General Dynamics F-16XL

Last updated

F-16XL
General Dynamics F-16XL (SN 75-0749) in flight 060905-F-1234S-049.jpg
The F-16XL which competed with the F-15E for the USAF's Enhanced Tactical Fighter contract in 1984
RoleExperimental fighter
National originUnited States
Manufacturer General Dynamics
First flight3 July 1982
Retired2009
Primary users United States Air Force
NASA
Number built2
Developed from General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon

The General Dynamics F-16XL is a derivative of the F-16 Fighting Falcon with a cranked-arrow delta wing. It entered the United States Air Force's (USAF) Enhanced Tactical Fighter (ETF) competition in 1981 but lost to the F-15E Strike Eagle. The two prototypes were shelved until being turned over to NASA for additional aeronautical research in 1988. Both aircraft were fully retired in 2009 and stored at Edwards Air Force Base.

Contents

Development

SCAMP

The SCAMP design team in late 1977, starting left: Harry Hillaker, Andrew Lewis, Kenny Barnes, Jim Gordon Scamp team1.jpg
The SCAMP design team in late 1977, starting left: Harry Hillaker, Andrew Lewis, Kenny Barnes, Jim Gordon

Shortly after winning the lightweight fighter program, General Dynamics Fort Worth began investigating possible F-16 derivatives with the goal of enhancing both air-to-air and air-to-ground mission capabilities while retaining parts commonality with the F-16A. [1] Under the leadership of Harry Hillaker (designer of the original F-16), the Supersonic Cruise and Maneuver Prototype (SCAMP) project was started. Several wing designs were considered, including one using a forward-swept wing, but the large "cranked-arrow" wing (similar to that of the Saab 35 Draken) [note 1] was pursued due to its much more efficient lift-to-drag ratio at supersonic speeds. [2]

The company worked closely with NASA's Langley Research Center [3] and invested significant R&D funds for wind tunnel testing. Over several years the design was refined which led to the final F-16XL design by late 1980. [4]

Enhanced Tactical Fighter competition

F-16XL and a conventional F-16 F-16 and F-16XL aerial top down view.jpg
F-16XL and a conventional F-16

In 1980, the USAF signed on as a partner, [5] providing the fuselages of the third [note 2] and fifth [note 3] production F-16s for conversion. These two fuselages became the only examples of the F-16XL. [6]

In March 1981, the USAF announced the Enhanced Tactical Fighter (ETF) program to procure a replacement for the F-111 Aardvark. [7] The concept envisioned an aircraft capable of launching deep interdiction missions without requiring additional support in the form of fighter escorts or jamming support. General Dynamics submitted the F-16XL, while McDonnell Douglas submitted a variant of the F-15 Eagle. Though the two aircraft were competing for the same role, they had fairly different design approaches. The F-15E required very few alterations from its base F-15B or D, while the F-16XL had major structural and aerodynamic differences from the original F-16. [8] As such, the F-16XL would have required much more effort, time, and money to put into full production. [9] Additionally, the F-15E had two engines, which gave it a much higher maximum takeoff weight and redundancy in the case of engine failure. [9] [note 4]

In February 1984, the USAF awarded the ETF contract to McDonnell Douglas. [10] [11] [12] The two F-16XLs were returned to the Air Force and placed in storage at Edwards Air Force Base. [13] Had General Dynamics won the competition, the F-16XL would have gone into production as the F-16E/F (E for single seat, F for two seats). [14]

Design

An air-to-air left underside view of an F-16XL aircraft. The aircraft is armed with two wingtip-mounted AIM-9 Sidewinder and four fuselage-mounted AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles along with 12 Mark 82 500-pound bombs. F-16XL loaded with 500lb bombs.jpg
An air-to-air left underside view of an F-16XL aircraft. The aircraft is armed with two wingtip-mounted AIM-9 Sidewinder and four fuselage-mounted AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles along with 12 Mark 82 500-pound bombs.

