Nexus Project

Last updated

Nexus Project
Formation2019
Founder Jonathan Jacoby
Type Nonprofit
FocusIssues at the intersection of antisemitism and Israel
Area served
United States
MethodsEducation and advocacy
National Director
Jonathan Jacoby
Washington Director
Kevin Rachlin
Project Board
Affiliations Bard Center for the Study of Hate
Staff
2
Volunteers
30
Website nexusproject.us

The Nexus Project [1] is an American non-profit organization dedicated to combating antisemitism through education, advocacy, and policy implementation. It focuses on promoting effective government action against antisemitism while fostering unity and inclusion. It opposes the use of accusations of antisemitism as political tools to stifle criticism of Israel. The Nexus Project consists of two main components: the Nexus Leadership Project and the Nexus Task Force. [2] [3] [4]

Contents

Nexus Leadership Project

The Nexus Leadership Project, [5] created in January 2024, engages with American civic and political leaders and decision-makers to enhance understanding of antisemitism, particularly where it intersects with Israel-related issues. Its primary activities include educational outreach to policymakers and advocacy for comprehensive strategies to combat antisemitism. [6] [7] [2]

Nexus Task Force

The Nexus Task Force, [8] created in November 2019, analyzes issues at the intersection of Israel and antisemitism. [9] The task force has published the Nexus Document, [10] described as "a resource designed for policymakers and community leaders, aiming to enhance their understanding of the issues that intersect at the nexus of antisemitism, Israel, and Zionism", [11] the Nexus White Paper, titled "Understanding Antisemitism at its Nexus with Israel and Zionism", [12] the Nexus "Guide to Identifying Antisemitism in Debates about Israel" [13] and "A Campus Guide To Identifying Antisemitism In A Time Of Perplexity". [14]

In September 2020, "more than 100 prominent Jewish leaders" sent a letter to Joe Biden, drawing his attention to the resources available on the "Israel & Antisemitism: Policy at the Nexus of Two Critical Issues" website. [15] [16] [17] The "U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism", released on May 25, 2023, states that "the Administration welcomes and appreciates the Nexus Document." [18]

The Nexus Task Force is affiliated with The Bard Center for the Study of Hate (BCSH), which works to increase the serious study of human hatred, and ways to combat it. [9] [19] The director of the Nexus Task Force is Jonathan Jacoby. The director of the BCSH is Kenneth S. Stern, who had been the lead drafter of the IHRA definition and its examples, and is an ex officio member of the Nexus Task Force.

On January 19, 2024, Task Force member Derek Penslar was appointed by Harvard's Interim President, Alan Garber, to co-chair Harvard's Presidential Task Force on Combating Antisemitism. [20]

Nexus Task Force members

The members of the Nexus Task Force are listed below. [9]

The Nexus Task Force is supported by a larger advisory committee. [9]

What is, and what is not, antisemitic

The big mistake people are making about IHRA is that it’s the final word, and there are many words and perspectives ... You can think of IHRA as the Mishnah and Nexus as the Gemara.

Jonathan Jacoby, The Forward [15]

The Nexus Document, [10] which is based on the Nexus White Paper, states that a determination of whether speech or conduct about Zionism and Israel is antisemitic should be based on the standards for speech or conduct that apply to antisemitic behavior in general.  It gives seven examples of what should be deemed antisemitic, followed by four examples of what should not be.

Actions that are considered to be antisemitic

According to the Nexus Document, it is antisemitic:

