European dark bee

Last updated

Apis mellifera mellifera
Bee October 2007-1.jpg
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Hymenoptera
Family: Apidae
Genus: Apis
Species:
Subspecies:
A. m. mellifera
Trinomial name
Apis mellifera mellifera
Synonyms [2]
  • Apis mellifica germanica (Pollmann 1879)
  • Apis mellifica nigrita (Lucas 1882)
  • Apis mellifica mellifica variety lehzeni (Buttel-Reepen 1906)
  • Apis mellifica mellifica variety siziliana (Buttel-Reepen 1906)
  • Apis mellifera mellifera variety tesquorum (Skorikov 1929)
  • Apis niger (Baldensperger 1932)
  • Apis mellifica mellifica siloarum (Goetze 1964)

The Apis mellifera mellifera (commonly known as the European dark bee) is a subspecies of the western honey bee, evolving in central Asia, with a proposed origin of the Tien Shan Mountains [3] and later migrating into eastern and then northern Europe after the last ice age from 9,000BC onwards. Its original range included the southern Urals in Russia and stretched through northern Europe and down to the Pyrenees. They are one of the two members of the 'M' lineage of Apis mellifera, the other being in western China. [4] Traditionally they were called the Black German Bee, [5] although they are now considered endangered in Germany. [6] However today they are more likely to be called after the geographic / political region in which they live such as the British Black Bee, the Native Irish Honey Bee, the Cornish Black Bee and the Nordic Brown Bee, even though they are all the same subspecies, with the word "native" often inserted by local beekeepers, even in places where the bee is an introduced foreign species. [7] It was domesticated in Europe and hives were brought to North America in the colonial era in 1622 where they were referred to as the English Fly by the Native Americans. [8]

Contents

Appearance

The A. m. mellifera can be broadly distinguished from other subspecies by their stocky body, abundant thoracal and sparse abdominal hair which is brown, and overall dark coloration. When viewed from a distance, they appear blackish or rich dark brown. They are large for honey bees though they have unusually short tongues (5.7–6.4 mm (0.22–0.25 in)). [9] Their common name (dark or black bee) is derived from their brown-black color, with only a few lighter yellow spots on the abdomen. [10] On a pigmentation rating from 0 (completely dark) to 9 (completely bright yellow) the A. m. mellifera scores 2.1, for comparison a A. m. carnica scores a 1.3 and a A. m. ligustica scores a 7.8. [11] In 2019 research concluded that honey bees in Ireland that were completely dark contained less A. m. mellifera DNA than bees with yellow to orange spots on their abdomens, and bees with pigmentation on their first and second tergites (segments of their abdomens) contained a comparable amount of A. m. mellifera DNA than the completely dark bees, the authors speculated that the completely dark bees had obtained their darker pigmentation from A. m. carnica DNA. [12]

Friedrich Ruttner worked closely with senior members of the BIBBA (Bee Improvement & Bee Breeders Association) in Britain to identify wing veins (wing morphometry) to achieve "racial purity" in the breeding of their bees, culminating in the publication of their book The Dark European Honeybee. [13] However the process depends on the exact measuring methods employed. [14]

Character

A. m. mellifera is descended from the 'M' lineage of Apis mellifera , of which all bees to a greater or lesser degree have aggression when compared to the 'C' lineage. [15] A. m. mellifera hybrids have an even greater reputation of aggression amongst beekeepers, which can increase in subsequent generations if left unchecked, [16] although this characteristic can be overcome with continual selective breeding over some generations. [17] They are nervous and aggressive to the extent that routine inspections will take longer, decreasing the enjoyment of managing their colonies. [18] This characteristic is one that has been traditionally associated with A. m. mellifera going back to the now extinct Old British Black bee before the early 1900s: [19] [20] To quote Brother Adam who was the only beekeeper with first hand experience that committed his findings to paper: [21]

"The native (Old British Black) bee had undoubtedly many extremely valuable characteristics, but equally so a great many serious defects and drawbacks. She was very bad tempered and very susceptible to brood diseases and would in any case not have been able to produce the crops (of honey) we have secured since her demise". [22]

In 2014-2017 a European wide survey was conducted with 621 colonies, which included the various subspecies kept by beekeepers, it found that the A. m. mellifera was the most aggressive, had the highest swarming tendency and the lowest hygienic behaviour - a trait closely linked with Varroa sensitive hygiene. [23]

Characteristics

Non-hybridization

In 2013 research was carried out in Poland which confirmed anecdotal evidence that A. m. mellifera virgin Queens do not readily mate with non-A. m. mellifera drones, "The progeny of AMM queens was fathered almost exclusively by AMM drones. On the other hand, progeny of AMC queens was fathered by drones of both subspecies". [35] Further research was conducted in western Ireland on Beara peninsula (as part of genetic research carried out throughout the island in 2017), which confirmed the 2013 Polish research in that the A. m. mellifera virgin Queens were not mating with either A. m. carnica or Buckfast drones, nor their hybrids. Several conjectures were presented as an explanation to this characteristic of A. m. mellifera, but no conclusion was reached. [36]

Significance

Apis mellifera mellifera British Black Bee, Lost Gardens of Heligan Sep 2017 1920 x 1080.png
Apis mellifera mellifera

The A. m. mellifera had become established from the Urals to northwestern Europe by the 1800's until the introduction of other bee subspecies, considered more suited to modern beekeeping, such as the A. m. carnica or the Buckfast bee, a breed of bee whose ancestry originally included the remnants of the old British black bee (a strain or phenotype of A. m. mellifera), which became extinct due to the Isle of Wight Disease .

