Cluster reduction

Last updated

In phonology and historical linguistics, cluster reduction is the simplification of consonant clusters in certain environments or over time. Cluster reduction can happen in different languages, dialects of those languages, in world Englishes, and as a part of language acquisition.

Contents

Uses

Dialects of English

Different varieties of cluster reduction can be observed in numerous examples of English dialects around the world, including but not limited to New Zealand English, South Atlantic English, and African American Vernacular English. [1]

In some dialects of English such as AAVE certain historical consonant clusters reduce to single consonants at the ends of words, and is common in words in which one of the final consonants is alveolar (/t/, /d/, /s/, /z/): [2] friend rhymes with Ben, and cold is homophonous with coal. In both cases, a historical cluster of homorganic consonants loses a stop: /ˈfrɛn/,/ˈkoʊl/ However, in colder, where the consonant cluster falls between vowels, the /d/ remains: /ˈkoʊldɚ/. The similar word-final reduction of */mb/ to /m/ and */ŋɡ/ to /ŋ/ is complete in standard English (e.g. lamb, long), as it is in many other Germanic languages (e.g. Swedish lamm, lång).

In AAVE, this cluster reduction is the result of a phonological rule. In unambiguous situations, the clusters can be reduced without leaving the listener confused. [3] For example, the rule implies that a speaker could say "eight cat," when referring to multiple cats, but not "the cat" when referring to multiple cats. The latter statement would result in ambiguity, and listeners may become confused, thinking the speaker is talking about only one cat.

World languages

Italian is well known to have undergone cluster reduction, where stop clusters have become geminates. For example, Victoria has become Vittoria. In other words, articulation but not length has reduced. A similar occurrence is observed in Portuguese as well, but gemination is absent. Cluster reduction also takes place in Catalan, and in a similar way as it happens in English. Certain consonant clusters placed at the end of a word are reduced: cent/sen/ instead of /sent/, although they recover the reduced consonant when the cluster falls between vowels: centenar/səntəˈna/. This phenomenon does not exist in Valencian, though: cent/sent/ and centenar/senteˈnaɾ/.

Word-initial and word-final consonant clusters do not exist in the Japanese language. Therefore, Japanese ELLs may find producing English words with such clusters to be troublesome. [4] Common cluster simplification strategies for Japanese ELLs include cluster reduction (e.g., string /stɹɪŋ/ → /sɹɪŋ/) and epenthesis (e.g., /stɹɪŋ/ → /stəɹɪŋ/), which describes vowel additions within, or at the end of, words. [4]

World Englishes

Not only is cluster reduction common in specific languages, but it occurs in world Englishes, as well. For example, final consonant cluster reduction is common among those speaking dialects of Singapore English, and they may use cluster reduction strategies known as metathesis, glottalization, and deletion. [5] : 348  Clusters which have both /t/ and /k/ are usually reduced to [k]. [5] : 354  As in Singapore English, speakers of Nigerian English may also reduce or delete their final consonant clusters. Strategies of cluster reduction common in Nigerian English include metathesis or epenthesis with the vowels /u/ or /i/. An example of this occurs in the word silk, which Nigerian English speakers may say /silik/ instead. [5] : 348  Unlike Singapore English, /k/ and /t/ clusters are generally reduced to [t]. [5] : 354 

A common simplification process in Chicano English is word-final cluster simplification. For example, "ward" would sound like "war," and "start" would sound like "star." [6] : 467  In Spanish, there is a sequential constraint, and /s/ clusters cannot occur at the beginning of a word. Due to this constraint, epenthesis of a vowel in a word before the beginning /s/ cluster is common, such as in the words "school, "scare," and "spoon," which would sound like [iskul], [iskɛr], and [ispun], respectively. [6] : 467 

Language acquisition

In first language acquisition, children show similarities in the clusters they reduce and which consonant the clusters are reduced to. [7] : 397  Following are some common word-initial cluster reductions: Clusters including a fricative and a stop typically get reduced to the stop, as in [pun] for spoon. Clusters with a stop and a liquid usually reduce to the stop, such as in [bu] for blue. Clusters with a fricative then a liquid generally get reduced to the fricative, like in [fai] for fly. Clusters containing a stop and a glide are reduced to the stop, as in [kin] for queen. Fricative glide clusters are reduced to the fricative, like in [sɪm] for swim. Finally, nasal and glide clusters reduce to the nasal, such as in [musɪk] for music. [7] : 398 