  • To promote myths, stereotypes or attitudes about Zionism and/or Israel that derive from and/or reinforce antisemitic accusations and tropes. These include:
    • Characterizing Israel as being part of a sinister world conspiracy of Jewish control of the media, economy, government or other financial, cultural or societal institutions.
    • Indiscriminately blaming suffering and injustices around the world on a hidden Jewish conspiracy or of being the maligning hand of Israel or Zionism.
    • Holding individuals or institutions, because they are Jewish, a priori culpable of real or imagined wrongdoing committed by Israel.
    • Considering Jews to be a priori incapable of setting aside their loyalty to the Jewish people and/or Israel.
    • Denigrating or denying the Jewish identity of certain Jews because they are perceived as holding the “wrong” position (whether too critical or too favorable) on Israel.
  • To use symbols and images that present all Jews as collectively guilty for the actions of the State of Israel.
  • To attack and/or physically harm a Jew because of her/his relationship to Israel.
  • To convey intense hostility toward Jews who are connected to Israel in a way that intentionally or irresponsibly (acting with disregard to potential violent consequences) provokes antisemitic violence.
  • To treat Israel in a negative manner based on a claim that Jews alone should be denied the right to define themselves as a people and to exercise any form of self-determination.
  • To advocate a political solution that denies Jews the right to define themselves as a people, thereby denying them – because they are Jews – the right to self-determination.
  • To treat Israel differently solely because it is a Jewish state, using standards different than those applied to other countries.

Actions that are not considered to be antisemitic

However, according to the Nexus Document:

  • As a general rule, criticism of Zionism and Israel, opposition to Israel's policies, or nonviolent political action directed at the State of Israel and/or its policies should not, as such, be deemed antisemitic.
  • Even contentious, strident, or harsh criticism of Israel for its policies and actions, including those that led to the creation of Israel, is not per se illegitimate or antisemitic.
  • Opposition to Zionism and/or Israel does not necessarily reflect specific anti-Jewish animus nor purposefully lead to antisemitic behaviors and conditions. (For example, someone might oppose the principle of nationalism or ethnonationalist ideology. Similarly, someone's personal or national experience may have been adversely affected by the creation of the State of Israel. These motivations or attitudes towards Israel and/or Zionism do not necessarily constitute antisemitic behavior.)
  • Paying disproportionate attention to Israel and treating Israel differently than other countries is not prima facie proof of antisemitism. (There are numerous reasons for devoting special attention to Israel and treating Israel differently, e.g., some people care about Israel more; others may pay more attention because Israel has a special relationship with the United States and receives $4 billion in American aid).

Reception

Haaretz wrote "The new documents [IHRA, Nexus Task Force and Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism], then, may have achieved their goal of opening up the conversation, but consensus among Jews on what antisemitism is looks like [ sic ] – and how it relates to how Israel is discussed – seems further away than ever." [21]

An article by Ira Forman in the Moment is mildly critical of the Nexus Task Force and the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism, and concludes "These two new definitions focus on issues worthy of debate and analysis. But their guidelines represent the views of a smaller constituency. [...] From a practical perspective, the widespread adoption by dozens of countries, scores of law enforcement organizations and hundreds of governmental, educational and non-profit institutions means we should not relitigate the language of IHRA." [22]

Another article by Ira Forman, this time in The Detroit Jewish News, is again mildly critical of both the Nexus Task Force and the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism, and concludes "There is no doubt that false and reckless charges of antisemitism are a hindrance to the battle against antisemitism. But rather than campaign for an alternative tool, those involved in the fight should support the continued use of the IHRA Definition [...]". [23]

The Forward wrote that "The new definition could serve as an alternative to one from the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance [...]". [15]

A more critical article in The Forward states that the Nexus Task Force's "[...] endeavor, while undoubtedly well-meaning, is unnecessary and possibly dangerous." [24]

An article in The Jerusalem Post stated that "For outsiders to the conflict, it’s hard to understand what the fight is about. The IHRA, JDA, and Nexus definitions have many similarities and overlaps. It is in the distinctions, views on double standards, self-determination and legitimate criticism, that counter-antisemitism activists and political activists clash." [25]

The Jerusalem Post also carried an article by Ron Kampeas, with the lead paragraph "Paying disproportionate attention to Israel and treating Israel differently than other countries is not prima facie proof of anti-Semitism." [26]

The same article by Ron Kampeas appeared in The Times of Israel, with the lead paragraph "Nexus Task Force [...] says IHRA definition is too broad, not all double standards toward Jewish state manifest prejudice". [27]