In the United States, research based on DNA sequencing analysis found DNA from the 'M' lineage of honey bees in the feral population of Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Missouri, believed in part to be the DNA from imported bees of over 100 years ago (DNA from the other bee lineages was also found in these feral populations, suggesting that they likely came from escaped swarms from apiaries at multiple unknown times in the past). [37]

Promotion and conservation areas

Dedicated organizations [38] [39] have been attempting to establish exclusive conservation areas for A. m. mellifera, also breeding groups have been set up to "establish racial purity" of "native strains" [40] and others running courses to train beekeepers in being able to calculate the "racial purity" of their bees through wing morphometry. [41] Other organizations are attempting to establish that the A. m. mellifera in their local geographic region are a distinct "variety", [42] some even claiming it is a separate subspecies, [43] of the A. m. mellifera subspecies, but to date there is no published research to support this, however through morphometry and DNA analysis local geographic strains may be able to be identified, albeit not consistent across the geographic population, in which the strain's characteristics show less morphometric variation and therefore less environmental adaptability. [44] With one group even starting a "project to develop their own native breed of bee". [45] Many promoters of the A. m. mellifera claim that the sub-species is endangered and under threat from imports, even though DNA analysis has been able to show that the amount of non-A. m. mellifera DNA within local populations of A. m. mellifera remains relatively low, [46] with an Irish survey showing that 97.8% of sampled bees were determined to be pure A. m. mellifera, [47] and a further study across eight northwest European countries showing that their A. m. mellifera populations were genetically pure. [48]

Nazi Germany

Logo of the Reich Ministry of Food and Agriculture, and the Blood and Soil ideology Blut und Boden.svg
Logo of the Reich Ministry of Food and Agriculture, and the Blood and Soil ideology

In 1937 the Third Reich implemented nativist policies to protect and promote the A. m. mellifera, as an extension of their ideology of "Blood and Soil" ( Blut und Boden - a Nazi slogan expressing a racially defined group pertaining to a geographic area), [49] by banning imports of Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) and regulating the breeding of bees, in which only registered breeders at designated locations were permitted to rear queens to supply German beekeepers; however a limited dispensation was made for a minority of A. m. carnica beekeepers in southern Germany constituting only 13% overall. But after the annexation of Austria in 1938 the amount of A. m. carnica breeders increased to 31%. In 1939 actions were taken to reduce the numbers (by approximately 95%) of A. m. carnica being bred in Germany, resulting in the Native German Dark bee being promoted fore-mostly. Beekeeping literature at the time used the racial ideological vocabulary of the National Socialists (only in concentrated form), such as: "What is not race is chaff!" "Foreign drones are to be exterminated" and "But what use is it if one day a Jewish bastard (a German with Jewish ancestry) is a genius, but our ethnic purity is destroyed in the process (through inter-marriage). It is no different with beekeeping, what use is the importation of foreign breeds (sub-species)... if our (Native) German bee is lost in the process (through inter-breeding)".

However starting in the winter of 1940 to 1942, beekeeping was devastated throughout Germany by huge colony deaths, later identified by Karl Von Frisch as a virulent strain of Nosema apis, through his work with the Nosema Council to try and tackle the problem; ironically it was this epidemic that saved Von Frisch from the Nazis' antisemitic policies, as his maternal Grandmother was Jewish, making him "25% Jewish" ("75% German"). [50]

As a result restrictions against the breeding of A. m. carnica was lifted and German beekeepers began to re-stock with more disease resistant Austrian A. m. carnica bees: After the war all National Socialism rhetoric was abandoned and breeding of bees was purely focused on performance and character. It was then decided by the German Beekeeping Associations to keep only the A. m. carnica bee due to its superior characteristics; as a result the Old German Dark bee (A. m. mellifera) is now considered an endangered sub-species in Germany. [51] [52]

Isle of Man

Poster produced by the Isle of Man Beekeepers Federation. IoM Aniti Import Poster.jpg
Poster produced by the Isle of Man Beekeepers Federation.

