Judiciary of Zambia

Last updated

The Judiciary of Zambia is the branch of the Government of the Republic of Zambia which interprets and applies the country's laws to ensure impartial justice under law and to provide a mechanism for dispute resolution. Under the 1991 Constitution, justices and magistrates are independent of the government and subject only to the Constitution and the law.

Contents

According to the constitutional amendments of Act No. 2 of 2016, the structure of the judicature shall comprise the Supreme Court, with an equal ranking to the Constitutional Court, the appeals court, the High Court, the Subordinate Court, the Local Court and such lower Courts as may be prescribed by an Act of Parliament. [1] [2]

The functions of the Judiciary include the administration of justice through resolving disputes between individuals or between individual and the state, interpreting the constitution and the laws of Zambia, promoting the rule of law, and protecting the human rights of individuals and groups. [3]

Supreme Court

Supreme Court, Lusaka Zambia Supreme Court.JPG
Supreme Court, Lusaka

The Supreme Court of Zambia is the final Court of appeal and has the final say in all legal matters, including the interpretation of the Constitution. It consists of the Chief Justice, the Deputy Chief Justice and seven or more Supreme Court Judges. It is located in Independence Avenue, Lusaka. [4]

The Constitutional Court of Zambia

Zambia in 2016 Amended the Republican Constitution which created the new Court called "The Constitutional Court of Zambia". Locally nicknamed as the Concourt, which is established by Articles 127,128 and 129. This Court is constitutionally clothed with the power of interpreting Presidential Elections, Constitutional Supremacy, constitution, Members of Parliament appeal cases which are at first heard by the High Court. The Court ranks equivalently or at par the Supreme Court of Zambia. The judicial decision of the Constitutional Court of Zambia is final and non-appealable to the Supreme Court. Subject to Article 28, this Court does not hear bill of rights because the 2016 Referendum failed to gainer sufficient votes to amend the Bill of Rights. For now the Bill of Rights cases are heard by the High Court of Zambia.

The Court of Appeal of Zambia

This Court is the third highest Court of Appeal in Zambia below the Constitutional Court and Supreme Court. It is above the High Court of Zambia it has jurisdiction all appeal matters emanating from the High Court. A case cannot go direct to the Supreme Court and the parties must obtain leave of the Court of Appeal according the Rules of the Court of Appeal 2016.The Court has no jurisdiction to interpret the Constitution when a matter asrises to do the constitution the Court of Appeal will halt the procceedings and refer the matter to the Constitutional Court of Zambia for Interpretation.

High court

The High court's role is judicial review, in other terms interpretation of the law. They have the power to declare any law or ordinance unconstitutional if it is found to be against the Zambian Constitution. A High Court alone can certify the cases fit for appeal before the Supreme Court. [5]

This court can be categorized into three separate courts namely family courts, business court and industrial relations. [6]

Industrial relations courts

Located within Supreme Court premises. It is responsible for labour related cases. It is a division of high court that adjudicates over labour matters. The high Court rules apply to it.

 It was initially located where the court of appeal is located today.

Subordinate courts

These are the lower courts and the courts of the first instance, and are graded as first, second or third class. They can decide all matters except for offences of treason, murder and all matters that involve interpretations of the Constitution and are presided over by Resident Magistrates of appropriate status. [7]

Small claims courts

The Small Claims Courts deal with minor financial claims (less than K 20,000) except in certain circumstances.the cases are civil in nature and are handled by commissioners. [8]

Local courts

The Local Courts deal with customary matters, it also not a court of record because there's no strict adherence to what the law says the cases are civil in nature. They are also limited in terms of the severity of the sentences they can impose. [9]

Law

Before the end of BSAC administration, Northern Rhodesian law was in conformity with the laws of England and Wales and its High Court of Northern Rhodesia was ultimately subordinate to those of the United Kingdom. This continued after 1924; all United Kingdom statutes in force on 17 August 1911 were applied to Northern Rhodesia, together with those of later years if specific to the Protectorate. Where Africans were parties before courts, Native law and customs were applied, except if they were "repugnant to natural justice or morality", or inconsistent with any other law in force. [10]

Subsidiary Courts

Below the High Court were Magistrates' Courts which fell into four classes:

  1. Courts of Provincial Commissioners, Senior Resident Magistrates and Resident Magistrates. In criminal matters, such courts could impose sentences of imprisonment for up to three years; in civil matters, they were limited to awards of £200 and for recovery of land worth up to £144 annual rent.
  2. Courts of District Commissioners. In criminal matters, they could impose sentences of imprisonment for up to one year without confirmation by the High Court; they could also impose up to three years' imprisonment with the High Court's consent. Their civil jurisdiction was limited to £100.
  3. Courts of District Officers.
  4. Courts of Cadets attached to the Provincial Administration.

