Paleolithic religion

Last updated
Picture of a half-animal half-human in a Paleolithic cave painting in Dordogne, France. Gabillou Sorcier.png
Picture of a half-animal half-human in a Paleolithic cave painting in Dordogne, France.

Paleolithic religions are a set of spiritual beliefs and practices that are theorized to have appeared during the Paleolithic time period. Paleoanthropologists Andre Leroi-Gourhan and Annette Michelson believe unmistakably religious behavior emerged by the Upper Paleolithic, before 30,000 years ago at the latest, [1] but behavioral patterns such as burial rites [2] that one might characterize as religious — or as ancestral to religious behavior — reach back into the Middle Paleolithic, as early as 300,000 years ago, coinciding with the first appearance of Homo neanderthalensis and possibly Homo naledi .

Contents

Religious behavior is one of the hallmarks of behavioral modernity. There are several theories as to the moment this suite of behavioral characteristics fully coalesced. One theory links the germination of behavioral innovations to a cultural revolution among early modern humans, which coincided with their arrival to Europe 40,000 years ago. A variant of this model sees behavioral modernity as occurring gradually, beginning with the Middle Stone Age. According to a third theory, characteristics that define behavioral modernity are not unique to the Homo sapiens , but arose over a long period of time, among different human types, including Neanderthals. [3]

Lower Paleolithic

Religion prior to the Upper Paleolithic is speculative, [4] and the Lower Paleolithic in particular has no clear evidence of religious practice. [5] Not even the loosest evidence for ritual exists prior to 500,000 years before the present, though archaeologist Gregory J. Wightman notes the limits of the archaeological record means their practice cannot be thoroughly ruled out. [6] The early hominins of the Lower Paleolithic—an era well before the emergence of H. s. sapiens—slowly gained, as they began to collaborate and work in groups, the ability to control and mediate their emotional responses. Their rudimentary sense of collaborative identity laid the groundwork for the later social aspects of religion. [7]

Reconstructed Australopithecus sediba man Australopithecus sediba (Fundort Malapa).jpg
Reconstructed Australopithecus sediba man

Australopithecus, the first hominins, [note 1] were a pre-religious people. Though twentieth-century historian of religion Mircea Eliade felt that even this earliest branch on the human evolutionary line "had a certain spiritual awareness", the twenty-first century's understanding of Australopithecene cognition does not permit the level of abstraction necessary for spiritual experience. [4] [10] For all that the hominins of the Lower Paleolithic are read as incapable of spirituality, some writers read the traces of their behavior such as to permit an understanding of ritual, even as early as Australopithecus. Durham University professor of archaeology Paul Pettitt reads the AL 333 fossils, a group of Australopithecus afarensis found together near Hadar, Ethiopia, as perhaps deliberately moved to the area as a mortuary practice. [11] Later Lower Paleolithic remains have also been interpreted as bearing associations of funerary rites, particularly cannibalism. Though archaeologist Kit W. Wesler states "there is no evidence in the Lower Paleolithic of the kind of cultural elaboration that would imply a rich imagination or the level of intelligence of modern humans", he discusses the findings of Homo heidelbergensis bones at Sima de los Huesos and the evidence stretching from Germany to China for cannibal practices amongst Lower Paleolithic humans. [12]

A number of skulls found in archaeological excavations of Lower Paleolithic sites across diverse regions have had significant proportions of the brain cases broken away. Writers such as Hayden speculate that this marks cannibalistic tendencies of religious significance; Hayden, deeming cannibalism "the most parsimonious explanation", compares the behavior to hunter-gatherer tribes described in written records to whom brain-eating bore spiritual significance. By extension, he reads the skull's damage as evidence of Lower Paleolithic ritual practice. [13] For the opposite position, Wunn finds the cannibalism hypothesis bereft of factual backing; she interprets the patterns of skull damage as a matter of what skeletal parts are more or less preserved over the course of thousands or millions of years. Even within the cannibalism framework, she argues that the practice would be more comparable to brain-eating in chimpanzees than in hunter-gatherers. [4] In the 2010s, the study of Paleolithic cannibalism grew more complex due to new methods of archaeological interpretation, which led to the conclusion much Paleolithic cannibalism was for nutritional rather than ritual reasons. [14]