In 1988, the Importation of Bees Order made it illegal to import bees or used bee equipment into the Isle of Man. Originally this was done to prevent the Varroa mite from arriving on the island; in 2015 the EU "declared the Isle of Man officially free of the bee pest Varroa". [53] However, in 2015 the Isle of Man Beekeepers' Federation launched the Manx Bee Improvement Group, to promote what they called the "Manx Dark Honey Bee (Apis mellifera mellifera)". They work closely with the BIBBA with the stated goal of eliminating "foreign strains" from the island through regular inspections of hives. [54] Beekeepers on the Isle of Man are now compelled to register their bees in line with the Bee Diseases and Pest Control (Isle of Man) Order 2008, they must inform the Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture of any movement of bees or bee equipment and the creation of new hives; failure to register or comply, risks prosecution [55] and "a fine not exceeding £5,000". [56]

Isle of Læsø

In 1993 a conservation area for A. m. mellifera was established on the island of Læsø in Denmark, where it became illegal to keep and import any other type of bee other than Apis mellifera mellifera, this was met with protests and a legal battle lasting eight years from other beekeepers of A. m. ligustica, A. m. carnica and Buckfast bees as they did not "want to become a custodian of poor bees", they also stated that A. m. mellifera was "unproductive" and "not worthy of protection". They lost their case in 2001, [57] and negotiations between A. m. mellifera beekeepers and non-A. m. mellifera beekeepers were concluded in 2004, splitting the island in two between them, ending a "history of sabotage of bees" on the island. [58] The A. m. mellifera supporters claimed that they had "introduced apartheid on Læsø for the bees". [59]

A 2014 European wide survey, which covered 621 colonies, found that the A. m. mellifera from Læsø had the lowest hygienic behaviour of all bees tested, (a trait closely linked with Varroa sensitive hygiene) which would make them more susceptible to varroa mites. [23]

Islands of Colonsay and Oronsay

In 2013 the Scottish Government introduced the Bee Keeping (Colonsay and Oronsay) Order, making it an offence to keep any other honeybee [60] ( Apis mellifera ) on either island other than the subspecies Apis mellifera mellifera. [61] The Environment and Climate Change Minister said at the time, "The Bee Keeping Order illustrates how our non-native species legislation can be used to protect our native wildlife. The order is a targeted measure to protect an important population of black bees on Colonsay from hybridisation" (the "non-native species legislation" was used because Apis mellifera are considered to be non-native to Colonsay, but considered native to Scotland as it was the first honey bee to be introduced for use in beekeeping ). [62] The islands are home to fifty to sixty beehives (a minimum of fifty colonies of unrelated bees are required to prevent inbreeding) [63] and are referred to now as the "Colonsay Dark Native Bee" [64] even though they were collected from across Scotland in the previous thirty years and genetic analysis has shown introgression from Australian and New Zealand A. m. ligustica. [65] In 2018 it was claimed by the Galtee Bee Breeding Group (GBBG) [66] based in Ireland in County Tipperary that they had "sent bees to Colonsay", earlier DNA evidence had confirmed a genetic link between the two populations. [67]

In the media

(1) The Old "British Black" bee was "wiped out by a strain of Spanish flu in 1919":
The Spanish flu only affected humans, it was the Isle of Wight Disease between 1904 through to 1945 that was believed to have wiped out the original Old British (and Irish) Black Bees of the British Isles.
(2) "The Spanish flu which wiped out ... every single bee in the UK":
No beekeepers at the time made this claim, what was claimed was that the indigenous Apis mellifera mellifera of the British Isles was wiped out, hybrids with other non-Apis mellifera mellifera bees often survived, notably A. m. ligustica and later the Buckfast bee bred by Brother Adam of Buckfast Abbey, also continental A. m. mellifera, imported in subsequent years to repopulate the country, showed stronger resistance to the Isle of Wight Disease. [75]
(3) "The British Black bee is different from other bees ... ideally suited to the British climate ... more so than the European Black bee":
This suggests that the "British Black Bee" found in the church is a different subspecies than the "European Black Bee" (A. m. mellifera), while in fact they are the same subspecies, as acknowledged by Philip Denwood writing in SICAMM's magazine mellifera.ch in 2014 (as a member of BBKA and the BIBBA) "... in the last decade DNA studies ... have conclusively shown that modern specimens of Dark Bees from the UK and Ireland fit into the genetic specification of Apis mellifera mellifera (the European dark / black bee)". [76]

Breeding for Varroa resistance

Varroa sensitive hygiene (VSH)

In 2010, it was announced at the VIth COLOSS Conference that a project using the British native honey bee Apis mellifera mellifera was to be set up to breed for Varroa Sensitive Hygiene (VSH). [77] In April 2016, the Laboratory of Apiculture and Social Insects at the University of Sussex (LASI) began blogging about the project. They stated, "we have established LASI Queen Bees to supply our hygienic bees to UK beekeepers", supplying "several hundred queens to British beekeepers". By May 2017 many of the apiaries had a standstill order [78] imposed on them by Bee Inspectors of the National Bee Unit [79] to prevent the spread of EFB (European foulbrood) from infected colonies, a disease associated with a low nurse bee to brood ratio, resulting in lower hygiene levels within the hive. [80] The LASI Queen Bees breeding project "using the British native honey bee" has not been revived. [81]

Grooming behavior

In 2016 Dorian Pritchard, [82] a prominent member of the BIBBA and SICAMM, [83] published an article in The Journal of Apicultural Research, entitled "Grooming by honey bees as a component of varroa resistant behavior", [82] in which he reviewed much of the existing research into the "assumed links" between the grooming behavior of honey bees and varroa resistance stating "one of the most effective recognized means of defense is body grooming", even though varroa mite resistance had already been achieved in 2008 through the breeding of bees with VSH. [84]

