as a human rights violation in 2013. [41] [42]

Singapore

In Singapore, the two-child policy until the 1980s was called "Stop at Two".

Vietnam

Vietnam has had a population policy for over 50 years. It was launched by the Vietnamese government in the early 1960s in North Vietnam and continues in a modified form today, throughout all of Vietnam (not just the north). [43] The policy emphasizes the official family-size goal to be một hoặc hai con, which means "one or two children." [44]

In 2014, Vietnam had an estimated population of 92.5 million people, which represented 1.28% of the total world population. [45] As of 2020, the total fertility rate of Vietnam is approximately 2.0, [46] which is close to the replacement-level fertility of 2.1, the rate "at which a population exactly replaces itself from one generation to the next" according to the World Resources Institute. [47]

History

From 1954 to 1975, Vietnam was split into North and South Vietnam along the 17th parallel with separate governments and policies in each region. North Vietnam became the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and had a communist government, whereas South Vietnam became the Republic of Vietnam and was more aligned with the United States and other Western nations. [48] In 1963, North Vietnam began a policy advocating a two-child norm due to the sharp population increase of the largely poor and rural population. [44] Vietnam's family planning policy was developed before those of other countries, such as China. The government used a system of information, education, communication (IEC) campaign and publicly accessible contraceptives to curb the population. [49] After the reunification of North and South Vietnam in 1975 under the Communist Party, there was a governmental effort to extend the policies of the North to the rest of Vietnam, which extended into the next decade. [50] Though the government of the Republic of Vietnam adopted family planning in general as the official state policy, inadequate medical facilities prevented the policy from being effectively implemented. [51]

In 1982, the Vietnam government practiced various family planning measures, including the allowance of use of abortion and the creation of the National Committee for Population and Family Planning. After 1983, each family was required to limit the number of children to two. In 1985, the government increased incentives, such as contraceptives and abortion acceptors, and disincentives, such as penalties for violations in family planning. [51]

In 1986, the Party implemented the Renovation ( Đổi Mới ) Policy, which completely reversed the Communist Party economy to implement capitalistic market ideals. The aims of the Renovation Policy were to end Vietnam's economic isolation, increase competitiveness, and raise living standards. [52] In an attempt to effectively develop the population socioeconomically and increase the standard of living within the population, the Vietnam government emphasized the need to contain birth rates. [53] In 1988, the Council of Ministers issued an in-depth family planning policy, adding additional restrictions beyond the previous restriction of keeping the maximum number of children per household to two. [54] The detailed one-or-two-child policy of Vietnam was established nine years after China's one-child policy was implemented, and elements of China's policy are reflected in Vietnam's, such as the emphasis on marrying later, [43] postponing childbearing age (22-years of age or older for women and 24-years of age or older for men), [54] and spacing out birth of children (3–5 years apart). [43] [54] The state was required to supply free birth control devices (such as intrauterine loops, condoms, and birth control pills) and to provide facilities for individuals who are eligible for abortions. [54] Furthermore, if families did not comply with the two-child policy, they were required to pay high fees and were unable to move into urban centers. [54]

In 1993, the Vietnamese government issued the first formalization for the unified Vietnam of the one-to-two child policy as a mandatory national policy. The policy combined advertisements and education to promote a smaller family "so people may enjoy a plentiful and happy life." [55] The Vietnamese government explicitly linked the family planning policy with "historical and cultural traditions, value structures and development objectives," encouraging a collectivist mindset in which individuals honor the needs of the nation above their own. [53] The goal of the policy was to reduce the Vietnamese fertility rate to the replacement level of 2.1 [47] by 2015, so that the country could have a stable population in the mid-21st century. In 1997, the goal was accelerated to reach the replacement level by 2005, and the government subsequently integrated an increased use of abortion as a means to curb population growth. [56]

In 2003, the Standing Parliamentary Committee of the National Assembly issued the highest legislative document on population titled the Population Ordinance, which restructured the official family planning policy. [43] According to the ordinance, couples "shall have the right to decide on the time to have babies, the number of children and the duration between child births." [57] However, shortly after, the government implemented the National Strategy on Population 2001–2010, which again called for decreasing the fertility rate to the replacement level by 2005. This caused controversy as individuals protested the conflicting messages purported by the government in regards to their reproductive rights. [43] To address this confusion, the government issued Resolution 47 in 2005 which stated that "to sustain high economic growth, Viet Nam needs to pursue a population control policy until it has become an industrialized country." However at this time, the population had already reached the goal of having a total fertility rate below the replacement level. [43]

