Livability

Last updated
Vienna ranked the most livable city in the world in 2022 and 2023 . Panorama-Vienna-Haas-Haus-Peterkirche.jpg
Vienna ranked the most livable city in the world in 2022 and 2023 .

Livability or liveability is the degree to which a place is good for living. [2] Livability refers to the concerns that are related to the long-term wellbeing of individuals and communities. It encompasses factors like neighborhood amenities, including parks, open space, walkways, grocery shops and restaurants as well as environmental quality, safety and health. It also incorporates things like cost and friendliness. These features contribute to the pleasantness and accessibility of communities. [3] Additionally, livability considers the availability and quality of public transport, educational institutions and healthcare facilities. It also considers the overall cultural and social atmosphere of a place, including the presence of diverse recreational activities and community engagement opportunities. All these factors combined create an environment that enhances the overall quality of life for residents.

Contents

Researchers studying urban planning have increasingly embraced livability themes in recent decades. However, there is no universally accepted definition of livability, with each academic offering a little bit of variation. Various definitions result from the fact that, depending on their study specialties, different academics approach the idea of livability in different ways. According to many scholars, livability is a difficult notion to describe and quantify. [3] [4] [5] This is because livability encompasses a wide range of factors such as access to amenities, safety, environmental quality and social cohesion. Additionally, the nature of livability and the differences between each urban environment make it challenging to establish a standardized measure that applies universally across diverse urban contexts.

City livability is assessed annually by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) and tracked through its global livability ranking. In 2023, Vienna in Austria ranked first for the second year in a row as the most livable city. [1]

Background

The study of livability may be approached from a variety of angles, and each angle has its own goals and scientific approach. However, research about livability is just recently underway. The idea initially came into existence in the 1960s, when social indicators were being studied as part of scientific research on quality of life. The term "livability" was first used to describe the 1980s-era increase in interest in the study of urban quality of life. [6] Depending on how it is interpreted in the context of the neighborhood, livability can be defined according to a number of different guiding principles.

Differences with the quality of life

The term quality of life is also used by politicians and economists to measure the livability of a given city or nation. Two widely known measures of livability are the Economist Intelligence Unit's Where-to-be-born Index and Mercer's Quality of Living Reports. These two measures calculate the livability of countries and cities around the world, respectively, through a combination of subjective life-satisfaction surveys and objective determinants of quality of life such as divorce rates, safety, and infrastructure. [7] Such measures relate more broadly to the population of a city, state or country, not to individual quality of life. Livability has a long history and tradition in urban design, and neighborhoods design standards such as LEED-ND are often used in an attempt to influence livability.

Differences between livability and quality of life. Differences between livability and quality of life.png
Differences between livability and quality of life.

While the quality of life relates to the individual's inspiration and physical and psychological standing in life, livability is more concerned with the individual's connection with the urban place and is one of the determinants of measuring the quality of life. [8] Livability is an objective assessment that takes into account factors such as access to amenities, safety, transportation, and environmental quality. [9] It focuses on how comfortable and enjoyable a city or neighborhood is to live in, whereas quality of life is more subjective and encompasses a broader range of personal factors, including health, education, income, and social relationships. [6]

Livability principles

There are several livability-related principles, some of which are established by the local government in each country, as is the case in the United States and Singapore. These principles aim to ensure that cities and communities are designed and managed in a way that promotes the well-being and quality of life for their residents. They cover various aspects such as access to healthcare, education, transportation, affordable housing, green spaces, and cultural amenities. Additionally, these principles often prioritize sustainability and environmental considerations to create more resilient and livable cities for future generations.

In the US

Cambridge, Massachusetts has been ranked as one of the top five livable cities in the US in 2023. Massachusetts Avenue (Cambridge, Massachusetts).jpg
Cambridge, Massachusetts has been ranked as one of the top five livable cities in the US in 2023.

