Charlesworth's Paradox is a paradox related to kin selection, Hamilton's Rule and the evolution of altruism. The paradox was proposed by Brian Charlesworth [1] and is sometimes used as a teaching example to discuss kin selection. [2] [3] [4]
Hamilton's rule states that altruistic genes or strategies (in a prisoner's dilemma for example) should increase in frequency if
Where
Charlesworth imagines a species of bird in which young can stay behind to help their parents care for the next season's young, rather than founding their own nests.
A situation arises where an individual can sacrifice its own reproductive success to save the lives of its four younger siblings. This will result in and (the 4 young survive and the older sibling dies). For siblings . Since this behaviour should evolve by Hamilton's rule. However it cannot be viable, because any individual exhibiting this behaviour sacrifices itself and does not reproduce.
McElreath and Boyd [3] suggest that Hamilton's rule only applies in cases of weak selection, which is an underlying assumption in deriving it. Other authors [5] resolve the paradox for strong selection through a modified version of inclusive fitness.