The wing and rear horizontal control surfaces of the base F-16A were replaced with a cranked-arrow delta wing 115% larger than the original wing. [15] Extensive use of graphite-bismaleimide composites allowed the savings of 595 pounds (270 kg) of weight, [16] but the F-16XL-1 and XL-2 were 4,100 pounds (1,900 kg) and 5,600 pounds (2,500 kg) heavier respectively than the original F-16A. [17] [note 5]

Less noticeable is that the fuselage was lengthened by 56 inches (140 cm) by the addition of two sections at the joints of the main fuselage sub-assemblies. [15] With the new wing design, the tail section had to be canted up 3.16°, [18] and the ventral fins removed, to prevent them from striking the pavement during takeoff and landing. [19] The F-16XL-2 also received a larger inlet which would go on to be included in later F-16 variants. [20]

These changes resulted in a 25% improvement in lift-to-drag ratio in supersonic flight [21] while remaining comparable in subsonic flight, [22] and a plane that reportedly handled smoothly at high speeds and low altitudes. [23] The enlargements increased internal fuel capacity by 4,350 pounds (1,970 kg), or about 65%. [15] [note 6] The F-16XL could carry twice the ordnance of the F-16A and deliver it 50% farther. [26] The enlarged wing and strengthened hardpoints allowed for a highly configurable payload: [27]

NASA testing

NASA F-16XL #2 conducting laminar flow research F-16XL NASA.jpg
NASA F-16XL #2 conducting laminar flow research
Passive and active aerodynamic gloves were used during NASA testing F16xl2 glove diagram.jpg
Passive and active aerodynamic gloves were used during NASA testing
NASA F-16XL #1 flying alongside a NASA SR-71A NASA-F-16XL-and-SR-71A.jpg
NASA F-16XL #1 flying alongside a NASA SR-71A

In 1988, the two aircraft were turned over to NASA Ames-Dryden Flight Research Facility for supersonic laminar flow research for the High Speed Civil Transport (HSCT) program. [28] The F-16XL was considered ideal for these tests because of its cranked-arrow wing and high-speed, high-altitude capabilities. [29] The tests were carried out by a NASA and industry team [note 10] and were intended to achieve laminar flow over the wings, validate computational fluid dynamics (CFD) design methodology, and test active suction systems. [30] These tests involved the installation of either passive or active suction aerodynamic gloves. The active suction glove was intended to suck away turbulent airflow over the wings during supersonic flight, restoring laminar flow and reducing drag. [31] [32] [33] The NASA Langley Research Center developed and coordinated F-16XL experiments. [34]

F-16XL-1 was fitted with an active suction glove encasing the left wing. [35] Designed and built by North American Aviation, it had laser-cut holes that were nominally 0.0025 inches (0.064 mm) diameter at a uniform 2,500 per square inch (390/cm2) spacing. [35] The suction was provided by a Convair 880 air-conditioning turbocompressor where the 20mm cannon's ammunition had been. [31] [35] The glove covered over 5 square feet (0.46 m2) of the wing. Overall, F-16XL-1 completed 31 test flights for these tests from May 1990 to September 1992. [32] Afterwards, it was used to test takeoff performance, engine noise, and sonic boom phenomena. [36]

F-16XL-2 had its engine replaced with the more powerful General Electric F110-129. [12] [37] It achieved limited supercruise, a design goal of the F-16XL that was never attained in ETF testing, when it reached Mach 1.1 at 20,000 feet (6,100 m) on full military power. [38] It was mounted with a passive glove on the right wing and an active suction glove on the left wing. [32] The passive glove was fitted with instruments to measure the flow characteristics over the wing. [39] The active suction glove was designed and fabricated by Boeing; it was made of titanium and had over 12 million laser-cut holes, each 0.0025 inches (0.064 mm) in diameter, spaced 0.010 to 0.055 inches (0.025 to 0.140 cm) apart. [40] [31] [41] Suction was provided by a cabin-air pressurization turbocompressor from a Boeing 707, installed where the 20mm ammunition drum had been, which exhausted above the right wing. [42] [32] [33] Overall, F-16XL-2 performed 45 test flights from October 1995 to November 1996. [43] [31]

