Healthcare is a major issue for people in custody in Australia. People in prison have substantially more complex physical and mental health care needs than the general population, and have significantly higher rates of both diagnosed and undiagnosed conditions. Despite their higher needs for healthcare, people in prison have significantly less access to healthcare in custody compared to the general Australian population.
There are no national standards for healthcare in Australian prisons. Prisoners in all jurisdictions, however, are prevented from accessing the Medicare universal health care system or the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), which contributes to the lack of healthcare in custody as many prisons are unable to afford certain services and medications without Medicare or PBS rebates. Other issues inhibiting healthcare provision in custody include limited access to the National Disability Insurance Scheme, no access to needle and syringe programs, and issues with record keeping.
There are no national standards for healthcare in Australian prisons. [1] There are eight prison systems in Australia, one for each internal state and territory. All jurisdictions do not provide access to the Medicare universal health care system. In the absence of Medicare, each jurisdiction in Australia provides healthcare in custody differently through a variety of models, including services being provided by the public sector, outsourced to private providers, or through public-private partnerships. [2] While prisoners do receive free healthcare, the range of services and medications are significantly lower than those available to the general community. [3]
Prisoners on average are less healthy and have higher rates of chronic illnesses, infectious diseases, acquired brain injuries and drug use than the general community. [4] [5] People entering prison typically come from extremely disadvantaged backgrounds, and may have under-utilised health care prior to entering custody, [6] as health was viewed as a lower priority than issues including housing, employment, caring obligations or drug addiction. [5] For example, 43% of people entering prison were homeless, making prison entrants about 100 times more likely to be homeless than other Australians. [5]
Despite their higher health needs, there is a lower level of health care available in prison than in the general community. [3] [7] However, for people in prison who underuse health services prior to their incarceration, prison can provide an opportunity to obtain treatment and improve health; 26% of people released from prison report being diagnosed with a previously unknown health condition while in custody. [5] Among people being released from prison, approximately 53% reported their health improved in custody, 22% said it stayed the same and 25% said it deteriorated. [5] While many surveyed people in prison rate the health care they receive as better than what they received in the community, these raw statistics have been accused of bias, as they do not take into consideration the lack of healthcare access many people had before entering prison. [8]
Most chronic health conditions are more prevalent in prison entrants than the general community, though some conditions more associated with older people, such as arthritis and osteoporosis, are much less common in custody. This is attributed to the average age in prison being much lower than the general population. [5] Communicable diseases are also more prevalent, partly due to the higher levels of at-risk behaviours associated with people entering the prison system, such as drug use and unsafe sex. While only 18% of Australians have a disability, 39% of prisoners have a disability. [5]
Nine out of ten people incarcerated in Australian prisons require dental treatment. Furthermore, 6% of the general Australian community between the age of 15 and 64 required dental extraction, whereas 28% of prison inmates between the age of 15 and 64 required an extraction. [9] Some prisons do not offer dental services at all. [10] While prisoners report positive interactions with some health professionals in prison, such as optometrists, reports about dental professionals are often negative, with complaints that dentists focus on extracting teeth, rather than doing fillings, [11] and do not provide preventative services. [12] Prisoners report that access to dental services is a significant concern, and also report that the typical treatments for toothache in prison, which is being given ibuprofen or paracetamol by nurses, are ineffective. [13]
After their release, people wth poor health outcomes from their imprisonments place significant strain on themselves, the health system, and the general community. [4] Accordingly, improving the health of people in prison benefits the entire population. [5]
People with mental health conditions, particularly severe ones, are over-represented in Australian prisons. In Australia, rates of self-harm in prison occur at 3-8 times the rate of the general Australian community, [14] and around 40% of people in custody report having been diagnosed with a mental health disorder, though the actual number of mental health disorders is estimated to be 74% due to both undiagnosed conditions, [7] and underreporting due to the consequences of disclosing such conditions. [1] [15] The typical response to reporting depression, self-harm or serious mental health issues in custody is to place the prisoner in solitary confinement under protective grounds. [3] [16] This practice exacerbates mental health conditions and rehabilitation prospects, and has been criticised for years, though remains common due to the absence of more appropriate supports. Mental health services offered in prison are widely considered to be inadequate, and prisoners typically have little to no access to ongoing counselling services in custody. [1] [3] [10] Where psychological services do exist, they often focus on risk management services, rather than providing ongoing therapy. [17]
