Hybrid (biology)

Last updated

A mule is a sterile hybrid of a male donkey and a female horse. Mules are smaller than horses but stronger than donkeys, making them useful as pack animals. Juancito.jpg
A mule is a sterile hybrid of a male donkey and a female horse. Mules are smaller than horses but stronger than donkeys, making them useful as pack animals.

In biology, a hybrid is the offspring resulting from combining the qualities of two organisms of different varieties, species or genera through sexual reproduction. Generally, it means that each cell has genetic material from two different organisms, whereas an individual where some cells are derived from a different organism is called a chimera. [1] Hybrids are not always intermediates between their parents (such as in blending inheritance), but can show hybrid vigor, sometimes growing larger or taller than either parent. The concept of a hybrid is interpreted differently in animal and plant breeding, where there is interest in the individual parentage. In genetics, attention is focused on the numbers of chromosomes. In taxonomy, a key question is how closely related the parent species are.

Contents

Species are reproductively isolated by strong barriers to hybridization, which include genetic and morphological differences, differing times of fertility, mating behaviors and cues, and physiological rejection of sperm cells or the developing embryo. Some act before fertilization and others after it. Similar barriers exist in plants, with differences in flowering times, pollen vectors, inhibition of pollen tube growth, somatoplastic sterility, cytoplasmic-genic male sterility and the structure of the chromosomes. A few animal species and many plant species, however, are the result of hybrid speciation, including important crop plants such as wheat, where the number of chromosomes has been doubled.

Human impact on the environment has resulted in an increase in the interbreeding between regional species, and the proliferation of introduced species worldwide has also resulted in an increase in hybridization. This genetic mixing may threaten many species with extinction, while genetic erosion from monoculture in crop plants may be damaging the gene pools of many species for future breeding. A form of often intentional human-mediated hybridization is the crossing of wild and domesticated species. This is common in both traditional horticulture and modern agriculture; many commercially useful fruits, flowers, garden herbs, and trees have been produced by hybridization. One such flower, Oenothera lamarckiana , was central to early genetics research into mutationism and polyploidy. It is also more occasionally done in the livestock and pet trades; some well-known wild × domestic hybrids are beefalo and wolfdogs. Human selective breeding of domesticated animals and plants has resulted in the development of distinct breeds (usually called cultivars in reference to plants); crossbreeds between them (without any wild stock) are sometimes also imprecisely referred to as "hybrids".

Hybrid humans existed in prehistory. For example, Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans are thought to have interbred as recently as 40,000 years ago.

Mythological hybrids appear in human culture in forms as diverse as the Minotaur, blends of animals, humans and mythical beasts such as centaurs and sphinxes, and the Nephilim of the Biblical apocrypha described as the wicked sons of fallen angels and attractive women.

Etymology

Liger, a lion/tiger hybrid bred in captivity Liger.jpg
Liger, a lion/tiger hybrid bred in captivity

The term hybrid is derived from Latin hybrida, used for crosses such as of a tame sow and a wild boar. The term came into popular use in English in the 19th century, though examples of its use have been found from the early 17th century. [2] Conspicuous hybrids are popularly named with portmanteau words, starting in the 1920s with the breeding of tiger–lion hybrids (liger and tigon). [3]

As seen by different disciplines

Animal and plant breeding

From the point of view of animal and plant breeders, there are several kinds of hybrid formed from crosses within a species, such as between different breeds. [4] Single cross hybrids result from the cross between two true-breeding organisms which produces an F1 hybrid (first filial generation). The cross between two different homozygous lines produces an F1 hybrid that is heterozygous; having two alleles, one contributed by each parent and typically one is dominant and the other recessive. Typically, the F1 generation is also phenotypically homogeneous, producing offspring that are all similar to each other. [5] Double cross hybrids result from the cross between two different F1 hybrids (i.e., there are four unrelated grandparents). [6] Three-way cross hybrids result from the cross between an F1 hybrid and an inbred line. Triple cross hybrids result from the crossing of two different three-way cross hybrids. [7] Top cross (or "topcross") hybrids result from the crossing of a top quality or pure-bred male and a lower quality female, intended to improve the quality of the offspring, on average. [8]

Population hybrids result from the crossing of plants or animals in one population with those of another population. These include interspecific hybrids or crosses between different breeds. [9] In biology, the result of crossing of two populations is called a synthetic population. [10]

In horticulture, the term stable hybrid is used to describe an annual plant that, if grown and bred in a small monoculture free of external pollen (e.g., an air-filtered greenhouse) produces offspring that are "true to type" with respect to phenotype; i.e., a true-breeding organism. [11]

Biogeography

Hybridization can occur in the hybrid zones where the geographical ranges of species, subspecies, or distinct genetic lineages overlap. For example, the butterfly Limenitis arthemis has two major subspecies in North America, L. a. arthemis (the white admiral) and L. a. astyanax (the red-spotted purple). The white admiral has a bright, white band on its wings, while the red-spotted purple has cooler blue-green shades. Hybridization occurs between a narrow area across New England, southern Ontario, and the Great Lakes, the "suture region". It is at these regions that the subspecies were formed. [12] Other hybrid zones have formed between described species of plants and animals.

Genetics

Oenothera lamarckiana is a permanent natural hybrid, studied intensively by the geneticist Hugo de Vries. Illustration by De Vries, 1913. Gruppenweise artbildung unter spezieller berucksichtigung der gattung Oenothera (Taf. II) (7164908226).jpg
Oenothera lamarckiana is a permanent natural hybrid, studied intensively by the geneticist Hugo de Vries. Illustration by De Vries, 1913.

From the point of view of genetics, several different kinds of hybrid can be distinguished. [13] [14] A genetic hybrid carries two different alleles of the same gene, where for instance one allele may code for a lighter coat colour than the other. [13] [14] A structural hybrid results from the fusion of gametes that have differing structure in at least one chromosome, as a result of structural abnormalities. [13] [14] A numerical hybrid results from the fusion of gametes having different haploid numbers of chromosomes. [13] [14] A permanent hybrid results when only the heterozygous genotype occurs, as in Oenothera lamarckiana , [15] because all homozygous combinations are lethal. [13] [14] In the early history of genetics, Hugo de Vries supposed these were caused by mutation. [16] [17]

Genetic complementation

Genetic complementation is a hybridization test widely used in genetics to determine whether two separately isolated mutants that have the same (or similar) phenotype are defective in the same gene or in different genes (see Complementation (genetics) article). [18] If a hybrid organism containing the genomes of two different mutant parental organisms displays a wild type phenotype, it is ordinarily considered that the two parental mutant organisms are defective in different genes. If the hybrid organism displays a distinctly mutant phenotype, the two mutant parental organisms are considered to be defective in the same gene. However, in some cases the hybrid organism may display a phenotype that is only weakly (or partially) wild-type, and this may reflect intragenic (interallelic) complementation.

