Soanian

Last updated
Soanian
Geographical range Indian subcontinent [1]
Period Quaternary
Datesc.774,000–114,000BCE or c.11,700BCE [2] [3]
Type site Siwalik region [1]
Major sites Siwalik Hills [1]

The Soanian culture is a prehistoric technological culture from the Siwalik Hills in the Indian subcontinent. [1] [4] It is named after the Soan Valley in Pakistan. [5] Soanian sites are found along the Siwalik region in present-day India, Nepal and Pakistan. [6] The Soanian culture has been approximated to have taken place during the Middle Pleistocene period or the mid-Holocene epoch (Northgrippian). [7] [8] Debates still goes on today regarding the exact period occupied by the culture due to artefacts often being found in non-datable surface context. [7] This culture was first discovered and named by the anthropology and archaeology team led by Helmut De Terra and Thomas Thomson Paterson. [7] Soanian artifacts were manufactured on quartzite pebbles, cobbles, and occasionally on boulders, all derived from various fluvial sources on the Siwalik landscape. Soanian assemblages generally comprise varieties of choppers, discoids, scrapers, cores, and numerous flake type tools, all occurring in varying typo-technological frequencies at different sites. [9]

Contents

Excluding some localities in the Soan Valley of Pakistan, the site complex of Guler (Beas Valley) and Toka in India, and the Arjun-3 site in Nepal, Soanian and similar assemblages rarely comprise more than a few dozen artifacts. The emergence of Soanian tools has been tied to the local development of boulder conglomerate formation through prehistoric tectonic processes that created convenient transporting system for raw materials. [8]

Recent researches have been focusing on the technological culture's connection with the Harappan culture that originated near the Indus River. [7]

Dating and historical significance

The prehistoric dating of Soanian culture is one that has been debated by scholars due to artefacts being often found in undatable surface contexts. [7] Some argue it is a culture developed by ancient extinct hominids; Homo erectus. [10] Others have suggested it is the creation of a group of deurbanized population derived from the Harappan civilization near the Indus alluvial plain. [7] Its artefacts are often found near those of Acheulian culture, which is a Homo erectus culture that took place around the same sub-Himalayan culture zone. [10] There is currently no evidence of the two cultures ever crossing path and is believed to have existed in different timeframe. [10] There are currently two main interpretations towards the prehistoric timeframe occupied by the Soanian culture. One sees the Soanian culture as a period that took place in three connecting intervals throughout Middle Pleistocene period (774,000 to 129,000 years ago). [11] [8] The other sees the Soanian culture as a period of single distinct technological culture that may have existed earliest from the mid-Holocene epoch with some artefacts potentially belonging to the Harappan culture. [7] [12]

Three-interval period theory

According to this view, Soanian technological culture evolved throughout three broad intervals during the Middle Pleistocene period from circa 774,000 to 129,000 years ago. [11] [8] Scholars of this view believe the technological culture potentially belonged to the ancient hominid group: homo erectus. [10] The three intervals are known as Pre-Soan, Early Soan, and Late-Soan. [13] The exact dating of these periods is unknown due to tools often being found in undateable surface contexts. [7] [8] This view is developed out of Helmut de Terra and Thomas Thomson Paterson's early work in the Siwalik region. [7] [8] Paterson, in analysing the terrace sequence along the Soan valley in Pakistan, believed that several Soanian technological phases existed within the glacial and interglacial period. [8] Pre-Soan and Early Soanian tools are considered as mostly heavy-duty tools like choppers and core scrapers derived from Lower paleolithic technological culture of the region. [7] These tools contrast with Late-Soan tools which consist of flake tools that are smaller in sizes and for finer purposes. [7]

Single distinct technological culture

Scholars of this view suggest Soanian technology did not evolve in three intervals, but rather all belong to one distinct period in early homo sapien history during the mid-Holocene epoch. [7] Scholars began to question the three-interval theory when both early Soanian tools and Late-Soanians tools started to be found together along the same undatable sites. [7] To continue, the Soan river 'terraces' observed by de Terra and Paterson were later discovered to be erosional features rather than terrace sequences that would suggest the prehistorical timing of the artefacts. [7] Second, new findings by the father and son duo Anujot Singh Soni and Vidwan Singh Soni have found Soanian tools on datable sites near Northwestern sub-Himalaya. [7] These sites were dated to be from mid to late mid-Holocene. [7] On some of the sites, potsherds and weathered red ware with coarse fabric were also discovered. [7] These artefacts are believed to have belonged to the Harappan civilization that later lived in villages on the sub-Himalayas. [7] These are early human civilizations that emerged from antecedent agricultural communities of hills bouldering the Indus alluvial plain. [7]