U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism

The "U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism", released on May 25, 2023, includes the following paragraph:

There are several definitions of antisemitism, which serve as valuable tools to raise awareness and increase understanding of antisemitism. The most prominent is the non-legally binding “working definition” of antisemitism adopted in 2016 by the 31-member states of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), which the United States has embraced. In addition, the Administration welcomes and appreciates the Nexus Document and notes other such efforts. [18]

The inclusion of definitions other than the IHRA definition in the National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism was a topic of heated debate leading up to the Strategy's unveiling. [28]

The significance of including the Nexus Document in the National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism was noted by The New York Times, [29] NPR, [30] Vox, [31] the Jewish Insider, [32] and numerous other media outlets.

61 Jewish American leaders issued a statement praising the National Strategy to Combat Antisemitism, saying: “We are encouraged that the strategy acknowledges the necessity of employing a diverse toolkit to combat antisemitism, including the Nexus Document.” [33]

Critical reactions from some Jewish organisations

Some Jewish organisations have criticized the inclusion of the Nexus Document and/or downplayed its significance:

Deborah Lipstadt's response to the critical reactions

Responding to criticism from some Jewish organizations of the inclusion of the Nexus Document, Deborah Lipstadt, the United States Special Envoy for Monitoring and Combating Antisemitism, said that “there are portions of the Nexus Document which almost are more explicit than the IHRA." [38]

She quoted from the Nexus Document: "It is antisemitic to promote myths, stereotypes or attitudes about Zionism and/or Israel that derive from and/or reinforce antisemitic accusations and tropes." [38]

According to the Nexus Document, these include: "Characterizing Israel as being part of a sinister world conspiracy of Jewish control of the media, economy, government or other financial, cultural or societal institutions; Indiscriminately blaming suffering and injustices around the world on a hidden Jewish conspiracy or of being the maligning hand of Israel or Zionism; Holding individuals or institutions, because they are Jewish, a priori culpable of real or imagined wrongdoing committed by Israel," and so on. [10]

"That's pretty explicit,” Lipstadt said. “I think some of the things that have been said about Nexus are not accurate. There were parts in there that some people can see as troublesome. I'm not denying that, but we didn't adopt or embrace Nexus. We recognize that because of where it's explicit there, that is helpful to us." [38]

October 2023 November 2024

Hamas attack of October 2023

Following the Hamas terror attack of October 7, 2023, when some left and pro-Palestinian advocates demonstrated support for Hamas despite the murder of innocents, Nexus Task Force member David Schraub wrote a column with Alan Solow, a former Chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, asserting that the Biden administration's National Antisemitism Strategy is a more effective tool for forming alliances across the wide range of American constituencies and communities because it incorporates the Nexus Document and does not rely solely on the IHRA definition. [39]

Subsequent responses to antisemitism and allegations of antisemitism

Former AIPAC executive director Tom Dine, wrote "The Nexus Document provides a more precise characterization of antisemitism than IHRA’s and allows for a broader range of criticism of Israel. In doing so, it lays the groundwork for building a more expansive coalition to combat antisemitism, a coalition that is particularly important at a time like this." [40]

In an article discussing whether anti-Zionism is always antisemitic, Jonathan Weisman wrote "Jonathan Jacoby, the director of the Nexus Task Force, [...] warned that shouting down any political action directed against Israel as antisemitic made it harder for Jews to call out actual antisemitism, while stifling honest conversation about Israel’s government and U.S. policy toward it." [41]

November 2024 onward

Concerns about the possible weaponization of accusations of antisemitism

Following the election of Donald Trump as president in November 2024, the Nexus Project raised concerns that his administration could weaponize accusations of antisemitism to punish political opponents, suppress academic freedom, and silence legitimate criticism of the Israeli government’s actions.