In 2009, the Population Ordinance was amended to again restrict the number of children to be one or two children, although individuals were allowed to decide the timing and spacing of their births. [58] The government is currently drafting a new Law on Population to replace the Population Ordinance in 2015. However, there is disagreement between policy makers and academics on what should be included in the law. [59]

Administration

The organizational structure of the two-child policy was housed under different governmental units since its conception in the 1960s. As the policy evolved from "Initiation in the 1960s–1970s; Maturity in the 1980s–1990s; and Legalization in the 2000s–2010s", [43] the administration of the population policy also changed. From 1961 to 1983, the population program fell under the Population and Birth Control Unit. From 1984 to 2002, it was under the control of National Committee for Population and Family Planning. From 2003 to 2006, it was in the jurisdiction of the Vietnam Commission for Population, Family and Children. Since 2007, the population program has been under the General Office for Population and Family Planning. [43]

Although the policy was advocated on the national level, the central government did not utilize specific fines or incentives, instead delegating implementation responsibilities to local governments. [49] Each family was required to have at most two children, and local governments were responsible to decide the details of enforcement. Depending on the specific location, district governments charged fines ranging from 60 to 800 kilograms of paddy rice, equivalent to the worth of a month to a year's wages, for each additional child, and additionally, women who agreed to be sterilized were given bonuses of 120 to 400 kilograms of rice. Individuals who did not use contraceptives sometimes had their names announced over the intercom system of the village to shame them into using them, whereas individuals who did could be selected to win the Labor Medal for "good realization of the population – family planning program". [49] The government and large companies also regularly denied people who violated the policy of their salaries, promotions, and sometimes even their jobs. [49]

Current status

Currently, the effective population policy is the revised 2009 Population Ordinance which states that "each couple and individual has the right and responsibility to participate in the campaigns on population and family planning, reproductive health care: (i) decide time and birth spacing; (ii) have one or two children, exceptional cases to be determined by the Government." [58] Thus, individuals have control over the timing and spacing of the births of their children but are still restricted in the number of children they are allowed to have. Furthermore, later that year, Chief Executive Trương Tấn San stressed the need for continued diligence in population control and stated that the population of Vietnam should be 100 million people by 2020, and suggested that a new comprehensive Law on Population be introduced to the government by 2015. [43]

Effects of this policy
Reduction of the birthrate

The total fertility rate in Vietnam dropped from 5.6 in 1979 to 3.2 by 1993, suggesting the two-child policy was successful in containing the population growth. [60] According to one demographic model, the Bongaarts' model of components of fertility, high rates of contraceptive use and of induced abortion are plausible explanations for the decreased fertility rate. Furthermore, because of this policy, the population has fundamentally changed their ideas of the family. In 1988, the Inter-Censal Demographic and Health Survey found that parents wanted an average of 3.3 children, and in 1994, they found that the ideal number of children fell to 2.8. [60]

However, the reported findings differ depending on the fertility model utilized and on the particular research study cited. The United Nations Economic and Social Council for Asia and the Pacific found that the average number in household was 3.1 in 1998. [61] In another study conducted by the America-based non-profit, non-governmental organization Population Reference Bureau, the number found was lower at 2.3. [62] Another study, published in the Worldwide State of the Family in 1995 by Tran Xuan Nhi, [63] found a contrasting finding that the total fertility rate only dropped slightly and the size of nuclear families experienced only a slight change, dipping from 4.8 to 4.7 from 1989 to 1994. [61]

Sex-based differences

There is evidence that son preference exists in Vietnam. [64] Traditionally, men oversee and are responsible for household enterprises, managing agriculture, ancestral worship, and carrying on the family name. [65] However, although the desire for a son is seen in the Vietnamese family's fertility practices, the desire for more than one son is not. [65] Families with two daughters are twice as likely to have a third child than families with at least one son, presumably with the hopes that this one will be a boy. [65] Furthermore, women who do not have any sons are around 15% less likely to use contraceptives than families who have at least one. [64] There were also increased rates of "contraceptive failure" amongst couples who had a son, as families secretly removed an IUD to bypass the policy in hopes of having a son. [66] This is consistent with findings from other East Asian countries in which son preference corresponds with a demand for fewer children so that families will have at least one son to maintain the ancestral line. [64]

