Caproni Ca.90

Last updated
Caproni Ca 90
Bundesarchiv Bild 102-09373, Mailand, Italienisches Grossflugzeug.jpg
Role Heavy bomber
National originItaly
Manufacturer Caproni
First flight13 October 1929 [1]
Number built1

The Caproni Ca.90 was a prototype heavy bomber designed and built by the Italian aircraft manufacturer Caproni. At the time of its maiden flight on 13 October 1929, it was the largest land-based aircraft then extant in the world; the First World War-era Siemens-Schuckert R.VIII having been slightly larger. Only the one Ca.90 was ever built. [2] [1]

Contents

Although the Dornier Do X flying boat that flew later that same year had a larger wingspan and weight, the Ca.90 remained the largest landplane until the arrival of the Tupolev ANT-20 in 1934. [2]

Design and development

The Caproni Ca.90 was a six-engined inverted sesquiplane designed for use as a heavy bomber. [2] In terms of its construction, the Ca.90 was primarily composed of steel tubing, which possessed greater strength and elasticity than either aluminium or duralumin, while the main joints were machined from billets of chrome-nickel steel. [1] The majority of the fuselage and the wings were covered with a simplistic doped fabric; however, the forward portion had corrugated duralumin sheeting instead. Extensive testing of all elements of the aircraft was carried out at the experimental department of the Polytechnic University of Milan. [3]

The aircraft had a large square-section fuselage that was suspended from the lower wing as well as forming a portion of its central section. [4] The bow was outfitted with a turret that was armed with a machine gun; directly behind the turret was a sizable fuel tank, above which was the flight deck from where the pilot flew the aircraft. Aft of this compartment were several more fuel tanks and the bomb bay.. [5] The bombracks were capable of carrying various sizes (800 kg, 500 kg, 250 kg, and 100 kg) of bombs for a total of 8,000 kg of explosives over a normal mission range. Towards the rear of the fuselage were additional defensive positions which were intended to provide heavy fire across all directions, a total of seven machine guns were normally equipped. [5]

The Ca.90 was powered by an arrangement of six Isotta Fraschini Asso 1000 water-cooled W-18 piston engines. [6] Specifically, it two tandem pairs of engines mounted above the lower wing, each pair driving a four-bladed pusher and a two-bladed tractor propeller, [2] while the final pair of engines was mounted above the fuselage. [2] The Asso 1000 engines were amongst the powerful available at that time; despite their cutting edge nature, they possessed a relatively frugal rate of fuel consumption and along with moderate power-to-weight ratio. [4] Cooling was provided by water-based radiators, the pilot was able to control the air scoops for which in order to regulate them. Copious amounts of fuel were stored in both the wings and fuselage. [7] Caproni stated that an excessive number of engines undermines both the simplicity and safety of aircraft by increasing control difficulties. Amid the flight test programme, it was speculated that the future development of large engines capable of generating up to 2,000 hp would permit the number of engines fitted to the Ca.90 to be reduced to as few as three. [8]

The wings of the Ca.90 were particularly large for the era. [6] A monoplane tail unit was used, which was fitted with balanced control surfaces. The rudder's balanced surface also performed mid-flight corrections for the vertical fin. [4] The aircraft was outfitted with a relatively wide-track undercarriage, which facilitated movements across rough terrain. [4] It comprised two independent pairs of large wheels mounted on ball bearings and furnished with oleo-rubber type springs. A tail wheel was also present, being fitted underneath the rear terminal member of the fuselage. [5]

It was hailed as a technological triumph of the era, having demonstrated, among other things, that landplanes could reach such large dimensions without necessarily increasing the difficulty of taking off or landing. [1] In fact, the controllability of the Ca.90 did not substantially differ from that of smaller aircraft despite its exceptional size and weight; during its trials, the aircraft was regularly being piloted by a single person. [8] This outcome can be at least in part attributed to a series of careful studies conducted as well as the adoption of special balancing surfaces across the various flight controls to permit the pilot to operate the aircraft without incurring undue levels of fatigue. Furthermore, all of the instrumentation and various controls, such as of the engines, had been intentionally organised for the pilot's ease of use. [8] The flight controls were typically actuated using steel cables. The flight deck was outfitted with dual flying controls and various other provisions for a second pilot. [7]

The Ca.90 demonstrated that large land-based aircraft could possess considerable advantages over a comparably sized flying boat, particular in terms of its weight; while the flying boat necessitated the use of a complex and heavy hull to withstand rough seas and the considerable stresses involved in its interactions with water, landplanes could be built with a comparatively simpler and lighter fuselage, their lowered weight translated into a larger useful payload capacity for the same engine power. [1] Land-based operations would also be less troubled by certain weather phenomenon; flying boat operations were frequently postponed due to rough seas. Despite these conclusions, it was also speculated that relatively few modifications to the fuselage would be needed to form a sturdy water-tight hull, and thus permit the Ca.90 to alight on either land or water. [9]

In the bomber role, the Ca.90 had an effective radius of action of 2,000 km (1243 ml.) while carrying 8,000 kg (17,600 lb.) of bombs. [10] Furthermore, it was promoted as being ready to repel attacks by hostile pursuit aircraft, its structure being fairly tolerant to battle damage, and capable of attacking distant targets without an escort. Furthermore, it was suggested that the aircraft could be readily adapted for other purposes, including the carriage of passengers, air mail, and freight within its large fuselage; as an airliner, it would be capable of lengthy nonstop flights, event potentially flying Transatlantic routes, albeit with a reduced payload capacity in order to carry more fuel to do so. [10] The scale of the Ca.90 was such that the aircraft became a matter of national prestige for Italy's aeronautical industry as well as the wider Italian nation and Caproni. [1]

