Neuroqueer theory

Last updated

Neuroqueer theory is a framework that intersects the fields of neurodiversity and queer theory. It examines the ways society constructs and defines normalcy, particularly concerning gender, sexual orientation, and dis/ability, and challenges those constructions. It critiques the pathologization of neurodivergent individuals and the ways in which this intersects with the marginalization of queer individuals.

Contents

The term neuroqueer can be used as a verb, adjective, or identity label. As a verb, it refers to the act of challenging neuronormativity and heteronormativity, as well as advocating for recognition and celebration diverse experiences and identities. As an adjective, neuroqueer describes phenomena, theories, or identities that challenge neuronormativity and heteronormativity, emphasizing the intersections and diversity of queer and neurodivergent identities and experiences. Individuals who identify as neuroqueer are often neurodivergent and queer, though this is not a necessity. Nick Walker, who initially coined the term, has indicated that neurotypical, cisgender, heterosexual individuals may also identity as neuroqueer if they are actively challenging neuronormativity and heteronormativity, [1] especially if they are challenging the existing categorizations of gender, dis/ability label, or sexual orientation. [2] [3]

History

Neuroqueer theory grew from the existing fields of disability studies and queer theory. The former arose as a field of scholarship in the 1970s following the disability rights movement and sought to center the perspectives of people with disabilities, as well as challenge existing understandings of disability. [3] This resulted in the social model of disability, which views disability as a societal failure rather than an individual deficit. For example, the social model of disability argues that a deaf person is disabled not by their inability to hear but rather by societal structures that privilege hearing; as such, to reduce barriers, social should provide greater access for deaf people, such as access to sign language interpreters and audio captioning, rather than asking the deaf person to use hearing aids and cochlear implants. Disability studies and the disability rights movement have also pushed for inclusive language, including person-first language, such as "person with autism".

Since the rise of disability studies and the disability rights movement, both scholars and people with disabilities have critiqued the focus on people with physical impairments, [2] often to the detriment of those who have disabilities related to the mind, as well as people with chronic illnesses. This resulted in the development of Mad studies and other disciplines. The term neurodivergence arose in the 1990s "to disrupt deficit-laden narratives of dis/abilities related to the mind, particularly autism" and has since been used "to promote discourses of diversity in terms of neurological functioning and performance". [3] Further, many advocates and scholars argued against person-first language when referring to neurodivergence as they saw neurodivergence as an identity, not a diagnosis. As such, "to place dis/abled, autistic, or neurodivergent after the preposition ‘with’ is to view the corresponding term as a pejorative, a negative association that should be separated from one’s personhood". [4]

Queer theory emerged in the 1990s to analyze and challenge heteronormativity. Queer theorists have often used the verb to queer to refer to the act of idealizing and inventing "an always-becoming-future by looking and examining the world (and the actions occurring within it) in ways that have not yet been imagined". [4]

Nick Walker coined the term neuroqueer in 2008, [5] though Athena Lynn Michaels-Dillon had also independently coined the phrase, and Remi Yergeau had been considering the concept, as well, referring to it as neurological queerness. [6] Walker used the term in relation to queer theory to "examin[e] how socially-imposed neuronormativity and socially-imposed heteronormativity were entwined with one another, and how the queering of either of those two forms of normativity entwined with and blended into the queering of the other one." [7] The word neuroqueer first appeared in print on the back cover of Michaels-Dillon's novel Defiant (2015) and in Yergeau's Authoring Autism (2018). [1]

The use of neuroqueer has since grown to refer to a field of academic study, as well as an identity label. Those who claim "a neuroqueer identity recognize that discourses of person-first language or celebrated differences do not shift ableist constructions of neurological functioning as they purport to do", given that "ableism systematically and systemically constructed what it means to be ‘normal’", which excludes neurodivergent and queer individuals. As such, individuals who claim a neuroqueer identity "deliberately dissociate with ableist assimilation practices by purposefully resisting conformity while finding pride in one’s selfhood. This act, in turn, queers what it means to exist, act, and perform in social spheres." [4]

Definition

Neuroqueer was initially conceptualized as a verb--neuroqueering--as a way of "queering [...] neurocognitive norms as well as gender norms". [7] Walker has indicated that, as a verb, neuroqueer "refers to a broad range of interrelated practices", and "as an adjective, it describes things that are associated with those practices or that result from those practices". [8]

