Ephelcomenus

Last updated

Ephelcomenus
Temporal range: Palaeogene
Ꞓ
O
S
D
C
P
T
J
K
Pg
N
↓
(stratigraphic range uncertain)
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Artiodactyla
Family:† Anoplotheriidae
Subfamily:† Anoplotheriinae
Genus:† Ephelcomenus
Hürzeler, 1938
Species:
†E. filholi
Binomial name
†Ephelcomenus filholi
(Lydekker, 1889)
Synonyms
  • Hyracodontherium filholiLydekker, 1889

Ephelcomenus is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the Anoplotheriidae that were endemic to Western Europe. It contains one species E. filholi, which was first described by Richard Lydekker in 1889 but eventually classified to its own genus by the Swiss palaeontologist Johannes Hürzeler in 1938. It has an uncertain stratigraphic range, but some sources suggest that it was present in the Oligocene after the Grande Coupure turnover event of western Europe.

Contents

Ephelconemus has several unusual traits compared to other anoplotheriids, such as an elongated and tusk-shaped first upper incisor and a hollow first phalanx. The latter trait, along with the typical flexible limb morphologies of anoplotheriids, led Hürzeler to hypothesize that it was specialized for fossorial behaviors, meaning that it may have burrowed and eaten grounded plant material. The hypothesis has not been tested, but other members of the subfamily Anoplotheriinae such as Anoplotherium and Diplobune are also suggested to have unusual adaptations as well. It was larger in size compared to other anoplotheriines except for Anoplotherium and most species of Diplobune and likely inhabited forested environments.

Taxonomy

In 1938, Swiss palaeontologist Johannes Hürzeler wrote about an artiodactyl that he observed was from the middle Stampien (= Rupelian). He reviewed species classified to the anoplotheriid genus Hyracodontherium, previously erected by Henri Filhol in 1877. Among them, he stated that the type species H. primaevum belonged to the genus Diplobune , effectively making Hyracodontherium a synonym of Diplobune. He also stated that he was unsure about the validity of H. crassum. Hürzeler also established that H. filholi, erected previously by Richard Lydekker in 1889, was not a species of Diplobune based on dental and postcranial differences. As a result of the taxonomic changes, he erected the genus Ephelcomenus for the reclassified species E. filholi. [1]

Classification

Upper jaw and dentition of "Hyracodontherium filholi" (= Ephelcomenus filholi). The upper jaw was referenced by Johannes Hurzeler in 1938. Hyracodontherium Ephelcomenus filholi dentition.png
Upper jaw and dentition of "Hyracodontherium filholi" (= Ephelcomenus filholi). The upper jaw was referenced by Johannes Hürzeler in 1938.

Ephelcomenus belongs to the Anoplotheriidae, a Palaeogene artiodactyl family endemic to western Europe that lived from the middle Eocene to the early Oligocene (~44 to 30 Ma, possible earliest record at ~48 Ma). The exact evolutionary origins and dispersals of the anoplotheriids are uncertain, but they exclusively resided within the continent when it was an archipelago that was isolated by seaway barriers from other regions such as Balkanatolia and the rest of eastern Eurasia. The Anoplotheriidae's relations with other members of the Artiodactyla are not well-resolved, with some determining it to be either a tylopod (which includes camelids and merycoidodonts of the Palaeogene) or a close relative to the infraorder and some others believing that it may have been closer to the Ruminantia (which includes tragulids and other close Palaeogene relatives). [2] [3]

The Anoplotheriidae consists of two subfamilies, the Dacrytheriinae and Anoplotheriinae, the latter of which is the subfamily that Ephelcomenus belongs to. The Dacrytheriinae is the older subfamily of the two that first appeared in the middle Eocene (since the Mammal Palaeogene zones unit MP13, possibly up to MP10), although some authors consider them to be a separate family in the form of the Dacrytheriidae. [4] [5] Anoplotheriines made their first appearances by the late Eocene (MP15–MP16), or ~41–40 Ma, within western Europe with Duerotherium and Robiatherium . After a significant gap of anoplotheriines in MP17a–MP17b, the derived anoplotheriids Anoplotherium and Diplobune made their first appearances in western Europe by MP18, although their exact origins are unknown. [6]

Ephelcomenus is not known by common remains compared to other anoplotheriids, so its stratigraphic range is poorly known. It is suggested that Ephelcomenus may have been present in the middle Oligocene of western Europe, which if true would have meant that it extended far past the Grande Coupure extinction event. [6] [4]

Conducting studies focused on the phylogenetic relations within the Anoplotheriidae has proven difficult due to the general scarcity of fossil specimens of most genera. [6] The phylogenetic relations of the Anoplotheriidae as well as the Xiphodontidae, Mixtotheriidae, and Cainotheriidae have also been elusive due to the selenodont morphologies of the molars, which were convergent with tylopods or ruminants. [7] Some researchers considered the selenodont families Anoplotheriidae, Xiphodontidae, and Cainotheriidae to be within Tylopoda due to postcranial features that were similar to the tylopods from North America in the Palaeogene. [8] Other researchers tie them as being more closely related to ruminants than tylopods based on dental morphology. Different phylogenetic analyses have produced different results for the "derived" selenodont Eocene European artiodactyl families, making it uncertain whether they were closer to the Tylopoda or Ruminantia. [9] [10]