Six livability criteria that are essential for every neighborhood have been defined by the US Partnership for Sustainable Communities [11] . They are as follows:

In Singapore

Singapore has been chosen as the most livable city for East Asian expatriates in 2022 . Singapore skyline from Pearl Bank.jpg
Singapore has been chosen as the most livable city for East Asian expatriates in 2022 .

Singapore developed ten livability principles for dense cities during a workshop hosted by the Urban Land Institute and Centre for Livable Cities in 2012. About sixty-two leaders, specialists and practitioners from many fields of urban planning and development attended the workshop, where they provided the following guidelines. [13]

Livability in mixed-use developments

Facilities that serve the local population as well as an adequate quantity of mixed uses in an acceptable allocation and ratio all contribute to the mixed-use area's increased livability. [14] These facilities include ones for education, entertainment, shopping, and health and medical care. An essential component of livability is the accessibility of those facilities. [15] Similarly, as they have a significant positive impact on society, the environment and the economy, the neighborhood must have a sufficient number of public open spaces and other recreational facilities. [16] Public parks, plazas and other open areas are crucial because they aid in easing the crowded feeling that mixed-use communities frequently experience.

Milano Central Station is an example of a transport hub in a metropolitan city. Having well-connected public transport is one of the parameters used to assess the livability of a city. Milano Centrale during sunset.jpg
Milano Central Station is an example of a transport hub in a metropolitan city. Having well-connected public transport is one of the parameters used to assess the livability of a city.

Many of the studies emphasized the beneficial impacts of green spaces on people's health and overall well-being. [17] People are more likely to encounter each other when these open spaces are present, especially in communities with a variety of uses and a high population density. These social connections might strengthen the neighborhood's sense of belonging. Others contend; however, that because of overcrowding and the bad associations that go along with it, individuals prefer to retreat from social interaction in high-density neighborhoods, causing each social group to be confined within itself. [18]

Giving individuals more opportunities to walk around their neighborhoods would boost the sense of security since more people will feel like they are being watched on the streets. [19] However, other academics argue that as the number of residents and workers in a community increases, a sense of anonymity would develop, which might raise crime rates. [20] Overall, community management plans and upkeep are frequently associated with a perceived sense of safety in the area. [21]

Additionally, the housing size inside a dense urban fabric has a significant impact on how satisfied locals are with their area. Some researchers contend that this feeling of compactness can be diminished by a well thought-out design that considers the socioeconomic and cultural context of the residents and how they affect the overall neighborhood experience. [22] While there is no set standard for dwelling size, a small dwelling size reduces the feeling of privacy and is one of the drawbacks associated with dense urban neighborhoods. [23]

The availability of a transportation system, together with a neighborhood's with a balanced mix of uses, is considered by scholars to be one of the most crucial factors in a neighborhood's livability. [24] Although livability principles were not taken into consideration, conventional methods of transportation design mainly focused on the need to reduce traffic congestion, allow quick automotive circulation and satisfy parking demands. [25] So, in order to make a neighborhood more livable, there must be a variety of transportation alternatives that are available and usable by people of all ages, from all socioeconomic backgrounds and from all financial levels. [24] Other researchers suggest that extremely congested mixed-use neighborhoods encourage the deployment of substantially better quality public transportation options. [26]

Challenges to livability

There are several challenges to livability. These challenges can be subdivided into several categories such as Urbanization and population growth, income distribution and affordability issues, environmental sustainability and climate challenge and urban planning and infrastructure development.

