This article needs additional citations for verification .(September 2009) |

Part of a series on |

Regression analysis |
---|

Models |

Estimation |

Background |

In statistics, a **fixed effects model** is a statistical model in which the model parameters are fixed or non-random quantities. This is in contrast to random effects models and mixed models in which all or some of the model parameters are random variables. In many applications including econometrics ^{ [1] } and biostatistics ^{ [2] }^{ [3] }^{ [4] }^{ [5] } a fixed effects model refers to a regression model in which the group means are fixed (non-random) as opposed to a random effects model in which the group means are a random sample from a population.^{ [6] } Generally, data can be grouped according to several observed factors. The group means could be modeled as fixed or random effects for each grouping. In a fixed effects model each group mean is a group-specific fixed quantity.

- Qualitative description
- Formal model and assumptions
- Statistical estimation
- Fixed effects estimator
- First difference estimator
- Chamberlain method
- Hausman–Taylor method
- Generalization with input uncertainty
- Testing fixed effects (FE) vs. random effects (RE)
- See also
- Notes
- References
- External links

In panel data where longitudinal observations exist for the same subject, fixed effects represent the subject-specific means. In panel data analysis the term **fixed effects estimator** (also known as the **within estimator**) is used to refer to an estimator for the coefficients in the regression model including those fixed effects (one time-invariant intercept for each subject).

Such models assist in controlling for omitted variable bias due to unobserved heterogeneity when this heterogeneity is constant over time. This heterogeneity can be removed from the data through differencing, for example by subtracting the group-level average over time, or by taking a first difference which will remove any time invariant components of the model.

There are two common assumptions made about the individual specific effect: the random effects assumption and the fixed effects assumption. The random effects assumption is that the individual-specific effects are uncorrelated with the independent variables. The fixed effect assumption is that the individual-specific effects are correlated with the independent variables. If the random effects assumption holds, the random effects estimator is more efficient than the fixed effects estimator. However, if this assumption does not hold, the random effects estimator is not consistent. The Durbin–Wu–Hausman test is often used to discriminate between the fixed and the random effects models.^{ [7] }^{ [8] }

Consider the linear unobserved effects model for observations and time periods:

- for and

Where:

- is the dependent variable observed for individual at time .
- is the time-variant (the number of independent variables) regressor vector.
- is the matrix of parameters.
- is the unobserved time-invariant individual effect. For example, the innate ability for individuals or historical and institutional factors for countries.
- is the error term.

Unlike , cannot be directly observed.

Unlike the random effects model where the unobserved is independent of for all , the fixed effects (FE) model allows to be correlated with the regressor matrix . Strict exogeneity with respect to the idiosyncratic error term is still required.

Since is not observable, it cannot be directly controlled for. The FE model eliminates by demeaning the variables using the *within* transformation:

where , , and .

Since is constant, and hence the effect is eliminated. The FE estimator is then obtained by an OLS regression of on .

At least three alternatives to the *within* transformation exist with variations.

One is to add a dummy variable for each individual (omitting the first individual because of multicollinearity). This is numerically, but not computationally, equivalent to the fixed effect model and only works if the sum of the number of series and the number of global parameters is smaller than the number of observations.^{ [9] } The dummy variable approach is particularly demanding with respect to computer memory usage and it is not recommended for problems larger than the available RAM, and the applied program compilation, can accommodate.

Second alternative is to use consecutive reiterations approach to local and global estimations.^{ [10] } This approach is very suitable for low memory systems on which it is much more computationally efficient than the dummy variable approach.

The third approach is a nested estimation whereby the local estimation for individual series is programmed in as a part of the model definition.^{ [11] } This approach is the most computationally and memory efficient, but it requires proficient programming skills and access to the model programming code; although, it can be programmed even in SAS.^{ [12] }^{ [13] }

Finally, each of the above alternatives can be improved if the series-specific estimation is linear (within a nonlinear model), in which case the direct linear solution for individual series can be programmed in as part of the nonlinear model definition.^{ [14] }

An alternative to the within transformation is the *first difference* transformation, which produces a different estimator. For :

The FD estimator is then obtained by an OLS regression of on .

