Amphimerycidae

Last updated

Amphimerycidae
Temporal range: Middle Eocene - Early Oligocene 43.5–32.5  Ma
Amphimeryx murinus-Montmatre-Paris-France.tif
Amphimeryx murinus mandible, National Museum of Natural History, France
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Artiodactyla
Family:† Amphimerycidae
Stehlin, 1910
Genera

Amphimerycidae is an extinct family of artiodactyls that was endemic to western Europe that lived from the Middle Eocene to the Early Oligocene. With a taxonomic history extending as far back as 1804, the family was formally recognized by the Swiss palaeontologist Hans Georg Stehlin in 1910 and contains two genera: Amphimeryx and Pseudamphimeryx . Both amphimerycid genera are very similar to each other in terms of skull and dental anatomy but do have specific differences from each other. Both genera are best known from their fused cuboid bone and navicular bone, which together make up a single "cubonavicular bone" of the hind legs. This trait had long been used in support of the idea that they were ruminants by taxonomists. However, their classification to the Ruminantia had also been rejected by other taxonomists later on due to differences in dentition; the systematic position of the Amphimerycidae and close relatives in relation to the wider Artiodactyla (or Cetartiodactyla), as a result, is unclear.

Contents

The Amphimerycidae lived in western Europe, which at the time was an archipelago that was isolated from the rest of Eurasia. This meant that it lived in a tropical-subtropical environment with various other faunas that also evolved with strong levels of endemism. Pseudamphimeryx was the first-occurring genus but then was replaced by Amphimeryx in the Late Eocene. Amphimeryx lived up to the Early Oligocene, having apparently briefly survived after the Grande Coupure turnover event.

Taxonomy

Drawing of a mandible of "Anoplotherium murinum" (= Amphimeryx murinus), 1822) Anoplotherium Amphimeryx murinus mandible 1822.jpg
Drawing of a mandible of " Anoplotherium murinum" (= Amphimeryx murinus), 1822)

The earliest history of the Amphimerycidae was in 1804 when the French naturalist Georges Cuvier erected Anoplotherium minimum in 1804, stating that unlike with other species assigned to Anoplotherium (A. commune, A. medium, and A. minus), A. minimum lacked known postcranial fossil evidence. [1] In 1822, he emended A. minimum to A. murinum (noting that the species still lacked postcranial evidence unlike with other Anoplotherium species) and classified it to the subgenus Dichobune . [a] [2] In 1848, the French palaeontologist Auguste Pomel erected the genus Amphimeryx for the reclassified species A. murinus, arguing that it was close to ruminants in affinity. [4]

In a palaeontology textbook dating back to 1891–1893, the German palaeontologist Karl Alfred von Zittel classified Amphimeryx to the artiodactyl family Xiphodontidae. [5] Swiss palaeontologist Hans Georg Stehlin reclassified it and the newly recognized Pseudamphimeryx to their own family, the Amphimerycidae, in 1910. He also noted that while Amphimeryx was long thought thought to have been closely related to Xiphodon , the possibility that both the Amphimerycidae and Xiphodon independently acquired similar anatomical traits cannot be eliminated. [6] The French palaeontologist Jean Viret gave a formal diagnosis of the Amphimerycidae in 1961. [7]

Classification

Because of some similar anatomical traits of the amphimerycids to those of ruminants (like the Java mouse-deer (Tragulus javanicus), pictured), they were previously considered ruminants by biologists. Today, their evolutionary relationship to ruminants and other artiodactyls proves unclear. Tragulus javanicus.jpg
Because of some similar anatomical traits of the amphimerycids to those of ruminants (like the Java mouse-deer ( Tragulus javanicus), pictured), they were previously considered ruminants by biologists. Today, their evolutionary relationship to ruminants and other artiodactyls proves unclear.

For much of the taxonomy history of the amphimerycids, their placements within or outside the Ruminantia had been disputed and still remains so today. [8] In 1941, the American palaeontologist Edwin H. Colbert wrote about evolutionary affinities of fossil and extant ruminants, comparing Archaeomeryx to other artiodactyl genera like Amphimeryx, Hypertragulus , Gelocus , and Tragulus . He said that fossil evidence of Amphimeryx was not complete during his time of study but suggested that it may have been a primitive member of clade Tragulina but that Archaeomeryx was overall more primitive than it. He then classified Amphimeryx to its own ruminant superfamily Amphimerycoidea, separating it from other traguline superfamilies like the Hypertraguloidea and Traguloidea. [9] His classification was followed by another American palaeontologist George Gaylord Simpson in 1945. [10]

In 1961, Viret reclassified the Amphimerycidae and the Xiphodontidae into the artiodactyl clade Ancodonta, therefore removing the former from the Ruminantia. Similarly, American palaeontologists S. David Webb and Beryl E. Taylor in 1980 argued that the Amphimerycidae had historically been tied to the Ruminantia due to postcranial convergences but otherwise had more in common with xiphodonts than ruminants in terms of dentition. However, they chose to tentatively reclassify the Xiphodontidae and Amphimerycidae to the Tylopoda instead, although they did also suggest the possibility of them being a sister group to ruminants. On the other hand, in 1997, the American palaeontologists Malcolm McKenna and Susan K. Bell reclassified the Amphimerycidae into the Ruminantia. [7] [11] [12] [8]