While "significant progress" was made towards achieving laminar flow at supersonic speeds, neither aircraft achieved the requisite laminar flow characteristics at intended speeds and altitudes. [44] [45] [46] Nonetheless, NASA officials considered the test program to have been successful. [32] NASA briefly investigated using a Tupolev Tu-144 which would more closely resemble the high-speed civil transport aircraft to continue supersonic laminar flow research, but did not pursue the idea due to a limited budget. [47]

At the conclusion of their test programs in 1999, both F-16XLs were placed into storage at NASA Dryden. [12] In 2007, Boeing and NASA studied the feasibility of returning F-16XL-1 to flight status and upgrading it with many of the improvements found in the USAF's F-16 Block 40 in order to further test sonic boom mitigation technology. [48] F-16XL-1 was taxi tested at Dryden and given systems checks. [48] However, both F-16XLs were retired in 2009 and stored at Edwards AFB. [49]

F-16XL aircraft on display

Specifications (F-16XL number 2)

Orthographically projected diagram of an F-16XL General Dynamics F-16XL afg-041110-016.jpg
Orthographically projected diagram of an F-16XL
Lasers illuminate airflow over a model F-16XL in a NASA wind tunnel F-16XL Scamp Flow Visualization Test - GPN-2000-001935.jpg
Lasers illuminate airflow over a model F-16XL in a NASA wind tunnel

Data from Darling, [51] F-16.net, [52] Piccirillo [53]

General characteristics

Performance

Armament

See also

Related development

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Delta wing</span> Triangle shaped aircraft wing configuration

A delta wing is a wing shaped in the form of a triangle. It is named for its similarity in shape to the Greek uppercase letter delta (Δ).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bell X-1</span> Experimental rocket-powered aircraft, the first airplane to break the sound barrier in level flight

The Bell X-1 is a rocket engine–powered aircraft, designated originally as the XS-1, and was a joint National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics–U.S. Army Air Forces–U.S. Air Force supersonic research project built by Bell Aircraft. Conceived during 1944 and designed and built in 1945, it achieved a speed of nearly 1,000 miles per hour in 1948. A derivative of this same design, the Bell X-1A, having greater fuel capacity and hence longer rocket burning time, exceeded 1,600 miles per hour in 1954. The X-1 aircraft #46-062, nicknamed Glamorous Glennis and flown by Chuck Yeager, was the first piloted airplane to exceed the speed of sound in level flight and was the first of the X-planes, a series of American experimental rocket planes designed for testing new technologies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North American XB-70 Valkyrie</span> Prototype supersonic strategic bomber

The North American Aviation XB-70 Valkyrie is a retired prototype version of the planned B-70 nuclear-armed, deep-penetration supersonic strategic bomber for the United States Air Force Strategic Air Command. Designed in the late 1950s by North American Aviation (NAA) to replace the aging B-52 Stratofortress and B-58 Hustler, the six-engined, delta-winged Valkyrie could cruise for thousands of miles at Mach 3+ while flying at 70,000 feet (21,000 m).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scramjet</span> Jet engine where combustion takes place in supersonic airflow

A scramjet is a variant of a ramjet airbreathing jet engine in which combustion takes place in supersonic airflow. As in ramjets, a scramjet relies on high vehicle speed to compress the incoming air forcefully before combustion, but whereas a ramjet decelerates the air to subsonic velocities before combustion using shock cones, a scramjet has no shock cone and slows the airflow using shockwaves produced by its ignition source in place of a shock cone. This allows the scramjet to operate efficiently at extremely high speeds.

Supercruise is sustained supersonic flight of a supersonic aircraft without using afterburner. Many supersonic military aircraft are not capable of supercruise and can maintain Mach 1+ flight only in short bursts with afterburners. Aircraft such as the SR-71 Blackbird are designed to cruise at supersonic speed with afterburners enabled.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northrop YF-23</span> Prototype fighter aircraft for the US Air Force Advanced Tactical Fighter program

The Northrop/McDonnell Douglas YF-23 is an American single-seat, twin-engine, supersonic stealth fighter aircraft technology demonstrator designed for the United States Air Force (USAF). The design was a finalist in the USAF's Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) competition, battling the Lockheed YF-22 for a production contract. Two YF-23 prototypes were built.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lockheed YF-12</span> American prototype interceptor aircraft

