Massachusetts Convention of Towns

Last updated • 8 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia
Massachusetts Convention of Towns
View of Faneuil-Hall in Boston, Massachusetts, March 1789.jpg
History
Founded09/22/1768
Disbanded09/28/1768
Preceded by Massachusetts General Assembly (disbanded)
Succeeded by Massachusetts Provincial Congress
Leadership
Chairman
Meeting place
Faneuil Hall

The Massachusetts Convention of Towns (September 22–29, 1768) was an extralegal assembly held in Boston in response to the news that British troops would soon be arriving to crack down on anti-British rioting. Delegates from 96 Massachusetts towns gathered in Faneuil Hall to discuss their options. The more militant faction, led by James Otis Jr., Samuel Adams, and John Hancock, wanted to organize an armed resistance. The more conservative faction, led by convention chairman Thomas Cushing, preferred to lodge a written complaint. The conservatives won out, and the delegates endorsed a series of mild resolutions before disbanding.

Contents

History

Background

Colonial map showing Castle Island at the entrance to Boston's inner harbor Boston area colonial map.jpg
Colonial map showing Castle Island at the entrance to Boston's inner harbor
Thomas Cushing, chairman of the convention Thomas Cushing, Member of Continental Congress.jpg
Thomas Cushing, chairman of the convention

In February 1768, the Massachusetts House of Representatives issued a circular letter denouncing the Townshend Acts and sent it to representatives of the other colonies. Lord Hillsborough, the Secretary of State for the Colonies, ordered the House to rescind the letter. When the House refused to comply, Governor Francis Bernard dissolved the Massachusetts general assembly. This led to an outbreak of mob violence from colonists who no longer had any legal way to deal with their grievances. [1]

On June 10, when customs officers seized John Hancock's sloop, Liberty , the rioting grew so intense that the officers were forced to seek refuge at Castle William, an island fort in Boston Harbor. Governor Bernard urged the British ministry to send troops to Boston "to rescue the Government out of the hands of a trained mob." [2] On September 3, the governor unofficially let it be known that British troops would soon be arriving. [3]

Rumors spread that thousands of redcoats were coming to terrorize and oppress the people of Boston. Colonists feared that a standing army, garrisoned among civilians, would force them to submit to unconstitutional acts of parliament and reduce them to "the very borders of slavery." [3] Samuel Adams declared, "We will take up arms and spend our last drop of blood before the King and Parliament shall impose on us and settle Crown Officers in this country to dragoon us." [4] The Sons of Liberty began holding secret meetings in Boston to plan a resistance movement. Among other things, they discussed the possibility of taking over Castle William, which was not occupied by British troops but by Massachusetts militiamen. From there, they would be able to repel the British fleet as it approached the inner harbor. As one observer put it, "the Gunners could sink every ship that attempted the Castle." [5]

Boston town meeting

Led by Samuel Adams, James Otis Jr., and Joseph Warren, Boston held a town meeting at Faneuil Hall on September 12 and 13, with Otis as moderator. A large number of Sons of Liberty were in attendance. Their first order of business was to send a message to Governor Bernard asking for the general court to be summoned immediately. When the governor denied their request, claiming he needed permission from his superiors, the discussion took on a more menacing tone. [5]

To avoid being charged with treason, the patriots spoke on the pretext that the colonies were in imminent danger of being invaded by the French. They urged all Bostonians to arm themselves, as required by local law, with "a well fixed Firelock Musket Accoutrement and Ammunition," to be used against "the enemy" if need be. The town arms, which had been removed from storage for cleaning, were put on display in the hall. A motion to distribute them among the people right then and there was rejected as too extreme, but Otis added that "there are the Arms, when an attempt is made against your Liberties they will be delivered, our declaration wants no explanation." [6]

The Bostonians adopted a number of resolutions asserting their rights, declaring that to garrison a standing army among them without their consent was unconstitutional, and vowing to defend not only the King, but their own rights as British subjects "at the utmost peril of their lives and fortunes." They also resolved to hold a province-wide conference starting on the 22nd, and appointed Otis, Adams, Hancock, and Thomas Cushing to the organizing committee. [7] Soon afterwards, the selectmen sent a circular letter to the towns outlining their concerns and inviting them to send delegates to the convention. [8] Thomas Hutchinson, then serving as lieutenant governor, wrote later that the meeting "had a greater tendency towards a revolution in government, than any preceding measures in any of the colonies." [9]

Around the same time as the town meeting, the Sons of Liberty constructed a crude beacon out of a turpentine barrel and mounted it on a pole on Beacon Hill. The plan was to light the beacon as soon as the British warships were spotted, as a signal to Massachusetts residents from further inland that it was time to march to Boston and "destroy every Soldier that dares put his Foot on Shore." The selectmen were ordered to take the beacon down; when they refused, the sheriff removed it. On September 19, Governor Bernard officially announced that several regiments from Halifax and Ireland were on their way. [10]

The convention

Fanueil Hall, late 18th c. View of Faneuil-Hall in Boston, Massachusetts, March 1789.jpg
Fanueil Hall, late 18th c.

Delegates from 96 Massachusetts towns and 8 districts [11] began converging in Boston on September 22, 1768. The convention lasted a week. [12] Slightly more than half the delegates were the same men who had represented their towns in the Massachusetts House earlier that year. [13] For some reason, James Otis missed the first three days; his absence likely had a demoralizing effect on the other militants. [12]

The overall tone of the convention was considerably more conservative than that of the Boston town meeting. Thomas Cushing declared that the purpose of the convention, in his view, was to "bring together some prudent people who would be able to check the violent designs of Others." Samuel Adams tried to influence the crowd in a more radical direction, but the moderates held firm. Many had been warned by their constituents to be cautious and not to take part in anything subversive. [12] There were exceptions: Middleborough came out explicitly against the landing of troops, and Braintree and Lexington denounced standing armies as unconstitutional. [14] Most of the delegates from the country, however, were more cautious than the Bostonians. The convention's very first act was to reassure the governor that they did not pretend to have any official authority. [15]

When the delegates politely petitioned the governor to summon the general court, Bernard ordered the convention to disband at once, claiming it was illegal. [12] His response had a chilling effect on some of the more timid members, but the convention continued. The delegates petitioned the king for the redress of grievances in the most respectful terms, professing their loyalty and their "love of peace and good order." [16] Nevertheless, historian Richard D. Brown argues that the very existence of the convention demonstrates that a revolutionary attitude was spreading through Massachusetts: the majority of politically active towns showed that they were ready to defy the governor by attending an extralegal assembly. [17] John C. Miller calls the convention the precursor to the Massachusetts Provincial Congress. [18]

Consequences

British troops entering Boston, 1768. Illustration from a 1904 history book. British troops in Boston.jpg
British troops entering Boston, 1768. Illustration from a 1904 history book.

Before the convention ended, a rumor spread through London that Massachusetts was openly rebelling and had called up the militia to fight the British. The news was so disturbing that stock prices dropped on the London exchange. [19] [20]

When the troops sailed into Boston Harbor that October, they approached cautiously, ready for a fight. With their guns trained on the town, the ships lined up as if preparing for a formal siege. According to Thomas Cushing, the troops landed "in Battle Array, expecting from the representations that had been made to them, to meet with a violent opposition." [21] [22]

By this time the militant Bostonians had submitted to the will of the moderate majority. They knew they could not defeat the British alone. Unopposed, the soldiers marched through Boston and took control of Faneuil Hall. Although the patriots tried to obstruct them by denying them housing, even that effort failed, and the soldiers were quartered in town. [21]

After all their incendiary talk, the Boston patriots were ridiculed throughout the colonies for failing to oppose the landing of the troops. New Yorkers joked about their "ridiculous Puff and Bombast." General Gage wrote in a letter, "They are a People, who have ever been very bold in Council, but never remarkable for their Feats in Action." [23] English politicians concluded that the patriots were fond of making empty threats, and should not be taken seriously. [24]

The presence of the soldiers increased tensions in Boston, as recorded in the anonymously penned Journal of Occurrences , which chronicled the occupation. The journal was influential in uniting the colonies, and Boston received much-needed support from other colonies when the Boston Port Bill was passed in 1774. [18]

Participating towns

The following towns sent delegates to the convention. [11] A slash (/) indicates that a single delegate represented two or more towns. All of the delegates were men, as was customary at the time, and almost certainly all were white, but not necessarily landowners; Governor Bernard wrote later that there were "very few Gentlemen there." [25]

The convention proceedings indicate that 96 towns were represented; if that number is accurate, this list is incomplete. [11] Please note that the names and boundaries of some towns and counties have changed since 1768. Some are now part of Maine.

CountyTowns
Barnstable Falmouth, Wellfleet
Berkshire None
Bristol Berkley, Dartmouth, Dighton, Norton, Raynham, Rehoboth, Swansey
Cumberland Brunswick, Falmouth/Cape Elizabeth, Gorham, North Yarmouth, Scarborough
Dukes None
Essex Andover, Beverly, Boxford, Bradford, Danvers, Gloucester, Ipswich, Lynn, Newbury, Newburyport, Rowley, Salisbury, Topsfield, Wenham
Hampshire Brimfield, Colrain, Montague
Lincoln None
Middlesex Acton, Ashby, Billerica, Charlestown, Chelmsford, Concord, Holliston, Hopkinton, Lexington, Littleton, Malden, Marlborough, Medford, Newton, Reading, Sherborne, Stow, Townshend, Watertown, Westford, Wilmington
Nantucket None
Plymouth Abington, Duxbury, Halifax, Hanover, Kingston, Middleborough, Pembroke, Plymouth, Rochester, Wareham
Suffolk Boston, Braintree, Brookline, Chelsea, Dorchester, Hingham, Milton, Roxbury, Stoughton, Walpole, Weymouth, Wrentham
Worcester Bolton, Grafton, Harvard, Lancaster, Leicester/Spencer/Paxton, Leominster, Lunenburg/Fitchburg, New Braintree, Northborough, Shrewsbury, Sutton, Westboro, Westminster
York Berwick, Pepperellboro

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Hancock</span> American Patriot and statesman during the American Revolution (1737–1793)

John Hancock was an American Founding Father, merchant, statesman, and prominent Patriot of the American Revolution. He served as president of the Second Continental Congress and was the first and third Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. He is remembered for his large and stylish signature on the United States Declaration of Independence, so much so that the term John Hancock or Hancock has become a nickname in the United States for one's signature. He also signed the Articles of Confederation, and used his influence to ensure that Massachusetts ratified the United States Constitution in 1788.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boston Massacre</span> Confrontation that occurred on March 5, 1770

The Boston Massacre was a confrontation in Boston on March 5, 1770, in which a group of nine British soldiers shot five people out of a crowd of three or four hundred who were harassing them verbally and throwing various projectiles. The event was heavily publicized as "a massacre" by leading Patriots such as Paul Revere and Samuel Adams. British troops had been stationed in the Province of Massachusetts Bay since 1768 in order to support crown-appointed officials and to enforce unpopular Parliamentary legislation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Hutchinson (governor)</span> American colonial official (1711–1780)

Thomas Hutchinson was a businessman, historian, and a prominent Loyalist politician of the Province of Massachusetts Bay in the years before the American Revolution. He has been referred to as "the most important figure on the loyalist side in pre-Revolutionary Massachusetts". He was a successful merchant and politician, and was active at high levels of the Massachusetts government for many years, serving as lieutenant governor and then governor from 1758 to 1774. He was a politically polarizing figure who came to be identified by John Adams and Samuel Adams as a proponent of hated British taxes, despite his initial opposition to Parliamentary tax laws directed at the colonies. He was blamed by Lord North for being a significant contributor to the tensions that led to the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sir Francis Bernard, 1st Baronet</span> British colonial administrator

Sir Francis Bernard, 1st Baronet was a British colonial administrator who served as governor of the provinces of New Jersey and Massachusetts Bay. His uncompromising policies and harsh tactics in Massachusetts angered the colonists and were instrumental in the building of broad-based opposition within the province to the rule of Parliament in the events leading to the American Revolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Bowdoin</span> American politician (1726–1790)

James Bowdoin II was an American political and intellectual leader from Boston, Massachusetts, during the American Revolution and the following decade. He initially gained fame and influence as a wealthy merchant. He served in both branches of the Massachusetts General Court from the 1750s to the 1770s. Although he was initially supportive of the royal governors, he opposed British colonial policy and eventually became an influential advocate of independence. He authored a highly political report on the 1770 Boston Massacre that has been described by historian Francis Walett as one of the most influential pieces of writing that shaped public opinion in the colonies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Province of Massachusetts Bay</span> British colony in North America from 1691 to 1776

The Province of Massachusetts Bay was a colony in British America which became one of the thirteen original states of the United States. It was chartered on October 7, 1691, by William III and Mary II, the joint monarchs of the kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland. The charter took effect on May 14, 1692, and included the Massachusetts Bay Colony, the Plymouth Colony, the Province of Maine, Martha's Vineyard, Nantucket, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick; the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is the direct successor. Maine has been a separate state since 1820, and Nova Scotia and New Brunswick are now Canadian provinces, having been part of the colony only until 1697.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Townshend Acts</span> Political precursor to the American Revolution

The Townshend Acts or Townshend Duties, were a series of British acts of Parliament passed during 1767 and 1768 introducing a series of taxes and regulations to fund administration of the British colonies in America. They are named after the Chancellor of the Exchequer who proposed the program. Historians vary slightly as to which acts they include under the heading "Townshend Acts", but five are often listed:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Cushing</span> First Massachusetts Lieutenant Governor, briefly acting governor

Thomas Cushing III was an American lawyer, merchant, and statesman from Boston, Massachusetts. Active in Boston politics, he represented the city in the provincial assembly from 1761 to its dissolution in 1774, serving as the lower house's speaker for most of those years. Because of his role as speaker, his signature was affixed to many documents protesting British policies, leading officials in London to consider him a dangerous radical. He engaged in extended communications with Benjamin Franklin who at times lobbied on behalf of the legislature's interests in London, seeking ways to reduce the rising tensions of the American Revolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stamp Act Congress</span> American colonial meeting against the British Stamp Act

The Stamp Act Congress, also known as the Continental Congress of 1765, was a meeting held in New York, New York, consisting of representatives from some of the British colonies in North America. It was the first gathering of elected representatives from several of the American colonies to devise a unified protest against new British taxation. Parliament had passed the Stamp Act, which required the use of specialty stamped paper for legal documents, playing cards, calendars, newspapers, and dice for virtually all business in the colonies starting on November 1, 1765.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Faneuil Hall</span> United States historic place in Boston, MA (opened 1743)

Faneuil Hall is a marketplace and meeting hall located near the waterfront and today's Government Center, in Boston, Massachusetts. Opened in 1742, it was the site of several speeches by Samuel Adams, James Otis, and others encouraging independence from Great Britain. It is now part of Boston National Historical Park and a well-known stop on the Freedom Trail. It is sometimes referred to as "the Cradle of Liberty", though the building and location have ties to slavery.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Committees of correspondence</span> 18th-century American political organizations

The committees of correspondence were, prior to the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War, a collection of American political organizations that sought to coordinate opposition to British Parliament and, later, support for American independence. The brainchild of Samuel Adams, a Patriot from Boston, the committees sought to establish, through the writing of letters, an underground network of communication among Patriot leaders in the Thirteen Colonies. The committees were instrumental in setting up the First Continental Congress, which met in Philadelphia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Massachusetts Circular Letter</span>

The Massachusetts Circular Letter was a statement written by Samuel Adams and James Otis Jr., and passed by the Massachusetts House of Representatives in February 1768 in response to the Townshend Acts. Reactions to the letter brought heightened tensions between the British Parliament and Massachusetts, and resulted in the military occupation of Boston by the British Army, which contributed to the coming of the American Revolution.

<i>Boston Gazette</i> Newspaper (1719–1798)

The Boston Gazette (1719–1798) was a newspaper published in Boston, in the British North American colonies. It was a weekly newspaper established by William Brooker, who was just appointed Postmaster of Boston, with its first issue released on December 21, 1719. The Boston Gazette is widely considered the most influential newspaper in early American history, especially in the years leading up to and into the American Revolution. In 1741 the Boston Gazette incorporated the New-England Weekly Journal, founded by Samuel Kneeland, and became the Boston-Gazette, or New-England Weekly Journal. Contributors included: Samuel Adams, Paul Revere, Phyllis Wheatley.

The Journal of Occurrences, also known as Journal of the Times and Journal of Transactions in Boston, was a series of newspaper articles published from 1768 to 1769 in the New York Journal and Packet and other newspapers, chronicling the occupation of Boston by the British Army. Authorship of the articles was anonymous, but is usually attributed to Samuel Adams, then the clerk of the Massachusetts House of Representatives. William Cooper, Boston's town clerk, has also been named as a possible author. The articles may have been written by a group of people working in collaboration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hutchinson Letters affair</span> 1773 publication that increased tension between Massachusetts and the British

The Hutchinson Letters affair was an incident that increased tensions between the colonists of the Province of Massachusetts Bay and the British government prior to the American Revolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Samuel Adams</span> American statesman, political philosopher, governor of Massachusetts, and Founding Father

Samuel Adams was an American statesman, political philosopher, and a Founding Father of the United States. He was a politician in colonial Massachusetts, a leader of the movement that became the American Revolution, and one of the architects of the principles of American republicanism that shaped the political culture of the United States. He was a second cousin to his fellow Founding Father, President John Adams.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Massachusetts Provincial Congress</span> Provisional government of Massachusetts

The Massachusetts Provincial Congress (1774–1780) was a provisional government created in the Province of Massachusetts Bay early in the American Revolution. Based on the terms of the colonial charter, it exercised de facto control over the rebellious portions of the province, and after the British withdrawal from Boston in March 1776, the entire province. When Massachusetts Bay declared its independence in 1776, the Congress continued to govern under this arrangement for several years. Increasing calls for constitutional change led to a failed proposal for a constitution produced by the Congress in 1778, and then a successful constitutional convention that produced a constitution for the state in 1780. The Provincial Congress came to an end with elections in October 1780.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Otis Jr.</span> 18th-century colonial American lawyer and political activist

James Otis Jr. was an American lawyer, political activist, colonial legislator, and early supporter of patriotic causes in Massachusetts at the beginning of the Revolutionary Era. Otis was a fervent opponent of the writs of assistance imposed by Great Britain on the American colonies in the early 1760s that allowed law enforcement officials to search property without cause. He later expanded his criticism of British authority to include tax measures that were being enacted by Parliament. As a result, Otis is often incorrectly credited with coining the slogan "taxation without representation is tyranny".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Merchants Row (Boston)</span>

Merchants Row in Boston, Massachusetts is a short street extending from State Street to Faneuil Hall Square in the Financial District. Since the 17th century it has been a place of commercial activity. It sits close to Long Wharf and Dock Square, hubs of shipping and trade through the 19th century. Portions of the street were formerly known as Swing-Bridge Lane, Fish Lane, and Roebuck Passage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ezekiel Goldthwait</span> American politician

Ezekiel Goldthwait (1710–1782) was a wealthy businessman and landowner in colonial Boston, Massachusetts. He was one of the foremost citizens and prominent in the town's affairs in the years leading up to the American Revolution.

References

Citations

  1. Wood 2002, p. 42.
  2. Miller 1934, p. 448.
  3. 1 2 Miller 1934, pp. 452–453.
  4. Miller 1934, pp. 450.
  5. 1 2 Miller 1934, pp. 454–455.
  6. Miller 1934, pp. 456–457.
  7. Boston Town Meeting 1768.
  8. Miller 1934, p. 458.
  9. Hutchinson 1828, p. 205.
  10. Miller 1934, pp. 459–460.
  11. 1 2 3 Brown 1969, pp. 103–104.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Miller 1934, pp. 464–465.
  13. Brown 1969, p. 95.
  14. Brown 1969, p. 99.
  15. Adams 1768, p. 242.
  16. Adams 1768, p. 243.
  17. Brown 1969, p. 102.
  18. 1 2 Miller 1934, p. 473.
  19. Miller 1934, p. 469.
  20. Smith 1853, pp. 389–390.
  21. 1 2 Miller 1934, p. 467.
  22. Elwyn 1856, p. 106.
  23. Miller 1934, p. 468.
  24. Miller 1934, p. 470.
  25. Miller 1934, p. 455.

Bibliography