Despite the evidence for son preference, there is no clear evidence that Vietnam's sex ratio at birth is increasing, as seen in other East Asian countries, notably China, though evidence is conflicting depending on the source. [66] In fact, according to the Vietnamese census data for 1989 and 1999, the sex ratios of males to females at birth are actually decreasing. [66] On the other hand, some sources state that the impact of son preference varies by region of Vietnam. In the north, there is a strong relationship between sex bias in fertility decisions and number of male births, while in the south, this relationship is nonexistent. [65] However, mothers who pursue certain occupations, such as government cadres and farmers, are more likely to want a particular sex of child and have higher sex-ratio differences at birth. This reflects the pressure for government employees to adhere to the two-child limit, and the perceived necessity of males for manual labor in the farm. [66]

Criticism
Inadequate contraceptives

Although the policy states that "the state will supply, free of charge, birth control devices... to eligible persons who are cadres, manual workers, civil servants or members of the armed forces... and poor persons who register to practice family planning... The widespread sale of birth control devices will be permitted to facilitate their use by everybody that needs them," [54] the only modern contraceptive readily available in Vietnam is the IUD. [67] However, many women choose not to use it due to the side effects, such as increased bleeding, back and abdominal pains, headache, and general weakness. [68] Thus, contraceptive use is low among women under the age of 25, and experts have speculated that "contraceptive use among young women might increase if temporary, easy-to-use methods, such as the pill and the condom, were more accessible. For the government to achieve its two-child policy, the survey committee recommends increased promotion of the commercial availability of the condom and the pill, and strengthening of the government family planning program." [67]

Increased abortion

Abortion rates in Vietnam are unusually high by international standards, with a total abortion rate of at least 2.5 abortions per woman. [69] Generally, the abortion rate for young age groups is higher than older age groups due to a limited awareness of contraceptive methods and availability. Individuals of lower educational levels also have higher abortion rates. [70] Vietnam also has some of the world's most liberal abortion laws, though the Vietnamese government is aiming to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies and abortion-related difficulties. [71] Although sex-selective abortions were banned by the government in 2006, [71] there is evidence that suggests that son preference is associated with a higher likelihood of repeat abortions, as women with no sons were significantly less likely to have a repeat abortion compared to women with one son. [72]

There are multiple factors influencing Vietnam's high abortion rates. First, because women do not have access to contraceptive methods besides IUDs, whilst condoms remain expensive relative to average income, as a result many do not use effective birth control. [69] Women who have undergone multiple abortions used short-term methods of contraceptives, such as condoms and contraceptive pills, which are less effective than long-acting contraceptives to which many do not have access. [72] Secondly, due to the higher costs of raising a child in some geographic areas of Vietnam, abortions have become more acceptable. [69] Furthermore, the era of modernization and development of free-market reforms since the 1980s has led to a rise in premarital and unwanted pregnancy, and subsequently increased abortion services. [69] Additionally, the Vietnamese government has insufficient alternatives to abortion within the family planning purposes and a lack of post-abortion contraceptive dialogues for families. [71] Thus, experts have suggested providing more diverse, long-acting contraceptive alternatives and increasing counseling for families that have experienced an abortion as methods to decrease abortion in Vietnam. [72]

Europe

United Kingdom

In October 2012, the Conservative Party's proposed policy of only paying child benefit for the first two children of unemployed parents has been described as a 'two-child policy', [73] and has been fronted by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and former leader of the Conservative Party Iain Duncan Smith. [74]

In April 2015, David Cameron denied any such plans to cut child benefits or tax credits. However, three months later, George Osborne, the then Chancellor, announced that child tax credits would be limited to the first two children only. This was to come into force from the 2017/2018 financial year and apply to children born after that date only. [75] From February 2019 however the policy becomes retrospective. Families making a new benefit claim (or whose circumstances change) will have the 2-child policy applied to them irrespective of when their children were born.

