Capturing the Friedmans

Last updated

Capturing the Friedmans
Capturing the Friedmans poster.jpg
Theatrical release poster
Directed by Andrew Jarecki
Produced byAndrew Jarecki
Marc Smerling
StarringArnold Friedman
Elaine Friedman
David Friedman
Jesse Friedman
Cinematography Adolfo Doring
Edited byRichard Hankin
Music by Andrea Morricone
Bill Harrington
Production
companies
Distributed by Magnolia Pictures
Release dates
  • January 17, 2003 (2003-01-17)(Sundance)
  • May 30, 2003 (2003-05-30)(United States)
Running time
107 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish

Capturing the Friedmans is a 2003 HBO documentary film directed by Andrew Jarecki. It focuses on the 1980s investigation of Arnold and Jesse Friedman for child molestation. The film premiered at the 2003 Sundance Film Festival where it received critical acclaim as well as the Grand Jury Prize: Documentary. The film went on to be nominated for the Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature. [1]

Contents

Production

Jarecki initially was making a short film, Just a Clown (which he later completed), about children's birthday party entertainers in New York City, including the popular clown David Friedman ("Silly Billy"). During his research, Jarecki learned that David Friedman's brother, Jesse, [2] and his father, Arnold, had pleaded guilty to child sexual abuse, and the family had an archive of home movies. Jarecki interviewed some of the children involved and ended up making a film focusing on the Friedmans. [3]

Synopsis

The investigation into Arnold Friedman's life started in 1984, when the U.S. Postal Service intercepted a magazine of child pornography sent to him from the Netherlands. In 1987, investigators searched his home in Great Neck, New York, and found a collection of child pornography. Upon learning that Arnold taught computer classes for preteen boys in his home, authorities interviewed the students, some of whom alleged they had been subjected to physical and sexual abuse at the hands of Arnold and his youngest son, Jesse, a young adult who assisted Arnold with the classes. The two men were arrested and accused of committing hundreds of crimes, throwing the community into turmoil. They were eventually able to get out on bail and returned home to prepare for court, hanging their hopes for acquittal on the lack of physical evidence against them and reports of the coercive tactics and leading questions that had been used to question the students.

Around this time, David, Arnold's eldest son, got a camcorder, and he recorded hours of home videos during this period. The videos were not made with the intention of showing them to the public, but the film incorporates some of this footage, which consists of family dinners, conversations, and arguments. While Arnold's three sons (Seth, the middle son, chose to not participate in the documentary) believed Arnold and Jesse were innocent, Elaine, Arnold's wife and the mother of the boys, was unsure of her husband's innocence, and she encouraged Arnold to confess, hoping that would somehow help Jesse's case. Arnold did plead guilty to multiple charges of sodomy and sexual abuse and was sentenced to prison. Jesse later also pled guilty; his charges were not reduced after his father's plea, but he said his father had molested him as a child to try to get a less severe sentence (Jesse has since stated that this was just a legal ploy.)

After their pleas, both Arnold and Jesse said that no abuse had taken place during the computer classes, but they thought, given the media coverage of the case and the climate in Great Neck at the time, they would have been convicted and given harsher sentences if they had gone to trial. However, in a document Arnold wrote while under house arrest after he was bailed out of jail, he did claim that, when he was 13, he sexually abused his younger brother, Howard, who was eight years old at the time (Howard is interviewed in the film and says he does not remember being abused by his brother), and admitted to, as an adult, molesting two boys who were not his students (Jesse's lawyer, Peter Panaro, who visited Arnold in a Wisconsin federal prison, is interviewed in the film and says Arnold admitted this to him as well). Jesse, in a statement subsequent to the film, said his father also told him and his brothers that he sexually abused Howard. [4]

Arnold Friedman died in prison in 1995 after taking an overdose of antidepressants, leaving a $250,000 life insurance benefit to Jesse. Jesse Friedman was released from New York's Clinton Correctional Facility in 2001 after serving 13 years of his sentence. As of 2013, he was running an online book-selling business. [5]

Reception

Critical response

Capturing the Friedmans won the Grand Jury Prize for Documentary at the 2003 Sundance Film Festival [6] and received predominantly positive reviews. On review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, it has an approval rating of 97% based on 153 reviews, with an average rating of 8.46/10; the website's critical consensus calls the film: "A haunting depiction of a disintegrating family, and a powerful argument on the elusiveness of truth". [7] The film was ranked as the 7th best-reviewed movie of 2003 on the website's best of the year list. [8] On Metacritic, it has a score of 90 out of 100, based on 39 critics, indicating "universal acclaim". [9] The low-budget documentary was a success with audiences as well, its $3 million theatrical gross making it a surprise hit. [10]