Nick Walker, Athena Lynn Michaels-Dillon, and Remi Yergeau established the following eight integral components: [9]

  1. As an adjective, neuroqueer can refer to people who are "both neurodivergent and queer, with some degree of conscious awareness and/or active exploration around how these two aspects of one’s being entwine and interact".
  2. As an adjective, neuroqueer means "embodying and expressing one’s neurodivergence in ways that also queer one’s performance of gender, sexuality, ethnicity, and/or other aspects of one’s identity".
  3. As a verb, neuroqueer means "engaging in practices intended to undo and subvert one’s own cultural conditioning and one’s ingrained habits of neuronormative and heteronormative performance, with the aim of reclaiming one’s capacity to give more full expression to one’s uniquely weird potentials and inclinations".
  4. As a verb, neuroqueer means "engaging in the queering of one’s own neurocognitive processes (and one’s outward embodiment and expression of those processes) by intentionally altering them in ways that create significant and lasting increase in one’s divergence from prevailing cultural standards of neuronormativity and heteronormativity".
  5. As a verb, neuroqueer means "approaching, embodying, and/or experiencing one’s neurodivergence as a form of queerness".
  6. As a verb, neuroqueer means "producing literature, art, scholarship, and/or other cultural artifacts that foreground neuroqueer experiences, perspectives, and voices".
  7. As a verb, neuroqueer means "producing critical responses to literature and/or other cultural artifacts, focusing on intentional or unintentional characterizations of neuroqueerness and how those characterizations illuminate and/or are illuminated by actual neuroqueer lives and experiences".
  8. As a verb, neuroqueer means "working to transform social and cultural environments in order to create spaces and communities— and ultimately a society— in which engagement in any or all of the above practices is permitted, accepted, supported, and encouraged".

Although these core concepts have been described, Walker and others argue that the neuroqueer community often "actively resist[s] any authoritative definition". As such, any "conceptualization should not be viewed as comprehensive or definitive. Never static, the term neuroqueer is fluid, shifting, and always adapting". [10]

Applications

Neurodivergence has been pathologized and associated with various diagnosis, including autism, attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder, and specific learning differences, among others. Neuroqueer theory aims to depathologize such differences and as such, has implications across diverse sectors, including education and research.

Education

Because neurodivergence has been pathologized, educational institutions generally view neurodivergence as a deficit and focus on what students are not able to do or learn. Therefore, such institutions veer "toward rehabilitative, behaviorist, and interventionist approaches, seeking to remediate students who do not perform in socially acceptable ways of acting, being, and learning in schools". Similarly, educational research regarding neurodivergent individuals "habitually emphasizes evidence-based practices to promote the improvement of students’ academic skills across content areas based on discrete measures of performance". [11] Neuroqueer theory rejects the pathologization of neurodivergence and thus "rejects pedagogical approaches and research inquiries that seek to ‘fix’ students, so they present similarly to their ‘typical peers.’" [11] As Kleekamp describes, "future neuroqueer educational possibilities serve to reframe educational spaces, including higher education, for students at the intersections of normalized expectations related to gender, sexuality, and dis/ability". Importantly, neuroqueer theory

creates space for a wide range of research and pedagogical aspirations seeking to restory the experiences of students who have not often been centered as legitimate classroom actors nor honored for their unique educational contributions. In turn, to center and imagine from a neuroqueer perspective serves education in moving toward a more radically inclusive pedagogical and research future. [12]

Intersections of gender, sexuality, and disability

Through popular media and research, dis/abled people are often viewed as asexual and agender, [13] especially "when they are unable to meet typical performative expectations", as is common for neurodivergent people. [14] This not only leads to the infantilization of dis/abled people but can also restrict access to certain communities, resources, and support; this is of especial concern for individuals who also identify as LGBT+. [15]

Notable scholars

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>Queer</i> Umbrella term for people who are not heterosexual or not cisgender

Queer is an umbrella term for people who are not heterosexual or are not cisgender. Originally meaning 'strange' or 'peculiar', queer came to be used pejoratively against LGBT people in the late 19th century. Beginning in the late 1980s, queer activists, such as the members of Queer Nation, began to reclaim the word as a deliberately provocative and politically radical alternative to the more assimilationist branches of the LGBT community.

