Northrop YF-23

Last updated

YF-23
Ray Wagner Collection Image YF-23.jpg
YF-23 flying over Edwards Air Force Base.
Role Stealth fighter technology demonstrator
National originUnited States
Manufacturer Northrop/McDonnell Douglas
First flight27 August 1990
StatusCanceled
Primary user United States Air Force
Produced1989–1990
Number built2

The Northrop/McDonnell Douglas YF-23 is an American single-seat, twin-engine, supersonic stealth fighter aircraft technology demonstrator designed for the United States Air Force (USAF). The design was a finalist in the USAF's Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) competition, battling the Lockheed YF-22 for a production contract. Two YF-23 prototypes were built.

Contents

In the 1980s, the USAF began looking for a replacement for its fighter aircraft to more effectively counter the Soviet Union's advanced Sukhoi Su-27 and Mikoyan MiG-29. Several companies submitted design proposals; the USAF selected proposals from Northrop and Lockheed. Northrop teamed with McDonnell Douglas to develop the YF-23, while Lockheed, Boeing, and General Dynamics developed the YF-22.

The YF-23 was stealthier and faster, but less agile than its competitor. After a four-year development and evaluation process, the YF-22 was announced the winner in 1991 and the design was developed into the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor, which first flew in 1997 and entered service in 2005. The U.S. Navy considered using the production version of the ATF as the basis for a replacement to the F-14, but these plans were later canceled. The two YF-23 prototypes are currently museum exhibits.

Development

American reconnaissance satellites first spotted the advanced Soviet Su-27 and MiG-29 fighter prototypes in 1978, which caused concern in the U.S. Both Soviet models were expected to reduce the maneuverability advantage of contemporary US fighter aircraft. [1] In 1981, the USAF requested information from several aerospace companies on possible features for an Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) to replace the F-15 Eagle. After discussions with aerospace companies, the USAF made air-to-air combat the primary role for the ATF. [2] The ATF was to take advantage of emerging technologies, including composite materials, lightweight alloys, advanced flight-control systems, more powerful propulsion systems, and stealth technology. [3] In October 1985, the USAF issued a request for proposal (RFP) to several aircraft manufacturers. The RFP was modified in May 1986 to include the evaluation of prototype air vehicles from the two finalists. [N 1] At the same time, the U.S. Navy, under the Navy Advanced Tactical Fighter (NATF) program, announced that it would use a derivative of the ATF winner to replace its F-14 Tomcat. The NATF program called for the procurement of 546 aircraft along with the USAF's planned procurement of 750 aircraft. [4]

Top view of the YF-23, showing the trapezoidal wings and separation between the forward fuselage and engine nacelles YF-23 top view.jpg
Top view of the YF-23, showing the trapezoidal wings and separation between the forward fuselage and engine nacelles

In July 1986, proposals for Demonstration and Validation (Dem/Val) were submitted by Lockheed, Boeing, General Dynamics, McDonnell Douglas, Northrop, Grumman and Rockwell; the latter two dropped out of competition shortly thereafter. [5] Northrop's design proposal (DP) was internally designated DP110. [6] Following proposal submissions, Lockheed, Boeing, and General Dynamics formed a team to develop whichever of their proposed designs was selected, if any. Northrop and McDonnell Douglas formed a team with a similar agreement. [7] The Lockheed and Northrop proposals were selected as finalists on 31 October 1986 for Dem/Val. Both teams were given 50 months to build and flight-test their prototypes, and they were successful, producing the Lockheed YF-22 and the Northrop YF-23. Concurrently, Pratt & Whitney and General Electric were contracted to develop the engines for the ATF engine competition. [8]

The YF-23 was designed to meet USAF requirements for survivability, supercruise, stealth, and ease of maintenance. [9] Supercruise requirements called for prolonged supersonic flight without the use of afterburners. [10] Northrop drew on its experience with the B-2 Spirit and F/A-18 Hornet to reduce the model's susceptibility to radar and infrared detection. [11] The USAF initially required the aircraft to land and stop within 2,000 feet (610 m), which meant the use of thrust reversers on their engines. In 1987, the USAF changed the runway length requirement to 3,000 feet (910 m), so thrust reversers were no longer needed. This allowed the aircraft to have smaller engine nacelle housings. The nacelles were not downsized on the prototypes. [12] [13]

