Uljin–Samcheok Landings

Last updated
Ulchin-Samcheok landings
Part of the Korean War and the Cold War
PPS-43, compasses and fake ID from the Ulchin-Samcheok Landings.jpg
PPS-43, compasses, grenade, and fake ID from the Ulchin-Samcheok landings at the War Memorial of Korea
DateOctober 30, 1968 – December 26, 1968
Location
Result South Korea–American victory
Belligerents
Flag of South Korea (1949-1984).svg South Korea
Flag of the United States (Pantone).svg  United States
Flag of North Korea.svg  North Korea
Commanders and leaders
Flag of South Korea (1949-1984).svg Park Chung Hee
Flag of the United States (Pantone).svg Charles Bonesteel III Lyndon B Johnson
Flag of North Korea.svg Kim Il Sung
Strength

US 6th Combat Aviation Platoon
26th Rear Area Security Division
Republic of Korea Reserve Forces
Republic of Korea Marine Corps
U.S. 2nd Infantry Division

Total Strength:

Contents


70,000

KPA Unit 124





Total Strength:
120
Casualties and losses
Total casualties:
Flag of South Korea (1949-1984).svg South Korea
63 killed (incl. 23 civilians) [1]
Flag of the United States (Pantone).svg United States
3 killed
3 wounded [2]
Total casualties:
Flag of North Korea.svg North Korea
110 killed
7 captured
3 unaccounted for

DMZ skirmishes and tensions (1966–1967)

A concrete wall and a guard tower at the Korean Demilitarized Zone View of the concrete wall and barbed wire separating South Korea from North Korea Kijong-Dong "Propaganda Village". Note the Communist red star located on the guard tower. The Milit - DPLA - be871a3539dd58b35850eb05c81ba43c.jpeg
A concrete wall and a guard tower at the Korean Demilitarized Zone

The years of 1966 and 1967 were riddled with a number of low-intensity border skirmishes, which mainly involved coordinated DPRK spy activity along the DMZ (avoiding the American guarded sector) accompanied by several firefights. On November 2, 1966, North Korean forces ambushed the 23rd Infantry Regiment two days after U.S. president Lyndon B Johnson's visit to South Korea. In 1967, the number of incidents increased, but they were of lower magnitude, consisting primarily of brief coordinated ambushes which resulted in casualties from both sides, and the destruction of military property such as jeeps and patrol boats. [4]

The DPRK agents also began sizing up the South Korean defenses in order to lay the groundwork for insurrection. Most belonged to the Reconnaissance General Bureau, an important subdivision under the KWP liaison department responsible for a majority of DMZ activity. These guerrilla agents preferred to strike in the favourable conditions of autumn: the longer nights, dry ground, and fog. Unlike the North, the South possessed no counter-guerrilla units in 1966, although by January 1967, motivated by the "November 2nd incident," General Bonesteel and his personal committee devised a new four-layer anti-infiltration strategy to hamper the DPRK under the Counter Infiltration Guerilla Concepts Requirements Plan of 1967. [14] In terms of sea infiltration, the defense was largely left up to the ROKA, which were uncoordinated and ill-equipped with necessary radio and communications. Meanwhile, while the allies fortified their defenses as best they could, Kim launched a domestic crash program to train elite special warfare units, which would eventually amount to the completion of the all-officer 124th and 283d Army Units in 1968. [15]

However, internal tensions were already mounting between the allies. The South Korean leadership demonstrated aggressive hopes of reunification and an escalation of the conflict. However, Bonesteel, according to the United States priority in Vietnam, remained committed only to defending South Korea against DPRK threats. Bonesteel avoided deploying heavy weaponry and artillery in order to avoid entangling South Koreans in the casualties, which Park viewed as representative of the U.S.' uncommitted nature and indecisiveness. [16] Ultimately, Bonesteel intended to keep the status quo in which South Korea played second fiddle to Vietnam, even if it meant costing lives and suppressing the South Korean leadership, while maintaining unceasing vigilance along the border in case of any further major DPRK attack. [17]

Blue House raid and the USS Pueblo incident (1968)

