Outdated, chimeric reconstruction based on frontal appendage of H. saron and body of Innovatiocaris that was previously considered as whole body fossil of H. saron
H. saron, known from Maotianshan Shale in Yunnan, is first described in 1995 as Anomalocaris saron.[4] This species is only known from frontal appendages. There is a specimen (ELRC 20001) that is previously considered as whole body fossil of this species,[4] but later study shows that this specimen is not belonging to this species, and later given own genus Innovatiocaris.[5][6][7] Length of frontal appendage is up to at least 12cm.[2] Sometimes considered to belong to family Anomalocarididae[8][9] or Amplectobeluidae.[10][11]
Houcaris? magnabasis
Frontal appendage of H. magnabasis
Fossils of H. magnabasis including a frontal appendage and a partial oral cone (upper left corner)
H.? magnabasis, known from Pioche Shale and Pyramid shale in Nevada, is originally described as Anomalocaris cf. saron in 2003,[12] and later named as Anomalocaris magnabasis in 2019.[1] This species is only known from frontal appendages and some partial fossils of oral cone (mouthpart) and flaps.[1] Largest estimated length of frontal appendage is 17.5cm.[1] Sometimes considered to belong to family Anomalocarididae[8][9] or Amplectobeluidae.[10][11]
However, results from the phylogenetic analysis by McCall in 2023 suggest that H.? magnabasis does not form a monophyletic clade with other species of Houcaris, and that it is a sister taxon of the Amplectobeluidae. Thus, he tentatively referred to the species as Anomalocaris magnabasis, even though the results show that it also does not form a clade with known species of Anomalocaris.[3]
Houcaris? consimilis
Houcaris? consimilis
H.? consimilis is known from the Maotianshan Shales of South China and possibly the Latham Shale of California.[1] While this species was originally described within Ramskoeldia and a sister taxon of its type species (R. platyacantha), subsequent studies have rejected their monophyly. In 2022, this species was recovered as a basal member of the Tamisiocarididae close to H. saron by the describers of Innovatiocaris, and not monophyletic with R. platyacantha.[13] In 2023, on the basis of phylogenetic analysis and morphological comparison, McCall suggested that it does not form a monophyletic clade with R. platyacantha, but instead with H. saron, so he included this species within the genus as Houcaris consimilis. His results also consistently recover both species as a member of the Amplectobeluidae.[3] Based on their phylogenetic analysis from the 2024 study describing Shucaris and the first-known oral cone of H? consimilis, Wu and colleagues recovered H? consimilis as an amplectobeluid, but not as a sister taxon of R. platyacantha, and rejected the tamisiocaridid affinity.[14]
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