Venus of Berekhat Ram Venus of Berekhat Ram.jpg
Venus of Berekhat Ram

In the Upper Paleolithic, religion is associated with symbolism and sculpture. One Upper Paleolithic remnant that draws cultural attention are the Venus figurines, carved statues of nude women speculated to represent deities, fertility symbols, or ritual fetish objects. [15] Archaeologists have proposed the existence of Lower Paleolithic Venus figurines. The Venus of Berekhat Ram is one such highly speculative figure, a scoria dated 300–350 kya [note 2] with several grooves interpreted as resembling a woman's torso and head. Scanning electron microscopy found the Venus of Berekhat Ram's grooves consistent with those that would be produced by contemporary flint tools. Pettitt argues that though the figurine "can hardly be described as artistically achieved", it and other speculative Venuses of the Lower Paleolithic, such as the Venus of Tan-Tan, demand further scrutiny for their implications for contemporary theology. [18] These figurines were possibly produced by H. heidelbergensis, whose brain sizes were not far behind those of Neanderthals and H. s. sapiens, and have been analyzed for their implications for the artistic understanding of such early hominins. [19]

The tail end of the Lower Paleolithic saw a cognitive and cultural shift. The emergence of revolutionary technologies such as fire, coupled with the course of human evolution extending development to include a true childhood and improved bonding between mother and infant, perhaps broke new ground in cultural terms. It is in the last few hundred thousand years of the period that the archaeological record begins to demonstrate hominins as creatures that influence their environment as much as they are influenced by it. Later Lower Paleolithic hominins built wind shelters to protect themselves from the elements; they collected unusual natural objects; they began the use of pigments such as red ochre. These shifts do not coincide with species-level evolutionary leaps, being observed in both H. heidelbergensis and H. erectus. [20] Different authors interpret these shifts with different levels of skepticism, some seeing them as a spiritual revolution and others as simply the beginning of the beginning. While the full significance of these changes is difficult to discern, they clearly map to an advance in cognitive capacity in the directions that would eventually lead to religion. [4] [13] [20]

Middle Paleolithic

Pigment use

Incisions in a red ochre fragment from Blombos Blombo.jpg
Incisions in a red ochre fragment from Blombos

According to André Leroi-Gourhan, use of pigment is evidence of spiritual behavior, as its use serves no material purpose. [21] A great number of pigments has been found in both Neanderthal and early modern human sites. Particularly interesting is a painted mammoth molar from Tata, Hungary, associated with Neanderthals. The main side of the mammoth molar was painted in red ochre, while the back side of it showed heavy traces of use. [22] In Blombos cave, two ochre fragments have been found, which bear engraved geometric patterns. [23]

Burials

Graves are the clearest signs of spiritual behavior, as it shows delineation between the world of the living and the world of the dead. Most often, archaeologists will seek to find some form of grave goods, pigment use, or other forms of symbolic behavior to differentiate from burials motivated by other reasons, such as hygiene. [24] Examples of such burials are La Chapelle-aux-Saints 1, [25] Le Regourdou, [26] Shanidar 4, [27] and Teshik-Tash 1, [28] among others.

Ritual cannibalism

Eating the flesh of deceased in order to inherit their qualities or honor them is a practice that has been noted in numerous modern societies, such as the Wariʼ people, [29] and evidence of it may be found in middle Paleolithic as well.

Ritual cannibalism has been suggested for the Krapina Neanderthals, based on three factors: mixing of animals and human skeletal remains, breaking of long bones (in order to access the marrow), and the fact that not a single skull was found in a non-broken state. Although controversial, the idea of possible cannibalism was supported by a number of subsequent scientists, such as Mirko Malez, H. Ulrich and K. Tomić Karlović. [30] Neanderthal cannibalism has also been noted in Vindija cave, [31] Moula-Guercy, [32] and possibly in Combe Grenal [33] and Hortus. [34]

Ritual cannibalism has been noted among the early modern humans of the Klasies River Caves, who consumed other anatomically modern humans. Evidence of it has been found at the Les Rois site as well, where early modern humans consumed the flesh of neanderthals. [35]

Skull cult

The idea of a skull cult among the prehistoric people was popular throughout the 20th century, however, subsequent research and re-analysis disproved most of such theories. [36]

The frontal bone of the Krapina 3 cranium has 35 incisions, which cannot be explained through cannibalism, but may be the result of natural processes. [37] At Vindija Cave, only skull and mandible fragments were found, which Mirko Malez has interpreted as purposeful selection. Cuts and incisions seen on them may be a consequence of defleshing. [38]

Bear cult

Numerous cave bear skulls were found alongside evidence of human habitation in Middle Paleolithic caves, which lead scientists to assume the existence of a bear cult. The bones were most often of cave bears and more rarely of brown bears. [39] The skulls were placed in a cave niche or other prominent places, presumably for worship. Aside from human activity, the position can also be explained through animal activity or natural processes. [40]

Upper Paleolithic

Upper Paleolithic began about 40 000 BP in Europe, and slightly earlier in Africa and the Levant. Use of pigment and the practice of burial extends into this period, with the addition of cave art and portable art. The upper paleolithic is the prehistoric period during which the symbolic and modern behavior is fully developed. [41]

