Out-of-place artifact

Last updated
Fragment of the Antikythera mechanism, a mechanical computer from the 2nd century BCE showing a previously unknown level of complexity NAMA Machine d'Anticythere 1.jpg
Fragment of the Antikythera mechanism, a mechanical computer from the 2nd century BCE showing a previously unknown level of complexity

An out-of-place artifact (OOPArt or oopart) is an artifact of historical, archaeological, or paleontological interest to someone that is claimed to have been found in an unusual context, which someone claims to challenge conventional historical chronology by its presence in that context. Some people might think that those artifacts are too advanced for the technology known to have existed at the time, or that human presence existed at a time before humans are known to have existed. Other people might hypothesize about a contact between different cultures that is hard to account for with conventional historical understanding.

Contents

This description of archaeological objects is used in fringe science such as cryptozoology, as well as by proponents of ancient astronaut theories, young Earth creationists, and paranormal enthusiasts. [1] [2] It can describe a wide variety of items, from anomalies studied by mainstream science to pseudoarchaeology to objects that have been shown to be hoaxes or to have conventional explanations.

Critics argue that most purported OOPArts which are not hoaxes are the result of mistaken interpretation and wishful thinking, such as a mistaken belief that a particular culture could not have created an artifact or technology due to a lack of knowledge or materials. In some cases, the uncertainty results from inaccurate descriptions. For example, the cuboid Wolfsegg Iron is not really a perfect cube, nor are the Klerksdorp spheres actual perfect spheres. The Iron pillar of Delhi was said to be "rust proof", but it has some rust near its base; its relative resistance to corrosion is due to slag inclusions left over from the manufacturing conditions and environmental factors. [3]

Supporters regard OOPArts as evidence that mainstream science is overlooking huge areas of knowledge, either willfully or through ignorance. [2] Many writers or researchers who question conventional views of human history have used purported OOPArts in attempts to bolster their arguments. [2] Creation science often relies on allegedly anomalous finds in the archaeological record to challenge scientific chronologies and models of human evolution. [4] Claimed OOPArts have been used to support religious descriptions of prehistory, ancient astronaut theories, and the notion of vanished civilizations that possessed knowledge or technology more advanced than that known in modern times. [2]

Unusual artifacts

The Tamil Bell is a broken bronze bell used as a cooking pot by Maori women of New Zealand. Tamilbell1.JPG
The Tamil Bell is a broken bronze bell used as a cooking pot by Māori women of New Zealand.
The Shroud of Turin: modern photo of the face, positive left, digitally processed negative image right Turin shroud positive and negative displaying original color information 708 x 465 pixels 94 KB.jpg
The Shroud of Turin: modern photo of the face, positive left, digitally processed negative image right

Questionable interpretations

The three components of the Baghdad Battery Ironie pile Bagdad.jpg
The three components of the Baghdad Battery

Alternative interpretations

The iron pillar of Delhi QtubIronPillar.JPG
The iron pillar of Delhi

Natural objects mistaken for artifacts

Eltanin Antenna Eltanin Antenna.jpg
Eltanin Antenna

Erroneously dated objects

Modern-day creations, forgeries and hoaxes

Babylonokia Babylonokia.jpg
Babylonokia

See also

Authors and works

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piltdown Man</span> 1912 paleoanthropological hoax

The Piltdown Man was a paleoanthropological fraud in which bone fragments were presented as the fossilised remains of a previously unknown early human. Although there were doubts about its authenticity virtually from the beginning, the remains were still broadly accepted for many years, and the falsity of the hoax was only definitively demonstrated in 1953. An extensive scientific review in 2016 established that amateur archaeologist Charles Dawson was responsible for the fraudulent evidence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">America's Stonehenge</span> Tourist attraction in New Hampshire

America's Stonehenge is a privately owned tourist attraction and archaeological site consisting of a number of large rocks and stone structures scattered around roughly 30 acres within the town of Salem, New Hampshire, in the United States. It is open to the public for a fee as part of a recreational area which includes snowshoe trails and an alpaca farm.