Anthropological relation to homo sapiens

Anatomically modern humans (i.e. Homo sapiens) are believed to emerge from Africa within the Soanian time period around 300,000 years ago, it's been argued that their ways of life changed relatively little from that of archaic humans of the Middle Paleolithic. [14] It would remain this way until about 50,000 years ago, when discoveries of a marked increase in the diversity of artefacts found were associated with modern human remains.

Geographical context

Soan River near Chakri Soan River near Chakri.jpg
Soan River near Chakri
Example of a boulder conglomerate - not of Siwalik region Ferruginous quartz-pebble conglomerate (boulder in "Sharon Conglomerate", Lower Pennsylvanian; Jackson North roadcut, Ohio, USA) 10 (37715579786).jpg
Example of a boulder conglomerate - not of Siwalik region

The Soanian culture is in the Western part of the Sub-Himalayan terrain, stretching between river Indus and Yamuna. [8] This area is the major producer of Soanian artefacts. The occurrence of this technological culture has been correlated to the prehistoric geographical changes in the region that allowed prehistoric humans easy access to raw materials.

This view is often hypothesized to have been the result of boulder conglomerate formation in the Siwalik region between 0.7 to 1.7 million years ago. [8] These formations are collections of large rocks made of small fragments that have been deposed through tectonic processes, they can look like levitated ranges or hills. [8] The tectonic process also formed rivers and fluvial systems that carried and collected raw materials, such as distal alluvial fans and proximal distal braided stream systems. [8] In the Siwalik region, the dominant raw materials available are quartzite pebbles, cobbles, and boulders. [8]

From 1.6 million years ago onwards, the existing boulder conglomerate formation saw more changes that further contributed to easy access of raw materials for local ancient humans. Further tectonic movements and erosion saw the Siwalik fluvial courses altered –developing more complex river systems, and deposits that carried and collected sediments. [8] This also contributed to new drainage systems formed by new alluvial conditions in the South Siwalik region. [8] These new developments allowed for the easy access of materials and prevents the need for long-distance transport. [8] This geographical context the Soanian culture developed from is known to scholars as the Post-Boulder Conglomerate Formation period. [8]

Scholars of the single interval period argue Soanian tools are developed due to the movement of the Harappan culture. [7] During the mid-Holocene global arid phase, when water supply starts to dry up across the globe, the Harappans who were originally around the Indus valley mostly shifted to the sub-Himalayas in search of water sources. [7] This led to the diminishing of the broad trading system of resources within the civilization that included materials like metal. [7] As a result, Harappans started to manufacture tools using stones that are later discovered to be Soanian tools. [7] This period has been viewed as a process of deurbanization of the Harappan culture, where they began to decrease in size, turning into smaller village-type settlements. [7]

On a broader geographical context, Soanian culture is one of many different lithic cultures in Southeast Asia that are also abundantly available in Sub-Himalayas. [7] Many unifacial flake tools belonging to the Hoabinhians are discovered near Soanian sites. [7] These tools are also found throughout Nepal, South China, Taiwan and Australia. [7] Another prominent lithic culture in the region belongs to the Acheulians, which are distinguished by the preference for bifacial tools. [7] [10]

Post-Siwalik fluvial deposits

Most of the post-Siwalik fluvial deposits today are mostly disintegrated, they currently lie above older decomposed sedimentary deposits. [8] Some of them are covered in thick vegetation. These sites stand in contrast with remaining deposits that still stand today, forming basin like structures. [8]

Technologies

unifacial chopper Canto tallado-Tipo 11.jpg
unifacial chopper
neolithic lithic scraper Neolithic lithic scraper (FindID 989389).jpg
neolithic lithic scraper