The two-child policy took effect on 5 April 2017. One aspect of the new rules, termed the "rape clause" [76] has caused controversy. Although the policy excludes all but the first two children from all available benefits, an exemption can be applied for if the conception of the third and any further children occurred as a result of the rape of the claimant. A woman wishing to claim this exemption must fill in an eight-page form:

"The form requires women wanting to be eligible for the exemption to sign a declaration saying they were raped or otherwise coerced into sex – and giving the child’s name. They must sign a declaration reading: 'I believe the non-consensual conception exemption applies to my child.' They must also sign another declaration that says: 'I confirm that I am not living with the other parent of this child.'" [77]

That women must thereby identify the child in question (which is thought to be assigned a tax code created for this exemption [78] ), that first or second children conceived by rape do not count towards this exemption and that women who are still living with their abusers are not eligible are just some of the aspects of the rape clause that caused widespread condemnation. Ruth Graham, writing for Slate, summarises the issues surrounding this new policy:

"The policy and the exemption have received harsh criticism from a wide variety of sources since they were announced in 2015. One member of parliament called the exemption implementation 'inhumane and barbaric.' Feminists have pointed out the cuts disproportionately affect women. A coalition of the UK's largest Christian denominations and Jewish groups pointed out that the policy discriminates against people whose religion compels them to have larger families. A United Nations committee on children’s rights asked the British government to explain the policy last year, because of concerns about women having to somehow prove they were raped." [79]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">One-child policy</span> Former population control policy in China

The one-child policy was a population planning initiative in China implemented between 1979 and 2015 to curb the country's population growth by restricting many families to a single child. The program had wide-ranging social, cultural, economic, and demographic effects, although the contribution of one-child restrictions to the broader program has been the subject of controversy. Its efficacy in reducing birth rates and defensibility from a human rights perspective have been subjects of controversy.

Sterilization is any of a number of medical methods of permanent birth control that intentionally leaves a person unable to reproduce. Sterilization methods include both surgical and non-surgical options for both males and females. Sterilization procedures are intended to be permanent; reversal is generally difficult.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human population planning</span> Practice of controlling rate of growth

Human population planning is the practice of managing the growth rate of a human population. The practice, traditionally referred to as population control, had historically been implemented mainly with the goal of increasing population growth, though from the 1950s to the 1980s, concerns about overpopulation and its effects on poverty, the environment and political stability led to efforts to reduce population growth rates in many countries. More recently, however, several countries such as China, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Iran, Italy, Spain, Finland, Hungary and Estonia have begun efforts to boost birth rates once again, generally as a response to looming demographic crises.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family planning</span> Planning when to have children

Family planning is the consideration of the number of children a person wishes to have, including the choice to have no children, and the age at which they wish to have them. Things that may play a role on family planning decisions include marital situation, career or work considerations, financial situations. If sexually active, family planning may involve the use of contraception and other techniques to control the timing of reproduction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Birth rate</span> Total number of live births per 1,000 divided by time period

Birth rate, also known as natality, is the total number of live human births per 1,000 population for a given period divided by the length of the period in years. The number of live births is normally taken from a universal registration system for births; population counts from a census, and estimation through specialized demographic techniques. The birth rate is used to calculate population growth. The estimated average population may be taken as the mid-year population.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Total fertility rate</span> Number of children a woman is expected to have barring select circumstances

The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of a population is the average number of children that are born to a woman over her lifetime if:

  1. they were to experience the exact current age-specific fertility rates (ASFRs) through their lifetime
  2. and they were to live from birth until the end of their reproductive life.

Iran had a comprehensive and effective program of family planning since the beginning of the 1990s. While Iran's population grew at a rate of more than 3% per year between 1956 and 1986, the growth rate began to decline in the late 1980s and early 1990s after the government initiated a major population control program. By 2007 the growth rate had declined to 0.7 percent per year, with a birth rate of 17 per 1,000 persons and a death rate of 6 per 1,000. Reports by the UN show birth control policies in Iran to be effective with the country topping the list of greatest fertility decreases. UN's Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs says that between 1975 and 1980, the total fertility number was 6.5. The projected level for Iran's 2005 to 2010 birth rate is fewer than two.

Abortion in Russia is legal as an elective procedure up to the 12th week of pregnancy, and in special circumstances at later stages.