Shinichi Fujimura is a Japanese amateur archaeologist who claimed he had found a large number of stone artifacts dating back to the Lower Paleolithic and Middle Paleolithic periods. These objects were later revealed to be forgeries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grave goods</span> Items buried along with the body

Grave goods, in archaeology and anthropology, are items buried along with a body.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archaeological forgery</span> Manufacture of supposedly ancient items

Archaeological forgery is the manufacture of supposedly ancient items that are sold to the antiquities market and may even end up in the collections of museums. It is related to art forgery.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shroud of Turin</span> Cloth bearing the alleged image of Jesus

The Shroud of Turin, also known as the Holy Shroud, is a length of linen cloth that bears a faint image of the front and back of a man. It has been venerated for centuries, especially by members of the Catholic Church, as the actual burial shroud used to wrap the body of Jesus of Nazareth after his crucifixion, and upon which Jesus's bodily image is miraculously imprinted. The human image on the shroud can be discerned more clearly in a black and white photographic negative than in its natural sepia color, an effect discovered in 1898 by Secondo Pia, who produced the first photographs of the shroud. This negative image is associated with a popular Catholic devotion to the Holy Face of Jesus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michigan relics</span> American archeology hoax

The Michigan Relics are a series of alleged ancient artifacts that were "discovered" during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. They were presented by some to be evidence that people of an ancient Near Eastern culture had lived in North America and the U.S. state of Michigan, which, is known as pre-Columbian contact. Many scholars have determined that the artifacts are archaeological forgeries. The Michigan Relics are considered to be one of the most elaborate and extensive pseudoarchaeological hoaxes ever perpetrated in American history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ica stones</span> Decorated andesite stones found in Ica Province, Peru

The Ica stones are a collection of andesite stones from the Ica Province in Peru, known for their engraved motifs. Largely regarded to be modern hoaxes, the stones in some cases utilize art styles from various pre-Columbian Peruvian civilizations and often depict anachronistic scenes or objects, including dinosaurs and advanced technology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Archaeological Museum, Athens</span> National museum in Athens, Greece

The National Archaeological Museum in Athens houses some of the most important artifacts from a variety of archaeological locations around Greece from prehistory to late antiquity. It is considered one of the greatest museums in the world and contains the richest collection of Greek Antiquity artifacts worldwide. It is situated in the Exarcheia area in central Athens between Epirus Street, Bouboulinas Street and Tositsas Street while its entrance is on the Patission Street adjacent to the historical building of the Athens Polytechnic university.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coso artifact</span> Spark plug supposedly encased in a 500,000-year-old geode

The Coso artifact is an object falsely claimed by its discoverers to be a spark plug encased in a geode. Discovered on February 13, 1961, by Wallace Lane, Virginia Maxey, and Mike Mikesell while they were prospecting for geodes near the town of Olancha, California, it has long been claimed as an example of an out-of-place artifact. The artifact has been identified as a 1920s-era Champion spark plug encased in a concretion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Dawson</span> British archaeologist and fraudster (1864–1916)

Charles Dawson was a British amateur archaeologist who claimed to have made a number of archaeological and palaeontological discoveries that were later exposed as frauds. These forgeries included the Piltdown Man, a unique set of bones that he claimed to have found in 1912 in Sussex. Many technological methods such as fluorine testing indicate that this discovery was a hoax, and Dawson, the only one with the skill and knowledge to generate this forgery, was a major suspect.

The Antikythera wreck is a Roman-era shipwreck dating from the second quarter of the first century BC.

The Newark Holy Stones refer to a set of artifacts allegedly discovered by David Wyrick in 1860 within a cluster of ancient Indian burial mounds near Newark, Ohio, now believed to be a hoax. The set consists of the Keystone, a stone bowl, and the Decalogue with its sandstone box. They can be viewed at the Johnson-Humrickhouse Museum in Coshocton, Ohio. The site where the objects were found is known as the Newark Earthworks, one of the biggest collections from an ancient American Indian culture known as the Hopewell that existed from approximately 100 BC to AD 500.

The Tecaxic-Calixtlahuaca head is a terracotta head, probably originally part of a larger figurine, discovered in 1933 among pre-Columbian or just post-Columbian grave goods in the Tecaxic-Calixtlahuaca zone in the Toluca Valley, approximately 65 kilometers northwest of Mexico City.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quimbaya</span> Indigenous group in present-day Colombia

The Quimbaya (/kɪmbaɪa/) were a small, ancient indigenous group in present-day Colombia noted for their gold work characterized by technical accuracy and detailed designs. The majority of the gold work is made in tumbaga alloy, with 30% copper, which colours the pieces.

