Emba Hunutlu power station | |
---|---|
Country |
|
Coordinates | 36°48′58″N35°51′17″E / 36.81609°N 35.85481°E |
Status | operational |
Construction began |
|
Construction cost |
|
Owner(s) | |
Employees |
|
Thermal power station | |
Primary fuel | |
Cooling source | |
Power generation | |
Nameplate capacity |
|
Annual net output |
|
External links | |
Website | embapower |
Emba Hunutlu power station is a 1320 MW coal fired power station in Turkey [1] in Adana Province. [2] [3] As of 2022 [update] it is the largest Chinese foreign direct investment in the country. [4] Despite opposition from many environmental organisations the plant was started up in 2022 and burns Russian coal as it is cheaper than other coal. [5] [6] [4] The plant is less than 2 km from another coal-fired power station, İsken Sugözü. [7]
The project was proposed in 2012. [8] In 2015 it was licensed, despite environmental protests, [8] and Shanghai Electric Power said it would be China's largest ever direct investment in Turkey. [9]
In April 2019 a Belt and Road Initiative deal was signed to build the 1320 MW power station [3] and construction started in September. [1] It is also part of Turkey's Middle Corridor. [10]
In June 2022 opposition Republican People's Party Adana deputy Burhanettin Bulut called for a Parliamentary inquiry, complaining that the power plant was about to be started up despite ongoing lawsuits and a one hundred thousand signature petition. [11] [7]
Unit 1 started up in July 2022 and the other unit in October. [4]
The project is a joint venture between Shanghai Electric Power (a subsidiary of China's State Power Investment Corporation), Avic-Intl Project Engineering Company (3%), and two Turkish local investors, Mete Bülgün, CEO of the joint venture and Adnan Demir (9.4% each) [12] [2] with Shanghai Electric Power holding 78%. [12]
The finance is 20% capital [13] and the rest a 15-year $1.381 billion loan from China Development Bank, Bank of China and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. [3] [14]
In 2021 Turkey targeted net zero carbon emissions by 2053. [15] According to Banktrack the project is struggling with finance. [12] However others say the builders will make a profit. [16]
By 2020, according to Carbon Tracker, both new wind and solar power were cheaper than building new coal power plants; and they forecast that wind would become cheaper than existing coal plants in 2027, and solar in 2023: so they say that constructing the plant is a waste of money. [17] However the company benefited from value-added tax exemptions of almost 3.5 billion lira [18] in 2016. [19] WWF say it will make a loss. [20]
Test piles have been constructed [21] and in April 2019 Shanghai Electric Power said that "the successful signing of the facility agreement indicates that the project construction will enter into a fast-growth period". [3] However construction of the coal silos was delayed. [22]
The company says it will employ 4000 people in construction and 500 in operation. [2]
The thermal power station has 2x660 MW Ultra Super critical units with steam pressure of 27 MPa and reheat steam temperature of 600°C. [2]
Imported coal is stored in 3 large sea side silos, [23] and the plant can also run on local coal. [24]
The design is for gross efficiency up to 46% with a gross coal consumption rate less than 270 g/kWh (7000 kcal/kg LHV standard coal). [2]
The plant is cooled by water from Iskenderun Bay.
The selective catalytic reduction is designed to be more than 70% efficient, and according to the company will reduce NOx emissions to less than 100mg/Nm3. [2]
The design is for a combination of electrostatic precipitators, flue-gas desulfurization and wet scrubbers to reduce dust emissions to less than 5mg/Nm3. [2]
Mercury was not mentioned in the Environmental Impact Assessment but has been estimated at 175.5 kg/year. [25]
A public meeting was due to be held in January 2022 to discuss the environmental impact report for Emba Hunutlu, with the owners now adding 43 MW of wind and 37 MW of solar (the electricity for use on site), [26] [27] to the 1320 MW of coal power which had been due to open in 2021. [28] The company say that they devote themselves to building a power plant with "no pollution". [29] But environmental groups estimate that air pollution from the power station would cause an extra 50 early deaths per year. [25] Another estimate is that closing the plant by 2030, instead of when its licence ends in 2064, would prevent over 5000 premature deaths. [30]
The company has published safety guidelines. [31]
An expert report in 2020 concluded that the plant would be contrary to the İskenderun Bay (Adana-Mersin-Hatay) Integrated Coastal Areas Plan's principles, [32] and opponents say it contravenes the Biodiversity Convention. [33]
According to WWF-Turkey the project threatens the loggerhead sea turtles and green sea turtles which nest on nearby Sugözü Beach. Quoting the project environmental impact assessment as saying that the outgoing cooling water will be 7°C higher than the sea water, they say temperatures could exceed 35°C in summer and be fatal to the turtles. [34] Coal shipments and delivery might also disturb the turtles. [35]
As of 2019 [update] Turkey has no legal limit on fine particulate (PM2.5) emissions. The Health and Environment Alliance say that TurkStat figures show respiratory diseases have already increased in Adana Province, and that could be due to other coal-fired power stations. [34]
Shanghai Electric Power Company says it is "sustainable power generation" [36] but the power station will increase Turkey's greenhouse gas emissions: if operational according to its design capacity factor and lifetime it will emit over 200 million tonnes of carbon dioxide. [35]
Climate TRACE estimates it emitted over 5 million tons of the country's total 730 million tons of greenhouse gas in 2022: [37] the company is on the Urgewald Global Coal Exit List. [38]
TEMA Foundation filed a lawsuit in 2017 [39] and in 2018 several other organisations under the grouping of Doğu Akdeniz Çevre Platformu (East Mediterranean Environment Platform) were in ongoing legal action in Ankara. [40]
Yatağan Power Station is a coal-fired power station in Turkey in Yatağan, Muğla Province in the south-west of the country. Currently owned by Aydem Enerji it has a 120m chimney. Yatağan thermal power plant consumes 5.4 million tons of coal from mines such as Turgut and can produce 3,780 GWh annually, the least productive power station in Turkey. The area is a sulfur dioxide air pollution hotspot and as of 2017 the air pollution caused by Yatağan and neighboring Kemerköy power station and Yeniköy power station is estimated to have caused 45,000 premature deaths. It is estimated that closing the plant by 2030, instead of when its licence ends in 2063, would prevent over 9000 premature deaths. Two workers were killed in 2018 and the plant's safety has been criticized by the Chamber of Engineers.