In promoting A. m. mellifera for breeding of the grooming behavior, the paper states that "Anecdotal reports suggest that the high level of resistance of some British near-native A. m. mellifera strains may be due to grooming, but no detailed reports have yet been published". [82] [lower-alpha 1]

Pritchard goes on to promote A. m. mellifera by citing research by Bak & Wilde (2016) [86] into the grooming behavior and Pritchard states "that A. m. mellifera of the Augustowska line were outstandingly the most reactive to the presence of a mite placed on their bodies, 98% of bees reacting to shed the mite"; the Bak and Wilde research paper stated "as many as 98% of worker bees in this group (A. m. mellifera) made an attempt to remove mites", while for "Carniolan (A. m. carnica) bees" it was 89.3% and for "Caucasian ( A. m. caucasia ) bees" it was 86%. However, only 8.2% of the A. m. mellifera were successful in removing mites, for the A. m. caucasia it was 10.9%, and for the A. m. carnica it was near 3.5%. It was noted that "no mites were actually damaged in the laboratory experiments" and that "about 80% of mites removed remounted their hosts and remarkably, no physical damage was visible on any mites, even after bees had been seen vigorously shaking and even chewing them". [82]

However, research into "hygienic behaviour" (VSH) previously published by Siuda et al. (2007) [87] had concluded that the "Bees of A. m. mellifera (also the Augustowska line) demonstrated the strongest ability for cleaning comb cells from dead capped brood, however many of their behavioural characters did not promote the management of modern apiaries. The better solution would be rather the selection of lines with hygienic behaviour on the basis of Carniolan or Caucasian bees". [87] A subsequent paper published by Kruitwagen et al. (2017) [88] concluded that the grooming behavior itself did not lead to Varroa resistance and on average led to higher mite levels. [88]

Breeding for grooming behavior with the aim of achieving Varroa resistance is still promoted by A. m. mellifera organisations. [89] [90] [91]

Footnotes

  1. The phrase "near-native" within black bee beekeeping circles refers to bees which have some non-A. m. mellifera DNA, but otherwise their appearance matches A. m. mellifera. [85]

Related Research Articles

Beekeeping is the maintenance of bee colonies, commonly in man-made beehives. Honey bees in the genus Apis are the most commonly kept species but other honey producing bees such as Melipona stingless bees are also kept. Beekeepers keep bees to collect honey and other products of the hive: beeswax, propolis, bee pollen, and royal jelly. Other sources of beekeeping income include pollination of crops, raising queens, and production of package bees for sale. Bee hives are kept in an apiary or "bee yard".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Buckfast bee</span> Breed of honey bee

The Buckfast bee is a breed of honey bee, a cross of many subspecies and their strains, developed by Brother Adam, who was in charge of beekeeping from 1919 at Buckfast Abbey in Devon in the United Kingdom. Breeding of the Buckfast bee is now done by breeders throughout Europe belonging to the Federation of European Buckfast Beekeepers (G.D.E.B.). This organization maintains a pedigree for Buckfast bees, originating from the time of Brother Adam.

Within biological taxonomy, a honey bee race would be an informal rank in the taxonomic hierarchy, below the level of subspecies. It has been used as a higher rank than strain, with several strains making up one race. Therefore, a strain is a lower-level taxonomic rank used at the intraspecific level within a race of a subspecies. Strains are often seen as inherently artificial concepts, more usually within biology as characterized by a specific intent for genetic isolation, however, within beekeeping circles, strain is more likely to be used to describe very minor differences throughout the same subspecies, such as the color ranges of A. m. carnica from brown to grey. Within A. m. ligustica there are two races, the darker leather brown northern Italian bee from the Ligurian Alps region which was discovered to be resistant to acarine in the 1900s, while the other Italian bee race, from regions near Bologna and further south, was highly susceptible to acarine and within this race there are two color strains, the traditional Italian yellow and a rarer all-golden color.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Italian bee</span> Subspecies of honey bee

Apis mellifera ligustica is the Italian bee or the Italian Honey bee which is a subspecies of the western honey bee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caucasian honey bee</span> Subspecies of western honey bee

The Caucasian honey bee is a subspecies of the western honey bee.

<i>Varroa</i> Genus of mites

Varroa is a genus of parasitic mesostigmatan mites associated with honey bees, placed in its own family, Varroidae. The genus was named for Marcus Terentius Varro, a Roman scholar and beekeeper. The condition of a honeybee colony being infested with Varroa mites is called varroosis.

<i>Varroa jacobsoni</i> Species of mite

Varroa jacobsoni is a species of mite that parasitises Apis cerana. The more damaging Varroa destructor was previously included under the name V. jacobsoni, but the two species can be separated on the basis of the DNA sequence of the cytochrome oxidase I gene in the mitochondrial DNA.

The Maltese honey bee, Apis mellifera ruttneri, is a subspecies of the western honey bee, endemic to the Maltese islands which are situated in the Mediterranean Sea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beekeeping in the United States</span> Commercial beekeeping in the United States

Commercial Beekeeping in the United States dates back to the 1860s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beekeeping in New Zealand</span>

Beekeeping in New Zealand is reported to have commenced in 1839 with the importing of two skep hives by Mary Bumby, a missionary. It has since become an established industry as well a hobby activity.

