Jainism is an ancient Indian religion belonging to the Śramaṇa tradition. Jains trace their history through a lineage of twenty-four tirthankaras (ford-makers), revering Rishabhanatha as the first in the present time-cycle. While tradition considers the dharma eternal, scholarly consensus places its verifiable historical roots in the 9th–8th century BCE, with the last two tirthankaras, Parshvanatha (c. 9th-8th c. BCE) and Mahāvīra (c. 6th c. BCE), widely accepted as historical figures. Mahāvīra is viewed by scholars not as a founder, but as a reformer of the pre-existing community established by Parshvanatha.
The Classical Age (c. 7th–13th c. CE) saw significant patronage, particularly in the Deccan under dynasties like the Chalukyas, Rashtrakutas, and Western Gangas, leading to the creation of major literary works (Adi Purana) and monuments like the Gommateshwara statue at Shravanabelagola. In Western India, the Chaulukyas were notable patrons, supporting scholars like Hemachandra and ministers who built the Dilwara Temples. The gradual schism between the two main sects, Digambara and Śvētāmbara, likely began around the 1st century CE and was solidified by the 5th century CE, primarily over differences in ascetic practices (nudity) and scriptural authority.
From the 12th century onwards, Jainism faced challenges due to the rise of competing devotional movements like Lingayatism and persecution during Mughal Empire, leading to the destruction of some temples. However, the community showed resilience, adapting as mercantile classes and influencing rulers like Emperor Akbar, who, advised by the Śvetāmbara monk Hiravijaya, temporarily banned animal slaughter during Paryushana. The Modern Period saw interactions with colonial rule, academic recognition spurred by scholars like Hermann Jacobi, monastic revivals led by figures such as Acharya Shantisagar, and the emergence of reform movements.
Foundations: The Independent Tradition (Pre-History – 5th c. BCE)
The Atharvaveda (Book 15) describes a distinct group of ascetics known as the Vratyas, who existed on the fringes of Vedic society in the Magadha region.[6][7][8] Unlike the Vedic priests, the Vratyas did not perform fire sacrifices (agnihotra) and traveled in groups.[8] Scholars like Ramaprasad Chanda and D.R. Bhandarkar have identified the Vratyas as the proto-Jain or indigenous Śramaṇa lineage that predates Mahavira, the 24th tirthankara.[6][7][8] The Vratyas are described as standing still for long periods in a posture resembling the Jain Kayotsarga (standing meditation), and their leader is referred to as the Ekavratya or Arhant, terms later central to Jain theology.[6][7] Indologist J.C. Heesterman suggests that the Vratya tradition represents the 'pre-classical' roots of the renouncer movements, providing the cultural bridge between the earlier Indus Valley civilization and the later historical Jain sangha.[9]
Proto-History and Universal Lineage
Triangular prism sealing from Indus Valley Civilisation, depicting a male cult figure seated in a yogic posture on a throne, a bull-like animal, and five characters in the Indus script. From Mohenjo-daro, Mature Harrapean period, c. 2600-1900 BC. Ashmolean Museum.
Jain tradition posits a lineage of 24 tirthankaras who guide humanity across cosmic time cycles.[11] While scholarly consensus traces verifiable historical roots to the 9th–8th century BCE,[12][13] the narratives of the earlier tirthankaras contain significant overlaps with Vedic and Epic literature, suggesting deep antiquity.[14]
The 20th tirthankara, Munisuvrata, is traditionally placed as a contemporary of Rama.[28] Jain versions of the epic, such as the Paumacariya]], depict the narrative through a Jain lens, emphasizing non-violence over martial valor.[28]
The 22nd tirthankara, Neminatha, is traditionally linked as a cousin of Krishna, sharing the Yadava lineage of Saurashtra.[29][30][11][31] Some historians connect him with "Ghora Angirasa", a teacher mentioned in the Chandogya Upanishad who taught Krishna the principle of ahimsa, suggesting a historical interaction between the Jain and Vedic traditions.[29][30][11][32]
An 8th-century CE brass idol of Parshvanatha. It depicts the 23rd tirthankara, the earliest Jain leader accepted by scholars as a historical figure (c. 9th–8th century BCE), and illustrates the later artistic tradition associated with him.
Parshvanatha (c. 9th–8th century BCE), the 23rd tirthankara, is the earliest Jain leader widely accepted by scholars as a historical figure.[33][34][35][36] Born in Varanasi,[37] his historicity establishes Jainism as a distinct pre-Buddhist Śramaṇa tradition.[33][34][35][36] Historical analysis suggests his teachings formed the basis for the Chaturyama Dharma (Four-fold Restraint): non-violence, truth, non-stealing, and non-possession.[38][39][40] Traditional accounts place his liberation (moksha) atop Mount Sammeda (now Sammed Shikharji), which remains a site of paramount importance in Jain pilgrimage.[41][42]
While specific events like the legendary obstruction by Kamath during meditation (traditionally associated with Ahichchhatra) are part of hagiography, the sites themselves gained historical significance.[43] Ahichchhatra became a major Jain pilgrimage center with temples commemorating Parshvanatha.[44]
Evidence for the continuity of his monastic order is suggested by Śvetāmbara texts, such as the Upkeśa Gaccha Pattavali (a monastic genealogy), which details a lineage of teachers that descended from him.[45][46][b]
A modern depiction of Mahavira. As a contemporary of the Buddha, Mahavira is a key historical anchor, recognized by scholars as a reformer of the pre-existing Nigantha community.