Taxonomy

From the point of view of taxonomy, hybrids differ according to their parentage. Hybrids between different subspecies (such as between the Dog and Eurasian wolf) are called intra-specific hybrids. [19] Interspecific hybrids are the offspring from interspecies mating; [20] these sometimes result in hybrid speciation. [21] Intergeneric hybrids result from matings between different genera, such as between sheep and goats. [22] Interfamilial hybrids, such as between chickens and guineafowl or pheasants, are reliably described but extremely rare. [23] Interordinal hybrids (between different orders) are few, but have been engineered between the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (female) and the sand dollar Dendraster excentricus (male). [24]

Biology

Expression of parental traits

Hybrid between Lady Amherst's pheasant (Chrysolophus amherstiae) and another species, probably golden pheasant (Chrysolophus pictus) Exotic Pheasant (400938368).jpg
Hybrid between Lady Amherst's pheasant (Chrysolophus amherstiae) and another species, probably golden pheasant (Chrysolophus pictus)

When two distinct types of organisms breed with each other, the resulting hybrids typically have intermediate traits (e.g., one plant parent has red flowers, the other has white, and the hybrid, pink flowers). [25] Commonly, hybrids also combine traits seen only separately in one parent or the other (e.g., a bird hybrid might combine the yellow head of one parent with the orange belly of the other). [25]

Mechanisms of reproductive isolation

Interspecific hybrids are bred by mating individuals from two species, normally from within the same genus. The offspring display traits and characteristics of both parents, but are often sterile, preventing gene flow between the species. [26] Sterility is often attributed to the different number of chromosomes between the two species. For example, donkeys have 62 chromosomes, horses have 64 chromosomes, and mules or hinnies have 63 chromosomes. Mules, hinnies, and other normally sterile interspecific hybrids cannot produce viable gametes, because differences in chromosome structure prevent appropriate pairing and segregation during meiosis, meiosis is disrupted, and viable sperm and eggs are not formed. However, fertility in female mules has been reported with a donkey as the father. [27]

A variety of mechanisms limit the success of hybridization, including the large genetic difference between most species. Barriers include morphological differences, differing times of fertility, mating behaviors and cues, and physiological rejection of sperm cells or the developing embryo. Some act before fertilization; others after it. [28] [29] [30] [31]

In plants, some barriers to hybridization include blooming period differences, different pollinator vectors, inhibition of pollen tube growth, somatoplastic sterility, cytoplasmic-genic male sterility and structural differences of the chromosomes. [32]

Speciation

Durum wheat is tetraploid, derived from wild emmer wheat, which is a hybrid of two diploid wild grasses, Triticum urartu and a wild goatgrass such as Aegilops searsii or Ae. speltoides. Triticum durum.jpg
Durum wheat is tetraploid, derived from wild emmer wheat, which is a hybrid of two diploid wild grasses, Triticum urartu and a wild goatgrass such as Aegilops searsii or Ae. speltoides .

A few animal species are the result of hybridization. The Lonicera fly is a natural hybrid. The American red wolf appears to be a hybrid of the gray wolf and the coyote, [34] although its taxonomic status has been a subject of controversy. [35] [36] [37] The European edible frog is a semi-permanent hybrid between pool frogs and marsh frogs; its population requires the continued presence of at least one of the parent species. [38] Cave paintings indicate that the European bison is a natural hybrid of the aurochs and the steppe bison. [39] [40]

Plant hybridization is more commonplace compared to animal hybridization. Many crop species are hybrids, including notably the polyploid wheats: some have four sets of chromosomes (tetraploid) or six (hexaploid), while other wheat species have (like most eukaryotic organisms) two sets (diploid), so hybridization events likely involved the doubling of chromosome sets, causing immediate genetic isolation. [41]

Hybridization may be important in speciation in some plant groups. However, homoploid hybrid speciation (not increasing the number of sets of chromosomes) may be rare: by 1997, only eight natural examples had been fully described. Experimental studies suggest that hybridization offers a rapid route to speciation, a prediction confirmed by the fact that early generation hybrids and ancient hybrid species have matching genomes, meaning that once hybridization has occurred, the new hybrid genome can remain stable. [42]

Many hybrid zones are known where the ranges of two species meet, and hybrids are continually produced in great numbers. These hybrid zones are useful as biological model systems for studying the mechanisms of speciation. Recently DNA analysis of a bear shot by a hunter in the Northwest Territories confirmed the existence of naturally occurring and fertile grizzly–polar bear hybrids. [43]

Hybrid vigour

Hybrid vigour: Salvia jurisicii x nutans hybrids (top centre, with flowers) are taller than their parents Salvia jurisicii (centre tray) or Salvia nutans (top left). Salvia jurisicii x nutans - Flickr - peganum.jpg
Hybrid vigour: Salvia jurisicii x nutans hybrids (top centre, with flowers) are taller than their parents Salvia jurisicii (centre tray) or Salvia nutans (top left).

Hybridization between reproductively isolated species often results in hybrid offspring with lower fitness than either parental. However, hybrids are not, as might be expected, always intermediate between their parents (as if there were blending inheritance), but are sometimes stronger or perform better than either parental lineage or variety, a phenomenon called heterosis, hybrid vigour, or heterozygote advantage. This is most common with plant hybrids. [44] A transgressive phenotype is a phenotype that displays more extreme characteristics than either of the parent lines. [45] Plant breeders use several techniques to produce hybrids, including line breeding and the formation of complex hybrids. An economically important example is hybrid maize (corn), which provides a considerable seed yield advantage over open pollinated varieties. Hybrid seed dominates the commercial maize seed market in the United States, Canada and many other major maize-producing countries. [46]

In a hybrid, any trait that falls outside the range of parental variation (and is thus not simply intermediate between its parents) is considered heterotic. Positive heterosis produces more robust hybrids, they might be stronger or bigger; while the term negative heterosis refers to weaker or smaller hybrids. [47] Heterosis is common in both animal and plant hybrids. For example, hybrids between a lion and a tigress ("ligers") are much larger than either of the two progenitors, while "tigons" (lioness × tiger) are smaller. Similarly, the hybrids between the common pheasant ( Phasianus colchicus ) and domestic fowl ( Gallus gallus ) are larger than either of their parents, as are those produced between the common pheasant and hen golden pheasant ( Chrysolophus pictus ). [48] Spurs are absent in hybrids of the former type, although present in both parents. [49]

Human influence

Anthropogenic hybridization

Hybridization is greatly influenced by human impact on the environment, [50] through effects such as habitat fragmentation and species introductions. [51] Such impacts make it difficult to conserve the genetics of populations undergoing introgressive hybridization. Humans have introduced species worldwide to environments for a long time, both intentionally for purposes such as biological control, and unintentionally, as with accidental escapes of individuals. Introductions can drastically affect populations, including through hybridization. [14] [52]