Elvis Mitchell of The New York Times wrote, "Mr. Jarecki so recognizes the archetypal figures in the Friedman home that he knows to push things any further through heavy-handed assessment would be redundant." He praised Jarecki for operating under the premise "that first impressions can't be trusted and that truth rests with each person telling the story." [11] The Washington Post columnist Desson Howe offered similar praise, writing, "It's testament to Jarecki's superbly wrought film that everyone seems to be, simultaneously, morally suspect and strikingly innocent as they relate their stories and assertions ... This is a film about the quagmire of mystery in every human soul." [12] Similarly, film critic Roger Ebert of The Chicago Sun-Times wrote, "The film is an instructive lesson about the elusiveness of facts, especially in a legal context. Sometimes guilt and innocence are discovered in court, but sometimes, we gather, only truths about the law are demonstrated." [6] The film was voted the fifth film in the 2005 Channel 4 programme The 50 Greatest Documentaries.

In one of the few negative reviews, Los Angeles Times writer Kenneth Turan wrote a critique of both the film and Jarecki, stating: "Jarecki's pose of impartiality gets especially troublesome for audiences when it enables him to evade responsibility for dealing with the complexities of his material." [13] Writing for The Village Voice , Debbie Nathan, who was hired by Jarecki as a consultant after having been interviewed for the film, said of Jarecki, "Polling viewers at Sundance in January, he was struck by how they were split over Arnold and Jesse's guilt. Since then, he's crafted a marketing strategy based on ambiguity, and during Q&As and interviews, he has studiously avoided taking a stand." [14]

In his review, Ebert recounted Jarecki's statement at the Sundance Film Festival that he did not know whether Arnold and Jesse Friedman were guilty of child molestation and roundly praised Jarecki for communicating this ambiguity. [6] Jarecki funded Jesse Friedman's appeal and in 2014 he renewed his defense saying, "At the time, Capturing the Friedmans was celebrated for its ambiguity, but if you look at the prosecution of this case, it was an unambiguous disaster... If the police and the DA hadn't bullied everyone, it never would have gotten to this place. I care a lot about this issue of child abuse, I take it very seriously. That's why I feel so strongly that when there are false claims about these kinds of crimes, they really undermine the entire system." [15] [16]

Criticism

Criticism intensified as Jarecki's choice not to pursue his firm belief in the Friedmans' innocence became publicly known.[ citation needed ] There was also a critical blacklash due to footage Jarecki left out on purpose.[ citation needed ] The film omitted a third defendant in the case, Ross Goldstein, a teenage neighbor who turned state's evidence and corroborated some of the children's accusations.[ citation needed ] Additionally, Jarecki omitted a tearful confession of guilt Jesse Friedman made from prison on Geraldo Rivera's talk show in 1989;[ citation needed ] during the interview, he also detailed how his father had molested him as a child.[ citation needed ] Some of the Friedmans' alleged victims and family members wrote to the Awards Committee, protesting the Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature nomination. [17]

Accolades

YearAssociationCategoryProjectResultRef.
2003 Academy Award Best Documentary Feature Andrew Jarecki, and Marc SmerlingNominated [18]
2003 Critics' Choice Movie Awards Best Documentary Capturing the FriedmansWon [19]
2003 Directors Guild of America Awards Outstanding Directing for a Documentary Andrew JareckiNominated [20]
2003 Los Angeles Film Critics Association Best Documentary Film Andrew JareckiNominated [21]
2003 National Board of Review Top Five Documentaries Capturing the FreidmansWon [22]
Freedom of Expression Award Andrew JareckiWon
2003 New York Film Critics Circle Best Non-Fiction Film Capturing the FreidmansWon [23]
2003 Sundance Film Festival Grand Jury Prize Andrew JareckiWon [24]

Additional materials

The 2003 DVD release of the film included a second DVD: "Capturing the Friedmans -- Outside the Frame". It included:

There was footage on the bonus disc of an altercation that occurred during a Q&A session following the film's screening at the Tribeca Film Festival, in which Frances Galasso, the retired head of the Nassau County Police's Sex Crimes Unit, argues with investigative journalist Debbie Nathan, as well as a speech by trial judge Abbey Boklan from the film's premiere in Great Neck.[ citation needed ] Both Galasso and Boklan claim the film excluded evidence that points to Jesse's guilt, such as his interview with Geraldo Rivera and the existence of Ross Goldstein, the third defendant, who served time in prison after pleading guilty to charges of child molestation and even named two additional co-conspirators, though they remained unindicted.[ citation needed ] (Goldstein is not named in the film, but it is said in one of the DVD extras that he declined to be interviewed.[ citation needed ] One of the unindicted co-conspirators claims in the same section that he and the fifth man were falsely accused by Goldstein.)[ citation needed ] During the Tribeca Q&A, Jesse's lawyer at the time of the case, Peter Panaro, said he advised Jesse not to appear on Rivera's talk show (Panaro was also present on the show), and even had Jesse sign an affidavit saying he was doing so against legal advice.[ citation needed ]

In August 2010, a federal appeals court upheld the conviction of Jesse Friedman on technical legal grounds, [25] but took the unusual step of urging prosecutors to reopen Friedman's case, saying that there was a "reasonable likelihood that Jesse Friedman was wrongfully convicted". [26] The decision cited "overzealousness" by law enforcement officials swept up in the hysteria over child molestation in the 1980s.[ citation needed ]

Following the appeals court ruling, the Nassau District Attorney's office began a three-year investigation led by District Attorney Kathleen M. Rice. On June 24, 2013, the report was released. In a 155-page report, [27] the district attorney's office concluded that none of four issues raised in a strongly-worded 2010 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was substantiated by the evidence. Instead, it concluded, "By any impartial analysis, the reinvestigation process prompted by Jesse Friedman, his advocates and the Second Circuit, has only increased confidence in the integrity of Jesse Friedman's guilty plea and adjudication as a sex offender." Jesse Friedman was regarded as a "narcissist" and a "psychopathic deviant" by a psychiatrist his attorney hired to conduct an evaluation. [28] Judge Boklan was said to have been subject to "selectively edited and misleading film portrayals in Capturing the Friedmans".[ citation needed ]

The work was guided and overseen by a four-member independent advisory panel, which included Barry Scheck, a founder of the Innocence Project, one of the country's leading advocates for overturning wrongful convictions, and a member of O. J. Simpson's defense team. [29] However, Scheck has subsequently complained that key documents were not available to the panel, [30] and urged the matter be reopened. [31]

Prior to the report's release, new details emerged, including letters and affidavits [32] from some of the alleged victims in which they recanted their accusations and implicated the police in coercing their statements. [5]

The Village Voice conducted an interview with Jesse Friedman, [33] who described himself as "freakishly optimistic", and also reported that Ross Goldstein, a childhood friend of his, had broken his 25 year silence [34] to explain he had been coerced into cooperating with the district attorney's office: "He told the review panel of how he'd been coerced into lying, how prosecutors coached him through details of the Friedmans' computer lab, which he'd never even seen, and how he was imprisoned for something he'd never done." [35]

On February 10, 2015, Jesse Friedman was back in state appellate court seeking to have Nassau County prosecutors turn over to him the remainder of their evidence against him. [36] That December, a state Appeals Court found that the prosecutors did not have to release the records. Because Friedman pled guilty and there was no trial, a spokesperson for the Nassau County District Attorney claimed the records of witnesses who did not testify are confidential, and the law does not mandate their disclosure. [37] However, on November 27, 2017, the NYS Court of Appeals reversed the lower court, [38] and overturned the DA's claim regarding "confidential witnesses", and ordered the lower court to oversee disclosure of Friedman case files to the defendant. [39]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">McMartin preschool trial</span> 1980s day care sexual abuse case

The McMartin preschool trial was a day care sexual abuse case in the 1980s, prosecuted by the Los Angeles District Attorney, Ira Reiner. Members of the McMartin family, who operated a preschool in Manhattan Beach, California, were charged with hundreds of acts of sexual abuse of children in their care. Accusations were made in 1983, with arrests and the pretrial investigation taking place from 1984 to 1987 and trials running from 1987 to 1990. The case lasted seven years but resulted in no convictions, and all charges were dropped in 1990. By the case's end, it had become the longest and most expensive series of criminal trials in American history. The case was part of day-care sex-abuse hysteria, a moral panic over alleged Satanic ritual abuse in the 1980s and early 1990s.