Abortion in China is legal throughout pregnancy and generally accessible nationwide. Abortions are available to most women through China's family planning program, public hospitals, private hospitals, and clinics nationwide. China was one of the first developing countries to permit abortion when the pregnant woman's health was at risk and make it easily accessible under these circumstances in the 1950s. Following the Chinese Communist Revolution and the proclamation of the People's Republic of China in 1949, the country has periodically switched between more restrictive abortion policies to more liberal abortion policies and reversals. Abortion regulations may vary depending on the rules of the province. In an effort to curb sex-selective abortion, Jiangxi and Guizhou restrict non-medically necessary abortions after 14 weeks of pregnancy, while throughout most of China elective abortions are legal after 14 weeks. Although sex-selective abortions are illegal nationwide, they were previously commonplace, leading to a sex-ratio imbalance in China which still exists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family planning in India</span> Efforts to curb unintended pregnancies in India

Family planning in India is based on efforts largely sponsored by the Indian government. From 1965 to 2009, contraceptive usage has more than tripled and the fertility rate has more than halved, but the national fertility rate in absolute numbers remains high, causing concern for long-term population growth. India adds up to 1,000,000 people to its population every 20 days. Extensive family planning has become a priority in an effort to curb the projected population of two billion by the end of the twenty-first century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family planning in Pakistan</span> Political issue

Even though there is considerable demand for family planning in Pakistan, the adoption of family planning has been hampered by government neglect, lack of services and misconceptions. Demographics play a large role in Pakistan's development and security since the change from military rule to civilian leadership. Challenges to Pakistani's well-being, opportunities for education and employment, and access to health care are escalated due to the country's continuously-growing population. It was estimated in 2005 that Pakistan's population totaled 151 million; a number which grows 1.9 percent annually, equaling a 2.9 million population growth per year. Though Pakistan's fertility rates still exceed those of neighboring South Asian countries with a total fertility rate at 4.1 and contraception use is lower than 35 percent, approximately one-fourth of Pakistani women wish to either delay the birth of their next child or end childbearing altogether.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Population planning in Singapore</span> Two distinct phases of the population planning in Singapore

Population planning in Singapore has reflected various policies to both slow and boost the growth rate of Singapore's population. Singapore first began population planning initiatives in an attempt to slow and reverse the rapid increase in births that began after World War II. Later on, from the 1980s, policy was tailored towards growth, attempting to encourage mothers to have more children. In 2020, the annual total population growth rate in Singapore was -0.3%, and its resident total fertility rate (TFR) was 1.10, below the replacement rate of 2.1.

Fertility factors are determinants of the number of children that an individual is likely to have. Fertility factors are mostly positive or negative correlations without certain causations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family planning policies of China</span> Population planning policy of China

China's family planning policies have included specific birth quotas as well as harsh enforcement of such quotas. Together, these elements constitute the population planning program of the People's Republic of China. China's program should not be confused with the family planning programs instituted in other countries, which were designed to encourage parents to have the number of children they desired—in China, the provision of contraception through family planning programs was subservient to a birth planning program under which the government designated how many births parents could have in order to control the size of its population.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Birth control in Africa</span>

Access to safe and adequate sexual and reproductive healthcare constitutes part of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as upheld by the United Nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prevalence of birth control</span> Overview article

Globally approximately 45% of those who are married and able to have children use contraception. As of 2007, IUDs were used by about 17% of women of child bearing age in developing countries and 9% in developed countries or more than 180 million women worldwide. Avoiding sex when fertile is used by about 3.6% of women of childbearing age, with usage as high as 20% in areas of South America. As of 2005, 12% of couples are using a male form of contraception with rates of up to 30% in the developed world.

For years, the census data in China has recorded a significant imbalance sex ratio toward the male population, meaning there are fewer women than men. This phenomenon is sometimes referred to as the missing women or missing girls of China. In 2021, the male-to-female ratio of China is recorded at 104.61 to 100.

Abortion in Uganda is illegal unless performed by a licensed medical doctor in a situation where the woman's life is deemed to be at risk.

Communist and Marxist ideologies generally allow state-provided abortion, although there is no consensus among Communist parties and governments about how far into the pregnancy abortion should be allowed.

Abortion in Vietnam is legal until 22 weeks of pregnancy and provided free of charge by the state through Article 44 of the 1989 Public Health Protection Law. Vietnam also has one of the highest rates of abortion that has been surveyed in the world and its abortion laws are among the most liberal in Southeast Asia and the world.