Formally designated as the YF-23A, the first aircraft (serial number 87-0800), Prototype Air Vehicle 1 (PAV-1), was rolled out on 22 June 1990; [14] PAV-1 took its 50-minute maiden flight on 27 August with Alfred "Paul" Metz at the controls. [15] The second YF-23 (serial number 87-0801, PAV-2) made its first flight on 26 October, piloted by Jim Sandberg. [16] The first YF-23 was painted charcoal gray and was nicknamed "Gray Ghost". The second prototype was painted in two shades of gray and nicknamed "Spider". [17] [18] PAV-1 briefly had a red hourglass painted on its ram air scoop to prevent injury to ground crew. The red hourglass resembled the marking on the underside of the black widow spider further reinforcing the unofficial nickname "Black Widow II" [17] given to the YF-23 because of its radar cross section plot shape that resembled a spider. When Northrop management found out about the marking, they had it removed. [19]

A proposed naval variant of the YF-23 known as the NATF-23 was considered as an F-14 Tomcat replacement. The original YF-23 design was first considered but would have had issues with flight deck space, handling, storage, landing, and catapult launching reasons requiring a different design. [20] A NATF-23 wind tunnel test model DP527, tested for 14,000 hours, was donated by Boeing in 2001 to the Bellefontaine Neighbors Klein Park Veterans Memorial. [21]

Design

A front view of 87-0800 showing the curving exterior of the design. YF-23 front.jpg
A front view of 87–0800 showing the curving exterior of the design.

The YF-23A (internally designated DP117K) was an unconventional-looking aircraft, with diamond-shaped wings, a profile with substantial area-ruling to reduce aerodynamic drag at transonic and supersonic speeds, and an all-moving V-tail. [6] The cockpit was placed high, near the nose of the aircraft for good visibility for the pilot. The aircraft featured a tricycle landing gear configuration with a nose landing gear leg and two main landing gear legs. The weapons bay was placed on the underside of the fuselage between the nose and main landing gear. [22] The cockpit has a center stick and side throttle. [23]

A rear view of a YF-23, showing its tile-lined exhaust channels YF-23 exhaust.jpg
A rear view of a YF-23, showing its tile-lined exhaust channels

It was powered by two turbofan engines with each in a separate engine nacelle with S-ducts, to shield engine axial compressors from radar waves, on either side of the aircraft's spine. [24] The inlets were trapezoidal in frontal profile, with special porous suction panels in front to absorb the turbulent boundary layer and vent it over the wings. Of the two aircraft built, the first YF-23 (PAV-1) was fitted with Pratt & Whitney YF119 engines, while the second (PAV-2) was powered by General Electric YF120 engines. The aircraft featured single-expansion ramp nozzles (SERN) and unlike the YF-22, does not employ thrust vectoring. [12] As on the B-2, the exhaust from the YF-23's engines flowed through troughs lined with tiles that are “transpiration cooled” to dissipate heat and shield the engines from infrared homing (IR) missile detection from below. [11] The YF-23's propulsion and aerodynamics enable it to supercruise at over Mach 1.6 without afterburners. [25]

YF-23 S-duct engine air intake Northrop McDonnell Douglas YF-23A PAV-1 87-0800 Black Widow II LEngineIntake R&D NMUSAF 25Sep09 (14414042127).jpg
YF-23 S-duct engine air intake

The flight control surfaces were controlled by a central management computer system. Raising the wing flaps and ailerons on one side and lowering them on the other provided roll. The V-tail fins were angled 50 degrees from the vertical. Pitch was mainly provided by rotating these V-tail fins in opposite directions so their front edges moved together or apart. Yaw was primarily supplied by rotating the tail fins in the same direction. Test pilot Paul Metz stated that the YF-23 had superior high angle of attack (AoA) performance compared to legacy aircraft, with trimmed AoA of up to 60°. [26] [27] Deflecting the wing flaps down and ailerons up on both sides simultaneously provided for aerodynamic braking. [28] To keep prototyping costs low despite the novel design, a number of "commercial off-the-shelf" components were used, including an F-15 nose wheel, F/A-18 main landing gear parts, and the forward cockpit components of the F-15E Strike Eagle. [11] [16]

