Grumman X-29

Last updated

X-29
Grumman-X29-InFlight.jpg
A Grumman X-29 in flight
General information
Type Experimental aircraft
National originUnited States
Manufacturer Grumman
StatusRetired
Primary users United States Air Force
Number built2
History
First flight14 December 1984

The Grumman X-29 is an American experimental aircraft that tested a forward-swept wing, canard control surfaces, and other novel aircraft technologies. Funded by NASA, the United States Air Force and DARPA, the X-29 was developed by Grumman, and the two built were flown by NASA and the United States Air Force. [1] The aerodynamic instability of the X-29's airframe required the use of computerized fly-by-wire control. Composite materials were used to control the aeroelastic divergent twisting experienced by forward-swept wings, and to reduce weight. The aircraft first flew in 1984, and two X-29s were flight tested through 1991.

Contents

Design and development

Two X-29As were built by Grumman after the proposal had been chosen over a competing one involving a General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon. The X-29 design made use of the forward fuselage and nose landing gear from two existing F-5A Freedom Fighter airframes (63-8372 became 82-0003 and 65-10573 became 82-0049). [2] The control surface actuators and main landing gear were from the F-16. The technological advancement that made the X-29 a plausible design was the use of carbon-fiber composites. The wings of the X-29, made partially of graphite epoxy, were swept forward at more than 33 degrees; forward-swept wings were first trialed 40 years earlier on the experimental Junkers Ju 287 and OKB-1 EF 131. The Grumman internal designation for the X-29 was "Grumman Model 712" or "G-712". [3]

X-29 cockpit Grumman X-29 Cockpit.jpg
X-29 cockpit

Three-surface design and inherent instability

The X-29 is described as a three surface aircraft, with canards, forward-swept wings, and aft strake control surfaces, [4] using three-surface longitudinal control. [5] The canards and wings result in reduced trim drag and reduced wave drag, while using the strakes for trim in situations where the center of gravity is off provides less trim drag than relying on the canard to compensate. [4]

The configuration, combined with a center of gravity well aft of the aerodynamic center, made the craft inherently unstable. Stability was provided by the computerized flight control system making 40 corrections per second. The flight control system was made up of three redundant digital computers backed up by three redundant analog computers; any of the three could fly it on its own, but the redundancy allowed them to check for errors. Each of the three would "vote" on their measurements, so that if any one was malfunctioning it could be detected. It was estimated that a total failure of the system was as unlikely as a mechanical failure in an airplane with a conventional arrangement. [5]

The high pitch instability of the airframe led to wide predictions of extreme maneuverability. This perception has held up in the years following the end of flight tests. Air Force tests did not support this expectation. [6] For the flight control system to keep the whole system stable, the ability to initiate a maneuver easily needed to be moderated. This was programmed into the flight control system to preserve the ability to stop the pitching rotation and keep the aircraft from departing out of control. As a result, the whole system as flown (with the flight control system in the loop as well) could not be characterized as having any special increased agility. It was concluded that the X-29 could have had increased agility if it had faster control surface actuators and/or larger control surfaces. [6]

Aeroelastic considerations

X-29 with aft control surfaces deflected X-29 at High Angle of Attack with Smoke Generators.jpg
X-29 with aft control surfaces deflected

In a forward swept wing configuration, the aerodynamic lift produces a twisting force which rotates the wing leading edge upward. This results in a higher angle of attack, which increases lift, twisting the wing further. This aeroelastic divergence can quickly lead to structural failure. With conventional metallic construction, a torsionally very stiff wing would be required to resist twisting; stiffening the wing adds weight, which may make the design unfeasible. [7]

The X-29 design made use of the anisotropic elastic coupling between bending and twisting of the carbon fiber composite material to address this aeroelastic effect. Rather than using a very stiff wing, which would carry a weight penalty even with the relatively light-weight composite, the X-29 used a laminate which produced coupling between bending and torsion. As lift increases, bending loads force the wing tips to bend upward. Torsion loads attempt to twist the wing to higher angles of attack, but the coupling resists the loads, twisting the leading edge downward reducing wing angle of attack and lift. With lift reduced, the loads are reduced and divergence is avoided. [7]

Operational history

The first X-29 took its maiden flight on 14 December 1984 from Edwards AFB piloted by Grumman's Chief Test Pilot Chuck Sewell. [2] The X-29 was the third forward-swept wing jet-powered aircraft design to fly; the other two were the German Junkers Ju 287 (1944) and the HFB-320 Hansa Jet (1964). [8] On 13 December 1985, an X-29 became the first forward-swept wing aircraft to fly at supersonic speed in level flight.