Cave art

According to Richard Klein, the art and burial of the upper paleolithic is the first clear and undeniable proof of an ideological system. The art can be divided into two types: the cave art such as paintings, engravings and reliefs on stone walls, and portable art. [36]

Horses found in the Chauvet cave Chauvethorses.jpg
Horses found in the Chauvet cave

Although first evidence of it was discovered in Europe, the earliest cave art was created in Australia and Southeast Asia. [42] The oldest cave art so far discovered, is from the island of Sulawesi in Indonesia, dated to 45 500 BP, depicting a warty pig and hand traces. [43] Famous examples of cave art include the oldest figurative depictions in Europe found in Chauvet cave, Romuald’s Cave and Fumane Cave, while the most famous examples are found in the cave of Altamira and Lascaux. Cave art isn't confined to Europe, as examples of it can be found in Australia and Asia as well. Non-painted art exists as well, i.e. the Venus of Laussel which was carved into the limestone wall. [44]

The idea of art for art's sake, which was held by some archaeologists in the past, [45] has today largely been abandoned. [46] Totemism was another explanation, which was later abandoned. If the animals were totems, they wouldn't have been depicted as injured. Furthermore, there aren't gatherings of animals around any specific depictions, as would have been the case if they were totems. The art may have been part of a ritual to increase hunting success. Through the depictions of these animals, the prehistoric man would have attempted to gain power over them. Another explanation is that the magic could have been aimed at increasing the number of the depicted animals, which were vital for the survival of the upper paleolithic humans. [47]

Andre Leroi-Gourhan saw these depictions as a reflection of the natural and supernatural ordering of the world through sexual symbolism. Certain animals (i.e. the bison) were connected to female values and other to male values (i.e. the horse). These interpretations are based on subjective interpretations of modern humans, which don't necessarily reflect the worldviews of the prehistoric peoples. [48]

The Sorcerer from Trois-Freres The Sorcerer cave art. Sketch of Breuil's drawing. Photograph. Wellcome M0008769.jpg
The Sorcerer from Trois-Frères

Shamanism is another popular explanation. The caves would as such represent entrances to the spiritual realm in which one can communicate with spiritual beings. Many of the animals depicted in cave art aren't depicted as hunted, as part of hunting magic. Their depictions would serve to give the shaman their strength and traits to help him during his hallucination, when he would communicate with the supernatural powers. The half-animal, half-man depictions, as for example the Trois-Frères sorcerer, would represent the Lord of Animals. [47] Depictions of women in cave art suggests their participation in these rituals, [49] perhaps through dance accompanied by music. [50]

Portable art

Kozlowski saw animal carvings as connected to hunting magic, aimed at increasing success. [49] Especially interesting are the Venus figurines. They are figurines of women, with accentuated curves, either naked or partly dressed, wearing necklaces, bracelets or tattoos, and without a face. They are present from the Pyrenees to the Don river.

They could have represented fertility goddesses, connected to giving and protecting life, as well as with death and rebirth. [51] Other explanations see these figurines as pornography, [52] auto-portraits [53] or depictions of important women in the tribe. They may have symbolized the hope for prosperous and well-nourished communities. [54]

The Löwenmensch figurine is a sculpture of a human with a lion's head dated to 35,000 –40,000 years old. It may have represented a deity. [55]

Burials and pigment use

Based on the grave goods found beside the deceased, upper paleolithic burials are undoubtedly evidence of spirituality and religiousness. Pigments of various kinds are found in great amounts in various sites across Europe. The graves best illustrating this are described below:

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Predating even Australopithecus was Ardipithecus, which is conceptualized as a hominin by some authors, but whose place in the lineage is a matter of dispute. [8] [9]
  2. ↑ The precise timeframe of the Venus of Berekhat Ram is unclear. It was between 230,000 and 780,000 years ago, [16] as determined by the age of the layers of volcanic ash it was found embedded in. [17]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paleolithic</span> Prehistoric period, first part of the Stone Age

The Paleolithic or Palaeolithic, also called the Old Stone Age, is a period in human prehistory that is distinguished by the original development of stone tools, and which represents almost the entire period of human prehistoric technology. It extends from the earliest known use of stone tools by hominins, c. 3.3 million years ago, to the end of the Pleistocene, c. 11,650 cal BP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shanidar Cave</span> Iraq site of Neanderthal remains

Shanidar Cave is an archaeological site on Bradost Mountain, within the Zagros Mountains in the Erbil Governorate of Kurdistan Region in northern Iraq. Neanderthal remains were discovered here in 1953, including Shanidar 1, who survived several injuries, possibly due to care from others in his group, and Shanidar 4, the famed 'flower burial'. Until this discovery, Cro-Magnons, the earliest known H. sapiens in Europe, were the only individuals known for purposeful, ritualistic burials.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Behavioral modernity</span> Transition of human species to anthropologically modern behavior