Production F-23

The proposed production F-23 configuration (DP231 for the F119 engine and DP232 for the F120 engine) for full-scale development, or Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD), would have differed from the YF-23 prototypes in several ways. Instead of a single weapons bay, the EMD design would instead have two tandem bays in the lengthened forward fuselage, with the forward bay designed for short range AIM-9 missiles and the aft main bay for AIM-120 missiles and bombs; an M61 rotary cannon would be installed on the left side of the forward fuselage. The aircraft's overall length was slightly increased to 70 ft 5 in, volume was expanded, the nose was enlarged to accept mission systems, including the AESA radar, and the forebody chines were less pronounced and raised to the same height as the leading edge of the wing. The deletion of thrust reversers enabled the engine nacelles to have a smaller, more rounded cross-section and the space between them filled in to preserve area-ruling. The inlet design changed from the trapezoidal profile with suction panels to a serrated semicircular with a compression bump. The fuselage and empennage trailing edge pattern would also have fewer serrations and the engine thrust lines were toed in at 1.5° off center. [29]

NATF-23

The naval NATF-23 variant (designated DP527), the schematics of which surfaced in the 2010s, was different in many ways due to the requirements of aircraft carrier operations as well as a greater emphasis on long range sensors, weapons, and loiter time for fleet air defense; [30] [N 2] the diamond wings were located as far back as possible, and the aircraft has conventional canted vertical tails instead of the ruddervator with serrations for low RCS and increased maneuverability at low speeds for aircraft carrier operations, folding wing capability for flight deck storage, reinforced landing gear, tailhook and canards for landing on aircraft carriers and thrust vectoring nozzles. [31] The inlet design was also different, being a quarter circle with serrations with a bumped compression surface. The internal weapons bays would have accommodated the Navy's planned AIM-152 long-range missiles as well as potentially the AGM-88 HARM and AGM-84 Harpoon, while the bay doors would carry AIM-9 missiles; an M61 rotary cannon would be installed in the right wing. The NATF-23 had an increased 48 ft wingspan while length was reduced to 62 ft 8.5 in; folded wingspan would be 23 ft 4 in. [32]

Operational history

The two YF-23s fly over the Mojave Desert. They were nicknamed "Spider" (foreground), and "Gray Ghost" background) Northrop YF-23 DFRC.jpg
The two YF-23s fly over the Mojave Desert. They were nicknamed "Spider" (foreground), and "Gray Ghost" background)

Evaluation

The first YF-23, with Pratt & Whitney engines, supercruised at Mach 1.43 on 18 September 1990, while the second, with General Electric engines, reached Mach 1.72 on 29 November 1990. By comparison, the YF-22 achieved Mach 1.58 in supercruise. [33] The YF-23 was tested to a top speed of Mach 1.8 with afterburners and achieved a maximum angle-of-attack of 25°. [26] The maximum speed is classified, though sources state a speed greater than Mach 2 at altitude in full afterburner. [34] [35] The aircraft's weapons bay was configured for weapons launch, and used for testing weapons bay acoustics, but no missiles were fired; Lockheed fired AIM-9 Sidewinder and AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles successfully from its YF-22 demonstration aircraft. PAV-1 performed a fast-paced combat demonstration with six flights over a 10-hour period on 30 November 1990. Flight testing continued into December. [36] The two YF-23s flew 50 times for a total of 65.2 hours. [37] The tests demonstrated Northrop's predicted performance values for the YF-23. [38] While both designs met or exceeded all performance requirements, the YF-23 was stealthier and faster, but the YF-22 was more agile. [39] [40]

A YF-22 in the foreground with a YF-23 in the background YF-22 and YF-23.jpg
A YF-22 in the foreground with a YF-23 in the background

