Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR) is a biological-based technology involving the manipulation of functions or structures within microbial environments present in oil reservoirs. The primary objective of MEOR is to improve the extraction of oil confined within porous media, while boosting economic benefits.[1][2][3][4][5] As a tertiary oil extraction technology, MEOR enables the partial recovery of the commonly residual 2/3 of oil, effectively prolonging the operational lifespan of mature oil reservoirs.[3]
wellbore clean up removes mud and other debris blocking the channels where oil flows through;
well stimulation improves the flow of oil from the drainage area into the well bore; and
enhanced water floods through stimulating microbial activity by injecting selected nutrients and sometimes indigenous microbes.[6][1][2][3][4][5] From the engineering point of view, MEOR is a system integrated by the reservoir, microbes, nutrients and protocol of well injection.[1]
So far, the outcomes of MEOR are explained based on two predominant rationales:
Increment in oil production. This is done by modifying the interfacial properties of the system oil-water-minerals, with the aim of facilitating oil movement through porous media. In such a system, microbial activity affects fluidity (viscosity reduction, miscible flooding); displacement efficiency (decrease of interfacial tension, increase of permeability); sweep efficiency (mobility control, selective plugging) and driving force (reservoir pressure).
Reduce water cut. The indigenous microbes stimulated by the injected microbial nutrients grow fast and selectively block the "thief zones", divert the injected water to sweep the unswept oil.
Several decades of research and successful applications support the claims of MEOR as a mature technology.[1][3][5] Despite those facts, disagreement still exists.[7] Successful stories are specific for each MEOR field application, and published information regarding supportive economical advantages is however nonexistent. Despite this, there is consensus considering MEOR one of the cheapest existing EOR methods.[1][3][5][7] However, obscurity exists on predicting whether or not the deployment of MEOR will be successful. MEOR is, therefore, one of the future research areas with great priority as identified by the "Oil and Gas in the 21st Century Task Force".[7] This is probably because MEOR is a complementary technology that may help recover the 377 billion barrels of oil that are unrecoverable by conventional technologies.[3]
Bias
Before the advent of environmental molecular microbiology, the word "bacteria" was utilised indistinctively in many fields to refer to uncharacterized microbes,[8] and such systematic error affected several disciplines. Therefore, the word "microbe" or "microorganism" will therefore be preferred hereafter in the text.
In Microbial EOR, only the beneficial microbes are stimulated, like Nitrate Reducing Bacteria (NRB). The non-beneficial bacteria like Sulphate Reducing Bacteria (SRB) are not stimulated because the MEOR process only introduces nitrate to the reservoir, but not introduces sulphate to it. In the meantime, the growing NRB can control the activities of SRB, reduce the concentration of H2S. To some extent, MEOR process may recover the reservoir from sour to sweet.
History
It was in 1926 when Beckam proposed the utilisation of microorganisms as agents for recovering the remnant oil entrapped in porous media.[1][2][3][5] Since that time numerous investigations have been developed, and are extensively reviewed.[1][5] In 1947, ZoBell and colleagues set the basis of petroleum microbiology applied to oil recovery, whose contribution would be useful for the first MEOR patent granted to Updegraff and colleagues in 1957 concerning the in situ production of oil recovery agents such as gases, acids, solvents and biosurfactants from microbial degradation of molasses. In 1954, the first field test was carried out in the Lisbon field in Arkansas, USA. During that time, Kuznetsov discovered the microbial gas production from oil. From this year and until the 1970s there was intensive research in USA, USSR, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Poland. The main type of field experiments developed in those countries consisted in injecting exogenous microbes. In 1958, selective plugging with microbial produced biomass was proposed by Heinningen and colleagues. The oil crisis of 1970 triggered a great interest in active MEOR research in more than 15 countries.[1] From 1970 to 2000, basic MEOR research focused on microbial ecology and characterization of oil reservoirs. In 1983, Ivanov and colleagues developed the strata microbial activation technology. By 1990, MEOR achieved an interdisciplinary technology status. In 1995, a survey of MEOR projects (322) in the USA showed that 81% of the projects successfully increased oil production, and there was not a single case of reduced oil production.[1] Today, MEOR is gaining attention owing to its low cost (less than $10 per incremental bbl) and low CAPEX requirement (the operator does not need to invest in surface facilities as traditional chemical or CO2 EOR, and can reduce the number of infill drilling wells).[9] Several countries indicated they might be willing to use MEOR in one third of their oil recovery programs by 2010.[3] In addition, as the Wall Street, shale oil operators, and the US DOE realize the extreme recovery factor of the US shale oil wells (lower than 10%), the US SBIR sponsored the first MEOR pilot of multistage fractured shale oil well in the world in 2018,[10]"Field pilot test of Novel Biological EOR Process for Extracting Trapped Oil from Unconventional Reservoirs", conducted by New Aero Technology LLC.
