Enns returned to Westminster Theological Seminary in 1994 to begin his teaching career. He was tenured in 2000 and promoted to full professor in 2005 as a professor of Old Testament and Biblical hermeneutics. Among other duties,he served as Associate Academic Dean from 1998 to 2001,chair of the Hermeneutics (Ph.D.) Field Committee (1997–2000),and edited the Westminster Theological Journal (2000–2005).[9] His publication of the book Inspiration and Incarnation led to institutional strife and the eventual loss of Enns's teaching position at Westminster Theological Seminary by 2009.[10]
Enns was a senior fellow of Biblical studies with the BioLogos Foundation,[11] a Christian organization that "explores,promotes,and celebrates the integration of science and Christian faith".[12] He wrote nearly 100 blog posts at the BioLogos Forum,"Science and the Sacred." He also has written several pieces for The Huffington Post's religion section.
Enns's academic interests include Old Testamenttheology,Biblical Theology,Wisdom Literature (especially Ecclesiastes),the New Testament use of the Old Testament,Second Temple literature,and the general issue of how the historical context of the Bible affects how the nature of Scripture is understood within Reformed tradition and Evangelical commitments.[15] He has written many articles,essays,dictionary and encyclopedia entries,and book reviews on varied topics surrounding the Old Testament and its interpretation (see "Books" and "Articles and Essays" below). His 2008 edited volume (with Tremper Longman III),Dictionary of the Old Testament:Wisdom,Poetry,and Writings (IVP),won the Christianity Today "Award of Merit" for 2009[16] and the Evangelical Christian Publishers Association’s "2009 Christian Book of the Year" award in the Bible Reference and Study category.[17] His 2012 publication,The Evolution of Adam:What the Bible Does and Doesn't Say about Human origins,won the gold award in the Religion category of the 2012 ForeWord Reviews Book of the Year Awards. Enns has also contributed to a Bible curriculum for grades 1–12 Telling God's Story,and a book on the hermeneutical implications of the discussion between Christianity and science. He has also taught courses at Princeton Theological Seminary,Harvard University,Fuller Theological Seminary,Eastern University,and Biblical Theological Seminary.
Inspiration and Incarnation
Enns garnered significant attention for his 2005 book Inspiration and Incarnation:Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament. His stated purpose for writing the book is "to bring an evangelical doctrine of Scripture into conversation with the implications generated by some important themes in modern biblical scholarship—particularly the Old Testament—over the past 150 years".[18] Enns's primary audience is those readers who find it difficult to maintain their faith in God because "familiar and conventional" evangelical approaches often mishandle the challenges raised by modern biblical scholarship.[19] Enns writes that evangelicals commonly take a defensive posture to new ideas,and that such defenses are "exercises in special pleading,attempts to hold on to comfortable ideas despite evidence that makes such ideas problematic. It is precisely the ineffectiveness of certain ways of thinking about the Bible that can sometimes cause significant cognitive dissonance for Christians who love and want to hold on to their Bible,but who also feel the weight of certain kinds of evidence".[20]
Enns looks at three issues raised in modern biblical scholarship that he feels are mishandled by Evangelicals:(1) the strong similarities between the Old Testament and the literature of other ancient societies;(2),theological diversity among the Old Testament authors;(3) how New Testament writers interpreted the Old Testament in inventive ways that reflect Jewish practices of the time.[21]
In all three cases,the Bible behaves in ways that don't seem very inspired,but rather very human. Enns argues for an incarnational understanding of the Bible as a way to take seriously these types of challenges. This model draws an analogy between Jesus and the Bible:"In the same way that Jesus is—must be—both God and human,the Bible is also a divine and human book".[22] The Bible is not "an abstract,otherworldly book,dropped out of heaven. It was connected to and therefore spoke to those ancient cultures....precisely because Christianity is a historical religion,God’s word reflects the various historical moments in which Scripture was written".[23] Enns feels that the problems raised by the "human dimension" of the Bible for many evangelicals "has less to do with the Bible itself and more to do with our own preconceptions" of how the Bible ought to be.[20] Enns advocates an incarnational model to help evangelicals reorient their expectations of Scripture and so come to peace with new developments in their understanding of the Bible.
