Retrocession Day

Last updated
Retrocession Day
19451025 Zhong Guo Zhan Qu Tai Wan Sheng Shou Jiang Dian Li Hou Tai Wan Sheng Jing Bei Zong Si Ling Bu Quan Ti Guan Bing He Ying .jpg
Observed byFlag of the Republic of China.svg  Republic of China
TypeHistorical, cultural, nationalist
Date25 October 1945
Frequencyannual
  1. "Taiwan's retrocession procedurally clear: Ma". The China Post . CNA. 26 October 2010. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 28 May 2014.
  2. Huang, Tai-lin (22 May 2014). "Lien's campaign TV ads to stress love for Taiwan". Taipei Times . p. 3. Archived from the original on 14 October 2013. Retrieved 28 May 2014.
  3. "Far East (Formosa and the Pescadores)". Hansard. 540 (cc1870–4). UK Parliament. 4 May 1955. Retrieved 1 September 2010. The sovereignty was Japanese until 1952. The Japanese Treaty came into force, and at that time Formosa was being administered by the Chinese Nationalists, to whom it was entrusted in 1945, as a military occupation.
  4. CIA (1949-03-14). "Probable Developments in Taiwan" (PDF). pp. 1–3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 September 2015. Retrieved 8 March 2015. From the legal standpoint, Taiwan is not part of the Republic of China. Pending a Japanese peace treaty, the island remains occupied territory......neither the US, or any other power, has formally recognized the annexation by China of Taiwan
  5. "William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States, Appellant v. Cheng Fu Sheng and Lin Fu Mei, Appellees, 280 F.2d 663 (D.C. Cir. 1960)". 1960. But in the view of our State Department, no agreement has 'purported to transfer the sovereignty of Formosa to (the Republic of) China.' At the present time, we accept the exercise of Chinese authority over Formosa, and recognize the Government of the Republic of China (the Nationalist Government) as the legal Government of China.
  6. Maurer, Ely. "Legal Problems Regarding Formosa and the Offshore Islands", Department of State Bulletin , Vol. 39, pp. 1005–1011 (December 22, 1958)(transcript of speech on November 20, 1958)("Neither this agreement [of April 28, 1952] nor any other agreement thereafter has purported to transfer the sovereignty of Formosa to [the Republic of] China....The situation is, then, one where the Allied Powers still have to come to some agreement or treaty with respect to the status of Formosa. Any action, therefore, of the Chinese Communist regime to seize Formosa constitutes an attempt to seize by force territory which does not belong to it.").
  7. Hung, Joe (7 December 2009). "Chen's shadow is getting eclipsed". The China Post. Archived from the original on 13 April 2014. Retrieved 8 December 2009.
  8. Ministry of Foreign Affairs clarifies legally binding status of Cairo Declaration” (January 21, 2014).
  9. United States Department of State (11 November 1950). "Sec. of State (Acheson) to Sec. of Defense (Marshall)". Foreign relations of the United States . Washington, DC: US GPO: 554–555. Archived from the original on 10 January 2015. Retrieved 9 January 2015.
  10. "Far East (Formosa and the Pescadores)", Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) , 4 May 1955, archived from the original on 2017-10-18, retrieved 2015-12-09
  11. 参議院会議録情報 第038回国会 予算委員会 第15号. 昭和36年3月15日. p. 19.
Retrocession Day
Traditional Chinese 臺灣光復節
Simplified Chinese 台湾光复节
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu Pinyin Táiwān guāngfùjié
Hakka
Romanization Thòi-vân kông fu̍k chiet
Southern Min
Tâi-lô Tâi-uân kong-ho̍k tseh
. 小坂善太郎:「ポツダム宣言には、カイロ宣言の条項は履行せらるべしということが書いてある。そうしてわれわれは降伏文書によって、ポツダム宣言の受諾を宣言したのであります。しかし、これは降伏文書というものは、休戦協定の性格を有するものでありまして、領土的処理を行ない得ない性質のものであるということを申し上げたのであります。」
  • Bullard, Monte R. (2008). Strait Talk: Avoiding a Nuclear War Between the US and China over Taiwan (PDF). Monterey, CA: James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS). p. 294. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-04-13.
  • Shirley A. Kan; Wayne M. Morrison (2014-12-11). "U.S.-Taiwan Relationship: Overview of Policy Issues" (PDF). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. p. 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-06-28. The United States has its own "one China" policy (vs. the PRC's "one China" principle) and position on Taiwan's status. Not recognizing the PRC's claim over Taiwan nor Taiwan as a sovereign state, U.S. policy has considered Taiwan's status as unsettled.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Lowther, William (9 June 2013). "CIA report shows Taiwan concerns". Taipei Times. p. 1. Archived from the original on 13 July 2013. Retrieved 10 June 2013. [Quoting from a declassified CIA report on Taiwan written in March 1949] From the legal standpoint, Taiwan is not part of the Republic of China. Pending a Japanese peace treaty, the island remains occupied territory in which the US has proprietary interests.
  • Ng, Yuzin Chiautong (1972). Historical and Legal Aspects of the International Status of Taiwan (Formosa) (2nd ed.). Tokyo: World United Formosans for Independence. LCCN   74165355. Archived from the original on 2015-11-17. Retrieved 2010-02-25.
  • 邱燕玲 (26 October 2005). "李筱峰︰台灣光復 中國無權慶祝". Liberty Times (in Chinese). Taipei. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  • Chung, Lawrence (26 October 2000). "Taipei govt downplays Retrocession Day". The Straits Times. Archived from the original on 29 August 2008. Retrieved 4 November 2007.
  • Hirsch, Max (26 October 2006). "Activists call for Retrocession Day national vacation". Taipei Times. p. 2. Archived from the original on 30 November 2006. Retrieved 4 November 2007.
  • Joint Chiefs of Staff (1945). General Order No. 1  via Wikisource. The above indicated commanders are the only representatives of the Allied Powers empowered to accept surrenders and all surrenders of Japanese Forces shall be made only to them or to their representatives.
  • 陳逸南 (28 July 2011). "受降非光復". Liberty Times (in Chinese). Taipei. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 10 September 2015.
  • 黃聖峰 (9 September 2015). "台灣光復從未發生". Apple Daily (in Chinese). Taipei. Archived from the original on 11 September 2015. Retrieved 10 September 2015.
  • "釐清歷史脈絡方知「光復節」的荒謬". Liberty Times (in Chinese). Taipei. 26 October 2011. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  • 王伯仁 (26 October 2015). "「台灣光復節」從張燈結綵到廢除爭議". Taiwan People News  [ zh ] (in Chinese). Taipei. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 13 May 2016.
  • Charney, Jonathan I.; Prescott, J.R.V. (July 2000). "Resolving Cross-Strait Relations between China and Taiwan". The American Journal of International Law. 94 (3): 453. doi:10.2307/2555319. JSTOR   2555319. S2CID   144402230. Archived from the original on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 1 March 2010. After occupying Taiwan in 1945 as a result of Japan's surrender, the Nationalists were defeated on the mainland in 1949, abandoning it to retreat to Taiwan. In that year the PRC was established.
  • Charney & Prescott (2000).