Charlesworth's paradox

Last updated

Charlesworth's Paradox is a paradox related to kin selection, Hamilton's Rule and the evolution of altruism. The paradox was proposed by Brian Charlesworth [1] and is sometimes used as a teaching example to discuss kin selection. [2] [3] [4]

Contents

The paradox

Hamilton's rule states that altruistic genes or strategies (in a prisoner's dilemma for example) should increase in frequency if

Where

Charlesworth imagines a species of bird in which young can stay behind to help their parents care for the next season's young, rather than founding their own nests.

A situation arises where an individual can sacrifice its own reproductive success to save the lives of its four younger siblings. This will result in and (the 4 young survive and the older sibling dies). For siblings . Since this behaviour should evolve by Hamilton's rule. However it cannot be viable, because any individual exhibiting this behaviour sacrifices itself and does not reproduce.

Resolution

McElreath and Boyd [3] suggest that Hamilton's rule only applies in cases of weak selection, which is an underlying assumption in deriving it. Other authors [5] resolve the paradox for strong selection through a modified version of inclusive fitness.

References

  1. Charlseworth, Brian (1978). "Some Models of the Evolution of Altruistic Behaviour between Siblings". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 72: 297–319.
  2. Dawkins, R. (1979). "Twelve misunderstandings of kin selection". Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 51 (2): 184–200.
  3. 1 2 McElreath, R; Boyd, R (2008). Mathematical models of social evolution: A guide for the perplexed. University of Chicago Press. ISBN   9780226558288.
  4. Ehud Lamm (2011). "A Gentle Introduction to The Price Equation" (PDF).
  5. Garcia‐Costoya, Guillermo; Fromhage, Lutz (2021). "Realistic genetic architecture enables organismal adaptation as predicted under the folk definition of inclusive fitness". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 34 (7): 1087–1094. doi:10.1111/jeb.13795.