Ritual behavior in animals

Last updated

Animal faith is the study of animal behaviours that suggest proto-religious faith. It is commonly believed that religion and faith are unique to humans, [1] [2] [3] largely due to the typical dictionary definition of the word religion (see e.g. Wiktionary or Dictionary.com) requiring belief in a deity, which has not been observed in any animals. [4] However, by using a "non-anthropocentric and non-anthropomorphic prototype definition" of religion, such as the one developed by James Harrod in his 2011 work "A Trans-Species Definition of Religion," [5] scientists can study animal religious practices and behaviors.

Contents

Ritual behaviors are most commonly studied in chimpanzees [6] , elephants [7] , dolphins [8] , but such behaviors have also been observed in other animals, such as magpies [4] , crows [9] and orcas. [10]

Ritual behaviour in apes

Theologian and biologist Oliver Putz notes that, since chimpanzees are capable of moral agency, it is possible for Christians to understand them as having been made in the image of God. [11] Furthermore, Nancy R. Howell suggests that "chimpanzees and bonobos may have the precursors for culture and spirituality, such as connectedness, interdependence and sociality and a level of 'symbolic capacity'". [6] Primatologist Jane Goodall goes further, noting that some chimpanzees may "dance" at the onset of heavy rain or when they come across a waterfall. She speculates that "their 'elemental' displays are precursors of religious ritual". [12] [13]

Ritual behaviour in elephants

Pliny the Elder reported supposed elephant reverence for the celestial bodies:

The elephant is the largest of them all, and in intelligence approaches the nearest to man. It understands the language of its country, it obeys commands, and it remembers all the duties which it has been taught. It is sensible alike of the pleasures of love and glory, and, to a degree that is rare among men even, possesses notions of honesty, prudence, and equity; it has a religious respect also for the stars, and a veneration for the sun and the moon. [14]

Funeral rites in animals

While grief is common to many animals, funeral rituals are not. However, they are well documented in African elephants. [15]

Ronald K. Siegel writes that:

one cannot ignore the elaborate burying behaviour of elephants as a similar sign of ritualistic or even religious behaviour in that species. When encountering dead animals, elephants will often bury them with mud, earth and leaves. Animals known to have been buried by elephants include rhinos, buffalos, cows, calves, and even humans, in addition to elephants themselves. Elephants have [been] observed burying their dead with large quantities of food, fruit, flowers and colourful foliage. [16] [ clarification needed ]

Both wild and captive chimpanzees engage in ritualized behaviors at the death of a group member. These behaviors begin with group or individual silence, which may last for hours and followed by behaviors such as distinctive vocalizations; grooming the carcass; solemn visitation and gazing at the carcass by group members; displays; and lamentation-like whimpers or hoo-calls of distress. [6]

Attention to the dead is not unique to elephants or chimpanzees. Dolphins have been known to stay with recently deceased members of their pod for several days, preventing divers from getting close. [8] However, the reasons for this remain obscure. While scientists can observe their actions, the thought processes that motivate them are beyond current study. [17]

Tahlequah (a.k.a. J35), a female orca, carried the carcass of her new born infant for 17 days. [18] Whether this was a "tour of grief" or merely instinct is debated. [10]

Crows and other corvids also seem to participate in funeral-like ritualistic behavior, including gathering around and holding vigils over the carcass. [9] [19]

Relevance to the study of early modern humans

The ritual lives of animals are of interest to paleoanthropologists, as they provide a convenient insight into how religious belief systems may have developed in our ancestors. "The skeletal remains of Cro-Magnon man are found buried in the fetal position in line with the primitive myth that such a position facilitates rebirth. The study of allied behaviours in non-human animals provides an opportunity to understand their nature and function in man." [20] Indeed, some have seen superficial similarities between the funeral rituals of African elephants and the burial rituals of Neanderthals. [21]

Evolutionary psychologist Matt Rossano has theorised that religion evolved in three stages: In the pre-Upper Palaeolithic, religion was characterised by ecstatic rituals used to facilitate social bonding. Later, shamanic healing rituals developed in the Upper Palaeolithic. Finally, religious expressions developed over time to include cave art, ritual artefacts, ancestor worship and the development of myth and moral structures. [22] If this is true then the behaviour of chimpanzees witnessed by Goodall may be interpreted as similar to pre-Upper Palaeolithic Human religion. However, De Waal notes that bonobos show no evidence of ritual behaviour yet are extremely peaceful and demonstrate moral agency. This casts doubt on the co-development of morality and proto-religion. [23]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chimpanzee</span> Great ape native to the forest and savannah of tropical Africa

