Yasui v. United States

Last updated

Yasui v. United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued May 10–11, 1943
Decided June 21, 1943
Full case nameMinoru Yasui v. United States
Citations320 U.S. 115 ( more )
63 S. Ct. 1392, 87 L. Ed. 1793, 1943 U.S. LEXIS 461
Case history
PriorU.S. v. Minoru Yasui, 48 F. Supp. 40 (D. Or. 1942)
Certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
SubsequentUnited States v. Minoru Yasui, 51 F. Supp. 234 (D. Or. 1943)
Holding
The Court held that the application of curfews against citizens was constitutional.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Harlan F. Stone
Associate Justices
Owen Roberts  · Hugo Black
Stanley F. Reed  · Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas  · Frank Murphy
Robert H. Jackson  · Wiley B. Rutledge
Case opinion
MajorityStone, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
18 U.S.C.A. s 97a
Executive Order 9066
U.S. Const.

Yasui v. United States, 320 U.S. 115 (1943), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the constitutionality of curfews used during World War II when they were applied to citizens of the United States. [1] The case arose out of the implementation of Executive Order 9066 by the U.S. military to create zones of exclusion along the West Coast of the United States, where Japanese Americans were subjected to curfews and eventual removal to relocation centers. This Presidential order followed the attack on Pearl Harbor that brought America into World War II and inflamed the existing anti-Japanese sentiment in the country.

Contents

In their decision, the Supreme Court held that the application of curfews against citizens is constitutional. As a companion case to Hirabayashi v. United States , both decided on June 21, 1943, the court affirmed the conviction of U.S.-born Minoru Yasui. The court remanded the case to the district court for sentencing as the lower court had determined the curfew was not valid against citizens, but Yasui had forfeited his citizenship by working for the Japanese consulate. The Yasui and Hirabayashi decisions, along with the later Ex parte Endo and Korematsu v. United States decisions, determined the legality of the curfews and relocations during the war. In the 1980s, new information was used to vacate the conviction of Yasui.

Background

On September 1, 1939, Nazi Germany invaded neighboring Poland, starting World War II. After two years of combat neutrality, the United States was drawn into the war as an active participant after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt responded to fears of a fifth column composed of Japanese-Americans by issuing Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942. [2] This executive order authorized the military to create zones of exclusion, which were then used to relocate predominantly those of Japanese heritage from the West Coast to internment camps inland. On March 23, 1942, General John L. DeWitt, commander of the Western Defense Command, set restrictions on aliens and Japanese-Americans including a curfew from 8:00 pm to 6:00 am. [3] [4]

Minoru Yasui was born in 1916 in Hood River, Oregon, where he graduated from high school in 1933. [5] He then graduated from the University of Oregon in 1937, and that college’s law school in 1939. [5] Yasui, U.S. Army reservist, [6] then began working at the Japanese Consulate in Chicago, Illinois, in 1940, remaining there until December 8, 1941, when he then resigned and returned to Hood River. [5] On March 28, 1942, he deliberately broke the military implemented curfew in Portland, Oregon, by walking around the downtown area and then presenting himself at a police station after 11:00 pm in order to test the curfew’s constitutionality. [4] [7]

On June 12, 1942, Judge James Alger Fee of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon began presiding over the non-jury trial of Yasui, the first case challenging the curfew to make it to court. [7] The trial was held at the Federal Courthouse in Portland. [8] Fee determined in his ruling issued on November 16, 1942, that the curfew could only apply to aliens, as martial law had not been imposed by the government. [8] [9] However, he also ruled that because Yasui had worked for the Japanese government he had forfeited his citizenship, so that the curfew did apply to him. [6] [7] [9] Fee sentenced Yasui to one year in jail, which was served at the Multnomah County Jail, and $5,000 fine. [10] This federal court decision with constitutional and war power issues made news around the country. [11]

Yasui then appealed his conviction to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [10] After arguments in the case were filed, the court certified two question to the Supreme Court of the United States. [10] The Supreme Court then ordered the entire case be decided by that court, removing the case from further consideration by the Ninth Circuit. [10]

Decision

Poster of exclusion orders regarding Japanese-Americans Instructions to japanese.png
Poster of exclusion orders regarding Japanese-Americans
Old federal courthouse in Portland, Oregon Federal courthouse OR-Portland 1933.jpg
Old federal courthouse in Portland, Oregon

The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case on May 10 and May 11, 1943, with Charles Fahy arguing the case for the United States as Solicitor General . [1] Min’s defense team included E. F. Bernard from Portland and A. L. Wirin from Los Angeles. [1] On June 21, 1943, the court issued its decision in the case along with the Hirabayashi v. United States case. [1]