Robert "Bert" Orlando Beater Manley was a British farmer and beekeeper, an authority on commercial honey farming and developer of the popular Manley moveable frame hives and frame systems.

Varroa sensitive hygiene (VSH) is a behavioral trait of honey bees (Apis mellifera) in which bees detect and remove bee pupae that are infested by the parasitic mite Varroa destructor. V. destructor is considered to be the most dangerous pest problem for honey bees worldwide. VSH activity results in significant resistance to the mites.

Beekeeping is first recorded in Ireland in the seventh century. It has seen a surge in popularity in modern times, with the membership of beekeeping associations exceeding 4,500. The median average number of hives per beekeeper is three hives, while the average honey output per hive is 11.4 kg. The growth in the practice has occurred despite increased pressures on bees and beekeepers due to parasites, diseases and habitat loss.

Beekeeping in the United Kingdom is the maintenance of bee colonies by humans within the United Kingdom. It is a significant commercial activity that provides those involved with honey, beeswax, royal jelly, queen bees, propolis, flower pollen and bee pollen. Honeybees also provide pollination services to orchards and a variety of seed crops.

<i>Apis mellifera anatoliaca</i> Subspecies of honey bee

Apis mellifera anatoliaca is a subspecies of Apis mellifera.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mite biting bees</span>

Mite Biting Is one of the behavioral mechanisms of honey bees used to fight off the ectoparasitic mites Varroa destructor. This behavior has been studied since the late 1990s for honey bee breeding and improvement of honeybee stocks towards mite resistance. Krispn Given and Dr. Greg Hunt at Purdue University started a hierarchical selective breeding program in 1997–present for increased mite-biting and grooming behavior of European honey bee. A group of Midwest bee breeders visiting the Purdue bee lab were inspired to start the Heartland Honey Bee Breeders Cooperative as a result of their pioneering work.

The Foundation for the Conservation of the Maltese honey bee is a Maltese non-governmental organisation aimed at the protection and conservation of the Maltese honey bee, a subspecies of the western honey bee.

<i>Apis mellifera syriaca</i> Subspecies of honey bee

Apis mellifera syriaca is known by the common name of the Syrian honey bee, sometimes also called the Palestine honey bee.