Understandings for the technological development of Soanian tools have been limited due to most sites rarely comprising more than a few dozen artefacts. [10] The technologies of Soanian culture are stone based and are often described as non-bifacial assemblages. [8] These tools are categorized based on their unifacial nature with a singular flat surface. [15] Soanian assemblages generally comprise varieties of choppers, discoids, scrapers, cores, and numerous flake type tools. [8] These tools are mainly for heavy duty, but also have finer purposes as seen in some flake tools used for cutting. [15] These tools are often manufactured on quartzite pebbles, cobbles, and occasionally from boulders. [8] With Soanian technologies being limited, tools often remain similar in shape and sizes to their sourced materials. [10] Soanian technological culture differ largely from other pre-historic culture in the region. Other cultures found in Siwalik like the Ancheulian are often described to be of bi-facial nature and focused on hand axes. [16] The comparison between other culture of the same region has seen Soanian technology categorized as a continuation of archaic technology rather than Neolithic. [7] This is due to Soanian culture often being isolated within the mountainous region away from plain populations who have access to more materials. [7]

Perspective of the singular interval scholars

Scholars of the singular interval period view the development of Soanian technology as a result of the deurbanization of the Harappan culture. [7] This group was originally thought to have had large trading networks with intricate tools, as well as their own scripting system. [7] However, due to the change of climate during the mid-Holocene epoch, many original settlements collapsed in search of water and have been reduced in size. [7] The group began adopting tools that were more easily accessible. [7]

Excavation history and current studies

India location map.svg
Map of the Indian subcontinent showing important sites of the Soanian culture.

The Western Sub-Himalaya and the Siwalik Hills first caught the interest of archaeologists and palaeontologists in the early 1800s when fossil apes of the Miocene age were uncovered. [8] This led to interests from Western scholars to explore the region for potential pre-historic cultural artefacts. The first official discovery of lithic artifacts in the Western Sub-Himalaya zone was reported in 1880 by Theobald W, in a report titled: “On the discovery of a celt of Palaeolithic type in the Punjab”. [8] Discoveries in the Siwalik Hills for paleolithic lithic occurrences were first noted by Wadia and K.R.U Todd. [8] Their research influenced the academic duo of Helmut De Terra and Thomas Thomson Paterson to conduct their own research in the region. [8] De Terra and Paterson deemed the artefacts found in Siwalik belonged to a specific technological culture that they named “Soanian”. [8] They did not conduct any excavation but only focused on selectively collected surface materials from surrounding terraces. [8] This work confirmed lithic occurrence specific to the region and prompted further research. [8] Excavations later followed suit outside of India, taking place in Pakistan and Nepal that further confirms the existence of pre-historic culture in the Siwalik zone. [8]

Modern research

Recent research predominantly takes place in India led by Indian scholars with a broader scope. [8] As of 2006, the study area encompassed the Siwalik frontal slopes and some interior zones between the Ghaggar River to the west and Markanda River to the east. [8] The area is approximately 60 km long and covers an area of approximately 100 km square. [8] Research area in Pakistan along the Soan river has faced damages due to sewage disposal and municipal waste onto rivers. [8]

Methods for modern day excavation have also changed from the time of De Terra. During his time, scholars focused more on assessing the scattering patterns of tools in smaller sampled regions. [8] Modern observations due to technological developments are focused on the occurrence of Soanian tools as a complex behavioural system. [8] This method entails the careful surveying and recording of artefacts along vast regions, seeking to understand the spatial relationship each lithic culture has with one another. [8] This form of observation has allowed scholars to observe the relations of the emergence of certain tools to certain geographical contexts. [8]

At Adiala and Khasala Kalan, about 16 km (9.9 mi) from Rawalpindi terrace on the bend of the river, hundreds of edged pebble tools were discovered. At Chauntra in Himachal Pradesh, hand axes and cleavers were found. Tools up to two million years old have been recovered. In the Soan River Gorge, many fossil bearing rocks are exposed on the surface. 14 million year old fossils of gazelle, rhinoceros, crocodile, giraffe and rodents have been found there. Some of these fossils are on display at the Pakistan Museum of Natural History in Islamabad.[ citation needed ]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stone Age</span> Prehistoric period during which stone was widely used by humans to make tools and weapons

The Stone Age was a broad prehistoric period during which stone was widely used to make stone tools with an edge, a point, or a percussion surface. The period lasted for roughly 3.4 million years and ended between 4,000 BC and 2,000 BC, with the advent of metalworking. It therefore represents nearly 99.3% of human history. Though some simple metalworking of malleable metals, particularly the use of gold and copper for purposes of ornamentation, was known in the Stone Age, it is the melting and smelting of copper that marks the end of the Stone Age. In Western Asia, this occurred by about 3,000 BC, when bronze became widespread. The term Bronze Age is used to describe the period that followed the Stone Age, as well as to describe cultures that had developed techniques and technologies for working copper alloys into tools, supplanting stone in many uses.