According to Jörg Erfurt and Grégoire Métais in 2007, the similarities of amphimerycids with ruminants are thought to have been an instance of parallel evolution, in which amphimerycids and ruminants independently gained similar traits. [8] [13] While amphimerycids have typically been excluded from the Ruminantia due to dental characteristics, it does not eliminate the possibility of them being sister taxa to ruminants by the latter independently gaining longer legs and more selenodont (crescent-shaped) dentition. [14] Its affinities, along with those of other endemic European artiodactyls, are unclear; the Amphimerycidae, Anoplotheriidae, Xiphodontidae, Mixtotheriidae, and Cainotheriidae have been determined to be closer to either tylopods (i.e. camelids and merycoidodonts) or ruminants. Different phylogenetic analyses have produced different results for the "derived" selenodont Eocene European artiodactyl families, making it uncertain whether they were closer to the Tylopoda or Ruminantia. [13] [15] [16]

In an article published in 2019, Romain Weppe et al. conducted a phylogenetic analysis on the Cainotherioidea within the Artiodactyla based on mandibular and dental characteristics, specifically in terms of relationships with artiodactyls of the Palaeogene. The results retrieved that the superfamily was closely related to the Mixtotheriidae and Anoplotheriidae. They determined that the Cainotheriidae, Robiacinidae, Anoplotheriidae, and Mixtotheriidae formed a clade that was the sister group to the Ruminantia while Tylopoda, along with the Amphimerycidae and Xiphodontidae split earlier in the tree. [16] The phylogenetic tree used for the journal and another published work about the cainotherioids is outlined below: [17]

In 2020, Vincent Luccisano et al. created a phylogenetic tree of the basal artiodactyls, a majority endemic to western Europe, from the Palaeogene. In one clade, the "bunoselenodont endemic European" Mixtotheriidae, Anoplotheriidae, Xiphodontidae, Amphimerycidae, Cainotheriidae, and Robiacinidae are grouped together with the Ruminantia. The phylogenetic tree as produced by the authors is shown below: [15]

In 2022, Weppe conducted a phylogenetic analysis in his academic thesis regarding Palaeogene artiodactyl lineages, focusing most specifically on the endemic European families. One large monophyletic set consisted of the Hyperdichobuninae, Amphimerycidae, Xiphodontidae, and Cainotherioidea based on dental synapomorphies, of which the hyperdichobunines are paraphyletic in relation to the other clades. In terms of the amphimerycids, while the clade consisting of P. renevieri and A. murinus was recovered as a sister group to the other endemic artiodactyl clades, the placement of P. schlosseri has rendered the Amphimerycidae paraphyletic in relation to the derived amphimerycid species and other families. He argued that the Amphimerycidae thus needs a systemic revision for which P. schlosseri would be assigned to a new genus and removed from the Amphimerycidae. [13]

Description

Pseudamphimeryx renevieri mandible, Natural History Museum of Basel Pseudamphimeryx renevieri.jpg
Pseudamphimeryx renevieri mandible, Natural History Museum of Basel

The Amphimerycidae is a family of small-sized artiodactyls whose species ranged in weight from 0.4 kg (0.88 lb) to 1.5 kg (3.3 lb) total. [18] Amphimerycids are defined in part as having an elongated snout and large orbits that are widened in their backs. [8] The dental formula of the Amphimerycidae is 3.1.4.33.1.4.3 for a total of 44 teeth, consistent with the primitive dental formula for early-middle Palaeogene placental mammals. [19] [20] The incisors (I/i) are shovel-shaped, have sharp edges on their crowns, and have horizontal positions in relation to the dental row. [21] The canines (C/c) are incisiform (incisor form) and therefore differ little with the incisors themselves. The premolars (P/p) are elongated and may generally be separated by diastemata (gaps between teeth). The lower premolars have three lobes, or developed areas on their crowns. The upper molars (M/m) are more developed in form and are generally subtriangular in shape, although some may be more rectangular. They have five crescent-shaped (selenodont) tubercles and sometimes a partial hypocone cusp that may be present in all species. [19] [8] Amphimerycids differ from ruminants, particularly the basal clade Tragulina, in the retentions of their first premolars and their high levels of specialization in their selenodonty and number of cusps in their molars. [22] Their dentitions more closely resemble those of xiphodonts or dacrytheriines than of ruminants. [8] The overall selenodonty and brachyodonty (low-crowned teeth) of amphimerycids suggest that they were adapted towards folivorous (leaf-eating) dietary habits. [18] Pseudamphimeryx and Amphimeryx, both known by multiple skull specimens, have very similar forms but differ based on a few characteristics. [21] Amphimeryx is distinguished from Pseudamphimeryx in part by the more well-developed occipital crest present on the snout of the latter. [23] While the peak of the skull's top of Amphimeryx slopes down to its front area, that of Pseudamphimeryx appears initially concave at the occipital crest's front, ascends slightly, and then finally slopes down. [21]

Restoration of A. murinus based on known fossil material Amphimeryx life reconstruction.png
Restoration of A. murinus based on known fossil material

Both amphimerycid genera have especially prominent occipital and sagittal crests, the latter of which divides into two less prominent branches behind the fronto-parietal suture that extend up to the supraorbital foramen. The frontal bones of both amphimerycid genera are large plus flat, being particularly sizeable in their supraorbital portions; this trait is more pronounced in Amphimeryx. The lacrimal bone of both amphimerycids, but especially in Amphimeryx, has an extensive pars facialis and is quadrangular in shape, narrowing at its front. The orbit is large, is positioned back in relation to the overall skull, is wide at its back area, and is more curved at its upper compared to lower edge. There is no difference between both amphimerycids in terms of the orbits, suggesting based on their morphologies that the snouts of both genera are elongated. The optic foramen, located in the sphenoid bone, extends more forward in Amphimeryx than in Pseudamphimeryx. While the nasal bone is not as well-preserved in Amphimeryx fossils, the frontonasal suture is implied to have formed a W shape on the skull's upper surface like that of Pseudamphimeryx. Both amphimerycid genera also have similar, although not identical, medial positions of the infraorbital foramen in the maxilla. The palatine bones of Amphimeryx and Pseudamphimeryx are narrower at their front than back ends. [21]

