Research Works Act

Last updated
Research Works Act
Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg
Long title"To ensure the continued publication and integrity of peer-reviewed research works by the private sector." —H.R. 3699 [1]
Legislative history

The Research Works Act, 102 H.R. 3699, was a bill that was introduced in the United States House of Representatives at the 112th United States Congress on December 16, 2011, by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA) and co-sponsored by Carolyn B. Maloney (D-NY). [2] The bill contained provisions to prohibit open-access mandates for federally funded research [3] and effectively revert [4] the United States' National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy, [5] which requires taxpayer-funded research to be freely accessible online. [6] If enacted, it would have also severely restricted the sharing of scientific data. [7] The bill was referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, [8] of which Issa is the chair. [9] Similar bills were introduced in 2008 [10] and 2009 [11] but have not been enacted since. [1]

Contents

On February 27, 2012, Elsevier, a major publisher, announced that it was withdrawing support for the Act. [12] Later that day, Issa and Maloney issued a statement saying that they would not push for legislative action on the bill. [13]

Reception

The bill was supported by the Association of American Publishers (AAP) [14] and the Copyright Alliance. [15]

The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, [3] the Alliance for Taxpayer Access, [16] the American Library Association, [4] the International Society for Computational Biology, [17] the Confederation of Open Access Repositories [18] and prominent open science and open access advocates criticized the Research Works Act, [19] [20] [21] [22] some of them urging scholarly societies to resign from the AAP because of its support for the bill. [23] [24] Several AAP members, including MIT Press, Rockefeller University Press, Nature Publishing Group, American Association for the Advancement of Science stated their opposition to the bill but signaled no intention to leave the association. [25] Other AAP members stated their opposition to the bill [26] as did the Association of American Universities (AAU) and the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities. [27] Several public health groups opposed the bill. [28]

Opponents stressed particularly the effects on public availability of biomedical research results, such as those funded by NIH grants, submitting that under the bill "taxpayers who already paid for the research would have to pay again to read the results". [29] Mike Taylor from the University of Bristol said that the bill's denial of access to scientific research would cause "preventable deaths in developing countries" and "an incalculable loss to science", and said Representatives Issa and Maloney were motivated by multiple donations they had received from the academic publisher Elsevier. [30]

An online petition – The Cost of Knowledge – inspired by British mathematician and Fields medalist Timothy Gowers to raise awareness of the bill, to call for lower prices for journals and to promote increased open access to information, was signed by more than 10,000 scholars. [31] Signatories vowed to withhold their support from Elsevier journals as editors, reviewers or authors "unless they radically change how they operate". On February 27, 2012, Elsevier announced its withdrawal of support for the bill, citing concerns from journal authors, editors, and reviewers. [32] While participants in the boycott celebrated the dropping of support for the Research Works Act, [33] Elsevier denied that their action was a result of the boycott and stated that they took this action at the request of those researchers who did not participate in the boycott. [34]

The Research Works Act followed other attempts to challenge institutional open-access mandates in the US. On September 9, 2008, an earlier bill aimed at reversing the NIH's Public Access Policy – the Fair Copyright in Research Works Act, or Conyers Bill – was introduced as 110 H. R. 6845 in the House of Representatives at the 110th United States Congress by U.S Representative John Conyers (D-MI), with three cosponsors. [35] It was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, to which Conyers delivered an introduction on September 10, 2008. [36] After the start of the 111th United States Congress, Conyers and six-cosponsors reintroduced the bill to the House of Representatives as 111 H. R. 801 on February 3, 2009. [37] It was on the same day referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary and on March 16 to the Subcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy. [38]

On the other hand, the Federal Research Public Access Act proposed to expand the open public access mandate to research funded by eleven U.S. federal agencies. Originally introduced to the Senate in 2006 by John Cornyn (R-TX) with two cosponsors, [39] it was reintroduced in 2009 by Lieberman, co-sponsored by Cornyn, [40] and again in 2012. [41] These bills proposed requiring that those eleven agencies with research expenditures over $100 million create online repositories of journal articles of the research completed by that agency and make them publicly available without charge within six months after it has been published in a peer-reviewed journal. [42] On February 22, 2013 the Obama administration issued a similar policy memorandum, directing Federal agencies with more than $100 million in annual research and development expenditures to develop plans to make research freely available to the public within one year of publication in most cases. [43]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Institutes of Health</span> US government medical research agency