The Lockheed YF-12 was an American Mach 3+ capable, high-altitude interceptor prototype, developed and manufactured by American aerospace company Lockheed Corporation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NASA X-43</span> Unmanned US experimental supersonic aircraft, 1991-2000

The NASA X-43 was an experimental unmanned hypersonic aircraft with multiple planned scale variations meant to test various aspects of hypersonic flight. It was part of the X-plane series and specifically of NASA's Hyper-X program developed in the late 1990s. It set several airspeed records for jet aircraft. The X-43 is the fastest jet-powered aircraft on record at approximately Mach 9.6.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Douglas X-3 Stiletto</span> Experimental aircraft to test sustained supersonic flight

The Douglas X-3 Stiletto was a 1950s United States experimental jet aircraft with a slender fuselage and a long tapered nose, manufactured by the Douglas Aircraft Company. Its primary mission was to investigate the design features of an aircraft suitable for sustained supersonic speeds, which included the first use of titanium in major airframe components. Douglas designed the X-3 with the goal of a maximum speed of approximately 2,000 mph (3,200 km/h), but it was seriously underpowered for this purpose and could not even exceed Mach 1 in level flight. Although the research aircraft was a disappointment, Lockheed designers used data from the X-3 tests for the Lockheed F-104 Starfighter which used a similar trapezoidal wing design in a successful Mach 2 fighter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inlet cone</span> Supersonic aircraft component

Inlet cones are a component of some supersonic aircraft and missiles. They are primarily used on ramjets, such as the D-21 Tagboard and Lockheed X-7. Some turbojet aircraft including the Su-7, MiG-21, English Electric Lightning, and SR-71 also use an inlet cone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northrop X-21</span> Type of aircraft

The Northrop X-21A was an experimental aircraft designed to test wings with laminar flow control. It was based on the Douglas WB-66D airframe, with the wing-mounted engines moved to the rear fuselage and making space for air compressors. The aircraft first flew on 18 April 1963 with NASA test pilot Jack Wells at the controls. Although useful testing was accomplished, the extensive maintenance of the intricate laminar-flow system caused the end of the program.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supercritical airfoil</span> Airfoil designed primarily to delay the onset of wave drag in the transonic speed range

A supercritical aerofoil is an airfoil designed primarily to delay the onset of wave drag in the transonic speed range.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supersonic aircraft</span> Aircraft that travels faster than the speed of sound

A supersonic aircraft is an aircraft capable of supersonic flight, that is, flying faster than the speed of sound. Supersonic aircraft were developed in the second half of the twentieth century. Supersonic aircraft have been used for research and military purposes, but only two supersonic aircraft, the Tupolev Tu-144 and the Concorde, ever entered service for civil use as airliners. Fighter jets are the most common example of supersonic aircraft.

The Aerion SBJ was a supersonic business jet project designed by American firm Aerion Corporation. Unveiled in 2004, the designer sought a joint venture with a business aircraft manufacturer for a $1.2–1.4 billion development in 7–8 years. Aerion received 50 letters-of-intent before enlarging the design as the Aerion AS2 in 2014. Powered by two Pratt & Whitney JT8D-219 engines, the $80 million aircraft was to transport 8–12 passengers up to Mach 1.6 and up to 4,000 nmi (7,400 km).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">McDonnell Douglas F-15 STOL/MTD</span> USAF/NASA R&D aircraft

The McDonnell Douglas F-15 STOL/MTD is a modified F-15 Eagle. Developed as a technology demonstrator, the F-15 STOL/MTD carried out research for studying the effects of thrust vectoring and enhanced maneuverability. The aircraft used for the project was pre-production TF-15A (F-15B) No. 1, the first two-seat F-15 Eagle built by McDonnell Douglas, the sixth F-15 off the assembly line, and was the oldest F-15 flying up to its retirement. It was also used as the avionics testbed for the F-15E Strike Eagle program. The plane was on loan to NASA from the United States Air Force.