In archaeology, lithic analysis is the analysis of stone tools and other chipped stone artifacts using basic scientific techniques. At its most basic level, lithic analyses involve an analysis of the artifact's morphology, the measurement of various physical attributes, and examining other visible features.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timeline of Indian history</span> Notable events in the history of India and predecessor states

This is a timeline of Indian history, comprising important legal and territorial changes and political events in India and its predecessor states. To read about the background to these events, see History of India. also see the list of governors-general of India, list of prime ministers of India and Years in India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acheulean</span> Archaeological culture associated with Homo erectus

Acheulean, from the French acheuléen after the type site of Saint-Acheul, is an archaeological industry of stone tool manufacture characterized by the distinctive oval and pear-shaped "hand axes" associated with Homo erectus and derived species such as Homo heidelbergensis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Levallois technique</span> Distinctive type of stone knapping technique used by ancient humans

The Levallois technique is a name given by archaeologists to a distinctive type of stone knapping developed around 250,000 to 300,000 years ago during the Middle Palaeolithic period. It is part of the Mousterian stone tool industry, and was used by the Neanderthals in Europe and by modern humans in other regions such as the Levant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sivalik Hills</span> Mountain range in India and Nepal

The Sivalik Hills, also known as the Shivalik Hills and Churia Hills, are a mountain range of the outer Himalayas that stretches over about 2,400 km (1,500 mi) from the Indus River eastwards close to the Brahmaputra River, spanning the northern parts of the Indian subcontinent. It is 10–50 km (6.2–31.1 mi) wide with an average elevation of 1,500–2,000 m (4,900–6,600 ft). Between the Teesta and Raidāk Rivers in Assam is a gap of about 90 km (56 mi). The literal translation of "Sivalik" is 'tresses of Shiva'. Sivalik region is home to the Soanian archaeological culture. The hills are well known for their Neogene and Pleistocene aged vertebrate fossils.

Hoabinhian is a lithic techno-complex of archaeological sites associated with assemblages in Southeast Asia from late Pleistocene to Holocene, dated to c. 10,000–2000 BCE. It is attributed to hunter-gatherer societies of the region and their technological variability over time is poorly understood. In 2016 a rockshelter was identified in Yunnan (China), where artifacts belonging to the Hoabinhian technocomplex were recognized. These artifacts date from 41,500 BCE.

In archaeology, lithic technology includes a broad array of techniques used to produce usable tools from various types of stone. The earliest stone tools to date have been found at the site of Lomekwi 3 (LOM3) in Kenya and they have been dated to around 3.3 million years ago. The archaeological record of lithic technology is divided into three major time periods: the Paleolithic, Mesolithic, and Neolithic. Not all cultures in all parts of the world exhibit the same pattern of lithic technological development, and stone tool technology continues to be used to this day, but these three time periods represent the span of the archaeological record when lithic technology was paramount. By analysing modern stone tool usage within an ethnoarchaeological context, insight into the breadth of factors influencing lithic technologies in general may be studied. See: Stone tool. For example, for the Gamo of Southern Ethiopia, political, environmental, and social factors influence the patterns of technology variation in different subgroups of the Gamo culture; through understanding the relationship between these different factors in a modern context, archaeologists can better understand the ways that these factors could have shaped the technological variation that is present in the archaeological record.