As of 2023, there are no guidelines in Australia for the number of mental health staff who should be working in prisons. Accordingly, the guidelines in the United Kingdom, which recommend one full-time mental health worker for every 50 prisoners, are often cited in relation to Australian prisons. [18] [19] Only the Australian Capital Territory, the jurisdiction with the fewest prisoners in the country, meets this recommendation. In Western Australia, there are less than three full-time psychologists for the state's 17 prisons, giving a ratio of one psychologist per 2066 people, compared to a rate of one per 1031 people in the general population in that State. [3]
There are many issues contributing to health care access being more difficult in prison than in the community. Prisoners have no choice of when they can access medical services in custody, face a restricted choice of healthcare providers, and experience longer wait times for services. [3] Only 46% of surveyed prisoners in Australia reported they could easily see a doctor when required. Transport to medical appointments is also significantly difficult, as consultations may require being transferred to another prison. If the location of that prison would prohibit the ability of family to visit, or is perceived as more dangerous, people in custody might choose to forego a medical appointment. [5] There are almost no options to pay for better healthcare in prison. Officially, prisoners can apply for approval to be taken to an external medical practitioner, though they must pay the costs of their transport and escort by prison guards. The average cost of transport and escort to an external medical practitioner from a New South Wales (NSW) prison is $1,060 per trip. [7]
One of the main barriers to healthcare in custody is that prison guards, who rarely have tertiary medical qualifications, act as the gatekeepers for health requests. Guards may not book appointments if they do not believe conditions are serious enough, and also have the authority to over-ride recommendations from health professionals. A 2024 report into prison healthcare in Australia stated that this power is unique to prison environments, as prisoners are reliant for their healthcare from a person who is not necessarily obligated to act in their best interest. Needing to disclose confidential reasons for a medical appointment to a prison guard may discourage people from trying to make appointments in the first place. [1] Accessing healthcare in custody also requires a more advanced level of health literacy than is needed in the community, which may produce greater difficulties in both asking for and receiving healthcare. [1]
Prisoners on remand in Australia may not be eligible for certain healthcare treatments, such as drug and alcohol programs, and may also not be eligible for continuity of care programs if they are released without conviction. [1] The timing surrounding release of prisoners from remand is often uncertain, leading to difficulties in preparing discharge reports. [1] [5]
Prisoners in Australia have never had access to Medicare, as a result of Federal Government cost-cutting legislation introduced in 1976, which removed Medicare access from anyone receiving healthcare under an arrangement with a State or the Commonwealth. Prisoners do not technically lose their Medicare eligibility, and can access Medicare benefits while on day release or parole. However, prison systems have long believed the relevant legislation forbids them for applying for Medicare benefits. While the Medicare exclusion in prisons was never intended to be a punitive measure, as a result of the exclusion, many health services cannot be provided as they are considered too expensive to provide without Medicare rebates, [1] [3] [20] or because there is no non-Medicare equivalent service available. [21] [22] Examples of unavailable services for which there is no non-Medicare equivalent include screening children in custody for fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, [22] and Medicare Item 715, the Indigenous Health Assessment. [20] [21] This test was established as a proactive treatment as Indigenous Australians have been identified as having higher rates of many chronic illnesses. The Coronial Inquest into several deaths in custody have noted the lack of Item 715 in prison, and have called for the trial of Medicare services in prisons. [21] [23]
Government reports have been calling for the introduction of Medicare in prisons since at least 1985. [3] Other calls for the introduction of Medicare into prisons have come from the Australian Medical Association, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, the Royal Commission into the Protection and Detention of Children in the Northern Territory, [3] the Law Council of Australia, [24] and Queensland Health. [25] There is compelling evidence that introducing Medicare into prisons would have a positive return on investment, as prisoners who receive adequate healthcare are less likely to reoffend, and the cost of re-incarceration is significantly more expensive than the cost of providing healthcare. [3]