Behavioral modernity is a suite of behavioral and cognitive traits believed to distinguish current Homo sapiens from other anatomically modern humans, hominins, and primates. Most scholars agree that modern human behavior can be characterized by abstract thinking, planning depth, symbolic behavior, music and dance, exploitation of large game, and blade technology, among others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Venus figurine</span> Prehistoric statuettes depicting women

A Venus figurine is any Upper Palaeolithic statue portraying a woman, usually carved in the round. Most have been unearthed in Europe, but others have been found as far away as Siberia and distributed across much of Eurasia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mousterian</span> European Middle Paleolithic culture

The Mousterian is an archaeological industry of stone tools, associated primarily with the Neanderthals in Europe, and to the earliest anatomically modern humans in North Africa and West Asia. The Mousterian largely defines the latter part of the Middle Paleolithic, the middle of the West Eurasian Old Stone Age. It lasted roughly from 160,000 to 40,000 BP. If its predecessor, known as Levallois or Levallois-Mousterian, is included, the range is extended to as early as c. 300,000–200,000 BP. The main following period is the Aurignacian of Homo sapiens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aurignacian</span> Upper Paleolithic culture of Europe

The Aurignacian is an archaeological industry of the Upper Paleolithic associated with Early European modern humans (EEMH) lasting from 43,000 to 26,000 years ago. The Upper Paleolithic developed in Europe some time after the Levant, where the Emiran period and the Ahmarian period form the first periods of the Upper Paleolithic, corresponding to the first stages of the expansion of Homo sapiens out of Africa. They then migrated to Europe and created the first European culture of modern humans, the Aurignacian.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gravettian</span> Archaeological industry of the European Upper Paleolithic

The Gravettian was an archaeological industry of the European Upper Paleolithic that succeeded the Aurignacian circa 33,000 years BP. It is archaeologically the last European culture many consider unified, and had mostly disappeared by c. 22,000 BP, close to the Last Glacial Maximum, although some elements lasted until c. 17,000 BP. In Spain and France, it was succeeded by the Solutrean and by the Epigravettian in Italy, the Balkans, Ukraine and Russia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Upper Paleolithic</span> Subdivision of the Paleolithic or Old Stone Age

The Upper Paleolithic is the third and last subdivision of the Paleolithic or Old Stone Age. Very broadly, it dates to between 50,000 and 12,000 years ago, according to some theories coinciding with the appearance of behavioral modernity in early modern humans, until the advent of the Neolithic Revolution and agriculture.

The Middle Paleolithic is the second subdivision of the Paleolithic or Old Stone Age as it is understood in Europe, Africa and Asia. The term Middle Stone Age is used as an equivalent or a synonym for the Middle Paleolithic in African archeology. The Middle Paleolithic broadly spanned from 300,000 to 50,000 years ago. There are considerable dating differences between regions. The Middle Paleolithic was succeeded by the Upper Paleolithic subdivision which first began between 50,000 and 40,000 years ago. Pettit and White date the Early Middle Paleolithic in Great Britain to about 325,000 to 180,000 years ago, and the Late Middle Paleolithic as about 60,000 to 35,000 years ago. The Middle Paleolithic was in the geological Chibanian and Late Pleistocene ages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dolní Věstonice (archaeological site)</span> Archaeological site in the Czech Republic

Dolní Věstonice is an Upper Paleolithic archaeological site near the village of Dolní Věstonice in the South Moravian Region of the Czech Republic, at the base of Mount Děvín, 550 metres (1,800 ft). It dates to approximately 26,000 BP, as supported by radiocarbon dating. The site is unique in that it has been a particularly abundant source of prehistoric artifacts dating from the Gravettian period, which spanned roughly from 27,000 to 20,000 BC. In addition to the abundance of art, this site also includes carved representations of men, women, and animals, along with personal ornaments, human burials and enigmatic engravings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Teshik-Tash 1</span> Archaeological site in Uzbekistan

Teshik-Tash 1 is a Neanderthal skeleton discovered in 1938 in Teshik-Tash Cave, in the Bajsuntau mountain range, Uzbek SSR (Uzbekistan), Central Asia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grotte du Renne</span> Cave in France and significant archaeological site

The Grotte du Renne is one of the many caves at Arcy-sur-Cure in France, an archaeological site of the Middle/Upper Paleolithic period in the Yonne departement, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté. It contains Châtelperronian lithic industry and Neanderthal remains. Grotte du Renne has been argued to provide the best evidence that Neanderthals developed aspects of modern behaviour before contact with modern humans, but this has been challenged by radiological dates, which suggest mixing of later human artifacts with Neanderthal remains. However, it has also been argued that the radiometric dates have been affected by post-recovery contamination, and statistical testing suggests the association between Neanderthal remains, Châtelperronian artefacts and personal ornaments is genuine, not the result of post-depositional processes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Art of the Upper Paleolithic</span> Oldest form of prehistoric art