Mahavira (c. 6th century BCE), the 24th tirthankara, is recognized by scholars as a reformer of the pre-existing community established by Parshvanatha rather than the founder of a new religion.[49][50] Born in Kundagrama near Vaishali, he attained omniscience (Kevala Jnana) after 12 years of asceticism.[21][51][52][53]
As a contemporary of Gautama Buddha, Mahavira's life provides a crucial anchor point for early Indian chronology.[54][35][55][56] Early Buddhist texts frequently refer to him as Nigantha Nataputta ("The Bondless Son of the Nata Clan) and describe his followers, the Niganthas, as a significant, established ascetic community distinct from the Buddhists.[57][58][c] The two communities were prominent competitors for followers and patronage, particularly among the merchant (vaishya) groups.[60][61][62][63] Mahavira also faced rivalry from Makkhali Gosala, the founder of the Ājīvika sect, who is described in Jain texts as an early companion of Mahavira before breaking away to preach fatalism.[64][65][66] According to Svetambara, there were eight schisms (Nihvana) during the time of Mahavira.[67] The primary archaeological evidence for the Ājīvikas is the Barabar Caves in Bihar.[68] These are the oldest rock-cut caves in India, dedicated by Emperor Ashoka in the 3rd century BCE.[69] Their austere design provided a model for later Jain and Buddhist rock-cut monasteries.[70]
At age 30, he renounced worldly life and undertook intense ascetic practices for over 12 years before attaining omniscience (Kevala Jnana).[38][71] For the next 30 years, he traveled extensively through the Ganges basin, teaching the path to liberation.[72] His liberation (moksha) is traditionally held to have occurred at Pawapuri (also in Bihar), an event marking the beginning of the Jain Vira Nirvana Samvat calendar era.[73][74][75] The night of his nirvana are commemorated by Jains as Diwali at the same time that Hindus celebrate it.[75][76]
His chief disciple, Indrabhuti Gautama, is said to have attained omniscience the night that Mahavira achieved nirvana from Pawapuri.[77] Following Mahavira's death, leadership of the Jain community passed to his ganadhara (chief disciple) Sudharmaswami (d. 600 BCE).[78] He is traditionally regarded as the head of the sangha from whom the entire historical monastic lineage is traced.[78] He was succeeded by Jambuswami (d. 463 BCE) who is regarded as the last omniscient being by Jain traditions.[78] Traditional Jain accounts also name early kings of the Haryanka dynasty, such as Bimbisara, Ajatashatru and Udayin, as patrons, though external historical verification for this varies.[79]
The Formative Age: Migration & Epigraphy (4th c. BCE – 1st c. CE)
The history of Jainism after Mahavira is defined by its geographic dispersion from the Gangetic plains to the South and West, a process evidenced by a combination of royal legends, early epigraphy, and archaeological discoveries.
Archaeological Origins: The Lohanipur Torso & Barli
The earliest potential Jain monumental sculpture is the Lohanipur Torso, a highly polished, naked male torso discovered near Patna, Bihar.[80][81] Its distinctive polish dates it to the Mauryan era (c. 3rd c. BCE).[80][82][83] The statue's nudity and stiff Kayotsarga meditation pose are cited by Digambara scholars as early evidence of the Mula Sangh (original naked order) existing in Magadha before any schism.[80][84][83][81] Epigraphic evidence also appears early in Rajasthan.[85] The Barli Inscription, discovered in 1912 and dated to the 2nd or 1st century BCE, is interpreted by some scholars as a Jain dedication, marking the religion's early spread into western India.[86][85][87]
The Great Migration (The Sectarian Divide)
A pivotal, albeit debated, event in Jain history is the Great Migration to the South.[88][89][90] According to Digambara tradition, the monk Bhadrabahu (d. 298 BCE) predicted a 12-year famine in Magadha.[88][91] To preserve the strict rules of the Jina Kalpa (which included nudity and specific eating rituals), he led a group of 12,000 monks south to Shravanabelagola (Karnataka).[88][89][90] Tradition holds that Chandragupta Maurya (c. 322–298 BCE), the founder of the Mauryan Empire, abdicated his throne, joined Bhadrabahu as a monk, and ended his life through Sallekhana (ritual fasting to death) on Chandragiri Hill.[88][89][90] Later inscriptions at Shravanabelagola (dating from 600 CE onwards) strongly commemorate this event as the foundation of the southern Jain community.[92] The monks who stayed behind in Magadha during the famine were forced to relax their vows (such as wearing white cloth) to survive, leading to the Śvetāmbara deviation.[93]
Śvetāmbara reject the specific Bhadrabahu-Chandragupta migration narrative as inauthentic or a later fabrication.[94][95] They maintain that the schism was a gradual process caused by doctrinal differences later in the timeline.[96] Some scholars[which?] specifically state that the said lore was developed after 600 CE and is inauthentic.[97]
The edicts of Chandragupta's grandson, Ashoka (c. 273–232 BCE), mention the Niganthas (Jains) when detailing the duties of his law-authorities (dhammamahatma), confirming they were a well-established community.[98] Ashoka's grandson, Samprati (c. 224–215 BCE), is described in Śvetāmbara canonical scriptures as a major patron, or "Jain Ashoka," who was converted by the monk Suhastin and built thousands of Jain temples from his capital in Ujjain.[99][100][101][102]
Western Interactions: The Gymnosophists
The Gymnosophists Greek accounts from the campaign of Alexander the Great (326 BCE) provide the earliest Western descriptions of Jain ascetics, whom they termed Gymnosophists ("Naked Philosophers").[103][104] The Greeks encountered a group of these ascetics in Taxila led by a sage named Dandamis (or Mandanis).[103] While Dandamis famously refused to meet Alexander, asserting his spiritual independence from any temporal conqueror, his disciple Kalanos agreed to accompany the Macedonian army to Persia.[103] While some scholars debate their sectarian identity, their strict adherence to nudity and public penance align with the Digambara monastic code.[103] Kalanos later taught Alexander the philosophy of detachment before voluntarily ending his life by immolation at Susa, an event that deeply impacted Greek Stoic philosophy.[105][106]
Royal Patronage in the East: King Kharavela and Hathigumpha Inscription
Entrance of the Hathigumpha monument. The pillared front, steps and other structures were added in 19th and 20th centuries to help conserve the monument.