The Holly Oak Gorget or Holly Oak Pendant is an artifact made from a section of shell that is engraved with the image of an extinct woolly mammoth reportedly found in Holly Oak, Delaware and initially identified as an example of Paleoindian art. Purported to have been a gorget carved during the Pleistocene, this object is now widely believed to be an archaeological forgery.

The following outline is provided as an overview and topical guide to forgery:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quimbaya artifacts</span> Golden objects made by the Quimbaya culture, dated around 1000 CE

Quimbaya artifacts refer to a range of primarily ceramic and gold objects surviving from the Quimbaya civilisation, one of many pre-Columbian cultures of Colombia inhabiting the Middle Cauca River valley and southern Antioquian region of modern-day Colombia. The artifacts are believed to have originated during the Classical Quimbaya period 500 BC–600 AD.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nampa figurine</span> 1889 American archaeological hoax

The Nampa figurine is a 1.5-inch (38 mm) fired clay doll found near Nampa, Idaho, in 1889. The figurine has been dyed red, possibly due to iron oxide deposition, and depicts a female figure with jewelry and clothing. The artifact has been the subject of substantial controversy over its apparent age. While scholarly consensus today holds that the doll is a hoax, initial estimates of the artifact placed its age at 2 million years old, significantly outdating any other clay artifacts and humanity's arrival in the Americas.