In an article published in 2019, Romain Weppe et al. conducted a phylogenetic analysis on the Cainotherioidea within the Artiodactyla based on mandibular and dental characteristics, specifically in terms of relationships with artiodactyls of the Palaeogene. The results retrieved that the superfamily was closely related to the Mixtotheriidae and Anoplotheriidae. They determined that the Cainotheriidae, Robiacinidae, Anoplotheriidae (represented below by Anoplotherium and Dacrytherium ), and Mixtotheriidae formed a clade that was the sister group to the Ruminantia while Tylopoda, along with the Amphimerycidae and Xiphodontidae split earlier in the tree. [10] The phylogenetic tree published in the article and another work about the cainotherioids is outlined below: [11]

In 2022, Weppe created a phylogenetic analysis in his academic thesis regarding Palaeogene artiodactyl lineages, focusing most specifically on the endemic European families. The phylogenetic tree, according to Weppe, is the first to conduct phylogenetic affinities of all anoplotheriid genera, although not all individual species were included. He found that the Anoplotheriidae, Mixtotheriidae, and Cainotherioidea form a clade based on synapomorphic dental traits (traits thought to have originated from their most recent common ancestor). The result, Weppe mentioned, matches up with previous phylogenetic analyses on the Cainotherioidea with other endemic European Palaeogene artiodactyls that support the families as a clade. As a result, he argued that the proposed superfamily Anoplotherioidea, composing of the Anoplotheriidae and Xiphodontidae as proposed by Alan W. Gentry and Hooker in 1988, is invalid due to the polyphyly of the lineages in the phylogenetic analysis. However, the Xiphodontidae was still found to compose part of a wider clade with the three other groups. He said that Ephelcomenus, Duerotherium, and Robiatherium compose a clade of the Anoplotheriidae. [7] [12]

Description

Skull and dentition

Skull of the related Anoplotherium commune, National Museum of Natural History, France Anoplotherium commune 667.JPG
Skull of the related Anoplotherium commune, National Museum of Natural History, France

Unlike Anoplotherium and Diplobune, Ephelcomenus is known only by a few fragmentary cranial remains, including some mandibular remains. [1] The mandible is diagnosed as rapidly increasing in height by the rear end, which Jean Viret in 1961 cited to be a trait differing it from Anoplotherium and Diplobune. [13] However, the mandible of Diplobune is also observed to have increased in height in the back area. [4]

The dental formula of the Anoplotheriidae is 3.1.4.33.1.4.3 for a total of 44 teeth, consistent with the primitive dental formula for early-middle Palaeogene placental mammals. [14] [15] Anoplotheriids have selenodont (crescent-shaped ridge form) or bunoselenodont (bunodont (or rounded) and selenodont (crescent-shaped ridge form)) premolars (P/p) and molars (M/m) made for leaf-browsing diets. The canines (C/c) of the Anoplotheriidae are overall undifferentiated from the incisors (I/i). The lower premolars of the family are piercing and elongated. The upper molars are bunoselenodont in form while the lower molars have selenodont labial cuspids and bunodont lingual cuspids. The subfamily Anoplotheriinae differs from the Dacrytheriinae by the molariform premolars with crescent-shaped paraconules and the lower molars that lack a third cusp between the metaconid and entoconid. [3]

An unusual trait of Ephelcomenus is the prominently elongated and tusk-shaped I1 (first upper incisor). The I2 is seemingly reduced in comparison. The upper premolars are short, stocky, and simple in comparison. The upper molars are also short but increase in size from M1 to M3. The M1 and M2 is subtriangular in outline while that of M3 is triangular, resulting from the reduction of the metaconule cusp and different position of the metaconule cusp. The protocone cusp of the upper molars of Ephelcomenus is larger and more centrally positioned compared to those of other anoplotheriids. [1] [13] [4]

The lower premolars are also short broad in shape compared to those of Diplobune. P2 is shorter than P1 whereas P4 is shorter and weaker than P3. The lower molars are similarly short and have sharp crescent shapes. There is currently no fossil evidence of mandibular front teeth of Ephelcomenus. [1]

Gérard de Beaumont in 1963 cast doubt that one dental remains specimen attributed to Ephelcomenus filholi really belongs to the species, explaining that the M3 tooth was too small compared to the expected size of the tooth of the anoplotheriid species. He felt that the tooth should be classified elsewhere but did not further elaborate where it should be reclassified to. [16]

Limbs

Hürzeler described postcranial remains attributed to one individual that was collected from the French commune of Saint-André, Pyrénées-Orientales and held in a University of Lyon collection, namely a distal end of a right humerus, a first phalanx, and proximal ends of a radius and ulna. [1]