Prisoners do not have access to over-the-counter medical items and medications regularly taken for granted in the general community, and are required to see nurses to obtain basic items such as adhesive bandages, skin creams and paracetamol. [26] Some medications that are available over-the-counter in the community may only be available in prison via prescriptions. [27] Prisoners are often not allowed to store their medication in the cells due to security concerns, [27] and also can only obtain their medication at certain times. [28] A 2019 survey at the Alexander Maconochie Centre found that 51% or prisoners reported that it was difficult to get over-the-counter medication when needed, and 58% reported that medication was either never or rarely provided in a timely manner. [28]
As prisoners do not have access to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), prisons instead prescribe from smaller approved lists of medications. Accordingly, people entering custody may have to change their existing prescribed medications to alternatives. [27] [29] Prisoners are not allowed to take any existing medications into prison. All medications will be confiscated upon entering prisons, and the medications or equivalents can instead be applied for when a prisoner has a medical appointment. [30] This can take weeks after entering the prison system. [31] Continuity of mental health medications from the community into prisons is considered to be particularly poor, [27] and the disruption of medications upon arriving in prison is a frequent complaint from prisoners. [28] [32] Prisons purchase medications through contract agreements, which can cause delays as to when certain medications become available. For example, dulaglutide became available on the PBS in 2018, but did not become available in NSW prisons until 2021. [33]
Medical professional whistleblowers working in prisons have reported grossly inadequate access to medications, including delays in chemotherapy for several weeks and "potentially illegal" management of medications. [34] Prisoners themselves report being prescribed the wrong medication or unsuitable medication, and being subjected to punishment for refusing to take medication, even if they report being allergic to it. [35] Medications that produce a sedative effect are over-prescribed in prison as they moderate behaviour, rather than for any healthcare reasons. [1]
Prisoners also have restricted access to the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), as the relevant legislation limits the number of services that can be provided to people in prison and explicitly forbids using NDIS for day-to-day support. Typically, only transitional support services can be accessed. [36] It is considered "exceedingly difficult" to apply for NDIS funding in prison. [37] A 2018 investigation by the Victorian Ombudsmen reported on a case of a women held in solitary confinement for 18 months who was in a paradoxical situation as the agency responsible for NDIS refused to give her a plan until she had a release date, but the prison refused to give her a release date until she had an NDIS plan. [37] The limited NDIS access exacerbates existing deficits with providing treatment to people with disabilities in custody, and the lack of treatment available is considered to be a factor in increasing reoffending. [38] Difficulty accessing appropriate disability services is an issue frequently raised by prisoners. [1]
Hepatitis C it is most frequently transmitted in prison by sharing needles. [39] No Australian jurisdiction provides prisoners with a needle and syringe program, which has been attributed to causing a Hepatitis C crisis in prisons. [40] It is estimated that between 23 and 47% of men in prison have Hepatitis C, and over 70% of women in prison; 70% of people who inject drugs in Australian prisons report sharing needles. A 2015 inquiry by the Parliament of Australia into Hepatitis C found there was strong evidence and support for the introduction of needle exchange programs in prisons from health professionals. [41] A 2022 report by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare on the health on people in prison stated that needle and syringe exchange programs are effective, and that in countries where these programs have been introduced into prisons there has been a decrease in blood-borne virus transmissions, and no major negative consequences. [5]
Many prison records are not kept electronically, and are still paper-based. Both prisoners and prison staff report that when people are transferred to different prisons, their paper medical records can be lost. [13] [42] In cases where electronic records are created, deficits have still been reported which do not allow all information from paper records to be recorded electronically. [42] A Coronial Inquest found that the 2018 death of Mottijah Shillingsworth, an Indigenous man in prison who died from a preventable ear infection, was impacted by the lack of electronic records, which was a factor in his initial misdiagnosis. [21] Coronial Inquests into deaths in custody have found that medical records in prison are incomplete, inaccurate, misleading and under-accessed by medical staff. [43]