When , the first difference and fixed effects estimators are numerically equivalent. For , they are not. If the error terms are homoskedastic with no serial correlation, the fixed effects estimator is more efficient than the first difference estimator. If follows a random walk, however, the first difference estimator is more efficient.^{ [15] }

For the special two period case (), the fixed effects (FE) estimator and the first difference (FD) estimator are numerically equivalent. This is because the FE estimator effectively "doubles the data set" used in the FD estimator. To see this, establish that the fixed effects estimator is:

Since each can be re-written as , we'll re-write the line as:

Gary Chamberlain's method, a generalization of the within estimator, replaces with its linear projection onto the explanatory variables. Writing the linear projection as:

this results in the following equation:

which can be estimated by minimum distance estimation.^{ [16] }

Need to have more than one time-variant regressor () and time-invariant regressor () and at least one and one that are uncorrelated with .

Partition the and variables such that where and are uncorrelated with . Need .

Estimating via OLS on using and as instruments yields a consistent estimate.

When there is input uncertainty for the data, , then the value, rather than the sum of squared residuals, should be minimized.^{ [17] } This can be directly achieved from substitution rules:

- ,

then the values and standard deviations for and can be determined via classical ordinary least squares analysis and variance-covariance matrix.

We can test whether a fixed or random effects model is appropriate using a Durbin–Wu–Hausman test.

- :

- :

If is true, both and are consistent, but only is efficient. If is true, is consistent and is not.

- where

The Hausman test is a specification test so a large test statistic might be indication that there might be errors-in-variables (EIV) or our model is misspecified. If the FE assumption is true, we should find that .

A simple heuristic is that if there could be EIV.

- ↑ Greene, W.H., 2011.
*Econometric Analysis*, 7th ed., Prentice Hall - ↑ Diggle, Peter J.; Heagerty, Patrick; Liang, Kung-Yee; Zeger, Scott L. (2002).
*Analysis of Longitudinal Data*(2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 169–171. ISBN 0-19-852484-6. - ↑ Fitzmaurice, Garrett M.; Laird, Nan M.; Ware, James H. (2004).
*Applied Longitudinal Analysis*. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 326–328. ISBN 0-471-21487-6. - ↑ Laird, Nan M.; Ware, James H. (1982). "Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data".
*Biometrics*.**38**(4): 963–974. JSTOR 2529876. - ↑ Gardiner, Joseph C.; Luo, Zhehui; Roman, Lee Anne (2009). "Fixed effects, random effects and GEE: What are the differences?".
*Statistics in Medicine*.**28**: 221–239. doi:10.1002/sim.3478. - ↑ Ramsey, F., Schafer, D., 2002.
*The Statistical Sleuth: A Course in Methods of Data Analysis*, 2nd ed. Duxbury Press - ↑ Cameron, A. Colin; Trivedi, Pravin K. (2005).
*Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications*. Cambridge University Press. pp. 717–19. - ↑ Nerlove, Marc (2005).
*Essays in Panel Data Econometrics*. Cambridge University Press. pp. 36–39. - ↑ Garcia, Oscar. (1983). "A stochastic differential equation model for the height growth of forest stands".
*Biometrics*: 1059–1072. - ↑ Tait, David; Cieszewski, Chris J.; Bella, Imre E. (1986). "The stand dynamics of lodgepole pine".
*Can. J. For. Res*.**18**: 1255–1260. - ↑ Strub, Mike; Cieszewski, Chris J. (2006). "Base–age invariance properties of two techniques for estimating the parameters of site index models".
*Forest Science*.**52**(2): 182–186. - ↑ Strub, Mike; Cieszewski, Chris J. (2003). "Fitting global site index parameters when plot or tree site index is treated as a local nuisance parameter In: Burkhart HA, editor. Proceedings of the Symposium on Statistics and Information Technology in Forestry; 2002 September 8–12; Blacksburg, Virginia: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University": 97–107.Cite journal requires
`|journal=`

(help) - ↑ Cieszewski, Chris J.; Harrison, Mike; Martin, Stacey W. (2000). "Practical methods for estimating non-biased parameters in self-referencing growth and yield models" (PDF).
*PMRC Technical Report*.**2000**(7): 12. - ↑ Schnute, Jon; McKinnell, Skip (1984). "A biologically meaningful approach to response surface analysis".
*Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci*.**41**: 936–953. - ↑ Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2001).
*Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data*. MIT Press. pp. 279–291. ISBN 978-0-262-23219-7. - ↑ Chamberlain, Gary (1984). "Chapter 22 Panel data".
**2**: 1247–1318. doi:10.1016/S1573-4412(84)02014-6. ISSN 1573-4412.Cite journal requires`|journal=`