The palaeontologist was unable to observe what little remained of the diaphysis of the humerus, but he was able to tell that it lacked any entepicondylar foramen. The transverse diameter of the bone is about equivalent in size to that of the humerus of Diplobune from Ulm, Germany. Ephelcomenus differs from Diplobune by a less lengthy capitulum of the humerus and a longer trochlea of the humerus. [1] Diplobune minor differs from Ephelcomenus also by a much deeper trochlea. [17] As a result, the distal end of the humerus of Ephelcomenus is more slender compared to that of Diplobune. [13]

The proximal end of the radius is divided into a circular and concave middle area and two side areas adjacent to the middle area that bend away at an angle. While the two side pieces of Diplobune are about the same size as each other, the lateral piece of the radius' distal end of Ephelcomenus is larger than the medial piece. The articular circumference of the head of the radius of Ephelcomenus is smaller and less evenly curved than that of Diplobune. The radius is similar to that of Diplobune by the long and slender radius of the diaphysis plus constant sagittal diameter. The front area of the diaphysis has a clear and short edge for attachments to flexible muscles. The ulna of Ephelcomenus does not show significant differences from that of Diplobune. [1]

The first phalanx of Ephelcomenus is slightly less wide but significantly shorter than that of Diplobune. Hürzeler speculated that the phalanx may have belonged to the front foot of the anoplothere. Notably, the phalanx is heavily hollowed in its proximal end, with a deep opening in the "metapodial keel" and a deep groove resulting from the open distal articular surface. [1] [13]

Size

Ephelcomenus does not have any direct size or weight estimate, but Miguel-Ángel Cuesta and Ainara Badiola discussed size comparisons of anoplotheriines. They said that Ephelcomenus would have been larger than Robiatherium and Duerotherium but smaller than Anoplotherium and Diplobune (except for D. minor, which would have similar in size to Duerotherium). [6]

Palaeobiology

The anatomies of anoplotheriids have no modern analogues with respect to other artiodactyls due to unusual postcranial morphologies. They are known by highly mobile elbow joints and specialized humerus morphologies allowing for flexible motions between the humerus and radius. [4] [18] Modern-day hypotheses range from arborealism in the case of Diplobune [19] [20] to bipedalism in the case of Anoplotherium. [8]

Ephelcomenus similarly has a high elbow mobility and similar morphology of the humerus to those of carnivorans. [4] The unusual morphologies of both the first phalanx and elbow joint led Hürzeler to believe that its behaviours were significantly different from those of other anoplotheres. He suggested that Ephelcomenus may have had habits similar to fossorial animals such as pangolins of the genus Manis , meaning that it could have been specialized for burrowing. [1] [13] Its nails may served to excavate burrows, although very little of its skeleton is known. [21] Jean Sudre in 1982 suggested that if the hypothesis is true, it could have fed on food extracted from the ground, such as rhizomes, bulbs, and roots, and other grounded plant material. He also said that Diplobune minor would not have had burrowing behaviours even if it had similar phalanx morphologies on the grounds that lengths and arrangements of digits III and IV reflect more use of balance movements such as arborealism. [19] It likely lived in forested environments similar to Diplobune. [4]

Palaeoecology

Diplobune species such as D. minor (pictured) were present in the late Eocene and early Oligocene of western Europe Life reconstruction of Diplobune minor.png
Diplobune species such as D. minor (pictured) were present in the late Eocene and early Oligocene of western Europe

The exact stratigraphic range of Ephelcomenus, while clearly within the Palaeogene period, remains uncertain. [4] [3] The Eocene environmental trends and faunal assemblages of western Europe differed dramatically from those of the continent in the Oligocene due to warmer and subtropical climates plus strong levels of endemism given the isolation of western Europe as an archipelago from other landmasses by the early Eocene. [2] [22] The Anoplotheriidae, which Ephelcomenus belongs to, was one of the European artiodactyl groups endemic to Europe. [23]

If Ephelcomenus was present in western Europe during the middle Eocene-earliest Oligocene prior to the Grande Coupure extinction/turnover event, that means that it would have likely been present with a wide variety of other artiodactyls, namely those of endemic families (i.e. Choeropotamidae, Cebochoeridae, Mixtotheriidae, Xiphodontidae, Cainotheriidae, and other members of Anoplotheriidae) and more widespread families (Dichobunidae, Tapirulidae, and Anthracotheriidae). [4] [9] [24] [25] It also likely could have coexisted with other mammals such as the Perissodactyla (Palaeotheriidae), [26] Primates (Adapoidea and Omomyoidea), [27] Hyaenodonta (Hyaenodontinae, Hyainailourinae, and Proviverrinae), [28] Carnivoramorpha (Miacidae), Carnivora (small-sized Amphicyonidae), [28] and endemic rodents (Pseudosciuridae, Theridomyidae, and Gliridae). [29]