The most definitive epigraphic evidence of early royal patronage comes from the Hathigumpha inscription at Udayagiri and Khandagiri Caves in Odisha.[107][108][109] Dated to the 2nd or 1st century BCE, it details the reign of Emperor Kharavela of the Mahameghavahana dynasty.[108][109] The inscription notably begins with a variation of the Navkar Mantra and records Kharavela recovering a "Kalinga Jina" idol that had been taken by the Nanda dynasty, suggesting Jainism was established in Kalinga as early as the 4th century BCE.[107][108][109] The site contains extensive rock-cut monasteries (gumphas) including the two-storied Ranigumpha (Queen's Cave), proving that Jainism flourished under state patronage outside the Mauryan sphere.[108][109]
An ayagapata (tablet of homage) depicting Parshvanatha, c. 15 CE, found at Kankali Tila, Mathura. Such tablets, often featuring tirthankaras or stupas, were common votive offerings during the Kushan period.A Kushan-era sculpture (c. 51 CE) from Kankali Tila depicting the last four tirthankaras. The detailed iconography and dated inscriptions found at Mathura demonstrate the standardization and flourishing of Jain art under the Kushanas.A 1st- to 2nd–century CE water tank relief panel showing two ardhaphalaka Jain monks carrying colapatta cloth on their left hand found in the ruins of Mathura (Brooklyn Museum 87.188.5). This cloth carrying tradition to cover genitalia by ancient Jain monks in principle resembles the beliefs of the Śvetāmbara.
The most extensive archaeological evidence for early Jainism comes from Kankali Tila in Mathura (Uttar Pradesh).[112] Excavations here have revealed a thriving community from the 2nd century BCE to the Kushan period (c. 1st–3rd c. CE).[113]
Unlike modern Jainism, early devotees at Mathura built Stupas (relic mounds) and worshipped Ayagapatas (votive tablets).[112] Tablets like the Parsvanatha Ayagapata (c. 15 CE) show the transition from symbol worship to image worship.[114][115] The vast majority of tirthankara images found at Mathura are nude, which Digambaras cite as archaeological proof that the original Jain tradition was "sky-clad" (Digambara).[116][117][115]
However, some relief panels also depict monks holding a small piece of cloth (ardhaphalaka) to cover their privates.[118] Scholars often interpret the ardhaphalaka monks as a "proto-Śvetāmbara" stage or a transitional sect.[119]Digambara tradition views them either as Kshullakas (junior monks who wear two cloths) or as members of the Yapaniya sect, a now-extinct group that practiced nudity but held Śvetāmbara-like doctrinal views.[120][110][111]
The Philosophical Crystallization (2nd c. CE – 8th c. CE)
Following the formative period, Jainism entered a "Golden Age" of intellectual development. This period saw the hardening of the Digambara-Śvetāmbara schism through the codification of scripture and the rise of Jain logic.
Jain tradition, particularly the Kalakacharya Katha (legends likely compiled 4th-10th c. CE), describes interactions with Saka (Indo-Scythian) rulers.[127][128][d] Archaeological confirmation comes from the Bava Pyara caves and Talaja Caves in Gujarat (c. 1st–4th c. CE), which show clear evidence of Jain occupation during the Saka-Kshatrapa period.[130][131] King Salivahana (late 1st century CE), associated with conflicts against the Sakas, is also mentioned in Jain legends as a patron, though this is historically uncertain.[129]
This era produced the "Great Acharyas" whose works defined Jain metaphysics and logic.
Samantabhadra is said to have lived from 150 CE to 250 CE. He was from southern India during the time of Cholas. He was a poet, logician, eulogist and an accomplished linguist.[136] He is credited with spreading Jainism in southern India.[137]Umaswati was an Indian scholar, possibly between the 2nd and 5th centuries CE, known for his foundational writings on Jainism.[138][139] He authored the Jain textTattvartha Sutra (literally '"All That Is", also called Tattvarthadhigama Sutra).[140]
Jainism maintained a significant presence and received patronage during the Gupta Empire (c. 4th-6th c. CE).[141] This is attested by epigraphy, such as a 425 CE inscription from the Udayagiri Caves in Madhya Pradesh (distinct from the Odisha site), which records the installation of a Parshvanatha statue during Kumaragupta I's reign.[141]
This period also saw the beginning of major structural temple complexes; the earliest temples at the important Deogarh site (Uttar Pradesh) date from the 6th century.[142] Beyond monumental art, this era demonstrates a sophisticated tradition of Jain metal-casting.[citation needed] The Chausa hoard (Bihar, c. 1st-3rd c. CE) is considered the earliest-known group of Jain bronzes.[143][144] This tradition flourished into the Gupta period, as evidenced by major finds like the Akota Hoard (Gujarat, 5th c.), which contained a large cache of high-quality tirthankara images.[145] In Western India, early rock-cut activity from this period is evident at the Dhank Caves in Gujarat (c. 4th-7th c. CE), which contain early tirthankara sculptures.[146]
The division of Jainism into its two main sects, the Digambara ("sky-clad") and the Śvetāmbara ("white-clad"), was a gradual process of divergence in monastic practice and doctrine.[94] While traditional narratives place the split as early as the 4th century BCE, modern scholarly consensus, based on archaeological and literary evidence, suggests the divergence began around the 1st century CE and was finalized in the 3rd to 5th centuries CE.[147][148]
Archaeological and Literary Formalization
The scholarly understanding of the schism is based on the parallel timing of the formalization of each sect's distinct art and literature, which all appear to date from the Gupta and post-Gupta periods.[citation needed]
Early Archaeological Evidence (c. 1st–3rd CE): The extensive finds at Kankali Tila in Mathura are central to the historical debate.[citation needed] The vast majority of tirthankara mūrtis (idols) from this pre-Gupta period are depicted nude.[94] The Digambara tradition cites this as primary evidence for the antiquity and orthodoxy of its mūla patha (original path).[citation needed] Alongside these idols, relief panels also depict ascetics wearing a single piece of cloth (ardhaphalaka).[94] Scholars interpret this as evidence of a pre-sectarian period where multiple monastic traditions (including those that were forerunners to the Śvetāmbara) co-existed, while the Digambara tradition interprets the robed figures as junior monks (Kshullaka).[149]
Later Art & Iconography (c. 5th–6th CE): The earliest definitive clothed tirthankara idols appear significantly later.[94] The Akota Hoard, a collection of Jain bronzes from Gujarat dated to the 5th-7th centuries, contains images of tirthankaras depicted wearing a dhoti. This marks a clear, formalized break from the earlier Mathura artistic standard and is seen by historians as the beginning of a distinct Śvetāmbara iconographic tradition.[citation needed]