Boundary layer suction is a boundary layer control technique in which an air pump is used to extract the boundary layer at the wing or the inlet of an aircraft. Improving the air flow can reduce drag. Improvements in fuel efficiency have been estimated as high as 30%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High Speed Civil Transport</span> NASA project to develop a supersonic passenger aircraft

The High Speed Civil Transport (HSCT) was the focus of the NASA High-Speed Research (HSR) program, which intended to develop the technology needed to design and build a supersonic transport that would be environmentally acceptable and economically feasible. The aircraft was to be a future supersonic passenger aircraft, baselined to cruise at Mach 2.4, or more than twice the speed of sound. The project started in 1990 and ended in 1999.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon variants</span> Specific model of the F-16 fighter aircraft family

A large number of variants of the General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon have been produced by General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, and various licensed manufacturers. The details of the F-16 variants, along with major modification programs and derivative designs significantly influenced by the F-16, are described below.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aerion AS2</span> Cancelled supersonic business jet by Aerion Corporation

The Aerion AS2 was a proposed supersonic business jet that was being developed by Aerion Corporation. In May 2014, it was announced that the Aerion AS2 would be part of a larger Aerion SBJ redesign, which aimed for release after a seven-year developmental period. Aerion partnered with Airbus in September the same year. In December 2017, Airbus was replaced by Lockheed Martin. Its General Electric Affinity engine was unveiled in October 2018. In February 2019, Boeing replaced Lockheed Martin. Development stopped when Aerion ceased operations in May 2021.

References

Citations

  1. ↑ Piccirillo 2014 , p. 7: "These were oriented to extending range and payload, expanding basic missions, and developing advanced versions or derivative configurations of the aircraft. Importantly, these were intended to enhance both air-to-air and air-to-ground capabilities while retaining the maximum possible commonality with the basic F-16 design."
  2. 1 2 Piccirillo 2014, p. 7-10.
  3. ↑ Chambers 2000, pp. 156–158.
  4. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, pp. 34–35, 69–70.
  5. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, Chapter 3.
  6. 1 2 3 Piccirillo 2014 , pp. 76–77
  7. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, p. 149.
  8. ↑ Piccirillo 2014 , p. 159: "...the F-16E required major changes to the basic F-16 airframe. ... Changes required for the F-15E were not considered by the GAO to be as great as those needed for the F-16E, and mainly consisted of structural modifications to the wings as well as a strengthened landing gear."
  9. 1 2 3 Piccirillo 2014 , pp. 156–157
  10. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, p. 161.
  11. ↑ "February 24, 1984: F-15 Became the Air Force's New Dual-Role Fighter". www.aftc.af.mil. Air Force Flight Test Center. 24 February 2021. Archived from the original on 8 March 2023. Retrieved 8 March 2023.
  12. 1 2 3 Walton, Bill (2017-11-11). "The F-16XL: This Advanced F-16 Variant Lost Out To The F-15E Strike Eagle, But Was It Better?". Avgeekery.com. Archived from the original on 2023-02-12. Retrieved 2023-02-12.
  13. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, p. 169.
  14. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, p. 143.
  15. 1 2 3 4 Piccirillo 2014 , p. 69
  16. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, p. 74.
  17. 1 2 3 Piccirillo 2014 , pp. 60–61
  18. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, p. 78.
  19. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, p. 75.
  20. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, pp. 83–84.
  21. ↑ Piccirillo 2014 , p. 116: "As speed approached Mach 1.0, the F-16XL's comparative cruise efficiency improved, and at Mach 1.4, the F-16XL had a 25-percent-higher lift-to-drag ratio than that of the F-16C."
  22. ↑ Piccirillo 2014 , p. 9: "...the L/D ratios of the cranked-arrow, canard-delta, and baseline F-16 were essentially equal at subsonic speeds..."
  23. ↑ F. Clifton Berry Jr. "The Revolutionary Evolution of the F-16XL". Air & Space Forces Magazine. Archived from the original on 12 February 2023. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
  24. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, p. 84.
  25. 1 2 Piccirillo 2014, p. 116.
  26. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, p. 291.
  27. 1 2 3 4 Piccirillo 2014 , pp. 85–87
  28. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, pp. 183–184.
  29. ↑ Anders & Fischer 1999, p. 5.
  30. 1 2 Anders & Fischer 1999, p. 2.
  31. 1 2 3 4 5 Piccirillo 2014 , pp. 183–187
  32. 1 2 3 4 5 "NASA - NASA Dryden Technology Facts - F-16XL Supersonic Laminar Flow". www.nasa.gov. NASA. Archived from the original on 4 March 2023. Retrieved 4 March 2023.
  33. 1 2 Anderson & Bohn-Meyer 1992, pp. 2–3.
  34. ↑ "Past Projects: F-16XL Ship #2 Supersonic Laminar Flow Control". NASA. 10 May 2017. Archived from the original on 26 November 2022. Retrieved 5 March 2023.
  35. 1 2 3 Piccirillo 2014, pp. 199–202.
  36. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, p. 184.
  37. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, p. 202.
  38. ↑ Piccirillo 2014 , p. 202: "F-16XL-2 was also able to demonstrate limited supercruise performance by maintaining Mach 1.1 at an altitude of 20,000 feet in full military power without resorting to the use of afterburner."
  39. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, p. 206.
  40. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, pp. 209–210.
  41. ↑ Anders & Fischer 1999, p. 12.
  42. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, pp. 211–214.
  43. ↑ Anders & Fischer 1999, p. 23.
  44. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, pp. 226–227.
  45. ↑ Anderson & Bohn-Meyer 1992, pp. 4–5.
  46. ↑ Anders & Fischer 1999, pp. 40–42.
  47. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, pp. 227–228.
  48. 1 2 Piccirillo 2014 , pp. 281–283
  49. ↑ "F-16XL (Ship #1)". NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center. April 19, 2011. Archived from the original on June 19, 2016. Retrieved January 31, 2021.
  50. 1 2 "Aircraft Inventory List". The Flight Test Museum Foundation. Archived from the original on 18 March 2023. Retrieved 6 March 2023.
  51. ↑ Darling 2003, pp. 63, 64, 69.
  52. 1 2 "F-16 XL, Cranked-Arrow Wing", F-16, archived from the original on 22 April 2009, retrieved 18 April 2009.
  53. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, Chapter 4: Design and Construction Details.
  54. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, p. 71.
  55. 1 2 Piccirillo 2014, p. 203.
  56. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, p. 123.
  57. ↑ Piccirillo 2014, p. 303.