If the anoplotheriid genus either survived past the Grande Coupure or was exclusive to the Oligocene, it would have coexisted with post-Grande Coupure survivors as well as non-endemic immigrant faunas originating from eastern Eurasia. Examples of immigrant faunas include later anthracotheres, ruminants (Gelocidae, Lophiomerycidae, and Bachitheriidae), rhinocerotoids (Rhinocerotidae, Amynodontidae, and Eggysodontidae), carnivorans (Nimravidae, Ursidae and later Amphicyonidae), eastern Eurasian rodents (Eomyidae, Cricetidae, and Castoridae), and eulipotyphlans (Erinaceidae). [30] [31] [32] [33]

Related Research Articles

<i>Palaeotherium</i> Extinct genus of mammals

Palaeotherium is an extinct genus of equoid that lived in Europe and possibly the Middle East from the Middle Eocene to the Early Oligocene. It is the type genus of the Palaeotheriidae, a group exclusive to the Palaeogene that was closest in relation to the Equidae, which contains horses plus their closest relatives and ancestors. Fossils of Palaeotherium were first described in 1782 by the French naturalist Robert de Lamanon and then closely studied by another French naturalist, Georges Cuvier, after 1798. Cuvier erected the genus in 1804 and recognized multiple species based on overall fossil sizes and forms. As one of the first fossil genera to be recognized with official taxonomic authority, it is recognized as an important milestone within the field of palaeontology. The research by early naturalists on Palaeotherium contributed to the developing ideas of evolution, extinction, and succession and demonstrating the morphological diversity of different species within one genus.

<i>Anoplotherium</i> Extinct genus of endemic Paleogene European artiodactyls

Anoplotherium is the type genus of the extinct Palaeogene artiodactyl family Anoplotheriidae, which was endemic to Western Europe. It lived from the Late Eocene to the earliest Oligocene. It was the fifth fossil mammal genus to be described with official taxonomic authority, with a history extending back to 1804 when its fossils from Montmartre in Paris, France were first described by the French naturalist Georges Cuvier. Discoveries of incomplete skeletons of A. commune in 1807 led Cuvier to thoroughly describe unusual features for which there are no modern analogues. His drawn skeletal and muscle reconstructions of A. commune in 1812 were amongst the first instances of anatomical reconstructions based on fossil evidence. Cuvier's contributions to palaeontology based on his works on the genus were revolutionary for the field, not only proving the developing ideas of extinction and ecological succession but also paving the way for subfields such as palaeoneurology. Today, there are four known species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Xiphodontidae</span> Extinct family of mammals

Xiphodontidae is an extinct family of herbivorous even-toed ungulates, endemic to Europe during the Eocene 40.4—33.9 million years ago, existing for about 7.5 million years. Paraxiphodon suggests that they survived into the Lower Oligocene, at least.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anoplotheriidae</span> Extinct family of mammals

Anoplotheriidae is an extinct family of artiodactyl ungulates. They were endemic to Europe during the Eocene and Oligocene epochs about 44—30 million years ago. Its name is derived from the Ancient Greek: ἂνοπλος ("unarmed") and θήριον ("beast"), translating as "unarmed beast".

<i>Pterodon</i> (mammal) Extinct genus of mammals

Pterodon is an extinct genus of hyaenodont in the family Hyainailouridae, containing five species. The type species Pterodon dasyuroides is known exclusively from the late Eocene to the earliest Oligocene of western Europe. The genus was first erected by the French zoologist Henri Marie Ducrotay de Blainville in 1839, who said that Georges Cuvier presented one of its fossils to a conference in 1828 but died before he could make a formal description of it. It was the second hyaenodont genus with taxonomic validity after Hyaenodon, but this resulted in taxonomic confusion over the validities of the two genera by other taxonomists. Although the taxonomic status of Pterodon was revised during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, it became a wastebasket taxon for other hyaenodont species found in Africa and Asia. Today, only the type species is recognized as belonging to the genus while four others are pending reassessment to other genera.

Duerotherium is an extinct genus of artiodactyl that lived during the Middle Eocene and is only known from the Iberian Peninsula. The genus is a member of the family Anoplotheriidae and the subfamily Anoplotheriinae, and contains one species, D. sudrei. Like other anoplotheriids, it was endemic to Western Europe. The genus was described based on a left fragment of a maxilla from the Mazaterón Formation of the Duero Basin, from which its name derives, in 2009. Its dentition is mostly typical of the Anoplotheriinae but differs from related genera in the elongated and triangular third upper premolar and traits of the molars. It is thought to have been part of an endemic fauna that evolved in the Iberian Peninsula during the Middle Eocene, when climates were subtropical.

<i>Xiphodon</i> Extinct genus of endemic Palaeogene European artiodactyls

Xiphodon is the type genus of the extinct Palaeogene artiodactyl family Xiphodontidae. It, like other xiphodonts, was endemic to Western Europe and lived from the middle Eocene up to the earliest Oligocene. Fossils from Montmartre in Paris, France that belonged to X. gracilis were first described by the French naturalist Georges Cuvier in 1804. Although he assigned the species to Anoplotherium, he recognized that it differed from A. commune by its dentition and limb bones, later moving it to its own subgenus in 1822. Xiphodon was promoted to genus rank by other naturalists in later decades. It is today defined by the type species X. gracilis and two other species, X. castrensis and X. intermedium.