Nexus Project National Director Jonathan Jacoby warned that he expected the incoming Trump administration to "use the idea of fighting antisemitism as a way of suppressing free speech and breaking up coalitions", adding that "Campuses, for [Trump], are a way of dividing coalitions, dividing Jews from other minorities and capitalizing on places where there are divisions and not in order to come to a common understanding." [42]

In an article highlighting Jewish leaders’ priorities and concerns for the second Trump term, Jacoby stated that, "[w]e expect the incoming Trump administration to aggressively exploit real concerns about Jewish safety for political gain" and warned that the administration could use antisemitism concerns as an excuse to target federal funding for higher education and academic freedom. Nexus is committed to differentiating between antisemitic behavior and legitimate political activity and demonstrating how Jewish students can be best protected using existing civil rights law. [43]

See also

Related Research Articles

Antisemitism or Jew-hatred is hostility to, prejudice towards, or discrimination against, Jews. This sentiment is a form of racism, and a person who harbours it is called an antisemite. Primarily, antisemitic tendencies may be motivated by negative sentiment towards Jews as a people or by negative sentiment towards Jews with regard to Judaism. In the former case, usually presented as racial antisemitism, a person's hostility is driven by the belief that Jews constitute a distinct race with inherent traits or characteristics that are repulsive or inferior to the preferred traits or characteristics within that person's society. In the latter case, known as religious antisemitism, a person's hostility is driven by their religion's perception of Jews and Judaism, typically encompassing doctrines of supersession that expect or demand Jews to turn away from Judaism and submit to the religion presenting itself as Judaism's successor faith—this is a common theme within the other Abrahamic religions. The development of racial and religious antisemitism has historically been encouraged by the concept of anti-Judaism, which is distinct from antisemitism itself.

New antisemitism is the concept that a new form of antisemitism developed in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, typically manifesting itself as anti-Zionism. The concept is included in some definitions of antisemitism, such as the working definition of antisemitism and the 3D test of antisemitism. The concept dates to the early 1970s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yehuda Bauer</span> Israeli historian of the Holocaust (1926–2024)

Yehuda Bauer was a Czech-born Israeli historian and scholar of the Holocaust. He was a professor of Holocaust studies at the Avraham Harman Institute of Contemporary Jewry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Self-hating Jew</span> Pejorative towards Jews

The terms "self-hating Jew", "self-loathing Jew", and "auto-antisemite" are pejorative terms used to describe Jewish people whose viewpoints, especially favoring Jewish assimilation, Jewish secularism, limousine liberalism, or anti-Judaism are perceived as reflecting self-hatred.

Antisemitism at universities has been reported and supported since the medieval period and, more recently, resisted and studied. Antisemitism has been manifested in various policies and practices, such as restricting the admission of Jewish students by a Jewish quota, or ostracism, intimidation, or violence against Jewish students, as well as in the hiring, retention and treatment of Jewish faculty and staff. In some instances, universities have been accused of condoning the development of antisemitic cultures on campus.

David Hirsh is a Senior Lecturer in Sociology at Goldsmiths, University of London, and co-founder of Engage, a campaign against the academic boycott of Israel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-Zionism</span> Opposition to Zionism

Anti-Zionism is opposition to Zionism. Although anti-Zionism is a heterogeneous phenomenon, all its proponents agree that the creation of the modern State of Israel, and the movement to create a sovereign Jewish state in the region of Palestine—a region partly coinciding with the biblical Land of Israel—was flawed or unjust in some way.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance</span> Intergovernmental organization

The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), until January 2013 known as the Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance, and Research or ITF, is an intergovernmental organization founded in 1998 which unites governments and experts to strengthen, advance and promote Holocaust education, research and remembrance worldwide and to uphold the commitments of the Declaration of the Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust. The IHRA has 34 member countries, one liaison country and seven observer countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-Defamation League</span> International Jewish organization