Citing Hirabayashi, Chief Justice Stone wrote the opinion of the court, and determined that the curfew and exclusion orders were valid, even as applied to citizens of the United States. [1] Stone’s opinion was three pages and did not contain any concurring opinions or dissents, while the Hirabayashi decision had thirty-four pages and two concurring opinions. [1] In Yasui the court affirmed his conviction of the misdemeanor, but ordered re-sentencing since the lower court had determined that the curfew was not valid, and that Yasui had forfeited his citizenship. [1] The Supreme Court remanded (returned) the case back to the district court to determine a sentence in light of these circumstances. [1] [7] [12]

Aftermath

Once the case returned to Judge Fee, he revised his earlier opinion to strike out the ruling that Yasui was no longer a United States citizen. [12] Fee also removed the fine and reduced the sentence to 15 days, with the time already served. [13] Yasui was released and moved into the Japanese internment camps. [14]

Korematsu v. United States was decided the next year and overshadowed both the Yasui and Hirabayashi cases. The decisions were questioned by legal scholars even before the war had ended. [15] Criticism has included the racist aspects of the cases and the later discovery that officials in the United States Department of Justice lied to the court at the time of the trial. [16]

On February 1, 1983, Yasui petitioned the Oregon federal district court for a writ of error coram nobis due to the discovery of the falsehoods promulgated by the Department of Justice. [13] [17] This writ is only available to people who have already completed their imprisonment, and can only be used to challenge factual errors from the case. [17] Yasui claimed in his writ that the government withheld evidence at the original trial concerning the threat of a Japanese attack on the United States mainland. [13] The court dismissed the original indictment and conviction against Yasui, as well as the petition for the writ on request by the government. [13] Yasui, then appealed the decision to dismiss the petition, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal on procedural grounds. [13] However, the Ninth Circuit ultimately did vacate Hirabayashi's conviction, thereby impliedly vindicating Yasui as well. In 2011, the U.S. Solicitor General's office publicly confessed the Justice Department's 1943 ethical lapse in the Supreme Court. [18] Minoru Yasui died on November 12, 1986. [5]

Lawyers who represented Fred Korematsu, Gordon Hirabayashi, and Minoru Yasui in successful efforts in lower federal courts to nullify their convictions for violating military curfew and exclusion orders sent a letter dated January 13, 2014 to Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. [19] In light of the appeal proceedings before the U.S. Supreme in Hedges v. Obama , the lawyers asked Verrili to request the Supreme Court overrule its decisions in Korematsu (1943), Hirabayashi (1943) and Yasui (1943). If the Solicitor General should not make the request, the lawyers asked that the federal government to make clear the federal government "does not consider the internment decisions as valid precedent for governmental or military detention of individuals or groups without due process of law [...]." [20]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internment of Japanese Americans</span> World War II mass incarceration in the United States

During World War II, the United States forcibly relocated and incarcerated at least 125,284 people of Japanese descent in 75 identified incarceration sites. Most lived on the Pacific Coast, in concentration camps in the western interior of the country. Approximately two-thirds of the inmates were United States citizens. These actions were initiated by President Franklin D. Roosevelt via Executive Order 9066 following Imperial Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor.

Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that upheld the internment of Japanese Americans from the West Coast Military Area during World War II. The decision has been widely criticized, with some scholars describing it as "an odious and discredited artifact of popular bigotry", and as "a stain on American jurisprudence". The case is often cited as one of the worst Supreme Court decisions of all time. Chief Justice John Roberts repudiated the Korematsu decision in his majority opinion in the 2018 case of Trump v. Hawaii.

Ex parte Mitsuye Endo, 323 U.S. 283 (1944), was a United States Supreme Court ex parte decision handed down on December 18, 1944, in which the Justices unanimously ruled that the U.S. government could not continue to detain a citizen who was "concededly loyal" to the United States. Although the Court did not touch on the constitutionality of the exclusion of people of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast, which it had found not to violate citizen rights in its Korematsu v. United States decision on the same date, the Endo ruling nonetheless led to the reopening of the West Coast to Japanese Americans after their incarceration in camps across the U.S. interior during World War II.

A writ of coram nobis is a legal order allowing a court to correct its original judgment upon discovery of a fundamental error that did not appear in the records of the original judgment's proceedings and that would have prevented the judgment from being pronounced. The term coram nobis is Latin for "before us" and the meaning of its full form, quae coram nobis resident, is "which [things] remain in our presence". The writ of coram nobis originated in the courts of common law in the English legal system during the sixteenth century.

Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), was the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but is administered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fred Korematsu</span> Japanese-American civil rights activist (1919–2005)

Fred Toyosaburo Korematsu was an American civil rights activist who resisted the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. Shortly after the Imperial Japanese Navy launched its attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, which authorized the removal of individuals of Japanese ancestry living on the West Coast from their homes and their mandatory imprisonment in incarceration camps, but Korematsu instead challenged the orders and became a fugitive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gordon Hirabayashi</span> American sociologist (1918–2012)

Gordon Kiyoshi Hirabayashi was an American sociologist, best known for his principled resistance to the Japanese American internment during World War II, and the court case which bears his name, Hirabayashi v. United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kermit Roosevelt III</span> American writer and lawyer

Kermit Roosevelt III is an American author, lawyer, and legal scholar. He is a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania. He is a great-great-grandson of United States President Theodore Roosevelt and a distant cousin of President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the application of curfews against members of a minority group were constitutional when the nation was at war with the country from which that group's ancestors originated. The case arose out of the issuance of Executive Order 9066 following the attack on Pearl Harbor and the U.S. entry into World War II. President Franklin D. Roosevelt had authorized military commanders to secure areas from which "any or all persons may be excluded", and Japanese Americans living in the West Coast were subject to a curfew and other restrictions before being removed to internment camps. The plaintiff, Gordon Hirabayashi, was convicted of violating the curfew and had appealed to the Supreme Court. Yasui v. United States was a companion case decided the same day. Both convictions were overturned in coram nobis proceedings in the 1980s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John L. DeWitt</span> United States Army general (1890–1962)

John Lesesne DeWitt was a three-star general in the United States Army, best known for overseeing the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.

On February 19, 1942, shortly after Japan's surprise attack on Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 authorizing the forced removal of over 110,000 Japanese Americans from the West Coast and into internment camps for the duration of the war. The personal rights, liberties, and freedoms of Japanese Americans were suspended by the United States government. In the "relocation centers", internees were housed in tar-papered army-style barracks. Some individuals who protested their treatment were sent to a special camp at Tule Lake, California.

The following article focuses on the movement to obtain redress for the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, and significant court cases that have shaped civil and human rights for Japanese Americans and other minorities. These cases have been the cause and/or catalyst to many changes in United States law. But mainly, they have resulted in adjusting the perception of Asian immigrants in the eyes of the American government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minoru Yasui</span> American lawyer and activist (1916–1986)

Minoru Yasui was an American lawyer from Oregon. Born in Hood River, Oregon, he earned both an undergraduate degree and his law degree at the University of Oregon. He was one of the few Japanese Americans after the bombing of Pearl Harbor who fought laws that directly targeted Japanese Americans or Japanese immigrants. His case was the first case to test the constitutionality of the curfews targeted at minority groups.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Fahy</span> American judge (1892–1979)

Charles Fahy was an American lawyer and judge who served as the 26th Solicitor General of the United States from 1941 to 1945 and later served as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 1949 until his death in 1979.

James Alger Fee was a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and previously was a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. A veteran of the United States Army, his first judicial position was with the Oregon Circuit Court. While a federal judge he made national news for his decision during World War II regarding the application of the exclusion orders that had forced those of Japanese heritage from the West Coast.

Mitsuye "Maureen" Endo Tsutsumi was an American woman of Japanese descent who was placed in an internment camp during World War II. Endo filed a writ of habeas corpus that ultimately led to a United States Supreme Court ruling that the U.S. government could not continue to detain a citizen who was "concededly loyal" to the United States.

Aiko Herzig-Yoshinaga was a Japanese American political activist who played a major role in the Japanese American redress movement. She was the lead researcher of the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians (CWRIC), a bipartisan federal committee appointed by Congress in 1980 to review the causes and effects of the Japanese American incarceration during World War II. As a young woman, Herzig-Yoshinaga was confined in the Manzanar Concentration Camp in California, the Jerome War Relocation Center in Arkansas, and the Rohwer War Relocation Center, which is also in Arkansas. She later uncovered government documents that debunked the wartime administration's claims of "military necessity" and helped compile the CWRIC's final report, Personal Justice Denied, which led to the issuance of a formal apology and reparations for former camp inmates. She also contributed pivotal evidence and testimony to the Hirabayashi, Korematsu and Yasui coram nobis cases.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stone Court</span> Period of the US Supreme Court from 1941 to 1946

The Stone Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States from 1941 to 1946, when Harlan F. Stone served as Chief Justice of the United States. Stone succeeded the retiring Charles Evans Hughes in 1941, and served as Chief Justice until his death, at which point Fred Vinson was nominated and confirmed as Stone's replacement. He was the fourth chief justice to have previously served as an associate justice and the second to have done so without a break in tenure. Presiding over the country during World War II, the Stone Court delivered several important war-time rulings, such as in Ex parte Quirin, where it upheld the President's power to try Nazi saboteurs captured on American soil by military tribunals. It also supported the federal government's policy of relocating Japanese Americans into internment camps.