Both amphimerycid genera are best known by the "cubonavicular" bone (fused cuboid bone and navicular bone of the hind legs) recorded in multiple species; the morphology of the astragalus of P. renevieri further attests to anatomical support of the fused bone. [8] [24] This trait has also been recorded in ruminants, suggesting that the amphimerycids and ruminants independently acquired the trait in an instance of parallel evolution. [25] [8] The primitive state of the astragalus sets Amphimeryx apart from ruminants; the approximately equal sizes of its trochleas and more rounded edge of its sustentacular facet also sets the genus apart from the Cainotheriidae. [26] In Amphimeryx, the metatarsal digits III and IV are elongated and partially fused to each other while the side digits II and V are greatly reduced to small but needlelike forms. Digit III measures 50 mm (2.0 in) long while digit II is no more than 14 mm (0.55 in) long. [8] [19] These traits are similarly recorded in derived ruminants, which have tetradactyl (four-toed) feet, absent digit I, reduced digits II and V, and fused digits III and IV that make up the cannon bone (the now-extinct primitive ruminants had pentadactyl (five-toed) feet, unreduced digits II and V, and unfused digits III and IV). [22] [27] Like other artiodactyls with only two elongated digits in each foot (digits III and IV), [28] Amphimeryx was functionally didactyl, meaning that it walked only on its two elongated toes per foot. [26]

Palaeoecology

Middle Eocene

Palaeogeography of Europe and Asia during the Middle Eocene with possible artiodactyl and perissodactyl dispersal routes. Middle Eocene Paleogeography Tethys Dispersals.jpg
Palaeogeography of Europe and Asia during the Middle Eocene with possible artiodactyl and perissodactyl dispersal routes.

For much of the Eocene, a hothouse climate climate with humid, tropical environments with consistently high precipitations prevailed. Modern mammalian orders including the Perissodactyla, Artiodactyla, and Primates (or the suborder Euprimates) appeared already by the Early Eocene, diversifying rapidly and developing dentitions specialized for folivory. The omnivorous forms mostly either switched to folivorous diets or went extinct by the Middle Eocene (47–37 Ma) along with the archaic "condylarths". By the Late Eocene (approx. 37–33 mya), most of the ungulate form dentitions shifted from bunodont (or rounded) cusps to cutting ridges (i.e. lophs) for folivorous diets. [29] [30]

Land connections between western Europe and North America were interrupted around 53 Ma. From the Early Eocene up until the Grande Coupure extinction event (56–33.9 mya), western Eurasia was separated into three landmasses: western Europe (an archipelago), Balkanatolia (in-between the Paratethys Sea of the north and the Neotethys Ocean of the south), and eastern Eurasia. [31] The Holarctic mammalian faunas of western Europe were therefore mostly isolated from other landmasses including Greenland, Africa, and eastern Eurasia, allowing for endemism to develop. [30] Therefore, the European mammals of the Late Eocene (MP17–MP20 of the Mammal Palaeogene zones) were mostly descendants of endemic Middle Eocene groups. [32]

The Amphimerycidae, and by extent the first genus Pseudamphimeryx, is first recorded by the appearance of P. schlosseri in the Swiss locality of Egerkingen α + β, dating back to MP14. [33] [34] [35] Both families would have coexisted with perissodactyls (Palaeotheriidae, Lophiodontidae, and Hyrachyidae), non-endemic artiodactyls (Dichobunidae and Tapirulidae), endemic European artiodactyls (Choeropotamidae, Cebochoeridae, and Anoplotheriidae), and primates (Adapidae). [18] [33] [36] The stratigraphic ranges of the early species of Amphimeryx also overlapped with metatherians (Herpetotheriidae), cimolestans (Pantolestidae, Paroxyclaenidae), rodents (Ischyromyidae, Theridomyoidea, Gliridae), eulipotyphlans, bats, apatotherians, carnivoraformes (Miacidae), and hyaenodonts (Hyainailourinae, Proviverrinae). [34] Other MP13-MP14 sites have also yielded fossils of turtles and crocodylomorphs, [37] and MP13 sites are stratigraphically the latest to have yielded remains of the bird clades Gastornithidae and Palaeognathae. [38]

The unit MP16 records the appearances of P. renevieri and P. pavloviae, both of which are recorded from the MP16 French locality of Robiac. Other mammal genera that cooccur in the site include the herpetotheriids Amphiperatherium and Peratherium , apatemyid Heterohyus , nyctitheriid Saturninia , rodents ( Glamys , Elfomys , Plesiarctomys , Ailuravus , Remys ), omomyids Pseudoloris and Necrolemur, adapid Adapis , hyaenodonts Paroxyaena and Cynohyaenodon , carnivoraformes Paramiacis and Quercygale , palaeotheres ( Propalaeotherium , Anchilophus , Plagiolophus , Pachynolophus , Palaeotherium ), lophiodont Lophiodon , hyrachyid Chasmotherium , cebochoerids Acotherulum and Cebochoerus , choeropotamid Choeropotamus , tapirulid Tapirulus , anoplotheriids ( Dacrytherium , Catodontherium , Robiatherium ), robiacinid Robiacina , and xiphodonts (Xiphodon, Dichodon , Haplomeryx ). [34]

After MP16, a faunal turnover occurred, marking the disappearances of the lophiodonts and European hyrachyids as well as the extinctions of all European crocodylomorphs except for the alligatoroid Diplocynodon . [33] [37] [39] [40] The causes of the faunal turnover have been attributed to a shift from humid and highly tropical environments to drier and more temperate forests with open areas and more abrasive vegetation. The surviving herbivorous faunas shifted their dentitions and dietary strategies accordingly to adapt to abrasive and seasonal vegetation. [41] [42] However, the environments were still subhumid and covered by subtropical evergreen forests. The Palaeotheriidae was the sole remaining European perissodactyl group, and frugivorous-folivorous or purely folivorous artiodactyls became the dominant group in western Europe. [43] [18]