<i>Plagiolophus</i> (mammal) Extinct genus of mammals

Plagiolophus is an extinct genus of equoids belonging to the family Palaeotheriidae. It lived in Europe from the middle Oligocene to the early Oligocene. The type species P. minor was initially described by the French naturalist Georges Cuvier in 1804 based on postcranial material including a now-lost skeleton originally from the Paris Basin. It was classified to Palaeotherium the same year but was reclassified to the subgenus Plagiolophus, named by Auguste Pomel in 1847. Plagiolophus was promoted to genus rank by subsequent palaeontologists and today includes as many as seventeen species. As proposed by the French palaeontologist Jean A. Remy in 2004, it is defined by three subgenera: Plagiolophus, Paloplotherium, and Fraasiolophus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cainotheriidae</span> Extinct family of mammals

Cainotheriidae is an extinct family of artiodactyls known from the Late Eocene to Middle Miocene of Europe. They are mostly found preserved in karstic deposits.

<i>Dichodon</i> (mammal) Extinct genus of endemic Palaeogene European artiodactyls

Dichodon is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the family Xiphodontidae. It was endemic to Western Europe and lived from the middle Eocene up to the earliest Oligocene. The genus was first erected by the British naturalist Richard Owen in 1848 based on dental remains from the fossil beds in Hordle, England. He noticed similar dentitions to contemporary artiodactyls like those of the Anoplotheriidae and Dichobunidae and references the name of the genus Dichobune. Eventually, it was found to be more closely related to Xiphodon and now includes 11 species, although one of them may be synonymous.

Research history of <i>Anoplotherium</i> Studies of a genus of endemic Paleogene European artiodactyls

The research history of Anoplotherium spans back to 1804 when Georges Cuvier first described the fossils of this extinct artiodactyl and named the genus after describing Palaeotherium, making it one of the first fossil mammal genera to be described as well as having one of the earliest official taxonomic authorities. It was also amongst the first fossil genera to be reconstructed by drawings and biomechanics. Subsequent descriptions of fossil evidence by Cuvier are also said to have been some of the earliest instances of palaeoneurology and palaeopathology. Anoplotherium was a significant find in palaeontological history and was once an iconic element of text and classroom sources of palaeontology, geology, and natural history. Today, it has a lessened cultural status compared to the 19th century as a result of public interest in Mesozoic dinosaurs or Neogene-Quaternary mammals, but it is still regularly acknowledged in sources of the history of palaeontology.

<i>Diplobune</i> Extinct genus of endemic Palaeogene European artiodactyls

Diplobune is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the family Anoplotheriidae. It was endemic to Europe and lived from the late Eocene to the early Oligocene. The genus was first erected as a subgenus of Dichobune by Ludwig Rütimeyer in 1862 based on his hypothesis of the taxon being a transitional form between "Anoplotherium" secundaria, previously erected by Georges Cuvier in 1822, and Dichobune. He based the genus etymology off of the two-pointed pillarlike shapes of the lower molars, which had since been a diagnosis of it. However, in 1870, Diplobune was elevated to genus rank by Oscar Fraas, who recognized that Diplobune was a distinct genus related to Anoplotherium and not Dichobune. After several revisions of the anoplotheriids, there are currently four known species of which D. minor is the type species.

<i>Dacrytherium</i> Extinct genus of endemic Palaeogene European artiodactyls

Dacrytherium is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the family Anoplotheriidae. It occurred from the Middle to Late Eocene of Western Europe and is the type genus of the subfamily Dacrytheriinae, the older of the two anoplotheriid subfamilies. Dacrytherium was first erected in 1876 by the French palaeontologist Henri Filhol, who recognised in his studies that it had dentition similar to the anoplotheriids Anoplotherium and Diplobune but differed from them by a deep preorbital fossa and a lacrimal fossa, the latter of which is where the genus name derives from. D. ovinum, originally classified in Dichobune, is the type species of Dacrytherium. Henri Filhol named D. elegans in 1884, and Hans Georg Stehlin named the species D. priscum and D. saturnini in 1910.

<i>Catodontherium</i> Extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls

Catodontherium is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the family Anoplotheriidae. It was endemic to Western Europe and had a temporal range exclusive to the middle Eocene, although its earliest appearance depends on whether C. argentonicum is truly a species of Catodontherium. It was first named Catodus by the French palaeontologist Charles Depéret in 1906, who created two species for the genus and later changed the genus name to Catodontherium in 1908. The Swiss palaeontologist Hans Georg Stehlin renamed one species and classified two other newly erected species to Catodontherium in 1910. Today, there are four known species, although two remain questionable in genus placement.