Inspiration and Incarnation has been endorsed by such notable scholars as Hugh G. M. Williamson,Bill T. Arnold,David W. Baker,Tremper Longman III,Joel Green and others for its creative approach to solving the modern problem of the Bible. While initially commending the book,Bruce Waltke later backtracked his book blurb and expressed some noted disagreement with Enns' views on biblical inerrancy. It has also met with criticism by D. A. Carson,Paul Helm,and G. K. Beale,who claim it abandons the traditional evangelical doctrine of biblical inerrancy. The book was the cause of controversy at Enns' institution (Westminster Seminary),with a slight majority of the faculty supporting Enns while a slight majority of the Board of Directors disagreed with him. Enns would eventually resign his teaching position in September 2008.[24][25]
Baker Books released the 10th-anniversary edition of Inspiration and Incarnation in the summer of 2015,which includes an essay on the reception and continued impact of the book.
Suspension from Westminster Theological Seminary
Enns's book,Inspiration and Incarnation:Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament,proved controversial at Westminster Theological Seminary (WTS). WTS President Peter Lillback said that it "has caught the attention of the world so that we have scholars that love this book,and scholars who have criticized it very deeply.... We have students who have read it say it has liberated them. We have other students that say it's crushing their faith and removing them from their hope. We have churches that are considering it,and two Presbyteries have said they will not send students to study under Professor Enns here."[26]
The general content of Inspiration and Incarnation was taught by Enns over his fourteen-year teaching career at Westminster Theological Seminary. It was only after the book's publication in 2005 that a lengthy controversy ensued in the wake of major administrative changes,most notably the election of Peter Lillback as president in 2005. The main point of contention was whether the book was within the theological boundaries of the Westminster Confession of Faith. Westminster faculty members take an oath that their teaching will be in line with that confession.
Lillback initiated a series of regular faculty meetings ("Faculty Theology Fellowship") to discuss Enns and his book. Those meetings,moderated by Lillback,took place over a two-year period and led to the preparation of two written reports,at Lillback's direction,to aid the faculty in determining whether or not Enns was in violation of his oath. (Although Westminster has had a board of trustees for some time,it has historically been governed by its faculty,particularly in theological matters.) These reports were written by the two field committees:the Historical and Theological Field Committee,composed of faculty members generally opposed to Enns's book,and the Hermeneutics Field Committee,composed of members generally favorable towards Enns's ideas. After both committees reported their findings in the form of written reports,as well as written response by each committee to the other's report,faculty members William Edgar and Michael Kelly prepared a motion (known as the Edgar-Kelly Motion) declaring that Enns's writing and teaching were within the bounds of his faculty oath. All official documents used in these faculty debates,including both field committee reports and the Edgar-Kelly Motion,can be downloaded from the Westminster Theological Seminary web site here Archived May 27,2010,at theWayback Machine . The motion was approved by the faculty,12–8,in December 2007. Despite the work of these committees and the resulting faculty vote,President Lillback referred the matter immediately to the board of trustees.
On March 26,2008,the board of trustees at Westminster Theological Seminary voted 18–9 to suspend Enns from his position effective May 23,2008.[27] Though the faculty voted 12–8 that the work falls within the parameters of the Westminster Confession of Faith,[27] the chairman of the Board said that a majority of the members on the Board at that time felt the book was incompatible with the Confession.[26] As of August 1,2008,Enns and the seminary agreed to part ways.[28][29] Following the Board's vote,nine trustees resigned from the board.
Selected works
Thesis
Enns, Peter E. (1994). Exodus Retold (Ph.D.). Harvard University.
——— (1997). Exodus Retold: Ancient Exegesis of the Departure from Egypt in Wis 10:15-21 and 19:1-9. Harvard Semitic Museum Monographs. Vol.57. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press. ISBN978-0-7885-0403-7. OCLC37465235. - revision of doctoral dissertation of 1994
——— (2000). Exodus: from biblical text ... to contemporary life. NIV Application Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. ISBN978-0-340-75660-7. OCLC42690109.
——— (2005). Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker. ISBN978-0-8010-2730-7. OCLC57283747.
——— (2006). Invitation to Genesis: a Short-Term Disciple Bible Study. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press. ISBN978-0-687-49492-7. OCLC904209493.
——— (2010). Telling God's Story: a parent's guide to teaching the Bible. Charles City, VA: Olive Branch Books. ISBN9781933339467. OCLC601107614.
——— (2011). Ecclesiastes. Two Horizons Old Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans. ISBN9780802866493. OCLC719426755.
———; Byas, Jared (2012). Genesis for Normal People: A Guide to the Most Controversial, Misunderstood, and Abused Book of the Bible. Englewood, CO: Patheos Press. ISBN978-1939221032. OCLC823929930.