(help) - ↑ Ren, Bin; Dong, Ruobing; Esposito, Thomas M.; Pueyo, Laurent; Debes, John H.; Poteet, Charles A.; Choquet, Élodie; Benisty, Myriam; Chiang, Eugene; Grady, Carol A.; Hines, Dean C.; Schneider, Glenn; Soummer, Rémi (2018). "A Decade of MWC 758 Disk Images: Where Are the Spiral-Arm-Driving Planets?".
*The Astrophysical Journal Letters*.**857**: L9. arXiv: 1803.06776 . Bibcode:2018ApJ...857L...9R. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aab7f5.

In probability theory and statistics, the **binomial distribution** with parameters *n* and *p* is the discrete probability distribution of the number of successes in a sequence of *n* independent experiments, each asking a yes–no question, and each with its own Boolean-valued outcome: *success* or *failure*. A single success/failure experiment is also called a Bernoulli trial or Bernoulli experiment, and a sequence of outcomes is called a Bernoulli process; for a single trial, i.e., *n* = 1, the binomial distribution is a Bernoulli distribution. The binomial distribution is the basis for the popular binomial test of statistical significance.

In probability theory and statistics, the **exponential distribution** is the probability distribution of the time between events in a Poisson point process, i.e., a process in which events occur continuously and independently at a constant average rate. It is a particular case of the gamma distribution. It is the continuous analogue of the geometric distribution, and it has the key property of being memoryless. In addition to being used for the analysis of Poisson point processes it is found in various other contexts.

The method of **least squares** is a standard approach in regression analysis to approximate the solution of overdetermined systems by minimizing the sum of the squares of the residuals made in the results of every single equation.

In statistics, the **Gauss–Markov theorem** states that the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator has the lowest sampling variance within the class of linear unbiased estimators, if the errors in the linear regression model are uncorrelated, have equal variances and expectation value of zero. The errors do not need to be normal, nor do they need to be independent and identically distributed. The requirement that the estimator be unbiased cannot be dropped, since biased estimators exist with lower variance. See, for example, the James–Stein estimator, ridge regression, or simply any degenerate estimator.

In probability theory and statistics, the **gamma distribution** is a two-parameter family of continuous probability distributions. The exponential distribution, Erlang distribution, and chi-square distribution are special cases of the gamma distribution. There are two different parameterizations in common use:

- With a shape parameter
*k*and a scale parameter*θ*. - With a shape parameter
*α*=*k*and an inverse scale parameter*β*= 1/*θ*, called a rate parameter.

**Flight dynamics** is the science of air vehicle orientation and control in three dimensions. The three critical flight dynamics parameters are the angles of rotation in three dimensions about the vehicle's center of gravity (cg), known as *pitch*, *roll* and *yaw*.

In statistical inference, specifically predictive inference, a **prediction interval** is an estimate of an interval in which a future observation will fall, with a certain probability, given what has already been observed. Prediction intervals are often used in regression analysis.

In statistics, econometrics, epidemiology and related disciplines, the method of **instrumental variables** (**IV**) is used to estimate causal relationships when controlled experiments are not feasible or when a treatment is not successfully delivered to every unit in a randomized experiment. Intuitively, IVs are used when an explanatory variable of interest is correlated with the error term, in which case ordinary least squares and ANOVA give biased results. A valid instrument induces changes in the explanatory variable but has no independent effect on the dependent variable, allowing a researcher to uncover the causal effect of the explanatory variable on the dependent variable.

In statistics, **omitted-variable bias** (**OVB**) occurs when a statistical model leaves out one or more relevant variables. The bias results in the model attributing the effect of the missing variables to those that were included.

In statistics and econometrics, **panel data** and **longitudinal data** are both multi-dimensional data involving measurements over time. Panel data is a subset of longitudinal data where observations are for the same subjects each time.