Robiatherium is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls containing one species R. cournovense. The genus name derives from the locality of Robiac in France where some of its fossil were described plus the Greek θήρ/therium meaning "beast" or "wild animal". It was known only from the middle Eocene and, like other anoplotheriids, was endemic to Western Europe. The genus was erected by Jean Sudre in 1988 for a species originally attributed to the xiphodont genus Paraxiphodon in 1978. Robiatherium had dentitions typical of the subfamily Anoplotheriinae, differing from other genera by specific differences in the molars. It is one of the earliest-appearing anoplotheriine species in the fossil record as well as the earliest to have appeared in Central Europe.

<i>Mixtotherium</i> Extinct genus of endemic Palaeogene European artiodactyls

Mixtotherium is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the monotypic family Mixtotheriidae. Known informally as mixtotheriids or mixtotheres, these artiodactyls were endemic to western Europe and occurred from the middle to late Eocene. The genus and type species were both first established by the French naturalist Henri Filhol in 1880. Several species are well known by good skull fossils, which were informative enough to allow for classifications of the species to their own family. The Mixtotheriidae, first recognized by Helga Sharpe Pearson in 1927, is currently known by 7 valid species, although M. priscum is thought by several authors to be synonymous with M. gresslyi. The affinities of the Mixtotheriidae in relation to other artiodactyl families is uncertain, but it is currently thought to have been related to the Cainotherioidea and Anoplotheriidae.

Haplomeryx is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the family Xiphodontidae. It was endemic to Western Europe and lived from the middle Eocene up to the earliest Oligocene. Haplomeryx was first established as a genus by the German naturalist Max Schlosser in 1886 based on a molar tooth set from Quercy Phosphorites deposits. Three additional species were erected and classified to the xiphodontid genus while one other species, first recognized in 1822, was tentatively classified to it and remains unresolved in affinity.

<i>Amphimeryx</i> Extinct genus of endemic Palaeogene European artiodactyls

Amphimeryx is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the Amphimerycidae that was endemic to the central region of western Europe and lived from the Late Eocene to the Early Oligocene. It was erected in 1848 by the French palaeontologist Auguste Pomel, who argued that its dentition was roughly similar to those of ruminants. Hence, the etymology of the genus name means "near ruminant," of which it derives from the ancient Greek words ἀμφί (near) and μήρυξ (ruminant). The type species A. murinus was previously recognized as a species of Dichobune by the French palaeontologist Georges Cuvier in 1822 before its eventual reclassification to its own genus. Two other species A. collotarsus and A. riparius are recognized also today although the former may be synonymous with A. murinus while the latter is known solely by a now-lost fossil specimen.

<i>Pseudamphimeryx</i> Extinct genus of endemic Palaeogene European artiodactyls

Pseudamphimeryx is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the Amphimerycidae that was endemic to the central region of western Europe and lived from the Middle to Late Eocene. It was first erected in 1910 by the Swiss palaeontologist Hans Georg Stehlin, who assigned to it multiple species and noted specific differences from another amphimerycid Amphimeryx. As of present, it is known by six species, although the validity of P. valdensis has been questioned while the earliest-appearing species P. schosseri has been suggested to not be an amphimerycid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amphimerycidae</span> Extinct family of artiodactyls

