The Sikh Confederacy was a confederation of twelve sovereignSikh states (each known as a Misl, derived from the Arabic word مِثْل meaning 'equal'; sometimes spelt as Misal)[2][3][4][5] which rose during the 18th century in the Punjab region in the northwestern part of the Indian subcontinent.[6]
After the death of Banda Singh, the Sikhs were left without a main leader and entered in a period of hardship.[9] The Sikhs managed to gain control of Amritsar and established it as their centre after evicting the Bandai Sikhs from it.[9] Bhai Mani Singh was appointed as the custodian of the Darbar Sahib shrine.[9] Other opponents to the Sikhs at the time aside from the Mughals were heretical sects, such as the Gulab Rahis and Gangu Shahis, that continued to follow a lineage of personal gurus, which mainstream Sikhs had stopped practicing after the death of Guru Gobind Singh.[9] Whilst the majority of Sikhs in this period continued to live a civilian life in Mughal society, a proporation of Sikhs continued a rebellion against the Mughal authority, with these Sikhs being known as the Tat Khalsa.[9] According to W. H. McLeod, only Sikhs who kept an outwardly Khalsa Sikh identity, such as by keeping uncut hair, were persecuted by the Mughals while the majority of Sikh laymen went mostly unaffected by the Mughal persecutions.[10] These rebel Sikhs took refuge in inaccessible and hidden away areas and conducted a low-level insurgency against the Mughal Empire, such as by plundering and killing government officials and their supporters.[9] One of first the prominent Sikh military actions in the post-Banda Singh Bahadur period was of Tara Singh resisting and being killed by the Mughal forces dispatched by Zakaria Khan after he had chastened the faujdar of Patti.[9] For several years Sikhs found refuge in the forests and the Himalayan foothills until they organized themselves into guerilla bands known as jathas. Ala Singh, establisher of Patiala, had been conquering territory since around 1730.[8]
However, by the early part of the 1730s, the Mughal governor Zakaria Khan changed tactics and attempted to make peace with the Sikh rebels by offering them a robe-of-honour, nawabship, and jagir grant from the Mughal emperor to a selected leader of their choosing.[9] The Sikhs decided to pick Nawab Kapur Singh to receive these gifts from the Mughals, with the jagir consisting of villages near Amritsar.[9] During this short-period of official recognition of the Sikhs by the Mughals, there was a brief moment of peace between the two parties, which allowed the Sikhs to formulate their ranks into more concise categorizations.[9] Nawab Kapur Singh decided to organize the large amount of Sikhs into deras (large units) that were led by various heads from Khatri, Jat, and Rangreta backgrounds, with the duties of the communal kitchens (langar), treasury, stores, arsenal, and granery being assigned to specific Sikhs based upon their seniority and merit.[9]
The basis of the Dal Khalsa army was established in 1733–1735 during the period of Sikh nawabship under the Mughals, based upon the numerous pre-existing Jatha militia groups and had two main formations: the Taruna Dal ("youth brigade") and the Budha Dal ("elder brigade").[11][12] The Sarbat Khalsa had attempted several times to unite the various, scattered jathas of the Sikhs into more defined institutions or bodies to better-able to defend themselves from Mughal and Afghan attacks.[12]
However, Nawab Kapur Singh's attempts to pacify the Sikhs under him during the period of nawabship did not quell the desires of some of the more rebellious, anti-Mughal Sikhs, with some of them resuming their guerilla war tactics against the Mughal government, consisting of plundering and killing.[9] Therefore, Zakaria Khan took-back the jagir that had been granted upon the Sikhs and restarted his anti-Sikh policies from before with increased intensity.[9] Thus, the Sikhs returned to their jatha lifestyle in the face of government oppression.[9] However, Bhai Mani Singh still controlled Amritsar due to paying a stipulated amount to the Mughal administration, which permitted the Sikhs to gather there on Diwali as long as this remittance was paid.[9] After Mani Singh failed to pay the stipulated amount, he was executed by the Mughals.[9] In 1739, the Sikhs pillaged the army of Nader Shah of Persia who was invading India and this led the Persian leader to warn Zakaria Khan that his rule in Punjab was threatened by the Sikhs.[9] By the 1740s, the anti-Sikh persecution by the Mughals was at its highest levels, with faujdars and zamindars carrying-out Sikh oppression, such as the deaths of Mehtab Singh, Sukha Singh, Taru Singh, and Bota Singh.[9] Zakaria Khan was succeeded by Yahya Khan, who continued the anti-Sikh oppression.[9] During Yahya Khan's tenure, a band of Sikhs under Jassa Singh Ahluwalia killed Jaspat Rai, the Mughal faujdar of Eminabad.[9] Jaspat Rai's brother, Lakhpat Rai, who served as the diwan of Lahore, started massacring thousands of Sikhs in-response, which was a genocide known by the Sikhs as the Chotta Ghallughara.[9]