Grumman X-29A at the National Museum of the United States Air Force Grumman X-29A USAF.jpg
Grumman X-29A at the National Museum of the United States Air Force
Grumman X-29 at Edwards Air Force Base Grumman X-29.jpg
Grumman X-29 at Edwards Air Force Base

The X-29 began a NASA test program four months after its first flight. The X-29 proved reliable, and by August 1986 was flying research missions of over three hours involving multiple flights. The first X-29 was not equipped with a spin recovery parachute, as flight tests were planned to avoid maneuvers that could result in departure from controlled flight, such as a spin. The second X-29 was given such a parachute and was involved in high angle-of-attack testing. X-29 number two was maneuverable up to an angle of attack of about 25 degrees with a maximum angle of 67° reached in a momentary pitch-up maneuver. [9] [10]

The two X-29 aircraft flew a total of 242 times from 1984 to 1991. [3] [11] The NASA Dryden Flight Research Center reported that the X-29 demonstrated a number of new technologies and techniques, and new uses of existing technologies, including the use of "aeroelastic tailoring to control structural divergence", aircraft control and handling during extreme instability, three-surface longitudinal control, a "double-hinged trailing-edge flaperon at supersonic speeds", effective high angle of attack control, vortex control, and demonstration of military utility. [5]

Aircraft on display

The first X-29, 82-003, is now on display in the Research and Development Gallery at the National Museum of the United States Air Force on Wright-Patterson Air Force Base near Dayton, Ohio. [12] The other craft is on display at the Armstrong Flight Research Center on Edwards Air Force Base. A full-scale model was on display from 1989 to 2011 at the National Air and Space Museum's National Mall building in Washington, DC. [13] The full-scale replica was moved to the Cradle of Aviation Museum in Garden City, New York in 2011.

Specifications (X-29)

Grumman X-29 outline.svg

Data from Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1988-89 [14] NASA X-Planes, [15] Donald, [3] Winchester [11]

General characteristics

48 ft 1 in (15 m) fuselage only

Performance

Avionics

Notable appearances in media

The 1989 flight simulator game F29 Retaliator was based around the X-29 and imagined a future where it had been developed into a production fighter jet and fitted with various advanced weaponry.[ citation needed ]

See also

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aeroelasticity</span> Interactions among inertial, elastic, and aerodynamic forces

Aeroelasticity is the branch of physics and engineering studying the interactions between the inertial, elastic, and aerodynamic forces occurring while an elastic body is exposed to a fluid flow. The study of aeroelasticity may be broadly classified into two fields: static aeroelasticity dealing with the static or steady state response of an elastic body to a fluid flow, and dynamic aeroelasticity dealing with the body's dynamic response.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Delta wing</span> Triangle shaped aircraft wing configuration

A delta wing is a wing shaped in the form of a triangle. It is named for its similarity in shape to the Greek uppercase letter delta (Δ).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Swept wing</span> Plane wing that angles backwards or forwards

A swept wing is a wing angled either backward or occasionally forward from its root rather than perpendicular to the fuselage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rockwell-MBB X-31</span>

The Rockwell-Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm X-31 is an experimental jet aircraft designed to test fighter thrust vectoring technology. It was designed and built by Rockwell and Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm (MBB), as part of a joint US and German Enhanced Fighter Maneuverability program to provide additional control authority in pitch and yaw, for significantly more maneuverability than most conventional fighters. An advanced flight control system provided controlled flight at high angles of attack where conventional aircraft would stall or lose control. Two aircraft were built, of which only one has survived.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sukhoi Su-47</span> Experimental fighter aircraft

The Sukhoi Su-47 Berkut, also designated S-32 and S-37 during initial development, was a Russian experimental supersonic jet fighter developed by the JSC Sukhoi Company. A distinguishing feature of the aircraft was its forward-swept wing which gave the aircraft excellent agility and maneuverability. While serial production of the type never materialized and the configuration was not further pursued, the sole aircraft produced served as a technology demonstrator prototype for a number of advanced technologies later used in fourth-generation fighter Su-35 and fifth-generation fighter Su-57.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elevator (aeronautics)</span> Aircraft control surface used to control pitch