Management

Examples of hybrid flowers from hybrid swarms of Aquilegia pubescens and Aquilegia formosa Aquilegia pubescens-formosa hybrid-swarm flowers close.jpg
Examples of hybrid flowers from hybrid swarms of Aquilegia pubescens and Aquilegia formosa

There is a kind of continuum with three semi-distinct categories dealing with anthropogenic hybridization: hybridization without introgression, hybridization with widespread introgression (backcrossing with one of the parent species), and hybrid swarms (highly variable populations with much interbreeding as well as backcrossing with the parent species). Depending on where a population falls along this continuum, the management plans for that population will change. Hybridization is currently an area of great discussion within wildlife management and habitat management. Global climate change is creating other changes such as difference in population distributions which are indirect causes for an increase in anthropogenic hybridization. [50]

Conservationists disagree on when is the proper time to give up on a population that is becoming a hybrid swarm, or to try and save the still existing pure individuals. Once a population becomes a complete mixture, the goal becomes to conserve those hybrids to avoid their loss. Conservationists treat each case on its merits, depending on detecting hybrids within the population. It is nearly impossible to formulate a uniform hybridization policy, because hybridization can occur beneficially when it occurs "naturally", and when hybrid swarms are the only remaining evidence of prior species, they need to be conserved as well. [50]

Genetic mixing and extinction

Regionally developed ecotypes can be threatened with extinction when new alleles or genes are introduced that alter that ecotype. This is sometimes called genetic mixing. [53] Hybridization and introgression, which can happen in natural and hybrid populations, of new genetic material can lead to the replacement of local genotypes if the hybrids are more fit and have breeding advantages over the indigenous ecotype or species. These hybridization events can result from the introduction of non-native genotypes by humans or through habitat modification, bringing previously isolated species into contact. Genetic mixing can be especially detrimental for rare species in isolated habitats, ultimately affecting the population to such a degree that none of the originally genetically distinct population remains. [54] [55]

Effect on biodiversity and food security

The Green Revolution of the 20th century relied on hybridization to create high-yielding varieties, along with increased reliance on inputs of fertilizers, pesticides, and irrigation. Irrigation1.jpg
The Green Revolution of the 20th century relied on hybridization to create high-yielding varieties, along with increased reliance on inputs of fertilizers, pesticides, and irrigation.

In agriculture and animal husbandry, the Green Revolution's use of conventional hybridization increased yields by breeding "high-yielding varieties". The replacement of locally indigenous breeds, compounded with unintentional cross-pollination and crossbreeding (genetic mixing), has reduced the gene pools of various wild and indigenous breeds resulting in the loss of genetic diversity. [57] Since the indigenous breeds are often well-adapted to local extremes in climate and have immunity to local pathogens, this can be a significant genetic erosion of the gene pool for future breeding. Therefore, commercial plant geneticists strive to breed "widely adapted" cultivars to counteract this tendency. [58]

Different taxa

In animals

Mammals

Familiar examples of equid hybrids are the mule, a cross between a female horse and a male donkey, and the hinny, a cross between a female donkey and a male horse. Pairs of complementary types like the mule and hinny are called reciprocal hybrids. [59] Polar bears and brown bears are another case of a hybridizing species pairs, [60] and introgression among non-sister species of bears appears to have shaped the Ursidae family tree. [61] Among many other mammal crosses are hybrid camels, crosses between a bactrian camel and a dromedary. [62] There are many examples of felid hybrids, including the liger. The oldest-known animal hybrid bred by humans is the kunga equid hybrid produced as a draft animal and status symbol 4,500 years ago to ancient Syria. [63]

The first known instance of hybrid speciation in marine mammals was discovered in 2014. The clymene dolphin (Stenella clymene) is a hybrid of two Atlantic species, the spinner and striped dolphins. [64] In 2019, scientists confirmed that a skull found 30 years earlier was a hybrid between the beluga whale and narwhal, dubbed the narluga. [65]

Birds

Cagebird breeders sometimes breed bird hybrids known as mules between species of finch, such as goldfinch × canary. [66]

Amphibians

Among amphibians, Japanese giant salamanders and Chinese giant salamanders have created hybrids that threaten the survival of Japanese giant salamanders because of competition for similar resources in Japan. [67]

Fish

Among fish, a group of about fifty natural hybrids between Australian blacktip shark and the larger common blacktip shark was found by Australia's eastern coast in 2012. [68]

Russian sturgeon and American paddlefish were hybridized in captivity when sperm from the paddlefish and eggs from the sturgeon were combined, unexpectedly resulting in viable offspring. This hybrid is called a sturddlefish. [69] [70]

Cephalochordates

The two genera Asymmetron and Branchiostoma are able to produce viable hybrid offspring, even if none have lived into adulthood so far, despite the parents' common ancestor living tens of millions of years ago. [71] [72]

Insects

Among insects, so-called killer bees were accidentally created during an attempt to breed a strain of bees that would both produce more honey and be better adapted to tropical conditions. It was done by crossing a European honey bee and an African bee. [73]

The Colias eurytheme and C. philodice butterflies have retained enough genetic compatibility to produce viable hybrid offspring. [74] Hybrid speciation may have produced the diverse Heliconius butterflies, [75] but that is disputed. [76]

The two closely related harvester ant species Pogonomyrmex barbatus and Pogonomyrmex rugosus have evolved to depend on hybridization. When a queen fertilizes her eggs with sperm from males of her own species, the offspring is always new queens. And when she fertilizes the eggs with sperm from males of the other species, the offspring is always sterile worker ants (and because ants are haplodiploid, unfertilized eggs become males). Without mating with males of the other species, the queens are unable to produce workers, and will fail to establish a colony of their own. [77]

In plants

The London plane, Platanus x acerifolia, is a natural hybrid, popular for street planting. Platanus xhispanica in Lucenec9.jpg
The London plane, Platanus × acerifolia, is a natural hybrid, popular for street planting.

Plant species hybridize more readily than animal species, and the resulting hybrids are fertile more often. Many plant species are the result of hybridization, combined with polyploidy, which duplicates the chromosomes. Chromosome duplication allows orderly meiosis and so viable seed can be produced. [78]

Plant hybrids are generally given names that include an "×" (not in italics), such as Platanus × acerifolia for the London plane, a natural hybrid of P. orientalis (oriental plane) and P. occidentalis (American sycamore). [79] [80] The parent's names may be kept in their entirety, as seen in Prunus persica × Prunus americana , with the female parent's name given first, or if not known, the parent's names given alphabetically. [81]

Plant species that are genetically compatible may not hybridize in nature for various reasons, including geographical isolation, differences in flowering period, or differences in pollinators. Species that are brought together by humans in gardens may hybridize naturally, or hybridization can be facilitated by human efforts, such as altered flowering period or artificial pollination. Hybrids are sometimes created by humans to produce improved plants that have some of the characteristics of each of the parent species. Much work is now being done with hybrids between crops and their wild relatives to improve disease resistance or climate resilience for both agricultural and horticultural crops. [82]