Amphimerycidae is an extinct family of artiodactyls that was endemic to western Europe that lived from the Middle Eocene to the Early Oligocene. With a taxonomic history extending as far back as 1804, the family was formally recognized by the Swiss palaeontologist Hans Georg Stehlin in 1910 and contains two genera: Amphimeryx and Pseudamphimeryx. Both amphimerycid genera are very similar to each other in terms of skull and dental anatomy but do have specific differences from each other. Both genera are best known from their fused cuboid bone and navicular bone, which together make up a single "cubonavicular bone" of the hind legs. This trait had long been used in support of the idea that they were ruminants by taxonomists. However, their classification to the Ruminantia had also been rejected by other taxonomists later on due to differences in dentition; the systematic position of the Amphimerycidae and close relatives in relation to the wider Artiodactyla, as a result, is unclear.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Hürzeler, Johannes (1938). "Ephelcomenus nov. gen. ein Anoplotheriide aus dem mitleren Stampien". Verhandlungen der Schweizerischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft. 31: 317–326.
  2. 1 2 Licht, Alexis; Métais, Grégoire; Coster, Pauline; İbilioğlu, Deniz; Ocakoğlu, Faruk; Westerweel, Jan; Mueller, Megan; Campbell, Clay; Mattingly, Spencer; Wood, Melissa C.; Beard, K. Christopher (2022). "Balkanatolia: The insular mammalian biogeographic province that partly paved the way to the Grande Coupure". Earth-Science Reviews. 226: 103929. Bibcode:2022ESRv..22603929L. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103929 .
  3. 1 2 3 Badiola, Ainara; De Vicuña, Nahia Jiménez; Perales-Gogenola, Leire; Gómez-Olivencia, Asier (2023). "First clear evidence of Anoplotherium (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) in the Iberian Peninsula: an update on the Iberian anoplotheriines". The Anatomical Record: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology. doi: 10.1002/ar.25238 . PMID   37221992. S2CID   258864256.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Erfurt, Jörg; Métais, Grégoire (2007). "Endemic European Paleogene Artiodactyls". In Prothero, Donald R.; Foss, Scott E. (eds.). The Evolution of Artiodactyls. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 59–84.
  5. ↑ Orliac, Maeva; Gilissen, Emmanuel (2012). "Virtual endocranial cast of earliest Eocene Diacodexis (Artiodactyla, Mammalia) and morphological diversity of early artiodactyl brains". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 279 (1743): 3670–3677. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1156. PMC   3415922 . PMID   22764165.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Cuesta, Miguel-Ángel; Badiola, Ainara (2009). "Duerotherium sudrei gen. et sp. nov., a new anoplotheriine artiodactyl from the Middle Eocene of the Iberian Peninsula". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 29 (1): 303–308. Bibcode:2009JVPal..29..303C. doi:10.1671/039.029.0110. JSTOR   20491092. S2CID   55546022.
  7. 1 2 Weppe, Romain (2022). Déclin des artiodactyles endémiques européens, autopsie d'une extinction (Thesis) (in French). University of Montpellier.
  8. 1 2 Hooker, Jerry J. (2007). "Bipedal browsing adaptations of the unusual Late Eocene–earliest Oligocene tylopod Anoplotherium (Artiodactyla, Mammalia)". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 151 (3): 609–659. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00352.x .
  9. 1 2 Luccisano, Vincent; Sudre, Jean; Lihoreau, Fabrice (2020). "Revision of the Eocene artiodactyls (Mammalia, Placentalia) from Aumelas and Saint-Martin-de-Londres (Montpellier limestones, Hérault, France) questions the early European artiodactyl radiation". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 18 (19): 1631–1656. Bibcode:2020JSPal..18.1631L. doi:10.1080/14772019.2020.1799253. S2CID   221468663.
  10. 1 2 Weppe, Romain; Blondel, Cécile; Vianey-Liaud, Monique; Escarguel, Gilles; Pélissié, Thierry; Antoine, Pierre-Olivier; Orliac, Maëva Judith (2020). "Cainotheriidae (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) from Dams (Quercy, SW France): phylogenetic relationships and evolution around the Eocene–Oligocene transition (MP19–MP21)" (PDF). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 18 (7): 541–572. Bibcode:2020JSPal..18..541W. doi:10.1080/14772019.2019.1645754. S2CID   202026238.
  11. ↑ Weppe, Romain; Blondel, Cécile; Vianey-Liaud, Monique; Pélissié, Thierry; Orliac, Maëva Judith (2020). "A new Cainotherioidea (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) from Palembert (Quercy, SW France): Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of the dental pattern of Cainotheriidae". Palaeontologia Electronica (23(3):a54). doi: 10.26879/1081 . S2CID   229490410.
  12. ↑ Gentry, Alan W.; Hooker, Jerry J. (1988). "The phylogeny of the Artiodactyla". The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods: Volume 2: Mammals (The Systematics Association Special Volume, No. 35B). Oxford University Press. pp. 235–272.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 Viret, Jean (1961). "Artiodactyla". Traitè de Palèontologie. Masson. pp. 887–1104.
  14. ↑ von Zittel, Karl Alfred (1925). Schlosser, Max (ed.). Text-Book of Paleontology. Volume III. Mammalia. Macmillan and Co. Limited. pp. 179–180.
  15. ↑ Lihoreau, Fabrice; Boisserie, Jean-Renaud; Viriot, Laurent; Brunet, Michel (2006). "Anthracothere dental anatomy reveals a late Miocene Chado-Libyan bioprovince". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103 (23): 8763–8767. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103.8763L. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603126103 . PMC   1482652 . PMID   16723392.