Elevators are flight control surfaces, usually at the rear of an aircraft, which control the aircraft's pitch, and therefore the angle of attack and the lift of the wing. The elevators are usually hinged to the tailplane or horizontal stabilizer. They may be the only pitch control surface present, and are sometimes located at the front of the aircraft or integrated into a rear "all-moving tailplane", also called a slab elevator or stabilator.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forward-swept wing</span> Aircraft wing configuration

A forward-swept wing or reverse-swept wing is an aircraft wing configuration in which the quarter-chord line of the wing has a forward sweep. Typically, the leading edge also sweeps forward.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stabilizer (aeronautics)</span> Aircraft component

An aircraft stabilizer is an aerodynamic surface, typically including one or more movable control surfaces, that provides longitudinal (pitch) and/or directional (yaw) stability and control. A stabilizer can feature a fixed or adjustable structure on which any movable control surfaces are hinged, or it can itself be a fully movable surface such as a stabilator. Depending on the context, "stabilizer" may sometimes describe only the front part of the overall surface.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pitch-up</span>

In aerodynamics, pitch-up is an uncommanded nose-upwards rotation of an aircraft. It is an undesirable characteristic that has been observed mostly in experimental swept-wing aircraft at high subsonic Mach numbers or high angle of attack.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NASA AD-1</span> NASA experimental oblique wing aircraft

The NASA AD-1 is both an aircraft and an associated flight test program conducted between 1979 and 1982 at the NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards California, which successfully demonstrated an aircraft wing that could be pivoted obliquely from zero to 60 degrees during flight.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boeing X-53 Active Aeroelastic Wing</span> Experimental aircraft

The X-53 Active Aeroelastic Wing (AAW) development program is a completed American research project that was undertaken jointly by the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), Boeing Phantom Works and NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center, where the technology was flight tested on a modified McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet. Active Aeroelastic Wing Technology is a technology that integrates wing aerodynamics, controls, and structure to harness and control wing aeroelastic twist at high speeds and dynamic pressures. By using multiple leading and trailing edge controls like "aerodynamic tabs", subtle amounts of aeroelastic twist can be controlled to provide large amounts of wing control power, while minimizing maneuver air loads at high wing strain conditions or aerodynamic drag at low wing strain conditions. This program was the first full-scale proof of AAW technology.

An adaptive compliant wing is a wing which is flexible enough for aspects of its shape to be changed in flight. Flexible wings have a number of benefits. Conventional flight control mechanisms operate using hinges, resulting in disruptions to the airflow, vortices, and in some cases, separation of the airflow. These effects contribute to the drag of the aircraft, resulting in less efficiency and higher fuel costs. Flexible aerofoils can manipulate aerodynamic forces with less disruptions to the flow, resulting in less aerodynamic drag and improved fuel economy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canard (aeronautics)</span> Aircraft configuration in which a small wing is placed in front of the main wing

In aeronautics, a canard is a wing configuration in which a small forewing or foreplane is placed forward of the main wing of a fixed-wing aircraft or a weapon. The term "canard" may be used to describe the aircraft itself, the wing configuration, or the foreplane. Canard wings are also extensively used in guided missiles and smart bombs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tailless aircraft</span> Aircraft whose only horizontal aerodynamic surface is its main wing

In aeronautics, a tailless aircraft is an aircraft with no other horizontal aerodynamic surface besides its main wing. It may still have a fuselage, vertical tail fin, and/or vertical rudder.

Supermaneuverability is the capability of fighter aircraft to execute tactical maneuvers that are not possible with purely aerodynamic techniques. Such maneuvers can involve controlled side-slipping or angles of attack beyond maximum lift.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wing configuration</span> Describes the general shape and layout of an aircraft wing

The wing configuration of a fixed-wing aircraft is its arrangement of lifting and related surfaces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Strake (aeronautics)</span> Flight control surface

In aviation, a strake is an aerodynamic surface generally mounted on the fuselage of an aircraft to improve the flight characteristics either by controlling the airflow or by a simple stabilising effect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Three-surface aircraft</span> Fixed-wing aircraft with a main central wing plus fore and aft surfaces

A three-surface aircraft or sometimes three-lifting-surface aircraft has a foreplane, a central wing and a tailplane. The central wing surface always provides lift and is usually the largest, while the functions of the fore and aft planes may vary between types and may include lift, control and/or stability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Dynamics–Boeing AFTI/F-111A Aardvark</span> American research aircraft

The General Dynamics–Boeing AFTI/F-111A Aardvark was a research aircraft modified from a General Dynamics F-111 Aardvark to test a Boeing-built supercritical mission adaptive wing (MAW). This MAW, in contrast to standard control surfaces, could smoothly change the shape of its airfoil in flight.