Some crop plants are hybrids from different genera (intergeneric hybrids), such as Triticale, × Triticosecale, a wheat–rye hybrid. [83] Most modern and ancient wheat breeds are themselves hybrids; bread wheat, Triticum aestivum, is a hexaploid hybrid of three wild grasses. [33] Several commercial fruits including loganberry (Rubus × loganobaccus) [84] and grapefruit (Citrus × paradisi) [85] are hybrids, as are garden herbs such as peppermint (Mentha × piperita), [86] and trees such as the London plane (Platanus × acerifolia). [87] [88] Among many natural plant hybrids is Iris albicans , a sterile hybrid that spreads by rhizome division, [89] and Oenothera lamarckiana , a flower that was the subject of important experiments by Hugo de Vries that produced an understanding of polyploidy. [15]

Sterility in a non-polyploid hybrid is often a result of chromosome number; if parents are of differing chromosome pair number, the offspring will have an odd number of chromosomes, which leaves them unable to produce chromosomally balanced gametes. [91] While that is undesirable in a crop such as wheat, for which growing a crop that produces no seeds would be pointless, it is an attractive attribute in some fruits. Triploid bananas and watermelons are intentionally bred because they produce no seeds and are also parthenocarpic. [92]

In humans

Oase 2 skull may be a human-Neanderthal hybrid. Oase 2-Homo Sapiens.jpg
Oase 2 skull may be a human-Neanderthal hybrid.

There is evidence of hybridization between modern humans and other species of the genus Homo . In 2010, the Neanderthal genome project showed that 1–4% of DNA from all people living today, apart from most Sub-Saharan Africans, is of Neanderthal heritage. Analyzing the genomes of 600 Europeans and East Asians found that combining them covered 20% of the Neanderthal genome that is in the modern human population. [93] Ancient human populations lived and interbred with Neanderthals, Denisovans, and at least one other extinct Homo species. [94] Thus, Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA has been incorporated into human DNA by introgression. [95]

In 1998, a complete prehistorical skeleton found in Portugal, the Lapedo child, had features of both anatomically modern humans and Neanderthals. [96] Some ancient human skulls with especially large nasal cavities and unusually shaped braincases represent human-Neanderthal hybrids. A 37,000- to 42,000-year-old human jawbone found in Romania's Oase cave contains traces of Neanderthal ancestry [lower-alpha 1] from only four to six generations earlier. [98] All genes from Neanderthals in the current human population are descended from Neanderthal fathers and human mothers. [99]

Mythology

The Minotaur of ancient Greek mythology was (in one version of the myth) supposedly the offspring of Pasiphae and a white bull. Statue of the Minotaur (Roman copy after an original by Myron) at the National Archaeological Museum of Athens on 3 April 2018.jpg
The Minotaur of ancient Greek mythology was (in one version of the myth) supposedly the offspring of Pasiphaë and a white bull.

Folk tales and myths sometimes contain mythological hybrids; the Minotaur was the offspring of a human, Pasiphaë, and a white bull. [100] More often, they are composites of the physical attributes of two or more kinds of animals, mythical beasts, and humans, with no suggestion that they are the result of interbreeding, as in the centaur (man/horse), chimera (goat/lion/snake), hippocamp (fish/horse), and sphinx (woman/lion). [101] The Old Testament mentions a first generation of half-human hybrid giants, the Nephilim, [102] [103] while the apocryphal Book of Enoch describes the Nephilim as the wicked sons of fallen angels and attractive women. [104]

See also

Notes

  1. Signs of Neanderthal lineage include a wide jaw and large teeth that get bigger toward the back of the mouth. [97]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genetics</span> Science of genes, heredity, and variation in living organisms

Genetics is the study of genes, genetic variation, and heredity in organisms. It is an important branch in biology because heredity is vital to organisms' evolution. Gregor Mendel, a Moravian Augustinian friar working in the 19th century in Brno, was the first to study genetics scientifically. Mendel studied "trait inheritance", patterns in the way traits are handed down from parents to offspring over time. He observed that organisms inherit traits by way of discrete "units of inheritance". This term, still used today, is a somewhat ambiguous definition of what is referred to as a gene.

Microevolution is the change in allele frequencies that occurs over time within a population. This change is due to four different processes: mutation, selection, gene flow and genetic drift. This change happens over a relatively short amount of time compared to the changes termed macroevolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mendelian inheritance</span> Type of biological inheritance

Mendelian inheritance is a type of biological inheritance following the principles originally proposed by Gregor Mendel in 1865 and 1866, re-discovered in 1900 by Hugo de Vries and Carl Correns, and later popularized by William Bateson. These principles were initially controversial. When Mendel's theories were integrated with the Boveri–Sutton chromosome theory of inheritance by Thomas Hunt Morgan in 1915, they became the core of classical genetics. Ronald Fisher combined these ideas with the theory of natural selection in his 1930 book The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, putting evolution onto a mathematical footing and forming the basis for population genetics within the modern evolutionary synthesis.

Speciation is the evolutionary process by which populations evolve to become distinct species. The biologist Orator F. Cook coined the term in 1906 for cladogenesis, the splitting of lineages, as opposed to anagenesis, phyletic evolution within lineages. Charles Darwin was the first to describe the role of natural selection in speciation in his 1859 book On the Origin of Species. He also identified sexual selection as a likely mechanism, but found it problematic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polyploidy</span> Condition where cells of an organism have more than two paired sets of chromosomes

Polyploidy is a condition in which the cells of an organism have more than one pair of (homologous) chromosomes. Most species whose cells have nuclei (eukaryotes) are diploid, meaning they have two complete sets of chromosomes, one from each of two parents; each set contains the same number of chromosomes, and the chromosomes are joined in pairs of homologous chromosomes. However, some organisms are polyploid. Polyploidy is especially common in plants. Most eukaryotes have diploid somatic cells, but produce haploid gametes by meiosis. A monoploid has only one set of chromosomes, and the term is usually only applied to cells or organisms that are normally diploid. Males of bees and other Hymenoptera, for example, are monoploid. Unlike animals, plants and multicellular algae have life cycles with two alternating multicellular generations. The gametophyte generation is haploid, and produces gametes by mitosis; the sporophyte generation is diploid and produces spores by meiosis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gene flow</span> Transfer of genetic variation from one population to another

In population genetics, gene flow is the transfer of genetic material from one population to another. If the rate of gene flow is high enough, then two populations will have equivalent allele frequencies and therefore can be considered a single effective population. It has been shown that it takes only "one migrant per generation" to prevent populations from diverging due to drift. Populations can diverge due to selection even when they are exchanging alleles, if the selection pressure is strong enough. Gene flow is an important mechanism for transferring genetic diversity among populations. Migrants change the distribution of genetic diversity among populations, by modifying allele frequencies. High rates of gene flow can reduce the genetic differentiation between the two groups, increasing homogeneity. For this reason, gene flow has been thought to constrain speciation and prevent range expansion by combining the gene pools of the groups, thus preventing the development of differences in genetic variation that would have led to differentiation and adaptation. In some cases dispersal resulting in gene flow may also result in the addition of novel genetic variants under positive selection to the gene pool of a species or population

Heterosis, hybrid vigor, or outbreeding enhancement is the improved or increased function of any biological quality in a hybrid offspring. An offspring is heterotic if its traits are enhanced as a result of mixing the genetic contributions of its parents. The heterotic offspring often has traits that are more than the simple addition of the parents' traits, and can be explained by Mendelian or non-Mendelian inheritance. Typical heterotic/hybrid traits of interest in agriculture are higher yield, quicker maturity, stability, drought tolerance etc.