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), formerly known as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, is a New York–based international non-governmental organization that was founded to combat antisemitism, bigotry and discrimination. ADL is also known for its pro-Israel advocacy. Its current CEO is Jonathan Greenblatt. ADL headquarters are located in Murray Hill, in the New York City borough of Manhattan. The ADL has 25 regional offices in the United States including a Government Relations Office in Washington, D.C., as well as an office in Israel and staff in Europe. In its 2019 annual information Form 990, ADL reported total revenues of $92 million, the vast majority from contributions and grants. Its total operating revenue is reported at $80.9 million.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criticism of Israel</span> Disapproval towards the Israeli government

Criticism of Israel is a subject of journalistic and scholarly commentary and research within the scope of international relations theory, expressed in terms of political science. Israel has faced international criticism since its establishment in 1948 relating to a variety of issues, many of which are centered around human rights violations in its occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

The "three Ds" or the "3D test" of antisemitism is a set of criteria formulated in 2003 by Israeli human rights advocate and politician Natan Sharansky in order to distinguish legitimate criticism of Israel from antisemitism. The three Ds stand for delegitimization, demonization, and double standards, each of which, according to the test, indicates antisemitism.

The working definition of antisemitism, also called the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism or IHRA definition, is a non-legally binding statement on what antisemitism is, that reads: "Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities." It was first published by European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) in 2005 and then by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) in 2016. Accompanying the working definition, but of disputed status, are 11 illustrative examples whose purpose is described as guiding the IHRA in its work, seven of which relate to criticism of Israel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism</span> Guide on antisemitism

The Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism (JDA) is a document meant to outline the bounds of antisemitic speech and conduct, particularly with regard to Zionism, Israel and Palestine. Its creation was motivated by a desire to confront antisemitism and by objections to the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism, which critics have said stifles legitimate criticism of the Israeli government and curbs free speech. The drafting of the declaration was initiated in June 2020 under the auspices of the Van Leer Institute in Jerusalem by eight coordinators, most of whom were university professors. Upon its completion the declaration was signed by about 200 scholars in various fields and released in March 2021.

Zionist antisemitism or antisemitic Zionism refers to a phenomenon in which antisemites express support for Zionism and the State of Israel. In some cases, this support may be promoted for explicitly antisemitic reasons. Historically, this type of antisemitism has been most notable among Christian Zionists, who may perpetrate religious antisemitism while being outspoken in their support for Jewish sovereignty in Israel due to their interpretation of Christian eschatology. Similarly, people who identify with the political far-right, particularly in Europe and the United States, may support the Zionist movement because they seek to expel Jews from their country and see Zionism as the least complicated method of achieving this goal and satisfying their racial antisemitism.

On May 25, 2023, the administration of US President Joe Biden unveiled The U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism. President Biden called his administration's plan the “most ambitious and comprehensive U.S. government-led effort to fight antisemitism in American history.”

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jonathan Jacoby</span> American activist

Jonathan Jacoby is an American social activist, known for his contributions in the fields of advocacy for Israeli-Palestinian peace, combatting antisemitism, Jewish communal life, and rare disease research.

The exploitation of accusations of antisemitism, especially to counter anti-Zionism and criticism of Israel, may be described as weaponization of antisemitism, instrumentalization of antisemitism, or playing the antisemitism card. Bad-faith accusations against Israel's critics have been called a form of smear tactics. Some writers have compared them to playing the race card.

Jews have faced antisemitism and discrimination in universities and campuses in the United States, from the founding of universities in the Thirteen Colonies until the present day in varying intensities. From the early 20th century, and until the 1960s, indirect quotas were placed on Jewish admissions, quotas were first placed on Jews by elite universities such Columbia, Harvard and Yale and were prevalent as late as the 1960s in universities such as Stanford. These quotas disappeared in the 1970s.

