Part of a series on |
Antisemitism |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
This article lists expulsions, refugee crises and other forms of displacement that have affected Jews.
![]() |
The following is a list of Jewish expulsions and events that prompted significant streams of Jewish refugees.
![]() |
Country | Date of expulsion | Expulsion lifted ( de facto ) | Expulsion lifted ( de jure ) |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | 1421 | 1469 | |
![]() | 1290 | 1656 | 1753–54 |
1829 | |||
![]() | 1394 | 18th century | 27 September 1791 |
![]() | 1349 | 1350 | |
1360 | 1364 | ||
![]() | 1495 | 1503 | |
![]() | 1597 | 1714 | |
![]() | 1510 | 1735 | |
![]() | 1499 | 1850 | |
![]() | 1497 | 19th century | N/A |
![]() | 31 December 1492 | 3 February 1740 | |
![]() | 31 March 1492 | 19th century | 16 December 1968 [85] |
![]() | 1679 29 March 2021 | ||
The discrepancy between the length of the siege according to the regnal years of Zedekiah (years 9–11), on the one hand, and its length according to Jehoiachin's exile (years 9–12), on the other, can be cancelled out only by supposing the former to have been reckoned on a Tishri basis, and the latter on a Nisan basis. The difference of one year between the two is accounted for by the fact that the termination of the siege fell in the summer, between Nisan and Tishri, already in the 12th year according to the reckoning in Ezekiel, but still in Zedekiah's 11th year which was to end only in Tishri.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link){{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)These texts, combined with the relics of those who hid in caves along the western side of the Dead Sea, tell us a great deal. What is clear from the evidence of both skeletal remains and artefacts is that the Roman assault on the Jewish population of the Dead Sea was so severe and comprehensive that no one came to retrieve precious legal documents, or bury the dead. Up until this date the Bar Kokhba documents indicate that towns, villages and ports where Jews lived were busy with industry and activity. Afterwards there is an eerie silence, and the archaeological record testifies to little Jewish presence until the Byzantine era, in En Gedi. This picture coheres with what we have already determined in Part I of this study, that the crucial date for what can only be described as genocide, and the devastation of Jews and Judaism within central Judea, was 135 CE and not, as usually assumed, 70 CE, despite the siege of Jerusalem and the Temple's destruction
Up until this date the Bar Kokhba documents indicate that towns, villages and ports where Jews lived were busy with industry and activity. Afterwards there is an eerie silence, [...] This picture coheres with what we have already determined in Part I of this study, that the crucial date for what can only be described as genocide, and the devastation of Jews and Judaism within central Judea, was 135 CE and not, as usually assumed, 70 CE, despite the siege of Jerusalem and the Temple's destruction
The phenomenon was most prominent in Judea, and can be explained by the demographic changes that this region underwent after the second Jewish revolt of 132-135 C.E. The expulsion of Jews from the area of Jerusalem following the suppression of the revolt, in combination with the penetration of pagan populations into the same region, created the conditions for the diffusion of Christians into that area during the fifth and sixth centuries.
Two of the tribes--the Banu Nadir and the Banu Qaynuqa--were eventually exiled for falling short on their agreed upon commitments and for the consequent danger they posed to the nascent Muslim community.
Jordan's illegal occupation and Annexation of the West Bank