References

  1. Benjamin B. Olshin (2019). Lost Knowledge: The Concept of Vanished Technologies and Other Human Histories. Brill. pp. 353–. ISBN   978-90-04-35272-8.
  2. 1 2 3 4 O'Hehir, Andrew (August 31, 2005). "Archaeology from the dark side". Salon.com. Retrieved 19 April 2010.
  3. R. Balasubramaniam (2001). "New Insights on the Corrosion Resistant Delhi Iron Pillar". In Rao, Ramachandra Patcha; Goswami, Nani Gopal (eds.). Metallurgy in India: a retrospective (PDF). India International Publisher. pp. 104–133.
  4. 1 2 Stromberg, P, and PV Heinrich (2004) The Coso Artifact Mystery from the Depths of Time? Archived 2007-12-14 at the Wayback Machine , Reports of the National Center for Science Education. 24(2):26–30 (March/April 2004) Retrieved March 8, 2014.
  5. "The Antikythera Mechanism Research Project Archived 2008-04-28 at the Wayback Machine ", The Antikythera Mechanism Research Project. Retrieved 2007-07-01 Quote: "The Antikythera Mechanism is now understood to be dedicated to astronomical phenomena and operates as a complex mechanical "computer" which tracks the cycles of the Solar System."
  6. Paphitis, Nicholas (December 1, 2006). "Experts: Fragments an Ancient Computer". The Washington Post . Athens, Greece. Imagine tossing a top-notch laptop into the sea, leaving scientists from a foreign culture to scratch their heads over its corroded remains centuries later. A Roman shipmaster inadvertently did something just like it 2,000 years ago off southern Greece, experts said late Thursday.
  7. "Vinland Archeology". Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History. Archived from the original on 2003-12-09. Retrieved 2011-08-24.
  8. "Bye, Columbus". Time . December 11, 1978. Archived from the original on October 27, 2007.
  9. J., Wilkie & Co. (1918). "New Zealand Journal of Science". Technology. 1. Retrieved 30 June 2021.
  10. Stevenson, Kylie (11 May 2019). "'It could change everything': coin found off northern Australia may be from pre-1400 Africa". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 11 May 2019.
  11. S. A. Wells. "American Drugs in Egyptian Mummies" . Retrieved 11 February 2024.
  12. 1 2 Taylor, R.E.; Bar-Yosef, Ofer (2014). Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeological Perspective (2nd ed.). Left Coast Press. pp. 165–168. ISBN   978-1-59874-590-0.
  13. "How did the Turin Shroud get its image?". BBC News. 2015-06-18. Retrieved 2024-06-16.
  14. Freer-Waters, Rachel A.; Jull, A. J. Timothy (2010). "Investigating a Dated Piece of the Shroud of Turin". Radiocarbon. 52 (4): 1521–1527. doi:10.1017/S0033822200056277. ISSN   0033-8222.
  15. Schafersman, Steven D. (14 March 2005). "A Skeptical Response to Studies on the Radiocarbon Sample from the Shroud of Turin by Raymond N. Rogers". llanoestacado.org. Archived from the original on 14 November 2015. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  16. Wilson, Ian (2010). The Shroud. London: Bantam Press. pp. 130–131. ISBN   978-0-593-06359-0.
  17. Gove, H. E. (1990). "Dating the Turin Shroud: An Assessment". Radiocarbon. 32 (1): 87–92. doi: 10.1017/S0033822200039990 .
  18. Ramsey, Christopher (March 2008). "The Shroud of Turin". Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit. Archived from the original on 25 April 2009. Retrieved 2024-08-24.
  19. Plating and Surface Finishing. vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 84–87. Von Handorf, D.E. (May 2002). "The Baghdad Battery—Myth or Reality?" (PDF). Platin & Surface Finishing. 89 (5): 84–87.
  20. Flatow, I (2012) Archaeologists Revisit Iraq. interview with Elizabeth Stone, Talk of the Nation, National Public Radio. Washington, DC.
  21. Keith Fitzpatrick-Matthews (26 December 2009). "The batteries of Babylon: evidence for ancient electricity?". Bad Archaeology. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
  22. Steiger, B. (1979) Worlds Before Our Own. New York, New York, Berkley Publishing Group. 236 pp. ISBN   978-1-933665-19-1
  23. Fitzpatrick-Matthews, K, and J Doeser (2007) Metallic vase from Dorchester, Massachusetts. Bad Archaeology.
  24. Sir David, B (1854) Queries and Statements concerning a Nail found imbedded in a Block of Sandstone obtained from Kingoodie (Mylnfield) Quarry, North Britain. Report of the Fourteenth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science vol. 51, John Murray London.
  25. Fitzpatrick-Matthews, K, and J Doeser (2007) A nail in Devonian sandstone from Kingoodie, Scotland. Bad Archaeology.