The two contractor teams submitted evaluation results with their proposals for full-scale development in December 1990, [38] and on 23 April 1991, Secretary of the Air Force Donald Rice announced that the YF-22 was the winner. [41] The Air Force selected the F119 engine to power the F-22 production version. The Lockheed and Pratt & Whitney designs were rated higher on technical aspects, were considered lower risks, and were considered to have more effective program management. [41] [42] It has been speculated in the aviation press that the YF-22 was also seen as more adaptable to the Navy's NATF, but by 1992 the U.S. Navy had abandoned NATF. [43] [44]

Following the competition, both YF-23s were transferred to NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards AFB, California, without their engines. [11] [45] NASA planned to use one of the aircraft to study techniques for the calibration of predicted loads to measured flight results, but this did not take place. [45] Both YF-23 airframes remained in storage until mid-1996, when the aircraft were transferred to museums. [45] [46]

Possible revival

In 2004, Northrop Grumman proposed a YF-23-based bomber called the FB-23 [N 3] "Rapid Theater Attack" (RTA) to meet a USAF need for an interim bomber, for which the FB-22 and B-1R were also competing. [47] [48] Northrop modified aircraft PAV-2 to serve as a display model for its proposed interim bomber. [38] The possibility of an FB-23 interim bomber ended with the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review, which favored a long-range bomber with much greater range. [49] [50] The USAF has since moved on to the Next-Generation Bomber and Long Range Strike Bomber program. [51]

Japan launched a program to develop a domestic 5th/6th generation (F-3) fighter after the US Congress refused in 1998 to export the F-22. After a great deal of study and the building of static models, the Mitsubishi X-2 Shinshin testbed aircraft flew as a technology demonstrator from 2016. By July 2018, Japan had gleaned sufficient information and decided that it would need to bring on-board international partners to complete this project. Northrop Grumman was one of the companies that responded and there was speculation that it could offer a modernized version of the YF-23 to Japan, while Lockheed Martin offered an airframe derived from the F-22; Japan ultimately did not select these proposals due to costs and industrial concerns. [52] [53]

Aircraft on display

Restoration work at the USAF Museum YF-23 in the restoration area of the usaf museum.jpg
Restoration work at the USAF Museum
YF-23 "Gray Ghost" on display at the USAF Museum at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 2023 PAV-1 Display.jpg
YF-23 "Gray Ghost" on display at the USAF Museum at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 2023
YF-23 "Spider" on display at the Western Museum of Flight, 2017 YF-23 PAV-2 "Spider" Static.jpg
YF-23 "Spider" on display at the Western Museum of Flight, 2017

Specifications (YF-23A)

YF-23 PAV-1 in flight YF-23 front right view.jpg
YF-23 PAV-1 in flight

Data from Pace, [57] Sweetman, [58] Winchester, [11] Aronstein, [34] and Metz & Sandberg [35]

General characteristics

Performance

Armament
None as tested but provisions made for: [11]

See also

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor</span> American stealth air superiority fighter

The Lockheed Martin/Boeing F-22 Raptor is an American single-seat, twin-engine, supersonic all-weather stealth fighter aircraft developed for the United States Air Force (USAF). As a product of the USAF's Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) program the aircraft was designed as an air superiority fighter, but also incorporates ground attack, electronic warfare, and signals intelligence capabilities. The prime contractor, Lockheed Martin, built most of the F-22's airframe and weapons systems and conducted final assembly, while program partner Boeing provided the wings, aft fuselage, avionics integration, and training systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">McDonnell XF-88 Voodoo</span> Prototype fighter aircraft

The McDonnell XF-88 Voodoo was a long-range, twinjet fighter aircraft with swept wings designed for the United States Air Force. Although it never entered production, its design was adapted for the subsequent supersonic F-101 Voodoo.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">McDonnell XF-85 Goblin</span> Experimental parasite fighter

The McDonnell XF-85 Goblin is an American prototype fighter aircraft conceived during World War II by McDonnell Aircraft. It was intended to deploy from the bomb bay of the Convair B-36 bomber as a parasite fighter. The XF-85's intended role was to defend bombers from hostile interceptor aircraft, a need demonstrated during World War II. McDonnell built two prototypes before the Air Force (USAAF) terminated the program.