References

  1. 1 2 Wee, Sui-Lee (31 May 2021). "China Says It Will Allow Couples to Have 3 Children, Up From 2". The New York Times. Retrieved 31 May 2021.
  2. 1 2 "China announces three-child policy in a major policy shift". CNBC. 31 May 2021. Retrieved 31 May 2021.
  3. 1 2 "China to allow three". BBC. 29 October 2018.
  4. 1 2 "China to allow three children for all couples". Xinhua. 29 February 2020.[ dead link ]
  5. Cheng, Evelyn (21 July 2021). "China scraps fines, will let families have as many children as they'd like". CNBC. Retrieved 29 April 2022.
  6. Bletry, Nadia (15 April 2019). ""Two is enough!" – Egypt intends to limit the number of children to two per family". Genethique. Retrieved 5 December 2021.
  7. Emam, Amr. "Egypt parliament mulls financial incentives for two-child policy | Amr Emam". The Arab Weekly. Archived from the original on 5 December 2021. Retrieved 5 December 2021.
  8. "Egypt's 'Two is Enough' project refers 853,643 women to family planning clinics". dailynewsegypt.com. Retrieved 5 December 2021.
  9. "5.5M door-to-door visits carried out as part of 'Two Enough' campaign". EgyptToday. 18 March 2021.
  10. 1 2 History of the Family Planning Association of Hong Kong Archived 27 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  11. 1 2 History of International Planned Parenthood Federation Archived 13 August 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  12. "Amount of Allowance for the Latest 7 years". GovHK. The Government of Hong Kong. Retrieved 13 April 2017.
  13. "A GUIDE TO COMPREHENSIVE SOCIAL SECURITY ASSISTANCE" (PDF). Social Welfare Department. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Social Welfare Department. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 September 2017. Retrieved 13 April 2017.
  14. "one-child policy - Definition & Facts".
  15. "The World Factbook — Central Intelligence Agency". www.cia.gov. 15 March 2022.
  16. Jiang, Quanbao; Liu, Yixiao (1 October 2016). "Low fertility and concurrent birth control policy in China". The History of the Family. 21 (4): 551–577. doi: 10.1080/1081602X.2016.1213179 . ISSN   1081-602X. S2CID   157905310.
  17. "计生委新闻发言人:11%以上人口可生两个孩子 (English: "Spokesperson of the one-child policy committee: 11% or more of the population may have two children)" (in Chinese). Sina.com. 10 July 2007. Retrieved 7 November 2008.
  18. Patti Waldmeir (15 November 2013). "China's 'one-child' rethink marks symbolic shift". FT. Retrieved 19 November 2013.
  19. Ouyang, Y. (2013). "China relaxes its one-child policy". The Lancet. 382 (9907): e28–e30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62544-1 . PMID   24298609. S2CID   31618458.
  20. 杨洁. "Most Chinese provincial areas relax one-child policy - China - Chinadaily.com.cn". www.chinadaily.com.cn.
  21. Yardley, Jim (11 May 2008). "China Sticking With One-Child Policy". The New York Times . Retrieved 20 November 2008.
  22. "New rich challenge family planning policy Archived 2007-10-15 at the Wayback Machine ." Xinhua .
  23. "The government in Xinjiang is trying to limit Muslim births". The Economist . 7 November 2015. Retrieved 10 November 2015.
  24. "News Analysis: Two-child policy calls for better public services - Xinhua | English.news.cn". news.xinhuanet.com. Archived from the original on 31 October 2015. Retrieved 31 October 2015.
  25. "Top legislature amends law to allow all couples to have two children". Xinhua News Agency. 27 December 2015. Archived from the original on 28 December 2015.
  26. "China officially ends one-child policy, signing into law bill allowing married couples to have two children". ABC Online. 27 December 2015.
  27. "China: 1 child policy ends officially, bill allowing 2nd child signed". Hindustan Times. 27 December 2015.
  28. 1 2 3 "China's two-child policy may exacerbate gender inequality". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 27 March 2018.
  29. 1 2 3 "China is in a muddle over population policy". The Economist. Retrieved 27 March 2018.
  30. Leng, Sidney (21 January 2019). "China's birth rate falls to its lowest rate since 1961". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 22 January 2019.