Parallel Literary Formalization (c. 3rd–5th CE): This same period saw both traditions solidify their distinct scriptural and philosophical canons.[150][151]
Digambara: This tradition holds that the original agamas were lost.[150][154][155] Its foundational scripture is the Shatkhandagama, believed to be based on the oral tradition of the 1st/2nd-century monk Dharasena.[156] According to tradition, alarmed at dwindling scriptural knowledge, he summoned two monks, Puşpadanta and Bhūtabali, to his cave in Girnar and transmitted the last of his knowledge to them, which they composed in sutra form.[157][158] In the subsequent period, the sect's foundational philosophy was written by its great Acharyas.[150] While Kundakunda is traditionally dated earlier, many scholars, such as Paul Dundas, place him in the mid-8th-century.[159][160] Natubhai Shah and Jayandra Soni places him in either the 2nd– or 3rd–century CE.[136][161] His works, particularly the Samayasara, provided the profound metaphysical foundation for the Digambara identity, cementing the intellectual basis for the split.[159] Other foundational Digambara scholars like Pujyapada are also dated by historians to the 5th-6th centuries.[162][163] Notably, Umaswati's Tattvartha Sutra (c. 2nd-5th century) is the first Jain text in Sanskrit and is accepted as an authoritative text by all Jain traditions, including Digambaras.[164][165]
This convergence of evidence—the first distinct Śvetāmbara art (Akota) and the foundational Digambara philosophy (Kundakunda)—both appearing in the 3rd-6th century CE, along with the Śvetāmbara canon's codification (Vallabhi), leads most historians to identify this as the period of the schism's definitive formation.[166]
Traditional Narratives
The traditional narratives, while not considered the historical cause by most modern scholars, are foundational to each sect's identity and explain their interpretation of the split.[167]
Digambara Narrative: Recorded in later hagiographies around 10th century CE,[168] this account places the split in the 4th century BCE.[169] It states that Acharya Bhadrabahu predicted a famine in Magadha and led a migration of monks to the South.[169][170][168] The monks who remained, led by Sthulabhadra, adopted the "heretical" practice of wearing robes.[169][170][168] The monks who returned from the south, having preserved the original practice of nudity, became the Digambaras.[169][170][168]
Śvetāmbara Narrative: Recorded in earlier texts like the 5th-century Avashyak Bhashya, this account claims the sangha was unified until 82 CE.[171][168] It states a monk named Sivabhuti, in an act of pride, rejected his robes and began teaching the "false doctrine" of obligatory nudity, thereby founding the Digambara line.[67][171][172][173]
Summary of Core Doctrinal Differences
The split was formalized over five key disagreements:[citation needed]
Nudity: Digambaras hold that total nudity is an essential prerequisite for a monk to attain moksha.[174][175]Śvetāmbara monks wear simple, unstitched white robes.[175]
Liberation of Women: Digambaras believe a woman cannot attain moksha in a female body and must be reborn as a man.[174][67]Śvetāmbara believe women are fully capable of attaining moksha and that the 19th tirthankara, Mallinatha, was female.[176][175]
Life of a Kevalin: Digambaras hold that an omniscient being transcends all bodily needs and no longer eats or drinks.[174][67]Śvetāmbara believe a Kevalin continues to eat, drink, and teach until their final nirvana.[174][175]
Scripture: As noted above, Śvetāmbaras accept the canon codified at Vallabhi, while Digambaras hold that the original agamas were lost and rely on later Acharya-composed texts.[150][154]
Iconography: Digambara mūrtis are unadorned with downcast eyes.[citation needed]Śvetāmbara mūrtis are depicted with open, "living" eyes and are ritually adorned with clothes and jewels during puja.[citation needed]
A text on differences between Digambara and Svetambara sects of Jainism was composed by Hemraj Pande in 1652 named Chaurasi Bol.[177]
The Third Sect: The Yapaniyas
Beyond the Digambara and Śvetāmbara divide, a third major sect known as the Yapaniya flourished in the Deccan from the 5th to the 14th century CE.[178] Epigraphic evidence, particularly from the Kadamba and Rashtrakuta periods, indicates that the Yapaniyas were a dominant monastic order in Karnataka, often receiving royal patronage alongside the Digambaras.[178]
The Yapaniyas occupied a middle ground in the schism: their monks practiced nudity (like the Digambaras) but they accepted the authority of the Śvetāmbara scriptures and—crucially—believed that women could attain liberation (moksha).[179] Scholar Padmanabh S. Jaini notes that the Yapaniyas were instrumental in spreading Jainism in the south and may have been responsible for the eventual 'softening' of Digambara orthodoxy regarding temple worship and the status of women.[180] They eventually merged into the Digambara tradition, leaving a legacy visible in the specific rituals of Karnataka's Jain temples today.[180]
Classical Age: Patronage and Pan-India Extent (c. 7th – 13th c. CE)
The Classical Age saw Jainism reach a zenith of influence and artistic production, particularly in the Deccan, under the patronage of major dynasties.[citation needed]
The Mercantile Engine: Guilds and Temple Economy
The rapid expansion of Jainism during the Classical Age was driven by a symbiotic relationship between the monastic community (Sangha) and powerful merchant guilds (Srenis).[181] In Western and Southern India, Jain merchants came to dominate trans-regional trade networks, such as the Vira Banaju and Nanadesi guilds.[181] Epigraphic evidence reveals that these guilds frequently levied voluntary taxes (cess) on goods—such as betel leaves, textiles, and precious stones—specifically to fund temple construction and monastic libraries (Bhandaras).[181]
This economic power translated into political influence.[182] Notable 'Merchant-Princes' like Vastupala and Tejapala (ministers to the Vaghela kings) and Jagadu Shah (a 13th-century shipping magnate) utilized their immense personal wealth to finance state defenses and public works, effectively establishing Jainism as a state-protected religion without needing a Jain monarch on the throne.[182] Historian Kanakalatha Mukund notes that this 'Temple Economy' allowed Jain institutions to function as quasi-banks, lending money for agricultural expansion and stabilizing the economy during feudal conflicts.[182]
Patronage in the Deccan (Chalukyas, Rashtrakutas, Gangas)