Wind power generates about 10% of Turkey's electricity, mainly in the west in the Aegean and Marmara regions, and is gradually becoming a larger share of renewable energy in the country. As of 2024, Turkey has 12 gigawatts (GW) of wind turbines. The Energy Ministry plans to have almost 30 GW by 2035, including 5 GW offshore.
The Zonguldak Eren Termik Santrali (ZETES) power stations in Zonguldak are 3 coal-fired power stations in Turkey totaling 2790 MW owned by Eren Holding via Eren Enerji.
The Afşin-Elbistan power stations are coal-fired power stations in Afşin in Kahramanmaraş Province in Turkey. The area is a sulfur dioxide air pollution hotspot: Air pollution can be trapped by the surrounding mountains, and Greenpeace say that measurements they took nearby in late 2020 show illegal levels of particulates and nitrogen oxides. The Environment Ministry has not released the flue gas measurements.
Çayırhan power station is a 620 MW operational coal fired power station in Turkey in Ankara Province. In 2019 land was expropriated for another lignite mine, to feed the a proposed extension, which was opposed as uneconomic and eventually had its licence revoked.
Kemerköy power station is a 630 MW coal-fired power station in Turkey in Kemerköy, Muğla, completed in 1985, which burns lignite mined locally. Originally state owned by Electricity Generation Company it was sold in 2014 to Limak- IC İçtaş. In 2020 it received 140 million lira ($25,000,000) capacity payments.
Yeniköy power station is a 420 MW coal-fired power station in Turkey in Yeniköy, Muğla built in the late 20th century, which burns lignite mined locally. The plant is owned by Limak- IC İçtaş and in 2020 it received 93 million lira ($16,000,000) capacity payments. The area is a sulfur dioxide air pollution hotspot and as of 2017 the air pollution caused by Yeniköy and neighboring Yatağan power station and Kemerköy power station is estimated to have caused 45,000 premature deaths. It is estimated that closing the plant by 2030, instead of when its licence ends in 2063, would prevent over 7000 premature deaths.
Tunçbilek power station is a 365 MW coal-fired power station in Turkey in Kütahya built in the 1970s, which burns lignite from Tunçbilek coal mine. The plant is owned by Çelikler Holding and in 2018 received 41 million lira capacity payments. The area is a sulfur dioxide air pollution hotspot. According to İklim Değişikliği Politika ve Araştırma Derneği in 2021 the plant operated without a licence for 11 days without penalty.
Afşin-Elbistan C was a planned 1800-MW coal-fired power station which was proposed to be built in Turkey by the state-owned mining company Maden Holding. Estimated to cost over 17 billion lira, at planned capacity it would have generated about 3% of the nation's electricity. According to the environmental impact assessment (EIA) the plant would have burned 23 million tonnes of lignite annually, and emit over 61 million tonnes of CO2 each year for 35 years.
İsken Sugözü power station is a 1320 MW operational coal fired power station in Turkey.
Şırnak Silopi power station is a 405 MW operational power station in Silopi, in Şırnak Province in the south-east of Turkey. It is fuelled with asphaltite from Silopi asphaltite mine.
Çatalağzı power station (ÇATES) is a coal-fired power station in Turkey. Its two units opened in 1990 and 1991, and it was privatised in 2014. The plant was shut down for not meeting new air pollution regulations for coal in Turkey in January 2020, but was granted a one-year temporary operating licence by the Turkish Environment Ministry in June.
Coal in Turkey generated a third of the nation's electricity in 2023. There are 54 active coal-fired power stations with a total capacity of 21 gigawatts (GW). In 2023 coal imports for electricity generation cost 3.7 billion USD.
Soma Kolin power station is a 510-megawatt coal-fired power station in Turkey in Manisa Province, which burns lignite mined locally. The planned original site was changed after local protests. Both units were funded by Turkish banks, built by Harbin Power Equipment, are subcritical and started generating in 2019.
Bekirli power station or İÇDAŞ Bekirli-2 power station or İÇDAŞ Biga-2 power station is a 2 unit 1200-megawatt coal-fired power station in Turkey in Çanakkale Province owned by İÇDAŞ, which burns imported and local coal and receives capacity payments. İşbank provided construction finance. Opponents say it is one of many polluting industries in the area.
Biga power station is a 405 MW coal-fired power station in Turkey in Değirmencik, Biga, in Çanakkale built in the early 21st century.
Çolakoğlu power station is a 190-megawatt coal-fired power station in Turkey in Gebze, Kocaeli Province, which burns imported and local coal. The company called Marmara Elektrik is part of Çolakoğlu Group, and has been put on the Urgewald Global Coal Exit List.
Soma A power station is a 44 MW coal-fired power station in Soma, Manisa in western Turkey. The station closed in 2010 but was reopened in 2012 for research and development by the state owned Electricity Generation Company. It has not yet been permanently closed despite pollution complaints.
Yunus Emre power station is a coal-fired power station in Turkey in Eskişehir Province. As of 2023 it is partially operational.