In 1966–67, Kim grew increasingly impatient as his unconventional tactics along the DMZ continued to fail in severing the U.S. and South Korea alliance. Bonesteel and Park seemed to be working closer than ever before, showing signs of developing a capable counter-insurgency plan coordinated with information gathered from failed DPRK attacks. As time began to slip, the DPRK made two bold moves on January in 1968. [18]

The Blue House Korea-Seoul-Blue House (Cheongwadae) Reception Center 0688&9-07 cropped.jpg
The Blue House

First, Kim ordered a band of DPRK commandos to assassinate Park at the Blue House. By doing so, he hoped to agitate the South Korean people to rise up against their government and the "American imperialists." [16] On the evening of the 17th, they penetrated into the U.S. 2nd Infantry Division sector disguised in ROK army uniforms. For two days and nights, they moved in stealth towards Seoul, but made the mistake of trying to indoctrinate villagers on the 19th, who later notified authorities. The commandos were eventually halted by a police contingent just 800 meters from the presidential house, which prompted a nationwide manhunt. [19] The Blue House raid also coincided with the capture of 82 crew members aboard the USS Pueblo (January 23) by disguised North Korean patrol boats.

The USS Pueblo on display in North Korea after its capture Laika ac USS Pueblo (7960099660).jpg
The USS Pueblo on display in North Korea after its capture

These two attacks occurred in tandem with the Tet Offensive in Vietnam, which further burdened the U.S. military effort. Pyongyang welcomed the timing of the Tet Offensive and the sudden seizure of the Pueblo as chances to further dissuade the U.S. from maintaining its presence in South Korea. [20] Meanwhile, the Blue House raid vastly elevated the threat of the DPRK in the eyes of Seoul, but not the U.S., thus threatening to divide the allies. Under these conditions, In the aftermath of January 1968, the U.S.' response was of marked contrast to that of South Korea. President Johnson primarily reacted to the Tet Offensive and the Pueblo incident by ordering Bonesteel to initiate talks with the DPRK through Panmunjom in order to return American hostages.

In comparison, Seoul viewed the Tet Offensive as a sideshow in response to the immense threat of the DPRK, culminating in the creation of Homeland Defense Reserve Forces under Instruction 18. [21] It functioned not only as a militia but also conducted anti-communist education aimed towards rural villagers in order to defeat the indoctrination attempts by the North. [22] The ROK accused the United States of having implemented a policy of appeasement and refused to negotiate with U.S. representatives. However, Park's anger quickly subsided due to fear of losing U.S. backing and an increased flow of military resources into South Korea. By the end of 1968, the DMZ had become increasingly hard to penetrate. However, the same could not be said for the coastal border, where terrain and sub-par technological obstacles provided the DPRK with another avenue of invasion.

Landings

124th Army Unit landing

South Korea topography with the Taebaek Mountains marked South Korea location map topography with taebaek mountains marked.jpg
South Korea topography with the Taebaek Mountains marked
Samcheok Beach, where the 124th Army Unit commandos landed, in 2009 Korea-Samcheok-Beach-01.jpg
Samcheok Beach, where the 124th Army Unit commandos landed, in 2009

The Ulchin–Samcheok landings occurred at midnight on October 30, 1968, along the North Gyeongsang Province and Gangwon Province. In total, 120 North Korean commandos were dispatched from Unit 124. The force was organized into three groups, two of which consisted of 30 troops with one group of 60. These groups avoided detection and landed in eight predetermined locations along the eastern seacoast of South Korea, later separating at the Taebaek Mountains. [4] The target landing areas represented vast expanses of relative wilderness and thus were the weakest zones of the already sub-par surveillance net erected by the Allies. However, the plan was drawn without any knowledge that the area had previously hosted a number of Park's anti-communist programmes, one of which was the Medical Enlightenment teams who had educated rural villagers there just months prior. [23]