The chimpanzee, also simply known as the chimp, is a species of great ape native to the forests and savannahs of tropical Africa. It has four confirmed subspecies and a fifth proposed one. When its close relative the bonobo was more commonly known as the pygmy chimpanzee, this species was often called the common chimpanzee or the robust chimpanzee. The chimpanzee and the bonobo are the only species in the genus Pan. Evidence from fossils and DNA sequencing shows that Pan is a sister taxon to the human lineage and is thus humans' closest living relative. The chimpanzee is covered in coarse black hair, but has a bare face, fingers, toes, palms of the hands, and soles of the feet. It is larger and more robust than the bonobo, weighing 40–70 kg (88–154 lb) for males and 27–50 kg (60–110 lb) for females and standing 150 cm.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bonobo</span> Species of great ape

The bonobo, also historically called the pygmy chimpanzee, is an endangered great ape and one of the two species making up the genus Pan. While bonobos are, today, recognized as a distinct species in their own right, they were initially thought to be a subspecies of Pan troglodytes, due to the physical similarities between the two species. Taxonomically, members of the chimpanzee/bonobo subtribe Panina—composed entirely by the genus Pan—are collectively termed panins.

<i>Pan</i> (genus) Genus of African great apes

The genus Pan consists of two extant species: the chimpanzee and the bonobo. Taxonomically, these two ape species are collectively termed panins. The two species were formerly collectively called "chimpanzees" or "chimps"; if bonobos were recognized as a separate group at all, they were referred to as "pygmy" or "gracile chimpanzees". Together with humans, gorillas, and orangutans they are part of the family Hominidae. Native to sub-Saharan Africa, chimpanzees and bonobos are currently both found in the Congo jungle, while only the chimpanzee is also found further north in West Africa. Both species are listed as endangered on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, and in 2017 the Convention on Migratory Species selected the chimpanzee for special protection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Washoe (chimpanzee)</span> Chimpanzee research subject

Washoe was a female common chimpanzee who was the first non-human to learn to communicate using American Sign Language (ASL) as part of an animal research experiment on animal language acquisition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cetacean intelligence</span> Intellectual capacity of cetaceans

Cetacean intelligence is the overall intelligence and derived cognitive ability of aquatic mammals belonging in the infraorder Cetacea (cetaceans), including baleen whales, porpoises, and dolphins. In 2014, a study found for first time that the long-finned pilot whale has more neocortical neurons than any other mammal, including humans, examined to date.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frans de Waal</span> Dutch primatologist and ethologist (1948–2024)

Franciscus Bernardus Maria de Waal was a Dutch-American primatologist and ethologist. He was the Charles Howard Candler Professor of Primate Behavior in the Department of Psychology at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, director of the Living Links Center at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center at Emory, and author of numerous books including Chimpanzee Politics (1982) and Our Inner Ape (2005). His research centered on primate social behavior, including conflict resolution, cooperation, inequity aversion, and food-sharing. He was a member of the United States National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal language</span> Complex animal communication

Animal languages are forms of non-human animal communication that show similarities to human language. Animals communicate through a variety of signs, such as sounds and movements. Signing among animals may be considered a form of language if the inventory of signs is large enough. The signs are relatively arbitrary, and the animals seem to produce them with a degree of volition. In experimental tests, animal communication may also be evidenced through the use of lexigrams by chimpanzees and bonobos.

Ritualization refers to the process by which a sequence of non-communicating actions or an event is invested with cultural, social or religious significance. This definition emphasizes the transformation of everyday actions into rituals that carry deeper meaning within a cultural or religious context. Rituals are symbolic, repetitive, and often prescribed activities that hold religious or cultural significance for a certain group of people. They serve various purposes: promoting social solidarity by expressing shared values, facilitating the transmission of cultural knowledge and regulating emotions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mirror test</span> Animal self-awareness test to determine self-recognition in a mirror

The mirror test—sometimes called the mark test, mirror self-recognition (MSR) test, red spot technique, or rouge test—is a behavioral technique developed in 1970 by American psychologist Gordon Gallup Jr. as an attempt to determine whether an animal possesses the ability of visual self-recognition. The MSR test is the traditional method for attempting to measure physiological and cognitive self-awareness. However, agreement has been reached that animals can be self-aware in ways not measured by the mirror test, such as distinguishing between their own and others' songs and scents, and being aware of their own bodies, while humans have abnormally good vision, and thus intelligence that is highly visual.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elephant cognition</span> Intelligence and awareness in elephants

Elephant cognition is animal cognition as present in elephants. Most contemporary ethologists view the elephant as one of the world's most intelligent animals. With a mass of just over 5 kg (11 lb), an elephant's brain has more mass than that of any other land animal, and although the largest whales have body masses twenty times those of a typical elephant, a whale's brain is barely twice the mass of an elephant's brain. In addition, elephants have around 257 billion neurons. Elephant brains are similar to those of humans and many other mammals in terms of general connectivity and functional areas, with several unique structural differences. Although initially estimated to have as many neurons as a human brain, the elephant's brain has about three times the amount of neurons as a human brain. However, the elephant's cerebral cortex has about one-third of the number of neurons as a human's cerebral cortex.