Late Eocene and Early Oligocene

The Late Eocene unit MP17 records as many as four total species of Pseudamphimeryx: P. renevieri, P. havloviae, P. salesmei, and P. hantonensis. [35] [25] MP17a confirms the continued occurrence of P. renevieri in the French locality of Fons 4; MP17b is the latest unit that Pseudamphimeryx occurs and records both P. renevieri and P. pavloviae from another French locality of Perrière. Starting at MP18, Amphimeryx makes its first appearance and therefore succeeds Pseudamphimeryx. [34] [35] The MP18 locality of La Débruge of France indicates that A. murinus coexisted with a wide variety of mammals, namely the herpetotheriid Peratherium, rodents ( Blainvillimys , Theridomys , Plesiarctomys, Glamys), hyaenodonts ( Hyaenodon and Pterodon ), amphicyonid Cynodictis , palaeotheres (Plagiolophus, Anchilophus, Palaeotherium), dichobunid Dichobune, choeropotamid Choeropotamus, cebochoerids Cebochoerus and Acotherulum, anoplotheriids ( Anoplotherium , Diplobune , Dacrytherium), tapirulid Tapirulus, xiphodonts Xiphodon and Dichodon, cainothere Oxacron , and the anthracothere Elomeryx . [34]

MP20 marks the last known appearance of A. murinus, but the species A. riparius is apparently recorded solely from the MP21 French locality of Ronzon. Many other artiodactyl genera from western Europe disappeared as a result of the Grande Coupure extinction event, the Ronzon locality indicates that the Amphimerycidae may have survived past the event but went extinct not long after. [8] [18] The causes of the extinctions of many other mammals in western Europe have been attributed to negative interactions with immigrant faunas (competition, predations), environmental changes from cooling climates, or some combination of the two. [44] [45]

Notes

  1. ↑ A. minus was emended to A. leporinum by Cuvier the same year and has later been considered a species of Dichobune as a distinct genus. [2] [3]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Artiodactyl</span> Order of mammals

Artiodactyls are placental mammals belonging to the order Artiodactyla. Typically, they are ungulates which bear weight equally on two of their five toes. The other three toes are either present, absent, vestigial, or pointing posteriorly. By contrast, most perissodactyls bear weight on an odd number of the five toes. Another difference between the two orders is that many artiodactyls digest plant cellulose in one or more stomach chambers rather than in their intestine. Molecular biology, along with new fossil discoveries, has found that cetaceans fall within this taxonomic branch, being most closely related to hippopotamuses. Some modern taxonomists thus apply the name Cetartiodactyla to this group, while others opt to include cetaceans within the existing name of Artiodactyla. Some researchers use "even-toed ungulates" to exclude cetaceans and only include terrestrial artiodactyls, making the term paraphyletic in nature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tylopoda</span> Suborder of mammals

Tylopoda is a suborder of terrestrial herbivorous even-toed ungulates belonging to the order Artiodactyla. They are found in the wild in their native ranges of South America and Asia, while Australian feral camels are introduced. The group has a long fossil history in North America and Eurasia. Tylopoda appeared during the Eocene around 50 million years ago.

<i>Palaeotherium</i> Extinct genus of mammals

Palaeotherium is an extinct genus of equoid that lived in Europe and possibly the Middle East from the Middle Eocene to the Early Oligocene. It is the type genus of the Palaeotheriidae, a group exclusive to the Palaeogene that was closest in relation to the Equidae, which contains horses plus their closest relatives and ancestors. Fossils of Palaeotherium were first described in 1782 by the French naturalist Robert de Lamanon and then closely studied by another French naturalist, Georges Cuvier, after 1798. Cuvier erected the genus in 1804 and recognized multiple species based on overall fossil sizes and forms. As one of the first fossil genera to be recognized with official taxonomic authority, it is recognized as an important milestone within the field of palaeontology. The research by early naturalists on Palaeotherium contributed to the developing ideas of evolution, extinction, and succession and demonstrating the morphological diversity of different species within one genus.

<i>Anoplotherium</i> Extinct genus of endemic Paleogene European artiodactyls

Anoplotherium is the type genus of the extinct Palaeogene artiodactyl family Anoplotheriidae, which was endemic to Western Europe. It lived from the Late Eocene to the earliest Oligocene. It was the fifth fossil mammal genus to be described with official taxonomic authority, with a history extending back to 1804 when its fossils from Montmartre in Paris, France were first described by the French naturalist Georges Cuvier. Discoveries of incomplete skeletons of A. commune in 1807 led Cuvier to thoroughly describe unusual features for which there are no modern analogues. His drawn skeletal and muscle reconstructions of A. commune in 1812 were amongst the first instances of anatomical reconstructions based on fossil evidence. Cuvier's contributions to palaeontology based on his works on the genus were revolutionary for the field, not only proving the developing ideas of extinction and ecological succession but also paving the way for subfields such as palaeoneurology. Today, there are four known species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Xiphodontidae</span> Extinct family of mammals

Xiphodontidae is an extinct family of herbivorous even-toed ungulates, endemic to Europe during the Eocene 40.4—33.9 million years ago, existing for about 7.5 million years. Paraxiphodon suggests that they survived into the Lower Oligocene, at least.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anoplotheriidae</span> Extinct family of mammals

Anoplotheriidae is an extinct family of artiodactyl ungulates. They were endemic to Europe during the Eocene and Oligocene epochs about 44—30 million years ago. Its name is derived from the Ancient Greek: ἂνοπλος ("unarmed") and θήριον ("beast"), translating as "unarmed beast".