The art of the Upper Paleolithic represents the oldest form of prehistoric art. Figurative art is present in Europe and Southeast Asia, beginning around 50,000 years ago. Non-figurative cave paintings, consisting of hand stencils and simple geometric shapes, are somewhat older, at least 40,000 years old, and possibly as old as 64,000 years. This latter estimate is due to a controversial 2018 study based on uranium-thorium dating, which would imply Neanderthal authorship and qualify as art of the Middle Paleolithic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cro-Magnon</span> Earliest anatomically modern humans in Europe

Cro-Magnons or European early modern humans (EEMH) were the first early modern humans to settle in Europe, migrating from western Asia, continuously occupying the continent possibly from as early as 56,800 years ago. They interacted and interbred with the indigenous Neanderthals of Europe and Western Asia, who went extinct 40,000 to 35,000 years ago. The first wave of modern humans in Europe left no genetic legacy to modern Europeans; however, from 37,000 years ago a second wave succeeded in forming a single founder population, from which all subsequent Cro-Magnons descended and which contributes ancestry to present-day Europeans. Cro-Magnons produced Upper Palaeolithic cultures, the first major one being the Aurignacian, which was succeeded by the Gravettian by 30,000 years ago. The Gravettian split into the Epi-Gravettian in the east and Solutrean in the west, due to major climatic degradation during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), peaking 21,000 years ago. As Europe warmed, the Solutrean evolved into the Magdalenian by 20,000 years ago, and these peoples recolonised Europe. The Magdalenian and Epi-Gravettian gave way to Mesolithic cultures as big game animals were dying out and the Last Glacial Period drew to a close.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Skhul and Qafzeh hominins</span> Hominin fossils

The Skhul and Qafzeh hominins or Qafzeh–Skhul early modern humans are hominin fossils discovered in Es-Skhul and Qafzeh caves in Israel. They are today classified as Homo sapiens, among the earliest of their species in Eurasia. Skhul Cave is on the slopes of Mount Carmel; Qafzeh Cave is a rockshelter near Nazareth in Lower Galilee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neanderthal behavior</span> Behavior of Neanderthal people

The details about Neanderthal behaviour remain highly controversial. From their physiology, Neanderthals are presumed to have been omnivores, but animal protein formed the majority of their dietary protein, showing them to have been carnivorous apex predators and not scavengers. Although very little is known of their social organization, it appears patrilines would make up the nucleus of the tribe, and women would seek out partners in neighbouring tribes once reaching adolescence, presumably to avoid inbreeding. An analysis based on finger-length ratios suggests that Neanderthals were more sexually competitive and promiscuous than modern-day humans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Krapina Neanderthal site</span> Archaeological site in Croatia

Krapina Neanderthal site, also known as Hušnjakovo Hill is a Paleolithic archaeological site located near Krapina, Croatia.

The diet of known human ancestors varies dramatically over time. Strictly speaking, according to evolutionary anthropologists and archaeologists, there is not a single hominin Paleolithic diet. The Paleolithic covers roughly 2.8 million years, concurrent with the Pleistocene, and includes multiple human ancestors with their own evolutionary and technological adaptations living in a wide variety of environments. This fact with the difficulty of finding conclusive evidence often makes broad generalizations of the earlier human diets very difficult. Humans' pre-hominin primate ancestors were broadly herbivorous, relying on either foliage or fruits and nuts and the shift in dietary breadth during the Paleolithic is often considered a critical point in hominin evolution. A generalization between Paleolithic diets of the various human ancestors that many anthropologists do make is that they are all to one degree or another omnivorous and are inextricably linked with tool use and new technologies.

Qafzeh Cave, also known by other names, is a prehistoric archaeological site located at the bottom of Mount Precipice in the Jezreel Valley of Lower Galilee south of Nazareth. Important remains of prehistoric people were discovered on the site - some of the oldest examples in the world, outside of Africa, of virtually anatomically modern human beings. These were discovered on the ledge just outside the cave, where 18 layers from the Middle Paleolithic era were identified. The interior of the cave contains layers ranging from the Neolithic era to the Bronze Age.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prehistoric religion</span> Religion before written records

Prehistoric religion is the religious practice of prehistoric cultures. Prehistory, the period before written records, makes up the bulk of human experience; over 99% of human experience occurred during the Paleolithic period alone. Prehistoric cultures spanned the globe and existed for over two and a half million years; their religious practices were many and varied, and the study of them is difficult due to the lack of written records describing the details of their faiths.