There is limited sharing of information of health records in prisons. In NSW, there are five information systems for prison health records, including a mix of electronic and paper records. As of 2022, the database for dental treatment is not linked to the main medical treatment system, meaning it is difficult for regular health staff to assess, for example, if a patient who has an infection resulting from a dental appointment requires treatment. [44] There is also no automatic alert within the systems to let medical staff know that a patient has been moved to another prison. Accordingly, staff at a prison a patient has been transferred to may be unaware of existing appointments. [44] The lack of integrated electronic record systems increases the amount of time and resources spent obtaining information regarding heath records. [13]
Many health records in prison are not linked with the My Health Record system used by the general public, nor are prisons able to access records from this system, which are available instantly to health practitioners in the community. Records from the community are instead verified by prison staff manually, a process that can take several days, and for which there are no mandated timeframes from obtaining information. [44] Prisoners are not given copies of some health records upon release, and instead must apply for them through Freedom of information. [45] As people leaving custody do not have easy access to their prison medical records, some medical tests and assessments completed in prison are often redone in the community, as this can be less time-consuming than applying for records. This results in increased costs to taxpayers and additional strain on public healthcare systems. [33] Tests are also sometimes repeated in prison due to paper records being lost. [1] Due to the lack of integration with the broader health system, initial health assessments completed in prison rely heavily on prisoners both understanding and reporting their health conditions and medications, rather than connections with external clinicians in the community. This requires a high level of health literacy that is not often common among prisoners. [1]
The lack of healthcare access in custody is considered to be in violation of several binding United Nations treaties which Australia has ratified. For example, the lack of Medicare access is considered to violate Article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and Article 15 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). It is also considered to be violating non-binding resolutions including Article 24 of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and Rule 24(I) of the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners. [3] [17] Likewise, excluding prisoners from full NDIS access is inconsistent with the CRPD. [38] Individual cases have also been considered to have violated the CRPD. [37]
It has been legally held that prisoners retain all civil rights not expressly taken away by imprisonment itself, meaning there is no legal reasoning to exclude prisoners from healthcare. [17] However, the lack of efficient ways to complain about healthcare issues in custody is often raised by prisoners. Complaining about healthcare in prison may lead to further restricted access or repercussions, as opposed to the intended outcome of improving services. Furthermore, visits from prison advocates are typically held in open areas, where disclosure may be heard by staff, and may lead to repercussions. [1] Prisoners also have limited legal options to improve their healthcare access. Litigating against prisons or State or Territory governments regarding the lack of Medicare access is unable to be effective, as the restriction is caused by federal legislation. [3] There are no federal prisons in Australia, only those run by state and territory governments, and the Australian Human Rights Commission will only allow complaints against federal organisations. Neither the High Court of Australia nor the Federal Court of Australia has the jurisdiction to hear human rights complaints regarding ICCPR violations in prisons. It has also been held that prisoners in Victoria do not have the right to legally challenge violations of the Corrections Act 1986, which governs prisons and prisoners’ rights in that state. The act technically provides rights for prisoners, but provides no ways to challenge violations of those rights. [16]
In the United States, Medicaid is a government program that provides health insurance for adults and children with limited income and resources. The program is partially funded and primarily managed by state governments, which also have wide latitude in determining eligibility and benefits, but the federal government sets baseline standards for state Medicaid programs and provides a significant portion of their funding. States are not required to participate in the program, although all have since 1982.
Medicare is an unofficial designation used to refer to the publicly funded single-payer healthcare system of Canada. Canada's health care system consists of 13 provincial and territorial health insurance plans, which provide universal healthcare coverage to Canadian citizens, permanent residents, and depending on the province or territory, certain temporary residents. The systems are individually administered on a provincial or territorial basis, within guidelines set by the federal government. The formal terminology for the insurance system is provided by the Canada Health Act and the health insurance legislation of the individual provinces and territories.