By 1748, the Sikhs had expelled the Mughal faujdar of Amritsar and constructed a fortress known as Ram Rauni there.[9] On the annual meeting of the Sarbat Khalsa in Amritsar in 1748 during either Diwali or Baisakhi, a Gurmata was passed where the Jathas were reorganized into a new grouping called misls, with eleven misls forming out of the various pre-existing Jathas and a unified army known as the Dal Khalsa Ji.[note 1][11][12] However, some of these misls, or at least their names, were used prior to this event in 1748.[12] Some argue that instead of there being eleven misls, there were actually twelve, with the inclusion of the Phulkia Misl.[12] However, strictly speaking, the Phulkia Misl was not a misl in the true sense of the word, as it had been excluded from the Sarbat Khalsa decision of 1748 to create the confederacy.[12] Ultimate command over the Misls was bestowed to Jassa Singh Ahluwalia.[11]
Expansion of power
Sikh misls hold a diplomatic meeting, 18th century painting
By the early 1750s, the Sikhs had started taking-over territory in the Bari Doab, which was where the capital of the Mughal province was located.[9] By 1750, Jai Singh Kanhaiya started issuing orders to local officials of the Bari Doab.[9] Another Sikh leader, named Hakumat Singh, also started issuing orders in the period.[9] Jassa Singh Ahluwalia conquered Fatehabad in 1753.[9] In 1754, the Sikhs had started obstructing Mughal administrative operations in the Punjab, with them causing issues with the appointments of the faujdars of Eminadbad (Khwaja Mirza Khan) and Patti (Qasim Beg).[9] During the Afghan invasions of India, the Sikhs nearly overpowered the Afghan official Jahan Khan near the end of 1757.[9] The Afghan faujdar of Jalandhar, Sa'adat Khan Afridi, was expelled by the Sikhs in early 1758, with Lahore also being plundered.[9] Ahmad Shah Abadali, who was busy contending with the Marathas (who had their own territorial ambitions in the Punjab), was unable to establish a firm control over the Punjab, as all the Afghan governors of the province were being defeated by the Sikhs, such as the Afghan governor of Lahore province in September 1761.[9] Due to these factors, the Sikhs were able to establish their rule over the Punjab.[9] However, the Durranis massacred around 5,000 Sikhs in an event known as the Vadda Ghallughara, but six months later the Afghans were defeated by the Sikhs at Amritsar and they retreated to Lahore.[9] Eventually, Abdali went back to Kabul and the Afghan appointed faujdars of Bist Jalandhar Doab, Sirhind, Rechna Doab, and Chajj Doab, were removed from their positions by the Sikhs.[9]
After the fall of Sirhind in 1764, the territory located south of the Sutlej river between Karnal and Ferozepore was jointly administered by the Shaheedan (and Nihangs), Bhangis, Ahluwalias, Dallewalias, Ramgarhias, and Karosinghias misls.[12] Aside from the misls, there were also the Phulkian Sikhs, who had established the chiefdoms of Patiala, Nabha, Jind, Faridkot, Ambala, Shahabad, Thanesar, Kaithal, Jagadhri, and Buria.[9]
Initially, the most powerful misls were the Ahluwalias, Ramgarhias, and Faizulpurias, but later the Bhangis became hegemonic, especially in the Majha region.[12] According to J. S. Grewal, there were more than sixty Sikh-ruled principalities situated between the Yamuna and Indus rivers by the 1770s.[9] By the 1770s, the leaders of the Sikh misls had started acting independently in their relations, with there being decreasing unity amongst the misls, with rivalries forming based on different alliances.[9] Thus, internal divisions began, with infighting between the Ramgarhias, Ahluwalias, and Kanhaiyas.[9] The Ahluwalias, Sukerchakias, Bhangis, Kanhaiyas, and Ramgarhias started asserting control over the states of the Punjab Hills region, becoming their suzerain.[9] The Bhangis conquered Multan and held it until 1780.[9] The Sikh chiefs located between the Sutlej and Yamuna rivers established the Rakhi tax during their incursions past the Yamuna river rather than seeking territorial acquistions.[9]
Decline