Injected microbes and nutrients are cheap; (the injection of microbes is out of date. The new microbial EOR technology does not need to inject microbes to the reservoir, but only inject nutrients to stimulate the indigenous microbes[6])
easy to handle in the field and independent of oil prices.
Economically attractive for mature oil fields before abandonment.
Increases oil production.
Existing facilities require slight modifications.
Easy application.
Less expensive set up.
Low energy input requirement for microbes to produce MEOR agents.
More efficient than other EOR methods when applied to carbonate oil reservoirs.
Microbial activity increases with microbial growth. This is opposite to the case of other EOR additives in time and distance.
Microbial growth is favoured when: layer permeability is greater than 20 md; reservoir temperature is inferior to 85 0C, salinity is below 100,000 ppm and reservoir depth is less than 3,500m.
The recent cases proved that there is no corrosion during MEOR based on continuous field monitoring results. In addition, the stimulated indigenous microbes do not affect crude oil qualities, and there is no sign of increasing microbes in the produced liquid.
Environment of an oil reservoir
Oil reservoirs are complex environments containing living (microorganisms) and non living factors (minerals) which interact with each other in a complicated dynamic network of nutrients and energy fluxes. Since the reservoir is heterogeneous, so do the variety of ecosystems containing diverse microbial communities, which in turn are able to affect reservoir behaviour and oil mobilization.[2][3][4][7]
Microbes are living machines whose metabolites, excretion products and new cells may interact with each other or with the environment, positively or negatively, depending on the global desirable purpose, e.g. the enhancement of oil recovery. All these entities, i.e. enzymes, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS)[12][13] and the cells themselves, may participate as catalyst or reactants. Such complexity is increased by the interplay with the environment, the later playing a crucial role by affecting cellular function, i.e. genetic expression and protein production.
Despite this fundamental knowledge on cell physiology, a solid understanding on function and structure of microbial communities in oil reservoirs, i.e. ecophysiology, remains inexistent.
The aim of MEOR is to enhancing oil recovery continuously by making use of the metabolic process of the indigenous beneficial microbes.
Environmental constraints
Several factors concomitantly affect microbial growth and activity.[5] In oil reservoirs, such environmental constraints permit the establishment of criteria to assess and compare the suitability of various microorganisms. Those constraints may not be as harsh as other environments on Earth. For example, with connate brines the salinity is higher than that of sea water but lower than that of salt lakes. In addition, pressures up to 20 MPa and temperatures up to 85°C, in oil reservoirs, are within the limits for the survival of other microorganisms.
Some environmental constraints creating selective pressures on cellular systems that may also affect microbial communities in oil reservoirs are:
Temperature
Enzymes are biological catalysts whose function is affected by a variety of factors including temperature, which, at different ranges, may improve or hamper enzymatic mediated reactions. This will have an effect over the optimal cellular growth or metabolism. Such dependency permits classification of microbes according to the range of temperatures at which they grow. For instance: psychrophiles (<25°C), mesophiles (25–45°C), thermophiles (45–60°C) and hyperthermophiles (60–121°C). Although such cells optimally grow in these temperature ranges there may not be a direct relationship with the production of specific metabolites.
Pressure
Direct effects
The effects of pressure on microbial growth under deep ocean conditions were investigated by ZoBell and Johnson in 1949. They called those microbes whose growth was enhanced by increasing pressure, barophilic. Other classifications of microorganisms are based on whether microbial growth is inhibited at standard conditions (piezophiles) or above 40 MPa (piezotolerants). From a molecular point of view, the review of Daniel[14] shows that at high pressures the DNAdouble helix becomes denser, and therefore both gene expression and protein synthesis are affected.
One study has concluded that substantial bacterial activity is achieved when there are interconnections of pores having at least 0.2μm diameter.[15] It is expected that pore size and geometry may affect chemotaxis. However, this has not been proven at oil reservoir conditions.
pH
The acidity of alkalinity has an impact over several aspects in living and non living systems. For instance:
Surface charge
Changes in cellular surface and membrane thickness may be promoted by pH due to its ionization power of cellular membrane embedded proteins. The modified ionic regions may interact with mineral particles and affect the motion of cells through the porous media.
Enzymatic activity
Embedded cell proteins play a fundamental role in the transport of chemicals across the cellular membrane. Their function is strongly dependent on their state of ionisation, which is in turn strongly affected by pH.