Urbanization and population growth

Urbanization and population growth pose challenges to livability as cities become overcrowded, leading to increased traffic congestion, inadequate housing and strain on resources such as water and energy. Furthermore, rapid urbanization and population growth often result in the loss of green spaces and biodiversity, further compromising the quality of life in cities. Additionally, these challenges can exacerbate social inequalities and create a lack of access to essential services and amenities for certain populations within urban areas. [27]

Income distribution and affordability issues

Income inequality and affordability issues further impact livability, as lower-income individuals struggle to access affordable housing, healthcare and education, widening the gap between socioeconomic classes. [28] Some cities still lack good quality affordable housing. This is forcing many families to make difficult trade-offs between housing quality, space, and neighborhood amenities. In Bangkok, for example, many residents must make lengthy commutes from the suburbs into the city for work due to a lack of affordable housing in the urban core. [29] Many people reside in deteriorated dwellings, which lacks amenities like running water, heating and cooling, and sanitary facilities and is particularly susceptible to flooding.

Environmental sustainability and climate change

Environmental sustainability and climate challenges threaten livability by causing pollution, extreme weather events and the degradation of natural resources. One of the biggest challenges is figuring out how to lessen traffic and create effective transportation systems that can accommodate an expanding urban population. [30] Additionally, circumstances brought on by local patterns of land use, transportation, and energy consumption in addition to global environmental change. These conditions affect the abilities of cities to maintain their infrastructures, provide a reliable supply of services, and support the lives and livelihoods of people. [27] [31]

Urban planning and infrastructure development

Urban planning and infrastructure development play an important role in laying the foundation for livable cities. [32] Investments in critical services like schools, particularly for people living in rural areas who lack access to high-quality educational institutions, parks, and other necessities for an active daily lifestyle. [29] These assets, collectively referred to as "social infrastructure," are essential for fostering neighborhood social networks and encouraging local living. [33] For instance, residents who live in an area with a variety of social infrastructure can take care of their daily needs close by, walk to the store and interact with their neighbors. Residents' opportunities to be active and interact with friends are reduced when they must travel outside of their neighborhood to meet these needs in the absence of a diverse social infrastructure close to home. [34]

Improving livability

Recent studies on the topic of livability have pointed out some common trends that cities have adopted to improve livability in the long term. This improvement can be achieved through:

Technology and smart cities

Technology and smart cities play a crucial role in creating livable cities. By integrating technology into urban planning and development, cities can improve efficiency, sustainability and quality of life for their residents. This includes implementing smart grids to manage energy consumption, using sensors and data analytics to monitor and address environmental issues, and providing digital platforms for citizen engagement and participation. [35] Additionally, smart cities leverage technology to enhance mobility through intelligent transportation systems, such as smart traffic management and real-time public transportation updates. [36]

Integration of nature and green spaces

Integration of nature and green spaces is another key aspect of smart cities. By incorporating parks, gardens, and green infrastructure into urban planning, smart cities prioritize the well-being of residents and promote a healthier environment. These green spaces not only provide recreational areas for residents but also help improve air quality, reduce the heat island effect and support biodiversity. Overall, the integration of nature into smart cities creates a more sustainable and enjoyable living environment for their inhabitants. [37]

Remote work and its impact on livability

Remote work has also had a significant impact on the livability of smart cities. With the ability to work from anywhere, residents have more flexibility in choosing where they want to live. [38] This has led to a decentralization of urban areas, reducing traffic congestion and improving the quality of life for residents by allowing them to escape crowded city centers. Additionally, remote work has also fostered a stronger sense of community as people have more time to engage in local activities and connect with their neighbors.

Changing demographics and evolving needs

Changing demographics and evolving needs have also influenced the development of smart cities. As the population ages, there is a growing demand for age-friendly infrastructure and services, such as accessible transportation and healthcare facilities. [39] Moreover, the increasing focus on sustainability and environmental conservation has prompted smart cities to prioritize renewable energy sources and implement eco-friendly practices to reduce their carbon footprint. [40] [41]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smart growth</span> Urban planning philosophy

Smart growth is an urban planning and transportation theory that concentrates growth in compact walkable urban centers to avoid sprawl. It also advocates compact, transit-oriented, walkable, bicycle-friendly land use, including neighborhood schools, complete streets, and mixed-use development with a range of housing choices. The term "smart growth" is particularly used in North America. In Europe and particularly the UK, the terms "compact city", "urban densification" or "urban intensification" have often been used to describe similar concepts, which have influenced government planning policies in the UK, the Netherlands and several other European countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Urban design</span> Designing and shaping of human settlements