References

  1. Michael S Engel (1999). "The taxonomy of recent and fossil honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae; Apis)". Journal of Hymenoptera Research. 8 (2): 180. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
  2. Michael S Engel (1999). "The taxonomy of recent and fossil honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae; Apis)". Journal of Hymenoptera Research. 8 (2): 180. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
  3. Chao Chen; Zhiguang Liu; Qi Pan; Xiao Chen; Huihua Wang; Haikun Guo; Shidong Liu; Hongfeng Lu; Shilin Tian; Ruiqiang Li; Wei Shi (2016). "Genomic Analyses Reveal Demographic History and Temperate Adaptation of the Newly Discovered Honey Bee Subspecies Apis mellifera sinisxinyuan n. ssp". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 5 (33): 1337–1348. doi:10.1093/molbev/msw017. PMC   4839221 . PMID   26823447.
  4. Tihelka, E.; Cai, C.; Pisani, D. (2020). "Mitochondrial genomes illuminate the evolutionary history of the Western honey bee (Apis mellifera)". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 14515. Bibcode:2020NatSR..1014515T. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-71393-0. PMC   7471700 . PMID   32884034.
  5. Stratton-Porter, G. (1925). The Keeper of the Bees. New York: Doubleday, Page & Company. pp. 77 & 152.
  6. "Rote Liste der bedrohten Nutztierrassen in Deutschland". g-e-h.de. Gesellschaft zur Erhaltung alter und gefährdeter Haustierrassen e. V. (GEH). Archived from the original on 7 April 2018. Retrieved 19 November 2018.
  7. "Colonsay Dark Native Bees (Photo at bottom))". Colonsay Black Bee Reserve. snhbs.scot. SNHBS. Retrieved 19 November 2018.
  8. Renaud, Tabitha (2010). Finding worth in the wilderness (Thesis ed.). Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa. p. 74. ISBN   978-0-494-74142-9 . Retrieved 16 November 2018.
  9. "Institute for Bee Research (European Apis mellifera)". beebreed.eu. Hohen Neuendorf, Germany.: Institute for Bee Research. Retrieved 19 November 2018.
  10. Winston, Mark L. (1991). The Biology of the Honey Bee. Harvard University Press. p. 10. ISBN   978-0-674-07409-5.
  11. Walter Sheppard, Marina Meixner (2003). "Apis mellifera pomonella, a new honey bee subspecies from Central Asia". Apidologie. 34 (4): 367–375. doi: 10.1051/apido:2003037 . Retrieved 27 January 2023.
  12. D. Henriques; A. Lopes; R. Ferrari; C. Neves; A. Quaresma; K. Browne; G. McCormack; M. Pinto (2020). "Can introgression in M-lineage honey bees be detected by abdominal colour patterns?". Apidologie. 51 (4): 583–593. doi:10.1007/s13592-020-00744-7. hdl: 10198/22343 . S2CID   256206114 . Retrieved 27 January 2023.
  13. Friedrich Ruttner; Eric Milner; John E. Dews (2004). The Dark European Honeybee: Apis Mellifera Mellifera Linnaeus 1758. BIBBA. ISBN   1-904623-17-4.
  14. Özkan Koca, Ayça; Kandemir, İrfan (2013). "Comparison of two morphometric methods for discriminating honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) populations in Turkey". Turkish Journal of Zoology. 37 (2): 205–210. doi: 10.3906/zoo-1104-10 .
  15. Yates, J.D.; Yates, B.D. (1996). Beekeeping Study Notes for the BBKA Examinations. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Northern Bee Books. pp. 28–29. ISBN   978-0-905652-81-8.
  16. Bruder, Adam (November 2015). "Die wirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Kombinationszucht (seitennummer 7-8)" (PDF). Gemeinschaft der europäischen Buckfastimker e.V. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
  17. Waring, Claire; Waring, Adrian (2014). The Bee Manual. J. H. Haynes & Co. Ltd. p. 23. ISBN   978-0-85733-809-9.
  18. Davis, Celia F. (2014). The Honey Bee around & about (2nd ed.). Bee Craft Ltd. p. 10. ISBN   978-0-900147-15-9.
  19. Winston, Mark L. (1991). The Biology of the Honey Bee (paper ed.). First Harvard University Press. p. 10. ISBN   978-0-674-07409-5.
  20. Yates, J.D.; Yates, B.D. (1996). Beekeeping Study Notes for the BBKA Examinations Vol.1 (2nd ed.). Northern Bee Books. p. 29. ISBN   978-0-905652-81-8.
  21. Yates, J.D.; Yates, B.D. (2012). Beekeeping Study Notes BBKA Examinatins Volume 1 (2 ed.). Northern Bee Books. p. 29. ISBN   978-0-905652-81-8.
  22. 1 2 Brother Adam O.B.E. (1975). Beekeeping at Buckfast Abbey (first ed.). British Bee Publications. p. 12.
  23. 1 2 3 4 5 Andonov, S. (2014). "Swarming, defensive and hygienic behaviour in honey bee colonies of different genetic origin in a pan-European experiment". Journal of Apicultural Research. 53 (2): 248–260. doi: 10.3896/IBRA.1.53.2.06 . S2CID   56261380 . Retrieved 10 October 2019.
  24. Beowulf Cooper, David A. Cushman. "Apiary Vicinity Mating (AVM)". dave-cushman.net. Retrieved 17 February 2021.
  25. Kaspar Bienefeld; F. Reinhardt; F. Pirchner (1989). "Inbreeding effects of queen and workers on colony traits in the honey bee". Apidologie (20): 439–450. Retrieved 17 February 2021.
  26. Hatjina, F.; Papaefthimiou, C.; Gregorc, A.; Theophilidis, G. (2004). "Differences in the morphology of prothoracic and propodeal spiracles in three strains of Apis mellifera: Possible relation to resistance against Acarapis woodi". Journal of Apicultural Research. 43 (3): 105–113. doi:10.1080/00218839.2004.11101119. S2CID   89091316 . Retrieved 29 November 2018.