  26. anonymous (nd) The Mystery Stone. Archived 2010-09-14 at the Wayback Machine Museum Exhibits, New Hampshire Historical Society, Concord, New Hampshire.
  27. Klatell, JM (July 23, 2006). New England's 'Mystery Stone': New Hampshire Displays Unexplained Artifact 134 Years Later. Associated Press. Retrieved March 8, 2014.
  28. Colbert, Edwin H. (1936). "Was the Extinct Giraffe (Sivatherium) Known to the Early Sumerians?". American Anthropologist. 38 (4): 605–608. doi: 10.1525/aa.1936.38.4.02a00100 .
  29. Naish, D. (2007) What happened with that Sumerian 'sivathere' figurine after Colbert's paper of 1936? Well, a lot. Tetrapod Zoology.
  30. Müller-Karpe, Michael (1985). "Antlers of the Stag Rein Ring from Kish". Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 44: 57–58. doi:10.1086/373105. S2CID   161093625.
  31. Hristov, RH, and S. Genoves (2001) Tecaxic-Calixtlahuaca. Dept. of Anthropology at the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
  32. Schaaf, P and GA Wagner (1991) Comments on 'Mesoamerican Evidence of Pre-Columbian Transoceanic Contacts,' by Hristov and Genovés. Ancient Mesoamerica. 10:207–213.
  33. Darling, David. "paleocontact hypothesis". The Encyclopedia of Science. Retrieved 20 January 2013.
  34. "Debunking the Dendera "Light Bulb"". 3 October 2019.
  35. "Awful Archaeology Ep. 5: The Dendera Light". YouTube .
  36. Search for Hidden Light in the Pyramids
  37. "The Tomb of Sabu and The Tri-lobed "Schist" Bowl". www.bibliotecapleyades.net. Retrieved 2022-12-03.
  38. Grewe, Klaus. Der Eiserne Mann im Kottenforst. Rheinlandverlag, Cologne, 1978.
  39. "IIT team solves the pillar mystery". The Times of India. 2005.
  40. Cole, J.R. (Winter 1985). "If I Had a Hammer". Creation Evolution Journal. 5 (15). National Center for Science Education Inc.: 46–47. One of his principal pieces of evidence for human contemporaneity with supposedly ancient geological strata is an iron hammer with a wooden handle found near London, Texas by others in the 1930s in an "Ordovician" stone concretion..."(Baugh, 1983b).
  41. "The "Meister Print" An Alleged Human Sandal Print from Utah". TalkOrigins. Retrieved 4 May 2019.
  42. Turner, Derek D.; Turner, Michelle I. (2021). ""I'm not saying it was aliens": an archaeological and philosophical analysis of a conspiracy theory". In Killin, Anton; Allen-Hermanson, Sean (eds.). Explorations in Archaeology and Philosophy. Springer. pp. 7–24. ISBN   978-3-030-61051-7.
  43. McIntosh, Gregory C. (2000). The Piri Reis Map of 1513. University of Georgia Press. p. 230.
  44. Dutch, Steven. "The Piri Reis Map". Archived from the original on 2013-08-13. Retrieved 2013-08-16.
  45. Brodie, Neil; Kersel, Morag M.; Tubb, Kathryn Walker (2006-08-01), "The Plunder of the Ulúa Valley, Honduras, and a Market Analysis For Its Antiquities", Archaeology, Cultural Heritage, and the Antiquities Trade, University Press of Florida, pp. 147–172, doi:10.5744/florida/9780813029726.003.0008, ISBN   9780813029726 , retrieved 2022-04-20
  46. Desmond, Kevin (20 September 2018). Electric Airplanes and Drones: A History. McFarland. p. 5. ISBN   978-1-4766-6961-8 . Retrieved 30 April 2022.
  47. Weintraub, Pamela (1985). Omni's Catalog of the Bizarre. Doubleday. p. 24. ISBN   9780385192613.
  48. Dunning, Brian (3 February 2015). "Skeptoid #452: The Stone Spheres of Costa Rica". Skeptoid .
  49. Joffe, Alex (24 January 2018). "ANE TODAY – 201609 – Ask a Near Eastern Professional: How the Sumerians Got to Peru - American Society of Overseas Research (ASOR)". American Society of Overseas Research . Retrieved 3 May 2024.
  50. Stillman, B (1820) Curious Geological Facts: The American Journal of Science. v. 2, no. 1, pp. 144–146. (November 1820). Internet Archive copy archived on May 27, 2011.
  51. Fitzpatrick-Matthews, K (2007) Tools in rock at Aix-en-Provence . Archived from the original on November 16, 2016.
  52. Anonymous (2002) Mysterious Pipes Left by 'ET' Reported from Qinghai. People's Daily Online, Beijing, China. Retrieved March 8, 2014.
  53. Anonymous (2002) Chinese Scientists to Head for Suspected ET Relics. People's Daily Online, Beijing, China. Retrieved March 8, 2014.
  54. Dunning, Brian. "Skeptoid #181: The Baigong Pipes". Skeptoid . Retrieved March 8, 2014.
  55. Brookesmith, P (2004) The Eltanin Enigma. Archived 2013-04-03 at the Wayback Machine Fortean Times. (May 2004). Retrieved March 8, 2014.