Urban design is an approach to the design of buildings and the spaces between them that focuses on specific design processes and outcomes. In addition to designing and shaping the physical features of towns, cities, and regional spaces, urban design considers 'bigger picture' issues of economic, social and environmental value and social design. The scope of a project can range from a local street or public space to an entire city and surrounding areas. Urban designers connect the fields of architecture, landscape architecture and urban planning to better organize physical space and community environments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Land-use planning</span> Process of regulating the use of land by a central authority

Land use planning or Land-use regulation is the process of regulating the use of land by a central authority. Usually, this is done to promote more desirable social and environmental outcomes as well as a more efficient use of resources. More specifically, the goals of modern land use planning often include environmental conservation, restraint of urban sprawl, minimization of transport costs, prevention of land use conflicts, and a reduction in exposure to pollutants. In the pursuit of these goals, planners assume that regulating the use of land will change the patterns of human behavior, and that these changes are beneficial. The first assumption, that regulating land use changes the patterns of human behavior is widely accepted. However, the second assumption - that these changes are beneficial - is contested, and depends on the location and regulations being discussed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Urban sprawl</span> Expansion of auto-oriented, low-density development in suburbs

Urban sprawl is defined as "the spreading of urban developments on undeveloped land near a more or less densely populated city". Urban sprawl has been described as the unrestricted growth in many urban areas of housing, commercial development, and roads over large expanses of land, with little concern for very dense urban planning. Sometimes the urban areas described as the most "sprawling" are the most densely populated. In addition to describing a special form of urbanization, the term also relates to the social and environmental consequences associated with this development. In modern times some suburban areas described as "sprawl" have less detached housing and higher density than the nearby core city. Medieval suburbs suffered from the loss of protection of city walls, before the advent of industrial warfare. Modern disadvantages and costs include increased travel time, transport costs, pollution, and destruction of the countryside. The revenue for building and maintaining urban infrastructure in these areas are gained mostly through property and sales taxes. Most jobs in the US are now located in suburbs generating much of the revenue, although a lack of growth will require higher tax rates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Living street</span> Traffic calming in spaces shared between road users

A living street is a street designed with the interests of pedestrians and cyclists in mind. Living streets also act as social spaces, allowing children to play and encouraging social interactions on a human scale, safely and legally. Living streets consider all pedestrians granting equal access to elders and those who are disabled. These roads are still available for use by motor vehicles; however, their design aims to reduce both the speed and dominance of motorized transport. The reduction of motor vehicle dominance creates more opportunities for public transportation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sustainable urban infrastructure</span>

Sustainable urban infrastructure expands on the concept of urban infrastructure by adding the sustainability element with the expectation of improved and more resilient urban development. In the construction and physical and organizational structures that enable cities to function, sustainability also aims to meet the needs of the present generation without compromising the capabilities of the future generations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Center for Neighborhood Technology</span> Non-profit transportation civic organization in Chicago

The Center for Neighborhood Technology (CNT) is a non-profit organization, headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, which is committed to sustainable development and urban communities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Infill</span> Rededication of land in an urban environment to new construction

In urban planning, infill, or in-fill, is the rededication of land in an urban environment, usually open-space, to new construction. Infill also applies, within an urban polity, to construction on any undeveloped land that is not on the urban margin. The slightly broader term "land recycling" is sometimes used instead. Infill has been promoted as an economical use of existing infrastructure and a remedy for urban sprawl. Detractors view increased urban density as overloading urban services, including increased traffic congestion and pollution, and decreasing urban green-space. Many also dislike it for social and historical reasons, partly due to its unproven effects and its similarity with gentrification.