Backcrossing is a crossing of a hybrid with one of its parents or an individual genetically similar to its parent, to achieve offspring with a genetic identity closer to that of the parent. It is used in horticulture, animal breeding, and production of gene knockout organisms.

An F1 hybrid (also known as filial 1 hybrid) is the first filial generation of offspring of distinctly different parental types. F1 hybrids are used in genetics, and in selective breeding, where the term F1 crossbreed may be used. The term is sometimes written with a subscript, as F1 hybrid. Subsequent generations are called F2, F3, etc.

Evidence of common descent of living organisms has been discovered by scientists researching in a variety of disciplines over many decades, demonstrating that all life on Earth comes from a single ancestor. This forms an important part of the evidence on which evolutionary theory rests, demonstrates that evolution does occur, and illustrates the processes that created Earth's biodiversity. It supports the modern evolutionary synthesis—the current scientific theory that explains how and why life changes over time. Evolutionary biologists document evidence of common descent, all the way back to the last universal common ancestor, by developing testable predictions, testing hypotheses, and constructing theories that illustrate and describe its causes.

Inbreeding depression is the reduced biological fitness that has the potential to result from inbreeding. Biological fitness refers to an organism's ability to survive and perpetuate its genetic material. Inbreeding depression is often the result of a population bottleneck. In general, the higher the genetic variation or gene pool within a breeding population, the less likely it is to suffer from inbreeding depression, though inbreeding and outbreeding depression can simultaneously occur.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Introgression</span> Transfer of genetic material from one species to another

Introgression, also known as introgressive hybridization, in genetics is the transfer of genetic material from one species into the gene pool of another by the repeated backcrossing of an interspecific hybrid with one of its parent species. Introgression is a long-term process, even when artificial; it may take many hybrid generations before significant backcrossing occurs. This process is distinct from most forms of gene flow in that it occurs between two populations of different species, rather than two populations of the same species.

The mechanisms of reproductive isolation are a collection of evolutionary mechanisms, behaviors and physiological processes critical for speciation. They prevent members of different species from producing offspring, or ensure that any offspring are sterile. These barriers maintain the integrity of a species by reducing gene flow between related species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hybrid speciation</span> Form of speciation involving hybridization between two different species

Hybrid speciation is a form of speciation where hybridization between two different species leads to a new species, reproductively isolated from the parent species. Previously, reproductive isolation between two species and their parents was thought to be particularly difficult to achieve, and thus hybrid species were thought to be very rare. With DNA analysis becoming more accessible in the 1990s, hybrid speciation has been shown to be a somewhat common phenomenon, particularly in plants. In botanical nomenclature, a hybrid species is also called a nothospecies. Hybrid species are by their nature polyphyletic.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to genetics:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plant genetics</span> Study of genes and heredity in plants

Plant genetics is the study of genes, genetic variation, and heredity specifically in plants. It is generally considered a field of biology and botany, but intersects frequently with many other life sciences and is strongly linked with the study of information systems. Plant genetics is similar in many ways to animal genetics but differs in a few key areas.

Classical genetics is the branch of genetics based solely on visible results of reproductive acts. It is the oldest discipline in the field of genetics, going back to the experiments on Mendelian inheritance by Gregor Mendel who made it possible to identify the basic mechanisms of heredity. Subsequently, these mechanisms have been studied and explained at the molecular level.

This glossary of genetics and evolutionary biology is a list of definitions of terms and concepts used in the study of genetics and evolutionary biology, as well as sub-disciplines and related fields, with an emphasis on classical genetics, quantitative genetics, population biology, phylogenetics, speciation, and systematics. Overlapping and related terms can be found in Glossary of cellular and molecular biology, Glossary of ecology, and Glossary of biology.

Hybrid incompatibility is a phenomenon in plants and animals, wherein offspring produced by the mating of two different species or populations have reduced viability and/or are less able to reproduce. Examples of hybrids include mules and ligers from the animal world, and subspecies of the Asian rice crop Oryza sativa from the plant world. Multiple models have been developed to explain this phenomenon. Recent research suggests that the source of this incompatibility is largely genetic, as combinations of genes and alleles prove lethal to the hybrid organism. Incompatibility is not solely influenced by genetics, however, and can be affected by environmental factors such as temperature. The genetic underpinnings of hybrid incompatibility may provide insight into factors responsible for evolutionary divergence between species.

Eukaryote hybrid genomes result from interspecific hybridization, where closely related species mate and produce offspring with admixed genomes. The advent of large-scale genomic sequencing has shown that hybridization is common, and that it may represent an important source of novel variation. Although most interspecific hybrids are sterile or less fit than their parents, some may survive and reproduce, enabling the transfer of adaptive variants across the species boundary, and even result in the formation of novel evolutionary lineages. There are two main variants of hybrid species genomes: allopolyploid, which have one full chromosome set from each parent species, and homoploid, which are a mosaic of the parent species genomes with no increase in chromosome number.