  16. ↑ de Beaumont, Gérard (1963). "Deux importants restes d'Anoplotheriidae (Artiodactyla) des Phosphorites du Quercy". Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae. 56 (2).
  17. ↑ Sudre, Jean (1974). "D'important restes de Diplobune minor Filhol à Itardies (Quercy)". Palaeovertebrata. 6: 47–54.
  18. ↑ Sudre, Jean; Martinez, Jean-Noël (1995). "The astragalus of Paleogene artiodactyls: comparative morphology, variability and prediction of body mass". Lethaia. 28 (3): 197–209. Bibcode:1995Letha..28..197M. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1995.tb01423.x.
  19. 1 2 Sudre, Jean (1982). "Interprétation de la denture et description des éléments du squelette appendiculaire de l'espèce Diplobune minor (Filhol 1877); apports à la connaissance de l'anatomie des Anoplotheriinae Bonaparte 1850". In Mazin, J.M.; Salmon, E. (eds.). Actes du Symposium paléontologique Georges Cuvier, Montbéliard – France, 1982: communications données à l'occasion du cent cinquantième anniversaire de la mort de Georges Cuvier, du 25 octobre au 28 octobre 1982, au Musée du Château. Le Musée du Château. pp. 439–458.
  20. ↑ Métais, Grégoire (2014). On the "thumb" of anoplotheriins: a 3D comparative study of the hand of Anoplotherium and Diplobune. Swiss Geoscience Meeting 2014.
  21. ↑ Cladellas, Maria Lourdes Casanovas; Santafé Llopis, José Vicente (1982). "Icnofauna oligocena de Agramunt (Lérida, Espaia)". Acta Geologica Hispanica. 17 (1–2): 113–119.
  22. ↑ Maitre, Elodie (2014). "Western European middle Eocene to early Oligocene Chiroptera: systematics, phylogeny and palaeoecology based on new material from the Quercy (France)". Swiss Journal of Palaeontology . 133 (2): 141–242. Bibcode:2014SwJP..133..141M. doi: 10.1007/s13358-014-0069-3 . S2CID   84066785.
  23. ↑ Blondel, Cécile (2001). "The Eocene-Oligocene ungulates from Western Europe and their environment" (PDF). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 168 (1–2): 125–139. Bibcode:2001PPP...168..125B. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00252-2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 August 2017. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  24. ↑ Bai, Bin; Wang, Yuan-Qing; Theodor, Jessica M.; Meng, Jin (2023). "Small artiodactyls with tapir-like teeth from the middle Eocene of the Erlian Basin, Inner Mongolia, China". Frontiers in Earth Science. 11: 1117911. Bibcode:2023FrEaS..1117911B. doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1117911 .
  25. ↑ Kostopoulos, Dimitris S.; Koufos, George D.; Christanis, Kimon (2012). "On some anthracotheriid (Artiodactyla, Mammalia) remains from northern Greece: comments on the palaeozoogeography and phylogeny of Elomeryx". Swiss Journal of Palaeontology . 131 (2): 303–315. Bibcode:2012SwJP..131..303K. doi:10.1007/s13358-012-0041-z. S2CID   195363034.
  26. ↑ Badiola, Ainara; Perales-Gogenola, Leire; Astibia, Humberto; Suberbiola, Xabier Pereda (2022). "A synthesis of Eocene equoids (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Iberian Peninsula: new signs of endemism". Historical Biology. 34 (8): 1623–1631. Bibcode:2022HBio...34.1623B. doi:10.1080/08912963.2022.2060098. S2CID   248164842.
  27. ↑ Marigó, Judit; Susanna, Ivette; Minwer-Barakat, Raef; Malapeira, Joan Madurell; Moyà-Solà, Salvador; Casanovas-Vilar, Isaac; Gimenez, Jose Maria Robles; Alba, David M. (2014). "The primate fossil record in the Iberian Peninsula". Journal of Iberian Geology. 40 (1): 179–211. doi: 10.5209/rev_JIGE.2014.v40.n1.44094 .
  28. 1 2 Solé, Floréal; Fischer, Valentin; Le Verger, Kévin; Mennecart, Bastien; Speijer, Robert P.; Peigné, Stéphane; Smith, Thierry (2022). "Evolution of European carnivorous mammal assemblages through the Paleogene". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 135 (4): 734–753. doi:10.1093/biolinnean/blac002.
  29. ↑ Dawson, Mary R. (2003). "Paleogene rodents of Eurasia". Distribution and migration of tertiary mammals in Eurasia. Vol. 10. pp. 97–127.
  30. ↑ Rivals, Florent; Belyaev, Ruslan I.; Basova, Vera B.; Prilepskaya, Natalya E. (2023). "Hogs, hippos or bears? Paleodiet of European Oligocene anthracotheres and entelodonts". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 611: 111363. Bibcode:2023PPP...61111363R. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2022.111363 . S2CID   254801829.
  31. ↑ Becker, Damien (2009). "Earliest record of rhinocerotoids (Mammalia: Perissodactyla) from Switzerland: systematics and biostratigraphy". Swiss Journal of Geosciences . 102 (3): 489–504. doi: 10.1007/s00015-009-1330-4 . S2CID   67817430.
  32. ↑ Hooker, Jerry J.; Collinson, Margaret E.; Sille, Nicholas P. (2004). "Eocene–Oligocene mammalian faunal turnover in the Hampshire Basin, UK: calibration to the global time scale and the major cooling event" (PDF). Journal of the Geological Society. 161 (2): 161–172. Bibcode:2004JGSoc.161..161H. doi:10.1144/0016-764903-091. S2CID   140576090. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 August 2023. Retrieved 31 August 2023.
  33. ↑ Solé, Floréal; Fischer, Fischer; Denayer, Julien; Speijer, Robert P.; Fournier, Morgane; Le Verger, Kévin; Ladevèze, Sandrine; Folie, Annelise; Smith, Thierry (2020). "The upper Eocene-Oligocene carnivorous mammals from the Quercy Phosphorites (France) housed in Belgian collections". Geologica Belgica. 24 (1–2): 1–16. doi: 10.20341/gb.2020.006 . S2CID   224860287.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.