In both cases, this may happen in isolated or complex environmental microbial communities. So far the understanding on the interaction between pH and environmental microbial communities remains unknown, despite the efforts of the last decade. Little is known of the ecophysiology of complex microbial communities, and research is still in developmental stage.[16][17][18]
Oxidation potential
The oxidation potential (Eh, measured in volts) is, as in any reaction system, the thermodynamic driving force of anaerobic respiration, which takes place in oxygen depleted environments. Prokaryotes are among the cells that have anaerobic respiration as metabolic strategy for survival. The electron transport takes place along and across the cellular membrane (prokaryotes lack of mitochondria). Electrons are transferred from an electron donor (molecule to be oxidised anaerobically) to an electron acceptor (NO3, SO4, MnO4, etc.). The net Eh between a given electron donor and acceptor; hydrogen ions and other species in place will determine which reaction will first take place. For instance, nitrification is hierarchically more favoured than sulphate reduction. This allows for enhanced oil recovery by disfavouring biologically produced H2S, which derives from reduced SO4. In this process, the effects of nitrate reduction on wettability, interfacial tension, viscosity, permeability, biomass and biopolymer production remain unknown.
Electrolyte composition
Electrolytes concentration and other dissolved species may affect cellular physiology. Dissolving electrolytes reduces thermodynamic activity (aw), vapour pressure and autoprotolysis of water. Besides, electrolytes promote an ionic strength gradient across cellular membrane and therefore provides a powerful driving force allowing the diffusion of water into or out to cells. In natural environments, most bacteria are incapable of living at aw below 0.95. However, some microbes from hypersaline environment such as Pseudomonas species and Halococcus thrive at lower aw, and are therefore interesting for MEOR research.
Non-specific effects
They may occur on pH and Eh. For example, increasing ionic strength increases solubility of nonelectrolytes ('salting out') as in the case of dissolution of carbon dioxide, a pH controller of a variety of natural waters.
Biological factors
Although it is widely accepted that predation, parasitism, syntrophism and other relationships also occur in the microbial world, little is known in this relationships on MEOR and they have been disregarded in MEOR experiments.
In other cases, some microorganisms can thrive in nutrient deficient environments (oligotrophy) such as deep granitic and basaltic aquifers. Other microbes, living in sediments, may utilise available organic compounds (heterotrophy). Organic matter and metabolic products between geological formations can diffuse and support microbial growth in distant environments.[19]
Mechanism
Understanding MEOR mechanism is still far from being clear. Although a variety of explanations has been given in isolated experiments,[1][2][3][5][7] it is unclear if they were carried out trying to mimic oil reservoirs conditions.
The mechanism can be explained from the client-operator viewpoint which considers a series of concomitant positive or negative effects that will result in a global benefit:
Beneficial effects. Biodegradation of big molecules reduces viscosity; production of surfactants reduces interfacial tension; production of gas provides additional pressure driving force; microbial metabolites or the microbes themselves may reduce permeability by activation of secondary flow paths. The growing nitrate reducing bacteria will compete food with the sulphate reducing bacteria, and generate nitrite to kill the sulphate reducing bacteria, therefore conquer the activities of sulphate reducing bacteria, reduce H2S concentration, mitigate downhole corrosion caused by sulphate reducing bacteria, acid producing bacteria, etc.
Sweep the unswept oil. Permeability reduction can be beneficial due to bioclogging if the MEOR is designed and implemented properly. If it is not designed and deployed properly, microbial metabolites or the microbes themselves may reduce permeability by activation of secondary flow paths by depositing: biomass (biological clogging), minerals (chemical clogging) or other suspended particles (physical clogging). Positively, attachment of bacteria and development of slime, i.e. extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), favour the plugging of highly permeable zones (thieves zones) leading to increased sweep efficiency.
Strategies
Changing oil reservoir ecophysiology to favour MEOR can be achieved by complementing different strategies. In situ microbial stimulation can be chemically promoted by injecting electron acceptors such as nitrate; easy fermentable molasses, vitamins or surfactants. Alternatively, MEOR is promoted by injecting exogenous microbes, which may be adapted to oil reservoir conditions and be capable of producing desired MEOR agents (Table 1).
Table 1. Possible applications of products and MEOR agents produced by microorganism.[3]
MEOR agents
Microbes
Product
Possible MEOR application
Biomass, i.e. flocks or biofilms
Bacillus sp.
Cells and EPS (mainly exopolysaccharides)
Selective plugging of oil depleted zones and wettability angle alteration
Leuconostoc
Xanthomonas
Surfactants
Acinetobacter
Emulsan and alasan
Emulsification and de-emulsification through reduction of interfacial tension
Injectivity profile and viscosity modification, selective plugging
Aureobasidium sp.
Pullulan
Bacillus sp.
Levan
Alcaligenes sp.
Curdlan
Leuconostoc sp.
Dextran
Sclerotium sp.