Supercruise is sustained supersonic flight of a supersonic aircraft without using afterburner. Many supersonic military aircraft are not capable of supercruise and can maintain Mach 1+ flight only in short bursts with afterburners. Aircraft such as the SR-71 Blackbird are designed to cruise at supersonic speed with afterburners enabled.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lockheed F-94 Starfire</span> Series of all-weather interceptor aircraft

The Lockheed F-94 Starfire is a first-generation jet powered all-weather day/night interceptor aircraft designed and produced by Lockheed Corporation. It was the first operational United States Air Force (USAF) fighter equipped with an afterburner as well as being the first jet-powered all-weather fighter to enter combat during the Korean War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northrop YF-17</span> Prototype fighter aircraft for the US military

The Northrop YF-17 was a prototype lightweight fighter aircraft designed by Northrop aviation for the United States Air Force's Lightweight Fighter (LWF) technology evaluation program. The LWF was initiated because many in the fighter community believed that aircraft like the F-15 Eagle were too large and expensive for many combat roles. The YF-17 was the culmination of a long line of Northrop designs, beginning with the N-102 Fang in 1956, continuing through the F-5 family.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lockheed YF-12</span> American prototype interceptor aircraft

The Lockheed YF-12 was an American Mach 3+ capable, high-altitude interceptor prototype, developed and manufactured by American aerospace company Lockheed Corporation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Advanced Tactical Fighter</span> USAF demonstration and validation program

The Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) was a program undertaken by the United States Air Force to develop a next-generation air superiority fighter to counter emerging worldwide threats, including Soviet Sukhoi Su-27 and Mikoyan MiG-29 fighters under development in the 1980s, Beriev A-50 airborne warning and control system (AWACS), and increasingly sophisticated surface-to-air missile systems. Lockheed and Northrop were selected in 1986 to respectively develop the YF-22 and the YF-23 technology demonstrator aircraft for the program's demonstration and validation (Dem/Val) phase. These aircraft were evaluated in 1991 and the Lockheed design was selected for full-scale development, or engineering and manufacturing development (EMD), and later developed into the F-22 Raptor for production and operational service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pratt & Whitney F119</span> American low-bypass turbofan engine for the F-22 Raptor

The Pratt & Whitney F119, company designation PW5000, is an afterburning turbofan engine developed by Pratt & Whitney for the Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) program, which resulted in the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor. The engine delivers thrust in the 35,000 lbf (156 kN) class and was designed for sustained supersonic flight without afterburners, or supercruise. Delivering almost 22% more thrust with 40% fewer parts than its F100 predecessor, the F119 allows the F-22 to achieve supercruise speeds of up to Mach 1.8. The F119's nozzles incorporate thrust vectoring that enable them to direct the engine thrust ±20° in the pitch axis to give the F-22 enhanced maneuverability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North American XF-108 Rapier</span> Canceled interceptor aircraft project

The North American XF-108 Rapier was a proposed long-range, high-speed interceptor aircraft designed by North American Aviation intended to defend the United States from supersonic Soviet strategic bombers. The aircraft would have cruised at speeds around Mach 3 with an unrefueled combat radius over 1,000 nautical miles, and was equipped with radar and missiles offering engagement ranges up to 100 miles (160 km) against bomber-sized targets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lockheed YF-22</span> Prototype fighter aircraft for the US Air Force Advanced Tactical Fighter program

The Lockheed/Boeing/General Dynamics YF-22 is an American single-seat, twin-engine fighter aircraft technology demonstrator designed for the United States Air Force (USAF). The design was a finalist in the USAF's Advanced Tactical Fighter competition, and two prototypes were built for the demonstration/validation phase of the competition. The YF-22 won the contest against the Northrop YF-23, and the design was developed into the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor. The YF-22 has a similar aerodynamic layout and configuration as the F-22, but with differences in the position and design of the cockpit, tail fins and wings, and in internal structural layout.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iven C. Kincheloe Award</span>

The Iven C. Kincheloe Award recognizes outstanding professional accomplishment in the conduct of flight testing. It was established in 1958 by the Society of Experimental Test Pilots in memory of test pilot and Korean War ace Iven C. Kincheloe, United States Air Force, who died during flight testing.