Specifications

Caproni Ca.90 3-view.svg

Data from Illustrated Encyclopedia of Aircraft , [2] National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics [11]

General characteristics

Performance

Armament

Appearances in media

The Ca.90 appeared in animated form, within the Studio Ghibli film, Kaze Tachinu . It makes its appearance in a dream sequence where Jiro Horikoshi has a meaningful meeting and conversation with his inspiration, Count Caproni.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caproni Ca.135</span> Type of aircraft

The Caproni Ca.135 was an Italian medium bomber designed in Bergamo in Italy by Cesare Pallavicino. It flew for the first time in 1935, and entered service with the Peruvian Air Force in 1937, and with the Regia Aeronautica in January 1938.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caproni Ca.165</span> Italian biplane fighter prototype

The Caproni Ca.165 was an Italian biplane fighter developed just before World War II, but produced only as a prototype, as the competing Fiat CR.42 Falco was selected for series production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ambrosini SS.4</span> Italian fighter prototype

The SAI-Ambrosini SS.4 was an Italian fighter prototype developed in the late 1930s, featuring a canard-style wing layout and a pusher propeller. Development of the SS.4 was abandoned after the prototype crashed on its second flight.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caproni Ca.100</span> Type of aircraft

The Caproni Ca.100 was the standard trainer aircraft of the Regia Aeronautica in the 1930s. Large numbers of this tandem, two-seat, biplane were built, powered by different engines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caproni Ca.111</span> Type of aircraft

The Caproni Ca.111 was a long-range reconnaissance aircraft and light bomber produced in Italy during the 1930s. It was a derivative of the Ca.101.

The Piaggio P.32 was an Italian medium bomber of the late 1930s, produced by Piaggio, and designed by Giovanni Pegna. It was a modern design for its time, but was a failure due to lack of powerplants commensurate with its high wing loading.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caproni Ca.73</span> Type of aircraft

The Caproni Ca.73 was an inverted sesquiplane aircraft designed produced by the Italian aircraft manufacturer Caproni.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stipa-Caproni</span> Experimental aircraft

The Stipa-Caproni, also known as the Caproni Stipa, was an experimental Italian aircraft designed in 1932 by Luigi Stipa (1900–1992) and built by Caproni. It featured a hollow, barrel-shaped fuselage with the engine and propeller completely enclosed by the fuselage—in essence, the whole fuselage was a single ducted fan. Although the Regia Aeronautica was not interested in pursuing development of the Stipa-Caproni, its design influenced the development of jet propulsion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caproni Ca.355</span> Italian WWII dive bomber

The Caproni Ca.355 Tuffo was a low-wing single-engine dive bomber, designed and built by the Italian Caproni company in 1941, which never proceeded beyond a single prototype. Derived from Ca.335 Mistral, the Ca.355 was proposed to equip the Regia Aeronautica, but it was found to offer little advantage over the German Junkers Ju 87 "Stuka" and the project was abandoned.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caproni Vizzola F.4</span> Type of aircraft

The Caproni Vizzola F.4 was an Italian fighter aircraft prototype that was designed in 1937 and built from 1939. It was a single-seat, low-wing cantilever monoplane with retractable landing gear.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Isotta Fraschini Asso XI</span>

The Asso XI was a family of water-cooled, supercharged V12 piston aeroengines produced in the 1930s by Italian manufacturer Isotta Fraschini, and fitted on a number of aircraft types built by CANT, Caproni and others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caproni Ca.95</span> Type of aircraft

The Caproni Ca.95 was a large, three engine, long range, heavy bomber prototype built in Italy in 1929. It could carry a 1,600 kg (3,500 lb) bomb load and had three defensive gun positions. Only one was built.

The Caproni Ca.61 was an Italian heavy day bomber aircraft of 1922. It was the final development of the Caproni three engine, twin boom biplane types developed during World War I, but it was not put into production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caproni Ca.87</span> 1920s Italian flying boat

The Caproni Ca.87 was an Italian long-distance aircraft built in the 1920s for a planned transatlantic flight.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caproni Ca.134</span> 1930s Italian reconnaissance aircraft

The Caproni Ca.134 was a biplane reconnaissance aircraft built by the Italian company Caproni in the 1930s.

The Caproni Ca.91 was a proposed Italian flying boat designed by Caproni.

The Caproni Ca.66 and Caproni Ca.67 were Italian night bomber aircraft designed to re-equip the post-World War I Regia Aeronautica.

The Caproni Ca.79 was an Italian light bomber produced in the mid-1920s.

The Caproni Ca.120 was a three-engine monoplane bomber built by Caproni in the 1930s.

The Caproni Ca.146 was a high-wing reconnaissance aircraft built by Caproni in the mid-1930s.

References

Citations

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 NACA 1930, p. 1.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Orbis 1985, p. 1054.
  3. NACA 1930, pp. 1-2.
  4. 1 2 3 4 NACA 1930, p. 4.
  5. 1 2 3 NACA 1930, pp. 4-5.
  6. 1 2 NACA 1930, p. 2.
  7. 1 2 NACA 1930, p. 5.
  8. 1 2 3 NACA 1930, pp. 2-3.
  9. NACA 1930, pp. 3-4.
  10. 1 2 NACA 1930, p. 3.
  11. NACA 1930, pp. 5-9.

Bibliography