The National Institutes of Health, commonly referred to as NIH, is the primary agency of the United States government responsible for biomedical and public health research. It was founded in the late 1880s and is now part of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Many NIH facilities are located in Bethesda, Maryland, and other nearby suburbs of the Washington metropolitan area, with other primary facilities in the Research Triangle Park in North Carolina and smaller satellite facilities located around the United States. The NIH conducts its own scientific research through the NIH Intramural Research Program (IRP) and provides major biomedical research funding to non-NIH research facilities through its Extramural Research Program.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Darrell Issa</span> American politician (born 1953)

Darrell Edward Issa is an American businessman and politician serving as the U.S. representative for California's 48th congressional district. He represented the 50th congressional district from 2021 to 2023. A member of the Republican Party, he previously served in the United States House of Representatives from 2001 to 2019, representing two districts primarily covering North County in the San Diego area, first the 48th district for one term and then the 49th district for eight terms. From January 2011 to January 2015, he chaired the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elsevier</span> Dutch publishing and analytics company

Elsevier is a Dutch academic publishing company specializing in scientific, technical, and medical content. Its products include journals such as The Lancet, Cell, the ScienceDirect collection of electronic journals, Trends, the Current Opinion series, the online citation database Scopus, the SciVal tool for measuring research performance, the ClinicalKey search engine for clinicians, and the ClinicalPath evidence-based cancer care service. Elsevier's products and services include digital tools for data management, instruction, research analytics, and assessment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Conyers</span> American politician (1929–2019)

John James Conyers Jr. was an American politician of the Democratic Party who served as a U.S. representative from Michigan from 1965 to 2017. The districts he represented always included part of western Detroit. During his final three terms, his district included many of Detroit's western suburbs, as well as a large portion of the Downriver area.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carolyn Maloney</span> American politician (born 1946)

Carolyn Jane Maloney is an American politician who served as the U.S. representative for New York's 12th congressional district from 2013 to 2023, and for New York's 14th congressional district from 1993 to 2013. The district includes most of Manhattan's East Side, Astoria and Long Island City in Queens, Greenpoint, Brooklyn, as well as Roosevelt Island. A member of the Democratic Party, Maloney ran for reelection in 2022 but lost the primary to 10th district incumbent Jerry Nadler after redistricting drew them both into the 12th district.

PubMed Central (PMC) is a free digital repository that archives open access full-text scholarly articles that have been published in biomedical and life sciences journals. As one of the major research databases developed by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), PubMed Central is more than a document repository. Submissions to PMC are indexed and formatted for enhanced metadata, medical ontology, and unique identifiers which enrich the XML structured data for each article. Content within PMC can be linked to other NCBI databases and accessed via Entrez search and retrieval systems, further enhancing the public's ability to discover, read and build upon its biomedical knowledge.

The Fair Copyright in Research Works Act was submitted as a direct response to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Public Access Policy; intending to reverse it.

The Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA) is a proposal to require open public access to research funded by eleven U.S. federal government agencies. It was originally proposed by Senators John Cornyn and Joe Lieberman in 2006 and then again in 2010, and then once more in 2012.

H.R. 3699 or HR 3699 may refer to:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Cost of Knowledge</span> Protest movement against research publishing house Elsevier and for open science

The Cost of Knowledge is a protest by academics against the business practices of academic journal publisher Elsevier. Among the reasons for the protests were a call for lower prices for journals and to promote increased open access to information. The main work of the project was to ask researchers to sign a statement committing not to support Elsevier journals by publishing, performing peer review, or providing editorial services for these journals.

Academic journal publishing reform is the advocacy for changes in the way academic journals are created and distributed in the age of the Internet and the advent of electronic publishing. Since the rise of the Internet, people have organized campaigns to change the relationships among and between academic authors, their traditional distributors and their readership. Most of the discussion has centered on taking advantage of benefits offered by the Internet's capacity for widespread distribution of reading material.

The Academic Spring was the designation, inspired by the Arab Spring, used for a short time in 2012 to indicate movements by academics, researchers, and scholars opposing the restrictive copyright and circulation of traditional academic journals and promoting free access online instead.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Access2Research</span> Campaign for academic journal publishing reform

Access2Research is a campaign in the United States for academic journal publishing reform led by open access advocates Michael W. Carroll, Heather Joseph, Mike Rossner, and John Wilbanks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act</span>

The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR) is a bill in the United States that would mandate earlier public release of taxpayer-funded research. The bill has been introduced in 2013, 2015, and 2017. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) introduced the Senate version, while the bill was introduced to the House by Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Mike Doyle (D-Penn.) and Kevin Yoder (R-Kans.). The bill is a successor to the Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA), which had been introduced in 2006, 2010, and 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Disaster Assistance Nonprofit Fairness Act of 2013</span>

The Federal Disaster Assistance Nonprofit Fairness Act of 2013 is a bill that passed in the United States House of Representatives during the 113th United States Congress. The bill would make religious organizations and religious non-profits eligible to receive federal funding for repairs and rebuilding of their facilities after a major disaster. The bill amends the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act.

The NIH Public Access Policy is an open access mandate, drafted in 2004 and mandated in 2008, requiring that research papers describing research funded by the National Institutes of Health must be available to the public free through PubMed Central within 12 months of publication. PubMed Central is the self-archiving repository in which authors or their publishers deposit their publications. Copyright is retained by the usual holders, but authors may submit papers with one of the Creative Commons licenses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014</span> United States bill

The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 is an omnibus spending bill that packages several appropriation bills together in one larger bill. The 113th United States Congress failed to pass any of the twelve regular appropriations bills before the beginning of Fiscal Year 2014. The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014 temporarily funded the government from October 1, 2013 to January 15, 2014. A second continuing resolution extended funding until January 18, 2014, giving both the House and the Senate enough time to vote on this bill.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">FOIA Oversight and Implementation Act of 2014</span>

The FOIA Oversight and Implementation Act of 2014 is a bill that would amend the Freedom of Information Act in order to make it easier and faster to request and receive information. The bill would require the Office of Management and Budget to create a single FOIA website for people to use to make FOIA requests and check on the status of their request. The bill would also create a Chief FOIA Officers Council charged with reviewing compliance and recommending improvements. This bill would also require the federal agency to release the information it disclosed to the person who requested it publicly afterwards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gabriella Miller Kids First Research Act</span> United States federal law

The Gabriella Miller Kids First Research Act is a law that ended taxpayer contributions to the Presidential Election Campaign Fund and authorized a pediatric research initiative through the National Institutes of Health. The total funding for research would come to $126 million over 10 years. At the time of its passage, national conventions drew about 23% of their funding from the Presidential Election Campaign Fund.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">21st Century Cures Act</span> Bill enacted by the 114th United States Congress

The 21st Century Cures Act is a United States law enacted by the 114th United States Congress in December 2016 and then signed into law on December 13, 2016. It authorized $6.3 billion in funding, mostly for the National Institutes of Health. The act was supported especially by large pharmaceutical manufacturers and was opposed especially by some consumer organizations.