  27. "Characteristics of Races of Honeybees" (PDF). three-peaks.net. Three Peaks. Retrieved 19 November 2018.
  28. Aston, David; Bucknall, Sally (2014). Plants and Honey Bees their relationships (3 ed.). NBB. p. 63. ISBN   978-0-393-30879-2.
  29. "Pollen spectra of Buckfast and Dark Bees". Mellifera.ch Magazin. 2012 (Conference): Chart. 2012. Retrieved 3 January 2019.
  30. Yates, J.D.; Yates, B.D. (1997). Beekeeping Study Notes (Modules 5, 6, 7 & 8) (2nd ed.). Bee Books New and Old. p. 84. ISBN   978-0-905652-72-6.
  31. Beowulf A. Cooper (1986). The Honeybees of the British Isles (1 ed.). BIBBA. p. 29. ISBN   0-905369-06-8.
  32. Beowulf A. Cooper (1986). The Honeybees of the British Isles (1 ed.). BIBBA. p. 23. ISBN   0-905369-06-8.
  33. Dr. Jack Hassett (2 October 2021). "Beara Peninsula Case Study". Ulster Beekeepers Association AGM 2021 Webinar.
  34. Oleksa, A.; Wilde, J.; Tofilski, A. (2013). "Partial reproductive isolation between European subspecies of honey bees". Apidologie. 44 (5): 611–619. doi: 10.1007/s13592-013-0212-y . S2CID   18576927.
  35. Oleksa, A.; Wilde, J.; Tofilski, A. (2013). "Partial reproductive isolation between European subspecies of honey bees". Apidologie. 44 (5): 611–619. doi: 10.1007/s13592-013-0212-y . S2CID   18576927.
  36. Dr. Jack Hassett (2 October 2021). "Beara Peninsula Case Study". Ulster Beekeepers Association AGM 2021 Webinar.
  37. "Honey Bee & Bumble Bee Genetics Research". Insects Genetics Lab. University of Arkansas. Archived from the original on 27 May 2011.
  38. "BIBBA". Bee Improvement & Bee Breeders Assoc. Retrieved 9 November 2018.
  39. "NIHBS - Aims & Objectives". nihbs.org. The Native Irish Honey Bee Society. Retrieved 10 November 2018.
  40. "Establishing Racial Purity". gbbg.net. Aims & Objectives. Galtee Bee Breeding Group. Archived from the original on 11 November 2018. Retrieved 10 November 2018.
  41. "Wing Morphometry Course". pbka.info. Pembrokeshire Beekeepers' Association. 20 October 2010. Retrieved 13 November 2018.
  42. Ian Steadman. "Rare Cornish black honeybee found to resist colony collapse virus". Wired UK. WIRED. Retrieved 7 January 2022.
  43. "Update 15 - genetic results". cbibbg.co.uk. Cornwall Bee Improvement and Bee Breeders Group. Retrieved 10 November 2018.
  44. Strange, James; Garnery, Lionel; Sheppard, Walter (October 2008). "Morphological and molecular characterization of the Landes honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) ecotype for genetic conservation". Journal of Insect Conservation. 12 (5): 527–537. doi:10.1007/s10841-007-9093-6. S2CID   25790106.
  45. "Pembrokeshire Beekeepers' Association developing native bee breed". www.bbc.co.uk. BBC News. Retrieved 13 November 2018.
  46. L Ruottinen; P Berg; J Kantanen; TN Kristensen; A Præbel. "Status and Conservation of the Nordic Brown Bee" (PDF). nordgen.org. The Nordic Genetic Resource Centre. Retrieved 10 November 2018.
  47. Moore, E.; Soland, G.; McCormack, G.; Hasset, J.; Browne, K.; Geary, M.; et al. (Native Irish Honey Bee Society (NIHBS)) (2018). "A significant pure population of the dark European honey bee (Apis mellifera mellifera) remains in Ireland". Journal of Apicultural Research. 57 (3): 337–350. doi: 10.1080/00218839.2018.1433949 .
  48. Jensen, A.B.; Palmer, K.A.; Boomsma, J.J.; Pedersen, Bo.V. (2004). "Varying degrees of Apis mellifera ligustica introgression in protected populations of the black honeybee, Apis mellifera mellifera, in northwest Europe". Molecular Ecology. 14 (1): 93–106. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02399.x. PMID   15643954. S2CID   25869521.
  49. Barbara Miller Lane, Leila J. Rupp, Nazi Ideology Before 1933: A Documentation p. 110-1 ISBN   0-292-75512-0
  50. Karl Von Frisch (1957). Erinnerungen eines Biologen (3 ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 115–123. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61968-7. ISBN   978-3-540-06451-0 . Retrieved 30 October 2021.
  51. Dr. Phil. Die Bienenzucht in der völkisch - nationalistischen Bewegung (1 ed.). Bad Bergzabern: Universität Heidelberg. pp. 207–331. Retrieved 30 October 2021.
  52. Friedrich Karl Tiesler. "Vom Ursprung der Sklenarbiene". bienenzucht.de. Bienenzucht + Imkerei. Retrieved 30 October 2021.
  53. "Bee importation into the Isle of Man prohibited". iombeekeepers.com. IoMB. 2015-02-23. Retrieved 23 January 2019.
  54. "The quest to improve the Manx dark honey bee". issuu.com. MBIG. Retrieved 23 January 2019.
  55. "Bee Holdings". gov.im. Government of the Isle of Man. Retrieved 23 January 2019.
  56. Kipps, Johnny (17 May 2015). "Penalty for breaking the Bees Act – £5,000". iombeekeepers.com. Isle of Man Beekeepers. Retrieved 5 November 2019.
  57. "Re: Criminal proceedings against Ditlev Bluhme" (PDF). biicl.org. Court of Justice of the European Communities. Retrieved 22 January 2019.
  58. Kryger, Per. "SNHBS Annual Meeting - Diversity in European Honey Bees". snhbs.scot. SNHBS. Retrieved 22 January 2019.
  59. Kryger, Per. "Diversity in European honey bees - How to conserve it?" (PDF). snhbs.scot. SNHBS. Retrieved 22 January 2019.
  60. "Argyll & Bute Council sign at harbour".
  61. "The Bee Keeping (Colonsay and Oronsay) Order 2013". legislation.gov.uk. The National Archives. Retrieved 9 November 2018.