/S/ clusters serve as a special case for development, as they are learned separately from other clusters, with some children learning them first and some learning them last. [8] : 982  In general, English-speaking children reduce /sl-/ clusters to [s] (as in /sling/ - /sing/), but reduce every other type of /s/ cluster (/sp-/, /st-/, /sk/, /sm-/, /sn-/, and /sw-/) to the second consonant in the cluster. [8] : 982 

In general, children may have trouble with the production of liquids /l/ and /r/. [9] : 103  To simplify clusters that include these liquids, children may replace these sounds for the glide /w/ or omit the sounds completely.

Two of the theories for liquid cluster development have been proposed by Greenlee (1974) and Elbert and McReynolds (1979). Greenlee (1974) introduced a three-stage process of developing stop and liquid consonant clusters which includes liquid deletion ([pɒt] for _plot_), substitution of the liquid with the glide [w] ([pwɒt]), and then correct production ([plɒt]). [10] : 87 

Elbert and McReynolds (1979) created a four-step process based on Greenlee's (1974) previous proposal, including stage one, where both consonants are deleted; stage two, where one consonant is kept while the other is omitted; stage three, where both consonants are produced, but not correctly; and stage four, which is the correct production of both consonants. [11] : 87  For example, _tree_ would first be produced as [i:], then [ti:], then [twi:], and, lastly, [tri:].

Cluster reduction also occurs in the Dutch language, similar to English. It is common for Dutch-speaking children to begin reducing clusters between ages 1;3 and 1;11. [12] : 974  The strategy tends to decrease between ages 2;6 and 3;0, and it drastically decreases by the time the children are 4;3. Some cluster reduction may linger until the age of 6, and development of clusters could last until the age of 10 for some. [12] : 973–974 

Consonant-cluster reduction is the most common phonological process used by Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children, and it has been found to be used the longest, sometimes past the age of 6;0. [13] : 761   Studies have not shown any gender differences in language acquisition for typically developing Brazilian children. [13] : 762 

Unlike Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children, differences in language acquisition have been found in Cantonese-speaking children. With consonants, girls tend to acquire both initial and final consonants before boys do. [13] : 762   Consonant clusters containing a fricative and /l/ are generally the final clusters acquired, and, by the ages of 7;6-7;11, typically developing children usually no longer reduce clusters. [13] : 766, 768 

Children using cochlear implants tend to use the same cluster-reduction strategies as children with normal hearing when learning words with consonant clusters. [14] : 157  When liquids and fricatives are present before a stop in a cluster, the liquid or fricative is more often the consonant that gets reduced. For example, /pleɪ/ gets reduced to [peɪ], and /skaɪ/ is reduced to [kaɪ]. [14] : 159 

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Allophone</span> Phone used to pronounce a single phoneme

In phonology, an allophone is one of multiple possible spoken sounds – or phones – used to pronounce a single phoneme in a particular language. For example, in English, the voiceless plosive and the aspirated form are allophones for the phoneme, while these two are considered to be different phonemes in some languages such as Central Thai. Similarly, in Spanish, and are allophones for the phoneme, while these two are considered to be different phonemes in English.

In linguistics, a liquid consonant or simply liquid is any of a class of consonants that consists of rhotics and voiced lateral approximants, which are also sometimes described as "R-like sounds" and "L-like sounds". The word liquid seems to be a calque of the Ancient Greek word ὑγρός, initially used by grammarian Dionysius Thrax to describe Greek sonorants.

A sound change, in historical linguistics, is a change in the pronunciation of a language. A sound change can involve the replacement of one speech sound by a different one or a more general change to the speech sounds that exist, such as the merger of two sounds or the creation of a new sound. A sound change can eliminate the affected sound, or a new sound can be added. Sound changes can be environmentally conditioned if the change occurs in only some sound environments, and not others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Non-native pronunciations of English</span> Overview of English-learners pronunciation

Non-native pronunciations of English result from the common linguistic phenomenon in which non-native speakers of any language tend to transfer the intonation, phonological processes and pronunciation rules of their first language into their English speech. They may also create innovative pronunciations not found in the speaker's native language.