References

  1. ↑ Andre Leroi-Gourhan and Annette Michelson, "The Religion of the Caves: Magic or Metaphysics?", The MIT Press, Vol, 37, October 1986, pp. 6–17. "cave art born 30,000 years before our era ... would appear to have developed simultaneously with the first explicit manifestations of concern with the supernatural." (p. 6)
  2. ↑ Arenas del Amo, Sergio; Armentano Oller, Núria; Daura, Joan; Sanz, Montserrat (February 2024). "Overview of the European Upper Palaeolithic: The Homo sapiens bone record". Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 53: 104391. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104391 . ISSN   2352-409X.
  3. ↑ d'Errico, Francesco (August 2003). "The Invisible Frontier. A Multiple Species Model for the Origin of Behavioral Modernity". Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. 12 (4): 188–189. doi:10.1002/evan.10113. S2CID   1904963 . Retrieved 24 January 2021.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Wunn I (2000). "Beginning of Religion". Numen. 47 (4): 417–452. doi:10.1163/156852700511612.
  5. ↑ Hayden, Brian (17 December 2003). "The Primal Paleolithic". Shamans, Sorcerers, and Saints: A Prehistory of Religion. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books. p. 90. ISBN   9781588341686.
  6. ↑ Wightman, Gregory J (18 December 2014). "The Emergence of Religious Ritual". The Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 222. ISBN   9781442242890.
  7. ↑ Wightman, Gregory J (18 December 2014). "The Emergence of Religious Ritual". The Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 222–223. ISBN   9781442242890.
  8. ↑ Sarmiento EE (28 May 2010). "Comment on the Paleobiology and Classification of Ardipithecus ramidus". Science. 328 (5982): 1105. Bibcode:2010Sci...328.1105S. doi: 10.1126/science.1184148 . PMID   20508113.
  9. ↑ Stanford CB (October 2012). "Chimpanzees and the Behavior of Ardipithecus ramidus". Annual Review of Anthropology. 41 (1): 139–149. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145724.
  10. ↑ Rappaport MB, Corbally C (March 2018). "Evolution of religious capacity in the genus Homo: cognitive time sequence". Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science. 53 (1): 159–197. doi:10.1111/zygo.12387. hdl: 10150/628192 .
  11. ↑ Pettitt, Paul (October 2011). "Religion and Ritual in the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic". In Insoll, Timothy (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. p. 336. ISBN   9780199232444.
  12. ↑ Wesler, Kit W (2012). "Grave Issues". An Archaeology of Religion. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America. p. 34. ISBN   9780761858454.
  13. 1 2 Hayden, Brian (17 December 2003). "The Primal Paleolithic". Shamans, Sorcerers, and Saints: A Prehistory of Religion. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books. pp. 95–97. ISBN   9781588341686.
  14. ↑ Cole J (6 April 2017). "Assessing the calorific significance of episodes of human cannibalism in the Palaeolithic". Scientific Reports. 7 (7): 44707. Bibcode:2017NatSR...744707C. doi: 10.1038/srep44707 . PMC   5382840 . PMID   28383521.
  15. ↑ Liew, Jessica (10 July 2017). "Venus Figurine". World History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 3 June 2021.
  16. ↑ Pettitt, Paul (October 2011). "Religion and Ritual in the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic". In Insoll, Timothy (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. p. 333. ISBN   9780199232444.
  17. ↑ Patowary, Kaushik (13 October 2016). "Venus of Berekhat Ram: The World's Oldest Piece of Art That Predates Humans". Amusing Planet. Retrieved 4 June 2021.
  18. ↑ Pettitt, Paul (October 2011). "Religion and Ritual in the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic". In Insoll, Timothy (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 333–335. ISBN   9780199232444.
  19. ↑ Morriss-Kay GM (February 2010). "The evolution of human artistic creativity". Journal of Anatomy. 216 (2): 158–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01160.x . PMC   2815939 . PMID   19900185.
  20. 1 2 Wightman, Gregory J (18 December 2014). "The Emergence of Religious Ritual". The Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 224–226. ISBN   9781442242890.