Most of the Sikh principalities established in the 18th century survived until the 19th century, when they were either absorbed or subjugated by the Sukerchakias.[9] The Sukerchakias under Ranjit Singh would finally gain pre-eminance amongst all of its contemporary misls, leading to all of their annexations by the Sukerchakias and the eventual formation of a Sikh Empire in 1799.[12] Ranjit Singh of the Sukerchakia Misl managed to subdue most of the other misls by the end of the 18th century.[9] However, the Phulkian Sikhs and their kingdoms escaped this fate and continued to be independent from the Sukerchakias.[12] In the 19th century, the former misls had lost their political and martial functions, yet their names became caste-markers for certain communities, such as the Thokas adopting the Ramgarhia name and the Kalals adopting the name Ahluwalia.[12]
Each Misl was made up of members of soldiers, whose loyalty was given to the Misl's leader. A Misl could be composed of a few hundred to tens of thousands of soldiers. Any soldier was free to join whichever Misl he wished, and was free to cancel his membership of the Misl to whom he belonged. He could, if he wanted, cancel his membership of his old Misl and join another. The Barons would allow their armies to combine or coordinate their defences together against a hostile force if ordered by the Misldar Supreme Commander. These orders were only issued in military matters affecting the whole Sikh community. These orders would normally be related to defense against external threats, such as Afghan military attacks. The profits of a fighting action were divided by the misls to individuals based on the service rendered after the conflict using the sardari system.
The Sikh Confederacy is a description of the political structure, of how all the barons' chiefdoms interacted with each other politically together in Punjab. Although misls varied in strength, the use of primarily light cavalry with a smaller amount heavy cavalry was uniform throughout all of the Sikh misls. Cavalrymen in a misl were required to supply their own horses and equipment.[14] A standard cavalryman was armed with a spear, matchlock, and scimitar.[15] How the armies of the Sikh misls received payment varied with the leadership of each misl. The most prevalent system of payment was the 'Fasalandari' system; soldiers would receive payment every six months at the end of a harvest.[16]
The Misls primarily employed cavalry in warfare. Detail of a depiction of a Misl-era Sikh cavalry warrior from a map of the Lahore Subah commissioned by Jean Baptiste Joseph Gentil, ca.1770
Fauja Singh considers the Sikh misls to be guerrilla armies, although he notes that the Sikh misls generally had greater numbers and a larger number of artillery pieces than a guerrilla army would.[14] The misls were primarily cavalry based armies and employed less artillery than Mughal or Maratha armies. The misls adapted their tactics to their strength in cavalry and weakness in artillery and avoided pitched battles. Misls organized their armies around bodies of horsemen and their units fought battles in a series of skirmishes, a tactic which gave them an advantage over fighting pitched battles. Bodies of cavalry would attack a position, retreat, reload their muskets, and return to attack it again. The tactics used by misl field armies include flanking an enemy, obstructing river passages, cutting off a unit from its supplies, intercepting messengers, attacking isolated units like foraging parties, employing hit-and-run tactics, overrunning camps, and attacking baggage trains. To fight large armies the misl would completely evacuate the areas in front of the enemy's marching route but follow in the rear of the opposition and reconquer areas the enemy had just captured, threaten agents of the enemy with retribution, and sweep over the countryside in the wake of the enemy's withdrawal.
The Running Skirmish was a tactic unique to the Sikh cavalrymen which was notable for its effectiveness and the high degree of skill required to execute it. George Thomas and George Forster, contemporary writers who witnessed it described its use separately in their accounts of the military of the Sikhs. George Forster noted:
"A party from forty to fifty, advance in a quick pace to a distance of carbine shot from the enemy and then, that the fire may be given with the greatest certainty, the horses are drawn up and their pieces discharged, when speedily, retiring about a 100 paces, they load and repeat the same mode of annoying the enemy. Their horses have been so expertly trained to a performance of this operation that on receiving a stroke of hand, they stop from a full canter."