The term "sustainable communities" has various definitions, but in essence refers to communities planned, built, or modified to promote sustainable living. Sustainable communities tend to focus on environmental and economic sustainability, urban infrastructure, social equity, and municipal government. The term is sometimes used synonymously with "green cities," "eco-communities," "livable cities" and "sustainable cities."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mixed-use development</span> Type of urban development strategy

Mixed use is a type of urban development, urban design, urban planning and/or a zoning classification that blends multiple uses, such as residential, commercial, cultural, institutional, or entertainment, into one space, where those functions are to some degree physically and functionally integrated, and that provides pedestrian connections. Mixed-use development may be applied to a single building, a block or neighborhood, or in zoning policy across an entire city or other administrative unit. These projects may be completed by a private developer, (quasi-)governmental agency, or a combination thereof. A mixed-use development may be a new construction, reuse of an existing building or brownfield site, or a combination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green infrastructure</span> Sustainable and resilient infrastructure

Green infrastructure or blue-green infrastructure refers to a network that provides the “ingredients” for solving urban and climatic challenges by building with nature. The main components of this approach include stormwater management, climate adaptation, the reduction of heat stress, increasing biodiversity, food production, better air quality, sustainable energy production, clean water, and healthy soils, as well as more human centered functions, such as increased quality of life through recreation and the provision of shade and shelter in and around towns and cities. Green infrastructure also serves to provide an ecological framework for social, economic, and environmental health of the surroundings. More recently scholars and activists have also called for green infrastructure that promotes social inclusion and equity rather than reinforcing pre-existing structures of unequal access to nature-based services.

The EcoDensity Initiative was officially launched in 2006 in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, in conjunction with the World Urban Forum. The initiative was a response to deconcentration of urban land use due to urban sprawl. The initiative used density, design and land use as catalysts towards livability, affordability and environmental sustainability. Some of the program's objectives were to reduce car reliance, deliver more efficient urban land use, improve green energy systems and build a resilient and adaptable community. In high-density urban areas, utilizing the existing infrastructure and transit and community amenities tends to lead towards a more sustainable and livable state. Accordingly, EcoDensity was designed to strategically enhance densification with the primary aim of efficiently structured neighbourhoods, denser urban-patterns and increased affordable housing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Walkability</span> How accessible a space is to walking

In urban planning, walkability is the accessibility of amenities by foot. It is based on the idea that urban spaces should be more than just transport corridors designed for maximum vehicle throughput. Instead, it should be relatively complete livable spaces that serve a variety of uses, users, and transportation modes and reduce the need for cars for travel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthy community design</span> Urban planning to facilitate healthy lifestyles

Healthy community design is planning and designing communities that make it easier for people to live healthy lives. Healthy community design offers important benefits:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Land recycling</span> Reuse of abandoned buildings or sites

Land recycling is the reuse of abandoned, vacant, or underused properties for redevelopment or repurposing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Compact city</span> High density mixed use transit oriented planning

The compact city or city of short distances is an urban planning and urban design concept, which promotes relatively high residential density with mixed land uses. It is based on an efficient public transport system and has an urban layout which – according to its advocates – encourages walking and cycling, low energy consumption and reduced pollution. A large resident population provides opportunities for social interaction as well as a feeling of safety in numbers and "eyes on the street". It is also arguably a more sustainable urban settlement type than urban sprawl because it is less dependent on the car, requiring less infrastructure provision.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sustainable urbanism</span> Study of cities and the practices to build them