Indoctrination attempt

The DPRK prepared to take advantage of social instability, a product of South Korea's economic growth, and part in parcel to Park's rise to power in 1960–61. Kim believed that local, less educated farmers who lived in separation from this new wealth according to traditional, often superstitious lifestyles embodied ripe targets who could easily be indoctrinated according to Juche . [18] The North were also ready to portray the South Korean government as having sold out unification for capitalist resources and economic development, in order to win over their targets by keeping in line with the original concept of reunification. [23]

The DPRK commandos were expecting to be welcomed as long-awaited liberators which led to the conception that indoctrinating South Korean villagers was a readily feasible task. [24] In eight villages, the commandos appeared at daybreak in front of sleepy and confused villagers, dragging them to the local assembly hall to receive lectures and DPRK propaganda. However, the South Koreans were unready to cooperate. Tempers quickly flared and violence broke out. However, amidst the general confusion, word slipped out towards the local police, who alerted the authorities of the invasion. [25]

Manhunt

Upon detection, a 70,000 man ROKA force launched a large-scale operation to apprehend the DPRK commandos. These forces arrived by air, land and sea. Among those deployed were the U.S. 6th Combat Aviation Platoon operating Bell UH-1 Iroquois helicopters summoned by the newly erected U.S.-ROK Operational Planning Staff. The allied counter-infiltration manhunt consisted of thousands of Park's newly created Home Defense Reserves, the 26th Rear Area Security Division, one Republic of Korea Marine Corps battalion and various police companies stationed nearby. [26] Within two weeks, a majority of the commandos were captured or killed, effectively neutralizing the mission. By December 26, Park withdrew the counter-guerrilla alert, signaling the end of the manhunt.

Casualties

After the operation, the ROK announced that 110 DPRK commandos had been killed, while seven were captured. South Korea sustained 63 deaths, 23 of whom were civilians. [27] The other South Koreans killed included army recruits, reserved police forces and militiamen. The U.S. military sustained three deaths and three wounded.

One notable civilian casualty was 9-year-old Lee Seung-bok at his home in the Gybang Mountain. [28]

Aftermath

Reasons for failure

Saemaul Undong gyoyug sajin.jpg
Saemaul Undong

Encouraged by the popularity of the Homeland reserve Force, Park had decided to launch the "New Community Movement" (Saemaul Undong) to ensure the people's loyalty. Park sought to instill a sense of democracy and nationalism, facilitated by elevating living standards in rural areas under the Korean traditional communalism - Hyangyak and Doorae. [29] The first move embodied the construction of "Reconstruction Villages" by populating areas south of the DMZ with ex-soldiers and their families ready to repel northern infiltrators. Next, Park instituted a civil action program requiring ROK soldiers to build basic infrastructure and schools holding anti-communist classes in rural areas as part of the larger counter-propaganda scheme as well as strengthening ties between the military and villagers.

Under the cover of medical assistance, in various localities soldiers were actually trained members of "Medical Enlightenment" teams, whose purpose was to instill support for Park and cultivate a citizenry ready to dismiss the North's Communist line. [29] Meanwhile, under the inspection of General William P. Yarborough, cooperation between the United States Eighth Army and the Korean Augmentation to the United States Army flourished. A new "Cold War Program" included "Welcome to Korea" classes facilitated by American contributions to social welfare in the form of building schools, visiting orphanages, and conducting cultural exchanges at local universities. Overall, the acceptance of American soldiers by the South Korean populace preemptively dispelled the power of North Korean ideology which characterized American soldiers as violent colonizers and foreign occupiers. [30]

Overall, the DPRK strategy lacked discipline and proper logistics. As a result of Park's aggressive policies which rallied popular participation against the DPRK threat, the public transformed into valuable informants for the government. Under the guidance of the Korean National Intelligence Service (NIS), 132 North Korean spies had already been captured by 1967. [4] The North Korean leadership was ignorant of the extent to which South Korean nationalism and citizens were loyal to Park. Additionally, the lack of consistent major offensives prior to the Ulchin-Samcheok landing allowed for the regrouping and unified deployment of allied resources in the form of effective counterinsurgency measures. Ultimately, the DPRK failed to conduct a series of well-orchestrated strikes aimed at continually whithering down their opponent, which contributed to the mission's failure. [31]