Duerotherium is an extinct genus of artiodactyl that lived during the Middle Eocene and is only known from the Iberian Peninsula. The genus is a member of the family Anoplotheriidae and the subfamily Anoplotheriinae, and contains one species, D. sudrei. Like other anoplotheriids, it was endemic to Western Europe. The genus was described based on a left fragment of a maxilla from the Mazaterón Formation of the Duero Basin, from which its name derives, in 2009. Its dentition is mostly typical of the Anoplotheriinae but differs from related genera in the elongated and triangular third upper premolar and traits of the molars. It is thought to have been part of an endemic fauna that evolved in the Iberian Peninsula during the Middle Eocene, when climates were subtropical.

<i>Xiphodon</i> Extinct genus of endemic Palaeogene European artiodactyls

Xiphodon is the type genus of the extinct Palaeogene artiodactyl family Xiphodontidae. It, like other xiphodonts, was endemic to Western Europe and lived from the middle Eocene up to the earliest Oligocene. Fossils from Montmartre in Paris, France that belonged to X. gracilis were first described by the French naturalist Georges Cuvier in 1804. Although he assigned the species to Anoplotherium, he recognized that it differed from A. commune by its dentition and limb bones, later moving it to its own subgenus in 1822. Xiphodon was promoted to genus rank by other naturalists in later decades. It is today defined by the type species X. gracilis and two other species, X. castrensis and X. intermedium.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cainotheriidae</span> Extinct family of mammals

Cainotheriidae is an extinct family of artiodactyls known from the Late Eocene to Middle Miocene of Europe. They are mostly found preserved in karstic deposits.

<i>Dichodon</i> (mammal) Extinct genus of endemic Palaeogene European artiodactyls

Dichodon is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the family Xiphodontidae. It was endemic to Western Europe and lived from the middle Eocene up to the earliest Oligocene. The genus was first erected by the British naturalist Richard Owen in 1848 based on dental remains from the fossil beds in Hordle, England. He noticed similar dentitions to contemporary artiodactyls like those of the Anoplotheriidae and Dichobunidae and references the name of the genus Dichobune. Eventually, it was found to be more closely related to Xiphodon and now includes 11 species, although one of them may be synonymous.

Research history of <i>Anoplotherium</i> Studies of a genus of endemic Paleogene European artiodactyls

The research history of Anoplotherium spans back to 1804 when Georges Cuvier first described the fossils of this extinct artiodactyl and named the genus after describing Palaeotherium, making it one of the first fossil mammal genera to be described as well as having one of the earliest official taxonomic authorities. It was also amongst the first fossil genera to be reconstructed by drawings and biomechanics. Subsequent descriptions of fossil evidence by Cuvier are also said to have been some of the earliest instances of palaeoneurology and palaeopathology. Anoplotherium was a significant find in palaeontological history and was once an iconic element of text and classroom sources of palaeontology, geology, and natural history. Today, it has a lessened cultural status compared to the 19th century as a result of public interest in Mesozoic dinosaurs or Neogene-Quaternary mammals, but it is still regularly acknowledged in sources of the history of palaeontology.

<i>Diplobune</i> Extinct genus of endemic Palaeogene European artiodactyls

Diplobune is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the family Anoplotheriidae. It was endemic to Europe and lived from the late Eocene to the early Oligocene. The genus was first erected as a subgenus of Dichobune by Ludwig Rütimeyer in 1862 based on his hypothesis of the taxon being a transitional form between "Anoplotherium" secundaria, previously erected by Georges Cuvier in 1822, and Dichobune. He based the genus etymology off of the two-pointed pillarlike shapes of the lower molars, which had since been a diagnosis of it. However, in 1870, Diplobune was elevated to genus rank by Oscar Fraas, who recognized that Diplobune was a distinct genus related to Anoplotherium and not Dichobune. After several revisions of the anoplotheriids, there are currently four known species of which D. minor is the type species.

<i>Dacrytherium</i> Extinct genus of endemic Palaeogene European artiodactyls

Dacrytherium is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the family Anoplotheriidae. It occurred from the Middle to Late Eocene of Western Europe and is the type genus of the subfamily Dacrytheriinae, the older of the two anoplotheriid subfamilies. Dacrytherium was first erected in 1876 by the French palaeontologist Henri Filhol, who recognised in his studies that it had dentition similar to the anoplotheriids Anoplotherium and Diplobune but differed from them by a deep preorbital fossa and a lacrimal fossa, the latter of which is where the genus name derives from. D. ovinum, originally classified in Dichobune, is the type species of Dacrytherium. Henri Filhol named D. elegans in 1884, and Hans Georg Stehlin named the species D. priscum and D. saturnini in 1910.

<i>Catodontherium</i> Extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls

Catodontherium is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the family Anoplotheriidae. It was endemic to Western Europe and had a temporal range exclusive to the middle Eocene, although its earliest appearance depends on whether C. argentonicum is truly a species of Catodontherium. It was first named Catodus by the French palaeontologist Charles Depéret in 1906, who created two species for the genus and later changed the genus name to Catodontherium in 1908. The Swiss palaeontologist Hans Georg Stehlin renamed one species and classified two other newly erected species to Catodontherium in 1910. Today, there are four known species, although two remain questionable in genus placement.

Ephelcomenus is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the Anoplotheriidae that were endemic to Western Europe. It contains one species E. filholi, which was first described by Richard Lydekker in 1889 but eventually classified to its own genus by the Swiss palaeontologist Johannes Hürzeler in 1938. It has an uncertain stratigraphic range, but some sources suggest that it was present in the Oligocene after the Grande Coupure turnover event of western Europe.