——— (2014). The Bible Tells Me So: Why Defending Scripture Has Made Us Unable to Read It. San Francisco, CA: HarperOne. ISBN978-0-06-227202-7. OCLC903675129.
——— (2019). How the Bible Actually Works: In Which I Explain How An Ancient, Ambiguous, and Diverse Book Leads Us to Wisdom Rather Than Answers -- and Why That's Great News. San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins. ISBN978-0062686749. OCLC1037294406.
——— (1996). "Law of God". In VanGemeren, Willem A. (ed.). New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and Exegesis. Vol.4. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. pp.893–900. OCLC862711900.
——— (1997). "The Interpretation of Psalm 95 in Hebrews 3.1-4.13". In Evans, Craig A.; Sanders, James A. (eds.). Early Christian Interpretation of the Scriptures of Israel: Investigations and Proposals. Journal for the Study of the New Testament - Supplement Series. Vol.148. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press. pp.352–63. ISBN9781850756798. OCLC782324273. - partial republishing of the article "Creation and Re-creation: Psalm 95 and its Interpretation in Hebrews 3:7-4:13" (see below)
——— (1998). "A Retelling of the Song at the Sea in Wis 10,20-21". In Evans, Craig A.; Sanders, James A. (eds.). The Function of Scripture in Early Jewish and Christian Tradition. Journal for the Study of the New Testament - Supplement Series. Vol.154. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press. pp.142–65. ISBN9781850758303. OCLC782496047. - republishing of the 1995 article. (see below)
——— (2000). "Wisdom of Solomon and Biblical Interpretation in the Second Temple Period". In Packer, J. I.; Soderlund, Sven K. (eds.). The Way of Wisdom: Essays in Honor of Bruce K. Waltke. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. pp.212–25. ISBN9780310864608. OCLC903689880.[30]
——— (2003). "col haadam and the Evaluation of Qohelet's Wisdom in Qoh 12:13, or The 'A is so, and What's More, B' Theology of Ecclesiastes". The Idea of Biblical Interpretation: essays in honor of James L. Kugel. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism. Vol.83. Leiden: E. J. Brill. pp.125–37. ISBN9781589833876. OCLC260231108.
——— (2009). "Fuller meaning, single goal: a christotelic approach to the New Testament's use of the Old in its first-century interpretive environment". In Berding, Kenneth; Lunde, Jonathan (eds.). Three views on the New Testament use of the Old Testament. Counterpoints. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. pp.167–217. ISBN9780310590514. OCLC807233888.
——— (2012). "Pseudo-Solomon and His Scripture: Biblical Interpretation in the Wisdom of Solomon". In Henze, Matthias (ed.). A Companion to Biblical Interpretation in Early Judaism. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans. pp.389–414. ISBN9780802803887. OCLC780137278.
Journal articles
——— (1993). "Creation and Re-creation: Psalm 95 and its Interpretation in Hebrews 3:7-4:13]". Westminster Theological Journal. 55: 255–80.[31]
——— (1995). "A Retelling of the Song at the Sea in Wis 10,20-21". Biblica. 76: 1–24.
——— (Fall 2003). "Apostolic Hermeneutics and an Evangelical Doctrine of Scripture: Moving beyond the Modernist Impasse". Westminster Theological Journal. 65 (2): 263–287.[34]
——— (2005). "Some Thoughts on Theological Exegesis of the Old Testament: Toward a Viable Model of Biblical Coherence and Relevance". Reformation and Revival Journal. 14 (4): 81–104.[35]
——— (2007). "Response to Professor Greg Beale". Themelios. 32 (3): 5–13.
——— (2007). "Exodus, the Problem of Historiography, and Some Theological Reflections". Act 3 Review. 15 (4).[38]
——— (2007). "Preliminary Observations on an Incarnational Model of Scripture: Its Viability and Usefulness". Calvin Theological Journal. 42: 219–36.[39]
↑Enns, Peter (2005). Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic. p.13. ISBN0-8010-2730-6.
↑"Archived August 12, 2019, at the Wayback Machine " Westminster Board Statement, September 22, 2008
↑Withrow, Brandon; Wecker, Menachem (2014). Consider No Evil: Two Faith Traditions and the Problem of Academic Freedom in Religious Higher Education. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books. pp.90–94. ISBN9781620324899.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