Scleroglucan
Brevibacterium
Solvents
Clostridium, Zymomonas and Klebsiella
Acetone, butanol, propan-2-diol
Rock dissolution for increasing permeability, oil viscosity reduction
Acids
Clostridium
Propionic and butyric acids
Permeability increase, emulsification
Enterobacter
Mixed acidogens
Gases
Clostridium
Methane and hydrogen
Increased pressure, oil swelling, reduction of interfacial section and viscosity; increase permeability
Enterobacter
Methanobacterium
This knowledge has been obtained from experiments with pure cultures and some times with complex microbial communities but the experimental conditions are far from mimicking those ones prevailing in oil reservoirs. It is unknown if metabolic products is cell growth dependent, and claims in this respect should be taken cautiously, since the production of a metabolite is not always dependent of cellular growth.[20]
Biomass and biopolymers
In selective plugging, conditioned cells and extracellular polymeric substances plug high permeability zones, resulting in a change of direction of the water flood to oil-rich channels, consequently increasing the sweep efficiency of oil recovery with water flooding. Biopolymer production and the resulting biofilm formation (less 27% cells, 73–98% EPS and void space) are affected by water chemistry, pH, surface charge, microbial physiology, nutrients and fluid flow.[12][13]
Biosurfactants
Microbial produced surfactants, i.e. biosurfactants reduce the interfacial tension between water and oil, and therefore a lower hydrostatic pressure is required to move the liquid entrapped in the pores to overcome the capillary effect. Secondly, biosurfactants contribute to the formation of micelles providing a physical mechanism to mobilise oil in a moving aqueous phase. Hydrophobic and hydrophilic compounds are in play and have attracted attention in MEOR research, and the main structural types are lipopeptides and glycolipids, being the fatty acid molecule the hydrophobic part. Biosurfactant produced by Pseudomonas putida exhibited higher interfacial tension (51 – 8mN/m) between oil and water, which is necessary to mobilize oil easily[21]
Gas and solvents
In this old practice, the production of gas has a positive effect in oil recovery by increasing the differential pressure driving the oil movement. Anaerobically produced methane from oil degradation have a low effect on MEOR due to its high solubility at high pressures. Carbon dioxide is also a good MEOR agent. The miscible CO2 is condensed into the liquid phase when light hydrocarbons are vaporised into the gas phase. Immiscible CO2 helps to saturate oil, resulting in swelling and reduction of viscosity of the liquid phase and consequently improving mobilization by extra driving pressure. Concomitantly, other gases and solvents may dissolve carbonate rock, leading to an increase in rock permeability and porosity.
Field studies
Worldwide MEOR field applications have been reviewed in detail.[1][2][3][5] Although the exact number field trials is unknown, Lazar et al.[1] suggested an order of hundreds. Successful MEOR field trials have been conducted in the U.S., Russia, China, Australia, Argentina, Bulgaria, former Czechoslovakia, former East Germany, Hungary, India, Malaysia, Peru, Poland, and Romania.[1][3][7] Lazar et al.[1] suggested China is leading in the area, and also found that the most successful study was carried out in Alton field, Australia (40% increase of oil production in 12 months).
The majority of the field trials were done in sandstone reservoirs and very few in fractured reservoirs and carbonates.[7] The only known offshore field trials were in Norne (Norway) and Bokor (Malaysia).[7]
As reviewed by Lazar et al.,[1] field application followed different approaches such as injection of exogenous microorganisms (microbial flooding); control of paraffin deposition; stimulation of indigenous microbes; injection of ex situ produced biopolymers; starved selected ultramicrobes (selected plugging); selected plugging by sand consolidation due to biomineralization and fracture clogging in carbonate formations; nutrient manipulation of indigenous reservoir microbes to produce ultramicrobes; and adapted mixed enrichment cultures.
Reported MEOR results from field trials vary widely. Rigorous controlled experiments are lacking and may not be possible due to the dynamic changes in the reservoir when oil is being recovered. Besides, the economical advantages of these field trials are unknown, and the answer to why the other trials were unsuccessful is unknown. General conclusions can not be drawn because the physical and mineralogical characteristics of the oil reservoirs reported were different. The extrapolation of such conclusions is therefore unviable.
A plethora of attempts to model MEOR has been published.[3][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Until now, it is unclear if theoretical results reflect the scarce published data. Developing mathematical models for MEOR is very challenging since physical, chemical and biological factors need to be considered.
Published MEOR models are composed of transport properties, conservation laws, local equilibrium, breakdown of filtration theory and physical straining.[3][29][23][24][25][26][30] Such models are so far simplistic and they were developed based on:
(A) Fundamental conservation laws, cellular growth, retention kinetics of biomass, and biomass in oil and aqueous phases. The main aim was to predict porosity retention as a function of distance and time.