The Kern County child abuse cases started the day care sexual abuse hysteria of the 1980s in Kern County, California. The cases involved allegations of satanic ritual abuse by a sex ring against as many as 60 children who testified they had been abused. At least 36 people were convicted and most of them spent years in prison. Thirty-four convictions were overturned on appeal. The district attorney responsible for the convictions was Ed Jagels, who was sued by at least one of those whose conviction was overturned, and who remained in office until 2009. Two of the convicted individuals were unable to prove their innocence because they died in prison.

People v. Jackson was a 2005 criminal trial held in Santa Barbara County Superior Court in Santa Maria, California. The American pop singer Michael Jackson was charged with molesting Gavin Arvizo, who was 13 years old at the time of the alleged abuse, at his Neverland Ranch estate in Los Olivos, California.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Victor Salva</span> American film director

Victor Ronald Salva is an American filmmaker and convicted sex offender. The self-described protégé of Francis Ford Coppola, he has primarily worked in the horror genre, most notably as the writer-director of the commercially successful Jeepers Creepers (2001) and its sequels Jeepers Creepers 2 (2003) and Jeepers Creepers 3 (2017). Outside of horror, Salva wrote and directed the fantasy-drama film Powder (1995). Salva's filmmaking career has been controversial due to his 1988 conviction for sexually abusing a 12-year-old actor who starred in his feature film debut Clownhouse (1989) and videotaping the encounter, along with possessing child pornography, having been publicised in 2006. This has led to protests against his films, including a boycott of Powder organized by his victim.

Andrew Jarecki is an American filmmaker, musician, and entrepreneur. He is best known for the Emmy-winning 2015 documentary series The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst. He is also known for the documentary film Capturing the Friedmans, which won eighteen international prizes including the Grand Jury Prize at the Sundance Film Festival and the New York Film Critics Circle award, and was nominated for an Academy Award. He also co-founded Moviefone and created the KnowMe iOS platform.

Robert Lindsay Hughes also billed variously as Bob Hughes and Robert Hughs, is an Australian-born British former actor who appeared in ABBA: The Movie and the television sitcom Hey Dad..!.

Various individuals, courts and the media around the world have raised concerns about the manner in which cases of child sexual abuse are handled when they occur in congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses. An independent 2009 study in Norway was critical of how Jehovah's Witnesses dealt with cases of child sexual abuse but stated there is no indication that the rate of sexual abuse among Jehovah's Witnesses is higher than found in general society. The organization's stated position is that it abhors child sexual abuse.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kathleen Rice</span> American politician and lawyer

Kathleen Maura Rice is an American lawyer and politician who served as the United States representative for New York's 4th congressional district from 2015 to 2023. She is a member of the Democratic Party. Before serving in Congress, Rice served as the Nassau County district attorney, and, before that, she served as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney's Office in Philadelphia and as an assistant district attorney in the Kings County District Attorney's Office in New York City.

Day-care sex-abuse hysteria was a moral panic that occurred primarily during the 1980s and early 1990s, and featured charges against day-care providers accused of committing several forms of child abuse, including Satanic ritual abuse. The collective cases are often considered a part of the Satanic panic. A 1982 case in Kern County, California, United States, first publicized the issue of day-care sexual abuse, and the issue figured prominently in news coverage for almost a decade. The Kern County case was followed by cases elsewhere in the United States, as well as Canada, New Zealand, Brazil, and various European countries.

A false allegation of child sexual abuse is an accusation against one or more individuals claiming that they committed child sexual abuse when no abuse has been committed by the accused. Such accusations can be brought by the alleged victim, or by another person on the alleged victim’s behalf. Studies on the rate of recorded child abuse allegations in the 1990s suggested that the overall rate of false accusations at that time was approximately 10%.

The San Diego Church ritual abuse case was a case of a developmentally disabled individual charged with child sexual abuse in 1991 as part of the satanic ritual abuse moral panic. After a 9-month trial, the accused was found not guilty by the jury.

The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, known as SNAP, established in 1989, is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization support group of survivors of clergy sexual abuse and their supporters in the United States. Barbara Blaine, a survivor of sex abuse by a priest, was the founding president. SNAP, which initially focused on the Roman Catholic Church, had 12,000 members in 56 countries as of 2012. It has branches for religious groups, such as SNAP Baptist, SNAP Orthodox, and SNAP Presbyterian, for non-religious groups, and for geographic regions, e.g., SNAP Australia and SNAP Germany.