Lockheed <i>Have Blue</i> Experimental stealth aircraft

Lockheed Have Blue was the code name for Lockheed's proof of concept demonstrator for a stealth fighter. Have Blue was designed by Lockheed's Skunk Works division, and tested at Groom Lake, Nevada. The Have Blue was the first fixed-wing aircraft whose external shape was defined by radar engineering rather than by aerospace engineering. The aircraft's faceted shape was designed to deflect electromagnetic waves in directions other than that of the originating radar emitter, greatly reducing its radar cross-section.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supersonic aircraft</span> Aircraft that travels faster than the speed of sound

A supersonic aircraft is an aircraft capable of supersonic flight, that is, flying faster than the speed of sound. Supersonic aircraft were developed in the second half of the twentieth century. Supersonic aircraft have been used for research and military purposes, but only two supersonic aircraft, the Tupolev Tu-144 and the Concorde, ever entered service for civil use as airliners. Fighter jets are the most common example of supersonic aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lightweight Fighter program</span> United States Air Force technology evaluation program

The Lightweight Fighter (LWF) program was a United States Air Force technology evaluation program initiated in the late 1960s by a group of officers and defense analysts known as the "Fighter Mafia". It was spurred by then-Major John Boyd's 'energy-maneuverability' (E-M) theory, which indicated that excessive weight would have severely debilitating consequences on the maneuverability of an aircraft. Boyd's design called for a light-weight fighter with a high thrust-to-weight ratio, high maneuverability, and a gross weight of less than 20,000 lb (9,100 kg), half that of its counterpart, the McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle. It resulted in the development of the General Dynamics YF-16 and Northrop YF-17. Late in the program, in 1974, with the promise of European sales, the Air Force changed the program name to Air Combat Fighter (ACF), and committed to purchasing 650 models of the YF-16, adopted as the F-16 Fighting Falcon. The U.S. Navy adopted a modified version of the YF-17 as the McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Electric YF120</span> American fighter variable-cycle turbofan engine

The General Electric YF120, internally designated as GE37, was a variable cycle afterburning turbofan engine designed by General Electric Aircraft Engines in the late 1980s and early 1990s for the United States Air Force's Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) program. It was designed to produce maximum thrust in the 35,000 lbf (156 kN) class. Prototype engines were installed in the two competing technology demonstrator aircraft, the Lockheed YF-22 and Northrop YF-23.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Teen Series</span> Group of American combat aircraft

The Teen Series is a popular name for a group of American combat aircraft. The name stems from a series of American supersonic jet fighters built for the United States Air Force and the United States Navy during the late 20th century. The designations system was the 1962 United States Tri-Service aircraft designation system, which reset the F-# sequence. The term typically includes the Grumman F-14 Tomcat, McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle, General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon, and McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lockheed XF-104 Starfighter</span> Experimental fighter aircraft

The Lockheed XF-104 Starfighter was a single-engine, high-performance, supersonic interceptor prototype for a United States Air Force (USAF) series of lightweight and simple fighters. Only two aircraft were built; one aircraft was used primarily for aerodynamic research and the other served as an armament testbed, both aircraft being destroyed in accidents during testing. The XF-104s were forerunners of over 2,500 production Lockheed F-104 Starfighters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fifth-generation fighter</span> Classification of sophisticated jet fighter aircraft entering service since 2005