Phonotactics is a branch of phonology that deals with restrictions in a language on the permissible combinations of phonemes. Phonotactics defines permissible syllable structure, consonant clusters and vowel sequences by means of phonotactic constraints.

In linguistics, a consonant cluster, consonant sequence or consonant compound, is a group of consonants which have no intervening vowel. In English, for example, the groups and are consonant clusters in the word splits. In the education field it is variously called a consonant cluster or a consonant blend.

Assimilation is a sound change in which some phonemes change to become more similar to other nearby sounds. A common type of phonological process across languages, assimilation can occur either within a word or between words.

In phonetics and phonology, a sonorant or resonant is a speech sound that is produced with continuous, non-turbulent airflow in the vocal tract; these are the manners of articulation that are most often voiced in the world's languages. Vowels are sonorants, as are semivowels like and, nasal consonants like and, and liquid consonants like and. This set of sounds contrasts with the obstruents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spanish phonology</span> Sound system of Spanish

This article is about the phonology and phonetics of the Spanish language. Unless otherwise noted, statements refer to Castilian Spanish, the standard dialect used in Spain on radio and television. For historical development of the sound system, see History of Spanish. For details of geographical variation, see Spanish dialects and varieties.

English phonology is the system of speech sounds used in spoken English. Like many other languages, English has wide variation in pronunciation, both historically and from dialect to dialect. In general, however, the regional dialects of English share a largely similar phonological system. Among other things, most dialects have vowel reduction in unstressed syllables and a complex set of phonological features that distinguish fortis and lenis consonants.

In phonology, epenthesis means the addition of one or more sounds to a word, especially in the beginning syllable (prothesis) or in the ending syllable (paragoge) or in-between two syllabic sounds in a word. The opposite process, where one or more sounds are removed, is referred to as elision.

Cypriot Greek is the variety of Modern Greek that is spoken by the majority of the Cypriot populace and Greek Cypriot diaspora. It is considered a divergent dialect as it differs from Standard Modern Greek in various aspects of its lexicon, phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax and even pragmatics, not only for historical reasons but also because of geographical isolation, and extensive contact with typologically distinct languages.

The phonology of Italian describes the sound system—the phonology and phonetics—of standard Italian and its geographical variants.

The phonological history of English includes various changes in the phonology of consonant clusters.

Prenasalized consonants are phonetic sequences of a nasal and an obstruent that behave phonologically like single consonants. The primary reason for considering them to be single consonants, rather than clusters as in English finger or member, lies in their behaviour; however, there may also be phonetic correlates which distinguish prenasalized consonants from clusters. Because of the additional difficulty in both articulation and timing, prenasalized fricatives and sonorants are not as common as prenasalized stops or affricates, and the presence of the former implies the latter. Only three languages have been reported to have a contrast between prenasalized consonants (NC) and their corresponding clusters (NC).

This article deals with the phonology and phonetics of Standard Modern Greek. For phonological characteristics of other varieties, see varieties of Modern Greek, and for Cypriot, specifically, see Cypriot Greek § Phonology.

Taos is a Tanoan language spoken by several hundred people in New Mexico, in the United States. The main description of its phonology was contributed by George L. Trager in a (pre-generative) structuralist framework. Earlier considerations of the phonetics-phonology were by John P. Harrington and Jaime de Angulo. Trager's first account was in Trager (1946) based on fieldwork 1935-1937, which was then substantially revised in Trager (1948). The description below takes Trager (1946) as the main point of departure and notes where this differs from the analysis of Trager (1948). Harrington's description is more similar to Trager (1946). Certain comments from a generative perspective are noted in a comparative work Hale (1967).

This article is about the sound system of the Navajo language. The phonology of Navajo is intimately connected to its morphology. For example, the entire range of contrastive consonants is found only at the beginning of word stems. In stem-final position and in prefixes, the number of contrasts is drastically reduced. Similarly, vowel contrasts found outside of the stem are significantly neutralized. For details about the morphology of Navajo, see Navajo grammar.