Domestic reactions

The success in countering the Ulchin-Samcheok landings validated Park's increased security measures and propaganda campaigns. Prior to the landings, Park's anti-ideological campaigns sought to instill a sense of patriotism and loyalty towards the government. Ulchin-Samcheok became proof that those efforts had not been wasted, and moreover deflected suspicion which regarded Parks top-down assimilation of South Korean military forces under a unified chain of command, as a ploy for consolidating personal power. Instead, South Koreans not only felt protected by Park's regime but also that they had contributed in protecting their country. These two factors allowed Park to consolidate his authority in the eyes of the South Korean people. [16]

In contrast, Kim, in light of the massive DPRK failure, scapegoated his generals. The KWP's position was not that the policy was unpopular in the South but rather that it had been implemented incorrectly. [32] Following two years of unsuccessful guerrilla warfare, punishment by death or imprisonment was implemented for senior military officials responsible for failing to implement the party line. Along with the disbandment of Unit 124, several prominent members of the DPRK who also received punishment included the defense minister - General Kim Chong-bong, KPA chairman - General Ho Pong-haek, and KWP secretary - Cho Tong-chol. [33] After the military purge, Kim resumed unified control over military activity by placing the KWP as a political watchdog over the military. [34]

Diffusion of conflict

John H. Michaelis GEN John H. Michaelis (cropped).jpg
John H. Michaelis

The DPRK's campaign ended in failure. In addition, infighting between Kim's two largest communist benefactors left the DPRK to fend for itself, while the alliance between the U.S. and the ROK gradually strengthened. The loss at Ulchin-Samcheok was the last straw for Kim, who promptly reshuffled the DPRK's ranks and overall military structure. However, these upgrades did not bolster the strength of the DPRK military, nor did it make up for the purge of highly trained and skilled units. By 1969, the DPRK had largely abandoned unconventional warfare, and hostility gradually waned. [35] When KPA forces shot down a U.S. Navy Lockheed EC-121 Warning Star aircraft over the Sea of Japan on April 15 of that year, which were accompanied by several more light skirmishes, these events embodied spurts of overt warfare, rather the steady implementation of highly coordinated and unconventional tactics.

In contrast, allied forces prospered. While the UNC bolstered defenses along the DMZ after Ulchin-Samcheok, the South's economy and population had continued to grow despite DPRK provocations. New security upgrades embodied the steady influx of new military resources such as the usage of powerful F-4D Phantom Jets along the DMZ as well as heightened cooperation between U.S. and ROKA forces. In particular, new ROKA southern and Eastern Coast Security commands were erected to prevent another attempted coastal landing. Between June and December 1969, the ROKA forces scored numerous victories against the dwindling military capacity of the North. [36] Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Defense formalized the diversion of resources from Korea. Ultimately, the fortification of the border dissuaded further DPRK activity. By 1969, conflicts circulating around the DMZ reduced significantly. Bonesteel's 1969 departure and replacement by Korean war hero General John H. Michaelis on October 1, marked the effective end of the conflict.

Post-conflict authoritarianism in South Korea

In handling the Korean DMZ conflict of 1966–1969, Park enabled industrial progress while suppressing the rights of the South Korean people. According to Major Daniel P. Bolger's analysis, Park enjoyed the emergency powers at his disposal in the time of conflict, which he preserved until 1979. The military, intelligence and police forces he consolidated in order to defeat the DPRK were re-calibrated towards suppressing human rights, domestic opponents and restricting freedom of speech and press. [37] The adoption of the Yusin Constitution on November 21, 1972, granted Park full control over South Korea by co-opting the rule of law until his assassination in 1979 at the hands of secret service chief Kim Jae-kyu. Some historians argue that the consolidation of the military established under Park paved the way for continued authoritarianism even after Park's death.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Korean War</span> War between North and South Korea, 1950–1953

The Korean War was an armed conflict on the Korean Peninsula fought between North Korea and South Korea and their allies. North Korea was supported by the People's Republic of China and the Soviet Union, while South Korea was supported by the United Nations Command (UNC) led by the United States. The conflict was the first major proxy war of the Cold War. Fighting ended in 1953 with an armistice but no peace treaty, leading to the ongoing Korean conflict.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Korean conflict</span> Conflict between North and South Korea