Kadambas: The Kadamba dynasty (c. 4th-6th c.) provided crucial early patronage in Karnataka, with numerous inscriptions at sites like Halasi confirming royal grants for temples and monks, including those of the Yapaniya sect.[183][184]
Rashtrakutas: This dynasty (c. 8th-10th c.) presided over a golden age for Deccan Jainism.[191][192] Many rulers were inclined towards Jainism, supporting scholars like Virasena and Jinasena (authors of the Dhavala and Adipurana respectively) and mathematicians like Mahaviracharya.[193] King Amoghavarsha I was particularly noted for his Jain leanings.[194]Kumudendu Muni, in his writing Siribhoovalaya, claims to be the spirititual teacher of Amoghavarsha and Shivamara II.[194][195] This patronage culminated architecturally in the excavation of the elaborate Jain caves (Caves 30-34) at the UNESCO site of Ellora, including the famous Indra Sabha.[196][197] This pattern of adding new Jain excavations to older religious sites is also seen at the Nasik Caves, where new Jain caves were excavated under Rashtrakuta patronage in the 9th century.[198] The Dharashiv Caves in Maharashtra also belong to this period of Rashtrakuta influence.[199][200]
Hoysalas: The early Hoysala rulers (11th-12th c.) were also significant patrons before Vishnuvardhana's conversion to Vaishnavism.[204][205] He, as Bitti Deva, and his general Gangaraja supported Jain centers like Shravanabelagola.[206][207][204]
Jain monastic and artistic activity continued at other sites, such as the Mangi-Tungi caves, which feature a large collection of medieval (c. 12th c.) rock-cut tirthankara sculptures.[208] Jain monasticism also utilized large natural cave systems, as evidenced by the Belum Caves in Andhra Pradesh, where archaeological finds confirm a long period of occupation.[209] In the Andhra region, sites like the Undavalli Caves show a complex history, with scholars suggesting an early Jain or Buddhist foundation (c. 4th-5th c. CE) before their later conversion to Hindu use.[210]
Following the decline of the Gupta empire, the Maitraka dynasty of Valabhi (c. 475–776 CE) emerged as a pivotal patron of the Jain faith in Gujarat.[118] It was under their reign, specifically during the tenure of Dhruvasena I, that the Second Jain Council was held at Valabhi (c. 453 or 466 CE).[118] Presided over by Devardhigani Kshamashramana, this council resulted in the final redaction and writing down of the Śvetāmbara canon (Agamas) to prevent the loss of oral knowledge.[118]
During the subsequent Gurjara-Pratihara period (c. 8th–11th century CE), Jainism became deeply embedded in the mercantile ethos of Rajasthan.[214] Towns such as Osian became major centers, with the famous Mahavira Temple (built by the Pratihara king Vatsaraja in 783 CE) serving as the cradle of the Oswal merchant community.[214] Archaeological evidence from this era, including the Vasantgarh Hoard (687 CE) and the Hansi Hoard, demonstrates that Jain merchant guilds possessed significant wealth and political influence in the Pratihara feudal structure long before the rise of the Chaulukya dynasty (c. 950–1300 CE).[215]
Jainism entered a period of significant prosperity in Western India, particularly in Gujarat and Rajasthan, under the Chaulukya dynasty.[citation needed] While the monarchs were often Shaivite, many of their ministers and powerful merchants were devout Jains.[citation needed] This patronage funded a period of extensive artistic and architectural development, characterized by temple complexes noted for their intricate carving.[citation needed]
Palitana Temples (Shatrunjaya Hill): This period saw the expansion of Palitana into a major temple complex, or "city of temples," on Shatrunjaya Hill.[217] Its development as a major pilgrimage (tirtha) site was solidified under Chaulukya rule.[217]
Girnar: Jain temples were built at Girnar in the 13th century, solidifying its ancient status as a tirtha, which had been noted by the 7th-century Chinese traveler Xuanzang.[218]
Other dynasties in the region also supported Jainism.[219][220] The Shilahara dynasty (c. 8th–13th c.), which ruled parts of Maharashtra and the Konkan coast, were patrons of Jainism, funding temples in the region.[219][220]
This architectural development was accompanied by other forms of material culture.[221] The Akota and Vasantgarh bronze hoards, with images dating from the 5th to 11th centuries, demonstrate a continuous tradition of metal casting.[221] Furthermore, the shastra bhandars (libraries) of Gujarat from this period preserved the earliest surviving examples of illuminated Jain palm-leaf manuscripts, which are a primary source for the Shvetambara textual and artistic tradition.[citation needed]
Influence in Central India
Jainism maintained a significant presence in Central India, often under the patronage of local dynasties.[citation needed] This influence is demonstrated through major architectural projects and portable art:[citation needed]
Khajuraho: The Jain temples at Khajuraho, including the Parshvanatha, Adinatha, and Shantinatha temples, were constructed in the 10th and 11th centuries by the Chandela rulers.[222][223] They are a prominent part of the UNESCO World Heritage site and show a distinct architectural style shared with the Hindu temples at the site.[222][223]
Deogarh: The Jain temple complex at Deogarh, first established during the Gupta period, saw continuous construction through the 13th century, with dozens of temples and "Sahastrakuta" (thousand-Jina) pillars being erected, making it a vital center of Jain art.[224]
Bawangaja: The 12th-century monolithic statue of Rishabhanatha at Bawangaja, standing at 84 ft (26 m), is one of the tallest Jain statues in the world, attesting to the faith's prominence in the Satpura range.[225][226][227][228]
Evidence for a widespread Jain community is also found in material culture, such as the Hansi hoard (Haryana, c. 8th-9th c. CE), which contained numerous Jain bronze images.[229]
Influence in Eastern India
Jainism maintained a significant presence in Eastern India, often under the patronage of local dynasties.[citation needed]
Shikharji mountain where Jain tradition places nirvana of 20 out of 24 tirthankaras
Shikharji: The site of Shikharji in modern Jharkhand, revered as the place of nirvana for 20 tirthankaras, saw significant architectural development.[230] The Jain temple housing 20 tirthankara idols was constructed by Vastupala, the same minister who built at Dilwara, demonstrating the pan-Indian nature of Jain patronage.[230][231]
In Odisha, Jainism continued to flourish after the Kharavela era, particularly under the Murunda dynasty and later local rulers.[232] Archaeological evidence includes the later medieval caves at Khandagiri (Cuttack district) and the Jain temple complexes at Subai (Koraput district).[232]
Medieval Decline & Resilience (c. 14th – 17th c.)