The Paleo-Arctic Tradition is the name given by archaeologists to the cultural tradition of the earliest well-documented human occupants of the North American Arctic, which date from the period 8000–5000 BC. The tradition covers Alaska and expands far into the east, west, and the Southwest Yukon Territory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cleaver (Stone Age tool)</span> Biface stone tool

In archaeology, a cleaver is a type of biface stone tool of the Lower Palaeolithic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South Asian Stone Age</span> Palaeolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic periods in South Asia

The South Asian Stone Age covers the Palaeolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic periods in the Indian subcontinent. Evidence for the most ancient Homo sapiens in South Asia has been found in the cave sites of Cudappah of India, Batadombalena and Belilena in Sri Lanka. In Mehrgarh, in what is today western Pakistan, the Neolithic began c. 7000 BCE and lasted until 3300 BCE and the first beginnings of the Bronze Age. In South India, the Mesolithic lasted until 3000 BCE, and the Neolithic until 1400 BCE, followed by a Megalithic transitional period mostly skipping the Bronze Age. The Iron Age in India began roughly simultaneously in North and South India, around c. 1200 to 1000 BCE.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Middle Stone Age</span> Period in African prehistory

The Middle Stone Age was a period of African prehistory between the Early Stone Age and the Late Stone Age. It is generally considered to have begun around 280,000 years ago and ended around 50–25,000 years ago. The beginnings of particular MSA stone tools have their origins as far back as 550–500,000 years ago and as such some researchers consider this to be the beginnings of the MSA. The MSA is often mistakenly understood to be synonymous with the Middle Paleolithic of Europe, especially due to their roughly contemporaneous time span; however, the Middle Paleolithic of Europe represents an entirely different hominin population, Homo neanderthalensis, than the MSA of Africa, which did not have Neanderthal populations. Additionally, current archaeological research in Africa has yielded much evidence to suggest that modern human behavior and cognition was beginning to develop much earlier in Africa during the MSA than it was in Europe during the Middle Paleolithic. The MSA is associated with both anatomically modern humans as well as archaic Homo sapiens, sometimes referred to as Homo helmei. Early physical evidence comes from the Gademotta Formation in Ethiopia, the Kapthurin Formation in Kenya and Kathu Pan in South Africa.

Riwat is a Paleolithic site in Punjab, northern Pakistan. Another site, called Riwat Site 55, shows a later occupation dated to around 45,000 years ago.

Peter Dixon Hiscock is an Australian archaeologist. Born in Melbourne, he obtained a PhD from the University of Queensland. Between 2013 and 2021, he was the inaugural Tom Austen Brown Professor of Australian Archaeology at the University of Sydney, having previously held a position in the School of Archaeology and Anthropology at the Australian National University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archaeological sites in Pakistan</span>

Pakistan is home to many archaeological sites dating from Lower Paleolithic period to Mughal empire. The earliest known archaeological findings belong to the Soanian culture from the Soan Valley, near modern-day Islamabad. Soan Valley culture is considered as the best known Palaeolithic culture of Central Asia. Mehrgarh in Balochistan is one of the most important Neolithic sites dating from 7000 BCE to 2000 BCE. The Mehrgarh culture was amongst the first culture in the world to establish agriculture and livestock and live in villages. Mehrgarh civilization lasted for 5000 years till 2000 BCE after which people migrated to other areas, possibly Harappa and Mohenjo-daro. Harappa and Mohenjo-daro are the best known sites from the Indus Valley civilization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outline of prehistoric technology</span> Overview of and topical guide to prehistoric technology

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to prehistoric technology.

Buur Heybe, which translates to "The Hill of the Potter's Sand", is a late Pleistocene and Holocene archaeological complex located in the largest granite inselberg in the inter-riverine region of the southern Bay province of Somalia approximately 180 km northwest of the capital Mogadishu. Buur Heybe has a longstanding history of archaeological research dating back to the 1930s when Paolo Graziosi carried out the first professional archaeological excavation in Somalia in the rockshelter site of Gogoshiis Qabe in Buur Heybe. Further excavations by J. Desmond Clark in the 1950s and later by the Buur Ecological and Archaeological Project (BEAP) led by Steven Brandt in the 1980s have made Buur Heybe one of the best dated and closely studied archaeological sites in Somalia.