References

  1. 1 2 Rosen, Rebecca J. (January 5, 2012). "Why Is Open-Internet Champion Darrell Issa Supporting an Attack on Open Science?". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on January 13, 2012.
  2. ↑ H.R. 3699
  3. 1 2 Joseph, Heather (January 6, 2012). "Take Action: Oppose H.R. 3699, a new bill to block public access to publicly funded research". SPARC blog. Archived from the original on January 23, 2012. Retrieved January 8, 2012.
  4. 1 2 Trying to roll back the clock on Open Access statement by the American Library Association that "vehemently oppose[e]d the bill".
  5. ↑ "NIH Public Access Policy Details". nih.gov. Archived from the original on 2011-11-05. Retrieved 2012-05-27.
  6. ↑ Dobbs, David (January 6, 2012). "Congress Considers Paywalling Science You Already Paid For". Wired. Archived from the original on January 13, 2012.
  7. ↑ Piwowar, Heather. Research Works Act Attacks Data Dissemination Too
  8. ↑ "Research Works Act (2011 - H.R. 3699)". GovTrack.us.
  9. ↑ "List of members elected to the standing committees of the House of Representatives on January 5, 2011". Archived from the original on October 5, 2014. Retrieved January 11, 2012.
  10. ↑ Peter Suber (October 2, 2008). "A bill to overturn the NIH policy". SPARC Open Access Newsletter. Archived from the original on January 10, 2012. Retrieved January 15, 2012.
  11. ↑ Peter Suber (March 2, 2009). "Re-introduction of the bill to kill the NIH policy". SPARC Open Access Newsletter. Archived from the original on January 10, 2012. Retrieved January 15, 2012.
  12. ↑ "Message on the Research Works Act". www.elsevier.com.
  13. ↑ Howard, Jennifer (February 27, 2012). "Legislation to Bar Public-Access Requirement on Federal Research Is Dead" . Retrieved February 27, 2012.
  14. ↑ Sporkin, Andi (December 23, 2011). "Publishers Applaud "Research Works Act," Bipartisan Legislation To End Government Mandates on Private-Sector Scholarly Publishing". Association of American Publishers. Archived from the original on January 8, 2012. Retrieved January 7, 2012.
  15. ↑ "Statement from Copyright Alliance Executive Director Sandra Aistars, Re: Introduction of H.R. 3699, the Research Works Act". Archived from the original on 2012-01-17. Retrieved 2012-01-17.
  16. ↑ Joseph, Heather; McLennan, Jennifer (January 6, 2012). "Call to action: Oppose H.R. 3699, a bill to block public access to publicly funded research". Alliance for Taxpayer Access. Retrieved January 8, 2012.
  17. ↑ Jacobs, Grant (January 11, 2012). "ISCB to respond to Research Works Act (HR 3699)". Code for Life. Archived from the original on February 3, 2012. Retrieved January 15, 2012.
  18. ↑ Putlitz, Maxie (February 6, 2012). "Maximizing the visibility of research outputs: COAR call for action". Confederation of Open Access Repositories website. Archived from the original on February 10, 2012. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  19. ↑ Harnad, Stevan (January 7, 2012). "Research Works Act H.R.3699: The Private Publishing Tail Trying To Wag The Public Research Dog, Yet Again". Open Access Archivangelism. Retrieved January 8, 2012.
  20. ↑ Eisen, Michael (January 5, 2012). "Elsevier-funded NY Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney Wants to Deny Americans Access to Taxpayer Funded Research". Archived from the original on January 9, 2012. Retrieved January 8, 2012.
  21. ↑ Murray-Rust, Peter (January 6, 2012). "The Scholarly Poor could lose access to scientific research; this is serious" . Retrieved January 8, 2012.
  22. ↑ Peter Suber (January 6, 2012). "New bill to block open access to publicly-funded research". Archived from the original on January 18, 2012. Retrieved January 15, 2012.
  23. ↑ Eisen, Michael (January 7, 2012). "Our scientific societies need to quit the Association of American Publishers" . Retrieved January 8, 2012.
  24. ↑ Dupuis, John (January 5, 2012). "Scholarly Societies: It's time to abandon the AAP over The Research Works Act". Confessions of a Science Librarian.
  25. ↑ Richard Poynder (January 11, 2012). "MIT Press distances itself from Research Works Act". Open and Shut. Retrieved January 15, 2012.
  26. ↑ "Notes on the Research Works Act" . Retrieved February 7, 2012.
  27. ↑ Hunter R. Rawlings III (February 6, 2012). "AAU, APLU Express Opposition to Research Works Act". Association of American Universities website. Archived from the original on July 18, 2012. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  28. ↑ Hunter R. Rawlings III (February 9, 2012). "Seven public health groups write to oppose the "Research Works Act"". Knowledge Ecology International. Archived from the original on February 10, 2012. Retrieved February 9, 2012.
  29. ↑ Eisen, Michael (January 10, 2012). "Research Bought, Then Paid For". New York Times. Retrieved January 11, 2012.
  30. ↑ Taylor, Mike (16 January 2011). "Academic publishers have become the enemies of science". The Guardian.
  31. ↑ "The Cost of Knowledge" . Retrieved 2 March 2012.
  32. ↑ "Elsevier withdraws support for the Research Works Act". Elsevier. February 27, 2012. Archived from the original on February 29, 2012.
  33. ↑ Doctorow, Cory (28 February 2012). "Elsevier withdraws support from Research Works Act, bill collapses". BoingBoing. Retrieved 2 March 2012.
  34. ↑ Howard, Jennifer (27 February 2012). "Legislation to Bar Public-Access Requirement on Federal Research Is Dead". The Chronicle of Higher Education . Retrieved 28 February 2012.
  35. ↑ "Bill Text 110th Congress (2007–2008) H.R.6845.IH". The Library of Congress. Archived from the original on July 14, 2012. Retrieved 2015-10-24.
  36. ↑ "Speech of John Conyers in the House of Representatives, September 10, 2008". The Library of Congress. Archived from the original on June 30, 2012. Retrieved 2015-10-24.
  37. ↑ "Bill Text 111th Congress (2009–2010) H.R.801.IH". The Library of Congress. Archived from the original on 2015-11-05. Retrieved 2015-10-24.
  38. ↑ "Bill summary and status, H.R.801". The Library of Congress. Archived from the original on 2013-07-31. Retrieved 2015-10-24.
  39. ↑ S. 2695
  40. ↑ S. 1373
  41. ↑ Kaiser, Jocelyn (10 February 2012). "Lawmakers Reintroduce Public Access Bill". ScienceInsider. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved 10 February 2012.
  42. ↑ "Federal Research Public Access Act 2006". Archived from the original on 2012-01-11. Retrieved 2012-01-19.
  43. ↑ "White House Issues Public Access Directive". PublishersWeekly.com.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.