American pop musician Michael Jackson faced allegations of child sexual abuse in 1993 and 2003. Additional claims emerged posthumously.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Josh Duggar</span> American TV personality and sex offender (born 1988)

Joshua James Duggar is an American convicted sex offender and former reality television personality. The eldest of Michelle and Jim Bob Duggar's nineteen children, Duggar and his family gained fame as the focus of the TLC series 19 Kids and Counting, spun off from a series of television specials. Duggar served as the executive director of FRC Action, a lobbying political action committee sponsored by the Family Research Council, from June 2013 to May 2015. He resigned from the position after he was reported to have molested multiple underage girls, including four of his siblings, when he was aged between 12 and 16.

The Archdiocese of Boston sex abuse scandal was part of a series of Catholic Church sexual abuse cases in the United States that revealed widespread crimes in the American Catholic Church. In early 2002, TheBoston Globe published results of an investigation that led to the criminal prosecutions of five Roman Catholic priests and thrust the sexual abuse of minors by Catholic clergy into the national spotlight. Another accused priest who was involved in the Spotlight scandal also pleaded guilty. The Globe's coverage encouraged other victims to come forward with allegations of abuse, resulting in numerous lawsuits and 249 criminal cases.

The sexual abuse scandal in Stockton diocese is a significant episode in the series of Catholic sex abuse cases in the United States and Ireland.

The sexual abuse scandal in the Catholic Archdiocese of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania, U.S., is a significant episode in the series of Catholic sex abuse cases in the United States, Ireland and elsewhere. The Philadelphia abuses were substantially revealed through a grand jury investigation in 2005. In early 2011, a new grand jury reported extensive new charges of abusive priests active in the archdiocese. In 2012, a guilty plea by priest Edward Avery and the related trial and conviction of William Lynn and mistrial on charges against James J. Brennan followed from the grand jury's investigations. In 2013, Charles Engelhardt and teacher Bernard Shero were tried, convicted and sentenced to prison. Lynn was the first official to be convicted in the United States of covering up abuses by other priests in his charge and other senior church officials have been extensively criticized for their management of the issue in the archdiocese.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boy Scouts of America sex abuse cases</span> Allegations involving child molestation

The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) is one of the largest youth organizations in the United States, with 2.3 million youth members and approximately 889,000 adult volunteers in 2017. In 1979 there were over 5 million youths in BSA.

David Kaye is a professional magician and author. He performs under the stage name Silly Billy.

<i>Square One: Michael Jackson</i> 2019 documentary film

Square One: Michael Jackson is a 2019 investigative documentary directed by Danny Wu. It focuses on the 1993 case in which Michael Jackson was accused of molesting a 13-year-old boy. Through interviews with people closest to the case, the film makes a case for Jackson's innocence. The interviews showcase statements from trial witnesses, Jackson's nephew, and legal assistant to the prosecutor in 1993.