  21. ↑ Karavanić, Ivor (2012). Prapočetci religije: Simbolika i duhovnost u paleolitiku. Zagreb: Školska knjiga. p. 41. ISBN   978-953-0-61495-6.
  22. ↑ Schwarcz, H. P.; Skoflek, I. (18 February 1982). "New dates for the Tata, Hungary archaeological site". Nature. 295 (5850): 590–591. Bibcode:1982Natur.295..590S. doi:10.1038/295590a0. S2CID   4338669 . Retrieved 23 January 2021.
  23. ↑ Henshilwood, Christopher S.; d'Errico, Francesco; Yates, Royden; Jacobs, Zenobia; Tribolo, Chantal; Duller, Geoff A. T.; Mercier, Norbert; Sealy, Judith C.; Valladas, Helene; Watts, Ian; Wintle, Ann G. (15 Feb 2002). "Emergence of Modern Human Behavior: Middle Stone Age Engravings from South Africa". Science. 295 (5558): 1278–1280. Bibcode:2002Sci...295.1278H. doi:10.1126/science.1067575. PMID   11786608. S2CID   31169551 . Retrieved 23 January 2021.
  24. ↑ Milićević Bradač, Marina (2002). "The living, the dead, and the graves". Histria Antiqua. 8: 53–62.
  25. ↑ Stringer, Clive; Gamble, Clive (1993). In Search of the Neanderthals . Thames and Hudson. p.  159. ISBN   978-0500278079.
  26. ↑ Gargett, Robert H. (April 1989). "Grave Shortcomings: The Evidence for Neandertal Burial [and Comments and Reply]" (PDF). Current Anthropology. 30 (2): 157–190. doi:10.1086/203725. S2CID   146781901 . Retrieved 23 January 2021.[ dead link ]
  27. ↑ Arlette Leroi-Gourhan, Shanidar et ses fleurs, Paléorient, vol. 24, pp. 79–88, 1998
  28. ↑ Glantz, Michelle; Viola, Bence; Wrinn, Patrick; Chikisheva, Tatiana; Derevianko, Anatoly; Krivoshapkin, Andrei; Islamov, Uktur; Suleimanov, Rustam; Ritzman, Terrence (August 2008). "New hominin remains from Uzbekistan" (PDF). Journal of Human Evolution. 55 (2): 223–237. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.12.007. PMID   18499228 . Retrieved 23 January 2021.[ dead link ]
  29. ↑ Robben, A.C.G.M. "Death and Anthropology: An Introduction". In Robben, A.C.G.M. (ed.). Death, Mourning and Burial: A Cross-cultural Reader. Hoboken, New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. pp. 1–16.
  30. ↑ Karavanić, Ivor (1993). "Kanibalizam ili mogućnost religijske svijesti u krapinskih neandertalaca". Obnovljeni Život: časopis za filozofiju i religijske znanosti. 48 (1): 100–102. Retrieved 18 January 2021.
  31. ↑ Karavanić, Ivor; Patou-Mathis, Marylène (2009). "Middle/Upper Paleolithic interface in Vindija Cave (Croatia): New Results and interpretations". In Camps, M.; Chauhan, P.R. (eds.). Sourcebook of Paleolithic Transitions: Methods, theories and interpretations. New York: Springer.
  32. ↑ Defleur, A.; White, T.; Valensi, P.; Slimak, L.; Crégut-Bonnoure, E. (1 October 1999). "Neanderthal cannibalism at Moula-Guercy, Ardèche, France". Science. 286 (5437): 128–131. doi:10.1126/science.286.5437.128. PMID   10506562 . Retrieved 23 January 2021.
  33. ↑ Garralda, Maria Dolores; Giacobini, Giacomo (January 2005). "Cutmarks on the Combe-Grenal and Marillac Neandertals. A SEM analysis". L'Anthropologie. 43. Retrieved 23 January 2021.
  34. ↑ de Lumley, H.; de Lumley, M.A.; Brandi, R.; Guerrier, E.; Pillard, F.; Pillard, B. (1972). "Haltes et campements de chasseurs néandertaliens dans la grotte l'Hortus (Valflaunes, Herault)". In de Lumley, H. (ed.). Etudes Quaternaires. Marseille: Laboratoire de Paléontologie Humaine et de Préhistoire. pp. 527–623.
  35. ↑ McKie, Robin (16 May 2009). "How Neanderthals met a grisly fate: devoured by humans". theguardian.com. Retrieved 23 January 2021.
  36. 1 2 Klein, Richard (1999). Human Career. Chicago: University of Chicago. ISBN   978-0226439655.
  37. ↑ Frayer, David W.; Orschiedt, Jörg; Cook, Jill; Russell, Mary Doria; Radovčić, Jakov (2006). "Krapina 3: Cut Marks and Ritual Behavior?" (PDF). Periodicum Biologorum. 108. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
  38. ↑ Malez, Mirko (1985). "Spilja Vindija kao kultno mjesto neandertalaca". Godišnjak Gradskog muzeja Varaždin. 7 (7). Retrieved 24 January 2021.
  39. ↑ Howell, Francis Clark (1968). Early Man. New York: Time-Life Books. ISBN   9780705401227.
  40. ↑ Binford, Lewis (1981). Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths. Orlando: Academic Press Inc.