  56. Heezen, BC, and CD Hollister (1971) The Face of the Deep. Oxford University Press, New York. 659 pp. ISBN   0-19-501277-1
  57. Hoagland, Richard C. (1996). The Monuments of Mars: A City on the Edge of Forever (4th ed.). Berkeley: Frog, Ltd. p. 5. ISBN   978-1-883319-30-4.
  58. Cairncross, B (1988) "Cosmic cannonballs" a rational explanation: The South African Lapidary Magazine. v. 30, no. 1, pp. 4–6.
  59. Heinrich, PV (1997) Mystery spheres: National Center for Science Education Reports. v. 17, no. 1, p. 34. (January/February 1997)
  60. Bachelard, Michael (27 July 2013). "Digging for the truth at controversial megalithic site. Sydney Morning Herald, 27 July 2013". www.smh.com.au. Retrieved 25 November 2022.
  61. Wichmann, Wolf (2003-03-29). "Zeugnis einer untergegangenen Hochkultur Asiens oder einfach nur ein Felsklotz im Meer?: Das Yonaguni-Monument". Spiegel Online (in German). Retrieved 2019-06-16.
  62. Peet, Preston (2013). Disinformation Guide to Ancient Aliens, Lost Civilizations, Astonishing Archaeology & Hidden History. Red Wheel Weiser. ISBN   978-1938875038.
  63. "Noah's Ark Found in Turkey?". 2010-04-29. Archived from the original on 2010-04-29. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  64. Green, Lauren (2015-03-26). "Noah's Ark Hoax Claim Doesn't Deter Believers". Fox News. Retrieved 2023-12-05.
  65. RealitateaTV (2014) "Specialist despre obiectul preistoric neidentificat din depozitele muzeului de istorie: 'aparţine unui robot primitiv'" Archived 2018-07-27 at the Wayback Machine , RealitateaTV.net.
  66. Hilblairious (2014) "Aluminum, Aliens (1): What "THEY" left Behind in Aiud", Hilblairious.blogspot.ca.
  67. Coulam, NJ, and AR Schroedl (1995) The Keystone azurite mine in southeastern Utah. Utah Archaeology. 8(1): 1–12.
  68. Kuban, GJ, (2005) "Moab Man" – "Malachite Man". The Paluxy Dinosaur/"Man Track" Controversy. Retrieved March 8, 2014.
  69. Whipkey, Rockey (October 2012). "How deep do we dig? The pros and cons of a controversial ceramic figurine" (PDF). Pleistocene Coalition News. 4 (3).
  70. Wright, George Frederick (1912). Origin and Antiquity of Man. Bibliotheca sacra Company. pp. 268–290.
  71. Lippard, Jim (1989). "Out-of-Order Human Artifacts" (PDF). Creation/Evolution (25): 25.
  72. Sagan, Carl; Jerome Agel (2000). Carl Sagan's Cosmic Connection. Cambridge University Press. p. 206. ISBN   0-521-78303-8.
  73. Evon, Dan (4 January 2016). "FALSE: 800-Year-Old Alien Cellphone Found". snopes. Retrieved 3 January 2017.
  74. Isaak, M. (2007). The Counter-Creationism Handbook. University of California Press. p. 362. ISBN   978-0520249264.
  75. Taylor, R. E.; Payen, Louis A.; Slota, Peter J. Jr (April 1992). "The Age of the Calaveras Skull: Dating the "Piltdown Man" of the New World". American Antiquity. 57 (2): 269–275. doi:10.2307/280732. JSTOR   280732. S2CID   162187935.
  76. "An Alleged Revelation by Hull, the Giant Maker". Buffalo Morning Express. 1869-12-13. p. 2. Retrieved 2023-01-25.
  77. Rose, Mark (November–December 2005). "When Giants Roamed the Earth". Archeology. 58 (6). Archaeological Institute of America. Retrieved September 11, 2020.
  78. Craddock, Paul (2009). Scientific Investigation of Copies, Fakes and Forgeries. Oxford, UK and Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann. p. 415. ISBN   978-0750642057. OCLC   127107601.
  79. "Egyptologist debunks new claims about 'Gosford glyphs'". ABC News. 14 December 2012. Retrieved 7 December 2014.
  80. "Jurassic library - The Ica Stones | Articles | Features | Fortean Times UK". 2008-08-27. Archived from the original on 2008-08-27. Retrieved 2022-11-13.
  81. "Oda Shizuo's 1985 Criticisms". www.t-net.ne.jp. Retrieved 2022-12-03.
  82. "Calcite Weathering and the Age of the Kensington Rune Stone Inscription (Lightning Post)". Andy White Anthropology. Retrieved 24 May 2019.
  83. Feder (2011, pp. 159-62).
  84. Ashurst-McGee, Mark (2001). "Mormonism's Encounter with the Michigan Relics". BYU Studies. 40 (3): 178.
  85. Lepper, Bradley (12 December 2014). "CONCLUSIVE PROOF THAT THE NEWARK DECALOGUE STONE IS A FORGERY (AND NOT A VERY GOOD ONE AT THAT)". Ohio History Connection. Retrieved 31 January 2023.
  86. End as a Man. Time Magazine 30 Nov 1953 Archived 30 October 2010 at the Wayback Machine retrieved 11 November 2010
  87. Thompson, Raymond H. (2004). "Glimpses of the Young Emil Haury". Journal of the Southwest. 46 (1).