The word cisgender describes a person whose gender identity corresponds to their sex assigned at birth, i.e., someone who is not transgender. The prefix cis- is Latin and means on this side of. The term cisgender was coined in 1994 as an antonym to transgender, and entered into dictionaries starting in 2015 as a result of changes in social discourse about gender. The term has been and continues to be controversial and subject to critique.

Queer theory is a field of post-structuralist critical theory that emerged in the early 1990s out of queer studies and women's studies. The term "queer theory" can have various meanings depending upon its usage, but has been broadly associated with the study and theorization of gender and sexual practices that exist outside of heterosexuality, and which challenge the notion that heterosexual desire is "normal". Following social constructivist developments in sociology, queer theorists are often critical of what they consider essentialist views of sexuality and gender. Instead, they study those concepts as social and cultural phenomena, often through an analysis of the categories, binaries, and language in which they are said to be portrayed.

Heteronormativity is the concept that heterosexuality is the preferred or normal sexual orientation. It assumes the gender binary and that sexual and marital relations are most fitting between people of opposite sex.

Passing is the ability of a person to be regarded as a member of an identity group or category, such as racial identity, ethnicity, caste, social class, sexual orientation, gender, religion, age and/or disability status, that is often different from their own. Passing may be used to increase social acceptance to cope with stigma by removing stigma from the presented self and could result in other social benefits as well. Thus, passing may serve as a form of self-preservation or self-protection if expressing one's true or prior identity may be dangerous.

Femme is a term traditionally used to describe a lesbian woman who exhibits a feminine identity or gender presentation. While commonly viewed as a lesbian term, alternate meanings of the word also exist with some non-lesbian individuals using the word, notably some gay men, bisexuals, non-binary, and transgender individuals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neurodiversity</span> Non-pathological explanation of variations in mental functions

Neurodiversity is a framework for understanding human brain function and mental illness. It argues that diversity in human cognition is normal and that some conditions classified as mental disorders are differences and disabilities that are not necessarily pathological.

A hidden curriculum is a set of lessons "which are learned but not openly intended" to be taught in school such as the norms, values, and beliefs conveyed in both the classroom and social environment.

Disability studies is an academic discipline that examines the meaning, nature, and consequences of disability. Initially, the field focused on the division between "impairment" and "disability", where impairment was an impairment of an individual's mind or body, while disability was considered a social construct. This premise gave rise to two distinct models of disability: the social and medical models of disability. In 1999 the social model was universally accepted as the model preferred by the field. However, in recent years, the division between the social and medical models has been challenged. Additionally, there has been an increased focus on interdisciplinary research. For example, recent investigations suggest using "cross-sectional markers of stratification" may help provide new insights on the non-random distribution of risk factors capable of exacerbating disablement processes. Such risk factors can be acute or chronic stressors, which can increase cumulative risk factors The decline of immune function with age and decrease of inter-personal relationships which can impact cognitive function with age.

LGBT linguistics is the study of language as used by members of LGBT communities. Related or synonymous terms include lavender linguistics, advanced by William Leap in the 1990s, which "encompass[es] a wide range of everyday language practices" in LGBT communities, and queer linguistics, which refers to the linguistic analysis concerning the effect of heteronormativity on expressing sexual identity through language. The former term derives from the longtime association of the color lavender with LGBT communities. "Language", in this context, may refer to any aspect of spoken or written linguistic practices, including speech patterns and pronunciation, use of certain vocabulary, and, in a few cases, an elaborate alternative lexicon such as Polari.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lydia X. Z. Brown</span> Autistic disability rights activist

Lydia X. Z. Brown is an American autistic disability rights activist, writer, attorney, and public speaker who was honored by the White House in 2013. They are the chairperson of the American Bar Association Civil Rights & Social Justice Disability Rights Committee. They are also Policy Counsel for Privacy & Data at the Center for Democracy & Technology, and Director of Policy, Advocacy, & External Affairs at the Autistic Women & Nonbinary Network. In 2022, they unsuccessfully ran for the Maryland House of Delegates in District 7A, losing to state delegate Kathy Szeliga and delegate-elect Ryan Nawrocki.