Afitti is a language spoken on the eastern side of Jebel el-Dair, a solitary rock formation in the North Kordofan province of Sudan. Although the term ‘Dinik’ can be used to designate the language regardless of cultural affiliation, people in the villages of the region readily recognize the terms ‘Ditti’ and ‘Afitti.’ There are approximately 4,000 speakers of the Afitti language and its closest linguistic neighbor is the Nyimang language, spoken west of Jebel el-Dair in the Nuba Mountains of the North Kordofan province of Sudan.

This article is about the phonology of Egyptian Arabic, also known as Cairene Arabic or Masri. It deals with the phonology and phonetics of Egyptian Arabic as well as the phonological development of child native speakers of the dialect. To varying degrees, it affects the pronunciation of Literary Arabic by native Egyptian Arabic speakers, as is the case for speakers of all other varieties of Arabic.

References

  1. ↑ Schreier, Daniel (2005). Consonant change in English worldwide : synchrony meets diachrony. Basingstoke [England]: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN   978-0-230-51332-7. OCLC   70191483.
  2. ↑ Fromkin, Victoria; Rodman, Robert; Hyams, Nina (2017). An Introduction to Language. Cengage Learning, Inc. p. 282. ISBN   978-1-33755958-4.
  3. ↑ Denham, Kristin; Lobeck, Anne (2010). Linguistics for Everyone. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. p. 160. ISBN   978-1-4130-1589-8.
  4. 1 2 Franklin, Amber; McDaniel, Lana (2016-05-01). "Exploring a Phonological Process Approach to Adult Pronunciation Training". American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 25 (2): 172–182. doi:10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0172. PMC   4972003 . PMID   27151825.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Gut, Ulrike (2007). "First language influence and final consonant clusters in the new Englishes of Singapore and Nigeria". World Englishes. 26 (3): 346–359. doi:10.1111/j.1467-971X.2007.00513.x. ISSN   1467-971X.
  6. 1 2 Fromkin, V; Rodman, R; Hyams, N (2003). An Introduction to Language. Thomson Heinle. p. 467.
  7. 1 2 Ohala, Diane K (November 1999). "The influence of sonority on children's cluster reductions". Journal of Communication Disorders. 32 (6): 397–422. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(99)00018-0. PMID   10560714.
  8. 1 2 Yavaş, Mehmet (2011-11-01). "Patterns of cluster reduction in the acquisition of #sC onsets: Are bilinguals different from monolinguals?". Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 25 (11–12): 981–988. doi:10.3109/02699206.2011.616643. ISSN   0269-9206. PMID   22106888. S2CID   12218059.
  9. ↑ McLeod, S.; Doorn, J. van; Reed, V. A. (1997-01-01). "Realizations of consonant clusters by children with phonological impairment". Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 11 (2): 85–113. doi:10.1080/02699209708985185. ISSN   0269-9206. PMID   21271753.
  10. ↑ McLeod, S.; Doorn, J. van; Reed, V. A. (1997-01-01). "Realizations of consonant clusters by children with phonological impairment". Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 11 (2): 85–113. doi:10.1080/02699209708985185. ISSN   0269-9206. PMID   21271753.
  11. ↑ McLeod, S.; Doorn, J. van; Reed, V. A. (1997-01-01). "Realizations of consonant clusters by children with phonological impairment". Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 11 (2): 85–113. doi:10.1080/02699209708985185. ISSN   0269-9206. PMID   21271753.
  12. 1 2 Haaften, Leenke van; Diepeveen, Sanne; Engel-Hoek, Lenie van den; Swart, Bert de; Maassen, Ben (2020). "Speech sound development in typically developing 2–7-year-old Dutch-speaking children: A normative cross-sectional study". International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 55 (6): 971–987. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12575. ISSN   1460-6984. PMID   33111376. S2CID   225099535.
  13. 1 2 3 4 Ceron, Marizete Ilha; Gubiani, Marileda Barichello; de, Oliveira Camila Rosa; Keske, -Soares Márcia (2017-04-14). "Factors Influencing Consonant Acquisition in Brazilian Portuguese–Speaking Children". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 60 (4): 759–771. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0208. PMID   28306754.
  14. 1 2 Chin, S.B.; Finnegan, K.R. (2000). "Consonant Cluster Production by Pediatric Users of Cochlear Implants". Volta Review. 102 (4): 157–174 – via EBSCOhost.

Pronunciation Training. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(2), 172–182.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.