  41. ↑ Karavanić, Ivor (2012). Prapočetci religije: Simbolika i duhovnost u paleolitiku. Zagreb: Školska knjiga. pp. 80–81. ISBN   978-953-0-61495-6.
  42. ↑ Bahn, Paul (1995). "New developments in Pleistocene art". Evolutionary Anthropology. 4 (6): 204–215. doi:10.1002/evan.1360040604. S2CID   86322294 . Retrieved 25 January 2021.
  43. ↑ Brumm, Adam; Oktaviana, Adhi Agus; Burhan, Basran; Hakim, Budianto; Lebe, Rustan; Zhao, Jian-xin; Sulistyarto, Priyatno Hadi; Ririmasse, Marlon; Adhityatama, Shinatria; Sumantri, Iwan; Aubert, Maxime (13 January 2021). "Oldest cave art found in Sulawesi". Science Advances. 7 (3): eabd4648. Bibcode:2021SciA....7.4648B. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd4648 . PMC   7806210 . PMID   33523879.
  44. ↑ Thompson, William Irwin. (1981). The time falling bodies take to light: mythology, sexuality, and the origins of culture. New York: St. Martin's Press. p. 105. ISBN   0-312-80510-1. OCLC   6890108.
  45. ↑ Halverson, John; Abrahamian, Levon; Adams, Kathleen; Bahn, Paul; Black, Lydia; Davis, Whitney; Frost, Robin; Layton, Robert; Lewis-Williams, David; Llamazares, Ana Maria; Maynard, Patrick; Stenhouse, David (February 1987). "Art for Art's Sake in the Paleolithic [and Comments and Reply]". Current Anthropology. 28 (1): 63–89. doi:10.1086/203491. JSTOR   2743113. S2CID   147269806 . Retrieved 25 January 2021.
  46. ↑ Karavanić, Ivor (2012). Prapočetci religije: Simbolika i duhovnost u paleolitiku. Zagreb: Školska knjiga. p. 91. ISBN   978-953-0-61495-6.
  47. 1 2 Lewis-Williams, David; Clottes, Jean (1998). The Shamans of Prehistory: Trance and magic in painted caves. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.
  48. ↑ Abadia, Oscar Moro; Palacio-Pérez, Eduardo (May 2015). "Rethinking the Structural Analysis of Palaeolithic Art: New Perspectives on Leroi-Gourhan's Structuralism". Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 25 (3): 657–672. doi:10.1017/S0959774315000086 . Retrieved 25 January 2021.
  49. 1 2 Kozlowski, Janusz (2004). "Religiozni osjećaj tijekom prapovijesti: gornji paleolitik". In Vandermeersch, Bernard; Kozlowski, Janusz; Gumbutas, Marija; Facchini, Fiorenzo (eds.). Religioznost u prapovijesti. Zagreb: Kršćanska sadašnjost.
  50. ↑ Reznikoff, Iegor (June 2008). "Sound resonance in prehistoric times: A study of Paleolithic painted caves and rocks". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 123 (5): 3603. Bibcode:2008ASAJ..123.3603R. doi:10.1121/1.2934773 . Retrieved 25 January 2021.
  51. ↑ Burkert, Walter (1979). Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 88–89.
  52. ↑ Absolon, Karel (1949). "The Diluvial Anthropomorphic Statuettes and Drawings, Especially the So-Called Venus Statuettes, Discovered in Moravia: A Comparative Study". Artibus Asiae. 12 (3): 201–220. doi:10.2307/3248385. JSTOR   3248385 . Retrieved 25 January 2021.
  53. ↑ McDermott, LeRoy (April 1996). "Self-Representation in Upper Paleolithic Female Figurines". Current Anthropology. 37 (2): 227–275. doi:10.1086/204491. S2CID   144914396 . Retrieved 25 January 2021.
  54. ↑ Dixson, Alan (January 2011). "Venus Figurines of the European Paleolithic: Symbols of Fertility or Attractiveness?" (PDF). Journal of Anthropology. 2011: 1–11. doi: 10.1155/2011/569120 . Retrieved 25 January 2021.
  55. ↑ , Martin Bailey Ice Age Lion Man is the world’s earliest figurative sculpture The Art Newspaper, 31 January 2013, accessed 1 February 2013. Archived 2015-02-15 at the Wayback Machine
  56. 1 2 Aldhouse-Green, Miranda; Aldhouse-Green, Stephen (13 June 2005). The Quest for the Shaman: Shape-Shifters, Sorcerers and Spirit-healers of Ancient Europe. London: Thames and Hudson Ltd.
  57. ↑ Svoboda, Jiří (2006). "The Burials: Ritual and Taphonomy". In Svoboda, Jiří; Trinkaus, Erik (eds.). Early Modern Human Evolution in Central Europe: The people of Dolni Vestonice and Pavlov. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  58. ↑ White, Randall (2006). "Technological and social dimensions of "Aurignacian-age" body ornaments across Europe". In Knecht, Heidi; Piketay, Anne; White, Randall (eds.). Before Lascaux: The Complex Record of the Early Upper Paleolithic. Boca Raton: CRC Pres. pp. 277–299.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.