Medicare is the publicly funded universal health care insurance scheme in Australia operated by the nation's social security agency, Services Australia. The scheme either partially or fully covers the cost of most health care, with services being delivered by state and territory governments or private enterprises. All Australian citizens and permanent residents are eligible to enrol in Medicare, as well as international visitors from 11 countries that have reciprocal agreements for medically necessary treatment.
Healthcare in Canada is delivered through the provincial and territorial systems of publicly funded health care, informally called Medicare. It is guided by the provisions of the Canada Health Act of 1984, and is universal. The 2002 Royal Commission, known as the Romanow Report, revealed that Canadians consider universal access to publicly funded health services as a "fundamental value that ensures national health care insurance for everyone wherever they live in the country".
The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is the component of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) led by the Under Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Health that implements the healthcare program of the VA through a nationalized healthcare service in the United States, providing healthcare and healthcare-adjacent services to veterans through the administration and operation of 146 VA Medical Centers (VAMC) with integrated outpatient clinics, 772 Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOC), and 134 VA Community Living Centers Programs. It is the largest division in the department, and second largest in the entire federal government, employing over 350,000 employees. All VA hospitals, clinics and medical centers are owned by and operated by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and all of the staff employed in VA hospitals are federal employees. Because of this, veterans that qualify for VHA healthcare do not pay premiums or deductibles for their healthcare but may have to make copayments depending on the medical procedure. VHA is not a part of the US Department of Defense Military Health System.
Health care in Australia operates under a shared public-private model underpinned by the Medicare system, the national single-payer funding model. State and territory governments operate public health facilities where eligible patients receive care free of charge. Primary health services, such as GP clinics, are privately owned in most situations, but attract Medicare rebates. Australian citizens, permanent residents, and some visitors and visa holders are eligible for health services under the Medicare system. Individuals are encouraged through tax surcharges to purchase health insurance to cover services offered in the private sector, and further fund health care.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) people face difficulties in prison such as increased vulnerability to sexual assault, other kinds of violence, and trouble accessing necessary medical care. While much of the available data on LGBTQ inmates comes from the United States, Amnesty International maintains records of known incidents internationally in which LGBTQ prisoners and those perceived to be lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender have suffered torture, ill-treatment and violence See Homelessness among LGBT youth in the United States, and LGBT youth vulnerability.
In the United States, healthcare is largely provided by private sector healthcare facilities, and paid for by a combination of public programs, private insurance, and out-of-pocket payments. The U.S. is the only developed country without a system of universal healthcare, and a significant proportion of its population lacks health insurance. The United States spends more on healthcare than any other country, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of GDP; however, this expenditure does not necessarily translate into better overall health outcomes compared to other developed nations. Coverage varies widely across the population, with certain groups, such as the elderly and low-income individuals, receiving more comprehensive care through government programs such as Medicaid and Medicare.
Prison healthcare is the medical specialty in which healthcare providers care for people in prisons and jails. Prison healthcare is a relatively new specialty that developed alongside the adaption of prisons into modern disciplinary institutions. Enclosed prison populations are particularly vulnerable to infectious diseases, including arthritis, asthma, hypertension, cervical cancer, hepatitis, tuberculosis, AIDS, and HIV, and mental health issues, such as Depression, mania, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder. These conditions link prison healthcare to issues of public health, preventive healthcare, and hygiene. Prisoner dependency on provided healthcare raises unique problems in medical ethics.
Ableism is discrimination and social prejudice against people with physical or mental disabilities. Ableism characterizes people as they are defined by their disabilities and it also classifies disabled people as people who are inferior to non-disabled people. On this basis, people are assigned or denied certain perceived abilities, skills, or character orientations.
Government-guaranteed health care for all citizens of a country, often called universal health care, is a broad concept that has been implemented in several ways. The common denominator for all such programs is some form of government action aimed at broadly extending access to health care and setting minimum standards. Most implement universal health care through legislation, regulation, and taxation. Legislation and regulation direct what care must be provided, to whom, and on what basis.