A fifth-generation fighter is a jet fighter aircraft classification which includes major technologies developed during the first part of the 21st century. As of 2024, these are the most advanced fighters in operation. The characteristics of a fifth-generation fighter are not universally agreed upon, and not every fifth-generation type necessarily has them all; however, they typically include stealth, low-probability-of-intercept radar (LPIR), agile airframes with supercruise performance, advanced avionics features, and highly integrated computer systems capable of networking with other elements within the battlespace for situational awareness and C3 (command, control and communications) capabilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">411th Flight Test Squadron</span> United States Air Force military unit

The 411th Flight Test Squadron is a United States Air Force squadron assigned to the 412th Operations Group of Air Force Materiel Command, stationed at Edwards Air Force Base, California. It conducted the Advanced Tactical Fighter program flyoff competition between the Lockheed YF-22 and Northrop YF-23 prototypes. Following the completion of the competition, the squadron has conducted testing of the Lockheed Martin F-22.

References

Notes

  1. The prototype air vehicles were to be "best-effort" machines not meant to perform a competitive flyoff or represent a production aircraft that meets every requirement, but to demonstrate the viability of its concept.
  2. The DP527 drawings show the same F119 engines as the Air Force version, but the final powerplant may have been a modified variant with greater bypass ratio for improved fuel efficiency at the expense of supercruise performance.
  3. The "F/B-23" designation was also used.

Citations

  1. Rich, Michael and William Stanley. Improving U.S. Air Force Readiness and Sustainability. Rand Publications, April 1984. p. 7.
  2. Sweetman 1991, pp. 10–13.
  3. Miller 2005, p. 11.
  4. Williams 2002, p. 5.
  5. Miller 2005, pp. 13–14, 19.
  6. 1 2 Metz 2017, p. 31
  7. Goodall 1992, p. 94.
  8. Jenkins and Landis 2008, pp. 233–234.
  9. "ATF procurement launches new era". Flight International , 15 November 1986. p. 10. Retrieved 25 June 2011.
  10. Goodall 1992, p. 91.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Winchester 2005, pp. 198–199.
  12. 1 2 Miller 2005, p. 23.
  13. Sweetman 1991, pp. 23, 43.
  14. "YF-23 roll out marks ATF debut." Flight International , 27 June – 3 July 1990. p. 5. Retrieved 24 June 2011.
  15. Goodall 1992, p. 99.
  16. 1 2 Jenkins and Landis 2008, p. 237.
  17. 1 2 Timestamp 7:20
  18. Photo of PAV-2 information placard displaying the specifications as well as the PAV-2 nickname "Spider"
  19. Goodall 1992, p. 120.
  20. "Naval ATF to use Technologies Beyond Those in Air Force Version" 12 July 1990 Aerospace Daily ASD p. 59, Vol. 155, No. 8 English, 1990. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
  21. St. Louis Post-Dispatch (St. Louis, Missouri). 24 May 2001, Main Edition p. 100.
  22. Goodall 1992, pp. 108–115, 124.
  23. Walkaround. yf-23.net
  24. Sweetman 1991, pp. 42–44, 55.
  25. "Northrop-McDonnell Douglas YF-23A Black Widow II". National Museum of the U.S. Air Force.
  26. 1 2 "YF-23 would undergo subtle changes if it wins competition". Defense Daily 14 January 1991
  27. YF-23 Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) - Paul Metz (Part 1) , retrieved 11 November 2023
  28. Sweetman 1991, pp. 34–35, 43–45.
  29. Metz 2017, p. 54
  30. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives: Navy's Participation in Air Force's Advanced Tactical Fighter Program (PDF) (Report). United States Government Accounting Office. March 1990.
  31. Simonsen, Eric. "ATF Chapter 9", A Complete History of US Combat Aircraft Fly-Off Competitions, ISBN   1580072275.
  32. Metz 2017, p. 79
  33. Goodall 1992, pp. 102–03.
  34. 1 2 Aronstein 1998, p. 136.
  35. 1 2 Paul Metz, Jim Sandberg (27 August 2015). YF-23 DEM/VAL Presentation by Test Pilots Paul Metz and Jim Sandberg. Western Museum of Flight: Peninsula Seniors Production.
  36. Miller 2005, pp. 36, 39.
  37. Norris, Guy. "NASA could rescue redundant YF-23s." Flight International , 5–11 June 1991. p. 16. Retrieved: 25 June 2011.
  38. 1 2 3 Miller 2005, pp. 38–39.
  39. Goodall 1992, p. 110.
  40. Sweetman 1991, p. 55.
  41. 1 2 Jenkins and Landis 2008, p. 234.
  42. Miller 2005, p. 38.
  43. Miller 2005, p. 76.
  44. Williams 2002, p. 6.
  45. 1 2 3 4 "YF-23." NASA Dryden Flight Research Center , 20 January 1996. Retrieved: 25 June 2011.
  46. "Flashback: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II". U.S. Air Force Sustainment Center. 1 February 2022.
  47. Hebert, Adam J. "Long-Range Strike in a Hurry." Air Force magazine, November 2004. Retrieved: 24 June 2011.
  48. "YF-23 re-emerges for surprise bid". Flight International , 13 July 2004.
  49. "Quadrennial Defense Review Report." U.S. Department of Defense, 6 February 2006. Retrieved 25 June 2011.
  50. Hebert, Adam J. "The 2018 Bomber and Its Friends." Air Force magazine, October 2006. Retrieved 24 June 2011.
  51. Majumdar, Dave. "U.S. Air Force May Buy 175 Bombers." Defense News, 23 January 2011. Retrieved 29 August 2011.
  52. Mizokami, Kyle "Now Northrop Grumman Wants to Build Japan's New Fighter Jet" Popular Mechanics, 10 July 2018. Retrieved 15 August 2018.
  53. "Defense Ministry to develop own fighter jet to succeed F-2, may seek int'l project". Mainichi Shimbun. 4 October 2018. Archived from the original on 25 April 2019. Retrieved 28 April 2019.
  54. "Northrop-McDonnell Douglas YF-23A Black Widow II". National Museum of the U.S. Air Force, 6 November 2015. Retrieved 29 March 2018.
  55. Miller 2005, p. 39.
  56. "Static Displays"; "Northrop YF-23A 'Black Widow II'". Western Museum of Flight . Retrieved 31 August 2011.
  57. Pace 1999, pp. 14–15.
  58. Sweetman 1991, p. 93.
  59. 1 2 Sweetman 1991, pp. 42–43.