Robiatherium is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls containing one species R. cournovense. The genus name derives from the locality of Robiac in France where some of its fossil were described plus the Greek θήρ/therium meaning "beast" or "wild animal". It was known only from the middle Eocene and, like other anoplotheriids, was endemic to Western Europe. The genus was erected by Jean Sudre in 1988 for a species originally attributed to the xiphodont genus Paraxiphodon in 1978. Robiatherium had dentitions typical of the subfamily Anoplotheriinae, differing from other genera by specific differences in the molars. It is one of the earliest-appearing anoplotheriine species in the fossil record as well as the earliest to have appeared in Central Europe.

<i>Mixtotherium</i> Extinct genus of endemic Palaeogene European artiodactyls

Mixtotherium is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the monotypic family Mixtotheriidae. Known informally as mixtotheriids or mixtotheres, these artiodactyls were endemic to western Europe and occurred from the middle to late Eocene. The genus and type species were both first established by the French naturalist Henri Filhol in 1880. Several species are well known by good skull fossils, which were informative enough to allow for classifications of the species to their own family. The Mixtotheriidae, first recognized by Helga Sharpe Pearson in 1927, is currently known by 7 valid species, although M. priscum is thought by several authors to be synonymous with M. gresslyi. The affinities of the Mixtotheriidae in relation to other artiodactyl families is uncertain, but it is currently thought to have been related to the Cainotherioidea and Anoplotheriidae.

Haplomeryx is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the family Xiphodontidae. It was endemic to Western Europe and lived from the middle Eocene up to the earliest Oligocene. Haplomeryx was first established as a genus by the German naturalist Max Schlosser in 1886 based on a molar tooth set from Quercy Phosphorites deposits. Three additional species were erected and classified to the xiphodontid genus while one other species, first recognized in 1822, was tentatively classified to it and remains unresolved in affinity.

<i>Amphimeryx</i> Extinct genus of endemic Palaeogene European artiodactyls

Amphimeryx is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the Amphimerycidae that was endemic to the central region of western Europe and lived from the Late Eocene to the Early Oligocene. It was erected in 1848 by the French palaeontologist Auguste Pomel, who argued that its dentition was roughly similar to those of ruminants. Hence, the etymology of the genus name means "near ruminant," of which it derives from the ancient Greek words ἀμφί (near) and μήρυξ (ruminant). The type species A. murinus was previously recognized as a species of Dichobune by the French palaeontologist Georges Cuvier in 1822 before its eventual reclassification to its own genus. Two other species A. collotarsus and A. riparius are recognized also today although the former may be synonymous with A. murinus while the latter is known solely by a now-lost fossil specimen.

<i>Pseudamphimeryx</i> Extinct genus of endemic Palaeogene European artiodactyls

Pseudamphimeryx is an extinct genus of Palaeogene artiodactyls belonging to the Amphimerycidae that was endemic to the central region of western Europe and lived from the Middle to Late Eocene. It was first erected in 1910 by the Swiss palaeontologist Hans Georg Stehlin, who assigned to it multiple species and noted specific differences from another amphimerycid Amphimeryx. As of present, it is known by six species, although the validity of P. valdensis has been questioned while the earliest-appearing species P. schosseri has been suggested to not be an amphimerycid.