References

  1. Taddeo, Sarah; Robert, Jason S. (4 November 2014). "'Hybrids and Chimeras: A Consultation on the Ethical and Social Implications of Creating Human/Animal Embryos in Research' 2007, by the HFEA". The Embryo Project. Arizona State University.
  2. "Hybrid". Online Etymology Dictionary. Archived from the original on 16 March 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
  3. "When the sire is a lion the result is termed a Liger, while the converse is a Tigon." Edward George Boulenger, World natural history, B. T. Batsford ltd., 1937, p. 40
  4. Wricke, Gunter; Weber, Eberhard (1986). Quantitative genetics and selection in plant breeding. W. de Gruyter. p. 257.
  5. Runge, Marschall S.; Patterson, Cam, eds. (2006). Principles of Molecular Medicine. Humana Press. p. 58. ISBN   9781588292025. Archived from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 27 May 2017.
  6. Rawlings, J. O.; Cockerham, C. Clark (June 1962). "Analysis of Double Cross Hybrid Populations". Biometrics. 18 (2): 229–244. doi:10.2307/2527461. JSTOR   2527461.
  7. Thompson, K. F. (1964). "Triple-cross hybrid kale". Euphytica. 13 (2): 173. doi:10.1007/BF00033306. S2CID   30141635. Archived from the original on 10 April 2017. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
  8. "Topcross". Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 21 March 2017. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
  9. McCarthy, Eugene M. "Hybrid Populations". Macroevolution. Archived from the original on 21 March 2017. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
  10. Grenier, Cécile; Cao, Tuong-Vi; Ospina, Yolima; Quintero, Constanza; Châtel, Marc Henri; Tohme, Joe; Courtois, Brigitte; Ahmadi, Nourollah (27 August 2015). "Accuracy of Genomic Selection in a Rice Synthetic Population Developed for Recurrent Selection Breeding". PLOS ONE. 10 (8): e0136594. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1036594G. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136594 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   4551487 . PMID   26313446.
  11. Toogood, A., ed. (1999). Plant Propagation. American Horticultural Society. p.  21. ISBN   9780789455208.
  12. Ries, Leslie; Mullen, Sean P. (2008). "A Rare Model Limits the Distribution of Its More Common Mimic: A Twist on Frequency-Dependent Batesian Mimicry". Evolution. 62 (7): 1798–803. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00401.x. PMID   18410533. S2CID   42438552.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 Rieger, R.; Michaelis, A.; Green, M. M. (1991). Glossary of Genetics: Classical and Molecular (5th ed.). Springer-Verlag. p.  256. ISBN   9780387520544.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Allendorf, Fred (2007). Conservation and the Genetics of Populations. Blackwell. p. 534.
  15. 1 2 Sirks, M. J. (2013). General Genetics. Springer. p. 408. ISBN   9789401575874. Archived from the original on 20 March 2017. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
  16. De Vries, Hugo (1901–1903). Die mutationstheorie (in German). Vol. I and II. Leipzig: Von Veit.
  17. de Vries, Hugo (January 1919). "Oenothera rubrinervis: A Half Mutant". Botanical Gazette. 67 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1086/332396. JSTOR   2468868. S2CID   83752035. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 23 August 2020.
  18. Fincham, J. R. S. (April 1968). "Genetic Complementation". Science Progress. 56 (222): 165–177. OCLC   239023. PMID   4879184.
  19. Allendorf, Fred (2007). Conservation and the Genetics of Populations. Blackwell. pp. 421–448.
  20. Keeton, William T. (1980). Biological Science. Norton. p.  A9. ISBN   9780393950212.
  21. Arnold, M. L. (1996). Natural Hybridisation and Evolution. Oxford University Press. p. 232. ISBN   9780195099751.
  22. Kelk, Dawn A.; Gartley, Cathy J.; Buckrell, Brian C.; King, W. Allan (1997). "The interbreeding of sheep and goats". Canadian Veterinary Journal. 38 (4): 235–237. PMC   1576582 . PMID   9105723.
  23. Johnsgard, Paul A. (1983). "Hybridisation & Zoogeographic Patterns in Pheasants". University of Nebraska - Lincoln. p. 5. Archived from the original on 17 August 2017. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
  24. Giudice, Giovanni (2012). Developmental Biology of the Sea Urchin Embryo. Elsevier. p. 171. ISBN   9780323148788. Archived from the original on 11 July 2020. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
  25. 1 2 McCarthy, Eugene M. (2006). Handbook of Avian Hybrids of the World. Oxford University Press. pp. 16–17.
  26. Keeton, William T. (1980). Biological Science. New York: Norton. p. 800. ISBN   9780393950212.
  27. Rong, R.; Chandley, A. C.; Song, J.; McBeath, S.; Tan, P. P.; Bai, Q.; Speed, R. M. (1988). "A fertile mule and hinny in China". Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics. 47 (3): 134–9. doi:10.1159/000132531. PMID   3378453.
  28. Baker, H. G. (1959). "Reproductive methods as factors in speciation in flowering plants". Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 24: 177–191. doi:10.1101/sqb.1959.024.01.019. PMID   13796002.
  29. Barton, N.; Bengtsson, B. O. (1986). "The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations". Heredity. 57 (3): 357–376. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1986.135 . PMID   3804765. S2CID   28978466.
  30. Strickberger, M. (1978). Genética (in Spanish). Barcelona: Omega. pp. 874–879. ISBN   9788428203692.
  31. Futuyma, D. (1998). Evolutionary Biology (3rd ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer.
  32. Hermsen, J. G. Th.; Ramanna, M. S. (January 1976). "Barriers to hybridisation of Solanum bulbocastanum Dun. and S. Verrucosum Schlechtd. and structural hybridity in their F1 plants". Euphytica. 25 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1007/BF00041523. S2CID   37518270.
  33. 1 2 Gornicki, Piotr; et al. (2014). "The chloroplast view of the evolution of polyploid wheat". New Phytologist. 204 (3): 704–714. doi:10.1111/nph.12931. PMID   25059383.
  34. Esch, Mary (31 May 2011). "Study: Eastern wolves are hybrids with coyotes". Boston.com. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 22 March 2017. Retrieved 22 March 2017.
  35. Rutledge, Linda Y.; et al. (2012). "Conservation genomics in perspective: A holistic approach to understanding Canis evolution in North America" (PDF). Biological Conservation. 155: 186–192. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.05.017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.[ permanent dead link ]
  36. Chambers, Steven M.; et al. (2012). "An account of the taxonomy of North American wolves from morphological and genetic analyses". North American Fauna. 77: 1–67. doi: 10.3996/nafa.77.0001 .
  37. Dumbacher, J. (January 2014). "Review of Proposed Rule Regarding Status of the Wolf Under the Endangered Species Act" (PDF). FWS.gov. NCEAS. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 June 2014.
  38. Frost, Grant; et al. (15 March 2006). "The amphibian tree of life". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 297 (297): 1–291. doi: 10.1206/0003-0090(2006)297[0001:TATOL]2.0.CO;2 . S2CID   86140137.