Criminal trials for treason, murder and manslaughter, or attempts and conspiracies to commit them, were reserved for the High Court. Civil matters relating to constitutional issues, wills and marriages were also restricted to the High Court.

Native Courts

The Native Courts Ordinance 1937 allowed the Governor to issue a warrant recognising native courts. Their jurisdiction only covered natives but extended to criminal and civil jurisdiction. Native courts were not allowed to impose the death penalty, nor try witchcraft without permission. There was also provision for a Native Court of Appeal, but if not established, appeal was to the Provincial Commissioner and thence to the High Court.

Chief Justices of North-Eastern Rhodesia

IncumbentTenureNotes
Took officeLeft office
Sir Leicester Paul Beaufort 19011911

Chief Justices of Northern Rhodesia

IncumbentTenureNotes
Took officeLeft office
Cyril Gerard Brooke Francis [11] 1941afterwards Chief Justice of Bermuda, 1941
Sir Herbert Charles Fahie Cox [12] [13] 19451951afterwards Chief Justice of Tanganyika
Sir Arthur Werner Lewey [14] 19511955
Sir (Edward) Peter Stubbs Bell 19551957Died in office
John Bowes Griffin 19571957acting Chief Justice
Sir George Paterson19571961
Sir Diarmaid William Conroy 19611964afterwards Chief Justice of Zambia, 1964–1965

Chief Justice

The chief justice of Zambia is an ex-officio Judge of the High Court.

List of chief justices [15]

Related Research Articles

The Courts of England and Wales, supported administratively by His Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service, are the civil and criminal courts responsible for the administration of justice in England and Wales.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Malaysia</span> Largely centralized system

Judiciary of Malaysia is largely centralised despite Malaysia's federal constitution, heavily influenced by the English common law, as well as Islamic jurisprudence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High Court of Singapore</span> Lower division of national supreme court

The High Court of Singapore is the lower division of the Supreme Court of Singapore, the upper division being the Court of Appeal. The High Court consists of the chief justice and the judges of the High Court. Judicial Commissioners are often appointed to assist with the Court's caseload. There are two specialist commercial courts, the Admiralty Court and the Intellectual Property Court, and a number of judges are designated to hear arbitration-related matters and insolvency matters respectively. In 2014 the Family Division of the High Court was created, and in 2015 the Singapore International Commercial Court ("SICC") was established as a division of the High Court. The current divisions of the High Court are the General Division and the Appellate Division. The seat of the High Court is the Supreme Court Building.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme court</span> Highest court in a jurisdiction

In most legal jurisdictions, a supreme court, also known as a court of last resort, apex court, and highcourt of appeal, and court of final appeal, is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are binding on all other courts in a nation and are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts. A supreme court can also, in certain circumstances, act as a court of original jurisdiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Pakistan</span> National judicial system

The judiciary of Pakistan is the national system of courts that maintains the law and order in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Pakistan uses a common law system, which was introduced during the colonial era, influenced by local medieval judicial systems based on religious and cultural practices. The Constitution of Pakistan lays down the fundamentals and working of the Pakistani judiciary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Spain</span> Highest court in Spain

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the Kingdom of Spain. The court has original jurisdiction over cases against high-ranking officials of the Kingdom and over cases regarding the legalization of political parties. It also has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all cases. The Court has the power of judicial review, except for the judicial revision on constitutional matters, reserved to the Constitutional Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of India</span> National court system

The judiciary of India is the system of courts that interpret and apply the law in the Republic of India. The Constitution of India provides concept for a single and unified judiciary in India. India uses a mixed legal system based majorly on the common law system with civil laws applicable in certain territories in combination with certain religion specific personal laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Courts of South Africa</span>

The courts of South Africa are the civil and criminal courts responsible for the administration of justice in South Africa. They apply the law of South Africa and are established under the Constitution of South Africa or under Acts of the Parliament of South Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Spain</span> System of law courts in Spain

The Judiciary of Spain consists of Courts and Tribunals, composed of judges and magistrates (Justices), who have the power to administer justice in the name of the King of Spain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Jamaica</span>

The judiciary of Jamaica is based on the judiciary of the United Kingdom. The courts are organized at four levels, with additional provision for appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London. The Court of Appeal is the highest appellate court. The Supreme Court has unlimited jurisdiction in all cases, and sits as the Circuit Court to try criminal cases. The Parish Court in each parish hears both criminal and civil cases, excluding grave offences. The Petty Sessions are held under Justices of the Peace, with power to hear minor crimes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Italy</span> Overview of Italian judiciary

The judiciary of Italy is composed of courts and public prosecutor offices responsible for the administration of justice in the Italian Republic. These offices are occupied by judges and prosecutors respectively, who are known as magistrates. Magistrates belong to the magistracy, one branch of the State that Italian citizens may access if they hold an Italian Juris Doctor and successfully partake in one of the relevant competitive public examinations organised by the Ministry of justice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Nauru</span> Court in Nauru

The Supreme Court of Nauru was the highest court in the judicial system of the Republic of Nauru until the establishment of the Nauruan Court of Appeal in 2018.