  31. "China's Debate Over a Shrinking Birth Rate Highlights Growth Concerns". Bloomberg. 3 January 2019. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
  32. 1 2 Qian, Yue; Jin, Yongai (21 February 2018). "Women's Fertility Autonomy in Urban China: The Role of Couple Dynamics Under the Universal Two-Child Policy". Chinese Sociological Review. 50 (3): 275–309. doi:10.1080/21620555.2018.1428895. S2CID   158137927.
  33. "No Easing of Two-Child Policy, Official Says - Caixin Global". www.caixinglobal.com. Retrieved 10 April 2018.
  34. Beijing, Didi Tang (22 May 2018). "China to scrap family planning rules as birthrate dwindles" . The Times. ISSN   0140-0460 . Retrieved 22 May 2018.
  35. Abrahamian, History of Modern Iran, (2008), p.184
  36. Sciolino, Elaine, Persian Mirrors : the Elusive Face of Iran, Free Press, 2000, 2005 (p.282)
  37. Prospects for Ahmadinejad’s Call for More Rapid Population Growth in Iran Archived 29 November 2008 at the Wayback Machine Tait, Robert (23 October 2006). "Ahmadinejad urges Iranian baby boom to challenge west". Guardian Unlimited. London: The Guardian. Retrieved 3 March 2010.
  38. "Iran urges baby boom, slashes birth-control programs". usatoday. Retrieved 3 July 2015.
  39. "Burmese Muslims given two-child limit". the Guardian. Associated Press. 25 May 2013. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  40. "Burma's Bluff on the Two-Child Policy for Rohingyas". Human Rights Watch. 21 June 2013. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  41. Marshall, Jason Szep, Andrew R. C. (11 June 2013). "Myanmar minister backs two-child policy for Rohingya minority". Reuters. Retrieved 16 August 2021.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  42. "Burma: Revoke 'Two-Child Policy' For Rohingya". Human Rights Watch. 28 May 2013. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  43. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Pham, Bang Nguyen; Hill, Peter S; Hall, Wayne; Rao, Chalapati. "The Evolution of Population Policy in Viet Nam". School of Population Health, University of Queensland. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
  44. 1 2 Goodkind, Daniel (March 1995). "Vietnam's One-or-Two-Child Policy in Action". Population and Development Review. 21 (1): 85–111. doi:10.2307/2137414. JSTOR   2137414.
  45. "Vietnam Population (Live)". Worldometers. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
  46. "Fertility rate, total (births per woman)". World Bank. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
  47. 1 2 Searchinger, Tim; Hanson, Craig; Waite, Richard; Lipinski, Brian; Leeson, George; Harper, Sarah (8 July 2013). "Achieving Replacement Level Fertility". World Resources Institute.
  48. Langguth, A.J. (12 March 2002). Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975 . Simon & Schuster. p.  671. ISBN   978-0-7432-1231-1.
  49. 1 2 3 4 Knudsen, Lara (30 June 2006). Reproductive Rights in a Global Context: South Africa, Uganda, Peru, Denmark, United States, Vietnam, Jordan (1 ed.). Vanderbilt University Press. pp.  139–168. ISBN   978-0-8265-1528-5.
  50. Allman, James; Vu, Qui Nhan; Nguyen, Minh Thang; Pham, Bich San (September 1991). "Fertility and Family Planning in Vietnam". Studies in Family Planning. 22 (5): 308–317. doi:10.2307/1966685. JSTOR   1966685. PMID   1759276.
  51. 1 2 "Viet Nam". United Nations. Retrieved 19 April 2015.
  52. Freeman, Donald (April 1996). "Doi Moi Policy and the Small-Enterprise Boom in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam". Geographical Review. 86 (2): 178–197. doi:10.2307/215955. JSTOR   215955.
  53. 1 2 Bruun, Ole; Jacobsen, Michael (2 September 2000). Human Rights and Asian Values: Contesting National Identities and Cultural Representations in Asia. Psychology Press. pp. 161–180. ISBN   978-0-7007-1212-0.
  54. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Council of Ministers (March 1989). "Vietnam's New Fertility Policy". Population and Development Review. 15 (1): 169–172. doi:10.2307/1973424. JSTOR   1973424.
  55. "Resolution of 1993 on Policy Concerning the Population and Family Planning Work". Hanoi Voice of Vietnam Network. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