Bibliography

  • Aronstein, David C. and Michael J. Hirschberg. Advanced Tactical Fighter to F-22 Raptor: Origins of the 21st Century Air Dominance Fighter. Arlington, Virginia: AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics), 1998. ISBN   978-1-56347-282-4.
  • Goodall, James C. "The Lockheed YF-22 and Northrop YF-23 Advanced Tactical Fighters". America's Stealth Fighters and Bombers, B-2, F-117, YF-22, and YF-23. St. Paul, Minnesota: Motorbooks International Publishing, 1992. ISBN   0-87938-609-6.
  • Jenkins, Dennis R. and Tony R. Landis. Experimental & Prototype U.S. Air Force Jet Fighters. North Branch, Minnesota: Specialty Press, 2008. ISBN   978-1-58007-111-6.
  • Metz, Paul. Air Force Legends Number 220. Northrop YF-23. Forrest Lake, Minnesota: Specialty Press, 2017 ISBN   0989258378
  • Miller, Jay. Lockheed Martin F/A-22 Raptor, Stealth Fighter. Hinckley, UK: Midland Publishing, 2005. ISBN   1-85780-158-X.
  • Pace, Steve. F-22 Raptor. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999. ISBN   0-07-134271-0.
  • Sweetman, Bill. YF-22 and YF-23 Advanced Tactical Fighters. St. Paul, Minnesota: Motorbooks International Publishing, 1991. ISBN   0-87938-505-7.
  • Williams, Mel, ed. "Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor", Superfighters: The Next Generation of Combat Aircraft. London: AIRtime Publishing, 2002. ISBN   1-880588-53-6.
  • Winchester, Jim, ed. "Northrop/McDonnell Douglas YF-23", Concept Aircraft. Rochester, Kent, UK: Grange Books, 2005. ISBN   1-84013-809-2.