Anti-antisemitism in Germany is the German state's institutionalised opposition to antisemitism, in acknowledgement of German history and the murder of some six million Jews by the Nazi regime in the Holocaust. Anti-antisemitism has been described as "a defining marker of post-war German identity" and a commitment to supporting Israel is considered a "Staatsräson", a fundamental principle guiding the German state's actions. Following the 2015 European migrant crisis, the German federal government and most of Germany's states set up commissioners for fighting antisemitism. Controversially, the German government officially classifies the following as antisemitic: the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement, the accusation that Israel is committing the crime of apartheid against Palestinians, and the depiction of Israel as a colonial or settler-colonial entity. Many of those arrested and cancelled in Germany over allegations of antisemitism have been Jews critical of Israel's policies.

References

  1. "Nexus Project". Nexus Project. Retrieved November 9, 2024.
  2. 1 2 Rosenfeld, Arno (January 23, 2024). "How a new group is convincing Democrats to separate Israel criticism from antisemitism". The Forward . Retrieved March 17, 2024.
  3. Tsui, Karina; Winter, Jeff (November 1, 2024). "US colleges failed to hold students accountable for antisemitic harassment, House committee says". CNN . Retrieved November 9, 2024.
  4. Myers, David N.; Stolzenberg, Nomi M. (September 16, 2024). "Opinion: Can legitimate campus protest be distinguished from antisemitism? This guide aims to help". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved November 9, 2024.
  5. "Nexus Leadership Project". Nexus Project. Retrieved November 9, 2024.
  6. Kampeas, Ron (April 15, 2024). "A bill to create a national coordinator to fight antisemitism is drawing rare bipartisan support in Congress". Jewish Telegraphic Agency . Retrieved November 9, 2024.
  7. Rod, Marc (May 22, 2024). "Across political and religious spectrum, 61 Jewish groups urge House to take up antisemitism bill". Jewish Insider . Retrieved November 9, 2024.
  8. "Nexus Task Force". Nexus Project. Retrieved November 9, 2024.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Nexus Task Force. "Nexus Task Force". Israel & Antisemitism: Policy at the Nexus of Two Critical Issues. Retrieved January 18, 2023.
  10. 1 2 3 Nexus Task Force (February 24, 2021). "The Nexus Document". Israel & Antisemitism: Policy at the Nexus of Two Critical Issues. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
  11. "Israel & Antisemitism". Israel & Antisemitism: Policy at the Nexus of Two Critical Issues. Retrieved May 29, 2023.
  12. Nexus Task force (November 22, 2020). "Understanding Antisemitism at its Nexus with Israel and Zionism". Israel & Antisemitism: Policy at the Nexus of Two Critical Issues. Retrieved January 18, 2023.
  13. Nexus Task Force. "Guide to Identifying Antisemitism in Debates about Israel". Israel & Antisemitism. Retrieved January 18, 2023.
  14. "A Campus Guide To Identifying Antisemitism In A Time Of Perplexity" (PDF). Nexus . September 3, 2024. Retrieved October 1, 2024.
  15. 1 2 3 "With backing of liberal Jewish leaders, new definition distances Israel criticism from claims of antisemitism". The Forward. March 16, 2021. Retrieved January 18, 2023.
  16. Nexus Task Force (September 18, 2020). "A Letter to Vice President Biden from American Jewish Leaders". Israel & Antisemitism: Policy at the Nexus of Two Critical Issues. Retrieved January 18, 2023.
  17. "Israel & Antisemitism - Policy at the nexus of two critical issues". Israel & Antisemitism: Policy at the nexus of two critical issues. Retrieved May 23, 2023.
  18. 1 2 "THE U.S. NATIONAL STRATEGY TO COUNTER ANTISEMITISM" (PDF). The White House. May 25, 2023. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  19. Bard College Public Relations (March 10, 2022). "Bard Center for Study of Hate Announces Affiliation with Nexus Task Force". www.bard.edu. Retrieved January 18, 2023.