  39. Soubrier, Julien; et al. (18 October 2016). "Early cave art and ancient DNA record the origin of European bison". Nature Communications. 7: 13158. Bibcode:2016NatCo...713158S. doi:10.1038/ncomms13158. PMC   5071849 . PMID   27754477.
  40. Daley, Jason. "Cave Paintings Help Unravel the Mystery of the 'Higgs Bison'". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on 21 October 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2016.
  41. Hancock, James F. (2004). Plant Evolution and the Origin of Crop Species. CABI Publishing. ISBN   9780851996851.
  42. Rieseberg, Loren H. (1997). "Hybrid Origins of Plant Species". Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 28: 359–389. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.718.9871 . doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.359.
  43. "Hybrid bear shot dead in Canada". BBC News. 13 May 2006. Archived from the original on 22 June 2006. Retrieved 10 June 2006.
  44. Stokes, David (July 2007). "Evaluating the utility of Arabidopsis thaliana as a model for understanding heterosis in hybrid crops". Euphytica. 156 (1–2): 157–171. doi:10.1007/s10681-007-9362-1. S2CID   22964055.
  45. Rieseberg, Loren H.; Archer, Margaret A.; Wayne, Robert K. (July 1999). "Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation". Heredity. 83 (4): 363–372. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6886170 . PMID   10583537. S2CID   2651616.
  46. Smith, C. Wayne (2004). Corn: Origin, History, Technology, and Production. Wiley. p. 332.
  47. McCarthy, Eugene M. (2006). Handbook of Avian Hybrids of the World. Oxford University Press. p. 17. ISBN   9780195183238.
  48. Darwin, Charles (1868). Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. Vol. II. p. 125.
  49. Spicer, J. W. G. (1854). "Note on hybrid gallinaceous birds". The Zoologist. 12: 4294–4296.
  50. 1 2 3 Allendorf, Fred W.; Leary, R. F.; Spruell, P.; Wenburg, J. K. (2001). "The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 16 (11): 613–622. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02290-X.
  51. Ehrlich, Paul; Holdren, John (26 March 1971). "Impact of population Growth". Science. 171 (3977): 1212–1216. Bibcode:1971Sci...171.1212E. doi:10.1126/science.171.3977.1212. PMID   5545198.
  52. Vitousek, Peter; et al. (1997). "Introduced Species: A Significant Component of Human-cause Global Change". New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 21 (1): 1–16.
  53. Mooney, H. A.; Cleland, E. E. (2001). "The evolutionary impact of invasive species". PNAS. 98 (10): 5446–5451. Bibcode:2001PNAS...98.5446M. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091093398 . PMC   33232 . PMID   11344292.
  54. Rhymer, J. M.; Simberloff, D. (1996). "Extinction by Hybridization and Introgression". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 27: 83–109. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.83.
  55. Potts, Brad M.; Barbour, Robert C.; Hingston, Andrew B. (2001). Genetic Pollution from Farm Forestry using eucalypt species and hybrids:A report for RIRDC/L&WA/FWPRDC Joint Venture Agroforestry Program (PDF). Rural Industrial Research and Development Corporation, Australian Government. ISBN   9780642583369. ISSN   1440-6845. RIRDC Publication No. 01/114; RIRDC Project No CPF - 3A. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 January 2004.
  56. Farmer, B. H. (1986). "Perspectives on the 'Green Revolution' in South Asia". Modern Asian Studies. 20 (1): 175–199. doi:10.1017/s0026749x00013627. S2CID   145626108.
  57. "Genetic Pollution: The Great Genetic Scandal" Devinder Sharma Archived 18 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine ; Bulletin 28
  58. Troyer, A. Forrest. Breeding Widely Adapted Cultivars: Examples from Maize. Encyclopedia of Plant and Crop Science, 27 February 2004.
  59. Griesbach, Robert J. (1986). "That Reciprocal Cross — Is It a Mule or Hinny?" (PDF). Awards Quarterly. 17 (3): 149. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 March 2017. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
  60. Hailer, F.; Kutschera, V. E.; Hallstrom, B. M.; Klassert, D.; Fain, S. R.; Leonard, J. A.; Arnason, U.; Janke, A. (2012). "Nuclear Genomic Sequences Reveal that Polar Bears Are an Old and Distinct Bear Lineage". Science. 336 (6079): 344–347. Bibcode:2012Sci...336..344H. doi:10.1126/science.1216424. hdl: 10261/58578 . PMID   22517859. S2CID   12671275.
  61. Kutschera, V. E.; Bidon, T.; Hailer, F.; Rodi, J.; Fain, S. R.; Janke, A. (2014). "Bears in a forest of gene trees: phylogenetic inference is complicated by incomplete lineage sorting and gene flow". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 31 (8): 2004–2017. doi:10.1093/molbev/msu186. PMC   4104321 . PMID   24903145.
  62. Bulliet, R. W. (1975). The Camel and the Wheel . Columbia University Press. pp.  164–175. ISBN   9780674091306.
  63. "Part donkey, part wild ass, the kunga is the oldest known hybrid bred by humans". Science News. 14 January 2022. Retrieved 14 January 2022.
  64. Bhanoo, Sindya (13 January 2014). "Scientists Find Rare Hybrid of Two Other Dolphin Species". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 29 May 2020. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
  65. Kovrind, Mikkel; eight others. "Hybridization between two high Arctic cetaceans confirmed by genomic analysis". Archived from the original on 11 June 2020. Retrieved 6 June 2020.
  66. "British Mule/Hybrid". Severn Counties Foreign & British Bird Society. Archived from the original on 5 May 2017. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
  67. "Godzilla vs. Godzilla—How the Chinese Giant Salamander is taking a toll on its Japanese Comic Counterpart". Amphibians.org. Archived from the original on 30 June 2017. Retrieved 12 March 2017.
  68. Voloder, Dubravka (3 January 1012). "Print Email Facebook Twitter More World-first hybrid sharks found off Australia". ABC News. Archived from the original on 5 January 2012. Retrieved 5 January 2012.
  69. Roth, Annie (15 July 2020). "Scientists Accidentally Bred the Fish Version of a Liger". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on 16 July 2020. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
  70. Káldy, Jenő; Mozsár, Attila; Fazekas, Gyöngyvér; Farkas, Móni; Fazekas, Dorottya Lilla; Fazekas, Georgina Lea; Goda, Katalin; Gyöngy, Zsuzsanna; Kovács, Balázs; Semmens, Kenneth; Bercsényi, Miklós (6 July 2020). "Hybridization of Russian Sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii, Brandt and Ratzeberg, 1833) and American Paddlefish (Polyodon spathula, Walbaum 1792) and Evaluation of Their Progeny". Genes. 11 (7): 753. doi: 10.3390/genes11070753 . ISSN   2073-4425. PMC   7397225 . PMID   32640744.
  71. Carvalho, João E.; Lahaye, François; Schubert, Michael (2017). "Keeping amphioxus in the laboratory: an update on available husbandry methods". The International Journal of Developmental Biology. 61 (10-11-12): 773–783. doi:10.1387/ijdb.170192ms.