The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is a scheme of the Australian Government that funds reasonable and necessary supports associated with significant and permanent disability for people under 65 years old. The scheme was first introduced in 2013 following the "Make It Real" community campaign and advocacy from disability groups. The scheme is administered by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) as part of the Department of Social Services and overseen by the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission.
Four million people in Australia (18.5%) reported having a disability in 2009, according to the results of the Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers. Males and females were similarly affected by disability.
The incarceration of women in the United States refers to the imprisonment of women in both prisons and jails in the United States. There are approximately 219,000 incarcerated women in the US according to a November 2018 report by the Prison Policy Initiative, and the rate of incarceration of women in the United States is at a historic and global high, with 133 women in correctional facilities per every 100,000 female citizens. The United States is home to just 4% of the world's female population, yet the US is responsible for 33% of the entire world's incarcerated female population. The steep rise in the population of incarcerated women in the US is linked to the complex history of the war on drugs and the US's prison–industrial complex, which lead to mass incarceration among many demographics, but had particularly dramatic impacts on women and especially women of color. However, women made up only 10.4% of the US prison and jail population, as of 2015.
The Ghana Statistical Service reports from their 2021 census indicate that approximately eight percent of the Ghanaian population experience some form of disability, with a higher prevalence among females (8.8%) than males (6.7%). Disabilities are more common in rural areas (9.5%) compared to urban areas (6.5%). Among the six domains of disability, difficulty in seeing is the most widespread, affecting four percent of the population, while difficulty in communicating is the least common, affecting one percent. Disability issues in Ghana have evolved from a human rights concern to a developmental issue due to Ghana's high poverty rate.
Wellpath, formerly known as Correct Care Solutions is a healthcare company based in Nashville, Tennessee, U.S. and "one of the nation’s largest for-profit healthcare providers for prisoners." The company was founded in 2003 by Jerry Boyle. Currently, Wellpath is owned by private equity firm H.I.G. Capital and was formerly co-owned by Audax Group and Frazier Healthcare Partners. Wellpath's facilities exist in both the United States and Australia. Currently, there are 550 centers in 36 states. Their facilities treat around 300,000 patients per day. It operates the Florida Civil Commitment Center in Arcadia, Florida. Wellpath and CCS have been sued more than 1300 times for inadequate care according to a story in the Augusta Chronicle on January 12, 2019.
Criminal justice reform seeks to address structural issues in criminal justice systems such as racial profiling, police brutality, overcriminalization, mass incarceration, and recidivism. Criminal justice reform can take place at any point where the criminal justice system intervenes in citizens’ lives, including lawmaking, policing, and sentencing.
Correctional nursing or forensic nursing is nursing as it relates to prisoners. Nurses are required in prisons, jails, and detention centers; their job is to provide physical and mental healthcare for detainees and inmates. In these correctional settings, nurses are the primary healthcare providers. These nurses also work with crime victims and assist in expert witness testimonies, and are involved in a variety of legal cases, including paternity disputes and workplace injuries.
My Health Record (MHR) is the national digital health record platform for Australia, and is managed by the Australian Digital Health Agency. It was originally established as the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR), a shared electronic health summary set up by the Australian government with implementation overseen by the National Electronic Health Transition Authority (NEHTA). The purpose of the MHR is to provide a secure electronic summary of people's medical history which will eventually include information such as current medications, adverse drug reactions, allergies and immunisation history in an easily accessible format. This MHR is stored in a network of connected systems with the ability to improve the sharing of information amongst health care providers to improve patient outcomes no matter where in Australia a patient presents for treatment. PCEHR was an opt-in system with a unique individual healthcare identifier (IHI) being assigned to participants and the option of masking and limiting information available for viewing controlled by the patient or a nominated representative; MHR uses an opt-out system.
The Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association (AHHA), founded in 1946, is the representative body for the public hospital sector in Australia. It is one of 23 bodies funded from the government's Health Peaks and Advisory Bodies Program.