Sustainable urbanism is both the study of cities and the practices to build them (urbanism), that focuses on promoting their long term viability by reducing consumption, waste and harmful impacts on people and place while enhancing the overall well-being of both people and place. Well-being includes the physical, ecological, economic, social, health and equity factors, among others, that comprise cities and their populations. In the context of contemporary urbanism, the term cities refers to several scales of human settlements from towns to cities, metropolises and mega-city regions that includes their peripheries / suburbs / exurbs. Sustainability is a key component to professional practice in urban planning and urban design along with its related disciplines landscape architecture, architecture, and civil and environmental engineering. Green urbanism and ecological urbanism are other common terms that are similar to sustainable urbanism, however they can be construed as focusing more on the natural environment and ecosystems and less on economic and social aspects. Also related to sustainable urbanism are the practices of land development called Sustainable development, which is the process of physically constructing sustainable buildings, as well as the practices of urban planning called smart growth or growth management, which denote the processes of planning, designing, and building urban settlements that are more sustainable than if they were not planned according to sustainability criteria and principles.

Environmental, ecological or green gentrification is a process in which cleaning up pollution or providing green amenities increases local property values and attracts wealthier residents to a previously polluted or disenfranchised neighbourhood. Green amenities include green spaces, parks, green roofs, gardens and green and energy efficient building materials. These initiatives can heal many environmental ills from industrialization and beautify urban landscapes. Additionally, greening is imperative for reaching a sustainable future. However, if accompanied by gentrification, these initiatives can have an ambiguous social impact. More specifically, in certain cases the introduction of green amenities might lead to (1) the physical displacement of low income households due to soaring housing costs, and/or (2) the cultural, social, and political displacement of long-time residents. First coined by Sieg et al. (2004), environmental gentrification is a relatively new concept, although it can be considered as a new hybrid of the older and wider topics of gentrification and environmental justice. Social implications of greening projects specifically with regards to housing affordability and displacement of vulnerable citizens. Greening in cities can be both healthy and just.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Walking city</span> One small enough to navigate on foot

A walking city or walkable city is a type of city that is created to avoid internal transportation, and therefore be small enough that a person can use walking to navigate the city. It is characterized by narrow, often winding streets. Its transport system is inherently egalitarian, with no one being disadvantaged by a lack of transport, unlike modern automotive cities. Walkability within areas positively impacts equity, sustainability, health, social benefits, less demand on other modes, economic development, and enjoyment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">15-minute city</span> Urban accessibility concept

The 15-minute city is an urban planning concept in which most daily necessities and services, such as work, shopping, education, healthcare, and leisure can be easily reached by a 15-minute walk, bike ride, or public transit ride from any point in the city. This approach aims to reduce car dependency, promote healthy and sustainable living, and improve wellbeing and quality of life for city dwellers.