References

  1. ↑ Cuvier, Georges (1804). "Suite des Recherches: Suite de recherches sur les os fossiles de la pierre à plâtre des environs de Paris. Troisième mémoire. Restitution des pieds. Première section. Restitution des différens pieds de derrière". Annales du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris (in French). 3: 442–472. Archived from the original on 2023-07-27. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
  2. 1 2 Cuvier, Georges (1822). Recherches sur les ossemens fossiles, où l'on rétablit les caractères de plusieurs animaux dont les révolutions du globe ont détruit les espèces. Vol. 3. G. Dufour and E. d'Ocagne. Archived from the original on 2023-08-19. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
  3. ↑ Lydekker, Richard (1885). Catalogue of the fossil Mammalia in the British museum, (Natural History): Part II. Containing the Order Ungulata, Suborder Artiodactyla. Order of the Trustees, London. Archived from the original on 2023-08-02. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
  4. ↑ Pomel, Auguste (1848). "Recherches sur les caractères et les rapports entre eux des divers genres vivants et fossiles des Mammifères ongulés". Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des sciences. 26: 686–688.
  5. ↑ von Zittel, Karl Alfred (1891–1893). Handbuch der Palaeontologie. I. Abtheilung. Palaeozoologie von Karl A. Zittel. IV. Band. (Mammalia). R. Oldenbourg. pp. 370–374.
  6. ↑ Stehlin, Hans Georg (1910). "Die Säugertiere des schweizerischen Eocaens. Sechster Teil: Catodontherium – Dacrytherium – Leptotherium – Anoplotherium – Diplobune – Xiphodon – Pseudamphimeryx – Amphimeryx – Dichodon – Haplomeryx – Tapirulus – Gelocus. Nachträge, Artiodactyla incertae sedis, Schlussbetrachtungen über die Artiodactylen, Nachträge zu den Perissodactylen". Abhandlungen der Schweizerischen Paläontologischen Gesellschaft. 36.
  7. 1 2 Viret, Jean (1961). "Artiodactyla". Traitè de Palèontologie. Masson. pp. 887–1104.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Erfurt, Jörg; Métais, Grégoire (2007). "Endemic European Paleogene Artiodactyls". In Prothero, Donald R.; Foss, Scott E. (eds.). The Evolution of Artiodactyls. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 59–84.
  9. ↑ Colbert, Edwin Harris (1941). "The osteology and relationships of Archaeomeryx, an ancestral ruminant". American Museum Novitates (1135): 1–24.
  10. ↑ Simpson, George Gaylord (1945). The Principles of Classification and a Classification of Mammals. Vol. 85. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History.
  11. ↑ Webb, S. David; Taylor, Beryl E. (1980). "The phylogeny of hornless ruminants and a description of the cranium of Archaeomeryx". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 167 (3): 121–157.
  12. ↑ McKenna, Malcolm; Bell, Susan K. (1997). Classification of Mammals: Above the Species Level. Columbia University Press. ISBN   978-0-231-52853-5.
  13. 1 2 3 Weppe, Romain (2022). Déclin des artiodactyles endémiques européens, autopsie d'une extinction (Thesis) (in French). University of Montpellier. Archived from the original on 2023-08-11. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
  14. ↑ Janis, Christine M.; Theodor, Jessica M. (2014). "Cranial and postcranial morphological data in ruminant phylogenetics". Zitteliana B. 32: 15–31. doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.22383.
  15. 1 2 Luccisano, Vincent; Sudre, Jean; Lihoreau, Fabrice (2020). "Revision of the Eocene artiodactyls (Mammalia, Placentalia) from Aumelas and Saint-Martin-de-Londres (Montpellier limestones, Hérault, France) questions the early European artiodactyl radiation". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 18 (19): 1631–1656. Bibcode:2020JSPal..18.1631L. doi:10.1080/14772019.2020.1799253. S2CID   221468663.
  16. 1 2 Weppe, Romain; Blondel, Cécile; Vianey-Liaud, Monique; Escarguel, Gilles; Pélissié, Thierry; Antoine, Pierre-Olivier; Orliac, Maëva Judith (2020). "Cainotheriidae (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) from Dams (Quercy, SW France): phylogenetic relationships and evolution around the Eocene–Oligocene transition (MP19–MP21)" (PDF). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 18 (7): 541–572. Bibcode:2020JSPal..18..541W. doi:10.1080/14772019.2019.1645754. S2CID   202026238. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-03-07. Retrieved 2023-09-19.
  17. ↑ Weppe, Romain; Blondel, Cécile; Vianey-Liaud, Monique; Pélissié, Thierry; Orliac, Maëva Judith (2020). "A new Cainotherioidea (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) from Palembert (Quercy, SW France): Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of the dental pattern of Cainotheriidae". Palaeontologia Electronica (23(3):a54). doi: 10.26879/1081 . S2CID   229490410.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 Blondel, Cécile (2001). "The Eocene-Oligocene ungulates from Western Europe and their environment" (PDF). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 168 (1–2): 125–139. Bibcode:2001PPP...168..125B. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00252-2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-22. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
  19. 1 2 3 Sudre, Jean (1978). Les Artiodactyles de l'Eocéne moyen et supérieur d'Europe occidentale. University of Montpellier.
  20. ↑ Lihoreau, Fabrice; Boisserie, Jean-Renaud; Viriot, Laurent; Brunet, Michel (2006). "Anthracothere dental anatomy reveals a late Miocene Chado-Libyan bioprovince". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103 (23): 8763–8767. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103.8763L. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603126103 . PMC   1482652 . PMID   16723392.
  21. 1 2 3 4 Dechaseaux, Colette (1974). "Artiodactyles primitifs des phosphorites du Quercy". Annales de Paléontologie. Vertèbres. 60: 59–100.
  22. 1 2 Vislobokova, Innessa Anatolevna (2001). "Evolution and classification of Tragulina (Ruminantia, Artiodactyla)". Paleontological Journal: 69–145.
  23. ↑ Pearson, Helga Sharpe (1927). "On the Skulls of Early Tertiary Suidae, together with an Account of the Otic Region in Some Other Primitive Artiodactyla". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character. 215 (421–430): 440–445. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1927.0009 .
  24. ↑ Sudre, Jean; Blondel, Cécile (1995). "Le tarse des Amphimerycidae d'Europe — Paraphylie des Ruminantia?". Geobios. 30: 43. doi:10.1016/S0016-6995(97)80068-X.
