Houcaris Temporal range: | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Fossils of H. magnabasis (B) and H. saron (D) | |
Scientific classification ![]() | |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Arthropoda |
Order: | † Radiodonta |
Genus: | † Houcaris Wu et al., 2021 |
Type species | |
Houcaris saron (Hou, Bergström, & Ahlberg, 1995) | |
Other species | |
|
Houcaris is a possibly paraphyletic radiodont genus, tentatively assigned to either Amplectobeluidae, Anomalocarididae or Tamisiocarididae, known from Cambrian Series 2 of China and the United States. The type species is Houcaris saron which was originally described as a species of the related genus Anomalocaris . [1] Other possible species include H. magnabasis and H. consimilis. [2] [3] The genus Houcaris was established for the two species in 2021 and honors Hou Xian-guang, who had discovered and named the type species Anomalocaris saron in 1995 along with his colleagues Jan Bergström and Per E. Ahlberg. [4]
H. saron, known from Maotianshan Shale in Yunnan, is first described in 1995 as Anomalocaris saron. [4] This species is only known from frontal appendages. There is a specimen (ELRC 20001) that is previously considered as whole body fossil of this species, [4] but later study shows that this specimen is not belonging to this species, and later given own genus Innovatiocaris . [5] [6] [7] Length of frontal appendage is up to at least 12 cm. [2] Sometimes considered to belong to family Anomalocarididae [8] [9] or Amplectobeluidae. [10] [11]
H.? magnabasis, known from Pioche Shale and Pyramid shale in Nevada, is originally described as Anomalocaris cf. saron in 2003, [12] and later named as Anomalocaris magnabasis in 2019. [1] This species is only known from frontal appendages and some partial fossils of oral cone (mouthpart) and flaps. [1] Largest estimated length of frontal appendage is 17.5 cm. [1] Sometimes considered to belong to family Anomalocarididae [8] [9] or Amplectobeluidae. [10] [11]
However, results from the phylogenetic analysis by McCall in 2023 suggest that H.? magnabasis does not form a monophyletic clade with other species of Houcaris, and that it is a sister taxon of the Amplectobeluidae. Thus, he tentatively referred to the species as Anomalocaris magnabasis, even though the results show that it also does not form a clade with known species of Anomalocaris. [3]
H.? consimilis is known from the Maotianshan Shales of South China and possibly the Latham Shale of California. [1] While this species was originally described within Ramskoeldia and a sister taxon of its type species (R. platyacantha), subsequent studies have rejected their monophyly. In 2022, this species was recovered as a basal member of the Tamisiocarididae close to H. saron by the describers of Innovatiocaris , and not monophyletic with R. platyacantha. [13] In 2023, on the basis of phylogenetic analysis and morphological comparison, McCall suggested that it does not form a monophyletic clade with R. platyacantha, but instead with H. saron, so he included this species within the genus as Houcaris consimilis. His results also consistently recover both species as a member of the Amplectobeluidae. [3] Based on their phylogenetic analysis from the 2024 study describing Shucaris and the first-known oral cone of H? consimilis, Wu and colleagues recovered H? consimilis as an amplectobeluid, but not as a sister taxon of R. platyacantha, and rejected the tamisiocaridid affinity. [14]