(B) Filtration model to express bacterial transport as a function of pore size; and relate permeability with the rate of microbial penetration by applying Darcy's law.
Chemical kinetics is fundamental for coupling bioproduct formation to fluxes of aqueous species and suspended microbes.[31] Fully numerical approaches have also been followed.[22][32] For instance, coupled nonlinear parabolic differential equations: adding equation for the rate of diffusion of microbes and their capture by porous medium; differential balance equations for nutrient transport, including the effect of adsorption; and the assumption of bacterial growth kinetic based on Monod equation.
Monod equation is commonly used in modelling software but it has a limited behaviour for being inconsistent with the law of mass action that form the basis of kinetic characterization of microbial growth. Application of law of mass action to microbial populations results in the linear logistic equation. If the law of mass action is applied to an enzyme-catalysed process it results in the Michaelis–Menten equation, from which Monod is inspired. This makes things difficult for in situ biosurfactant production because controlled experimentation is required to determine specific growth rate and Michaelis–Menten parameters of rate-limiting enzyme reaction.
Modelling of bioclogging is complicated because the production of clogging metabolite is coupled nonlinearly to the growth of microbes and flux of nutrients transported in the fluid.
The ecophysiology of the entire microbial microcosms at oil reservoir conditions is still unclear and thus not considered by the available models. Microorganisms are a kind of catalyst whose activity (physiology) depends on the mutual interplay with other microbes and the environment (ecology). In nature, living and non living elements interact with each other in a complicated network of nutrients and energy. Some microbes produce extracellular polymeric substances and therefore its behaviour in pours media needs to consider both occupation by the EPS and the microbes themselves.[12][13] Knowledge is lacking in this respect and therefore the aim of maximizing yield and minimizing cost remains unachieved.
Realistic models for MEOR at the conditions of the oil reservoir are missing, and reported parallel-pore models had fundamental deficiencies that were overcome by models considering the clogging of pores by microbes or biofilms, but such models have also the deficiency of being two-dimensional. The utilisation of such models in three dimensional models has not been proven. It is uncertain if they can be incorporated to popular oilfield simulation software. Thus, a field strategy needs a simulator capable of predicting bacterial growth and transport through porous network and in situ production of MEOR agents.
Grounds of failure
Lack of holistic approach allowing for a critical evaluation of economics, applicability and performance of MEOR is missing.
No published study includes reservoir characteristics; biochemical and physiological characteristics of microbiota; controlling mechanisms and process economics.
The ecophysiology of microbial communities thriving in oil reservoirs is largely unexplored. Consequently, there is a poor critical evaluation of the physical and biochemical mechanisms controlling microbial response to the hydrocarbon substrates and their mobility.
Absence of quantitative understanding of microbial activity and poor understanding of the synergistic interactions between living and none living elements. Experiments based on pure cultures or enrichments are questionable because microbial communities interact synergistically with minerals, extracellular polymeric substances and other physicochemical and biological factors in the environment.
Lack of cooperation between microbiologists, reservoir engineers, geologists, economists and owner operators;[1] incomplete pertinent reservoir data, in published sources: lithology, depth, net thickness, porosity, permeability, temperature, pressure, reserves, reservoir fluid properties (oil gravity, water salinity, oil viscosity, bubble point pressure, and oil-formation-volume factor), specific EOR data (number of production and injection wells, incremental recovery potential as mentioned by the operator, injection rate, calculated daily and total enhanced production), calculated incremental recovery potential over the reported time.
Limited understanding of MEOR process economics and improper assessment of technical, logistical, cost, and oil recovery potential.
Unknowns life cycle assessments. Unknown environmental impact
Lack of demonstrable quantitative relationships between microbial performance, reservoir characteristics and operating conditions
Inconsistency with in situ performance; low ultimate oil recovery factor; uncertainty about meeting engineering design criteria by microbial process; and a general apprehension about process involving live bacteria.
Lack of rigorous controlled experiments, which are far from mimicking oil reservoir conditions that may have an effect over gene expression and protein formation.
Kinetic characterization of bacteria of interest is unknown. Monod equation has been broadly misused.
Lack of structured mathematical models to better describe MEOR.
Lack of understanding of microbial oil recovery mechanism and deficient mathematical models to predict microbial behaviour in different reservoirs.[7]
Surfactants: biodegradable, effectiveness affected by temperature, pH and salt concentration; adsorption on to rock surfaces.
Unfeasible economic solutions such as the utilization of enzymes and cultured microorganism.