The Korean conflict is an ongoing conflict based on the division of Korea between North Korea and South Korea, both of which claim to be the sole legitimate government of all of Korea. During the Cold War, North Korea was backed by the Soviet Union, China, and other communist allies, while South Korea was backed by the United States, United Kingdom, and other Western allies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Korean Demilitarized Zone</span> North-South Korean border barrier

The Korean Demilitarized Zone is a heavily militarized strip of land running across the Korean Peninsula near the 38th parallel north. The demilitarized zone (DMZ) is a border barrier that divides the peninsula roughly in half. It was established to serve as a buffer zone between the sovereign states of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea under the provisions of the Korean Armistice Agreement in 1953, an agreement between North Korea, China, and the United Nations Command.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military Demarcation Line</span> Land border between North and South Korea

The Military Demarcation Line (MDL), sometimes referred to as the Armistice Line, is the land border or demarcation line between North Korea and South Korea. On either side of the line is the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ). The MDL and DMZ were established by the Korean Armistice Agreement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joint Security Area</span> Part of the Korean Demilitarized Zone

The Joint Security Area is the only portion of the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) where North and South Korean forces stand face-to-face. The JSA is used by the two Koreas for diplomatic engagements and, until March 1991, was also the site of military negotiations between North Korea and the United Nations Command (UNC).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles H. Bonesteel III</span> United States Army general

Charles Hartwell Bonesteel III was an American military commander, the son of Major General Charles Hartwell Bonesteel Jr. and grandson of Major Charles H. Bonesteel Sr. (1851–1902). He served in the United States Army during World War II and the Korean War. In the 1960s, he served as commander, United States Forces Korea during the Korean DMZ Conflict (1966–69).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Korean DMZ Conflict</span> 1966–1969 North–South Korea conflict

The Korean DMZ Conflict, also referred to as the Second Korean War by some, was a series of low-level armed clashes between North Korean forces and the forces of South Korea and the United States, largely occurring between 1966 and 1969 along the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Forces Korea</span> American military forces stationed in South Korea

The United States Forces Korea (USFK) is a sub-unified command of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (USINDOPACOM). USFK was initially established in 1957, and encompasses U.S. combat-ready fighting forces and components under the ROK/US Combined Forces Command (CFC) – a supreme command for all of the South Korean and U.S. ground, air, sea and special operations component commands. Major USFK elements include U.S. Eighth Army (EUSA), U.S. Air Forces Korea, U.S. Naval Forces Korea (CNFK), U.S. Marine Forces Korea (MARFORK) and U.S. Special Operations Command Korea (SOCKOR).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northern Limit Line</span> Maritime demarcation line between North and South Korea

The Northern Limit Line or North Limit Line (NLL) – 북방한계선 – is a disputed maritime demarcation line in the Yellow (West) Sea between the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) in the north, and the Republic of Korea (ROK) in the south. This line of military control acts as the de facto maritime boundary between North and South Korea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Command</span> Multinational military force supporting South Korea

United Nations Command is the multinational military force established to support the Republic of Korea during and after the Korean War. It was the first international unified command in history, and the first attempt at collective security pursuant to the Charter of the United Nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Korean axe murder incident</span> 1976 killing of U.S. Army officers by North Koreans

The Korean axe murder incident, also known domestically as the Panmunjom axe atrocity incident, was the killing of two United Nations Command officers, Captain Arthur Bonifas and First Lieutenant Mark Barrett, by North Korean soldiers on August 18, 1976, in the Joint Security Area (JSA) in the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ). The officers, from the United States Army, had been part of a work party cutting down a poplar tree in the JSA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blue House raid</span> 1968 North Korean assassination attempt on South Korean President Park Chung-hee

The Blue House raid, also known in South Korea as the 21 January Incident, was a raid launched by North Korean commandos in an attempt to assassinate President of South Korea Park Chung Hee in his residence at the Blue House in Seoul, on 21 January, 1968. A 31-man team of the Korean People's Army (KPA) infiltrated the DMZ but was intercepted by police near the presidential residence. In the ensuing pursuit, all but two commandos were killed; one was captured, and one fled back to North Korea. South Korean casualties totaled 26 killed and 66 wounded, including about 24 civilians; four Americans also were killed. Park was unharmed.