Notes

  1. ↑ The "cranked-arrow" delta wing originated with the Draken, which was studied by General Dynamics engineers during the SCAMP program. [2]
  2. ↑ Serial number 75-0747; would become F-16XL-2; had been severely damaged in an airshow accident in October 1980 [6]
  3. ↑ Serial number 75-0749; would become F-16XL-1 [6]
  4. ↑ F-16E would have had a maximum takeoff weight of 48,000 pounds (22,000 kg) versus F-15E's 80,000 pounds (36,000 kg) [9]
  5. ↑ Dry weights: XL-1 weighed 19,690 pounds (8,930 kg); XL-2 weighed 21,157 pounds (9,597 kg); F-16A weighed 15,586 pounds (7,070 kg) [17]
  6. ↑ Just under 11,300 pounds (5,100 kg), [24] [25] up from the F-16A's 6,950 pounds (3,150 kg) [15]
  7. ↑ Dummy AIM-120s, fabricated from wood & sheet metal, were scabbed onto the undersurfaces of the F-16XL flight demonstrators because the AIM-120 missile had yet to be integrated onto the standard F-16; incorporation of the semisubmerged missile housing with its associated ejector launcher would have required a separate development and integration effort. [27]
  8. ↑ Intended for a 300-gallon drop tank [27]
  9. ↑ Intended for either 2× 600-gallon drop tanks or 4× air-to-ground weapons, but not both simultaneously [27]
  10. ↑ NASA teams included the Ames-Dryden Flight Research Facility and Langley Research Center; industry partners were Boeing, McDonnell Douglas, and Rockwell International [30]
  11. ↑ Mach 2.0 was only achieved during the supersonic laminar flow tests from around 1990–1992; [55] maximum speed prior had been limited to Mach 1.95, though faster speeds were likely possible. [56]
  12. ↑ Ammunition bay was removed in 1991–1992 and replaced with a turbocompressor to provide suction for the aerodynamic glove tests [31]

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.