  62. "Colonsay and Oronsay to become honeybee havens". Scotland on Sunday. The Scotsman . Edinburgh, UK. Retrieved 7 October 2013.
  63. Bienefeld, Kaspar; Pritchard, Dorian. "Effects of inbreeding on the honeybee". dave-cushman.net. The Scottish Beekeepers' Association. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
  64. Abrahams, Andrew. "Colonsay Black Bee Reserve". snhbs.scot. Scottish native Honey Bee Society. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
  65. Thompson, Catherine Eleanor. "The health and status of the feral honeybee (Apis mellifera sp.) and Apis mellifera mellifera population of the UK" (PDF). Faculty of Biological Sciences. whiterose.ac.uk. The University of Leeds. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
  66. "GBBG - Home page". Galtee Bee Breeding Group. Retrieved 29 December 2018.
  67. Moore, E.; Soland, G.; McCormack, G.; Hasset, J.; Browne, K.; Geary, M.; et al. (Native Irish Honey Bee Society (NIHBS)) (2018). "A significant pure population of the dark European honey bee (Apis mellifera mellifera) remains in Ireland". Journal of Apicultural Research. 57 (3): 337–350. doi: 10.1080/00218839.2018.1433949 .
  68. "More than Honey". morethanhoneyfilm.com. Marcus Imhoof. Retrieved 12 November 2018.
  69. "The origins of the Documentary More Than Honey" (PDF). beelebanon.files.wordpress.com. Marcus Imhoof. Retrieved 12 November 2018.
  70. Bienefeld, Kaspar (1994). Genetic characteristics of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) favour recurrent selection. 5th World Congr Genet. Appl. Livestock Prod. Vol. 19. pp. 115–118. Retrieved 28 January 2019.
  71. "Good to bee back: 'Extinct' British breed of honeybee found alive and well in church rafters after nearly 80 years". forums.moneysavingexpert.com. Money Saving Expert. Retrieved 12 November 2018.
  72. "Bees find sanctuary in church roof". churchtimes.co.uk. Church Times. Retrieved 12 November 2018.
  73. "BIBBA History And Development". bibba.com. BIBBA. Retrieved 12 November 2018.
  74. "SICAMM (International Association for the Protection of the Dark Honey Bee)". sicamm.org/. Retrieved 16 November 2018.
  75. Brother Adam (1968). ""Isle of Wight" or Acariñe disease: Its historical and practical aspects". Bee World. Vol. 49. pp. 6–18. doi:10.1080/0005772X.1968.11097180.
  76. Denwood, Philip (2012). Proceedings and Reports 2014 (PDF). SICAMM Conference 2012. sicamm.org. Landquart, Switzerland: Societas Internationalalis pro Conservatione Apis mellifera mellifera (SICAMM) (published 2014). Retrieved 16 November 2018.
  77. Prevention of Honey Bee Losses. 6th COLOSS Conference. September 2010. p. 29. Retrieved 6 February 2020.
  78. "The Bee Diseases and Pests Control (England) Order 2006". legislation.gov.uk. nationalarchives.gov.uk. Retrieved 6 February 2020.
  79. "The National Bee Unit". nationalbeeunit.com. NBU - The Animal and Plant Health Agency. Retrieved 6 February 2020.
  80. Yates, J.D.; Yates, B.D. (2012). Beekeeping Study Notes for the BBKA Examinations Volume 1 (Modules 1, 2 and 3) (2nd ed.). Northern Bee Books. p. 189. ISBN   978-0-905652-81-8.
  81. Ratnieks, Francis. "Update June 2017". lasiqueenbees.com. LASI Queen Bees. University of Sussex. Retrieved 6 February 2020.
  82. 1 2 3 4 Pritchard, Dorian J. (2016). "Grooming by honey bees as a component of varroa resistant behavior" (PDF). Journal of Apicultural Research. 55 (1): 38–48. doi:10.1080/00218839.2016.1196016. S2CID   88713988 . Retrieved 4 September 2019.
  83. Pritchard, Dorian (28 March 2016). "Selective breeding without inbreeding; where's the happy medium?". bibba.com. BIBBA. Retrieved 4 September 2019.
  84. Harbo, J.; Harris, J. (2001). "Resistance to Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) when mite-resistant queen honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) were free-mated with unselected drones". Journal of Economic Entomology. 94 (6): 1319–1323. doi:10.1603/0022-0493-94.6.1319. PMID   11777031. S2CID   13361316.
  85. "What does 'near-native' mean?". bibba.com. BIBBA. Retrieved 4 September 2019.
  86. Bak, Beata; Wilde, Jerzy (2015). "Grooming behavior by worker bees of various subspecies of honey bees to remove Varroa destructor mites". Journal of Apicultural Research. 54 (3): 207–215. doi:10.1080/00218839.2016.1147791. S2CID   87104735.
  87. 1 2 Siuda, Maciej; Bak, Beata; Wilde, Jerzy; Bratkowski, Janusz (2007). "Hygienic behaviour represented by European subspecies of honeybee (Apis mellifera l.)". Biuletyn Naukowy (28): 95–100. Retrieved 4 September 2019.
  88. 1 2 Kruitwagen, Astrid; van Langevelde, Frank; van Dooremalen, Coby; Blacquière, Tjeerd (2017). "Naturally selected honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies resistant to Varroa destructor do not groom more intensively". Journal of Apicultural Research. 56 (4): 354–365. doi: 10.1080/00218839.2017.1329797 . Retrieved 4 September 2019.
  89. Knight, Albert. "BIBBA History and Development". bibba.com/about/. BIBBA. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
  90. "Varroa Monitoring – count the mites accurately". nihbs.org. NIHBS. Retrieved 4 September 2019.
  91. "Vision of varroa tolerance in Cornwall, the peninsula". cbibbg.co.uk. CBIBBG. Retrieved 4 September 2019.