Total military strength
In 1746, H. T. Prinsep estimated the total strength of the Sikh Confederacy's military (Dal Khalsa Ji) to be 69,500 horsemen (incl. the Phulkians).[12] Other contemporary estimates are Browne's estimate of 73,000 cavalry and 25,000 infantry or George Thomas' estimate of 60,000 cavalry and 5,000 infantry.[12]
The misls formed a commonwealth that was described by Swiss adventurer Antoine Polier as a natural "aristocratic republic".[17] Each misl was a confederacy of Sikh horsemen that was headed by a leader known as a sardar, who held the position of misldar.[12] Although the misls were unequal in strength, and each misl attempted to expand its territory and access to resources at the expense of others, they acted in unison in relation to other states.[6] The misls held biannual meetings of their legislature, the Sarbat Khalsa in Amritsar.[6] According to Hans Herrli, the various misls were not organized along the same lines as one another.[12] Some were akin to large, family clans whilst others resembled brotherhoods (Nishanwalia Misl), or religious-orders (Shaheedan Misl).[12] The size, prominence, and strength of each misl also varied considerably based on any particular point of time.[12] By the last quarter of the 18th century, the individual misl leaders had begun acting independently in their relations.[9]
The remainder was separated into Puttees or parcels for each Surkunda, and these were again subdivided and parcelled out to inferior leaders, according to the number of horse they brought into the field. Each took his portion as a co-sharer, and held it in absolute independence.
The Sikh Misls had four different classes of administrative divisions. The patadari, misaldari, tabadari, and jagirdari were the different systems of land tenure used by the misls, and land granted by the misl left the responsibility of establishing law and order to the owner of the land. The land under the direct administration of the chief of the misl was known as the sardari and the tabadari and jagirdari systems used land directly given by the chief from the sardari. The patadari and misaldari systems formed the basis of a misl, while tabadari and jagirdari lands would only be created after large acquisitions of land. The type of system that was used in an area depended on the importance of the chief sardar of the area to the rest of the misl.
Leadership
Painting of three seated Sikh sardars (from left-to-right): Nahar Singh, Karam Singh Sidhu of the Shaheedan Misl, and Lehna Singh Kahlon of the Bhangi Misl, circa late 18th century
Jassa Singh Ahluwalia was initially appointed as the head of the misls in 1748.[11] However, there were a host of different leaders, from more notable ones to petty ones of lesser-importance.[9] Some of the most important leaders of the Sikh Confederacy in Lahore province were: Jassa Singh Ahluwalia, Charat Singh Sukerchakia, Hari Singh Bhangi (and his two sons, Jhanda Singh and Ganda Singh), Jai Singh Kanhaiya, Gujjar Singh, and Jassa Singh Ramgarhia.[9] Leaders with a medium-level of importance were Buddh Singh in the Jalandhar Doab, Hakikat Singh in the Bari Doab, Sahib Singh Sialkotia in the Rechna Doab, and Milkha Singh Thehpuria in the Sindh Sagar Doab.[9] As for smaller leaders, they were numerous.[9] In Delhi province, the leaders were amongst the Phulkian states.[9]
Patadari system
The Patadari system affected newly annexed territories and was the original method used by the misls in administering land.[18] The patadari system relied on the cooperation of surkundas, the rank of a leader of a small party of cavalrymen. The chief of the misl would take his/her portion and divide the other parcels among his Sardars proportional to the number of cavalrymen they had contributed to the misl.[19] The Sardars would then divide their parcels among their Surkundas, and then the Surkundas subdivided the land they received among their individual cavalrymen. The Surkundas receiving parcels of land with settlements were required to fortify them[note 2] and establish fines and laws for their zamindars and ryots.[20] Parcels of land in the patadari system could not be sold, but could be given to relatives in an inheritance.[21] The soldiers who received parcels from the Patadari system held their land in complete freedom.[6]
Misaldari system
The Misaldari system applied to sardars with a small number of cavalrymen as well as independent bodies of cavalrymen who voluntarily attached themselves to a misl.[21] They kept the lands they held before joining the misl as an allotment for their cooperation with the misl. The leaders of these groups, called misaldars, could transfer their allegiance and land to another misl without punishment.[21]
Tabadari system
The Tabadari system referred to land under the control of a misl's tabadars. Tabadars served a similar function to retainers in Europe. They were required to serve as cavalrymen to the misl and were subservient to the misl's leader. Although tabadars received their land as a reward, their ownership was subject entirely on the misl's leader.[22] The tabadari grants were only hereditary on the choice of the chief of the misl.