Queer ecology is the endeavor to understand nature, biology, and sexuality in the light of queer theory, thus rejecting the presumption that heterosexuality and cisgenderedness constitute any objective standard. It draws from science studies, ecofeminism, environmental justice, and queer geography. These perspectives break apart various "dualisms" that exist within human understandings of nature and culture.

Disability justice is a social justice movement which focuses on examining disability and ableism as they relate to other forms of oppression and identity such as race, class and gender. It was developed in 2005 by the Disability Justice Collective, a group including Patty Berne, Mia Mingus, Stacey Milbern, Leroy F. Moore Jr., and Eli Clare. In disability justice, disability is not considered to be defined in "white terms, or male terms, or straight terms." The movement also believes that ableism makes other forms of prejudice possible and that systems of oppression are intertwined. The disability justice framework is being applied to a intersectional reexamination of a wide range of disability, human rights, and justice movements.

Crip, slang for cripple, is a term in the process of being reclaimed by disabled people. Wright State University suggests that the current community definition of crip includes people who experience any form of disability, such as one or more impairments with physical, mental, learning, and sensory, though the term primarily targets physical and mobility impairment. People might identify as a crip for many reasons. Some of these reasons are to show pride, to talk about disability rights, or avoid ranking types of disability.

Homonormativity is the adoption of heteronormative ideals and constructs onto LGBT culture and identity. It is predicated on the assumption that the norms and values of heterosexuality should be replicated and performed among homosexual people. Those who assert this theory claim homonormativity selectively privileges cisgendered homosexuality as worthy of social acceptance.

Bisexual theory is a field of critical theory, inspired by queer theory and bisexual politics, that foregrounds bisexuality as both a theoretical focus and as an epistemological lens. Bisexual theory emerged most prominently in the 1990s, in response to the burgeoning field of queer theory, and queer studies more broadly, frequently employing similar post-structuralist approaches but redressing queer theory's tendency towards bisexual erasure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Autism and LGBT identities</span>

Current research indicates that autistic people have higher rates of LGBT identities and feelings than the general population. A variety of explanations for this have been proposed, such as prenatal hormonal exposure, which has been linked with both sexual orientation, gender dysphoria and autism. Alternatively, autistic people may be less reliant on social norms and thus are more open about their orientation or gender identity. A narrative review published in 2016 stated that while various hypotheses have been proposed for an association between autism and gender dysphoria, they lack strong evidence.

M. Remi Yergeau is an American academic in the fields of rhetoric and writing studies, digital studies, queer rhetoric, disability studies, and theories of mind. As of 2024, Yergeau is an Arthur F. Thurnau associate professor of Digital Studies and English at the University of Michigan.

Nick Walker is an American scholar, author, webcomic creator, and aikido teacher, known for coining the term neuroqueer, establishing the foundations of neuroqueer theory, and contributing to the development of the neurodiversity paradigm. She is a professor at California Institute of Integral Studies (CIIS).

Kassiane A. Asasumasu is a Hapa Asian autism rights activist who is credited for coining several terms related to the Neurodiversity Movement, including caregiver benevolence (2014), neurodivergent, and neurodivergence (2000). As stated in the text Neurodiversity for Dummies, "Asasumasu's work set the stage for a broader understanding and acceptance of neurological differences", which "continue[s] to be shared, shaped and formed by all sorts of people who recogniz[e] that our world should be accepting, inclusive, and accommodating of people regardless of their neurotype".

References

Notes

  1. 1 2 Walker 2021, p. 116.
  2. 1 2 Egner 2019, p. 124.
  3. 1 2 3 Kleekamp 2022, p. 411.
  4. 1 2 3 Kleekamp 2022, p. 412.
  5. Walker 2021, pp. 7, 112.
  6. Walker 2021, p. 112.
  7. 1 2 Walker 2021, p. 113.
  8. Walker 2021, p. 114.
  9. Walker 2021, p. 115-116.
  10. Kleekamp 2022, p. 410.
  11. 1 2 Kleekamp 2022, p. 413.
  12. Kleekamp 2022, p. 414.
  13. Milligan & Neufeldt 2001.
  14. Egner 2019, p. 125.
  15. Egner 2019, p. 125-126.

Bibliography

Further reading