  72. Yue, Jia-Xing; Kozmikova, Iryna; Ono, Hiroki; Nossa, Carlos W.; Kozmik, Zbynek; Putnam, Nicholas H.; Yu, Jr-Kai; Holland, Linda Z. (12 July 2016). "Conserved Noncoding Elements in the Most Distant Genera of Cephalochordates: The Goldilocks Principle". Genome Biology and Evolution. 8 (8): 2387–2405. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evw158 .
  73. Hall, H. Glenn; Zettel-Nalen, Catherine; Ellis, James D. "African Honey Bee: What You Need to Know". University of Florida IFAS Extension. Archived from the original on 23 June 2008. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
  74. Grula, John W.; Taylor, Orley R. (1980). "The Effect of X-Chromosome Inheritance on Mate-Selection Behavior in the Sulfur Butterflies, Colias eurytheme and C. Philodice". Evolution. 34 (4): 688–95. doi:10.2307/2408022. JSTOR   2408022. PMID   28563983.
  75. Mallet, J.; Beltrán, M.; Neukirchen, W.; Linares, M. (2007). "Natural hybridization in heliconiine butterflies: The species boundary as a continuum". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 7 (1): 28. Bibcode:2007BMCEE...7...28M. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-28 . PMC   1821009 . PMID   17319954.
  76. Brower, A. V. Z. (2011). "Hybrid speciation in Heliconius butterflies? A review and critique of the evidence". Genetica. 139 (2): 589–609. doi:10.1007/s10709-010-9530-4. PMC   3089819 . PMID   21113790.
  77. Inter-genomic sexual conflict drives antagonistic coevolution in harvester ants
  78. Goulet, Benjamin E.; Roda, Federico; Hopkins, Robin (2016). "Hybridization in Plants: Old Ideas, New Techniques". Plant Physiology. 173 (1): 65–78. doi:10.1104/pp.16.01340. PMC   5210733 . PMID   27895205.
  79. McNeill, J.; Barrie, F. R.; Buck, W. R.; Demoulin, V.; Greuter, W.; Hawksworth, D. L.; Herendeen, P. S.; Knapp, S.; Marhold, K.; Prado, J.; Prud'homme Van Reine, W. F.; Smith, G. F.; Wiersema, J. H.; Turland, N. J. (2012). International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. Vol. Regnum Vegetabile 154. A.R.G. Gantner. ISBN   9783874294256. Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
  80. "'Columbia' and 'Liberty' Planetree" (PDF). U.S. National Arboretum. 1999. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 March 2017. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
  81. Gledhill, David (2008). The Names of Plants. Cambridge University Press. p. 23. ISBN   9780521685535. Archived from the original on 20 November 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2018.
  82. Warschefsky, E.; Penmetsa, R. V.; Cook, D. R.; von Wettberg, E. J. B. (8 October 2014). "Back to the wilds: Tapping evolutionary adaptations for resilient crops through systematic hybridization with crop wild relatives". American Journal of Botany. 101 (10): 1791–1800. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1400116 . PMID   25326621.
  83. Stace, C. A. (1987). "Triticale: A Case of Nomenclatural Mistreatment". Taxon. 36 (2): 445–452. doi:10.2307/1221447. JSTOR   1221447.
  84. Darrow, G.M. (1955). "Blackberry—raspberry hybrids". Journal of Heredity. 46 (2): 67–71. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a106521.
  85. Carrington, Sean; Fraser, Henry C. (2003). "Grapefruit". A~Z of Barbados Heritage. Macmillan Caribbean. pp. 90–91. ISBN   9780333920688.
  86. "Mint Genomics Resource: Species". Lange Laboratory, Washington State University. Archived from the original on 21 March 2017. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
  87. Hull, R. (2009). "A Short Guide to the London Plane" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2016.
  88. Venables, B. (4 March 2015). "The Secret History of the London Plane Tree". Londonist. Archived from the original on 2 February 2016. Retrieved 2 February 2016.
  89. "Legacy Bulbs Six". Pacific Bulb Society. Archived from the original on 26 December 2016. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
  90. "Lilium Hybrids". Pacific Bulb Society. Archived from the original on 11 March 2015. Retrieved 22 March 2015.
  91. "University of Colorado Principles of Genetics (MCDB 2150) Lecture 33: Chromosomal changes: Monosomy, Trisomy, Polyploidy, Structural Changes". University of Colorado. 21 November 2000. Archived from the original on 14 October 2012.
  92. Burr, Benjamin; Burr, Frances (2 October 2000). "How do seedless fruits arise and how are they propagated?". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 20 March 2017. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
  93. Vernot, B.; Akey, J. M. (2014). "Resurrecting Surviving Neandertal Lineages from Modern Human Genomes". Science. 343 (6174): 1017–1021. Bibcode:2014Sci...343.1017V. doi: 10.1126/science.1245938 . PMID   24476670. S2CID   23003860.
  94. Green, R.E.; Krause, J.; Briggs, A.W.; Maricic, T.; Stenzel, U.; Kircher, M.; et al. (2010). "A Draft Sequence of the Neandertal Genome". Science. 328 (5979): 710–722. Bibcode:2010Sci...328..710G. doi:10.1126/science.1188021. PMC   5100745 . PMID   20448178.
  95. Huerta-Sánchez, Emilia; Jin, Xin; Asan; Bianba, Zhuoma; Peter, Benjamin M.; Vinckenbosch, Nicolas; Liang, Yu; Yi, Xin; He, Mingze; Somel, Mehmet; Ni, Peixiang; Wang, Bo; Ou, Xiaohua; Huasang; Luosang, Jiangbai; Cuo, Zha XiPing; Li, Kui; Gao, Guoyi; Yin, Ye; Wang, Wei; Zhang, Xiuqing; Xu, Xun; Yang, Huanming; Li, Yingrui; Wang, Jian; Wang, Jun; Nielsen, Rasmus (2014). "Altitude adaptation in Tibetans caused by introgression of Denisovan-like DNA". Nature. 512 (7513): 194–197. Bibcode:2014Natur.512..194H. doi:10.1038/nature13408. PMC   4134395 . PMID   25043035.
  96. Duarte, Cidalia; et al. (22 June 1999). "The early Upper Paleolithic human skeleton from the Abrigo do Lagar Velho (Portugal) and modern human emergence in Iberia". PNAS. 96 (13): 7604–7609. Bibcode:1999PNAS...96.7604D. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7604 . PMC   22133 . PMID   10377462.
  97. Bower, Bruce (5 October 2016). "Animal hybrids may hold clues to Neandertal-human interbreeding". Sciencenews. Archived from the original on 12 September 2017. Retrieved 23 May 2017.
  98. Fu, Qiaomei; et al. (13 August 2015). "An early modern human from Romania with a recent Neanderthal ancestor". Nature. 524 (7564): 216–219. Bibcode:2015Natur.524..216F. doi:10.1038/nature14558. PMC   4537386 . PMID   26098372.
  99. Wang, C. C.; Farina, S. E.; Li, H. (2013) [online 2012]. "Neanderthal DNA and modern human origins". Quaternary International. 295: 126–129. Bibcode:2013QuInt.295..126W. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2012.02.027.
  100. "Minotauros". Theoi. Archived from the original on 22 March 2021. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
  101. "Bestiary". Theoi. Archived from the original on 22 March 2017. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
  102. Kugel, James L. (2009). Traditions of the Bible: A Guide to the Bible As It Was at the Start of the Common Era. Harvard University Press. p. 198. ISBN   9780674039766.
  103. Kugel, James L. (1997). The Bible as It Was. Harvard University Press. p. 110. ISBN   9780674069411.
  104. Boyd, Gregory A. God at War: The Bible & Spiritual Conflict. IVP Academic. p. 177.