References

  1. ↑ King, Loren (December 19, 2010). "Making dysfunction work for him". The Boston Globe . Archived from the original on January 16, 2018. Retrieved December 18, 2013.
  2. ↑ "Jesse Friedman's Website". freejesse.net. Retrieved January 22, 2022.
  3. ↑ Byrne, Peter (May 20, 2003). "Review of Capturing the Friedmans". BMJ . 328 (7444): 901. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7444.901. S2CID   56946426 . Retrieved October 25, 2013.
  4. ↑ "Presentation by Jesse Friedman". May 17, 2012. Archived from the original on December 3, 2012. Retrieved October 20, 2014.
  5. 1 2 Applebome, Peter (June 15, 2013). "Reinvestigating the Friedmans - The New York Times". The New York Times. Retrieved April 5, 2019.
  6. 1 2 3 Ebert, Roger (June 6, 2003). "Capturing the Friedmans". The Chicago Sun-Times . Retrieved January 2, 2023.
  7. ↑ "Capturing the Freidmans (2003)". Rotten Tomatoes . Fandango Media . Retrieved April 10, 2018.
  8. ↑ "Top 100 Movies of 2003". Rotten Tomatoes . Fandango Media. Archived from the original on September 24, 2011. Retrieved April 10, 2018.
  9. ↑ "Capturing the Friedmans". Metacritic .
  10. ↑ "Capturing the Friedmans (2003)". Box Office Mojo . IMDb . Retrieved April 10, 2018.
  11. ↑ Mitchell, Elvis (May 30, 2003). "Capturing the Friedmans". The New York Times . Retrieved January 2, 2023.
  12. ↑ Howe, Desson (June 13, 2003). "The Friedmans' Tale of the Tapes". The Washington Post . Retrieved January 2, 2023.
  13. ↑ Turan, Kenneth (June 13, 2003). "Cameras on, judgments off". Los Angeles Times . Archived from the original on August 24, 2003. Retrieved January 2, 2023.
  14. ↑ Nathan, Debbie (May 26, 2003). "Complex Persecution: A Long Island Family's Nightmare Struggle With Porn, Pedophilia, and Public Hysteria". The Village Voice . Archived from the original on July 24, 2008. Retrieved September 18, 2009.
  15. ↑ Vitello, Paul (January 11, 2004). "Documentary's haunting tale of abuse". Newsday . Archived from the original on November 17, 2009. Retrieved September 18, 2009.
  16. ↑ "Capturing the Friedmans subject makes fresh appeal to overturn sexual abuse conviction". The Guardian. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
  17. ↑ Waxman, Sharon (February 24, 2004). "Victims Say Film on Molesters Distorts Facts". The New York Times. Retrieved April 24, 2011.
  18. ↑ "76th Academy Awards". Oscars.org . Retrieved February 17, 2024.
  19. ↑ "'Rings' cycle continues with four Critics' Choice". Los Angeles Times . January 13, 2004. Retrieved January 13, 2004.
  20. ↑ "Awards Ceremony 56th Annual DGA Awards". Directors Guild of America. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
  21. ↑ King, Susan (January 9, 2004). "'Splendor' is L.A. critics' best film". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved December 28, 2017.
  22. ↑ "Awards for 2003". National Board of Review. Archived from the original on September 27, 2011. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
  23. ↑ "New York critics name Return of the King Best Picture". Entertainment Weekly . Retrieved February 17, 2024.
  24. ↑ "Sundance Festival: 2003". CBS News. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
  25. ↑ "Friedman v. Rehal". US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. August 17, 2010. Retrieved June 16, 2013– via Findlaw.
  26. ↑ Duke, Nathan (August 25, 2010). "Conviction of Friedman upheld". QNS. TimesLedger Newspapers . Retrieved June 16, 2013.
  27. ↑ "Report: 'Jesse Friedman was not wrongfully convicted' (Press release)". Nassau County District Attorney's Office. June 24, 2013. Archived from the original on October 5, 2018. Retrieved November 30, 2016.
  28. ↑ Gregorian, Dareh (June 25, 2013). "Jesse Friedman is 100% guilty of sexually abusing children, reinvestigation by Nassau County district attorney concludes". Daily News . New York, NY. Retrieved July 26, 2016.
  29. ↑ Applebome, Peter (June 24, 2013). "Teenager's 1988 Sexual-Abuse Conviction Was Justified, Report Says". The New York Times . Retrieved June 24, 2013.
  30. ↑ "Barry Scheck affidavit" (PDF). Retrieved January 22, 2022– via freejesse.net.
  31. ↑ Wise, Dan J. (June 24, 2014). "Scheck takes a different tack in Friedman case". Wise Law NY (wiselawny.wordpress.com). Retrieved October 13, 2013.
  32. ↑ "Statements of witnesses" . Retrieved January 22, 2022– via freejesse.net.
  33. ↑ Pinto, Nick (May 30, 2013). "Jesse Friedman: The interview". The Village Voice . Archived from the original on June 8, 2013. Retrieved June 13, 2013.
  34. ↑ "Ross Goldstein statement". November 25, 2020. Retrieved January 22, 2022– via freejesse.net.
  35. ↑ Pinto, Nick (May 19, 2013). "Jesse Friedman spent 13 years in prison as a notorious child rapist – he may soon get an apology". The Village Voice . Archived from the original on June 10, 2013. Retrieved June 16, 2013.
  36. ↑ Wegman, Jesse (February 9, 2015). "After a guilty plea, a prison term, and a movie, a sex abuse case returns". The New York Times . Retrieved February 10, 2015.
  37. ↑ "Court denies Jesse Friedman access to documents in sex abuse case". CBS New York . December 9, 2015. Retrieved July 7, 2016.
  38. ↑ "Matter of Friedman v. Rice". 2017. 2017 NY Slip Op 08167. Retrieved January 22, 2022– via justia.com.
  39. ↑ "Court of Appeals rejects Nassau County DA withholding documents". freejesse.net (Press release). November 11, 2017. Retrieved January 22, 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.