Jainism co-existed with Buddhism and Hinduism in ancient and medieval India. Many of its historic temples were built near Buddhist and Hindu temples in the 1st millennium CE.[233] The Jain and Hindu communities have often been very close and mutually accepting. Some Hindu temples have included a Jain Tirthankara within its premises in a place of honour.[234][235] Similarly numerous temple complexes feature both Hindu and Jain monuments, with Badami cave temples and Khajuraho among some of the most well known.[236][237]
Medieval Developments: Tantrism and Ritual Complexity
Between the 6th and 12th centuries, Jainism underwent a 'Tantric Turn' to compete with the rising popularity of Shaiva and Buddhist esoteric traditions.[238] While retaining the core vegetarian ethos, Jain monks incorporated Mantra-vada (the path of spells) and Yantra rituals into the faith.[238]
This period saw the elevation of Sasanadevis (Guardian Goddesses) such as Padmavati, Ambika, and Jwalamalini.[239] Texts like the 'Bhairava-Padmavati-Kalpa' (c. 11th century) codified rituals for worldly goals—curing disease, protection from snakes, and the subduing of political rivals.[239] Historian Paul Dundas notes that this 'Tantricization' provided a necessary spiritual safety valve, allowing the lay community to seek worldly protection within the Jain fold rather than converting to other faiths.[240]
Institutional Survival: The Bhattaraka Tradition
During the medieval period, particularly from the 14th century onwards, the Digambara tradition developed a specialized clerical class known as the Bhattarakas.[241] Unlike the traditional naked monks (Munis) who were bound by strict vows of homelessness and non-possession, Bhattarakas were pontiffs who wore orange robes, resided in permanent monasteries (Mathas), and managed the community's temporal assets.[241]
The Bhattarakas served as the 'Institutional Shield' for the community during the Delhi Sultanate and Mughal eras.[242] Because naked ascetics could not legally sign treaties or hold land titles, the Bhattarakas acted as the legal heads of the religion, negotiating with rulers to protect temples and managing the vast Jain Bhandaras (libraries).[242] The seats of the Bhattarakas, such as at Shravanabelagola, Moodabidri, and Delhi, became centers of literary preservation, ensuring the survival of ancient texts like the Shatkhandagama and the Dhavala commentaries.[242]
Competition and Persecution
Jainism faced persecution during Lingayat movements in Telugu and Kannada speaking territories like Wodeyar of Mysore and Ummatur (1399–1610), Nayaks of Keladi (1550–1763).[243] In 1683, they stamped the lingam symbol in the main temple complex of Jains in Halebidu. Digambaras were forced to perform Shaiva rites.[244] According to von Glasenapp writing in the 1920s, it is said Hoysala king Vishnuvardhana (c. 1108–1152 CE) converted from Jainism and became a follower of Ramanuja.[245] According to more contemporary scholars such as T. K. Tukol, the rule of Bitti Deva did not persecute or force convert Jains. He converted, but his queen Shantaladevi remained a Jain. She was a patron of art and built Jain temples.[246] Bittideva's general and prime minister Gangaraja, states Tukol, was a Jain who under the guidance of his Guru Subhachandra did many acts of piety and religion to advance the cause of Jainism.[246] Bittideva employed a female general who was a Jain lady named Jakkiyabbe. His era saw temples being installed for all 24 Tirthankaras.[246] The Vijayanagara Empire king Bukka Raya I, states von Glasenapp, ensured that both Vaishnava and Jaina traditions enjoyed same cultural and religious freedoms, and helped repair Jain temples.[245]Anandatirtha, a Hindu thinker, preached a dualistic theology, which attracted many Jains to convert to Hinduism.[245]
According to British era scholar von Glasenapp, during the 11th century, Basava, a minister to the Digambara Jain king Bijjala II, converted numerous Jains to Lingayatism who was hostile to Digambaras. According to legend, they destroyed various temples belonging to Jains and adapted them to their use.[249] A saint named Ekdanta Ramaya further propagated the loosely existing Lingayatism. He convinced Bijjala II to grant a land near Abdlur for a temple of Shiva.[243]
According to Paul Dundas, in and after the 12th century, Muslim destruction caused Jain scholars to revisit their theory of Ahimsa (non-violence). For example, Jinadatta Suri in the 12th century, wrote during a time of widespread destruction of Jain temples and blocking of Jaina pilgrimage by Muslim armies, that "anybody engaged in a religious activity who was forced to fight and kill somebody" in self-defense would not lose merit.[250]
According to Jain texts, some of the Hindu gods are blood relatives of legendary tirthankara. Neminatha, the 22nd tirthankara for example is a cousin of Krishna in Jain Puranas and other texts.[251] However, Jain scholars such as Haribhadra also wrote satires about Hindu gods, mocking them with novel outrageous stories where the gods misbehave and act unethically.[252][253] The Hindu gods are recorded by some Jain writers as persecuting, tempting, afraid of, or serving a legendary Jina before he gains omniscience. In other stories, the Hindu deities such as Vishnu, or Rama and Sita come to pay respect to a Jina at a major Jain pilgrimage site such as Mount Satrunjaya and Mount Sammed Shikhar Ji.[254] The languid Hindu scholars rewrote the original pre historic stories into their Hindu versions. According to Paul Dundas, these satires were aimed at the Hindu lay householder community, were means to inculcate piety and subvert the actual religious teachings offered by their Jain neighbors.[252] True to their origins, Buddhist and Hindu scholars engaged in creating similar satire, mythology and parody-filled fiction targeting the Jains and each other.[255] The emergence of major philosophical ideas within Hinduism impacted Jainism. According to a 1925 publication by von Glasenapp, around the 8th century CE, Adi Shankara brought forward the doctrine of Advaita, and either converted Jain temples to Hindu ones or completely destroyed them.[256] The traditions of Vaishnavism and Shaivism also began to emerge. This, states von Glasenapp, contributed to a decline of "Jaina church", particularly in South India.[257]