Difficult isolation or engineering of good candidate strains able to survive the extreme environment of oil reservoirs (up to 85°C, up to 17.23 MPa).[3]
Trends
Remediate the formation damage caused by the chemical fracturing fluid additives in unconventional shale oil and gas reservoirs.[10]
Plug the high permeable zones near the injector and optimize the injection profile.
Dispersion of components necessary to the target.
Mitigation of unwanted secondary activity due to competitive redox processes such as sulphate reduction, i.e. control of souring, control of microbiologically induced corrosion.
Microbial paraffin removal.
Microbial skin damage removal.
Water floods, where continuous water phase enables the introduction of MEOR.
Single-well stimulation, here the low cost makes MEOR the best choice.
Selective plugging strategies.
Genetically engineered MEOR microorganisms able to survive, grow and produce metabolites at the expense of cheap nutrients and substrates.
Application of extremophiles: halophiles, barophiles, and thermophiles.
Competition of exogenous microbes with indigenous micro flora, no understanding of microbial activity.
Related Research Articles
Bioremediation broadly refers to any process wherein a biological system, living or dead, is employed for removing environmental pollutants from air, water, soil, flue gasses, industrial effluents etc., in natural or artificial settings. The natural ability of organisms to adsorb, accumulate, and degrade common and emerging pollutants has attracted the use of biological resources in treatment of contaminated environment. In comparison to conventional physicochemical treatment methods bioremediation may offer advantages as it aims to be sustainable, eco-friendly, cheap, and scalable.
Biological augmentation is the addition of archaea or bacterial cultures required to speed up the rate of degradation of a contaminant. Organisms that originate from contaminated areas may already be able to break down waste, but perhaps inefficiently and slowly.
Industrial fermentation is the intentional use of fermentation in manufacturing processes. In addition to the mass production of fermented foods and drinks, industrial fermentation has widespread applications in chemical industry. Commodity chemicals, such as acetic acid, citric acid, and ethanol are made by fermentation. Moreover, nearly all commercially produced industrial enzymes, such as lipase, invertase and rennet, are made by fermentation with genetically modified microbes. In some cases, production of biomass itself is the objective, as is the case for single-cell proteins, baker's yeast, and starter cultures for lactic acid bacteria used in cheesemaking.
A petroleum reservoir or oil and gas reservoir is a subsurface accumulation of hydrocarbons contained in porous or fractured rock formations. Such reservoirs form when kerogen is created in surrounding rock by the presence of high heat and pressure in the Earth's crust.
Microbial corrosion, also called microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC), microbially induced corrosion (MIC), or biocorrosion, is when microbes affect the electrochemical environment of the surface they are on. This usually involves building a biofilm, which can lead to either an increase in corrosion of the surface or, in a process called microbial corrosion inhibition, protect the surface from corrosion.
Enhanced oil recovery, also called tertiary recovery, is the extraction of crude oil from an oil field that cannot be extracted otherwise. Although the primary and secondary recovery techniques rely on the pressure differential between the surface and the underground well, enhanced oil recovery functions by altering the chemical composition of the oil itself in order to make it easier to extract. EOR can extract 30% to 60% or more of a reservoir's oil, compared to 20% to 40% using primary and secondary recovery. According to the US Department of Energy, carbon dioxide and water are injected along with one of three EOR techniques: thermal injection, gas injection, and chemical injection. More advanced, speculative EOR techniques are sometimes called quaternary recovery.
Microbial genetics is a subject area within microbiology and genetic engineering. Microbial genetics studies microorganisms for different purposes. The microorganisms that are observed are bacteria, and archaea. Some fungi and protozoa are also subjects used to study in this field. The studies of microorganisms involve studies of genotype and expression system. Genotypes are the inherited compositions of an organism. Genetic Engineering is a field of work and study within microbial genetics. The usage of recombinant DNA technology is a process of this work. The process involves creating recombinant DNA molecules through manipulating a DNA sequence. That DNA created is then in contact with a host organism. Cloning is also an example of genetic engineering.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) flooding is a process in which carbon dioxide is injected into an oil reservoir to increase the output when extracting oil. This is most often used in reservoirs where production rates have declined due to depletion.
Petroleum is a fossil fuel that can be drawn from beneath the Earth's surface. Reservoirs of petroleum are formed through the mixture of plants, algae, and sediments in shallow seas under high pressure. Petroleum is mostly recovered from oil drilling. Seismic surveys and other methods are used to locate oil reservoirs. Oil rigs and oil platforms are used to drill long holes into the earth to create an oil well and extract petroleum. After extraction, oil is refined to make gasoline and other products such as tires and refrigerators. Extraction of petroleum can be dangerous and have led to oil spills.