  20. President, Harvard University (January 19, 2024). "Announcement of Presidential Task Forces". Harvard University President. Retrieved March 17, 2024.
  21. Shamir, Jonathan (April 18, 2021). "Two Jews, Three Definitions: New Documents Challenge Mainstream View of Antisemitism" . Haaretz. Retrieved January 20, 2023.
  22. Forman, Ira N. (April 2, 2021). "We Should Not Replace the Working Definition of Anti-Semitism" . Moment Magazine. Retrieved January 20, 2023.
  23. Forman, Ira N. (April 13, 2021). "Essay: The Working Definition of Antisemitism Needs No Rewrite". The Detroit Jewish News. Retrieved January 19, 2023.
  24. Goldfeder, Mark (April 6, 2021). "The IHRA definition isn't perfect. But its critics aren't making things better". The Forward. Retrieved January 20, 2023.
  25. Starr, Michael (April 22, 2021). "War of the words: The conflict between definitions of antisemitism". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved January 19, 2023.
  26. Kampeas, Ron (March 17, 2021). "A liberal definition of antisemitism that allows for Israel criticism". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved January 22, 2023.
  27. Kampeas, Ron (March 17, 2021). "US Jewish scholars push anti-Semitism definition allowing more Israel criticism". The Times of Israel. Retrieved January 19, 2023.
  28. Rosenfeld, Arno (May 24, 2023). "Israel 'mudslinging' threatens to overshadow White House antisemitism strategy". The Forward . Retrieved May 29, 2023.
  29. Williamson, Elizabeth (May 25, 2023). "Biden Unveils a National Plan to Fight an Ancient Hatred". The New York Times . ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved May 29, 2023.
  30. Treisman, Rachel (May 23, 2023). "The first national strategy for fighting antisemitism is finally here. What's in it?". NPR . Retrieved May 29, 2023.
  31. Guyer, Jonathan (May 25, 2023). "The high-stakes debate over how the US defines "antisemitism"". Vox . Retrieved May 29, 2023.
  32. Deutch, Gabby; Rod, Marc (May 25, 2023). "In sweeping antisemitism strategy, White House calls mainstream IHRA definition 'most prominent' but 'welcomes' progressive alternative". Jewish Insider. Retrieved May 29, 2023.
  33. "National Jewish Leadership Statement on Antisemitism". Israel & Antisemitism. May 25, 2023. Retrieved May 29, 2023.
  34. "ZOA Criticizes Biden Antisemitism Strategy's Embrace of Dangerous "Nexus" Antisemitism Definition & Not Calling Out Islamists & Other Antisemites". Zionist Organization of America . May 25, 2023. Retrieved May 29, 2023.
  35. "B'nai B'rith Lauds White House Strategy to Combat Anti-Semitism". B’nai B’rith International. May 25, 2023. Retrieved July 18, 2023.
  36. "Jewish organizations critique Biden's antisemitism strategy". The Jerusalem Post . May 29, 2023. Retrieved July 18, 2023.
  37. 1 2 "'Now the Hard Work Begins': ADL Chief on Biden's Plan to Combat Antisemitism". Haaretz . May 28, 2023. Retrieved July 18, 2023.
  38. 1 2 3 Klein, Zvika (June 11, 2023). "Lipstadt: Aware of CAIR's antisemitic past, giving them a chance to overcome". The Jerusalem Post . Retrieved July 20, 2023.
  39. Schraub, David; Solow, Alan (October 15, 2023). "Biden's antisemitism strategy was made for a moment like this". Forward . Retrieved October 16, 2023.
  40. Dine, Tom (November 19, 2023). "No partisanship in fighting against antisemitism". New York Daily News . Archived from the original on November 20, 2023. Retrieved December 17, 2023.
  41. Weisman, Jonathan (December 10, 2023). "Is Anti-Zionism Always Antisemitic? A Fraught Question for the Moment". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved December 17, 2023.
  42. Cohen, Haley (November 8, 2024). "Trump's election puts greater pressure on universities to crack down on antisemitism". Jewish Insider . Retrieved November 13, 2024.
  43. Silow-Carroll, Andrew (November 10, 2024). "We asked Jewish leaders about their priorities under a second Trump term". Jewish Telegraphic Agency . Retrieved November 13, 2024.