References

Notes

  1. Prisco, Jacopo (12 July 2019). "X-29: NASA's ambitious 1980s fighter jet with inverted wings". CNN. Retrieved 30 May 2024.
  2. 1 2 Gehrs-Pahl, Andreas, ed. (1995). "The X-Planes: From X-1 to X-34". AIS.org. Archived from the original on 6 May 2001. Retrieved 1 September 2009.
  3. 1 2 3 Donald 1997, p. 483.
  4. 1 2 Roskam 1985, pp. 85–87.
  5. 1 2 3 "Fact Sheet: X-29 Advanced Technology Demonstrator Aircraft". NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center. 28 February 2014. Retrieved 24 August 2014.
  6. 1 2 Butts & Hoover 1989.
  7. 1 2 Pamadi 2004.
  8. Green 1970, pp. 493–496.
  9. Webster & Purifoy 1991.
  10. Winchester 2005, p. 261.
  11. 1 2 Winchester 2005, p. 262.
  12. "Grumman X-29A". National Museum of the U.S. Air Force. 28 May 2015. Retrieved 29 August 2015.
  13. "Beyond the Limits". National Air and Space Museum. Archived from the original on 16 June 2012. Retrieved 14 October 2011.
  14. Taylor, John W.R., ed. (1988). Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1988-89 (79th ed.). London: Jane's Information Group. pp. 399–400. ISBN   0-7106-0867-5.
  15. Jenkins, Landis & Miller 2003, p. 37.
  16. Lednicer, David. "The Incomplete Guide to Airfoil Usage". m-selig.ae.illinois.edu. Retrieved 16 April 2019.

Bibliography

  • Butts, S.L.; Hoover, A. D. (May 1989). Flying Qualities Evaluation of the X-29A Research Aircraft (Report). U.S. Air Force Flight Test Center. AFFTC-TR-89-08.
  • Donald, David, ed. (1997). "Grumman X-29A". The Complete Encyclopedia of World Aircraft. New York: Barnes & Noble. ISBN   978-0-7607-0592-6.
  • Green, William (1970). Warplanes of the Third Reich. New York: Doubleday. ISBN   978-0-385-05782-0.
  • Jenkins, Dennis R.; Landis, Tony; Miller, Jay (June 2003). American X-Vehicles: An Inventory—X-1 to X-50 (PDF). Monographs in Aerospace History No. 31. NASA. OCLC   68623213. SP-2003-4531. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 April 2020.
  • Pamadi, Bandu N. (2004). Performance, Stability, Dynamics, and Control of Airplanes (2nd ed.). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. doi:10.2514/4.862274. ISBN   978-1-56347-583-2.
  • Putnam, Terrill W. (January 1984). X-29 Flight-Research Program (PDF). AIAA 2nd Flight Test Conference. Las Vegas, Nevada. 16–18 November 1983. NASA. TM-86025.
  • Roskam, Jan (1985). Airplane Design, Part II: Preliminary Configuration Design and Integration of the Propulsion System. Ottawa, Kansas: Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corporation. ISBN   978-1-88488-543-3.
  • Thruelsen, Richard (1976). The Grumman Story. New York: Praeger Publishers. ISBN   978-0-275-54260-3.
  • Treadwell, Terry (1990). Ironworks: Grumman's Fighting Aeroplanes. Shrewsbury, UK: Airlife Publishers. ISBN   978-1-85310-070-3.
  • Warwick, Graham (16 June 1984). "Forward-sweep Technology". Flight International: 1563–1568.
  • Webster, Frederick R.; Purifoy, Dana (July 1991). X-29 High Angle-of-Attack Flying Qualities. U.S. Air Force Flight Test Center. AFFTC-TR-91-15. Archived from the original on 26 August 2014. Retrieved 24 August 2014.
  • Winchester, Jim (2005). "Grumman X-29". X-Planes and Prototypes. London: Amber Books. ISBN   978-1-904687-40-5.

PD-icon.svg This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration .