Mesopotamian campaigns of Ardashir I

Last updated
Mesopotamian campaigns of Ardashir I
Part of the Roman-Sassanid wars (224-363)
Naqsh i Rustam. Investiture d'Ardashir 1.jpg
Ardashir I is crowned ruler by the god Ahura Mazdā in a relief at Naqsh-i-Rustam.
Date229 - 241
Location
Armenia and Mesopotamia
Result Sassanid and Roman victories
Belligerents
Sassanids Roman Empire
Commanders and leaders
Ardashir I Severus Alexander
Strength
100,000 soldiers along the eastern limes

The Mesopotamian campaigns of Ardashir I represented the first episode in a new period of wars between the Romans and Sasanids. The war between the Roman Empire, ruled by the Roman emperor Severus Alexander (222-235), and the Sasanian rule, led by Ardashir I [1] (224 [2] -241), lasted for more than a decade, from 229 to 241 when the Sasanian ruler died and was replaced by his son, Shapur I.

Contents

Historical context

Between 224 and 226/227, an important episode changed the fate of relations between the Roman and Persian empires: in the East, the last Parthian ruler, Artabanus IV, was overthrown after being defeated in "three battles," [3] and the insurgent, Ardashir I, founded the Sasanian dynasty, [4] destined to be the eastern adversary of the Romans until the 7th century. [5] [6] Specifically, beginning in 229/230, Sasanids and Romans clashed for the first time.

Ardashir I was the first Persian king who had the courage to launch an attack against the Parthian kingdom and the first to succeed in regaining the empire for the Persians.

—  Herodian, History of the Empire after Marcus Aurelius, VI, 2.6.

On the Roman front, the new Severan dynasty that reigned over the Roman Empire between the end of the second and the first decades of the third century (from 193 to 235, with a brief interruption during the reign of Macrinus between 217 and 218), and which had had in Septimius Severus its progenitor, was now in the hands of a young emperor, Severus Alexander, who a few years later was killed, revealing himself to be the last descendant. The new dynasty had arisen on the ashes of a long period of civil wars, where three other contenders besides Septimius Severus (Didius Julianus, Pescennius Niger, and Clodius Albinus) had faced each other.

Casus belli

The casus belli was the claim by the Sasanids, who considered themselves descendants of the Persians, to possession of the entire Achaemenid Empire,including the territories, now Roman, of Asia Minor and the Near East as far as the Aegean Sea. [7] [8]

[Ardashir] Believing that the entire continent in front of Europe, separated by the Aegean Sea and the Sea of Marmara, and the region called Asia belonged to him by divine right, he intended to reclaim it for the Persian Empire. He declared that all the countries in the area, between Ionia and Caria, had been ruled by Persian satraps, starting from Cyrus the Great, who first transferred the kingdom from Media to the Persians, to Darius III, the last of the Persian rulers, whose kingdom was destroyed by Alexander the Great. So in his opinion it was right to restore and reunite for the Persians, the kingdom they had previously possessed.

—  Herodian, History of the Empire after Marcus Aurelius, VI, 2.2.

Forces in the field

Sasanids

It is not known precisely how many and what armies were fielded by the Sasanids. Cassius Dio recounts that it was certainly a large army, ready to terrorize not only the Roman province of Mesopotamia but also that of Syria, west of the Euphrates. [7]

What is known of this army is that it was not permanent like the Roman army, with professional soldiers paid regularly for their trade. There was only an eventual division of the final spoils. [9] Rather, the system was similar to the feudal one, where for each campaign it was necessary to assemble an army from time to time, composed of nobles at the head of their "clans," subjected then under the command of a prince of the royal house. Thus, there were no experienced weapons officers serving continuously, nor was there a lasting system of recruitment, as there were no permanent military units, although there were many nobles at the disposal of the Sasanian army. For these reasons, they often hired mercenary armies. [9] They mainly used the bow and horse in warfare, unlike the Romans who favored infantry, so much so that the Sasanians are said to have grown up from childhood, riding and shooting with arrows, constantly living for war and hunting. [10]

However, unlike the Arsacid Parthians, they tried to keep their contingents under arms for more years during major military campaigns, speeding up the recruitment of their armies, as well as better assimilating the siege techniques of their Roman opponents, which they never really learned from their predecessors. [11]

Romans

It is known that for the Romans, the forces put in charge were represented by the legions and auxiliary troops stationed along the eastern limes, which, according to Cassius Dio, were not in an acceptable state of preparedness, discipline and morale to cope with this new eastern danger. [7] Below is a list of the legions and their respective fortresses (to which one might later add the IV Italica, formed around 231 by Severus Alexander):

No. of legionary fortresses of the eastern limesLegionary unitAncient locationModern locationRoman province
1
 Legio XV Apollinaris Satala Sadagh Cappadocia
2
 Legio XII Fulminata Melitene Melitene Cappadocia
3
 Legio III Parthica [12] Nisibis [12] Nusaybin [12] Mesopotamia [12]
4
 Legio I Parthica [12] Singara [12] Sinjar [12] Mesopotamia and Osroene [12]
5
 Legio IV Scythica Zeugma Belkis Syria Coele
6
 Legio XVI Flavia Firma Sura Sura Syria Coele
7
 vexill . Legio II Parthica Apamea Syria Coele
8
 Legio III Gallica Danaba Mehin Syria Phoenicia
9
 Legio X Fretensis Aelia Capitolina Jerusalem Syria Palaestina
10
 Legio VI Ferrata CaparcotnaKfar Otnay Syria Palaestina
11
 Legio III Cyrenaica Bostra Bosra Arabia Petraea

Stages of the conflict

First phase: Sasanian advance in Mesopotamia (229-231)

229 ca.

With the rise of the first Sasanian ruler, Ardashir I, the Persian armies returned to unsuccessfully besiege the city of Hatra (to make it a base of attack against the Romans [1] ), which is not known whether it was under direct Roman control, or simply a "client" city of the Roman Empire. [2] [13] [14] The failure of this siege forced the Sasanian ruler to go first to Media, [1] where he succeeded in subduing its territories, and then to Armenia, where he was, however, repulsed by a son of the old Parthian ruler, Artabanus IV. [15] [16] [17]

230

In the course of this year, the Sasanian armies advanced into Roman Mesopotamia laying siege to many Roman garrisons along the Euphrates, [18] also attempting, unsuccessfully, to conquer Nisibis (an important center of trade with the East and China), and perhaps invading the Roman provinces of Syria and Cappadocia, [16] [19] although there is insufficient archaeological evidence, at least in the present state of knowledge, to say that the raids also affected territories west of the Euphrates. [13]

Unexpected dispatches from the governors of Syria and Mesopotamia revealed that Artaxerxes the Persian ruler, had conquered the Parthian kingdom and occupied all its eastern part, killing their king Artabanus IV, and was now called the "Great King" and wore the double diadem. Artaxerxes then subdued all his neighboring barbarians and forced them to pay tax. He did not remain inactive, staying on his side of the Tigris river: in fact, he decided to cross over the riverbanks and cross the borders of the Roman Empire, invading Mesopotamia and posing a threat to Syria.

—  Herodian, History of the Empire after Marcus Aurelius, VI, 2.1.

In addition, some detachments of the Roman army (Legio I Parthica and Cohors IX Maurorum [Gordiana]) were left at Hatra. [20] [21]

231

Emperor Severus Alexander then organized a new military expedition against the Sasanians, enlisting a new legion in Italy, Legio IIII Italica. [2] Herodian reports the speech Alexander made in front of the deployed troops and tells how the soldiers were encouraged by the emperor's words. After distributing money to the troops, he went to the Senate to make a similar speech and make his intentions public. On the day of his departure (perhaps in the spring [2] of that year), after attending the ritual sacrifices, Alexander left Rome (231), [22] to reach Antioch, his headquarters. [2]

Second phase: Roman reaction (232)

Severus Alexander: tetradrachm [23]
Severus Alexander Tetradrachm 234 816871.jpg
... MAP AVP ALEXAND POC... , laureate head right, wearing breastplate;L IΔ, Trophy with two prisoners at the base on the right and left; a palm tree on the left.
Minted in 234.

232

Once Alexander reached Antioch, he made a further attempt at mediation, offering peace and friendship to Ardashir, but the latter not only sent back the Roman envoys empty-handed, but also sent four hundred of his soldiers of imposing appearance and richly clothed to the Roman emperor with a renewed invitation to leave the Roman lands as far as the Bosporus. Alexander arrested the four hundred Sasanian envoys and sent them to cultivate lands in Phrygia, but did not put them to death.

The campaign began with a strategic plan to divide the Roman army into three different marching columns. Alexander chose the central one for himself, while the first was to advance northward and subdue Armenia and Media, and the third, was to descend the Euphrates River, joining with that of Alexander Severus near Ctesiphon. [2] His indecision in advancing and the poor level of preparedness of the eastern Roman troops meant that the southern contingent was opposed by almost the entire Sasanian army, which defeated the Romans by inflicting heavy losses. Herodian relates that the cause of Alexander's indecision was his fear of putting his own life on the line or the "feminine fears" of his mother Julia Mamaea, who had followed him to the East. News of the defeat reached the emperor while he was ill, causing him to despair about the final outcome of the campaign. The soldiers themselves, undermined by illnesses caused by the unhealthy environment and the scarcity of provisions, accused the emperor of having caused the destruction of the army because of his lack of military ability, so much so that there was an attempt at usurpation, immediately foiled, by a certain Uranius. Alexander then ordered the two surviving groups of troops to winter in Antioch, and on the way back it seems that the Roman losses were considerable: the army from the north was practically decimated by the frigid temperatures in the mountains of Armenia, the southern one by the defeat suffered along the Euphrates because of an unequal number of Sasanian forces against which it had clashed. [24]

However, the campaign proved not entirely bad for the Romans, as the territories lost in Mesopotamia in the course of the Sasanian advance of 229-230 were recaptured and the Sasanids remained quiet until 239-240, while Alexander was able to boast the victorious titles of Parthicus maximus and Persicus . [25] [26]

Third phase: new Sasanian invasions into Roman Mesopotamia after the death of Severus Alexander (237-241)

The city of Hatra (some of its ruins are pictured), an ally of the Romans, fell after a long siege by Sasanian armies in 240. Hatra (17).jpg
The city of Hatra (some of its ruins are pictured), an ally of the Romans, fell after a long siege by Sasanian armies in 240.

237-238 [27]

During the reign of Maximinus the Thracian, who succeeded the last emperor of the Severan dynasty, Alexander, the cities of the Roman province of Mesopotamia, Nisibis and Carrhae, were besieged and occupied by the Sasanids. [27] [28] [29] Not surprisingly, Herodian also suggests that the Sasanids remained quiet for three or four years after Alexander Severus' campaigns of 232, the final outcome of which was highly uncertain for the two sides. [30]

238/239 [31]

A new large-scale invasion by the Sasanian armies occurred later that year, which laid siege to the fortress-city of Dura Europos, a Roman outpost on the Euphrates River. [32] [33] [34] [35]

240

In the course of that year, it appears that Ardashir I finally succeeded in the feat of occupying and destroying the important Roman-allied city-stronghold of Hatra, [21] [27] [35] [36] then occupying much of Roman Mesopotamia (including the legionary fortresses of Rhesaina and Singara as well as the auxiliary fort of Zagurae, today's Ain Sinu [37] ), perhaps even going so far as to besiege and occupy Antioch itself, [38] as seems to be suggested by the fact that its mint stopped minting coinage for the years 240 and 241. [35]

Consequences

The death of the young emperor at the hands of one of his generals, Maximinus the Thracian (in 235), and the subsequent military anarchy into which the Roman Empire poured for about fifty years, determined considerable advantages in favor of the nascent Sasanian Empire, which did not miss the opportunity for surprising revenge, even going so far as to occupy Antioch itself in 252 and 260.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Severus Alexander</span> Roman emperor from 222 to 235

Marcus Aurelius Severus Alexander, also known as Alexander Severus, was a Roman emperor, who reigned from 222 until 235. He was the last emperor from the Severan dynasty. He succeeded his slain cousin Elagabalus in 222. Alexander himself was eventually assassinated, and his death marked the beginning of the events of the Crisis of the Third Century, which included nearly fifty years of civil war, foreign invasion, and the collapse of the monetary economy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Septimius Severus</span> Roman emperor from 193 to 211

Lucius Septimius Severus Pertinax was a Roman politician who served as emperor from 193 to 211. He was born in Leptis Magna in the Roman province of Africa. His father was Carthaginian; his mother of Roman descent. As a young man he advanced through the customary succession of offices under the reigns of Marcus Aurelius and Commodus. Severus seized power after the death of the emperor Pertinax in 193 during the Year of the Five Emperors.

Year 195 (CXCV) was a common year starting on Wednesday of the Julian calendar. At the time, it was known as the Year of the Consulship of Scrapula and Clemens. The denomination 195 for this year has been used since the early medieval period, when the Anno Domini calendar era became the prevalent method in Europe for naming years.

The 220s decade ran from January 1, 220, to December 31, 229.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shapur I</span> Ruler of the Sasanian Empire from c. 240 to c. 270

Shapur I was the second Sasanian King of Kings of Iran. The precise dating of his reign is disputed, but it is generally agreed that he ruled from 240 to 270, with his father Ardashir I as co-regent until the death of the latter in 242. During his co-regency, he helped his father with the conquest and destruction of the Arab city of Hatra, whose fall was facilitated, according to Islamic tradition, by the actions of his future wife al-Nadirah. Shapur also consolidated and expanded the empire of Ardashir I, waged war against the Roman Empire, and seized its cities of Nisibis and Carrhae while he was advancing as far as Roman Syria. Although he was defeated at the Battle of Resaena in 243 by Roman emperor Gordian III, he was the following year able to win the Battle of Misiche and force the new Roman emperor Philip the Arab to sign a favorable peace treaty that was regarded by the Romans as "a most shameful treaty".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Julia Avita Mamaea</span> Mother of Roman emperor Alexander Severus (died 235)

Julia Avita Mamaea or Julia Mamaea was a Christian Syrian noble woman and member of the Severan dynasty. She was the mother of Roman emperor Alexander Severus and remained one of his chief advisors throughout his reign. She was killed in 235 by rebel soldiers alongside her son.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tiberius Claudius Pompeianus</span> Roman politician and general (c. 125 – 193 AD)

Tiberius Claudius Pompeianus was a politician and military commander during the 2nd century in the Roman Empire. A general under Emperor Marcus Aurelius, Pompeianus distinguished himself during Rome's wars against the Parthians and the Marcomanni. He was a member of the imperial family due to his marriage to Lucilla, a daughter of Marcus Aurelius, and was a key figure during the emperor's reign. Pompeianus was offered the imperial throne three times, though he refused to claim the title for himself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ardashir I</span> Founder of the Sassanid Empire (180–242)

Ardashir I, also known as Ardashir the Unifier, was the founder of the Persian Sasanian Empire. He was also Ardashir V of the Kings of Persis, until he founded the new empire. After defeating the last Parthian shahanshah Artabanus IV on the Hormozdgan plain in 224, he overthrew the Parthian dynasty and established the Sasanian dynasty. Afterwards, Ardashir called himself "shahanshah" and began conquering the land that he called Iran.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vologases V</span> King of the Parthian Empire from 191 to 208

Vologases V was King of Kings of the Parthian Empire from 191 to 208. As king of Armenia, he is known as Vologases II. Not much is known about his period of kingship of Armenia, except that he put his son Rev I on the Iberian throne in 189. Vologases succeeded his father Vologases IV as king of the Parthian Empire in 191; it is uncertain if the transition of power was peaceful or if Vologases took the throne in a civil war. When Vologases acceded the Parthian throne, he passed the Armenian throne to his son Khosrov I.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman–Iranian relations</span> Historical relationship between the Roman and Iranian empires

Relations between the Roman and Iranian states were established c. 92 BC. It was in 69 BC that the two states clashed for the first time; the political rivalry between the two empires would dominate much of Western Asia and Europe until 628. Initially commencing as a rivalry between the Parthians and Rome, from the 3rd to mid-7th centuries the Roman Empire and its rival Sassanid Persia were recognized as two of the leading powers in the world.

The Roman–Persian Wars, also known as the Roman–Iranian Wars, were a series of conflicts between states of the Greco-Roman world and two successive Iranian empires: the Parthian and the Sasanian. Battles between the Parthian Empire and the Roman Republic began in 54 BC; wars began under the late Republic, and continued through the Roman and Sasanian empires. A plethora of vassal kingdoms and allied nomadic nations in the form of buffer states and proxies also played a role. The wars were ended by the early Muslim conquests, which led to the fall of the Sasanian Empire and huge territorial losses for the Byzantine Empire, shortly after the end of the last war between them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parthian Empire</span> Iranian empire (247 BC–224 AD)

The Parthian Empire, also known as the Arsacid Empire, was a major Iranian political and cultural power in ancient Iran from 247 BC to 224 AD. Its latter name comes from its founder, Arsaces I, who led the Parni tribe in conquering the region of Parthia in Iran's northeast, then a satrapy (province) under Andragoras, who was rebelling against the Seleucid Empire. Mithridates I greatly expanded the empire by seizing Media and Mesopotamia from the Seleucids. At its height, the Parthian Empire stretched from the northern reaches of the Euphrates, in what is now central-eastern Turkey, to present-day Afghanistan and western Pakistan. The empire, located on the Silk Road trade route between the Roman Empire in the Mediterranean Basin and the Han dynasty of China, became a center of trade and commerce.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Artavasdes IV</span> King of Armenia

Artavasdes IV of Armenia; also known as Artavasdes II of Atropatene; Artavasdes II of Media Atropatene and Armenia Major; Artavasdes II, and Artavasdes was an Iranian prince who served as King of Media Atropatene. During his reign of Media Atropatene, Artavasdes also served as a Roman Client King of Armenia Major.

The Battle of Nisibis was fought in the summer of 217 between the armies of the Roman Empire under the newly ascended emperor Macrinus and the Parthian army of King Artabanus IV. It lasted for three days, and ended with a bloody Parthian victory, with both sides suffering large casualties. As a result of the battle, Macrinus was forced to seek peace, paying the Parthians a huge sum and abandoning the invasion of Mesopotamia that Caracalla had begun a year before.

The Roman–Parthian Wars were a series of conflicts between the Parthian Empire and the Roman Republic and Roman Empire. It was the first series of conflicts in what would be 682 years of Roman–Persian Wars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kingdom of Hatra</span> 2nd-century Aramaic kingdom

The Kingdom of Hatra was a 2nd-century Aramaic speaking kingdom ruled by an Arab dynasty located between the Roman Empire and the Parthian Empire, mostly under Parthian suzerainty, in modern-day northern Iraq.

Romans in Persia is related to the brief invasion and occupation of western and central areas of Parthia by the Romans during their empire. Emperor Trajan was even temporarily able to nominate a king of western parts of Parthia, Parthamaspates, as ruler of a Roman "client state" in Parthia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fall of Hatra</span> Capture of Hatra by Sasanians (240-241)

The fall of Hatra, capital of the Kingdom of Hatra under Sanatruq II, took place in the 3rd century after a lengthy siege by the Sasanian king Shapur I. Hatra was plundered and abandoned, and its kingdom dissolved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sassanid campaign of Severus Alexander</span> Campaign of Severus Alexander against the Sasanian Empire

The Sassanid campaign of Alexander Severus was an episode of the Roman–Sasanian Wars (224-363) that saw the Roman Empire ruled by Emperor Alexander Severus (222-235) confront the dominance of the Sasanids, led by Ardashir I (224-241): the war was fought between 230 and 232, originating from an attempted Sasanian expansion into the eastern Roman provinces, and resolved with a return to the status quo ante.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege warfare in ancient Rome</span> Sieges in Roman History

Siege in ancient Rome was one of the techniques used by the Roman army to achieve ultimate victory, although pitched battles were considered the only true form of warfare. Nevertheless, the importance that siege action could have in the warfare framework of that era cannot be underestimated. Hannibal was unable to defeat the might of Rome because, although he had defeated the Roman armies in the open field, he had proved unable to assault the city of Rome. As time went on, the armies of the late Roman and Imperial Republics also became particularly adept at siege warfare: Gaius Julius Caesar's conquest of Gaul was the combination of a whole series of pitched battles and long sieges, culminating in that of Alesia in 52 BCE. To seize the main center of an enemy people seemed to be the best way to bring a conflict to an end, as also happened in the time of Trajan, during the conquest of Dacia, when the enemy capital, Sarmizegetusa Regia, was besieged and occupied. For this purpose, numerous works and siege machines were, therefore, required for variety and functionality, engaging soldiers in the execution of important military engineering works.

Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo used to say that the enemy was won with the hoe, that is, with construction works.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Cassius Dio, Roman History, LXXX, 3.1-2
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Pat Southern, The Roman Empire: from Severus to Constantine, p. 61.
  3. ↑ Cassius Dio, Roman History, LXXX, 3.1-2.
  4. ↑ Agathangelos, History of the Armenians, I, 3-9; Agathias, History of Justinian's reign, IV, 24.1.
  5. ↑ Herodian, History of the empire after Marcus Aurelius, VI, 2.1.
  6. ↑ Zosimus, New History, I, 18.1.
  7. 1 2 3 Cassius Dio, Roman History, LXXX, 4.1
  8. ↑ Herodian, History of the empire after Marcus Aurelius, VI, 2.2.
  9. 1 2 Herodian, History of the Empire after Marcus Aurelius, VI, 5.3.
  10. ↑ Herodian, History of the Empire after Marcus Aurelius, VI, 5.4.
  11. ↑ Pat Southern, The Roman Empire: from Severus to Constantine, pp. 231-232.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 F.Millar, The Roman near East (31 BC - AD 337), Cambridge Massachusetts & London 1993, p.128.
  13. 1 2 F.Millar, The Roman near East (31 BC - AD 337), Cambridge Massachusetts & London 1993, p.149.
  14. ↑ F.Vattioni, Le iscrizioni di Hatra, 1981; H.J.W. Drijvers, Hatra, Palmyra and Edessa, in Aufstieg Niedergang Römischen Welt, II.8 (1977), p.799.
  15. ↑ Cassius Dio, Roman History, LXXX, 3.3
  16. 1 2 Zonaras, Extracts of History, XII, 15.
  17. ↑ Agathangelos, History of the Armenians, I, 18-23.
  18. ↑ Herodian, History of the Empire after Marcus Aurelius , VI, 2.3-5.
  19. ↑ Giorgio Sincello, Selezione di cronografia, 437, 15-25 (pp.673, 17-674).
  20. ↑ A.Maricq, Les dernières années d'Hatra: l'alliance romaine, in Syria 34 (1957), p.288; AE 1958, 238 databile al 5 giugno del 235; AE 1958, 239; AE 1958, 240.
  21. 1 2 F.Millar, The Roman near East (31 BC - AD 337), Cambridge Massachusetts & London 1993, p.129.
  22. ↑ Herodian, History of the Empire after Marcus Aurelius , VI, 3.1-7, 4.1-2.
  23. ↑ Köln 2494; Dattari 4405; cf. Milne 3184 ; Emmett 3138.14.
  24. ↑ Herodian, History of the Empire after Marcus Aurelius , VI.4.4-7, 5, 6.1-3.
  25. ↑ Historia Augusta, Alexander Severus, 56.9; BCTH-1902-517.
  26. ↑ Pat Southern, The Roman Empire: from Severus to Constantine, p. 62.
  27. 1 2 3 J.-M.Carriè, Eserciti e strategie, La Roma tardo-antica, per una preistoria dell'idea di Europa, vol.18, Milano 2008, p.94
  28. ↑ Zonaras, Extracts of History, XII, 18.
  29. ↑ Giorgio Sincello, Selezione di cronografia, 681.
  30. ↑ Herodian, History of the Empire after Marcus Aurelius, VI, 6.6.
  31. ↑ Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum 7, Berlin 1934, 743b (da Dura Europos): Il tredicesimo giorno del mese di Xandikus dell'anno 550 [20 aprile del 239] i Persiani scesero verso di noi.
  32. ↑ Historia Augusta, Maximus and Balbinus, 13.5; AE 1948, 124.
  33. ↑ F.Millar, The Roman near East (31 BC - AD 337), Cambridge Massachusetts & London 1993, p.150.
  34. ↑ X.Loriot, Les premières années de la grande crise du III siecle: de l'avènement de Maximin Thrace (235) à la mort de Gordian III (244), Aufstieg Niedergang Römischen Welt, II.2 (1975), p.657.
  35. 1 2 3 Pat Southern, The Roman Empire: from Severus to Constantine, p. 70.
  36. ↑ Codex Manichaicus Coloniensis, 18, 1-16.
  37. ↑ X.Loriot, Les premières années de la grande crise du III siecle: de l'avènement de Maximin Thrace (235) à la mort de Gordian III (244), Aufstieg Niedergang Römischen Welt, II.2 (1975), p.763.
  38. ↑ Historia Augusta, Gordiani tres, 26, 5-6.

Bibliography

Ancient sources

Modern historiographical sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.