Jagirdari system
The Jagirdari system used the grant of jagirs by the chief of the misl. Jagirs were given by the chief of the misl to relations, dependents, and people who "deserved well".[22] The owners of jagirs were subservient to the chief of the misl as their ownership was subject to his/her needs. Like the Tabadars, jagirdars were subject to personal service when the chief of the misl requested.[22] However, because jagirs entailed more land and profit, they were required to use the money generated by their jagirs to equip and mount a quota of cavalrymen depending on the size of their jagir.[22] Jagirdari grants were hereditary in practice but a misl's chief could revoke the rights of the heir. Upon the death of the owner of a tabadari or jagadari grant, the land would revert to direct control of the chief (sardari).
Rakhi system
The Rakhi system was the payment-for-protection tributary protectorate scheme practiced by the Dal Khalsa of the Sikh Confederacy in the 18th century.[23][24] It was a large source of income to the Sikh Misls.[23][25]
Territory
A Map showing different Misls of Sikh Confederacy
The two main divisions in territory between the misls were between those who were in the Malwa region and those who were in the Majha region. While eleven of the misls were north of the Sutlej river, one, the Phulkian Misl was south of the Sutlej.[26] The Sikhs north of the Sutlej river were known as the Majha Sikhs while the Sikhs that lived south of the Sutlej river were known as the Malwa Sikhs.[27] In the smaller territories were the Dhanigeb Singhs in the Sind Sagar Doab, the Gujrat Singhs in the Jech Doab, the Dharpi Singhs in the Rechna Doab, and the Doaba Singhs in the Jalandhar Doab.[27]
Territories of specific misls
The various constituent misls did not have clearly defined territories from one another yet some areas had higher concentrations of Sikhs allying themselves with a particular misl.[12] The particular tract of territory that each misl dominated are as follows:[12][28]
Bhangi Misl: most of western Punjab between Multan and the Hill States, including the settlements of Lahore, Amritsar, Gujrat, and Sialkot.[12] The Bhangis held the Upper Rechna Doab, Upper Chajj Doab, and territory around Lahore and Amritsar.[28]
Sukerchakia Misl: south of the Bhangis, dominating the tract of land between the Chenab and Ravi rivers, including the settlements of Gujranwala and Wazirabad.[12] The Sukerchakias held territory in the Rechna Doab.[28]
Nakai Misl: along the Ravi river, between Multan and Kasur, including the settlements of Sharqpur, Chuniau, Gugera, Dipalpur, Satgarha, and Kot Kamalia.[12] The Nakais held territory in northern Multan and the Lower Bari Doab.[28]
Kanhaiya Misl: between Amritsar and the Punjab Hills, with Taragarh, Mirthal, Fathepur, and a small territory near Mukerian with Sohian and Hajipur.[12] The Kanhaiyas held territory in the Upper Bari Doab.[28]
Dallewalia Misl: regions on the right-bank of the upper Sutlej river.[12] The Dallewalias held territory in parts of Jalandhar and northern Malwa.[28]
Ahluwalia Misl: areas on the left-bank of the Sutlej river.[12] The Ahluwalias held territory in the Bist-Jalandhar and accepted tribute from chiefs of Malwa, the Punjab Hills, the Gangetic Plains, Rajasthan, and the Upper Bari Doab.[28]
Ramgarhia Misl: towards the hills between the Ahluwalia and Dallewalia.[12] The Ramgarhias held territory in the Upper Jalandhar Doab and parts of Malwa.[28]
Karorsinghia Misl: small territories held eastward from the Sutlej river and also Chhachhrauli (which later formed into Kalsia State).[12] The Karorsinghias held territory in southeastern Malwa and the Upper Gangetic Doab.[28]
Faizulpuria Misl: along the right-bank of the Beas river and on both banks of the Sutlej, controlling settlements such as Ludhiana, Jalandar, Nurpur, and northwestern Ambala.[12] They Faizulpurias held territory in the Jalandhar Doab and accepted tributes from the Delhi region.[28]
Nishanwalia Misl: Shahabad, ArnIo, and most of Ambala[12] The Nishanwalias held territory in northern Malwa.[28]
Shaheedan Misl (and Nihangs): jointly controlled parts of the Punjab Plains southward of the Sutlej river, between Karnal and Ferozepore, alongside other misls.[12] The Shaheedans held territory in eastern Malwa.[28]
Phulkian Misl: controlled territory between Sirhind and Delhi, forming the Sikh kingdoms of Patiala, Nabha, Jind, and Kaithal.[12] The Phulkians held territory in southern Malwa.[28]
List of sovereign states under the Sikh Confederacy
Raja Fateh Singh would be allied with the Sikh Empire under Maharaja Ranjit Singh and later became the princely state of Kapurthala after the second Anglo-Sikh war[36]
Ahmad Shah Batalia, Appendix to Sohan Lal Suri's Umdat-ut-Tawarikh. Daftar I, Lahore, 1X85, p.15; Bute Shahs Tawarikh-i-Punjab, Daftar IV, (1848), (MS., Ganda Singh's personal collection. Patiala), p.6; Kanaihya Lal, Tarikh-i-Punjab, Lahore, 1877, p.88; Ali-ud-Din Mufti, Ibratnama, Vol. I, (1854), Lahore, 1961, p.244. Muhammad Latif, History of the Punjab (1891), Delhi, 1964, p.296.