The concept of the evolution of morality refers to the emergence of human moral behavior over the course of human evolution. Morality can be defined as a system of ideas about right and wrong conduct. In everyday life, morality is typically associated with human behavior rather than animal behavior. The emerging fields of evolutionary biology, and in particular evolutionary psychology, have argued that, despite the complexity of human social behaviors, the precursors of human morality can be traced to the behaviors of many other social animals. Sociobiological explanations of human behavior remain controversial. Social scientists have traditionally viewed morality as a construct, and thus as culturally relative, although others such as Sam Harris argue that there is an objective science of morality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paleolithic religion</span> Religions thought to have appeared during the Paleolithic time period

Paleolithic religions are a set of spiritual beliefs and practices that are theorized to have appeared during the Paleolithic time period. Paleoanthropologists Andre Leroi-Gourhan and Annette Michelson believe unmistakably religious behavior emerged by the Upper Paleolithic, before 30,000 years ago at the latest, but behavioral patterns such as burial rites that one might characterize as religious — or as ancestral to religious behavior — reach back into the Middle Paleolithic, as early as 300,000 years ago, coinciding with the first appearance of Homo neanderthalensis and possibly Homo naledi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tool use by non-humans</span>

Tool use by non-humans is a phenomenon in which a non-human animal uses any kind of tool in order to achieve a goal such as acquiring food and water, grooming, combat, defence, communication, recreation or construction. Originally thought to be a skill possessed only by humans, some tool use requires a sophisticated level of cognition. There is considerable discussion about the definition of what constitutes a tool and therefore which behaviours can be considered true examples of tool use. A wide range of animals, including mammals, birds, fish, cephalopods, and insects, are considered to use tools.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolutionary origin of religion</span> Emergence of religious behavior discussed in terms of natural evolution

The evolutionary origin of religion and religious behavior is a field of study related to evolutionary psychology, the origin of language and mythology, and cross-cultural comparison of the anthropology of religion. Some subjects of interest include Neolithic religion, evidence for spirituality or cultic behavior in the Upper Paleolithic, and similarities in great ape behavior.

Barbara Boardman Smuts is an American anthropologist and psychologist noted for her research into baboons, dolphins, and chimpanzees, and a Professor Emeritus at University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Laughter in animals</span> Overview of humor in animals

Laughter in animals other than humans describes animal behavior which resembles human laughter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dale Peterson</span> American author (born 1944)

Dale Peterson is an American author who writes about scientific and natural history subjects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Non-reproductive sexual behavior in animals</span> Non-reproductive behavior in non-human animals

Animal non-reproductive sexual behavior encompasses sexual activities that non-human animals participate in which do not lead to the reproduction of the species. Although procreation continues to be the primary explanation for sexual behavior in animals, recent observations on animal behavior have given alternative reasons for the engagement in sexual activities by animals. Animals have been observed to engage in sex for social interaction bonding, exchange for significant materials, affection, mentorship pairings, sexual enjoyment, or as demonstration of social rank. Observed non-procreative sexual activities include non-copulatory mounting, oral sex, genital stimulation, anal stimulation, interspecies mating, and acts of affection, although it is doubted that they have done this since the beginning of their existence. There have also been observations of sex with cub participants, same-sex sexual interaction, as well as sex with dead animals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cooperative pulling paradigm</span> Experimental design

The cooperative pulling paradigm is an experimental design in which two or more animals pull rewards toward themselves via an apparatus that they cannot successfully operate alone. Researchers use cooperative pulling experiments to try to understand how cooperation works and how and when it may have evolved.