In statistics, **simple linear regression** is a linear regression model with a single explanatory variable. That is, it concerns two-dimensional sample points with one independent variable and one dependent variable and finds a linear function that, as accurately as possible, predicts the dependent variable values as a function of the independent variable. The adjective *simple* refers to the fact that the outcome variable is related to a single predictor.

**Difference in differences** is a statistical technique used in econometrics and quantitative research in the social sciences that attempts to mimic an experimental research design using observational study data, by studying the differential effect of a treatment on a 'treatment group' versus a 'control group' in a natural experiment. It calculates the effect of a treatment on an outcome by comparing the average change over time in the outcome variable for the treatment group to the average change over time for the control group. Although it is intended to mitigate the effects of extraneous factors and selection bias, depending on how the treatment group is chosen, this method may still be subject to certain biases.

In statistics, **principal component regression** (**PCR**) is a regression analysis technique that is based on principal component analysis (PCA). More specifically, PCR is used for estimating the unknown regression coefficients in a standard linear regression model.

In statistics, a **sum of squares due to lack of fit**, or more tersely a **lack-of-fit sum of squares**, is one of the components of a partition of the sum of squares of residuals in an analysis of variance, used in the numerator in an F-test of the null hypothesis that says that a proposed model fits well. The other component is the **pure-error sum of squares**.

In statistical theory, the field of **high-dimensional statistics** studies data whose dimension is larger than typically considered in classical multivariate analysis. The area arose owing to the emergence of many modern data sets in which the dimension of the data vectors may be comparable to, or even larger than, the sample size, so that justification for the use of traditional techniques, often based on asymptotic arguments with the dimension held fixed as the sample size increased, was lacking.

The purpose of this page is to provide supplementary materials for the ordinary least squares article, reducing the load of the main article with mathematics and improving its accessibility, while at the same time retaining the completeness of exposition.

In statistics, **errors-in-variables models** or **measurement error models** are regression models that account for measurement errors in the independent variables. In contrast, standard regression models assume that those regressors have been measured exactly, or observed without error; as such, those models account only for errors in the dependent variables, or responses.

In statistics and econometrics, the **first-difference (FD) estimator** is an estimator used to address the problem of omitted variables with panel data. It is consistent under the assumptions of the fixed effects model. In certain situations it can be more efficient than the standard fixed effects estimator.

In econometrics, the **Arellano–Bond estimator** is a generalized method of moments estimator used to estimate dynamic models of panel data. It was proposed in 1991 by Manuel Arellano and Stephen Bond, based on the earlier work by Alok Bhargava and John Denis Sargan in 1983, for addressing certain endogeneity problems. The GMM-SYS estimator is a system that contains both the levels and the first difference equations. It provides an alternative to the standard first difference GMM estimator.

A **partially linear model** is a form of semiparametric model, since it contains parametric and nonparametric elements. Application of the least squares estimators is available to partially linear model, if the hypothesis of the known of nonparametric element is valid. Partially linear equations were first used in the analysis of the relationship between temperature and usage of electricity by Engle, Granger, Rice and Weiss (1986). Typical application of partially linear model in the field of Microeconomics is presented by Tripathi in the case of profitability of firm's production in 1997. Also, partially linear model applied successfully in some other academic field. In 1994, Zeger and Diggle introduced partially linear model into biometrics. In environmental science, Parda-Sanchez et al used partially linear model to analysis collected data in 2000. So far, partially linear model was optimized in many other statistic methods. In 1988, Robinson applied Nadaraya-Waston kernel estimator to test the nonparametric element to build a least-squares estimator After that, in 1997, local linear method was found by Truong.

- Christensen, Ronald (2002).
*Plane Answers to Complex Questions: The Theory of Linear Models*(Third ed.). New York: Springer. ISBN 0-387-95361-2. - Gujarati, Damodar N.; Porter, Dawn C. (2009). "Panel Data Regression Models".
*Basic Econometrics*(Fifth international ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill. pp. 591–616. ISBN 978-007-127625-2. - Hsiao, Cheng (2003). "Fixed-effects models".
*Analysis of Panel Data*(2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 95–103. ISBN 0-521-52271-4. - Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2013). "Fixed Effects Estimation".
*Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach*(Fifth international ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western. pp. 466–474. ISBN 978-1-111-53439-4.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article

Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.

Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.

Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.