Ian Heath, The Sikh Army, 1799–1849 (Men-at-arms), Osprey (2005) ISBN1-84176-777-8
Harbans Singh, The Heritage of the Sikhs, second rev. ed., Manohar (1994) ISBN81-7304-064-8
Hari Ram Gupta, History of the Sikhs: Sikh Domination of the Mughal Empire, 1764–1803, second ed., Munshiram Manoharlal (2000) ISBN81-215-0213-6
Hari Ram Gupta, History of the Sikhs: The Sikh Commonwealth or Rise and Fall of the Misls, rev. ed., Munshiram Manoharlal (2001) ISBN81-215-0165-2
Gian Singh, Tawarikh Guru Khalsa, (ed. 1970), p.261.
Notes
↑ According to Dilgeer, the decision to formalize the eleven misls happened on 29 March 1748.[13]
↑ The owners of larger villages were required to erect stockades and ditches while the owners of towns erected either keeps or forts.[19]
↑ The Kalal founders of the Ahluwalia Misl claimed descent from Jats.[28]
↑ The Panjgarhia misl was further divided into the Sham Singh and Kalsias. The Kalsias were subdivided into the Landpindian and Barapindian.[27]
↑ Gandhi, Surjit Singh (1 February 2008). "13 Khalsa Battles Against Islamic Imperialism and Hindu Conservatism". History of Sikh Gurus Retold: 1606–1708 C.E. Atlantic Publishing. p.814. ISBN978-81-269-0858-5.
1 2 3 Singh, Satnam (15 October 2024). "Significant Events". The Road to Empire: The Political Education of Khalsa Sikhs in the Late 1600s. University of California Press. pp.xix–xxii. ISBN9780520399372.
↑ McLeod, William Hewat (20 July 1998). "Sikhism: The 18th and 19th centuries". Britannica. Retrieved 16 August 2025. After the execution of Banda, the Sikhs endured several decades of persecution by the Mughals, though there were occasional periods of peace. Only the Sikhs of the Khalsa—whose identity could be easily recognized by their uncut hair and flowing beards—were persecuted; other Sikhs were seldom affected. This period, nonetheless, is remembered by Sikhs as one of great suffering, accompanied by acts of great bravery by many Khalsa Sikhs in their struggle against the Mughal authorities in Lahore.
1 2 3 4 Singh, Harbans. The Encyclopedia of Sikhism. Vol.2: E-L. Punjabi University, Patiala. pp.362–3.
↑ Bajwa, Sandeep Singh. "Misal Nakai". Archived from the original on 15 August 2018. Retrieved 24 April 2016.
↑ Bhagata, Siṅgha (1993). A History of the Sikh Misals. Publication Bureau, Punjabi University. p.241. Deep Singh Shahid, a mazhabi sikh and resident of the village of Pohuwind of the pargana of Amritsar...
↑ Singh, Dalbir (2010). "1: Historical Background (Emergence of Bhangi Misal)". Rise, Growth and Fall of the Bhangi Misal. Patiala: Department of History, Punjabi University. pp.32–34.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