The Siddhachal Caves and Gopachal rock-cut Jain monuments are a part of nearly 100 Jain monuments found in and around the Gwalior Fort, all dated to be from the 14th to 15th centuries.[citation needed] The inscriptions found near the monuments credit them to the Tomar kings, and they range from the 1440 to 1453 CE. The Siddhachal Caves were complete by about 1473 CE.[citation needed] The Siddhanchal colossi were defaced and desecrated around 1527 when the Babur of Mughal dynasty ordered their destruction.[258][259][260]
After the 12th century, the temples, pilgrimage and Digambara tradition of Jainism suffered persecution during the Muslim rule, with the exception of Akbar whose respect for Hiravijaya and support for Jainism led to a temporary ban on animal killing during the Jain religious festival of Paryushana.[261]Akbar (1542–1605), influenced by the Śvetāmbara monk Hiravijaya, ordered the release of caged birds and banned the killing of animals during the Jain festival of Paryushana.[262] After Akbar, Jains faced an intense period of Muslim persecution in the 17th century.[263] Jain scholars of the Mughal era debated religious ideas with Muslim scholars.[264] Hiravijaya asserts that the two religions are different, Islam involves violence, while Jainism is based on compassion.[264] Jain scholars were supportive of Akbar and Jain texts praise his religious tolerance.[264]
Ranakpur Jain Temple: Built in the 15th century, this temple reflects a continuation of the Western Indian style.[citation needed] It has a complex Chaumukha (four-faced) plan and is known for its hall of 1,444 carved pillars; a local tradition states that no two are identical.[citation needed]
Bhamashah (28 June 1547 – 1600) was a noted general, minister, and close aide of Maharana Pratap.[265] The financial support provided by him helped Maharana Pratap to restore his army and reclaim much of his lost territory.[266]
Diwan Todar Mal was an Oswal Śvetāmbara Jain and Dewan in the court of Mughal Nawab of Sirhind, Wazir Khan.[267][268][45] In Sikh history, he is remembered for buying a small piece of land at a very huge price saying the world's costliest land ever bought for the cremation of the dead bodies of Mata Gujri, the mother and Sahibzada Zorawar Singh and Baba Fateh Singh, the two younger sons of 10th Sikh Guru, Guru Gobind Singh in 1704 A.D, by paying an exorbitant price to the Wazir Khan 'Governor Of Sirhind'. He had to cover the whole piece of land with gold coins (ashrafis) in a vertical position, as he was asked to vertically place gold coins on the land and only that much land was given to him which he could cover with gold coins. He later also made arrangements for their cremation.[269] But, according to Harjinder Singh Dilgeer, the bodies of all the three were cremated by the descendants of Todar Mall Shahjahani because the latter had already died in 1665–66.[270] Todar Mal, however had to bear the brunt of Wazir Khan's wrath, and he and his family had to abandon the haveli soon after, and themselves faded into oblivion, with dilapidated building being their only reminder. In the coming years, the haveli fell into rapid disrepair, and collapsed at many place. Though it survived ransacking of Sirhind by Banda Bahadur and during the reign of The Sikh Confederacy, the haveli was left untouched out of respect for Diwan Todar Mal.[271][272]
Modern Period (c. 18th c. – Present)
British era Christian invaders wrote about Jainism, but typically stereotyping it as "a coldly austere religion of pure asceticism, with no 'heart', preoccupied only with not harming microorganisms". The discussion emphasized the ascetic extremes, rather than the values. They criticized the Jain theories on non-violence stating that this value is essentially equal to "doing nothing", because it entails not "hurting" other beings, but does not demand the "positive ethic of helping someone suffering".[273] According to Jeffrey Long, these missionary writings were a distortion of Jain theology because Jainism does teach, value and has a historic record of charity, and compassion is an essential value in Jainism for spiritual development.[273]
Some Christian writers critiqued Jainism for its cosmology, with extraordinary time scales and cyclic time periods. However, Long states, the genesis theories in Christianity and other religions suffer from equivalent issues and they present the world to have been created few thousand years ago, in a short period of time.[274] Similarly, historic Christian writers critiqued the lack of "saving grace" in Jainism. For example, Sinclair Stevenson wrote in 1915 that the "heart of Jainism was empty because it lacked the saving grace of Jesus".[275]
In the 18th century, the political power of the Jain merchant class peaked with the House of Jagat Seth (Marwari-Oswal bankers) in Bengal.[276] The title Jagat Seth ('Banker of the World') was conferred by the Mughal Emperor, signifying their dominance over the imperial treasury.[276] Historian William Dalrymple notes that this Jain family controlled the minting of coins and held capital reserves that exceeded those of the Bank of England at the time.[276]
The British colonial rule era, according to von Glasenapp in 1925, allowed Jains to pursue their religion without persecutions they had faced before.[278] Further, the British government promoted trade, which allowed members of the Jain community to pursue their traditional economic activity. According to von Glasenapp, Jain businessmen and Jainism thrived during this period, and they used their financial success during the British Raj to rebuild Jain temples. For example, the Dharmanatha temple was built in Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in 1848.[278] The British census reported a drop in Jain population between 1891 and 1921, from 1.417 million to 1.179 million. This may be from the Jain conversions to Hinduism and causes such as famines and epidemics.[278][279][280]
M. Whitney Kelting in 2001 states, in contrast, that in Gujarat and Maharashtra, British merchants actually took over the trades that Jains traditionally engaged in. This was in part responsible for major Jain community migrations during the British colonial era.[279]