  25. 1 2 Métais, Grégoire (2006). "New basal selenodont artiodactyls from the Pondaung Formation (late middle Eocene, Myanmar) and the phylogenetic relationships of early ruminants". Annals of Carnegie Museum. 75 (1): 51–67. doi:10.2992/0097-4463(2006)75[51:NBSAFT]2.0.CO;2.
  26. 1 2 Sudre, Jean; Martinez, Jean-Noël (1995). "The astragalus of Paleogene artiodactyls: comparative morphology, variability and prediction of body mass". Lethaia. 28 (3): 197–209. Bibcode:1995Letha..28..197M. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1995.tb01423.x.
  27. ↑ Keller, Anna; Clauss, Marcus; Muggli, Evelyne; Nuss, Karl (2009). "Even-toed but uneven in length: the digits of artiodactyls" (PDF). Zoology. 112 (4): 270–278. Bibcode:2009Zool..112..270K. doi:10.1016/j.zool.2008.11.001. PMID   19386479.
  28. ↑ Clifford, Andrew B. (2010). "The Evolution of the Unguligrade Manus in Artiodactyls". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 30 (6): 1827–1839. Bibcode:2010JVPal..30.1827C. doi:10.1080/02724634.2010.521216.
  29. ↑ Eronen, Jussi T.; Janis, Christine M.; Chamberlain, Charles Page; Mulch, Andreas (2015). "Mountain uplift explains differences in Palaeogene patterns of mammalian evolution and extinction between North America and Europe". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 282 (1809): 20150136. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0136. PMC   4590438 . PMID   26041349.
  30. 1 2 Maitre, Elodie (2014). "Western European middle Eocene to early Oligocene Chiroptera: systematics, phylogeny and palaeoecology based on new material from the Quercy (France)". Swiss Journal of Palaeontology . 133 (2): 141–242. Bibcode:2014SwJP..133..141M. doi: 10.1007/s13358-014-0069-3 . S2CID   84066785.
  31. ↑ Licht, Alexis; Métais, Grégoire; Coster, Pauline; İbilioğlu, Deniz; Ocakoğlu, Faruk; Westerweel, Jan; Mueller, Megan; Campbell, Clay; Mattingly, Spencer; Wood, Melissa C.; Beard, K. Christopher (2022). "Balkanatolia: The insular mammalian biogeographic province that partly paved the way to the Grande Coupure". Earth-Science Reviews. 226: 103929. Bibcode:2022ESRv..22603929L. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103929 .
  32. ↑ Badiola, Ainara; Perales-Gogenola, Leire; Astibia, Humberto; Suberbiola, Xabier Pereda (2022). "A synthesis of Eocene equoids (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Iberian Peninsula: new signs of endemism". Historical Biology. 34 (8): 1623–1631. Bibcode:2022HBio...34.1623B. doi:10.1080/08912963.2022.2060098. S2CID   248164842.
  33. 1 2 3 Franzen, Jens Lorenz (2003). "Mammalian faunal turnover in the Eocene of central Europe". Geological Society of America Special Papers. 369: 455–461. doi:10.1130/0-8137-2369-8.455. ISBN   9780813723693.
  34. 1 2 3 4 5 Aguilar, Jean-Pierre; Legendre, Serge; Michaux, Jacques (1997). "Synthèses et tableaux de corrélations". Actes du Congrès Bio-chroM'97. Mémoires et Travaux de l'EPHE Institut de Montpellier 21 (in French). École Pratique des Hautes Études-Sciences de la Vie et de la Terre, Montpellier. pp. 769–850.
  35. 1 2 3 Schmidt-Kittler, Norbert; Godinot, Marc; Franzen, Jens L.; Hooker, Jeremy J. (1987). "European reference levels and correlation tables". Münchner geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen A10. Pfeil Verlag, München. pp. 13–31.
  36. ↑ Bai, Bin; Wang, Yuan-Qing; Theodor, Jessica M.; Meng, Jin (2023). "Small artiodactyls with tapir-like teeth from the middle Eocene of the Erlian Basin, Inner Mongolia, China". Frontiers in Earth Science. 11: 1–20. Bibcode:2023FrEaS..1117911B. doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1117911 .
  37. 1 2 Martin, Jeremy E.; Pochat-Cottilloux, Yohan; Laurent, Yves; Perrier, Vincent; Robert, Emmanuel; Antoine, Pierre-Olivier (2022). "Anatomy and phylogeny of an exceptionally large sebecid (Crocodylomorpha) from the middle Eocene of southern France". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 42 (4). Bibcode:2022JVPal..42E3828M. doi:10.1080/02724634.2023.2193828. S2CID   258361595.
  38. ↑ Buffetaut, Eric; Angst, Delphine (2014). Stratigraphic Distribution of Large Flightless Birds in the Palaeogene of Europe. STRATI 2013: First International Congress on Stratigraphy At the Cutting Edge of Stratigraphy. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04364-7_190.
  39. ↑ Martin, Jeremy E. (2015). "A sebecosuchian in a middle Eocene karst with comments on the dorsal shield in Crocodylomorpha". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 60 (3): 673–680. doi: 10.4202/app.00072.2014 . S2CID   54002673.
  40. ↑ Antunes, Miguel Telles (2003). "Lower Paleogene Crocodilians from Silveirinha, Portugal". Palaeovertebrata. 32: 1–26.
  41. ↑ Robinet, Céline; Remy, Jean Albert; Laurent, Yves; Danilo, Laure; Lihoreau, Fabrice (2015). "A new genus of Lophiodontidae (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the early Eocene of La Borie (Southern France) and the origin of the genus Lophiodon Cuvier, 1822". Geobios. 48 (1): 25–38. Bibcode:2015Geobi..48...25R. doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2014.11.003.
  42. ↑ Perales-Gogenola, Leire; Badiola, Ainara; Gómez-Olivencia, Asier; Pereda-Suberbiola, Xabier (2022). "A remarkable new paleotheriid (Mammalia) in the endemic Iberian Eocene perissodactyl fauna". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 42 (4). Bibcode:2022JVPal..42E9447P. doi:10.1080/02724634.2023.2189447. S2CID   258663753.
  43. ↑ Solé, Floréal; Fischer, Valentin; Le Verger, Kévin; Mennecart, Bastien; Speijer, Robert P.; Peigné, Stéphane; Smith, Thierry (2022). "Evolution of European carnivorous mammal assemblages through the Paleogene". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 135 (4): 734–753. doi:10.1093/biolinnean/blac002.
  44. ↑ Costa, Elisenda; Garcés, Miguel; Sáez, Alberto; Cabrera, Lluís; López-Blanco, Miguel (2011). "The age of the "Grande Coupure" mammal turnover: New constraints from the Eocene–Oligocene record of the Eastern Ebro Basin (NE Spain)". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 301 (1–4): 97–107. Bibcode:2011PPP...301...97C. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.01.005. hdl: 2445/34510 .
  45. ↑ Weppe, Romain; Condamine, Fabien L.; Guinot, Guillaume; Maugoust, Jacob; Orliac, Maëva J. (2023). "Drivers of the artiodactyl turnover in insular western Europe at the Eocene–Oligocene Transition". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120 (52): e2309945120. Bibcode:2023PNAS..12009945W. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2309945120 . PMC   10756263 . PMID   38109543.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.