The microbial food web refers to the combined trophic interactions among microbes in aquatic environments. These microbes include viruses, bacteria, algae, heterotrophic protists. In aquatic ecosystems, microbial food webs are essential because they form the basis for the cycling of nutrients and energy. These webs are vital to the stability and production of ecosystems in a variety of aquatic environments, including lakes, rivers, and oceans. By converting dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and other nutrients into biomass that larger organisms may eat, microbial food webs maintain higher trophic levels. Thus, these webs are crucial for energy flow and nutrient cycling in both freshwater and marine ecosystems.
Heavy oil production is a developing technology for extracting heavy oil in industrial quantities. Estimated reserves of heavy oil are over 6 trillion barrels, three times that of conventional oil and gas.
Agricultural microbiology is a branch of microbiology dealing with plant-associated microbes and plant and animal diseases. It also deals with the microbiology of soil fertility, such as microbial degradation of organic matter and soil nutrient transformations. The primary goal of agricultural microbiology is to comprehensively explore the interactions between beneficial microorganisms like bacteria and fungi with crops. It also deals with the microbiology of soil fertility, such as microbial degradation of organic matter and soil nutrient transformations.
Petroleum microbiology is a branch of microbiology that deals with the study of microorganisms that can metabolize or alter crude or refined petroleum products. These microorganisms, also called hydrocarbonoclastic microorganisms, can degrade hydrocarbons and, include a wide distribution of bacteria, methanogenic archaea, and some fungi. Not all hydrocarbonoclasic microbes depend on hydrocarbons to survive, but instead may use petroleum products as alternative carbon and energy sources. Interest in this field is growing due to the increasing use of bioremediation of oil spills.
Bioremediation of petroleum contaminated environments is a process in which the biological pathways within microorganisms or plants are used to degrade or sequester toxic hydrocarbons, heavy metals, and other volatile organic compounds found within fossil fuels. Oil spills happen frequently at varying degrees along with all aspects of the petroleum supply chain, presenting a complex array of issues for both environmental and public health. While traditional cleanup methods such as chemical or manual containment and removal often result in rapid results, bioremediation is less labor-intensive, expensive, and averts chemical or mechanical damage. The efficiency and effectiveness of bioremediation efforts are based on maintaining ideal conditions, such as pH, RED-OX potential, temperature, moisture, oxygen abundance, nutrient availability, soil composition, and pollutant structure, for the desired organism or biological pathway to facilitate reactions. Three main types of bioremediation used for petroleum spills include microbial remediation, phytoremediation, and mycoremediation. Bioremediation has been implemented in various notable oil spills including the 1989 Exxon Valdez incident where the application of fertilizer on affected shoreline increased rates of biodegradation.
Bioclogging or biological clogging refers to the blockage of pore space in soil by microbial biomass, including active cells and their byproducts such as extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). The microbial biomass obstructs pore spaces, creating an impermeable layer in the soil and significantly reducing water infiltration rates.
The branches of microbiology can be classified into pure and applied sciences. Microbiology can be also classified based on taxonomy, in the cases of bacteriology, mycology, protozoology, and phycology. There is considerable overlap between the specific branches of microbiology with each other and with other disciplines, and certain aspects of these branches can extend beyond the traditional scope of microbiology In general the field of microbiology can be divided in the more fundamental branch and the applied microbiology (biotechnology). In the more fundamental field the organisms are studied as the subject itself on a deeper (theoretical) level. Applied microbiology refers to the fields where the micro-organisms are applied in certain processes such as brewing or fermentation. The organisms itself are often not studied as such, but applied to sustain certain processes.
Banwari Lal is an Indian environmental and industrial biotechnologist and the director of the Environmental and Industrial Biotechnology Division at The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI). Known for the development of oilzapper technology, Dr. Lal is the chief executive officer of ONGC-TERI Biotech Limited, a collaborative venture between TERI and the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation since 2008. The Department of Biotechnology of the Government of India awarded him the National Bioscience Award for Career Development, one of the highest Indian science awards, for his contributions to biosciences in 2004. He have many Indian and international joint patents with ONGC, DBT, IOCL, OIL INDIA and TERI.
Polyglucan is any polysaccharide that contains glucan units. Specifically, polyglucan's are a structural polysaccharide. The basic polyglucan unit consists of a long linear chain of several hundred to many thousands D-glucose monomers attached with a type of covalent bond called, glycosidic bonds. The point of attachment is O-glycosidic bonds, where a glycosidic oxygen links the glycoside to the reducing end sugar. Polyglucans naturally occur in the cell walls of bacteria. Bacteria produce this polysaccharide in a cluster near the bacteria's cells. Polyglucan's are a source of beta-glucans. Structurally, beta 1.3-glucans are complex glucose homopolymers binding together in a beta-1,3 configuration.