  56. May, John F. (30 March 2012). World Population Policies: Their Origin, Evolution, and Impact . Springer. pp.  139–145. ISBN   978-94-007-2836-3.
  57. Population Ordinance (6/2003), The Standing Committee of National Assembly
  58. 1 2 "Ordinance No. 08/2008" . Retrieved 12 March 2015.
  59. Pham, Bang Nguyen (2014). "The Demographic Transition and Implications for the New Law on Population in Vietnam". Asian Population Studies. 10 (3): 237–240. doi:10.1080/17441730.2014.955162. S2CID   154567470.
  60. 1 2 Haughton, Jonathan (1997). "Falling Fertility in Vietnam". Population Studies: A Journal of Demography. 51 (2): 203–211. doi:10.1080/0032472031000149916.
  61. 1 2 Wisensale, Steven (2000). "Family Policy in a Changing Vietnam". Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 31 (1): 79–90. doi:10.3138/jcfs.31.1.79.
  62. "An Overview of Population and Development in Vietnam". Population Reference Bureau. Archived from the original on 1 August 2015. Retrieved 19 April 2015.
  63. Nhi, Tran Xuan, Vietnam's families, Worldwide State of the Family
  64. 1 2 3 Haughton, Jonathan; Haughton, Dominique (1995). "Son Preference in Vietnam". Studies in Family Planning. 26 (6): 325–337. doi:10.2307/2138098. JSTOR   2138098. PMID   8826072.
  65. 1 2 3 4 Guilmoto, Christophe Z. (March 2012). "Son Preference, Sex Selection, and Kinship in Vietnam". Population and Development Review. 38 (1): 31–54. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00471.x. PMID   22833863.
  66. 1 2 3 4 Belanger, Daniele; Khuat, Thi Hai Oanh; Liu, Jianye; Le, Thanh Thuy; Pham, Viet Thanh (2003). "Are Sex Ratios at Birth Increasing in Vietnam?". Population. 58 (2): 231–250. doi:10.2307/3246604. JSTOR   3246604.
  67. 1 2 Edwards, S. (September 1992). "In Vietnam, Contraceptive Awareness High, Use Low Despite Two-Child Policy". International Family Planning Perspectives. 18 (3): 117–119. doi:10.2307/2133412. JSTOR   2133412.
  68. Johansson, Annika; Le, Thi Nham Tuyet; Nguyen, Lap; Kajsa, Sundstrom (September 1996). "Abortion in Context: Women's Experience in Two Villages in Thai Binh Province, Vietnam". International Family Planning Perspectives. 22 (3): 103–107. doi:10.2307/2950750. JSTOR   2950750.
  69. 1 2 3 4 Goodkind, Daniel (December 1994). "Abortion in Vietnam: Measurements, Puzzles, and Concerns". Studies in Family Planning. 25 (6): 342–352. doi:10.2307/2137878. JSTOR   2137878. PMID   7716799.
  70. Nguyen, Thanh Binh (January 2012). "Abortion in Present Day Vietnam". International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2 (1): 56–62.
  71. 1 2 3 Whittaker, Andrea (2012). Abortion in Asia: Local Dilemmas, Global Politics. Berghahn Books. ISBN   978-0-85745-795-0.
  72. 1 2 3 Ngo, Thoai D.; Keogh, Sarah; Nguyen, Thang H.; Le, Hoan T.; Pham, Kiet H. T.; Nguyen, Yen B.T. (June 2014). "Risk factors for repeat abortion and implications for addressing unintended pregnancy in Vietnam". International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 125 (3): 241–246. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.11.014. PMID   24726618. S2CID   7256344.
  73. Ramesh, Randeep (25 October 2012). "Two-child benefits policy targets the strivers in low-paid jobs". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 29 October 2012.
  74. Grice, Andrew (26 October 2012). "What is Iain Duncan Smith's two-child policy?". The Independent. London. Retrieved 29 October 2012.
  75. Bennett, Asa (26 October 2015). "Tax credits: what are they, who claims them, and why is everyone so angry about the cuts?". London: The Telegraph. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  76. "rape clause"/ What is the rape clause?, October 9, 2019
  77. Walker, Peter; Butler, Patrick (6 April 2017). "Government under fire over new child tax credit form for rape victims". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  78. Rustin, Susanna (17 March 2017). "The 'rape rule' for tax credits tramples the rights of children it's meant to protect". The Guardian. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  79. Graham, Ruth (10 April 2017). "This Cruel New U.K. Policy Punishes Women for Having More Than Two Children 378 69 618". Slate. Retrieved 12 April 2017.

Further reading