Unit 124 was a black operations unit of the North Korean Special Operation Forces formed to assassinate South Korean President Park Chung Hee in the Blue House raid in January 1968.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Korean Armistice Agreement</span> 1953 end to Korean War hostilities

The Korean Armistice Agreement is an armistice that brought about a cessation of hostilities of the Korean War. It was signed by United States Army Lieutenant General William Harrison Jr. and General Mark W. Clark representing the United Nations Command (UNC), North Korea leader Kim Il Sung and General Nam Il representing the Korean People's Army (KPA), and Peng Dehuai representing the Chinese People's Volunteer Army (PVA). The armistice was signed on 27 July 1953, and was designed to "ensure a complete cessation of hostilities and of all acts of armed force in Korea until a final peaceful settlement is achieved."

Operation Pokpung was the military invasion of the Republic of Korea (ROK) by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) that triggered the Korean War. The DPRK military began the offensive by crossing the 38th parallel north and entering ROK territory at 04:00 PYT/KST on 25 June 1950; the DPRK government did not issue any declaration of war before the invasion.

Events from the year 1968 in South Korea.

Lee Seung-bok was a 9-year-old South Korean boy who was murdered by North Korean commandos. His murder was widely publicized in South Korea. In the early 1990s, false rumours began to circulate that Lee had never existed and that his death was the creation of South Korean propaganda.

Events from the year 1966 in South Korea.

Task Force 71 (TF-71) has been a naval task force of the United States Navy, active since the 1940s. The Task Force also used to fulfill the function of Command and Coordination Force, Seventh Fleet. The Seventh Fleet Command Ship is USS Blue Ridge, based at U.S. Fleet Activities Yokosuka, Yokosuka, Japan. In 2004, Blue Ridge entered dry dock and the responsibility was transferred temporarily to USS Coronado. Blue Ridge returned to duty 27 September 2004.