Law in the Republic of Vanuatu consists of a mixed system combining the legacy of English common law, French civil law and indigenous customary law. The Parliament of Vanuatu is the primary law-making body today, but pre-independence French and British statutes, English common law principles and indigenous custom all enjoy constitutional and judicial recognition to some extent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High Court (Kenya)</span> Highest court of Kenya

The High Court of Kenya is a court of unlimited original jurisdiction in criminal and civil matters established under article 165 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 as part of the Kenyan Judiciary. It also has supervisory jurisdiction over all other subordinate courts and any other persons, body or authority exercising a judicial or quasi-judicial function. It was known as the Supreme Court of Kenya until 1964. Its name has remain unchanged since then.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Namibia</span>

The judiciary of Namibia consists of a three-tiered set of courts, the Lower, High and Supreme Courts. Parallel to this structure there are traditional courts dealing with minor matters and applying customary law.

The Judiciary of Sri Lanka are the civil and criminal courts responsible for the administration of justice in Sri Lanka. The Constitution of Sri Lanka defines courts as independent institutions within the traditional framework of checks and balances. They apply Sri Lankan Law which is an amalgam of English common law, Roman-Dutch civil law and Customary Law; and are established under the Judicature Act No 02 of 1978 of the Parliament of Sri Lanka.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Malawi</span>

The Judiciary of Malawi is the branch of the Government of Malawi which interprets and applies the laws of Malawi to ensure equal justice under law and to provide a mechanism for dispute resolution. The legal system of Malawi is based on English law, modified since 1969. The Constitution defines the judiciary as a hierarchical system of courts, with the highest court being a Supreme Court of Appeal, together with a High Court and a number of magistrates' courts. Malawian judiciary has frequently demonstrated its independence in recent years. The Constitutional Court of Malawi nullified the 2019 election results, citing widespread irregularities. The Supreme Court upheld the verdict of the Constitutional Court. Five Constitutional Court judges who overturned the results of the 2019 election have been nominated by the UK thinktank Chatham House for the 2020 Chatham House Prize. Ultimately the judges went onto win the prize.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Tanzania</span>

The Judiciary of Tanzania is the system of courts that interprets and applies the law in Tanzania. The current judiciary bases its foundation to the constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania of 1977. Under the Constitution of Tanzania, Justices and Magistrates are independent of the government and subject only to the Constitution and the law. The country has a dual juristition system where there is a judicial structure responsible for Tanzania Mainland and another for Zanzibar. The Court of Appeal of the United Republic was established in 1979 as the final appellate judicial body with jurisdiction over the entire union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Burundi</span>

The Judiciary of Burundi is the branch of the Government of the Republic of Burundi which interprets and applies the laws of Burundi to ensure impartial justice under law and to provide a mechanism for dispute resolution. The independence of the judiciary is guaranteed by the constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Sierra Leone</span>

The Judiciary of Sierra Leone is the branch of the Government of the Republic of Sierra Leone which interprets and applies the laws of Sierra Leone to ensure impartial justice under law and to provide a mechanism for dispute resolution. The independence of the judiciary is guaranteed by the constitution.

References

  1. "Introduction". Judiciary of Zambia. Archived from the original on 12 March 2014. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
  2. https://www.parliament.gov.zm/sites/default/files/documents/amendment_act/Constitution%20of%20Zambia%20%20(Amendment),%202016-Act%20No.%202_0.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  3. "Arms of Government". Electoral Commission of Zambia. Retrieved 2022-05-23.
  4. "Supreme Court". Judiciary of Zambia. Archived from the original on 28 June 2016. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
  5. Mulenga Besa (2019), Constitution, Governance and Democracy, Mission Press, Ndola, edited by Kwivwa Mudolo
  6. "High Courts". Judiciary of Zambia. Archived from the original on 28 June 2016. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
  7. "Subordinate Courts". Judiciary of Zambia. Archived from the original on 29 October 2015. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
  8. "Small Claims Court". Judiciary of Zambia. Archived from the original on 19 April 2016. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
  9. "Local Courts". Judiciary of Zambia. Archived from the original on 28 June 2016. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
  10. G. D. Clough, (1924). The Constitutional Changes in Northern Rhodesia and Matters Incidental to the Transition, pp. 279–80.
  11. "No. 35097". The London Gazette . 7 March 1941. p. 1364.
  12. "No. 37457". The London Gazette . 5 February 1946. p. 818.
  13. "No. 39391". The London Gazette . 23 November 1951. p. 6120.
  14. "No. 39417". The London Gazette . 25 December 1951. p. 6707.
  15. "Evolution of Judiciary since 1964". Davies M.M.Chanda. Retrieved 22 February 2016.