References

  1. 1 2 "The world's most liveable cities in 2023". The Economist. ISSN   0013-0613 . Retrieved 2023-07-06.
  2. "Cambridge." . Oxford Dictionary of National Biography . Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. 2004-09-23. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/91103.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  3. 1 2 Wheeler, Stephen (2013-06-11). Planning for Sustainability: Creating Livable, Equitable and Ecological Communities (2 ed.). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203134559. ISBN   978-0-203-13455-9.
  4. Balsas, Carlos J.L. (February 2004). "Measuring the livability of an urban centre: an exploratory study of key performance indicators". Planning Practice and Research. 19 (1): 101–110. doi:10.1080/0269745042000246603. ISSN   0269-7459. S2CID   154330917.
  5. Heylen, Kristof (July 2006). "Liveability in social housing: three case studies in Flanders". ENHR Conference'Housing in an Expanding Europe: Theory, Policy, Implementation and Participation.
  6. 1 2 Myers, Dowell (1987). "Community-Relevant Measurement of Quality of Life: A Focus on Local Trends". Urban Affairs Quarterly. 23 (1): 108–125. doi:10.1177/004208168702300107. ISSN   0042-0816. S2CID   25604850.
  7. Paul, Arpan; Sen, Joy (December 2020). "A critical review of liveability approaches and their dimensions". Geoforum. 117: 90–92. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.008. PMC   7529590 . PMID   33024343.
  8. van Kamp, Irene; Leidelmeijer, Kees; Marsman, Gooitske; de Hollander, Augustinus (2003-09-15). "Urban environmental quality and human well-being: Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study". Landscape and Urban Planning. Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing. 65 (1): 5–18. Bibcode:2003LUrbP..65....5V. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00232-3. ISSN   0169-2046. S2CID   41480338.
  9. Mirzahossein, Hamid; Mohghaddam, Seyyed Ali Alamdar (2021). "Increasing Citizen's Livability in the Future City: Responsive City, a Remarkable Solution". Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management. 16 (3): 23–41. ISSN   2065-3913. JSTOR   27035544.
  10. Tanner, Jeremy (2023-03-25). "These are the most livable US cities in 2023, study finds". The Hill. Retrieved 2023-07-06.
  11. "US Partnership for Sustainable Communities" (PDF). whitehouse.gov. 2015-03-12. Retrieved 2023-07-06.
  12. Firth, Jack (2022). "Singapore is once again the most liveable location in the world, despite worsening scores". www.eca-international.com. Retrieved 2023-07-06.
  13. "10 Principles for Liveable High Density Cities Lessons from Singapore". www.clc.gov.sg. 2013. Retrieved 2023-07-06.
  14. Chiara, Joseph De; Panero, Julius; Zelnik, Martin (1995). Time-Saver Standards for Housing and Residential Development. McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN   978-0-07-016301-0.
  15. Pacione, Michael (April 1989). "Access to urban services — the case of secondary schools in Glasgow". Scottish Geographical Magazine. 105 (1): 12–18. doi:10.1080/00369228918736746. ISSN   0036-9225.
  16. Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission, ed. (2008). A state of liveability: an inquiry into enhancing Victoria's liveability. Melbourne: Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission. ISBN   978-1-921337-41-3.
  17. Hartig, Terry (November 2008). "Green space, psychological restoration, and health inequality". The Lancet. 372 (9650): 1614–1615. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61669-4. PMID   18994650. S2CID   19609171.
  18. Churchman, Arza (May 1999). "Disentangling the Concept of Density". Journal of Planning Literature. 13 (4): 389–411. doi:10.1177/08854129922092478. ISSN   0885-4122. S2CID   62795223.
  19. Jacobs, Allan; Appleyard, Donald (1987-03-31). "Toward an Urban Design Manifesto". Journal of the American Planning Association. 53 (1): 112–120. doi:10.1080/01944368708976642. ISSN   0194-4363. S2CID   8056496.
  20. Newman, Oscar (1978). Defensible space: crime prevention through urban design. Architecture, urban affairs (3. print ed.). New York: Collier Books [u.a.] ISBN   978-0-02-000750-0.
  21. Dempsey, N.; Brown, C.; Bramley, G. (2012-04-01). "The key to sustainable urban development in UK cities? The influence of density on social sustainability". Progress in Planning. The key to sustainable urban development in UK cities? The influence of density on social sustainability. 77 (3): 89–141. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2012.01.001. ISSN   0305-9006.