Inequity aversion in animals is the willingness to sacrifice material pay-offs for the sake of greater equality, something humans tend to do from early age. It manifests itself through negative responses when rewards are not distributed equally between animals. In controlled experiments it has been observed, to varying degrees, in capuchin monkeys, chimpanzees, macaques, marmosets, dogs, wolves, rats, crows and ravens. No evidence of the effect was found in tests with orangutans, owl monkeys, squirrel monkeys, tamarins, kea, and cleaner fish. Based on mixed results in experimental studies it may be concluded that some bonobos, baboons, gibbons, and gorillas are inequity averse. Disadvantageous inequity aversion, which occurs when the animal protests as it gets a lesser reward than another animal, is most common. But advantageous inequity aversion has been observed as well, in chimpanzees, baboons and capuchins: the animal protests when it gets a better reward. Scientists believe that sensitivity to inequity co-evolved with the ability to cooperate, as it helps to sustain benefitting from cooperation. There is little evidence for inequity aversion in non-cooperative species.

References

  1. ↑ Coghlan, Andy (March 11, 2009). "Our sophisticated minds gave us religion" . New Scientist . Daily Mail and General Trust . Retrieved June 1, 2024. That a complex mind is required for religion may explain why faith is unique to humans
  2. ↑ Brooks, Michael (February 4, 2009). "Born believers: How your brain creates God" . New Scientist. Daily Mail and General Trust. Retrieved June 1, 2024.
  3. ↑ Auburn University (January 17, 2014). "Evidence of biological basis for religion in human evolution". Science Daily .
  4. 1 2 Pilcher, Helen. "Do any other animals have religion?". BBC Science Focus. Retrieved June 1, 2024. [Animals] don't worship, pray or believe in gods of any kind
  5. ↑ Harrod, JB. (2011). "A Trans-Species Definition of Religion". Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture . 5 (3): 327–353. doi:10.1558/jsrnc.v5i3.327.
  6. 1 2 3 Harrod, James B. (June 2014). "The Case for Chimpanzee Religion" (PDF). Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture. 8 (1): 8–45 – via religiousforums.com.
  7. ↑ Kaswan, Parveen; Roy, Akashdeep (February 26, 2024). "Unearthing calf burials among Asian Elephants Elephas maximus Linnaeus, 1758 (Mammalia: Proboscidea: Elephantidae) in northern Bengal, India". Journal of Threatened Taxa. doi:10.11609/jott.8826.16.2.24615-24629.
  8. 1 2 Ritter, F. (April 2007). "Behaviour Responses of Rough-toothed Dolphins to a Dead Newborn Calf" Archived 2018-11-18 at the Wayback Machine . Marine Mammal Science, pp.429–433.
  9. 1 2 "Why Crows Hold Funerals". Live Science . 6 January 2016.
  10. 1 2 "Grief or instinct: Interpreting a mother orca's actions | CBC News". CBC. Retrieved 2021-03-27.
  11. ↑ Putz, Oliver (August 2009). "Social Apes in God's Image: Moral Apes, Human Uniqueness, and the Image of God". Journal of Religion and Science. 44 (3). doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2009.01019.x.
  12. ↑ Goodall, Jane (2005). "Primate spirituality". In B. Taylor (ed.). The Encyclopaedia of Religion and Nature. New York: Thoemmes Continuum. pp. 1303–1306.
  13. ↑ King, Barbara J. (March 29, 2016). "Seeing Spirituality in Chimpanzees". The Atlantic . Emerson Collective . Retrieved June 1, 2024.
  14. ↑ Pliny, Natural History (VIII.1)
  15. ↑ Bekoff, Marc (October 29, 2009). "Grief in Animals". Psychology Today .
  16. ↑ Siegel, Ronald K. (October 1980). "The Psychology of Life After Death" (PDF). American Psychologist. 35 (10): 911–931. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 18, 2018.
  17. ↑ Dudzinski KM; Sakai M; Masaki K; Kogi K; Hishii T; Kurimoto M (2003). "Behavioural Observations of Bottle Nose Dolphins Towards Two Dead Conspecifics". Aquatic Mammals 29.1, pp.108–116.
  18. ↑ Darran Simon (2018-08-13). "'Tour of grief is over' for killer whale no longer carrying dead calf". CNN. Retrieved 2021-03-27.
  19. ↑ "Think Crow Funerals Are Strange? Wait Until You See the Wake". 23 July 2018.
  20. ↑ Siegal RK (1981). "Accounting for 'Afterlife' Experiences" Psychology Today, January p.4
  21. ↑ Sapolsky, Robert M. (2006) Monkeyluv: And other Essays on Our Lives as Animals. Scribner Book Co. p.189 ISBN   0-743-26015-5.
  22. ↑ Rossano MJ (2006). "The Religious Mind and the Evolution of Religion" Review of General Psychology, Vol 10(4) December pp346-364
  23. ↑ De Waal, Frans (2013) The Bonobo and the Atheist. W.W. Norton & Co., ISBN   978-0-393-07377-5
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.