Melkhoutboom Cave is an archaeological site dating to the Later Stone Age, located in the Zuurberg Mountains, Cape Folded Mountain Belt, in the Addo Elephant National Park, Sarah Baartman District Municipality in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kilu Cave</span> Anthropological site in Papua New Guinea

Kilu Cave is a paleoanthropological site located on Buka Island in the Autonomous Region of Bougainville, Papua New Guinea. Kilu Cave is located at the base of a limestone cliff, 65 m (213 ft) from the modern coastline. With evidence for human occupation dating back to 30,000 years, Kilu Cave is the earliest known site for human occupation in the Solomon Islands archipelago. The site is the oldest proof of paleolithic people navigating the open ocean i.e. navigating without land in sight. To travel from Nissan island to Buka requires crossing of at least 60 kilometers of open sea. The presence of paleolithic people at Buka therefore is at the same time evidence for the oldest and the longest paleolithic sea travel known so far.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mlambalasi Rock Shelter</span> National Historic Site of Tanzania

The Mlambalasi Rock Shelter is a historic site located in Iringa District of Iringa Region in southern Tanzania, 50 km away from Iringa City. Excavations in 2006 and 2010 by the Iringa Region Archaeological Project uncovered artifactual deposits from the Later Stone Age (LSA), the Iron Age, and the historic periods, as well as external artifacts from the Middle Stone Age (MSA). Direct dating on Achatina shell and ostrich eggshell beads indicates that the oldest human burials at Mlambalasi are from the terminal Pleistocene. Mlambalasi is characterized by interment LSA and Iron Age periods, as well as by cycles of use and abandonment.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Gwen Robbins Schug; Subhash R. Walimbe (13 April 2016). A Companion to South Asia in the Past. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 39–. ISBN   978-1-119-05547-1. Quote: “Soanian and Soanian‐like assemblages are known throughout the entire Siwalik or Sub‐ Himalayan region, from Pakistan to northeast India including Nepal...”
  2. Petraglia & Allchin 2007, pp. 5–6.
  3. Murray, Tim (1999). Time and Archaeology . London: Routledge. p.  84. ISBN   978-0-415-11762-3.
  4. Lycett, Stephen J. (2007). "Is the Soanian techno-complex a Mode 1 or Mode 3 phenomenon? A morphometric assessment" (PDF). Journal of Archaeological Science. 34 (9): 1434–1440. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2006.11.001.
  5. Paracha, Nadeem F. (February 2, 2017). "Pakistan: The lesser-known histories of an ancient land". DAWN.COM.
  6. Chauhan, Parth R., An Overview of the Siwalik Acheulian & Reconsidering Its Chronological Relationship with the Soanian – A Theoretical Perspective.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Soni, Vidwan Singh; Soni, Anujot Singh (2013-12-08). "New Observations on the Age and Context of Soanian Tools Found in Post-Urban Harappan Sites and Along WTH Se Asian Type Tools on the Mid-Holocene Terraces in the Nw Sub-Himalayas". Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association. 32. doi: 10.7152/bippa.v32i0.13603 . ISSN   1835-1794.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Chauhan, Parth R. (May 2008). "Soanian lithic occurrences and raw material exploitation in the Siwalik Frontal Zone, northern India: a geoarchaeological perspective". Journal of Human Evolution. 54 (5): 591–614. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.09.017. ISSN   0047-2484. PMID   18255121.
  9. Paterson, T.T., Drummond, H.J.H., 1962. Soan the Palaeolithic of Pakistan.Department of Archaeology, Government of Pakistan Karachi.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mohapatra, G. C. (1990). "Soanian-Acheulian Relationship". Bulletin of the Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute. 49: 251–259. JSTOR   42930294.
  11. 1 2 "Pleistocene Epoch | Plants, Animals, Climate, Ice Age, & Facts | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2022-04-07.
  12. "Holocene epoch | Causes, Effects, & Facts | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2022-04-07.
  13. Mohapatra, G. C. (1990). "Soanian-Acheulian Relationship". Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute. 49: 251–259. ISSN   0045-9801.
  14. Rightmire, GP (2009). "Out of Africa: modern human origins special feature: middle and later Pleistocene hominids in Africa and Southwest Asia". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106 (38): 16046–50. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10616046R. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903930106 . PMC   2752549 . PMID   19581595.
  15. 1 2 "hand tool - The Mousterian flake tools | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2022-05-12.
  16. Gaillard, Claire; Singh, Mukesh; Rishi, Kulbhushan Kumar; Bhardwaj, Vipnesh (July 2010). "Atbarapur (Hoshiarpur district, Punjab), the Acheulian of the Siwalik Range within the South Asian context". Comptes Rendus Palevol. 9 (5): 237–243. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2010.06.001. ISSN   1631-0683.

Further reading