  22. Bretherton, J; Pleace, N (2008). Residents' Views of New Forms of High Density Affordable Living. York/Coventry: Joseph Rowntree Foundation/Chartered Institute of Housing. ISBN   978-1-905018-54-3.
  23. McCarthy, Dennis; Saegert, Susan (September 1978). "Residential density, social overload, and social withdrawal". Human Ecology. 6 (3): 253–272. Bibcode:1978HumEc...6..253M. doi:10.1007/BF00889026. ISSN   0300-7839.
  24. 1 2 Vuchic, Vukan (2017-10-31). Transportation for Livable Cities. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351318167. ISBN   978-1-351-31816-7.
  25. Zhu, Wenjian; Chiu, Rebecca L.H. (2011), Yuen, Belinda; Yeh, Anthony G.O. (eds.), "The Planning and Design of Environmentally Sustainable High-Rises", High-Rise Living in Asian Cities, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 49–64, doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9738-5_4, ISBN   978-90-481-9738-5 , retrieved 2023-07-06
  26. Burton, Elizabeth; Jenks, Mike; Williams, Katie, eds. (2003-09-02). The Compact City (0 ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203362372. ISBN   978-1-135-81699-5.
  27. 1 2 Ruth, Matthias; Franklin, Rachel S. (2014-05-01). "Livability for all? Conceptual limits and practical implications". Applied Geography. The New Urban World. 49: 18–23. Bibcode:2014AppGe..49...18R. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.018. ISSN   0143-6228. PMC   4203665 . PMID   25339785.
  28. Bach, Ursula (December 2018). "Copenhagen: resilience and liveability". Field Actions Science Reports. The Journal of Field Actions (in French) (Special Issue 18): 30–33. ISSN   1867-139X.
  29. 1 2 Alderton, Amanda (2019). "Five liveability challenges Melbourne and Bangkok must face together". www.rmit.edu.au. Retrieved 2023-07-06.
  30. Dietrich, Ingolf (2022-06-14). "Transforming Cities for a Liveable Future for All - Urbanet". Urbanet. Retrieved 2023-07-06.
  31. Jr, Brian Stone (2012-04-16). The City and the Coming Climate: Climate Change in the Places We Live. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-1-107-37928-2.
  32. Mouratidis, Kostas (2021). "Urban planning and quality of life: A review of pathways linking the built environment to subjective well-being". Cities . 115: 103229. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103229 . hdl: 11250/2753943 .
  33. Higgs, Carl; Boulange, Claire; Gunn, Lucy; Davern, Melanie; Roberts, Rebecca (2017-10-17). "Some suburbs are being short-changed on services and liveability – which ones and what's the solution?". The Conversation. Retrieved 2023-07-06.
  34. Casey, Sharyn (2005). Establishing Standards for Social Infrastructure (PDF). UQ Boilerhouse Community Engagement Centre.
  35. Wong, Gary (2023-03-06). "How data-driven solutions are improving urban livability". TechNative. Retrieved 2023-07-06.
  36. Sofeska, Emilija (2017-01-01). "Understanding the Livability in a City Through Smart Solutions and Urban Planning Toward Developing Sustainable Livable Future of the City of Skopje". Procedia Environmental Sciences. Green Urbanism (GU). 37: 442–453. Bibcode:2017PrEnS..37..442S. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.014 . ISSN   1878-0296.
  37. Turner-Skoff, Jessica B.; Cavender, Nicole (October 2019). "The benefits of trees for livable and sustainable communities". Plants, People, Planet. 1 (4): 323–335. Bibcode:2019PlPPl...1..323T. doi: 10.1002/ppp3.39 . ISSN   2572-2611. S2CID   198409159.
  38. Manzini, Ezio (2022-02-10). Livable Proximity: Ideas for the City that Cares. EGEA spa. ISBN   978-88-238-8381-9.
  39. Rui, Jin; Othengrafen, Frank (2023). "Examining the Role of Innovative Streets in Enhancing Urban Mobility and Livability for Sustainable Urban Transition: A Review". Sustainability. 15 (7): 5709. doi: 10.3390/su15075709 . ISSN   2071-1050.
  40. Hunt, D. V. L.; Makana, L. O.; Jefferson, I.; Rogers, C. D. F. (2016-05-01). "Liveable cities and urban underground space". Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. Urban Underground Space: A Growing Imperative Perspectives and Current Research in Planning and Design for Underground Space Use. 55: 8–20. Bibcode:2016TUSTI..55....8H. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.015. ISSN   0886-7798.
  41. Robert, Kates W.; Parris, Thomas M.; Leiserowitz, Anthony A. (April 2005). "What is Sustainable Development? Goals, Indicators, Values, and Practice". Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 47 (3): 8–21. Bibcode:2005ESPSD..47c...8R. doi:10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444. ISSN   0013-9157. S2CID   154882898.

Further reading