References

  1. Bolger Daniel, p.86
  2. Bolger Daniel, p.65
  3. Young-yee Shin, Stella (December 2001). No Longer Forgotten: North Korea-South Korea Relations Since the Korean War. Ethics of Development in a Global Environment.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Bolger, Daniel P. (1999). Unconventional warrior: General Charles H. Bonesteel III and the second Korean conflict 1966–69. Small Wars & Insurgencies.
  5. "USFK Combined Forces Command". www.usfk.mil. Retrieved 2018-01-17.
  6. Bolger, Daniel P. (1991). Scenes From an Unfinished War: Low Intensity Conflict in Korea, 1966 - 196. Leavenworth Papers Vol. 19.
  7. "U.S. Victory Lost in History". www.military.com. Retrieved 2018-01-17.
  8. Farley, Robert. "How the Soviet Union and China Almost Started World War III". The National Interest. Retrieved 2018-01-17.
  9. Varun, Gupta; Divyanshu, Verma; Kartik, Mital (2016). "South Korea - "The Miracle of Han River"" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-02-16. Retrieved 2018-01-17.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  10. "Wilson Center Digital Archive". digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org. Retrieved 2018-01-17.
  11. "'1965 Korea-Japan agreement should be re-estimated' : Korea.net : The official website of the Republic of Korea". Korean Culture and Information Service. Retrieved 2018-01-17.
  12. Dae-sook, Suh (1988). Kim Il Sung: The North Korean Leader (1st ed.). pp.  75–80 (1st Congress), 83–91 (2nd Congress), 145–148 (3rd Congress) & 169–173 (4th Congress). ISBN   0231065736.
  13. Enkel, Daljani. ""Information on the Korean Workers' Party," October, 1966". History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, AQPPSH, MPP Korese, D 10, V. 1966.
  14. "Lyndon B. Johnson: Joint Statement Following Discussions With President Park of Korea". www.presidency.ucsb.edu. Retrieved 2018-01-17.
  15. Sek, Manny. "The Quiet Victory: The US Army in the Korean Demilitarized Zone 1953-2004" (PDF). 4010916.
  16. 1 2 3 Miyoshi Jager, Sheila (June 2014). Brothers at War: The Unending Conflict in Korea 1st Edition. W W Norton & Company. ISBN   978-0-393-34885-9.
  17. "Security Conditions in South Korea," Office of National Estimates, Central Intelligence Agency, CIA-RDP79R00904A001300040013-2, CIA Records Search Tool (CREST), NARA, June 23, 1967.
  18. 1 2 "Weekly Summary," Central Intelligence Agency, CIA-RDP79-00927A006700070001-3, CIA Records Search Tool (CREST), NARA, Nov. 15, 1968.
  19. Onishi, Norimitsu (2004-02-15). "South Korean Movie Unlocks Door on a Once-Secret Past". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2018-01-17.
  20. Telegram No. 123157 from U.S. Embassy Seoul to State Department, March 2, 1968, RG 59, Central Foreign Policy Files, Box 2268, POL 33-6 KOR N-US.
  21. International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (11 February 2015). "The Military Balance 2015". Routledge: 264–267. doi:10.1080/04597222.2015.996334.
  22. Kim, Byung-kook; F. Vogel, Ezra (April 2011). A Review of "The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea. Harvard University: Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN   9780674058200.
  23. 1 2 풀뿌리, 이름없는 (30 September 2015). "제2의 62 5전쟁( 2)울진삼척토벌 상세보고서". Daum .net. Archived from the original on 22 September 2018. Retrieved 17 January 2018.
  24. Lee, Tae-hoon (7 February 2011). "S. Korea raided North with captured agents in 1967". The Korea Times.
  25. Mitchell Lerner (December 2010). "Mostly Propaganda in Nature:" Kim Il Sung, the Juche Ideology, and the Second Korean War" (PDF). The North Korea International Documentation Project. Retrieved 3 May 2012.
  26. Rawnsley, Adam (2 June 2016). "South Korea's Covert Operations in North Korea". A Medium Corporation.
  27. "울진 - 삼척무장곰비 침투사건". Naver. 7 March 2012.
  28. Lee, Hang soo (28 October 2004). "Report of Ghastly 1968 Murder of Boy by N. Koreans Was True". The Chosun llbo.
  29. 1 2 Friedman, Herbert A. (8 May 2013). "The Cold War in Korea - Operation Jilli". Psywarrior.
  30. "Principle Developments in World Communist Affairs (Jan. 23-Feb. 20, 1969)," CIA-RDP78-03061A000400020003-4 CIA Records Search Tool (CREST), NARA, Jan. 4, 1969.
  31. Helms, Richard (21 September 1967). "North Korean Intentions and Capabilities With Respect to South Korea (PDF) (Report). CIA. 21 September 1967. p. 7,11. SNIE 14.2-67. Retrieved 13 March 2017" (PDF). CIA. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 24, 2017.
  32. Transcript of press interview with Kim Sin-cho, Jan. 26, 1968, RG 59, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Office of the Country Director for Korea, Subject Files 1966-1974, Box 2, POL 1968 Blue House Raid, NARA.
  33. Pike, John (20 March 2016). "North Korean Purges - Kim Il-sung". GlobalSecurity.org.
  34. Joseph S. Bermudez, Jr., "DPRK Intelligence Services 1967-1971, Part 2," KPA Journal, Vol. 1, No. 5., May 2010. [Online]
  35. "Confrontation in Korea," SNIE 14.2-69, Central Intelligence Agency, 0001218149, CIA Records Search Tool (CREST), NARA, Jan. 30, 1969. [Online]
  36. Lavelle, Moira (August 20, 2015). "A Brief History of Border Conflict between North and South Korea." Public Radio International". PRI.
  37. Carter J, Eckert (November 2016). Park Chung Hee and Modern Korea: The Roots of Militarism. Belknap Press. p. 60. ISBN   9780674659865.
Ulchin-Samcheok Landings