The viral shunt is a mechanism that prevents marine microbial particulate organic matter (POM) from migrating up trophic levels by recycling them into dissolved organic matter (DOM), which can be readily taken up by microorganisms. The DOM recycled by the viral shunt pathway is comparable to the amount generated by the other main sources of marine DOM.
Microbial electrochemical technologies (METs) use microorganisms as electrochemical catalyst, merging the microbial metabolism with electrochemical processes for the production of bioelectricity, biofuels, H2 and other valuable chemicals. Microbial fuel cells (MFC) and microbial electrolysis cells (MEC) are prominent examples of METs. While MFC is used to generate electricity from organic matter typically associated with wastewater treatment, MEC use electricity to drive chemical reactions such as the production of H2 or methane. Recently, microbial electrosynthesis cells (MES) have also emerged as a promising MET, where valuable chemicals can be produced in the cathode compartment. Other MET applications include microbial remediation cell, microbial desalination cell, microbial solar cell, microbial chemical cell, etc.,.
1 2 3 Van Hamme, J.D., A. Singh, and O.P. Ward, Petroleum microbiology – Part 1: Underlying biochemistry and physiology. Chimica Oggi-Chemistry Today, 2006. 24(1): p. 52
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Fujiwara, K., et al., Biotechnological approach for development of microbial enhanced oil recovery technique. Petroleum Biotechnology: Developments and Perspectives, 2004. 151: p. 405-445
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Awan, A.R., R. Teigland, and J. Kleppe, A survey of North Sea enhanced-oil-recovery projects initiated during the years 1975 to 2005. Spe Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2008. 11(3): p. 497-512
↑ Daims, H., M.W. Taylor, and M. Wagner, Wastewater treatment: a model system for microbial ecology. Trends in Biotechnology, 2006. 24(11): p. 483
1 2 Singh, A., J.D. van Hamme, and O.P. Ward, Petroleum microbiology – Part 2 – Recovery, biorefining and biodegradation processes. Chimica Oggi-Chemistry Today, 2006. 24(2): p. 65-67
1 2 3 Flemming, H.C. and J. Wingender, Relevance of microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) – Part II: Technical aspects. Water Science and Technology, 2001. 43(6): p. 9-16
1 2 3 Flemming, H.C. and J. Wingender, Relevance of microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) – Part I: Structural and ecological aspects. Water Science and Technology, 2001. 43(6): p. 1-8
↑ Fredrickson J K, M.J.P., Bjornstad B N, Long P E, Ringelberg D B, White D C, Krumholz L R, Suflita J M, Colwell F S, Lehman R M, Phelps T J., Pore-size constraints on the activity and survival of subsurface bacteria in a late Cretaceous shale-sandstone sequence, northwestern New Mexico. Geomicrobiololy Journal, 1997(14): p. 183-202
↑ Krumholz, L.R., Microbial communities in the deep subsurface. Hydrogeology Journal, 2000. 8(1): p. 4-10
↑ Shuler, M.L. and F. Kargi, Bioprocess Engineering: Basic Concepts. International Series in the Physical and Chemical Engineering Sciences. 2001: Prentice-Hall 576
1 2 Islam, M.R. and A. Gianetto, Mathematical modeling and scaling up of microbial enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1993. 32(4): p. 30-36
1 2 Lawrence, J.R. and M.J. Hendry, Transport of bacteria through geologic media. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 1996. 42(4): p. 410-422
1 2 Gang, H.Z., M.T. Liu, and B.Z. Mu, Characterization of microbial transport in cylindrical pores. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2006. 14(6): p. 819-824
1 2 Behlulgil, K. and M.T. Mehmetoglu, Mathematical modeling of the soaking period in a microbial enhanced oil recovery application. Energy Sources, 2003. 25(9): p. 871-877
1 2 Yu, L., et al., The effects of environmental conditions on the growth of petroleum microbes by microcalorimetry. Thermochimica Acta, 2000. 359(2): p. 95-101
↑ Stewart, T.L. and D.S. Kim, Modeling of biomass-plug development and propagation in porous media. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2004. 17(2): p. 107-119
↑ Desouky, S.M., et al., Modelling and laboratory investigation of microbial enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 1996. 15(2–4): p. 309-320
↑ Islam, M.R. and A. Gianetto, Mathematical modeling and scaling up of microbial enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1993. 32(4): p. 30-36
↑ Stewart, T.L. and D.S. Kim, Modeling of biomass-plug development and propagation in porous media. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2004. 17(2): p. 107-119
↑ Bryant, S.L. and T.P. Lockhart, Reservoir engineering analysis of microbial enhanced oil recovery. Spe Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2002. 5(5): p. 365-374
↑ Desouky, S.M., et al., Modelling and laboratory investigation of microbial enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 1996. 15(2–4): p. 309-320
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