The British colonial government in India, as well as Indian princely states, passed laws that made monks roaming naked in streets a crime, one that led to arrest. This law particularly impacted the Digambara tradition monks.[281] The Akhil Bharatiya Digambara Jaina Samaj opposed this law, and argued that it interfered with the religious rights of Digambaras. Digambara monk Shantisagar entered Bombay (now Mumbai) in 1927, but was forced to cover his body. He then led an India-wide tour as the naked monk with his followers, to various Digambara sacred sites, and he was welcomed by kings of the Maharashtra provinces.[281] Shantisagar fasted to oppose the restrictions imposed on Digambara monks by British Raj and demanded their discontinuance.[282] The colonial-era laws that banned naked monks were abolished only after India gained independence.[283]
Shrimad Rajchandra was inspired by works of Kundakunda and Digambara mystical tradition. Nominally belonging to the Digambara tradition, his followers sometimes consider his teaching as a new path of Jainism, neither Śvetāmbara nor Digambara, and revere him as a saint.[284] His path is sometimes referred as Raj Bhakta Marg, Kavipanth, or Shrimadiya, which has mostly lay followers as was Rajchandra himself.[285] His teachings influenced Kanji Swami, Dada Bhagwan,[286]Rakesh Jhaveri, Saubhagbhai, Lalluji Maharaj (Laghuraj Swami), Atmanandji and several other religious figures. Some of them established temples and institutions in his dedication and to spread his teachings. Such temples often house his pictures and images based on photographs taken in a studio in various meditation postures just a month before his death.[287] Shrimad Rajchandra's teachings have been popular in the Jain diaspora communities; mostly in East Africa, the United Kingdom and North America.[citation needed] Bauer notes that "[in] recent years there has been a convergence of the Kanji Swami Panth and the Shrimad Rajcandra movement, part of trend toward a more eucumenical and less sectarian Jainism among educated, mobile Jains living overseas."[288] A special cover featuring him and Rabindranath Tagore was published by the India Post on occasion of Gandhi Jayanti in 2002.[289]
KshullakGaneshprasad Varni (1874–1961) was a foundational figure of the modern Digambara intellectual revival.[291] He established several institutions for advanced learning, most notably the Syadvad Mahavidyalaya at Varanasi in 1905, which reintroduced traditional Jain logic and philosophy into the modern university curriculum.[291] His efforts, along with those of other reformers, were instrumental in standardizing Jain education in the post-independence era.[292]
↑For example: ऋषभं मा समानानां सपत्नानां विषासहिम् । हन्तारं शत्रूणां कृधि विराजं गोपतिं गवाम् ॥१॥ – Rigveda 10.166.1[26] Other examples of Rishabha appearing in the Vedic literature include verses 6.16.47 of Rigveda, 9.4.14-15 of Atharvaveda, 3.7.5.13 and 4.7.10.1 of Taittiriya Brahmana, etc.[27]
↑After Parshvanatha attained liberation, his disciple Arya Subhadatta became the head of the monks. Arya Subhadatta was succeeded by Arya Haridatta, Arya Samudradatta, Kesi, Swayamprabhasuri, and Ratnaprabhasuri and so on.[47] This monastic order was known as Upkeśa Gaccha. Uttaradhyayana, an ancient Svetambara text, has records of a dialogue between Mahavira's disciple Gautama Swami and Kesi; Kesi, along with monks of his monastic order, accepted Mahavira as a tirthankara and merged with his four-fold congregation as a result.[48]
↑The Buddha tried ascetic methods found in Jainism, abandoned that path and taught the Middle Way instead.[59] The Buddha disagreed with the Mahavira's concept of soul or self (jiva). Similarly, he found the Jain theory of karma and rebirths incompatible and inflexible with his own ideas for these.[56]
↑The narrative tells of the Jain monk Kalaka seeking Saka help against King Gardabhilla of Ujjain (c. 1st c. BCE), who had abducted Kalaka's sister, a nun. The Sakas are depicted defeating Gardabhilla and establishing rule, initially revering Kalaka.[129]
↑Salter, Emma (2002) Raj Bhakta Marg: the path of devotion to Srimad Rajcandra. A Jain community in the twenty first century. Doctoral thesis, University of Wales.
Adiga, Malini (2006), The Making of Southern Karnataka: Society, Polity and Culture in the early medieval period, AD 400–1030, Chennai: Orient Longman, ISBN81-250-2912-5
Ali, B. Sheikh (1976), History of the Western Gangas, University of Mysore
Altekar, Anant Sadashiv (1934), The Rashtrakutas And Their Times; being a political, administrative, religious, social, economic and literary history of the Deccan during C. 750 A.D. to C. 1000 A.D, Poona: Oriental Book Agency, OCLC3793499
Bentley, Jerry (1993), Old World Encounters: Cross-Cultural Contacts and Exchanges in Pre-Modern Times, Oxford University Press
Beversluis, Joel Diederik (2000), Sourcebook of the World's Religions: An Interfaith Guide to Religion and Spirituality, Novato, CA: New World Library, ISBN1-57731-121-3
Ekambaranathan, A. (1987), Jaina Inscriptions in Tamilnadu: A Topographical List, Research Foundation for Jainology
Ekambaranathan, A. (2005), Jainism in Tamil Nadu: Art and Archaeology, Jain Humanities Press
Flood, Gavin D. (1996), An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press, ISBN978-0-521-43878-0
Flügel, Peter (2002), Melton, J.G.; Baumann, G. (eds.), Terapanth Svetambara Jain Tradition (Religions of the World: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and Practices), ABC-CLIO, ISBN978-1576072233
Flügel, Peter (2012), "Jainism", in Anheier, Helmut K; Juergensmbneyer, Mark (eds.), Encyclopedia of Global Studies, vol.3, Thousand Oakes: Sage
Helen, Johnson (2009) [1931], Muni Samvegayashvijay Maharaj (ed.), Trisastiśalākāpurusacaritra of Hemacandra: The Jain Saga, vol.Part III, Baroda: Oriental Institute, ISBN978-81-908157-0-3
Jacobi, Hermann (1964), Max Muller (The Sacred Books of the East Series, Volume XXII) (ed.), Jaina Sutras (Translation), Motilal Banarsidass (Original: Oxford University Press)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