<i>Hirabayashi v. United States</i> (1987)

Hirabayashi v. United States, 828 F.2d 591, is a case decided by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and recognized for both its historical and legal significance. The case is historically significant for vacating the World War II–era convictions of Japanese American civil rights leader Gordon Hirabayashi. Those convictions were affirmed in the Supreme Court's 1943 decision Hirabayashi v. United States. The case is legally significant for establishing the standard to determine when any federal court in the Ninth Circuit may issue a writ of coram nobis.

Frank Fujio Chuman is a Japanese-American former civil rights attorney and author, involved in several important Japanese American civil rights cases and in the redress movement.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Yasui v. United States, 320 U.S. 115 (1943).
  2. ↑ "Transcript of Executive Order 9066: Resulting in the Relocation of Japanese (1942)". Our Documents. Archived from the original on May 20, 2011. Retrieved November 19, 2007.
  3. ↑ "New Curfew for Japanese Starts Friday". Oakland Tribune. March 24, 1942. p. 1.
  4. 1 2 "Chronology of World War II Incarceration". Japanese American National Museum. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. Retrieved November 19, 2007.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "Japanese American Internment Curriculum: Minoru Yasui". San Francisco State University. Archived from the original on November 26, 2007. Retrieved November 19, 2007.
  6. 1 2 Daniels, Roger (2004). "The Japanese American Cases, 1942-2004: A Social History". Law & Contemporary Problems. 68: 159. Archived from the original on July 12, 2007. Retrieved November 19, 2007.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Irons, Peter H. (1983). Justice At War . New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN   0-19-503273-X.
  8. 1 2 Tateishi, John (1984). And Justice for all: An Oral History of the Japanese American Detention Camps . New York: Random House. pp.  78–80. ISBN   0-394-53982-6.
  9. 1 2 United States v. Yasui, 48F. Supp.40 , 44(D. Or.1942).
  10. 1 2 3 4 Yasui v. U.S., 1943 WL 54783, Supreme Court of the United States. Appellate Brief, April 30, 1943.
  11. ↑ "Medal for Moving". Time . November 30, 1942. Archived from the original on October 14, 2010. Retrieved November 19, 2007.
  12. 1 2 United States v. Minoru Yasui Archived 2007-11-26 at the Wayback Machine , 51 F. Supp. 234, D. Ore (1943)
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 Yasui v. United States, 772 F.2d 1496 (C.A. 9)
  14. ↑ Kessler, Lauren (2006). Stubborn Twig. Seattle: Oregon Historical Society Press. pp. 171–197. ISBN   0-87595-296-8.
  15. ↑ Rostow, Eugene V. (1945). "The Japanese American Cases—A Disaster". Yale Law Journal . The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 54, No. 3. 54 (3): 489–533. doi:10.2307/792783. JSTOR   792783. Archived from the original on January 26, 2020. Retrieved February 3, 2021.
  16. ↑ Russell, Margaret M. (2003). "Cleansing Moments and Retrospective Justice". Michigan Law Review . Michigan Law Review, Vol. 101, No. 5. 101 (5): 1225–1268 [p. 1249]. doi:10.2307/3595375. JSTOR   3595375. Archived from the original on August 24, 2020. Retrieved February 3, 2021.
  17. 1 2 Kim, Hyung-chan (1992). Asian Americans and the Supreme Court: A Documentary History. Documentary reference collections. New York: Greenwood Press. pp.  778. ISBN   0-313-27234-4.
  18. ↑ Savage, David G. (May 24, 2011), "U.S. official cites misconduct in Japanese American internment cases", The Los Angeles Times , archived from the original on June 9, 2011, retrieved February 3, 2021
  19. ↑ Dale Minami, Lorraine Bannai, Donald Tomaki, Peter Irons, Eric Yamamoto, Leigh Ann Miyasato, Pegy Nagae, Rod Kawakami, Karen Kai, Kathryn A. Bannai and Robert Rusky (January 13, 2014). "Re: Hedges v. Obama Supreme Court of the United States Docket No. 17- 758" (PDF). SCOUSblog. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 29, 2014. Retrieved April 29, 2014.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. ↑ Denniston, Lyle (January 16, 2014). "A plea to cast aside Korematsu". SCOTUSblog. Archived from the original on March 13, 2014. Retrieved April 29, 2014.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.